Industrial Engineering UNIT I Notes - NIT D
Industrial Engineering UNIT I Notes - NIT D
ON
Industrial Engineering
Course Code: MEBB314
BY
Dr. Chitragupt Swaroop Chitransh
Assistant Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department
NIT Delhi - 110040 INDIA
E-mail: [email protected]
Course Objectives
The objective of this course is to understand the evolution of industrial engineering.
Course Outcomes
To understand the basic concepts of industrial engineering.
To estimate the basic work content in a specific job and to calculate the standard time.
To apply the fundamentals of materials management in industrial engineering
To analyze the appropriate wage and incentive plan for the employees of an
organization.
To develop the workplace for equipment and man machine system.
Industrial Engineering
Course Code: MEBB314
Topics to be covered…
History
Introduction
Taylor and Gilberth work
Productivity
System Efficiency Improvement Techniques
• Industrial and systems engineering is concerned with the design, improvement and
installation of integrated systems of people, materials, information, equipment and
energy.
• It draws upon specialized knowledge and skill in the mathematical, physical, and
social sciences together with the principles and methods of engineering analysis and
design, to specify, predict, and evaluate the results to be obtained from such systems.
PIONEERS OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Interchangibility of parts
Specialization of labor
Milestones
1.The idea that engineers have to design and fabricate products at costs, large number of
consumers can afford to pay was advocated. This idea gave birth to the subject of
Engineering Economics subsequently. H.R. Towne’s address in 1886 to American
Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) “The Engineer as an Economist” was a classic
paper in this area. The papers of Oberlin Smith also fall in this group.
2. Engineers got interested in wage incentive methods. Papers by Towne, F.R. Halsey and
H.L. Gantt between 1880 ad 1895 addressed this issue.
3. Engineers got involved in factory accounting issues. An English engineer and
accountant, Emile Garcke and J.M. Fells published a book on factory accounts in 1889.
4. Engineers recognized the importance of production control and paid attention to
improve the procedures of production control. H.C. Metcalfe’s “ A Shop Order System
of Accounts” was an early paper in this regard.
5. F.W. Taylor addressed issues related to shop management in a more comprehensive
manner in his paper “Shop Management” (1903).
6. Frank Gilbreth developed the motion study technique.
7. H.L. Gantt advocated training of operators.
8. Harrington Emerson came out with a book that emphasized efficiency of business
organizations and systems.
9. Lillian Moller Gilbreth work along with Frank Gilbreth on applied psychology to
industrial work.
10. Hugo Diemer authored book on Factory Management emphasizing industrial
engineering (1910).
11. Charles Going authored the book, Principles of Industrial Engineering (1911).
Match the
following
1- Value Analysis.
2-Method Study.
3- Time Study (Work Measurement).
4-Motion Economy.
5- Inventory Control.
6- Material Handling Analysis.
7-Ergonomics (Human Engineering).
8- System Analysis.
9- Operations Research Techniques.
Contribution of F.W. Taylor
In the 1890s, Frederick Winslow Taylor, became the most vigorous and successful
proponent of systematic management.
As an executive in production engineering and management, he introduced factory
accounting (cost accounting) systems and based on those records made engineering
changes in systems that gave lower cost of operation and production.
Taylor explained his systems through papers and discussions in meetings of American
Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). The systems and practices developed by Taylor
permitted engineers and managers to use operating records to guide their engineering
and production management actions.
Taylor investigated belt transmission systems using cost records and made many
recommendations to increase the economy of belts.
Taylor focused on reducing metal cutting times through various engineering
improvements to increase productivity of machines. The improvements include use of
cutting fluids, higher power in the machines for increasing feed, development of high
speed steel, development of tool life equation and many more improvements.
Taylor estimated the time required for taking each cut and reduced the time taken by
improvement in cutting speed, feed and depth of cut.
Taylor also advocated production control systems that allowed managers to
know more precisely what was happening on the shop floor, piece-rate
systems that encouraged workers to follow orders and instructions, and
various related measures.
