Tax Law Slide
Tax Law Slide
Mohammode D.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE
1.1. The Meaning & Scope of Public Finance
• Public finance can be understood in terms of its characteristics
and constituents rather than in terms of what it directly is.
• Thus, it is generally described as the study of how government
finances itself, the study of government budget, relationship
between revenue and expenditure and their administration, and
the regulation of markets.
• Public finance in effect centers upon government financing and
spending in the performance of various state functions ranging
from socio-political to economic ones.
• A wider concept that incorporates taxation & other government
revenues, and government expenses.
• Also known as “public sector economics” or “public economics.”
• It is recent origin as a science,
• Broadness in scope
Scope of public finance wide-ranging –
government has role in many activities,
but focus will be on revenues and spending
• Dynamic and
• Greater affiliation to multiple disciplines,
It is an interdisciplinary science –coordinated
interplay among law, economics, financial
accounting and, of course, politics.
Law: stipulates for the constitutional & legal basis
for public finance
Economics: provides for theoretical &
philosophical foundations for public finance
Financial accounting: harbors arithmetic &
mathematical difficulties by determining, for
instance, taxable bases, various tax rates and
liability, and auditing.
Since public finance is manifestation of state’s
authority on financing policy through political
decision making it has a lot to do with Politics.
• All these have created a difficulty in ascribing to it
a specific, eternal & universally accepted meaning.
In lump sum
• The study of how governments collect and
spend money and real resources
• How do governments collect/spend money?
Positive analysis
• How should governments collect/spend
money? Normative analysis
• We are studying public finance in a market
economy
1.2. Public Finance Vs Private Finance
Similarities
• Monetized
• Engaged in purchases, sales & other
transactions
• Production and exchange to saving and capital
accumulation
• The same problems and a similar set of
decisions to make: Scarce resource- the
ultimate end of satisfying wants
Differences
• Deficit financing
• Manner of borrowing (forms and rates)
• Creation of legal tender
• operative economic guidelines
• long-term vs short-term plan.
1.3. State Economic Role
How should a government function in an
economic sphere?
i. Mechanistic view –
• government is a contrivance created by
individuals to better achieve their individual
goals. Individual, not group, is at center stage.
• This is the traditional viewpoint taken by
public finance
• Individuals are paramount, government
created to meet the needs of individuals
• Big debate over importance of individual
freedom
• Two types of freedom:
– Freedom to do as you like
– Freedom not to suffer from activities of others
As society grows more crowded, second type of
freedom becomes more important
ii. Organic view of government
• Society is a natural organism
• Goals of society set by state
• Actions of individual are judged by the
contribution they make to the state
• “Ask not what your country can do for you;
ask what you can do for your country.”
• Ideology also matters
What does ideology mean?
• It is all about the political economic position of the
government concerning government-market
relationship
•See the diagram
• Controversies about the proper role of the
government raise the fundamental questions
addressed by the branch of economics known as
public finance.
• Taxes
• Fees/Charges
• Loans
• Profits/Returns
• Money Creation/printing
• Donation/Aid
• Fines
• Stump duty
• Lottery
• Escheat
2.2. Classification of Revenue Sources
Taxation:-
• refers to a charge levied by state on the property or
labor of a citizen in order to provide for the public
expenses.
• is a part of wealth of individuals which the authority of
the state, province or municipality appropriates in order
to provide funds for addressing collective interests.
• is only an advance payment to obtain protection for
social order.
• is an exchange in which the state gives services.
• is the price we pay for civilization.
How do you see these definitions?
• A more precise definition of tax is that “tax is a compulsory
contribution of the wealth of a person or body of persons to the
government.”
(i) Tax is a compulsory levy
• The consent of the taxpayer is not part of the bargain.
• Any voluntary contribution is not tax proper. All elements of the
tax are determined by the governmental process independently of
the taxpayer.
