Design and Cascade PI Controller-Based Robust

Model Reference Adaptive Control of DC-DC

Boost Converter

ROHITBALAJI S - 2116210901083
SABARISH KARTHIK C - 2116210901084

Under The Guidance Of

Mrs.Vinitha
Assistant Professor, Dept of EEE,
Rajalakshmi Engineering College

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

ABSTRACT
Cascade PI Controller-Based Robust Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) of a DC-DC boost
converter is presented. Non-minimum phase behaviour of the boost converter due to right half plane zero
constitutes a challenge and its non-linear dynamics complicate the control process while operating in
continuous conduction mode (CCM). The proposed control scheme effciently resolved complications and
challenges by using features of cascade PI control loop in combination with properties of MRAC. The
accuracy of the proposed control system's ability to track the desired signals and regulate the plant process
variables in the most bene_cial and optimised way without delay and overshoot is verified using
MATLAB/Simulink by applying comparative analysis with single PI and cascade PI controllers.

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

1.1 INTRODUCTION
WORKING
• The proposed control approach combines a Cascade Proportional-Integral (PI) controller with Model
Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) to improve the stability and performance of a DC-DC boost
converter, especially given the challenges posed by its non-minimum phase behavior and nonlinear
dynamics in continuous conduction mode (CCM). The Cascade PI controller structure addresses these
complexities by managing both current and voltage responses, while the MRAC component
dynamically adjusts control parameters to maintain optimal performance. This combination
effectively minimizes issues like delay and overshoot, ensuring accurate tracking of desired signals
and stable regulation of system variables. The control strategy’s effectiveness is validated in
MATLAB/Simulink, showing superior performance over traditional single PI and Cascade PI setups.

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

Double-loop PI controller design of the DC-DC boost
converter with a proposed approach for calculation of the
controller parameters

• Double-Loop PI Control Designed a dual-loop PI controller for a DC-DC boost converter,

enhancing stability and dynamic response.

• Parameter Calculation Approach Proposed a unique method for determining controller parameters,
optimizing performance.

• Improved Regulation Achieved better output voltage regulation and reduced response time with
the designed control strategy.
Rabiaa O, Mouna BH, Lassaad S, Aymen F, Aicha A.
Cascade control loop of dc-dc boost converter using pi
controller

• Cascade Control Structure: Implemented a cascade control loop for a DC-DC boost converter,
enhancing control over output dynamics.

• PI Controller Application: Used a PI controller in both inner and outer loops to improve system
stability and transient response.

• Performance Enhancement Achieved better voltage regulation and faster response in converter
operation with the cascade control approach.
Dinca L, Corcau JI. PI versus fuzzy control for a DC to DC boost
converter

• PI vs. Fuzzy Control Comparison Compared traditional PI control with fuzzy control for DC-DC
boost converter applications.

• Performance Metrics Assessed each method based on response time, stability, and voltage
regulation.

• Fuzzy Control Advantage Found fuzzy control to be more adaptable and responsive under varying
load conditions than PI control.
Nagarajan R, Yuvaraj R, Hemalatha V, Logapriya S, Mekala A, Priyanga
S. Implementation of PV-based boost converter using PI controller with
PSO algorithm”.

• PV-Based Boost Converter Designed a boost converter powered by a photovoltaic (PV) system to
enhance energy conversion efficiency.

• PI Controller with PSO Optimization Utilized a PI controller tuned with the Particle Swarm
Optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimal control parameter selection.

• Improved Efficiency and Stability Achieved better efficiency, stability, and dynamic performance
in the PV system by integrating PSO with the PI controller.
Sachin CS, Nayak SG. Design and simulation for sliding
mode control in DC-DC boost converter.

• Sliding Mode Control Design Developed a sliding mode control (SMC) approach for a DC-DC
boost converter to improve robustness against disturbances.

• Enhanced Stability Achieved improved stability and faster transient response by minimizing the
impact of parameter variations.

• Simulation Validation Simulated the SMC-based boost converter, demonstrating effective voltage
regulation and resilience to load changes.
Panda B, Sarkar A, Panda B, Hota PK. A comparative study of PI and
fuzzy controllers for solar powered DC-DC boost converter.

• Controller Comparison Compared the performance of PI and fuzzy controllers in a solar-powered

DC-DC boost converter.

