Language thought and communication
Language thought and communication
Introduction
Non-verbal communication
Outline schema
Success criteria :-
Young children
Children only understand words when they have reached the correct stage of
development and are ready. This means that the child had to be developmentally ready to
understand the true meaning of the concept. If they do learn the word before the stage
then it is mere repetition
They can have language without understanding but will not be able to use it effectively.
Activity – 5 min
Challenge:
• Use your Ipad to find researches that support your
claim.
Sensorimotor stage: Children speak towards the end of their first year. Before this they
are learning to coordinate motor and sensory information. Here they understand the
concept/idea of language before they use it.
Pre-operational stage: From 2 years they talk about things not present or physical in
nature eg feelings. Language is egocentric in nature
Logical thinking
Concrete operational stage: By 7 children’s language becomes mature and logical as they
question things and create their own ideas.
3. Describe one example of how language might influence thought according to the
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.
Success criteria :-
According to Sapir and Whorf, Language comes first and thought afterwards. Here words
influence thoughts/memories/perception.
The strong version - one which believes words determine our thoughts
The weak version - one which says they influence them.
Another person will present the evidence for the strong version of hypothesis
provided by Franz.
One person will explain the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. What the
hypothesis was.
Another person will provide evidence for the weak version hypothesis.
This version argues that - If there are no words for a thought, object or idea then you
can’t think about it.
This is why it is difficult to translate ideas from one language to another.
Implication:
• The presence of these numerous terms indicates that the Inuit people experience and
think about snow in a way that is detailed and nuanced, which might be challenging for
speakers of languages with only one or a few words for snow to fully grasp. This
supports the idea that language can shape and constrain thought by providing specific
categories and distinctions that influence perception and memory.
Whorf argued that the Hopi people in Arizona don’t conjugate verbs into past, present,
and future tenses as English speakers do and that their words for units of time (like “day”
or “hour”) were verbs rather than nouns.
From this, he concluded that the Hopi don’t view time as a physical object that can be
counted out in minutes and hours the way English speakers do. Instead, Whorf argued,
the Hopi view time as a formless process.
This was then taken by others to mean that the Hopi don’t have any concept of time—an
extreme view that has since been repeatedly disproven.
Want to know the latest?
Facebook GEMS Winchester School Dubai Official
Language and thought
Weak version: Language influences thought
• This version says, language only influences the way one thinks but does not completely
determine what you think. Words help to ‘carve up’ the world. However, you can still
imagine something with no words for it.
While language provides frameworks and tools for thinking, it does not entirely confine
or restrict our cognitive abilities. We can still conceptualize and imagine ideas that may
not have direct linguistic representations.
For instance, Inuit languages have specific terms for different types of snow, such as “fine
snow carried by the wind” or “wet falling snow.” An English speaker might not have these
exact terms, but they can still imagine and understand these types of snow based on
context and description.
Explanation:
• Even though English does not have specific words for every type of snow that Inuit
languages do, English speakers can still conceptualize the different types of snow
through descriptive language and context. This shows that while language can facilitate
and shape thinking, it does not wholly limit it. People can imagine or understand
concepts without having a specific word for them.
The researchers preferred the weaker version. If the words we have for a concept or idea
are limited, our ability to notice or recall that idea will be limited. This supports the
weaker version
Activity – 5 min
Success criteria :-
Whorf studied Native American cultures to investigate whether language influences the
way people think. He was particularly interested in the Hopi Native Americans
This further lead to experiments that showed how language affects recall of events
Here the Native American group Zuni were studies. Other studies is the one on Bermino
people had similar results
Whorf compared Hopi language to English, French and Italian. Hopi language doesn’t
distinguish between past, present and future and was described as a timeless language.
Eg instead of saying ‘I left after a week’ they would say ‘I left on the 7 th day’.
Whorf concluded saying this influences the way they think about time.
Carmichael et al. gave two groups of participants the same pictures but each
group heard different descriptions. When they were asked to draw them from
memory, the pictures drawn reflected the labels they had heard.
This suggests that language influences memory.
Evaluation:A weakness with research on different cultures is that there are issues with
the interpretation of participants’ responses.
The language barrier could have affected how well the Zuni people communicated their
understanding of colour to the researchers or misinterpreted the task
This causes the research to lack validity.