(ii) Tax is a contribution: non quid pro-quo
• It is a sacrifice in which there is no quid pro-quo.
• The absence of a quid pro quo means that there is no expectation
of direct and definite benefit in return for the payment of a tax.
• The possible benefits received by taxpayers from the government
are not related to or based on their being taxpayers.
(iii) Taxation affects wealth
forced labor, goods or things or commodities. Or currency terms,
Hugo Dalton,
• “a tax is a compulsory contribution imposed by a
public authority, irrespective of the exact amount of
service rendered to the tax payer in return, and not
imposed as a penalty for any legal offence.”
• Again to emphasize the compulsory element in tax
the author states, “a tax, by definition, is a payment,
in return for which no direct and specific quid pro
quo (give and take) is rendered to the payer.”
Note the following points in relation to the above
discussion:
• The mere existence of compulsion does not make a levy
a tax; there also must not be a quid pro quo
relationship. Compulsoriness and absence of quid pro
quo are cumulative requirements.
• Tax distinguished from the price/charge/fee
• There are also compulsory payments to the state which
involve a quid pro quo relationship; a betterment levy vs
tax.
• Fines are compulsory and do not involve a quid pro quo,
and to that extent they may be confused with taxes.
are neither prices nor charges nor taxes.
So how can we distinguish fine from taxes?
• The “intention test” distinguishes fines from taxes.
The intention of the government in imposing fines is
not the derivation of revenue, rather the curbing of
offences or conducts unwelcoming to the
community.
3.2. History of Taxation
• Reading Assignment
I. World History
A. Ancient Time
• In the ancient civilizations of Palestine, Egypt, Assyria and
Babylonia, individual property rights did not exist.
• The king was the sole owner of everything in his domain.
• The king could simply force individuals to work for him to earn
income in the form of food from their lands and precious
metals from their mines.
• If this income did not meet the king’s demands, he might lead
his armies into neighboring countries to confiscate their
property as tribute
• They would also resort to taxing their own people over some
• The first known system of taxation was in ancient Pharaohic
Egypt around 3000-2800 BC; a biennial tour of the kingdom,
collecting tax revenue from the people.
• Under Ptolemaic dynasty, a later long-lived kingdom in ancient
Egypt, poll taxes (taxes on every adult at the same rate) were
the major source of state revenue.
• The government of ancient city-state of Athens relied for
revenue on publicly owned silver mines, tribute from
conquered states, a few customs duties, and voluntary
contributions from citizens.
• In times of war, the Athenians imposed a tax referred to as
eisphora.
• They were used to refund tax.
• Athenians also imposed poll taxes, known as metoikion, only on
foreigners (people who did not have both an Athenian Mother
and Father) and slaves, and made failure to pay a capital crime.
• In the early years of the Roman republic all Roman
citizens paid a poll tax.
• However, Roman military victories brought in so
much foreign tribute that the government
exempted citizens from this tax in the 2nd century
BC.
• More than hundred years later, Caesar Augustus, a
Roman emperor considered by many to be the most
brilliant tax strategist of the Roman Empire,
introduced land and inheritance taxes.
• Augustus Caesar particularly instituted an
inheritance tax to provide retirement funds for the
military.
B. Medieval Period
• Taxation varied from region to region.
• Europeans were subject to many forms of taxation,
including land taxes, poll taxes, inheritance taxes, tolls
(payments for the use of bridges, roads, or seaports),
and miscellaneous fees and fines.
• Many people paid taxes in the form of money or crops
directly to the local lord whose land they farmed.
• The medieval period was characterized by an agricultural
society under a feudalist mode of production.
• In the realm of taxation the period was known for tax
imposition on the peasantry generally by a triple-tier
separately acting authority comprising central kingdom,
local lords, and church.
• scutages (payments that a knight – a man of high social
rank who had duty to fight for his king – made in lieu of
military service)
• aids were monetary payments made by a vassal to an
English feudal lord.
