CVLE465 Lecture 1
CVLE465 Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Lateral Earth Pressures
1
Introduction
The pressure on a wall that tilts away from the retained soil is the
active earth pressure.
The pressure on a wall that is pushed into the soil is the passive earth
pressure.
Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest
For a vertical wall illustrated in the figure on the following slide:
H = height of wall, = unit weight of retained soil, and there is a
uniform load of unit area. The shear strength of the soil is defined
as
= cohesion
If the wall is at rest and is not allowed to move at all, either away from
the soil mass or into the soil mass, the lateral pressure at a depth z is
The total force (Po) per unit length of the wall can be determined by the
equation
If the effective unit weight of soil below the water table equals , then
at
at
at
Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest
Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest
Determining the total pressure distribution on the wall requires adding
the hydrostatic pressure (u).
From z = 0 to z = H1, u = 0
If z = H2, then
Total pressure is
Rankine Active Earth Pressure
If a wall tends to move away from the soil a distance ( ), the soil
pressure on the wall at any depth will decrease.
The slip lines (failure planes) in the soil mass will then make angles of
with the horizontal, as shown in the figure on the next slide.
Rankine Active Earth Pressure
Rankine Active Earth Pressure
For circle c in the Mohr’s circle figure, we can use the equation
Rankine Active Earth Pressure
The variation of the active pressure with depth for the wall shown in the
previous figure is given by the figure on the following slide.
Total Rankine active force per unit length of the wall before the tensile
crack occurs is
Rankine Active Earth Pressure
Rankine Active Earth Pressure
After the tensile crack appears, the force per unit length on the wall will
be caused only by the pressure distribution between depths z = zc and
z=H
1 2c '
Pa H (HK a 2c ' K a )
2 Ka
Assumptions of Rankine's theory
Rankine approached the lateral earth pressure problem with the following
assumptions:
1.The soil is homogeneous and isotropic, which means c, φ and γ have the same values
everywhere, and they have the same values in all directions at every point (i.e., the
strength on a vertical plane is the same as that on a horizontal plane). This discussion
will be expanded later to consider layered soils, where each layer has different values
of c, φ and γ∙
2.The most critical shear surface is a plane. In reality, it is slightly concave up, but this is
a reasonable assumption (especially for the active case) and it simplifies the analysis.
3.The ground surface is a plane (although it does not necessarily need to be level).
4.The wall is infinitely long so that the problem may be analyzed in only two
dimensions. Geotechnical engineers refer to this as a plane strain condition.
5.The wall moves sufficiently to develop the active or passive condition.
6.The resultant of the normal and shear forces that act on the back of the wall is
inclined at an angle parallel to the ground surface (Coulomb's theory provides a more
accurate model of shear forces acting on the wall).
22
16.5 Cont.
A Generalized Case for Rankine Active Pressure—
Granular Backfill
The figure below shows a retaining wall whose back is inclined at an angle
with the vertical. The granular backfill is inclined at an angle with the
horizontal.
A Generalized Case for Rankine Active Pressure—
Granular Backfill
For a Rankine active case, the lateral earth pressure at a depth z can
be given as
The active force for unit length of the wall can be calculated as
A Generalized Case for Rankine Active Pressure—
Granular Backfill
The location and direction of the resultant force Pa is shown in the figure
below
A Generalized Case for Rankine Active Pressure—
Granular Backfill
There are special cases for a vertical backface of a wall as shown in the
figure below
A Generalized Case for Rankine Active Pressure—
Granular Backfill
If the backfill of a frictionless retaining wall is a granular soil and rises at
an angle with respect to the horizontal, we can use the equation
With
c'
2cos 2 cos ' sin '
2
' 1 z
Ka 2 '
1
cos 2 2 ' c'
z
2 ' c'
[4cos (cos cos )4 cos 8 cos2 sin ' cos ']
2
z
Coulomb’s Active Earth Pressure
Coulomb proposed a theory for calculating the lateral earth pressure on a
retaining wall with granular soil backfill.
