Project Presentation by Hilary
Project Presentation by Hilary
)
(Convolvulaceae)AND AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF Glyphaea brevis (Malvaceae) ON SELECTED CLINICAL
BACTERIAL ISOLATES
BY
SUBMITTED TO
To evaluate the antidiarrhoeal and antibacterial properties of the aqueous and ethanol
extracts of Glyphaea brevis and Ipomoea triloba.
To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal
concentration (MBC) of these extracts on selected bacterial isolates.
OBJECTIVES
To obtain the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum biocidal concentration (MBC) of the
aqueous leaves extract of Glyphaea brevis and Ipomoea triloba on the selected clinical diarrhoeal isolates
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Diarrhoea is characterized by the frequent passage of loose or watery stools, often accompanied by dehydration and
abdominal pain. Bacterial pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp. are responsible for the
majority of cases, particularly in regions with poor sanitation (Troeger et al., 2021). These pathogens can lead to severe
dehydration and, if left untreated, may result in death, especially among children and the elderly. Furthermore, the rise
of antibiotic-resistant strains has complicated treatment, necessitating the search for alternative remedies (Ventola,
2015).
Glyphaea brevis, a member of the Malvaceae family, is known for its traditional use in treating diarrhoea
and related gastrointestinal issues. Studies have shown that the plant contains flavonoids, tannins, and
alkaloids, which possess antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties (Bawa et al., 2020). These
bioactive compounds inhibit bacterial growth, reduce intestinal inflammation, and alleviate diarrhoeal
symptoms. Previous research has demonstrated the plant's efficacy against pathogens such as E. coli and
Salmonella spp., supporting its traditional use as a diarrhoeal remedy (Ojo et al., 2022).
the Agar ditch method was employed to establish the MIC. The culture medium used was Mueller Hinton Agar,
prepared according to the manufacturer’s guidelines , resulting in a concentration of 42 mg/ml. To prepare
various concentrations of the Ipomoea triloba extract, serial dilutions were conducted in water: 5 g in 10 mL, 4 g
in 10 mL, 3 g in 10 mL, 2 g in 10 mL, 1 g in 10 mL, 0.5 g in 10 mL, and 0.25 g in 10 mL. Similarly,
concentrations of the Glyphaea brevis extract were prepared using the same dilution scheme: 4 g in 10 mL, 3 g in
10 mL, 2 g in 10 mL, 1 g in 10 mL, 0.5 g in 10 mL, and 0.25 g in 10 ml. After preparing the dilutions, 1 mL of
the 5 g/10 mL Ipomoea triloba extract was mixed with 1 mL of each diluted concentration of the Glyphaea
brevis extract in individual sample bottles. This mixing procedure was repeated for all remaining diluted
concentrations of Ipomoea triloba
RESULTS
Ethanol Extracts: Ethanol extracts demonstrated higher antibacterial efficacy compared
to aqueous extracts, particularly against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus spp., where
inhibition was observed at higher concentrations (600 mg/ml and 800 mg/ml). The
ethanol extracts were more effective due to their ability to dissolve a wider range of
bioactive compounds such as alkaloids and flavonoids, which have known antimicrobial
properties.
Aqueous Extracts: The aqueous extracts showed moderate antibacterial activity but
were less effective compared to ethanol extracts. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhii, and
Staphylococcus aureus displayed resistance to the aqueous extracts, with minimal
inhibition observed even at the highest concentrations (800 mg/ml).
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): The lowest concentrations at which microbial
growth was inhibited varied across bacterial species, with ethanol extracts generally
showing better results. For Proteus spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae, growth was
inhibited at 600 mg/ml and above.
DISCUSSION
The study revealed that the ethanol extracts of Ipomoea triloba and Glyphaea brevis were more effective
than the aqueous extracts in inhibiting the growth of several bacterial strains. Notably, Klebsiella
pneumoniae and Proteus spp. were highly susceptible to the ethanol extracts at higher concentrations, with
complete inhibition observed at 600 mg/ml and 800 mg/ml. Conversely, aqueous extracts demonstrated
weaker antibacterial activity across all tested bacterial strains, particularly Escherichia coli and Salmonella
typhi, which exhibited no significant inhibition. The observed differences in efficacy between the extracts
suggest that ethanol is a more suitable solvent for extracting bioactive compounds such as alkaloids and
flavonoids, which are known for their antimicrobial properties. These results align with existing literature
that supports the use of ethanol extracts for isolating more potent phytochemicals compared to aqueous
methods
CONCLUSION
The findings from this study confirm that Glyphaea brevis and Ipomoea triloba possess
antidiarrhoeal properties, particularly through their antibacterial activity against common diarrhoeal
pathogens. The effectiveness of the plant extracts, especially at higher concentrations, supports their
traditional use in treating diarrhoea and other gastrointestinal disorders. The Ethanol extracts
demonstrated greater efficacy than the aqueous extracts, suggesting that the bioactive compounds in
these plants are more effectively extracted by Ethanol. Given the rising challenge of antibiotic
resistance, these plants hold promise as alternative therapeutic agents for treating bacterial
infections, especially in resource-limited settings.
RECOMMENDATION
Further Isolation of Active Compounds: Future research should aim to isolate and identify the
specific bioactive compounds responsible for the observed antibacterial effects in both plants. This
will help develop standardized plant-based treatments.
In Vivo Studies: In vivo experiments are essential to determine the safety, efficacy, and appropriate
dosage of these plant extracts in animal models, and eventually in clinical trials with humans.
Synergistic Studies: Investigating the synergistic effects of combining these plant extracts with
conventional antibiotics could enhance the efficacy of current treatments, especially in tackling
antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains.
Broader Spectrum Testing: Further studies should evaluate the extracts against a wider range of
bacterial species, including those responsible for diarrhoea in different geographical regions, to
confirm the general applicability of the results.
REFERENCES
Ali, A., Khan, A., Ali, and Khan, S. (2020). Medicinal plants with antidiarrheal properties: A review on scientific
and traditional perspective. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, 129, 110389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110389
Bawa, D., Dan, G., Bala, S., and Mangoro, A. (2020). Phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of aqueous
and aqueousic extracts of Glyphaea brevis leaves. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies, 8(2), 23-29.
Ojo, A. A., Ibrahim, A. B., and Okeke, P. C. (2022). Phytochemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of
aqueous extract of Glyphaea brevis against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical
Research, 18(3), 45-52.
Okeke, I. N., Lamikanra, A., and Edelman, R. (2022). Combating enteric bacterial pathogens in developing
countries: The role of plant-based remedies. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 16(1), 8-17.
Omotayo, O. P., Owolabi, J. O., Oloyede, O. I., and Oladipo, O. O. (2021). Antimicrobial activity of plant
extracts on diarrhoeal pathogens: A review of scientific evidence. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 280,
114267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114267