2.1.1 Traditional Land Classification
2.1.1 Traditional Land Classification
Classification System
Bhim Bahadur Phadera (Adv.)
Asst. Professor, FWU - FoL
LL.M., B.A.LL.B., (T.U.)
9844801420
Raikar System
• The term Raikar is probably derived from Sanskrit words Rajya (state)
and kara (tax) thereby denoting land on which the state levies taxes.
• Raikar is therefore land which is the state retains under its ownership
and taxes the private individuals who operates it. It means land o
which taxes are payable to the government and which is listed in the
official records.
• This distinguishes Raikar from the other form of land tenure Birta,
Guthi, and Kipat, which do not necessarily pay tax and for the most
part are not listed in officials records.
• The state has traditionally considered itself the owner of all lands
within its domain.
• It was believed that land as a free commodity to be distributed amng the local
inhabitants on the basis of their need and the availability of lands.
• Muluki Ain 1910 Chapter On Land No. 1
• Other cultivable paddy land (kheta) shall be distributed to all peasants by
allotting land of good and bad quality [proportionally] according to the
[number of] members [of a household] and their physical capacity. If, when
distributed land made newly cultivable out of barren land is not sufficient [for
its cultivators], a share of cultivable village land equal [to the shortfall] shall
be provided. If the portion of land made newly cultivable is sufficient, there is
no need to provide [additional] paddy land. No land that has been made newly
cultivable shall be seized.
• Price of cultivated land was determined by the value of human labor
incorporated into it or occasionally, the higher marginal values of land
due to location or productions qualities.
• After human labor and investment were incorporated on the land
occupancy right emerged with the result that land is inheritable and
transferable but may be resumed by the state on nonpayment of taxes.
• the right to land was recognized for purpose of utilization so long as
taxes are paid regularly but in case of default the state reversed the
right of foreclosure.
• Rights on Raikar land are limited to occupancy right in relation to
state. In the event of default tax arrears are not realizable out of the
value of the landed property.
• It means where dealing with state is concerned, land has no value as
such and that the rights of the cultivators are secure only so long as he
pays the taxes regular.
• The relation between the state and the cultivators are thus essentially
similar to those between a landlord and his tenant.
• Regularity payment of the land tax is the prime condition for holding
land.
• Land owner is listed as Mohi (tenant) in the assessment records.
• Transaction of Raikar land involve a transfer of occuapancy rights
only and not of the land itself.
• The cultivators working Raikar land are merely tenants, and have no
ownership rights over the land as such.
• Raikar tenure may accordingly be described as a form of state
landlordism which originally involved a direct relationship between
the state the cultivator.
नेपाली बृहत शब्दकोश २०७५
• रैकर: अरु कसैको अधीनमा नभएको रैती आफैले
सरकारमा तिरो तिरेर कमाउने जग्गा, तिरो वा
बाली तहसिल गर्ने गरी सरकारद्वार
रैतीलाई कमाउन दिएको जग्गा, राजगुठी र
सरकारी लिखतबाहेकको राज्यकरको प्रत्यक्ष
रुपमा रहेको गैह्र गज्गा ।
Muluki Ain 2020 Chapter on Land Evictions
• No.1: Rajguthi lands and Kipat lands without official documents shall
be equivalent to Raikar (land subject to tax). Lands of all other
categories shall be Raikar.
Land Act 2021
• Section 2(b): "Tenant" means a peasant who
holds the land that belongs to another landowner
to till the same on any terms and cultivates the
land by him/herself or his/her family's labour.
Jirayat
• In addition to commission, the jimidar was allowed personal
use of a plot of land attached to the jimidari holding, known
as a jirayat.
• Jirayat land is taxable like agricultural land or any other
category.
• The facility to jamindar exists only in that it constitutes his
personal demesne on which he can appropriates rents.
• Therefore the jmidar is allowed personal use of a plot of land
attached to the jimdari holding, known as a Jirayat.
नेपाली बृहत शब्दकोश २०७५
• जिरायत:जिमिदारी प्रथा कायम
हुँदा जिमीदारका खान्कीमा
ठेकिएको जमिन,
• There is no precise rule to determine the extent of jirayat land in
proportion to the size of the Jimidari holding.
• Jirayat farms are said to be larger in the western terai districts where
units of cultivations are relatively larger and the pressure of
populations on the land lower than in the estern terai districts.
• jirayat system was originally established as part of the government
policy of encouraging the extension of the area under cultivations in
the terai.
