Present Status and Future directions-CURVED CANALS JC 8
Present Status and Future directions-CURVED CANALS JC 8
Torsion is the axial force of being twisted when one part of a file rotates at a
different rate than another part.
A file with a larger diameter can resist more torsion stress than one with a
smaller diameter. The relationship varies very closely with the square of the
file radius.
So as to say, that a size 0.25 mm diameter can resist as
much as 50% more torque than a size 0.20 mm diameter
having the same design.
Cause of torsion stress:
Biocompatible
DISADVANTAGES OF NITI OVER STAINLESS STEEL
2 •In a straight canal, withstand torsion is related to the square of its diameter.
3 •In a curved canal, resist fatigue has an inverse relationship with the square of its diameter.
4
FATIGUE
INCREASES WITH THE
ELECTROPOLISHING (ELECTROCHEMICAL
SURFACE TREATMENT; 1999):
Surface treatment - Manufacturing
defects to
the cutting efficiency and fatigue
resistance of the file (Gavini et al.,
2018; Anderson et al., 2007).
Engine-driven
instruments of
different heat
treatments.
M-WIRE (2007): Unique thermomechanical
procedure at various temperatures, applied
before the machining of a new Niti alloy
composed of 55.8% Ni.
MARTENSIT
R PHASES
IC
SURFACE COLOUR
>35°C – M A phase
1 mm increments, is exceeded
A. STEP TWO
Determine the distance each of the files having
different sizeslimitations
Diameter and tapersin can safely
canals be advanced
having
around curvatures.
different curvatures can be extrapolated
mathematically.
Two factors
By using are to be
the diameter considered,
limitations for athe WL
curvature of
45° and
and the
8 mm radius
radii,ofthe
curvature.
following formula is
If the radius is 16 mm (two times the
suggested:
amount
Length stated
that the in be
file can theprojected
parameters),
around the
the curvature
diameter
= diameter limitation of
limitation−file tip asize
06 taper file is
larger thanfile 50taper
based on the square of the
file diameter.
For cases with an apical zone greater than
6 mm, curvature more than 45° and radius
less than 8 mm, the diameter limitations
Graphic representation of the single file reciprocating
technique (3 pecks of 1 mm amplitude guide the
reciprocating file to length after 3 insertions)
(Yared 2008)
If more flexible and fatigue-resistant martensitic heat
treated rotary NiTi files are to be used with the zone
technique, the suggested diameter limitations will have
to be re-adjusted to larger sizes for the same parameters
of curvature.
Torsional failure
CROWN-DOWN APPROACH
THE FLEXIBLE MARTENSITIC
INSTRUMENTS – free from
Highly curved maxillary molar managed with Tactile Controlled
Activation (TCA) instrumentation technique a. Preoperative
radiograph, b. 15/04 CM file stationary insert, c. TCA radiograph, d.
Straight view postoperative radiograph revealing the curvature
parameters in mesio-distal plane (25/.04 mm per mm tapered
preparation in the buccal roots), e. Proximal view postoperative
A mandibular second molar with asymptomatic irreversible
pulpitis and normal apical tissues presenting 2 mesial roots (a).
An “S” shaped curvature is present in the MB canal (b), the root
can be described as long and thin. The TCA technique was used
to achieve a 25/.04 mm per mm tapered preparation (c-f).
ARITHMETIC CROWN-DOWN DYNAMIC TACTILE
INSTRUMENTATION TECHNIQUE.
Combination
The technique is divided into the
following steps:
Step 1: Determination of zones
Step 2: Coronal zone flaring
equation:
In more challenging
anatomies,smaller size martensitic
files might be needed to reach the
WL
optimum canal engagement
for cutting and avoids
unnecessary stresses
DISINFECTION-RELATED FACTORS
The ability of an irrigant solution to be
distributed in the apical third depends
upon the following factors:
The irrigation delivery technique
The level of the needle penetration
The type and gauge of the needle
The canal anatomy
The final size and taper of root canal
preparation
The irrigant activation techniques used
Finer and more flexible irrigation needles (31–32 G)
may reach closer the apical third in such cases;
however, small needles require three to six times
stronger force to be applied to the syringe compared
to a 30 G needle, to obtain the same flow rate
(Boutsioukis et al., 2007).