Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33
Decentralization and Governance
Introduction, Concepts, Types and Importance
LECTURE 1 Contents 1. Introduction to the topic 2. What is Decentralization? 3. Decentralization: Short Historical Context 4. 5 Key Principles of Decentralization 5. 4 Main Types of Decentralization 6. What is Governance? 7. Types of Governance 8. So, What is Decentralized Governance? (Definitions) 9. Centralized Governance system vs Decentralized Governance System 10. Examples of Countries with Successful Decentralized Governance Systems 11. Governance Decentralization in Pakistan- Successful or Not ??? 12. Short historical context of decentralized Governance in Pakistan 13. What you think about Pakistan Governance System??? Introduction to the Topic Decentralization distributes power locally (within org. or societies), while governance dictates decision-making processes & structures. The dynamic interplay between these concepts is crucial for crafting effective and responsive systems. In this exploration of decentralization and governance, we will delve into these concepts, examining their significance, various types, and the definitions that shape effective governance structures. Understanding the interplay between decentralization and governance is crucial for creating resilient and responsive systems in diverse organizational and societal contexts. WHAT IS DECENTRALIZATION? 1. Decentralization is the dispersion of power and decision-making from a concentrated or centralized source to multiple or dispersed sources. This can be done horizontally, among different actors or institutions at the same level, or vertically, among different levels of government or organization. Some examples of countries that have experienced different degrees of power dispersion are the United States, Canada, and Nigeria. (web.undp.org)
2. Decentralization is the process of transferring decision-making authority closer to the
point of service delivery. It is a way to improve the quality and responsiveness of public services and to increase the participation of citizens and local governments in defining and meeting local needs (www.worldbank.org) WHAT IS DECENTRALIZATION? 3. Decentralization is the process of redistributing or dispersing functions, powers, people, or things away from a central location or authority. (web.undp.org)
4. Decentralization is the assignment of tasks and responsibilities to the lowest possible
level of government or organization, according to the principle of subsidiarity. This means that higher levels of government or organization should only intervene when lower levels cannot perform the tasks adequately. Some examples of countries that have adopted the principle of subsidiarity in their constitutional or legal frameworks are Germany, Switzerland, and the European Union. (link.springer.com) DECENTRALIZATION: GENERAL FIGURES DECENTRALIZATION: Historical Context (1, 2) Ancient and classical civilizations (around 3000 BCE (or earlier) to 500 CE): Some of the earliest forms of decentralization can be traced back to ancient and classical civilizations, such as the city-states of Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome, the tribal confederations of Germania and Arabia, and the feudal systems of China and Japan. These societies were characterized by a high degree of political, economic, and cultural autonomy and diversity among their constituent units, often based on geographic, ethnic, or religious factors.
Medieval and Early Modern Europe (around 500 CE to 1700 CE):
Decentralization played a significant role in medieval and early modern Europe, particularly during the era of feudalism, the emergence of nation- states, and conflicts between the pope era and secular rulers. It resulted from power dynamics and negotiations among various authorities like the king, nobility, clergy, towns, and peasants (workers). During this period, decentralization aimed to attain political stability, economic development, and social justice. DECENTRALIZATION: Historical Context (3, 4) Colonialism and imperialism (late 1400s to the mid-1900s): Decentralization played a crucial role in the history of colonialism and imperialism, addressing the expansion and contraction of European empires, resistance from colonized peoples, and the formation of post-colonial states. It helped manage complex territories, address local needs, and encourage development. However, sometimes decentralization was used for control, exploitation, or cooperation.
