Change Management
Change Management
G e m e c h i s
Desta
CHANGE Leadstar
Graduate
Department of
MANAGEMENT Leadership
Studies
Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia
1.Organizational
Structure
Coordina
Authority ting
Relations mechanis
12/09/2024
ms
Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 5
THREE PILLARS IN
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
Organizational Structure
Coordinating
Authority Relations
mechanisms
Technology
Work Process
Information and
communication
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 6
THREE PILLARS IN
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
Organizational Structure
Authority Relations Coordinating mechanisms
Technology
Information and
Work Process
communication
People
Human capacity Human behavior
Exter Intern
nal al
Factor Factor
s s
Factors
of
Change
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 8
EXTERNAL FORCES FOR CHANGE
Technology
•Internationalization
•Access to information
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 9
EXTERNAL FORCES FOR CHANGE
Technolog Governme
y nt
•Globaliz •Legal
Regulation
ation •Deregulatio
•Access n
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 10
EXTERNAL FORCES FOR CHANGE
Technolog Governme
Economics
y nt
•Regula •Up and
•Global down
tion
ization •Dereg
effect
•Access •Global
ulation impact
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 11
INTERNAL FORCES FOR CHANGE
Strategy
Internal structure
Operational Methodology
Operational
Capacity building
Methodology
Change management as a
result of changing
technologies
Bottom
Top down
Up
Best
•Business Process
exampl
re-engineering
e of Top
(BPR)
down •Business re-
manage engineering
ment
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 21
BPR
The concept of BPR is aimed at changes concerning
quality, service, cost and processing time
The core idea is process orientation
BPR takes two things into consideration;
1. Strategy creation
2. Process creation
Best
example •Kaizen
of •Lean
Bottom
Up managemen
manage t
ment
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 24
KAIZEN
1. Gradual approach
2. Group Orientation
3. Own responsibility
Understanding
Understanding people
organizations that are
who are ready for change
ready for change
Understanding Understanding
Understanding
organizations comprehensive
people who are
that are ready dynamics of
ready for change
for change change
Simple
organiz
• Will reach a simple
ational dynamic environment
structur
e
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 33
ADHOCRACY-MORE DEMOCRACY
AND LESS BUREAUCRACY
Simple
•Will reach a simple
organization dynamic environment
al structure
Change
Unfreezing Freezing
Three
stage
model
ch
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 42
CHIN AND BENNE’S “EFFECTING
CHANGES IN HUMAN SYSTEM”
approa
policies and legislation 3.
Electing people into political
office
ch
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 43
CHIN AND BENNE’S “EFFECTING
CHANGES IN HUMAN SYSTEM”
Planning
Action
Exploratio Integratio
n n
Phases of
Planned
change
The cost of
Change must
be out
weighed by;
mSstyleSkillsst S
r
sete aff h
Sty
u v a ar
u c lu ed
es
gy
r
St
te
ra
St
Initiatin
g
1. Thoughtful planning
2. Sensitive implementation
3. Consultation and involvement of people aff ected
by those changes
Imposing
D
e
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
w
h
e
n
r
e
a
l
i
z
i
n
g
n
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
o
l
d
i
s
g
o
i
n
g
t
o
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
b
a
ri
e
r
s
8
.
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
W h a t i s c o n fl i c t ?
Va n d e V l i e r t ( 1 9 8 4 ) ke y e l e m e n t s i n d e fi n i n g o r g a n i z a t i o n a l c o n fl i c t
1. Confl ict occurs when at least one party in the confl ict episode/period experiences
frustration
2. Recognition that frustration can be both aff ective and cognitive
3. Frustration is subjective and does not necessarily refl ect objective reality
4. Confl ict and individuals reaction to feeling frustration are independent events.
Such a list implies interaction and dependence between confl icting parties the
blockage of at least one party’s concerns
or interests: the perception of incompatibility of individual concerns or interests , and
the ability to manage confl it by applying appropriate confl ict handling behavior.
