Sources of Authority
Sources of Authority
AUTHORITY
GE8 - ETHICS
SOURCES OF AUTHORITY
Several common ways of thinking about ethics ,are based on the idea that the
standards of valuation are imposed by a higher authority that commands our
obedience. In the following section, we will explore three of such ideas:
Authority of LAW
Authority of RELIGION
Authority of CULTURE
AUTHORITY OF LAW
Law is one’s guide to ethical behavior.
-the law does not tell us what we should do; it works by constraining us from
performing acts that we should not do-
AUTHORITY OF RELIGION
Many of us had been brought up with one form of religious
upbringing or another, so it is very possible that there is a
strong inclination in us to refer to our religious background to
back up our moral valuations.
Euthyphro
(Plato’s Dialouge)
Culture is a broad category of human life. Is encompasses every perceptions, attitudes and actions that
influence how an individual decides.
In essence, culture is not something people are born with but something they learn over time by
interacting with others within their community. As it is transmitted from generation to generation,
culture ensures continuity while also allowing for adaptation and change as societies evolve.
DEFINITIONS OF CULTURE
Culture is a notoriously difficult term to define. In one sense, culture is used to
denote those which are related to arts and humanities.
“culture… is that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and
any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society” – (cited by Avruch,
1998)
“culture is the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one group
or category of people from another” – (Hofstede, 1997)
“culture is the set of attitudes, values, beliefs, and behaviors shared by a group of people, but
different for each individual, communicated from one generation to the next” – (Matsumoto,
1996)
Culture, thus includes all the things individuals learn while growing up among
particular group: attitudes, standards of morality, rules of etiquette, perceptions of
reality, language, notions about the proper way to live, beliefs about how females
and males should interact, ideas about how the world works and so forth.
KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF CULTURE
Culture is manifested at different layers of
Culture is subject to gradual change
depth The various part of a culture are all, to some
Culture affects behavior and interpretations degree, interrelated
of behavior Culture is descriptive not an evaluative concept
Culture can be differentiated from both
universal human nature and unique
individual personality
Culture influences biological process
Culture is associated with social groups
Culture is both an individual construct and a
social construct
Culture has both universal and distinctive
elements
Culture is learned
HOW DOES CULTURE SHAPE
MORAL BEHAVIOR?
Culture is learned as children grow up in society and discover how their parents and others around
them interpret the world. Culture is shared.
Culture undeniably does play a significant pseudo role within shaping moral behaviour and extends even
further to social norms. Arguably, rather than defining our moral behavior per se, it influences and
changes our definitions of what ought to be deemed morally acceptable by consistent exposure to it.
The main determining question is whether moral behavior/actions are independent in comparison with
the case in question.
Culture, itself, is an individualistic, man-made concept of collective identity that is open to complete
subjectivity.
“Individuals are a product of their culture” and “learning a culture is an essential part of
human development” ” -(De Guzman & Pena, 2016)
CULTURAL RELATIVISM IN ETHICS
Cultural Relativism is the ability to understand a culture on its own terms and
not to make judgments using the standards of one’s own culture.
Cultural relativism is an affirmation that holds that societies are dissimilar in
their moral standards, their laws and culture protocols. To expand, cultural
relativism holds that what one culture believes is immoral, another culture
may believe is moral.
CATEGORIES OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM
1. Absolute: Everything that happens within a culture must and should not be questioned by outsiders.
2. Critical: Creates questions about cultural practices in terms of who is accepting them and why. Critical
cultural relativism also recognizes power relationships.
Cultural relativist argues that there is no absolute standard of good or evil,
therefore every decision and judgment of what is right and wrong is individually
decided in each society.
CULTURAL RELATIVISM AS COMPARED
TO MORAL RELATIVISM AND ETHICAL
RELATIVISM
Cultural relativism is the most famous form of moral relativism. In moral relativism, ethical judgments have their origins either in individual or
cultural standards. Our ethical judgments vary based on our origins and we have therefore varying moral principles which guides a person as
their basis of moral decisions and ethical judgment. We cannot say that this is right, this is wrong. There are variations.
In moral relativism, ethical judgments have their origins either in individual or cultural standards. Our ethical judgments vary based on our
origins and we have therefore varying moral principles which guides a person as their basis of moral decisions and ethical judgment.
Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong
depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in
another.
Ethical relativism denies the existence of a one universal moral law. Ethical relativism supports the idea
that because cultures of societies are dissimilar in astronomical ways they accept, it follows that there is
not one correct set of precepts everyone should adopt. So instead, people should follow the moral laws
and protocols that their own unique society sets forth or accepts Both concepts are related to one
another but there is a distinct difference between the two.
Cultural relativism is seen as different societies that believe in different moralities. Cultural relativists
see their view as a sociological fact where scholarly works proves the existence of different moralities.
Ethical relativists, on the contrary, claim that the same action that is moral is immoral in another. For
the ethical relativist, there are no universal moral standards -- standards that can be universally applied
to all peoples at all times. The only moral standards against which a society's practices can be judged
are its own.
ON GENERAL ETHICS
STANDPOINT
Ethics is an inquiry into right and wrong through a critical examination of the reasons underlying
practices and beliefs. As a theory for justifying moral practices and beliefs, ethical relativism fails to
recognize that some societies have better reasons for holding their views than others.
But even if the theory of ethical relativism is rejected, it must be acknowledged that the concept raises
important issues. Ethical relativism reminds us that different societies have different moral beliefs and
that our beliefs are deeply influenced by culture.
THE FILIPINO WAY – FILIPINO
MORAL CHARACTER
Filipino cultural morality centers on having a smooth interpersonal relationship.
To achieve this, we have six basic Filipino values:
Strengths 8. Extreme Personalism
1. Pakikipagkapwa-tao/Fellowship 9. Extreme Family Centeredness
2. Family Orientation 10.Lack of Discipline
3. Joy and Humor 11.Passivity and Lack of Initiative
4. Flexibility, Adaptability, and Creativity 12.Colonial Mentality
5. Hard Work and Industry 13.Kanya-Kanya Syndrome
6. Faith and Religiosity 14.Lack of Self-Analysis and Self Reflection
7. Ability to Survive
THE UNIVERSAL VALUES
By universal values we mean those values generally shared by cultures. There are some moral rules that
all societies will have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist.
1. Truth telling - without it, there would be no reason to pay attention to what anyone communicates with
anyone.