• An annual land tax, called Danegeld
• Danegeld was replaced by a tax called carucate which was
collected only on plowed ground.
• The Roman Catholic Church was a major tax collector
during the Middle Ages as the tithe, a compulsory payment
of one-tenth of a person’s harvest and livestock.
• The church also collected various fees, fines, and tolls.
• Following urbanization urban centers collected revenues
using taxes on property as well as sales taxes on certain
items.
C. Taxes in Modern Period
• Feudalism faded and strong centralized states
emerged in Europe.
• States relied heavily on revenues generated by the
king’s own estates and by taxes on land.
• In England, the power of parliament grew steadily
and the kings and queens had to convene it
frequently to obtain money. In 1689 the English Bill
of Rights guaranteed that the king could not tax
without the parliament’s consent
• By the 18th century, England started imposing various
taxes on transactions. Taxes on imported goods
(tariffs) assumed great importance, as did taxes on a
• In 1799, Britain enacted the first national income
tax
• The first progressive income tax – which imposed a
greater tax burden on people with higher incomes –
was introduced in Prussia (part of present day
Germany) in 1853.
• Half a century later other countries introduced
progressive income taxation in subsequent decades,
including Britain in 1907, the United States in 1913,
and France in 1917.
• Although income taxes generated little revenue at
first, today they play major role in all modern tax
systems.
II. Taxation in Ethiopia
• Taxation co-exists with a state as the latter heavily relies on taxes for
existence. The Ethiopian state is no exception in this regard though there
is no recorded evidence as to what type and how taxes are levied, and for
that evidence is there, the tax system is extremely traditional and
oppressive.
• Different systems of taxes prevailed under the different regimes
The ancient taxation:- could be associated with Aksumite Kingdom and is
similar in essence to the system in renowned ancient regimes elsewhere
on the world.
• kings resorted to compulsory tributes from conquered peoples and
kingdoms, and traditionally compelled subjects to provide compulsory
services to the kingdom.
• Certain particular types of taxes are also believed to have been levied by
the Aksumite. There were taxes on crops, livestock and livestock
products such as butter, milk and wool.
• Taxes on hunting such as ivory, on honey, and on handicraftsmen were
also imposed.
Ethiopia beginning from the Middle Ages up to nearly the late first-half of
the 20th century:- was characterized by a sort of political decentralization
and the tax regime during this period was corollary of this political
tradition.
• Taxation was operated on two levels: at the provincial or regional level by
the respective rulers and at the centre by the power of the “king of kings”.
• Thus, one can easily see the excessive burden on the peasantry as the same
people were subject to payment for the maintenance of both provincial
and imperial authorities.
• The payment of tax was in kind;
• Although agricultural taxes were the major traditional taxes, there were
also other taxes imposed on non-agricultural activities such as taxes on
minerals (salt), on handicraftsmen such as carpenters, blacksmiths,
weavers and tanners.
• Taxes on imports and exports
• The taxes were paid at several stages besides those paid to the emperor
and the provincial rulers. The taxpayers were required to make payment to
local rulers, not to mention compulsory service to the various hierarchical
rulers.
• The Gult and Rest systems
• In addition, the (Ethiopian Orthodox) church simultaneously
imposed a proportion (usually a tenth) of payment, the
tithe (traditionally called asrat), on the same produce.
Modern taxation:- associated with the transformation and
centralization made by Emperor Haile Sellassie I in the
1940’s onwards.
• Not only did the emperor abolish the serfdom landholding
system of feudalism but eliminated regional ruling along
with their taxation powers and centralized political and
fiscal powers.
• Uniform tax legislations were enacted and in kind taxation
was totally left out.
• Taxes were levied on income, property, customs, and
business. Specific laws on excise taxes and customs duties
The derg :-(a military committee) took state power and
proclaimed the official adoption of the socialist politico-economic
ideology.
• The proclamation entailed several eminent changes in the tax
system: some tax laws became obsolete and were replaced by
new ones, others were amended, and new ones were introduced.