Modern and contemporary world: Decentralization is a significant trend in the
modern world. It's connected to making things more democratic, global, and regional. Many countries, including the United States, Canada, India, Pakistan, Brazil, South Africa, and the European Union, aspire to or have achieved decentralization for goals like enhancing democracy, efficiency, responsiveness, participation, and diversity. DECENTRALIZATION: 5 Key Principles 1. Resilient Structure: Decentralized systems get stronger when faced with challenges and can handle unexpected problems well. 2. Comprehensive Design: Open and transparent, these systems welcome diverse participation and empower different perspectives. 3. Adaptive Flexibility: Decentralized systems use distributed networks, making it easier to create flexible and customized solutions for specific situations. 4. Collaborative Forces: Enhancing collaboration and cooperation, these systems support mutual aid and collective action. 5. Innovative Creativity: Known for innovation, decentralized systems generate new ideas and possibilities across various domains. DECENTRALIZATION: 4 Main Types Political Decentralization: Involves the distribution of political power and decision-making authority to multiple levels of government or local authorities. Examples: Provincial powers, Local Government Acts, Devolved Legislatures, Local Elections, Decentralized Budgets
Administrative Decentralization: In this type, responsibilities for
public services and administration are delegated to lower levels of government or local agencies, while overall policy direction remains centralized. Examples: Education Boards, Health Dep., Public Works Dep., Police /Law Enforcement Agencies, Welfare and Social Services Agencies
Fiscal Decentralization: Involves the delegation of financial
responsibilities, such as taxation and budget allocation, to lower levels of government or local entities. DECENTRALIZATION: 4 Main Types Market Decentralization: This type of decentralization involves the transfer of economic power from the central government to the private sector. It can be achieved through various means, such as privatization, deregulation, and liberalization. Market decentralization can help promote competition, innovation, and efficiency in the economy. Examples: 1. Cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, operate on a decentralized market model. Unlike traditional centralized banking systems, cryptocurrencies rely on a decentralized network of users to validate transactions through a process called mining. 2. Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms exemplify market decentralization. It is like borrowing money online without a bank. On some websites, people who need a loan connect directly with individuals willing to lend money. Website examples are LendingClub and Prosper etc. DECENTRALIZATION (OF GOVERNANCE) IN PAKISTAN (FIGURE) This simplified representation shows the federal government at the top, followed by provinces, districts, tehsils, and union councils. Each level of government has its own administrative and legislative powers, contributing to the political decentralization model in Pakistan. WHAT IS GOVERNANCE? (Definitions 1, 2) 1. Governance refers to patterns of rule or practices of governing (Britannica). Means, it refers to how decisions are made and how things are managed. It’s not just about the government; it includes other ways of organizing and controlling resources.
2. Governance encompasses several meanings: (1)
“the activity or process of governing,” (2) “a condition of an ordered rule,” (3) “those people charged with the duty of governing or governors,” and (4) “the manner, method, or system by which a particular society is governed.” (SpringerLink) WHAT IS GOVERNANCE? Definition 3, 4 3. Governance refers to the process of decision-making and the implementation (or lack thereof) of decisions. It applies to contexts such as corporate governance, international governance, national governance, and local governance. (ESCAP: United Nations)
4. Governance is the exercise of political
authority and the use of institutional resources to manage problems and societal affairs. It encompasses how power is exercised in managing a country’s economic and social resources for development. (School of Political 5 Main types of Governance Authoritarian Governance: A form of government characterized by strong central power and limited political freedoms. The ruling authority exercises strict control over political institutions, civil society, and the media. Only one political party or a small group holds power. Opposition parties or dissenting voices are suppressed or marginalized. Lack of Independent Judiciary. Basic civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, assembly, and association, are often restricted. Have some resemblance with Dictatorship. Examples Include North Korea, China, and Saudi Arabia. 5 Main types of Governance... Decentralized Governance: Can co-exist with Federal and Democratic, Distribution of Power, Local Autonomy, Flexibility and Customization. Examples: Pakistan, India, Brazil, United States, Germany, UK (constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy), Canada
Totalitarian Governance: Much similar to Authoritarian
governance, Single-Party Rule, State Control of Media, State Control of Economy, State Surveillance (monitoring of civilians through technology to track and control, Cult of Personality (portraying themselves as infallible and all-powerful), Limited Civil Liberties, State ideology. Examples: Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, North Korea under the Kim dynasty and Israeli Zionism in Palestine 5 Main types of Governance... Monarchy: Where a single individual, known as a monarch, holds supreme authority and power. The monarch is usually a hereditary ruler, meaning that their position is passed down through a royal family lineage. Examples: United Kingdom, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Spain, etc. Oligarchy: A form of government where power is concentrated in the hands of a small group of individuals or families who belong to a particular social, economic, or political elite. It can exist in both Democratic and Authoritarian systems. Rule by the wealthy. Rule by the nobility. Rule by experts or professionals. Examples: ancient Athens, modern Russia SO, WHAT IS DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE ??? Decentralized governance refers to a system of governance where decision- making authority, power, and responsibilities are dispersed across multiple levels of government, non-governmental organizations, or community entities. In a decentralized governance system, the central government delegates some of its powers and functions to lower levels of government or non-state actors, such as local governments, regional authorities, or grassroots organizations.