Debi Roberson et al. found that the Berinmo people of New Guinea had difficulty recalling
and distinguishing between a variety of colours as they only have five words for different
colours in their own language.
This is evidence for the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis as it suggested that specific cognitive
processes are influenced by language.
Success criteria :-
Activity – 5 min
Aim: To describe the dances performed by honey bees to explain how they communicate
information to each other.
Method: In a controlled observation, Von Frisch put a food source close to the hive
(within about 10–20 metres), as well as one further away (up to 300 metres).
He made over 6000 observations of honey bees over 20 years.
Results: Worker bees tell the others where pollen is located by two types of dance:
Round dance: Moving in a circle sometimes changing direction to indicate food is less
than 100 metres away. Audience bee workers fly close to the hive to find the food source
60% of bees went to food sources at the distance indicated by the dances.
Scientific value
A strength is that Von Frisch’s work made an important contribution to science. It was a careful study of 20 years
with objective recording. People knew that bees danced but had no understanding of the meaning of the
movements. This shows how valuable his research was.
Success criteria :-
• Survival
• Reproduction
• Territory
• Food
Survival:
Vervet monkeys use sounds to warn of danger (alarm calls). A specific sound warns other
monkeys close by. Rabbits use visual signals. They lift their tail high, pin ears back and
leap forward to communicate danger to other rabbits. These signals increase the survival
of members of the signaller’s species.
Reproduction:
Animals use mating displays. Peacocks stretch their feathers like an umbrella to attract
females. Mating displays communicate genetic fitness through brightly coloured and
plentiful feathers.
Food:
Animals use signals to show location of food.
Ants leave a pheromone trail to communicate the location of a food source or like in the
Von Frisch’s bee experiment.
Creativity:
Animal communication involves a closed system as the gestures, sounds and movements
only refer to very specific events. Human language is an open system as words can be
combined together in an infinite number of ways.
This means that human communication has endless potential, i.e. it is creative.
Want to know the latest?
Facebook GEMS Winchester School Dubai Official
Human and animal communication
Single vs multiple channels:
Human language can be expressed using a whole range of different channels such as
spoken, written or sign language and all of the different types of social media.
This is not a feature of animal communication which tends to use single channels such as
pheromones in ants
Non – verbal behavior – Exchanging information without words. This includes eye –
contact, body language, tone of voice and facial expressions
Success criteria :-
It is when two people look at each others eyes at the same time.
• Signaling attraction
Eye-contact tends to increase when you are up close or talking to somebody you like.
Conway et al. found that people who use eye contact are judged as more attractive.
Participants were shown pictures of males and females looking straight at them or looking
slightly away even with a negative facial expression like disgust. It was concluded that eye
– contact is an evolutionary behavior that signals attraction to a potential mate
People use eye-contact as a way of expressing intense emotions they are feeling
Adams and Kleck showed pictures of faces showing different emotions ie joy,
anger, fear and sadness. The eye were either of a direct gaze or that of an
averted gaze. They found that participants judged emotions of joy and anger as
more intense when shown a picture of someone gazing straight at them as
opposed to gazing away.
They judged emotions of fear and sadness as more intense when the gaze in the
picture was averted.
Artificial studies
Another weakness is that studies of eye contact involve quite artificial tasks.
In Kendon’s study, participants were asked to get to know someone as part of the experiment. This
means the results may lack validity as they do not reflect what would happen in everyday life. They
could have experienced pressure or embarrassment and hence affect eye-contact.
Non-Verbal communication
Learning Objective :-
Success criteria :-
Challenge:
• Use your Ipad to find researches that support or go
against studies conducted on body language.
McGinley et al. Participants were shown slides of a female discussing her views of
various topics. participants were asked their views before and after the presentation. It
was found that participants were more likely to change their opinions in line with a
female confederate’s if she had adopted an open posture when discussing her views, as
opposed to a closed posture.
People who are friends or getting on well in a conversation tend to copy each
other’s body position.
Tanner and Chartrand made participants give feedback about a new drink
‘Vigor’. With one group, researchers used postural echo and copied the gesture
and posture of the participants. There was no attempt for this in the other
group. They found that participants had more positive feelings towards a new
drink if the researcher had used postural echo during the interview, than if there
was no postural echo.
Fisher et al. Female students in a library were handed books by the librarian
(confederate). Half were lightly touched on the hand and the other was not.