• widespread nationalization of urban and rural lands as well as
extra houses
• Thus, land tax, tax on rental income (income from rents of land
and buildings) were abrogated. Health and education taxes were
also rescinded.
• The socialist influence called for the amendment of some of the
tax laws of the time.
• The rate of taxes on income was vigorously raised so that it had a
negative impact on the private accumulation of wealth. Income
tax law was amended to incorporate other sources of income such
as dividends, royalties and receipts from winning games of chance.
• Agricultural income tax and rural land use fee law
were issued.
• The regime was notorious for its surtax law
superimposed on payrolls and business profits.
• Some other fiscal measures were also taken later
on: a law was enacted for the payment of tax on
income from petroleum operations and mining, and
new sales and excise taxes were imposed.
• In general, a strongly centralized tax system that
aimed at discouraging and ultimately eliminating
private ownership of public resources was the
hallmark of the socialist regime.
1991 till now:- Liberalized market was followed by a
reform in the tax regime.
• Involves reduction in the rate of taxation and variation of
income structure.
• Followed by many tax laws
• Sales and excise taxes and customs duties were
reintroduced
• The taxation of capital gains was introduced for the first
time.
• Agricultural income tax and rural land use fee were
assigned to the regional governments
• The existing tax structure is the result of the revenue and
expenditure assignment made after the adoption of a
federal setting as proclaimed in the 1995 Constitution of
3.3. Theories of Taxation
• Theories of taxation deal with the justifications for
imposing tax as a duty in a given country.
A. Expediency Theory
What do you think is the essence of this theory?
• According to this theory in the choice of various tax
proposals, the authorities need not consider various
economic or social objectives or the effects of a tax
system.
• What they have to take into account is whether that
tax proposal is practicable.
• Therefore, for this theory, taxes must be imposed if
B. Socio-Political Theory
• German economist Called Adolph Wagner.
• It is not the expediency but final social and political objectives,
which should be the deciding factors in designing our tax system.
• It did not believe in individualistic approach to a problem. It
always looked at the problem in its social and political context
and made efforts to find an appropriate solution thereof.
• Accordingly, a tax policy should not be designed to serve the
needs of the individual members of the society. It should be used
for the benefit of the society in so far as it is possible.
• In other words, Wagner was advocating a modern welfare
approach to the entire problem of evolving and adopting a tax
policy.
• He particularly favored the idea of using taxation as an important
means of causing reduction of income inequalities in society. In
order to attain this purpose, he stated that all small incomes
C. Benefits Received Theory
• The burden of tax must be imposed in proportion to the
benefits received by a taxpayer from the expenditure
incurred by the government, financed from tax receipts.
• In other words, it means, the relationship between the
taxpayer and the state runs in quid pro quo terms. It is
basically an exchange relationship.
• In this theory, the problem of reducing the income
inequalities is ignored.
• This approach does not also consider the possible use of
the tax policy for achieving economic growth or
economic stability in the country.
• The theory considers only the way in which the goods
and services should be supplied and financed by the
D. Cost of Service Theory
• This approach emphasizes on the semi-commercial
relationship between the state and the taxpayers to a
greater extent.
• The implication is that the taxpayers are not entitled to any
benefits from the state and if they do receive any, they
must pay the cost thereof.
• In this approach, the state is asked to give up its basic
protective and welfare functions unless the taxpayers are
able to directly cover the costs.
• It thoroughly enables the government to recover the cost
of services and therefore, this approach, unlike the benefits
received one, specifically implies a balanced budget policy.
• We notice that the defects of this approach are very similar
to those of the benefits-received approach.
E. Ability to Pay Theory
• This theory considers the tax liability in its true form-a
compulsory payment to the state without quid pro quo.
• It does not assume any commercial or semi-commercial
relationship between the state and the citizens.