Birta Land
• Giving by the state of its ownership rights in land in favor of private
individuals resulted in the emergence of the Birta system. Its literal
meaning an assignment of income from the land by the state in the
favor of individuals in order to provide them with a livelihood.
• Birta came into existence only after the state divests itself of
ownership, private ownership of land in Nepal which Birta implies, is
an not original right but is the result of a specific grant by the state.
• Land grants system by the state to members of selected classes to
assure them a stable income and ample leisure to engage in war,
religionor politics in the interests of the ruler.
• The land granted by the state in favor of priests, religious teachers,
soilders, and members of the nobility and royal family accordingly
constituted the foundation of then time state, such grants led to
emergence of Birta system.
• The Birta ownership not only insured a stable and secure income to
the beneficiary but also symbolized high social and economic status.
• Birta was infact regarded as a from of private property with a clearly
defined rights in relation to state.
बिर्ता उन्मुलन ऐन २०१६
• “बिर्ता जग्गा” भन्नाले सरकारी मतलपोत जम्मै
माफी गरी वा त्यस ठाँउको त्यस्तै किसिमका रैकर
जग्गामा लागेको मालपोत भन्दा कम तिर्ने गरी
पाएको वा हक भैरहेको सवै सवैकिसिमको जग्गा
सम्झनु पर्दछ र खण्ड (ख) र (ग) समेत परिभाषित
गरिएको बमोजिमको जग्गालाई समेत जनाउँदछ ।
• Under the Birta system peasants worked on behalf of the Birta owners
in conditions over which the government exercised no control.
• Police and judicial fuctionsn were discharged by the Birta Owners and
every local inhabitants was under the obligations to provide unpaind
labor services to them.
• Exempt from the regular land tax due to government, Birta owners
were entitled to appropriate not only agricultural rents but also
revenue from non agricultural sources.
• Birta system undoubtedly served the social economic and political
needs of the ruling classes of Nepal during the period before 1951.
• It was form of privileged landownership system that enabled them to
exploit the land resources of the nation for their personal advantage.
• Birta System is abolished by the Birta Abolition Act 2016.
Kipat: Communal Landownership System
• Other form of tenure had no reference to the ethnic or communal origin of the
land owner nor to the location of the land in any particular geographical area.
They reverted to the state if the owner died without leaving an heir or
relinquished his lands for any reason.
• In the Kipat form of land ownership on the other hand the communal authority
superseded any claim the state might extend on grounds of internal
sovereignty or state landlordism.
• Rights under Kipat tenure emerged not because of royal grant but because the
owner as member of a particular ethnic community was in customary
occupation of lands situated in a particular piece of land but where his rights to
dispose of the land are restricted on the theory that the land belong to the chief
or to the tribe.
……
• The Kipat system may have been a relic of the customary form of land
control which communities of Mongoloid or autochthonous tribal origin
established in areas occupied by them before the immigration of racial
groups of Indo-Aryan origin.
• Prominent among the kipat owning communities of Nepal were the Limbus
of Pallokirat, a term traditionally used to denote the present districts of Ilam
Dhankuta, Panchthar, Terhathum, Taplejung and Sankhuwa-Sabha.
• Other kipat owning communites which included Rai, Majhiya, Bhote, Yakha,
Tamang, Hayu, Chepang, Baramu, Danuwar, Sunuwar, Kumhal, Pahari,
Thami, Sherpa, Majhi and Lepcha were scattered throughout the eastern and
western midlands.
…
• Kinship, geographical location and customary occupation were the main
characterstics of kiapt landownership. A kipat owner derived his rights by
virtue of his membership in a particular ethnic groups.
• Thus, under the Kipat system each segment of a dispersed patrilineal clan
was associated with a particular territory and individual rights to land were
established on the basis of membership in such local descent group.
• Exclusive character of kipat system in relation to specific ethnic groups was
manifested in practical form in the non-salability of land to the other groups.
Kipat land generally could not be sold outside the community.
• There was however no restriction on alienation within the group itself. Kipat
land alienated by a Limbu to another Limbu would still retain its communal
character but no when transferred to a Tamang.
…..
• The communal character of kipat landownership did not mean that land
was actually cultivated on communal basis.
• Kipat land in fact, was owned and cultivates by individuals but only
subject to the reversionary rights of the community.