Organizational confl ict is a disagreement between two or more organization members
or groups arising from the fact that they must engage in independence work
activities and/or from the fact that they have diff erent status, goals, values,
perception.
Confl ict is an overt /obvious behavior that results when an individual or group of
individuals thinks a perceived need or needs of the individual or group of individuals
has been frustrated/ unfulfi lled or is about or to be frustrated
Confl ict is a process that begins when one party perceives that another party has
negatively aff ected, or is about to negatively aff ect, something that the fi rst party
cares about.
L i t t e re r ( 1 9 6 9 , p . 3 8 2 )
C o n fl i c t i s a t y p e o f b e h a v i o r w h i c h o c c u r s w h e n t w o o r m o re p a r t i e s a re i n
o p p o s i t i o n a s a re s u l t o f a p e rc e i v e d re l a t i v e d e p r i v a t i o n / d e n i a l f ro m a c t i v i t i e s
of or interacting with another
Type of confl ict can be 6 in number on the other hand it can
be closely 3
a . I n t r a p e r s o n a l c o n fl i c t
b . I n t e r p e r s o n a l c o n fl i c t
c . I n t e r g ro u p c o n fl i c t
T h e re a re a l s o s p e c i fi c a l l y 3 t y p e s o f c o n fl i c t , a n o t h e r a p p ro a c h o f c l a s s i fy i n g
c o n fl i c t
1 . Ta s k c o n fl i c t re l a t e s t h e c o n t e n t a n d g o a l s o f t h e w o r k .
2 . re l a t i o n s h i p c o n fl i c t f o c u s e s i n t e r p e r s o n a l re l a t i o n s h i p . I t i s a l m o s t
d y s f u n c t i o n a l . T h i s i s b e c a u s e t h e f r i c t i o n a n d i n t e r p e r s o n a l h o s t i l i t i e s i n h e re n t
i n re l a t i o n s h i p c o n fl i c t i n c re a s e p e r s o n a l i t y c l a s h e s a n d d e c re a s e m u t u a l
u n d e r s t a n d i n g w h i c h h i n d e r s t h e c o m p l e t i o n o f o rg a n i z a t i o n t a s k s . O n t h e o t h e r
h a n d l o w l e v e l s o f p ro c e s s c o n fl i c t a n d l o w t o m o d e r a t e l e v e l o f t a s k c o n fl i c t
a re f u n c t i o n a l
3 . . p ro c e s s t y p e o f c o n fl i c t re l a t e s t o h o w t h e w o r k g e t s d o n e . .
p
e
r
c
e
i
v
e
d
b
y
p
a
rti
e
s
t
o
it,
o
t
h
e
r
w
a
y
s
it
d
o
e
s
n
’t
e
x
i
s
t
3
.
S
o
m
e
k
i
n
d
o
f
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
m
u
s
t
t
a
k
e
p
l
a
c
e
Relations accepted
•Conflict may even benefit group
performance
View
12/09/2024 Copy right @ Leadstar, Dr. Gemechis Desta 76
THE NATURE OF CONFLICT
6 . R o l e A m b i g u i t y – a m b i g u i t y i n t h e d e s c ri p t i o n of a p a rt i c u l a r j o b
c a n l e a d t o s t r u c t u r a l c on fl i c t
7 . C o m m o n R e s o u r c e D e pe n d e n c e – w h e n t w o org a n i z a t i o n a l
u n i t s a re d e p e n d e n t o n c o m m o n b u t s c a re s re s ou rc e s , p ot e n t i a l f o r
c o n fl i c t ex i s t s
8 . C o m m u n i c a t i o n B a r r i e r s – S e m a n t i c d i ff e re n c e s c a n c a u s e
c o n fl i c t
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
c
o
n
f
li
c
t
w
a
it
n
g
f
o
r
c
o
n
d
it
o
n
s
2
.
C
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
b
e
c
o
m
i
n
g
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
v
e
l
y
a
n
d
e
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
a
w
a
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
.
E
a
c
h
o
f
t
h
e
t
w
o
p
a
r
t
i
e
s
m
a
y
a
t
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
s
i
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
u
n
j
u
s
t
i
f
i
a
b
l
e
a
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
.