• It is based on the broad assumption that those who
possess income or wealth should contribute to the
support of public functions according to their relative
abilities.
• The obligation to pay tax to the government is taken as a
social or collective responsibility although the questions
of ‘who shall pay and in what amount’ is necessarily an
individual one.
• Those who have the means to pay should pay and those
3.4. Incidence and Shiftability of Taxation
• The previous section was devoted to the broad
theoretical aspects that may have to be used for
designing a tax system in which the resulting burdens
are distributed among members of the society.
• A statutorily liable economic unit for the payment of
a tax may collect a part or whole of the tax from
others because each economic unit is related to
others through various economic transactions.
• There are three terms used to describe the
corresponding concepts, which are nevertheless
interrelated, in the process of tax shifting: impact,
incidence, and effects of a tax.
A. The impact of a tax
• refers to the tax’s first point of contact with the
taxpayers.
• It is the immediate or original place of the tax and it
falls upon those who bear the legal responsibility of
paying the tax to the authorities.
• It is a general reference to those who have the
statutory liability of paying the tax to the
government.
• Refers to the case of persons bearing the initial
financial burden of paying the tax on their income
or wealth.
B. Incidence of a tax
• Incidence of a tax is its final resting place,
where the ultimate burden lies.
• It falls upon those economic units which
finally bear the money burden of a tax and
which are not able to pass it on to others.
• In other words, incidence lies upon that final
source from which the tax money comes.
• Eg:- Consumers in sales taxes, excise taxes and
customs duties
• Any particular tax is likely to be borne by a large
number of economic units.
• The task of shifting is also likely to pass through
several stages so that the final burden gets well
scattered.
• when there is shifting (as is in the majority of
cases), the money burden of a tax can be shifted,
partially or fully, only through the instrumentality
of price variations.
• Tax shifting can be demonstrated by a comparison
of the statutory incidence and economic incidence
points of a tax. If the two points are the same, the
burden rests ultimately where it initially falls, and
tax shifting, i.e. transference of the tax burden
C. Effects of a tax
• Effects of a tax are the responses of taxpayers and the
economy and their results.
• The effects stand apart from both the impact and
incidence of the tax both conceptually and analytically.
• All about the resultant responses and changes in the
economy.
• The effects could result from the fact of tax imposition
itself – at first instance – and they could also follow
from the process of shifting its incidence – at final
instance.
• For example, the minimum effects of a tax at its
imposition will be the reduction in the disposable
income (income for use by the beneficiary) of the
taxpayers, and if the tax is shifted, at least some prices
• Effects of a tax can be both beneficial and harmful.
• The harmful effect is the burden of that tax. Such a burden
would have two dimensions: money burden and real
burden.
• The money burden:- is the reduction in the disposable
income of the taxpayers. This is either direct in reference to
the amount of tax being paid to the authorities (equal to
the tax collection) or indirect in reference to the additional
expenses incurred by the taxpayers in the course of
discharging their tax responsibilities, as where a taxpayer
might have to go to the treasury to deposit the tax amount
due and incur some expenses on conveyance and transport.
• The real burden:- refers to effects of a tax in terms of
increasing unemployment, reduced production, etc. It is
equal to the loss of welfare to the taxpayers and the
Forward and Backward Shifting
• A tax may be shifted either through a sale
transaction or through a purchase transaction,
inducing change in price in both cases.
A. forward shifting incidence:- occurs through
increase in prices in a sale transaction, as when a
producer, selling products, collects a portion of the
tax imposed from customers and shifting a portion
of the tax burden forward along the channel of the
product’s transaction.
• It involves the transfer of tax burden to a consumer
of a good through the rise in the price of the
economic good in a product market.
B. Backward shifting:- occurs as a result of a decrease
in prices in purchase transactions, as when a
producer obtains the reduction of the purchase price
of raw materials from the supplier in compensation
of his tax liability, shifting the tax backward along the
transaction channel.
