Ob Perception Final
Ob Perception Final
PERCEPTION
Chapter-5 2
Chapter-5 3
Parallel Lines?
http://psycharts.com/opt_illus.html
http://psycharts.com/opt_illus.html
http://psycharts.com/opt_illus.html
Any movement you see is an illusion!
http://psycharts.com/opt_illus.html
Shimmer
http://psycharts.com/opt_illus.html
Chapter-5 9
Hermann Grid
http://www.at-bristol.org.uk/Optical/Hermann_main.htm
Meaning of Perception
Time
Example:
Which you can read fast?
Performance Expectations:
There are lots of evidence which indicates that people attempt to
validate their perceptions of reality, even those perceptions are faulty. For
e.g.: if a managers expects big things from his people, but the subordinate
are not likely to do so. In this situation the manager tend to make negative
perception towards the subordinates and vice versa.
Performance evaluation:
An employees performance appraisal person are very
much dependent on the perceptual process. Although the
factor appraisal can be objective , many jobs are evaluated
in subjective terms. Subjective measures are easier to
implement. They provide managers with greater discretion,
and many jobs do not readily provide themselves to
objective measures.
Employee effort:
An individual’s future in an organization is usually not
dependent on perception alone. It also depends on their level
of efforts. The judgment susceptible to perceptual distortions
and bias.
Common shortcuts in judging others
Selective perception
People selectively interpret what they see
on the basis of their interests, background, experience
and attitudes.
Halo effect
Tendency to draw a general impression
about an individual on the basis of a
single characteristic.
• Halo effect is just like 1st impression is
Last impression
• Like people having good quality and
dislike those who have bad qualities.
People may be judged by their work not
by their dress
• People may be judged by their result not
by their attendance
Contrast effect Evaluation of a
person’s characteristic that is affected by
comparisons with other people recently
encountered who rank higher or lower on the
same characteristic.
Stereotyping
Judging someone on the basis of one’s
perception of
The group to which that person belongs.
Projection
Attributing’ one’s own characteristic to other
people
Attribution Theory
Attribution theory is important for organizations because it can
help managers understand some of the causes of employee
behavior and can assist employees in understanding their
thinking about their own behaviors. If you can understand why
you behave a certain way, and why others around you do so, then
you have a better understanding of yourself, others, and your
organization. The perception of the causes of a certain behavior
may affect the judgment and actions of both managers and
employees. It may also play a significant role in motivation.
Fritz Heider put forward his theories of attribution in his 1958
book The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Heider
was interested in examining how individuals determine whether
another person's behavior is internally caused or externally
caused.
Attribution theory attempts to explain some of the causes of our
behavior. According to the theory, you want to be able to
understand the reason for the actions you take and understand the
reasons behind the actions other people take. You want to
attribute causes to these behaviors, which should give you some
felling of control over your own behaviors and related situations.
Internal cause: Internal causes are those factors that are
attributed to the person being observed. Internal causes are
usually controllable. For example, a co-worker just received
a promotion. You believe the reason for her promotion was
her hard work, dedication, and skills. You have thus
attributed internal causes to her promotion.
When there are low levels of consensus and distinctiveness, but high consistency, we’re
more likely to decide the behavior is due to something about the person. For example,
let's imagine that you’re trying to figure out why your friend Carly likes to go sky-diving:
None of your other friends likes to go sky-diving (low consensus)
Carly likes many other high-adrenaline activities (low distinctiveness)
Carly has been sky-diving many times and she's always had a great time (high
consistency)
Taken together, this information suggests that Carly's behavior (her love of sky-diving) is
the result of an inherent characteristic of Carly's (being a thrill-seeker), rather than a
situational aspect of the act of sky-diving.
Attribution Errors
Fundamental attribution error is best defined as the tendency of a
person to overestimate the influence of personal factors and
underestimate the influence of situational or environmental factors
when assessing an individual’s behavior. In specific, when observing
behavior, a supervisor is more likely to assume that a worker’s behavior
is primarily caused by the individual and not by the situation. This error
causes managers to assume that an employees’ poor performance is due
to a lack of ability or effort rather than to task difficulty, luck, or other
external factors.
self-serving bias is the tendency of an individual to
attribute positive outcomes with internal factors and
negative outcomes with external factors. For example, an
employee may attribute a promotion to effort and
dedication, thus internal factors of the employee. But in
contrast, the same employee may attribute failure to meet
a deadline with unreasonable time frames, understaffing,
or failure of other team members to work hard (Trevino,
1999).
Other perpetual Error
Selective perception
Halo effect
Contrast effect
Stereotyping
Projection
Primacy and regency effect