They found that students handed books by a librarian who touched them on the
hand were more positive about the librarian than those who were not touched.
Ethical Issues
Another weakness is that research in this area raises ethical issues. For example, field experiments on
postural echo and touch involved a lack of informed consent and it is unclear whether participants
were debriefed afterwards.
This could affect the trust people have in psychologists.
Non-Verbal communication
Learning Objective :-
Success criteria :-
Culture Differences
Gender differences
Status differences
Challenge:
• Use your Ipad to find researches that support or go
against studies conducted on personal space.
Men prefer a larger social distance when interacting with men but women prefer
smaller social distance when talking to other women.
Bryne found that when talking to friends, men prefer to sit opposite one another
whilst women prefer to sit side by side.
Fisher and Byrne set up a study where a confederate would invade the personal
space of men and women in a library. This was done by either face to face or
from the side. They found that women felt more uncomfortable when a
confederate invaded their personal space from the side whereas with men it was
from the front.
Oversimplistic
A weakness is that research into personal space only looks at one factor at a time. In reality, several
factors may be affecting personal space distances at the same time such as culture, gender,
personality, age and status. This makes research in this area too simplistic.
Unrepresentative samples
Another weakness is studies may use unrepresentative samples. It is difficult to use a sample of
people in a personal space experiment that reflects all people within a culture, or all males and all
females.
This means we should be cautious in generalizing the results to everyone. Eg All men maintain a
larger distance from strangers
Explanations of Non-Verbal communication
Learning Objective :-
Success criteria :-
Thus characteristics and behaviours that promote survival and reproduction are
adaptive in nature as gives the individuals a genetic advantage
Challenge:
• Use your Ipad to find researches that support or go
against Darwins explanation
Eg 1 - Opening your eyes wide indicates surprise because it has evolved from
animal behaviour – animals under threat would open their eyes wide to see an
escape route to avoid danger.
This behaviour passed down to humans and continues to express surprise.
Servicable behaviours were those that were adaptive to our distant ancestors
(such as wrinkling the nose and baring teeth).
These behaviours continue to be in use to show how we feel but may not serve
the original adaptive purpose for survival.
Success criteria :-
Social releasers: John Bowlby suggested that babies are born with non-verbal behaviours like smiling
or giving eye-contact which make others want to look after babies.
This is adaptive because it means that a young baby will be looked after and the genes passed on
Facial expressions: Rosenstein and Oster found that young babies’ faces showed disgust with novel
foods like citric acid (found in lemons) ie their lips curled up and noses wrinkled.
This suggests such facial expressions as a way of communicating emotions are innate
If behaviours are different this suggests that they are learned rather than innate.
People from contact cultures (the Mediterranean and Latin America) are comfortable with
smaller personal space. They see people from non-contact cultures as rude
People from non-contact cultures (the UK and the US) maintain a larger distance between
themselves and others. They see people from contact cultures as over-bearing
Want to know the latest?
Facebook GEMS Winchester School Dubai Official
Explanations of Non-Verbal communication
Gestures
Roxie Black describes how pointing one’s index finger is acceptable in Western culture to
emphasise what is being said but offensive in Hindu culture where people tend to point
with their thumbs.
Social learning theory can explain cultural differences (observing and imitating others
especially from people you identify with).
People observe what other people in their culture are doing (e.g. personal space – greet,
touch etc) and copy those behaviours.
Success criteria :-
Aim:
Method:
Results:
Conclusion:
Challenge:
• Use your Ipad to find researches that support your
possible evaluation points
Aim
The Japanese gave higher ratings to faces with happy eyes than the Americans, even
when the mouth was sad. (emoticon 3)
Americans gave higher ratings when mouths were happy even when the eyes were sad.
(emoticon 6)
Conclusion
This suggests that cultural groups interpret facial expressions differently which may be
due to cultural norms and expectations.
Japanese people tend to focus on the eyes as they are taught to hide emotions and thus
focus on the eyes for cues where as Americans focus on the mouth as they express
emotions openly using both eyes and mouth
Want to know the latest?
Facebook GEMS Winchester School Dubai Official
Explanations of Non-Verbal communication
Evaluation
Artificial materials
A weakness is that emoticons may not represent human faces. Emoticons do not include those tell-tale
lines on people’s faces which give us further information of how to interpret their eyes and mouth. This
means the results of the study may lack relevance to everyday life.