• This meant that if any member of the Kipat owning community ceased to
exersice his rights to own and cultivate his ancestral plot oof land, the
right to determine the nature and extent of its use by others was enjoyed
not by him, not by the state as on Raikar lands, but by the community.
• Such vacant lands reallocated to the suitable applicant within the
community by the headman in his capacity of representative of the
community.
Land Act 2021
• Chapter-2 Abolition of Jimidari
• Section 4: Provision on Kipat:
1) The Kipat land may, like the Raikar land, be transferred by
conveyance (Pharchhe Rajinama).
2) The Kipat land shall, like the Raikar land, be subjected to land
revenue.
Ukhada
• The position of the Jimidar as landowner was more prominent under
the special form of the system known as Ukhada which is existed in
the districts of Nawalparasi, Rupandehi, and kapilvastu.
• The chief characteristics of the Ukhada system was that landownership
rights were vested in the jimidar who collected the rents from the
registered landholders in cash.
• The difference between these cash rents and the tax payable to the
state constitute the jimidar’s profit.
उखडा
सम्वन्
धि ऐन,
२०२१
• This is like contract farming by paying fixed cash or kind payment to the
landlord.
• The land they cultivated (or cultivate) was not registered in anyone’s land, but
landlords had control in it, according to Sir Jirayat.
• In the past landlord had land in many places and they were not able to cultivate
all the land. The land would remain fallow and in this case they were not able to
pay the land revenue.
• If land revenue is not paid, land could have been publicly auctioned. To save the
land under their jurisdiction, they employed Indian and Nepali landless people to
cultivate the land and charged the rent, some times more than the double of land
revenue to be paid.
• The land revenue had then to be paid to the government. They took cash rent.
• Waste and Forests lands in those districts were registered in the name
of jimidars on the taxable basis. In order to lessen their tax liability
jimidar gave such lands to cultivatirs on relatively favorable terms
which eventually assumed the form of the Ukhada system.
• The Ukhada system thus constituted a via media between full-fledge
jimidari landownership and tenancy.
• Rents not being payable in kind the tenant was able to profit byr=
rising the prices. The jimidar on the other hand was assured nominal
ownership of land and small margin of profit.
• The Ukhada Act 2021 abolished the Ukhada system in Nepal.
Jagir System/Khangi or Khanki
• According to the traditional land system in Nepal, the state was a landlord
entitled to receive rents from the cultivators. There existed a clear division of
the fruits of the cultivation of the land Talsing-Boti, the landlord’s share
accruing to the state and Mohi-Boti the portion of the crops that the
cultivators was allowed to retain.
• Assignments of the Talsing-Boti in favor of government employees and
functionaries as their emoluments created the Jagir form of land tenure.
• Lands on which the state retained the Talsing-Boti were in contradistinction,
designated as Jagera or reserve, presumably in anticipation of eventual
assignments as jagir.
• The totality of Jagera and Jagir lands constituted the area owned by the state
under Raikar tenure.
• The Jagir land tenure system in fact emerged only through the assignment of
revenues of Raikar lands.
• In its ultimate form the jagir system implied a mere assignment of land revenue.
Jagirdars, unlike Birta owners did not enjoy the rights to resume lands for personal
residence or cultivation.
• The term khangi was used to denote the rents accruing from the lands assigned to
any jagirdar.
• While Birta land ownership rights were generally inheritable and transferable,
jagir rights were limited to the individuals use of the assignee.
• The Jagirdar was no doubt permitted to sell or mortgage rents on his Jagir lands
during any particular year but such transactions did not have any effect on his
jagir rights as such
….
• Birta constituted the form of private property but jagir was a
temporary assignment intended to compensate the jagirdar for the
specific services rendered by him and terminable at discretion of the
government.
• Jagir land assignments were made to all categories of civil and
military functionaries all over the kingdom as well as to the
washermen, porters, cowherds, musicians, goldsmiths of gunpowder
factories arsenals and the officials entrusted with the responsibility of
writing petitions to the Chinese emperor and diplomatic
correspondence in sanskrit.
• the jagir were temporary, lifetime, or inheritable according to the
terms of assignment.
….
• Assignments of land as jagir didi not automatically entitled jagirdars
to collect rents from the cultivators. For this they received annually
documents known as Tirja which specifid the form and level of rent
payment.
• The figure mentioned in the Tirja conformed to that indicated in the
tax assessment records.
• In 2008 BS the government of Nepal resumed all the assingments of
Raikar land as Jagir and imposed taxes on them at currents rate. It also
directed payment of cash salaries to all government employees
according to prescribed pay scale.