Taylor developed time study of elements to measure time taken by machines
and men to perform various tasks done by operators.
Data collected from multiple machines and multiple operators were used to
identify ways of working that gave minimum times.
By incorporating the elements requiring minimum time, Taylor reduced the
task time.
He started the first department to do time studies and find minimum time
taking method of doing work elements and develop science.
Frederick Taylor established the first department in factory doing industrial engineering
work of process improvement for increase in productivity and cost reduction in 1885.
The name he gave it to the department is "Elementary Rate Fixing." Its function is to
breakdown the process into elements and find the best way of doing each element by
observing number of persons doing the same element and finding the best way
through time study.
The next step is to find science behind the way of doing the elements. Work elements
may be common among processes and therefore more persons can be observed doing
the same element in different processes.
Taylor had fashioned scientific management from systematic management. The two
approaches were intimately related.
Systematic and scientific management had common roots, attracted the same kinds of
people, and had the same business objectives. Yet in retrospect the differences stand
out.
Systematic management was diffuse and utilitarian, a series of isolated measures that
did not add up to a larger whole or have recognizable implications beyond day-to-day
industrial operations. Scientific management added significant detail and a larger view.
Industrial Engineering Described in Shop Management by F.W. Taylor
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2019/06/industrial-engineering-described-in.html
Time-study
http://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2013/08/time-study-by-fw-taylor.html
Contributions of Gilbreth
Competition for clients and recognition, especially after the recession of 1920-21
made executives more cost-conscious-produced other changes.
Some industrial engineering consultants began to seek clients outside
manufacturing.
Spurred by the growing corps of academicians who argued that the principles of
factory management applied to all businesses, they reorganized offices, stores,
banks, and other service organizations.
A Society of Industrial Engineers survey of leading consulting firms in 1925 reported
that many confined their work to plant design, accounting systems, machinery, or
marketing .
An important trend was an increasing preoccupation with labor issues and time
study.
A larger group emphasized the potential of incentive plans based on time and motion
study and disregarded or deemphasized the technical improvement.
Their more limited approach reflected the competition for clients, the trend toward
specialization, and the continuing attraction of rate cutting.
Indicative of this tendency was the work of two of the most successful consultants of
the post- 1915 years, Harrington Emerson and Charles E. Bedaux.
This led to the development of a major weakness in Industrial Engineering. Industrial
engineers got the description of "Time Study Men."
An example of benefits from product industrial engineering
and process industrial engineering
3 Years - 50% Cost Reduction - Diplexer Line
https://nraoiekc.blogspot.com/2020/05/ie-continuous-
improvement-3-years-50.htm
Producti
vity
Very simply,
Productivity = Output
Input
Total Productivity is the ratio of total output to the sum of all input factors.
Total productivity = total output / total input
Both the output and input(s) are expressed in real or physical terms by being reduced to constant rupees of a reference
period (base period).
26
Example for productivity measure
For a company XYZ, the total inputs and outputs have been converted in to money value and are
given below. calculate total productivity and partial productivity for different categories of inputs.
• Material input= Rs 20,000
• Human input= Rs 30,000
• Energy input= Rs 10,000
• Capital input= Rs 3,00,000
• Miscellaneous input= Rs 50,000
• Total output = Rs 5,00,000
Total productivity = total output/ total input
= 5,00,000/4,10,000 =1.219
Partial productivities
Inventory
Scheduling
Technology Management
Factors Affecting Productivity
• WWW. GOOGLE.COM
• http://www.iienet2.org
• Buffa E.S., (2009), Modern Production / Operational Management, John
Wiley & Sons.
• Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, Robert Johnston., (2010)Operation
Management, Pearson
• R. Danreid & Sanders, (2009), Operations Management, John Wiley &
Sons.
• Panneerselvam. R. (2006), Production/Operations Management,
Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd.
Thank You