Decentralized governance means the transfer of authority from a central
government to a sub-national entity. (SpingerLink)
Decentralized governance means transfers authority and responsibility of major
government functions from the central level to sub-national entities, including local governments, civil society, and the private sector. (World Bank) WHAT IS DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE ??? Decentralizing governance refers to the restructuring or reorganization of authority so that there is a system of co-responsibility between institutions of governance at the central, regional and local levels according to the principle of subsidiarity, thus increasing the overall quality and effectiveness of the system of governance while increasing the authority and capacities of sub-national levels. (Wikipedia)
Decentralization governance is the transfer of authority, responsibility, and resources
from the center to lower levels of administration. This can occur through de- concentration, delegation, or devolution. (Brookings.edu) Centralized Gov. System vs Decentralized Gov. System Centralized Gov. System Decentralized Gov. System Decision-Making Authority: concentrated at the Decision-Making Authority: dispersed across top, typically with the central government or a multiple levels, such as local, regional, and single authority. national. Uniformity: uniform across the entire jurisdiction, Flexibility: greater flexibility and customization. with little room for local variation or customization. Local authorities can tailor policies and programs to meet local needs. Standardization: often prioritize standardization Innovation: can foster innovation and and uniformity, which can lead to consistency but experimentation. Have freedom to try new may not always be responsive to local needs. approaches Accountability: a clear line of accountability, as Accountability: more complex accountability decisions are made by a single authority. structures, as multiple authorities are involved in decision-making. Resource Allocation: can be more efficient in Resource Allocation: challenges in resource terms of coordination and resource allocation, as allocation and distribution, as resources may not decisions are made at a single point. always be distributed equitably across regions. Centralized Gov. System vs Decentralized Gov. System Examples of countries with Successful Decentralized Governance Systems 1. Switzerland: Switzerland is known for its highly decentralized governance system, where significant political, administrative, and fiscal powers are devolved to cantonal and municipal authorities. The Swiss cantons have considerable autonomy in areas such as education, healthcare, and taxation, allowing for tailored policies and services to meet local needs. This decentralized system has contributed to Switzerland's political stability, economic prosperity, and high quality of life. Examples of Successful Decentralized Governance Systems 2. Germany: Germany operates under a federal system of governance, where authority is divided between the federal government and 16 states. The states have significant autonomy in areas such as education, policing, and cultural affairs, allowing for policy experimentation and diversity. Germany's decentralized system has fostered regional identity, innovation, and economic competitiveness, contributing to the country's overall success. Examples of Successful Decentralized Gov. Systems 3. India: • India's system of governance is characterized by a multi- tiered structure, with authority shared between the central government, state governments, and local government bodies such as municipalities and panchayats. • Decentralization efforts such as the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments have empowered local governments with responsibilities for rural and urban development. • Successful examples include Kerala's decentralized healthcare system and Tamil Nadu's participatory budgeting initiatives, which have improved service delivery and citizen engagement. Examples of Successful Dec. Gov. Systems 4. Canada: Canada operates under a federal system where powers are divided between the federal government and 10 provinces, as well as three territories. Provinces have significant autonomy in areas such as healthcare, education, and natural resource management, allowing for tailored policies to meet regional needs. Canada's decentralized governance system has contributed to its cultural diversity, social cohesion, and economic prosperity. Examples of Successful Dec. Gov. Systems 5. Brazil: Brazil has implemented decentralized governance reforms, such as the Sistema Único de Saúde (Unified Health System), which devolves healthcare responsibilities to municipal governments. This decentralized healthcare system has led to improvements in access, coverage, and quality of healthcare services, particularly in underserved areas. Additionally, participatory budgeting initiatives in some cities have promoted citizen engagement and transparency in decision-making processes. Governance Decentralization in Pakistan- Successful or Not ??? Successful Aspects Local Empowerment: Decentralization initiatives such as the Devolution Plan of 2001 have aimed to empower local governments and enhance their capacity to address local needs and priorities.