• This marked the end of the jagir system of landownership in Nepal.
Rakam: System of Free Labor Service
• The right of the state to exact compulsory, unpaid labor from its
subjects for public purposes has traditionally been recognized in Nepal.
• They were taken into the army, employed in munitions factories, or
forced to work s porters for the transportation of military stores.
• The government also impressed their services to construct and repair
forts bridges, and irrigation channels reclaim waste lands capture wild
elephants and supply fuel woods charcoal fodder and other materials
required by the royal hoseholds.
• In this system known as Jhara people could be employed without
wages in any manner required by the government.
• In order to insure that the onerous and gratuitous character of Jhara services
should not alienate the peasantry the government started providing Jhara
workers with specials facilities of fiscal and tenurial nature.
• Jhara workers were granted full or partial exemption from the payment of
taxes due on homesteads although their obligations to pay rents or taxes rice
lands remained unaffected.
• They were also protected from the eviction from the lands being cultivated
by them so long as they made the prescribed payments and performed the
prescribed labor services.
• Such facilities and benefits could be provided only when the services
rendered by Jhara workers were regular and specific.
• The general labor obligations due under the Jhara system were therefore commuted
whenever possible to specific to be rendered on a regular basis by the inhabitants of
specific village or area. The system was then konwn as Rakam.
• Whereas the labor supply required for the construction of roads or the repair of
bridges was obtained under the Jhara system, Rakam services included the supply
of fuel wood and charcoal for governmental establishments and the transportations
of mail.
• In other words Jhara labor was impressed for nonrecurring purposes and Rakam
supplied the regular needs.
• Under the Rakam system the services of the inhabitants of specified village or areas
were assigned on regular basis for the performance of labor according to the
requirements of the government and lands being cultivated by the them were
converted into Rakam tenure.
• The imposition of Rakam obligations did not of itself create a new
form of land tenure.
• The conversion into Rakam tenure of Raikar or Raj guthi land held by
Rakam workers and occasionally the allotment of additional lands to
them represented essentially administrative measures aimed at
insuring the continuity of Rakam services and the stability of the
Rakam population.
• Rakam obligations were imposed upon able bodied populations, those
who were unable to perform Rakam obligations i.e minor, old alged,
lame crippled, widow, were called Chuni
• The acceptance of the Rakam obligations were left to the choice of the
peasants. But nonacceptance led to the forfeitures of his right to
cultivate his lands.
• The voluntary nature of Rakam obligations was purely illusionary.
• The obligations were generally expressed in terms of the number of
days to be worked during the year. Most Rakam workers were
required to serve for six days each month, a total period of 72 days in
the year.
• The six days period was staggered among the number of work teams
in such a way that the government was able to untilize Rakam services
regurlarly throughout the year.
• Rakam workers cultivate rice lands under Raikar, Kipat, or Rajguthi
tenure. Their obligations to pay rents on such lands remained
unaffected.
• Most of the Raikar area during the 19 th century had been assigned as
jagir and Rakam workers therefore paid rents to jagirdars in the
capacity of tenants.
• Rakam tenants were garnted a number of tenurial facilities that were
not available to cutivators on lands of other categories.
• To some extent those facilities were provded in consideration of the
dual obligations borne by them- of paying rents on their lands while
simultaneously providing the labor services to the government.
Abolition of Rakam System
• The Interim Government Act 2007 declared the abolition of
compulsory and unpaid labor to be directive principles of state policy.
• Ultimately in 2020 Muluki Ain abolished this practice entirely.
• The No. 6 of Chapter on Jagga Pajaniko had stated “all the Rakam
imposed on the land have been abolished. If taxes have not been
imposed o Rakam lands or have been imposed at rates lower than
those current in any area these shall now imposed and collected at
current rates.”
Jhora Land System
• In 1970-71, landless peasants had occupied the forestland in Morang
district and other surrounding districts, and they were killed by the
army for encroaching upon the forest.
• The killings raised a protest by landless people (sukumbasis).
Government then introduced a new Act called Jhora Land Act 2028
(1971). It was enacted to give land rights to landless families.
Jhora Land Act 2028
• Preamble: Whereas, it is expedient to make timely arrangements
regarding reclaimed Jhora Land in Morang, Sunsari and Jhapa districts
in order to maintain peace and order and insure the economic interests
of the general people,