E
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
y
t
a
k
e
t
h
e
f
o
r
m
o
f
a
n
g
e
r
,
h
o
s
t
i
l
i
t
y
,
f
r
u
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
x
i
e
t
y
o
r
p
a
i
n
.
3
.
C
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
i
n
a
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
b
e
c
o
m
e
s
o
v
e
r
t
/
o
p
e
n
a
n
d
p
a
r
t
i
e
s
i
m
p
l
i
c
i
t
l
y
o
r
e
x
p
l
i
c
i
t
l
y
c
h
o
o
s
e
t
o
a
c
t
t
o
r
e
s
o
l
v
e
o
r
e
s
c
a
l
a
t
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
Conflict Resolution
Conflict – disruptive
/upsetting to organization
2 . A p p e a l t o s u p e r- o r d i n a t e G o a l s – I f t h e s i t u a t i o n s c a u s i n g e x c e s s i v e c o n fl i c t a r e d i ffi c u l t t o
c h a n g e , m a n g e r s s o m e t i m e a r e a b l e r e f o c u s t h e c o n fl i c t i n g i n d i v i d u a l , g r o u p , p a r t i e s o n s u p e r-
ordinate goals , major common goals that require the support of all parties. This takes wisely
choosing that super ordinate goal.
3 . I n t e r p e r s o n a l c o n fl i c t h a n d l i n g m o d e – t h e r e a r e fi v e m o d e s t o b e u s e d ;
Av o i d a n c e / e v a d i n g i g n o r i n g o r s u p p r e s s i n g a c o n fl i c t i n t h e h o p e t h a t i t w i l l e i t h e r g o a w a y o r
not become too disruptive /troublesome
A c c o m m o d a t i o n - f o c u s o n s o l v i n g c o n fl i c t b y a l l o w i n g t h e d e s i r e s o f t h e o t h e r p a r t y t o p r e v a i l
/ c o n q u e r. E s s e n t i a l l y t h e m a n a g e r v o l u n t a r i l y l e t s t h e o t h e r p a r t y h a v e h i s o r h e r w a y o t h e r t h a n
c o n t i n u e t h e c o n fl i c t ( u s e w h e n y o u fi n d y o u ' r e w r o n g .
C o m p e t i t i o n / r i v a l r y - A t t e m p t i n g t o w i n t h e c o n fl i c t a t t h e o t h e r p a r t y e x p e n s e s i n o t h e r w o r d s
one party win the other loss. Note that the extreme case of competition is authoritarianism
( forcing or dominance) a party that feels it must win at any cost using aggregation.( use it when
quick divisive action is vital and e.g. emergency, cost cutting, discipline and when you're right)
C o m p r o m i s e / g i v e a n d t a k e - I t o f t e n b a r g a i n i n g / n e g o t i a t i n g b y c o n fl i c t i n g p a r t i e s a t l e a s t i n n o
w o r s e p o s i t i o n a f t e r t h e c o n fl i c t r e s o l v e d . w i t h c o m p r o m i s e e a c h p e r s o n w i n s s o m e m a j o r i s s u e s
and losses others. (use it when goals are important)
C o l l a b o r a t i o n / g r o u p e ff o r t - s t r i v e s t o r e s o l v e c o n fl i c t s b y d e v i s i n g s o l u t i o n t h a t a l l o w b o t h
parties to achieve their desired outcomes. Both parties win at least their major issues .
Collaboration involves considerable creativity in developing solution that suit the need of both
p a r t i e s i n t h e c o n fl i c t . T h e t e c h n i q u e i s s o m e t i m e c a l l e d p r o b l e m s o l v i n g . I t i s a n a d v a n t a g e o u s
w a y t o h a n d l e c o n fl i c t b / c b o t h p a r t i e s a r e l i k e l y t o b e s a t i s fi e d t h e r e f r e q u e n t l y a r e r e a s o n s t o
use the other opportunity as well ( use when you want learn and seek integrated solution).