NODAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS final final
NODAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS final final
19/12/2024 1
WHY NODAL ANALYSIS?
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 2
WHAT IS NODAL ANALYSIS?
The method for analyzing the well which will allow determination of
producing capacity of any combination of components.
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 3
NODAL ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS
•Selecting tubing size.
•Selecting Flowline size.
•Gravel pack design.
•Surface choke sizing.
•Analyzing an existing system for abnormal
flow restrictions (production impediments).
•Artificial lift system design.
•Well stimulation evaluation.
•Analyzing effects of perforating density.
•Predicting the effect of depletion on production
capacity.
•Allocating injection gas among gas lift wells.
•Analyzing a multiwell producing system.
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 4
PROCEDURE FOR NODAL ANALYSIS
Q Q
INFLOW NODE OUTFLOW
Pu UPSTREAM Pn DOWNSTREAM Pd
COMPONENTS COMPONENTS
ΔPu ΔPd
ΔP = f (Q)
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 5
SELECTION OF NODE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 6
PRESSURE Vs FLOW RATE PLOT
NODE PRESSURE
FLOW RATE, Q
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 7
ANALYSIS FOR WELLHEAD NODE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 8
EFFECT OF FLOWLINE SIZE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 10
EFFECT OF TUBING SIZE
19/12/2024 11
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford)
SELECTING OPTIMUM TUBING SIZE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 12
EFFECT OF STIMULATION AND MINIMIZING
THE FLOW RESTRICTIONS IN TUBING
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 13
GAS LIFT WELL PERFORMANCE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 14
EFFECT OF PERFORATING DENSITY ON INFLOW
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 15
EFFECT OF PERFORATING DENSITY ON FLOW RATE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 16
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
1. Determine which components in the system can be changed.
2. Select one component to be optimized.
3. Select the node location.
4. Develop expressions for Inflow and Outflow.
5. Obtain required data to calculate the pressure drop vs. flow rate fall components.
6. Determine the effect of changing the characteristics of the selected component
by plotting inflow vs. outflow and reading the intersection.
7. Repeat the procedure for each component that is to be optimized.
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 17
EXCERCISE
19/12/2024
(Source: Nodal analysis , Weatherford) 18
SOLUTION
Q ∆P1 ∆P2 (for 2 inch dia) ∆P (for 3 inch dia)
19/12/2024 19
GRAPHICAL SOLUTION
600
500
400
Pressure, P
300
Inflow
Outflow (for 2 Inch Dia)
200
Outflow (for 3 inch Dia)
100
0
000 500 000 500 000 500 000 500 000 500
2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
Flow Rate, Q
19/12/2024 20
CONCLUSIONS DRIVEN
• Change in pressure loss in upstream will not affect the outflow curve
(vice-versa)
• Change in constant pressures at either side, will shift the respective
curve location.
(a)
(b)
(Source: H. Dale Beggs ,Production optimization using NODAL analysis)
19/12/2024 23
EXAMPLE ILLUSTRATING THE EFFECT OF CHOKE
The following well is to be equipped with surface choke operating at critical flow. Determine well
operating conditions for following:
1. No choke
2. Choke at wellhead
3. Choke at separator
Well depth=7000 ft Flowline length=3000 ft
Tubing size=1.995 in. Flowline size=2 in.
Pr(avg)=2500 psia GLR=500 scf/STB
fw=0 Psep=120 psig
C=0.0023 STB/day*psia n=0.85
19/12/2024 26
GILBERT’S PLOT FOR THP DETERMINATION
560 2188
7000
19/12/2024 27
CRITICAL FLOW THROUGH CHOKE
Puptream = 2*Pdownstream
CHOKE AT WELLHEAD:
Pwh = 2*(Psep + DEL(Pflowline))
CHOKE AT SEPARATOR:
Pwh = (2*Psep) + DEL(Pflowline)
500
19/12/2024 30
TABLE FOR OUTFLOW
Q, STB/day NO choke (Pwf, psig) Wellhead (Pwf, psig) Separator (Pwf, psig)
19/12/2024 31
800
700
600
500 (730,340)
(595,435)
Pwh, psig
400 Inflow
No choke
Wellhead
300
Separator
200
(800,275)
100
0
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Q, STB/day
THANK YOU
19/12/2024 33