Scribd
Upload
6 views

Component 1 - Written Exam (Lesson 6) Analysis and Evaluation of Arguments

Uploaded by

moghalu.chuka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

Component 1 - Written Exam (Lesson 6) Analysis and Evaluation of Arguments

Uploaded by

moghalu.chuka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

IGCSE Global Perspectives

Component 1 – Written Exam

(Lesson 6)
Analysis and evaluation of
arguments
Learning objective
Identify and describe the argument which is more convincing?

Success criteria
1. All will be able to identify the most convincing argument
2. Most will be able to describe the strength of their reasoning
using evidence from the insert
3. Some can explain reasons why their view is the most acceptable
Starter: Watch the video and analyse the strength
and weakness of grace and seth argument
Identify the

strength and

weaknesses in

Grace and Seth

argument
keywords
1.Fact- a verifiable piece of information
2.Opinion- a view or judgement formed about something,
not necessarily based on fact or knowledge
3.Value judgement– assessment of the rightness or
wrongness of something // defined as a view or belief
about what is important/ethical/moral/right or wrong.
4.Claim- an assertion that something is true, can be based
on facts or cannot be based off facts
5.Prediction- attempts to forsee or say what will happen
in the future
6.anecdote is a short and often personal or humorous story
How to analyse and evaluate
argument

Use the next 7 minute to read the


meaning of these statements
The strength of reasoning (LSBC)

logic: the statements offered as evidence)


logically support the conclusion.
structure: argument has a clear and coherent
flow, with premises leading to a logically supported
conclusion.
balance: implies considering opposing viewpoints
claims: Claims are the central statements
presented in an argument
Evidence
Range of information and depth: It's important to draw from
diverse sources to avoid bias and provide detail information about
the topic
Relevance: is the evidence directly related to the topic
Sufficiency sample: There should be an adequate amount of
data, examples, or information to make a compelling case.
Source – media; internet
Date – how recent
Different types of information – fact, opinion, value,
anecdote
Testimony – from experience and expert
Use of language

• TONE
Emotive Tone: Emotive language is used to evoke emotions or
feelings in the audience.
Exaggerated Tone: Exaggerated language involves using hyperbole
or extreme descriptions to emphasize a point.
Precise Tone: A precise tone involves using language that is clear,
specific, and free from unnecessary embellishments.
• CLARITY
Clarity in language means using words and expressions that are
easily understood by the intended audience.
Sources of bias/vested interest
• Local interest bias occurs when individuals or organizations favor or
prioritize a particular outcome or decision because it benefits their
specific geographical area or community.
• Economic bias arises when individuals, organizations, or entities are
influenced by financial considerations, leading them to make
decisions or advocate for policies that serve their economic interests.
• Personal values bias occurs when individuals allow their own moral
or ethical beliefs to influence their decisions or positions, even when
those values may not align with the preferences or needs of others.
• Political bias occurs when individuals shows partiality towards a
particular political ideology, party, or viewpoint.
Acceptability of their values to others:

How likely other


people are to
agree with their
perspective/view
and
Possible
consequences of
the ideas
presented
Note

• Just describe the strength and weaknesses of person 1


and 2 argument and from the strength and weakness
you justify which is more convincing based on the one
that has more strength.

That’s all
Answer the question (16 marks)
Mark sure you apply the criteria's
you read
Sample answer

Read examiner sample


answer

Write down how you would have improve


your work based on the examiners feedback

You might also like