• Evaluation Criteria Analyzed controllers based on output voltage regulation, response time, and
robustness under varying solar conditions.

• Fuzzy Controller Benefits Concluded that fuzzy control provides superior adaptability and stability
in fluctuating solar environments compared to PI control.
Asma C, Abdelaziz Z, Nadia Z. Dual loop control of DC-DC boost
converter based cascade sliding mode control

• Cascade Sliding Mode Control Developed a dual-loop control using cascade sliding mode control
(SMC) for a DC-DC boost converter.

• Enhanced Robustness Aimed to improve system robustness and performance against parameter
variations and disturbances.

• Improved Voltage Regulation Achieved better voltage regulation and reduced steady-state error
with the proposed control strategy.
Dwiono W. Fuzzy PI controllers performance on boost converter

• Fuzzy PI Controller Design Developed a fuzzy PI controller for a DC-DC boost converter to
enhance control adaptability.

• Performance Evaluation Analyzed the controller's performance in terms of response time, stability,
and voltage regulation.

• Enhanced Dynamic Response Found that the fuzzy PI controller provided improved response and

adaptability compared to traditional PI control.

1.2 OBJECTIVE

• Achieve stable and efficient voltage regulation in DC-DC boost converters.

• Implement a control system that adapts to varying load and disturbance conditions.

• Ensure the output closely follows the desired performance model.

• Enhance robustness and adaptability in dynamic environments using MRAC.

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

FLC(Fuzzy Logic Control) MRAC(Model Reference Adaptive Control)
Basis: Rule-based system with linguistic Basis: Mathematical model and real-time
variables and fuzzy logic Basis: Rule-based adaptation.
system with linguistic variables and fuzzy logic.

Adaptability: Limited adaptability; predefined Adaptability: Highly adaptive; real-time

rules. parameter tuning.

Mathematical Model: Not required Mathematical Model: Required for

reference model.

Complexity: Lower complexity. Complexity: Higher complexity.

1.3 BLOCK DIAGRAM

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

SIMULATION WITH MATLAB(SIMULINK)

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

SIMULATION RESULTS

RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI

CONCLUSION

In this study, a robust Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) approach with a cascade PI
controller was designed for a DC-DC boost converter to improve system stability and performance. The
cascade PI controller manages inner and outer control loops, enhancing control precision and response
speed. Integrating MRAC provides adaptability to changes in system parameters and varying load
conditions, ensuring robust performance. The results demonstrated that this combined control strategy
achieves superior voltage regulation, faster transient response, and better resilience against disturbances
compared to traditional control methods, making it an effective solution for stable operation in dynamic
environments.
 REFERENCES
1. Özdemir A, Erdem Z. Double-loop PI controller design of the DC-DC boost converter with a proposed
approach for calculation of the controller parameters. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,
Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering. 2018 Feb;232(2):137-48.
2. Rabiaa O, Mouna BH, Lassaad S, Aymen F, Aicha A. Cascade control loop of dc-dc boost converter using pi
controller. In2018 International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies
(ISAECT) 2018 Nov 21 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
3. Dinca L, Corcau JI. PI versus fuzzy control for a DC to DC boost converter”. In2016 International Symposium
on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM) 2016 Jun 22 (pp. 803-808).
IEEE.
4. Nagarajan R, Yuvaraj R, Hemalatha V, Logapriya S, Mekala A, Priyanga S. Implementation of PV-based boost
converter using PI controller with PSO algorithm”. International Journal of Engineering And Computer Science
(IJECS). 2017 Mar;6(3):20479-84.
5. Sachin CS, Nayak SG. Design and simulation for sliding mode control in DC-DC boost converter. In2017 2nd
International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) 2017 Oct 19 (pp. 440 445).
IEEE.
6. Panda B, Sarkar A, Panda B, Hota PK. A comparative study of PI and fuzzy controllers for solar powered DC-
DC boost converter. In2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks 2015 Jan 12
(pp. 47-51). IEEE.
RAJALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHENNAI
8. 7. Asma C, Abdelaziz Z, Nadia Z. Dual loop control of DC-DC boost converter based cascade
sliding mode control. In2017 International Conference on Green Energy Conversion Systems
(GECS) 2017 Mar 23 (pp. 1-6). IEEE. a
9. 8. Dwiono W. Fuzzy PI controllers performance on boost converter. International Journal of
Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2013 Apr 1;3(2):215.