• In other words, backward shifting involves the
transfer of tax burden to owner of a factor of
production through reduction in the price of the
productive resource in a factor market.
• It is not a necessity that a tax must be shifted only
forward or backward. It can shift partly in each
direction, depending on the sales or purchases
transactions involved and the market forces at work
3.5. Classification of Taxation
• Based on burden of a tax
• Based on the relationship between the tax
base and the tax rate
• Based on tax amount determinants
• Based on number of taxes in the economy
• Based on the number of tax type against a
product
• Based on sources of taxes
3.5.1. Direct and Indirect Taxes
• It is classification on the basis of the possibility of shifting the
incidence
Direct tax:
• if the taxpayer who has the statutory responsibility also bears
the final burden of paying it , the ultimate burden falls on the
very person on whom the tax is legally levied.
• there is a coincidence of impact and incidence
• Income taxes (both personal and corporate), inheritance tax, gift
tax and property tax
Indirect tax:
• the incidence falls somewhere else (if the burden is shifted)
• the burden is shifted to somebody else who is not legally
required to pay the tax and the tax is imposed on a taxpayer in
the expectation and intention that he shall indemnify himself at
the expense of another person. Sales taxes and excise taxes.
• In the case of direct taxes ability is determined
with direct reference to the taxpaying ability
of the taxpayer,
• while in the case of indirect taxes such an
ability is assessed indirectly with regard to the
purchaser rather than the seller.
Merits and Demerits of Direct Taxes
I. Merits
• They provide the most acceptable measure of
ability to pay.
• Hence, they are better instruments of social and
economic justice.
• Canon of certainty is meaningfully applied to
them. Because direct taxes enable the
government to know the exact tax amount paid by
each person.
• As direct they are, their knowability by taxpayers
gives them the power to inculcate civic
responsibility into the minds of citizens.
II. Demerits
• with the awareness of tax liability they create
on the taxpayers, suffer simultaneously from
evasion.
• They entail the necessity of detailed
assessment. As their imposition is very
meticulous, they entail higher cost of levying.
• are levied at the cost of violating the canon of
convenience. There is no payment in
installments, in bits.
Merits and Demerits of Indirect Taxes
I. Merits
• are hidden in the prices of goods and services
& not felt by the taxpayers.
• accompanied by less chance of evasion.
• They are less inconvenient b/c the taxpayer,
still, can choose not to pay the tax by choosing
not to consume.
• Indirect taxes are flexible. Their rates and
coverage can be quite selective and can be
modified more readily to suit the occasion.
II. Demerits
• violates vertical equity in taxation; negates
ability-to-pay principle & unfair to the poor.
• They feed inflationary forces. Indirect taxes
begin by adding to the sale prices of taxed
goods reducing the value of the money.
3.5.2. Ad valorem and Specific Taxes
• This classification is based on determinant of the tax amount,
i.e., its value or quantity
Ad valorem: The tax amount is to be determined according to the
value of the item being taxed.
• Direct taxes are virtually ad valorem taxes. Eg: Income Tax
• Sales taxes, for example, are ad valorem b/s the tax is imposed
based on how much the amount of sale in money terms is.
Specific Taxes: it is imposed per item,
• the numerical quantity of the taxable item itself is considered;
• when the tax is levied on per unit basis, the unit of
measurement of the taxable item (such as bottles, packages,
quintals, etc) would be considered. Excise taxes are mostly
specific
The advantage of an ad valorem tax
• the tax automatically gets hinged on to the
value of item and would move along with its
value.
• Equitable: it accommodate changes in price
• Higher revenue at time of inflation
Demerits
• Possibility of evasion
• Uncertain revenue
• Inconvenient
o Specific taxes on their part are easy to levy and
convenient to collect.
3.5.3. Proportional, Progressive and Regressive Taxation
i) Financial Objectives
ii) Macroeconomic Objectives: allocative, redistributive
and stabilization
• The allocation objective refers to the production and
provision of public goods and services, which needs
financing through taxation.