Improved Service Delivery: In some cases,
decentralization has led to improved service delivery at the local level, particularly in sectors such as education and healthcare where local authorities have been given greater autonomy and resources. Successful Aspects… Political Participation: Decentralization has encouraged political participation at the grassroots level by providing opportunities for local leaders and communities to engage in decision-making processes and governance.
Efficiency and Accountability: Devolving administrative and financial
responsibilities to local governments has the potential to increase efficiency and accountability in the use of resources, as decision-makers are more directly accountable to the communities they serve.
Capacity Building: Decentralization efforts have focused on building the
capacity of local governments and institutions through training programs and technical assistance, which can contribute to more effective governance at the local level. Governance Decentralization in Pakistan- Successful or Not ??? Unsuccessful Aspects Resource Constraints: Many local governments in Pakistan face resource constraints, including limited fiscal autonomy and inadequate financial resources, which hinder their ability to effectively deliver services and implement development projects.
Political Interference: Decentralization efforts have
often been undermined by political interference from higher levels of government, leading to challenges in decision-making processes and the misuse of local government resources for political purposes. Unsuccessful Aspects… Capacity Challenges: Despite efforts to build the capacity of local governments, many continue to lack the necessary technical expertise and institutional capacity to effectively manage their responsibilities, leading to inefficiencies and service delivery gaps.
Inequitable Distribution: There have been concerns about the inequitable
distribution of resources and benefits under decentralized governance systems, with marginalized communities often being neglected in resource allocation and service delivery.
Coordination Issues: Decentralization has sometimes resulted in coordination
challenges between different tiers of government, leading to overlapping mandates, duplication of efforts, and inconsistencies in policy implementation. Short Historical Overview of Decentralized Governance in Pakistan 1959: The Local Government Ordinance in 1959 under the regime of President Ayub Khan. This ordinance aimed to devolve administrative and financial powers to local governments at the district, tehsil (sub-district), and union council levels. However, the system was largely centralized, with local governments serving as extensions of the central government rather than autonomous entities. 2001:In 2001, the Local Government Plan in Pakistan brought significant reforms aiming to decentralize governance. It established district, tehsil, and union councils with elected representatives to strengthen local government institutions, enhance their autonomy, and improve grassroots service delivery. Continue… 2003: 17th Amendment: The 17th Amendment to Pakistan's Constitution, enacted in December 2003, primarily aimed to rebalance powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. While the amendment didn't directly tackle decentralization or provincial autonomy, it sparked discussions on constitutional matters, laying the groundwork for future reforms in these areas. 2010: 18th Amendment: It significantly decentralized governance by transferring key powers to the provinces. It gave provinces greater legislative authority over areas like health and education and reinforced provincial autonomy. Additionally, the amendment granted provinces more control over natural resources. It limited the president's powers, strengthening parliamentary democracy and enhancing provincial autonomy. What you think about Pakistan Governance System???