To find the active force, consider a possible soil failure wedge ABC1. The
forces acting on this wedge are
sin2( ' )
Ka 2
2 '
sin( )sin( )
' ' '
sin sin( ) 1 '
sin( )sin( )
The line of action of the resultant force (Pa) will act at a distance H/3
above the base of the wall and will be inclined at an angle to the
normal drawn to the back of the wall.
In designing retaining walls, the value of the wall friction angle is between
' 2 '
and
2 3
The active earth pressure coefficients for various values are provided in
Tables 16.6 and 16.7 in the book.
Coulomb’s Active Earth Pressure
Referring to the figure below, we calculate active force as
where
Lateral Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge
Sometimes the theory of elasticity is used to determine the lateral earth
pressure on unyielding retaining structures caused by various types of
surcharge loading.
(The terms a and b are explained by the figure on the following slide)
Lateral Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge
Lateral Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge
Since soil is not a perfectly elastic medium, we deviate from the equation
if
and
if
Lateral Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge
The figure below shows a strip load with an intensity of q/unit area
located at a distance b’ from a wall of height H.
2q
( sin cos2 )
The total force per unit length (P) due to the strip loading only may be
expressed as
With
'
b
a' b'
1
1 tan (deg) 2 tan (deg)
H H
Lateral Earth Pressure Due to Surcharge
The location of the resultant force can be given as
where
Active Earth Pressure for Earthquake
Conditions—Granular Backfill
Coulomb’s active earth pressure theory can be extended to take into
account the forces caused by an earthquake.
With
and
3. Calculate
5. Assume that acts at a distance 0.6H from the bottom of the wall
This procedure applies to the figure below which we can refer to as the
ABC trail failure wedge.
Active Earth Pressure for Earthquake Condition
The figure on the following slide shows the polygon for all forces acting on
the wedge ABC.
If the wall does not yield at all, the lateral stress at that depth will be
. This stress is illustrated by the Mohr’s circle a in the figure
below.
Rankine Passive Earth Pressure
If the wall is pushed into the soil mass by an amount as shown in the
figure below, the vertical stress at depth z will stay the same
Note that this Mohr’s circle touches the Mohr–Coulomb failure envelope, which
implies that the soil behind the wall will fail by being pushed upward.
The horizontal stress at this point is known as the Rankine passive pressure.
Rankine Passive Earth Pressure
For Mohr’s circle c, the major principal stress is while the minor stress is
.
p' zK p
The passive force is
with
Rankine Passive Earth Pressure – Vertical Backface and
Inclined Backfill
If the backfill of the frictionless vertical retaining wall is , then
With
c'
2cos 2 cos ' sin '
2
' 1 z
Kp 2 '
1
cos 2 2 ' c'
z
2 ' c'
[4cos (cos cos )4 cos 8 cos2 sin ' cos ']
2
z
Coulomb’s Passive Earth Pressure
Coulomb presented an analysis for determining the passive earth pressure
for walls with friction and retaining a granular backfill material.
For a trial failure wedge of soil, such as ABC1 , the forces per unit length
of the wall acting on the wedge are
The figure below shows the force triangle at equilibrium for the trial
wedge ABC1.
From this force triangle, the value of Pp can be determined, because the
direction of all three forces and the magnitude of one force are known.
Coulomb’s Passive Earth Pressure
sin2( ' )
Kp 2
2 '
sin( ' ' )sin( ' )
sin sin( ) 1 '
sin( )sin( a)
Comments on the Failure Surface Assumption for
Coulomb’s Pressure Calculations
For walls with friction, this assumption does not hold in practice.
The nature of actual failure surface in the soil mass for active and passive
pressure is shown in the figures on the following slide.
Comments on the Failure Surface Assumption for
Coulomb’s Pressure Calculations