• Redistributive objective aims at reduction of income
and wealth inequalities through the adoption of
progressive taxation, among other things.
• It requires the imposition of heavy tax on the rich,
lighter tax on the relatively poor, and negative tax on
the very poor.
Negative taxation means transferring wealth to the
poor through subsidization.
Stabilization is the objective to keep stable level of
price and employment through the use of various
instruments including taxation, as seen earlier.
iii) Miscellaneous Functions
• Enhancement of Capital Formation
• Promotion and redirection of Private Investment
• To reduce Regional imbalances
• Utilization of Scarce Resources for the Production
and Provision of more Essential Goods
• Realization of Import Substitution and
Encouragement of Exports
• Discouraging the Consumption of Harmful Products
3.7. Principles of Taxation
Focus
• The Ethiopian constitutional principles of taxation
• Certain features of federal tax legislations in Ethiopia
4.1. Constitutional Principles of Taxation
• For a meaningful and operative federalism,
there are certain general principles of fiscal
power allocation that may significantly differ
from those of unitary systems.
• Article 95: the central government and the
states are to share revenue taking the federal
arrangement into account.
• Articles 96 and 97 distributes exclusive powers
of taxation to the federal government and to
the states respectively.
• Article 98: concurrent powers of taxation over
certain jointly held taxable units.
• Article 99: requires constitutionally
undesignated tax sources to be made explicit
through decision by the joint session of the
two Federal Houses.
• Article 100 of FDRE Constitution contain
important guidelines /basic principles/ of
taxation in a federal governmental
arrangement in Ethiopia. [which is our focus]
A. Principle of relatedness
Both states and the federal government, in
exercising their tax powers, are supposed to ensure
any tax they are going to levy and collect is related
to the source of the revenue taxed [100(1)].
It is all about tax jurisdiction.
B. Principle of legality
Both levels of government to ensure that the tax is
determined following “proper
considerations”[Ibid]. “proper considerations”
probably include concern for neutrality of the tax,
the ability to pay of subjects and equitable
distribution of material resources of the
community, among other things.
C. Principle of Commensurability:
the commensurability of taxes (in terms of
both rate and base) with services the taxes
help deliver.[100(2)]
It reveals the intention of fiscal adequacy for
the government to finance its activities.
• It intends to prohibit any appropriation
through taxation in excess of the amount
necessary to deliver services for the common
good even if there still remains an amount in
the economy available for taxation.
• protect private interests from over-taxation
D. Principle of adverse impact limitation
Both levels of government in the federation must
ensure that taxation does not adversely affect
their relationship.[100(2)]
• It advocates for vertical harmony of tax structure
between the federal and state administrations
and, by inference, horizontal harmony of tax
system among the states as well.
E. Principle of inter-jurisdictional immunity from
taxation:
Urges for the exemption from taxation of property
belonging to one level of government by the other
unless it is a profit-making enterprise.[ Art 100(3)]
4.2. Fiscal federalism and revenue sharing
under the Ethiopian Constitution
Art 96 : Exclusive tax power of the federal
government
• Custom duties, taxes & other charges on imports &
exports
• Income tax on employees of the federal gov’t &
international organizations
• Income, profit, sales & excise taxes on Enterprises
owned by the federal gov’t
• Income & winnings of national lotteries & other games
of chance
•
• Taxes on income of houses & properties
owned by the federal gov’t. Rents ???
• Fees & Charges relating to licenses issued &
services rendered by organs of the fed. Gov’t
• Taxes on monopolies
• Fed. Stump duties
Art 97: State Power of Taxation
• Income taxes on employees of the state & private
enterprises
• Fees for land usufractuary
• Taxes on the incomes of private farmers & their
cooperative associations
• Profit & sales taxes on ind’l traders within their territory
• Taxes on income from transport services rendered on
interior water bodies
• Taxes on income derived from private houses &other
properties within the state. Rent on houses & other
properties
• Profit, sales, excise & personal income taxes
on income of enterprises owned by states
• Taxes on income of small scale minnings
• Fees & Charges relating to licenses issued &
services rendered by them
• Royalties for use of forest resources
Art 98: Concurrent Power of Taxation
• Profit, sales, excise & personal income taxes on jointly
established enterprises
• Taxes on profits of companies & on dividends due to
shareholders
• Taxes on income of large scale mining
Art 99: Undesignated tax power
• የኢፌዲሪ 2ኛው የህዝብ ተወካዮችና የፌዴሬሽን ምክር ቤቶች 2ኛ
ዓመት የስራ ዘመን 2ኛ የጋራ ስብሰባ ቃለጉባዔ፣ሚያዚያ3/1994
ዓ.ም.፣አዲስ አበባ፣ ገጽ2-6
Can you list instances?
What about VAT?
How would you explain Scope of the taxation
• Not limited to taxation
• Include revenues other the taxes
• Include both levying & collecting
How do you see division of taxation power
with division non tax power? Appreciate the
difference
4.3. Ethiopian tax laws: organization and
characteristics
4.3.1. Direct Taxes
A. Income Tax
• Levied & collected by both the federal & regional
gov’ts on case by case basis
• Agricultural income tax
• Federal Income Tax Proclamation No. 979/2016
i. Schedule A: Employment income tax
• Always progressive Art 11
ii. Schedule B: Rental income tax
• Progressive on ind’ls Art 14 (2)
• Proportional on bodies 30% Art 14(1)
iii. Schedule C: Business income tax
• Progressive on ind’ls Art 19 (2)
• Proportional on bodies 30% Art 19(1)
iv. Schedule D: Other income tax
• Art 51 ff
v. Schedule E: Exempted income
• Art 65 ff
B. Property tax
C. Stump Duties
4.3.2. Indirect Taxes
A. VAT
• Only by the federal government
• የኢፌዲሪ 2ኛው የህዝብ ተወካዮችና የፌዴሬሽን ምክር ቤቶች 2ኛ
ዓመት የስራ ዘመን 2ኛ የጋራ ስብሰባ ቃለጉባዔ፣ሚያዚያ3/1994
ዓ.ም.፣አዲስ አበባ፣ ገጽ2-6
Is it Constitutional?
• But regional governments are delegated
• Avoid cascading effect of sales tax
• Supply of registered persons
• Threshold: annual turnover more than 1million birr
• Regular tax rate:15%
• Exempted transaction
•
B. ToT
• Applicable on suppliers not registered for VAT
• Both by the federal & regional governments
• Known for having cascading effect
• Regular tax rate
Goods: 2%
Services 2% & 10%
• Exempted transaction
• Zero rating not applied
C. Customs duty
• Only by the federal government
• Basically aimed at:-
Discouraging importation
Protecting infant domestic industries
Generating revenue to the government
• Hence, it is known to be huge & exaggerated
• Targeted on imports only
D. Excise Tax
• Imposed on unwanted & luxurious products &
demand inelastic supplies
• Imposed on imported & domestically
produced supplies
Certain Features Enshrined in Federal Tax Legislations
A. Scope Art 3
• about 19 major goods
B. Tax Base Art 5
C. Tax Rate Art 4
• duty of taxpayers article 8, and
• articles 9-11 state the powers that the tax
authority
• Ibid TOT
6.4. Customs Duty
• A tax imposed on imported or exported goods
• FDRE Constitution has explicitly given the federal
government the power to levy and collect customs
duties owing to their international character
• Proclamation No. 587/2008 has merged the
Ethiopian Customs Authority with Ministry of
Revenue and the Federal Inland Revenue Authority
and established the Ethiopian Revenues and
Customs Authority.
• The Customs Proclamation No. 622/2009 has also
many important provisions concerning customs
duty