0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views

12. Drug Design and Structure-Property Relationship

Uploaded by

lilyhaileab9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views

12. Drug Design and Structure-Property Relationship

Uploaded by

lilyhaileab9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Balancing Potency and Physicochemical Properties

 Potency is primarily driven by hydrophobic interactions (lipophilic components of the drug


interacting with hydrophobic pockets on the target). Hydrophilic interactions (primarily H-
bonding interactions) facilitate shape complementarity.

Phe 169 Met 109


pocket Asp N
Thr H
168
106 ATP
N Binding interactions
NH site
between p38 kinase
OH
O O H and a potent inhibitor
O N
S S
N N O
H O H
O O
kinase
Glu71 specificity pocket

 Chemists often improve potency by adding additional lipophilic groups to the molecule.
However increased lipophilicity increases the chance of poor metabolic stability, off target
effects, and decreased aqueous solubility.

 Past complaint: Chemists initially concentrate on improving potency and then later pay
attention to improving other properties (PK, safety, physicochemical properties).

 Current practice: Chemists pay attention to improving potency and physicochemical


properties simultaneously from the beginning (a balancing game).
Rule of 5 and the Rule of 3

Ro5 ('Drug-like')* Ro3 ('Lead-like')**

MW ≤ 500 ≤ 300

# H-bond donors ≤5 ≤3

# H-bond acceptors ≤ 10 ≤3

clogP ≤5 ≤3

* Good absorption or permeation are more likely when......(see Lipinski, C.A.; et al.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2001, 46, 3-26)
** Congreve, M.; et. al. Drug Disc. Today 2003, 8, 876-877.
biw80ab
Biopharmaceutical Barriers to Drug Action
Properties affecting oral bioavailability and intestinal absorption via passive diffusion

Property Rule of 51 Averages for marketed oral drugs2


Aqueous solubility
≤ 5 (ClogP) 2.5 (ACD logP)
Lipid solubility
# H-bond donors ≤5 2.1
# H-bond acceptors ≤ 10 4.9
Molecular weight ≤ 500 337
Drug ionization 1.0 (ACD logD7.4)
Rotatable bonds 5.9
Metabolic stability

1
Rof5 defines 4 simple physicochemical parameter ranges associated with 90% of orally active drugs that have
achieved phase II clinical status. See: Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. "Experimental and
Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings."
Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.
2
Wenlock, M. C.; Austin, R. P.; Barton, P. Davis, A. M.; Lesson, P. D. "A Comparison of Physicochemical Property
Profiles of Development and Marketed Oral Drugs." J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1250-1256.
sc88
Drug Lipophilicity

 Drug lipophilicity affects multiple parameters and must be


carefully managed.

 Parameters affected by drug lipophilicity include:

 Aqueous solubility

 Permeability

 Metabolic stability

 Volume of distribution/tissue binding and clearance

 Toxicity
Balancing SAR and SPR

 Medicinal chemists must carefully balance structure-activity relationships (SAR)


with structure-property relationships (SPR) when optimizing analogues
throughout the drug discovery process.

 SAR – changes made to a compound scaffold that affects the binding


affinity and potency (biological activity) of the compound.

 SPR – changes made to a compound scaffold that affects the


physicochemical properties of the compound. These changes can effect
ADME properties:

 Absorption

 Distribution

 Metabolism

 Exrcetion (Elimination)
Pharmacophore and Auxophore

 The structural elements of a compound (atoms and functional groups) not directly
involved in binding/activity.

 Role of the auxophore may include serving as a scaffold to hold pharmacophoric


groups in a specific 3D orientation, contribute to specific physiochemical properties
that affect PK or simply occupy space.

 Changes to the auxophore generally do not affect pharmacodynamics but may affect
pharmacokinetics.

 The auxophore can potentially be used as a handle to modulate physicochemical


properties.
Improving Solubility: Add Polar Auxophore Groups
Kinase Inhibitors - Using a "Handle" to Modify Physicochemical Properties

N
H H
Br NH N N N NCH3
OCH3
N N O

N OCH3

N
PD 153035 (1994) Gleevec®

Poorly soluble Improved solubility, %F

F
t-Bu O
O N
Cl NH O N O
N N N
O N H H
N

N OCH3

CH3
Iressa® BIRB 796
Improved solubility, %F Improved solubility, %F
ACE Inhibitors - Using a "Handle" to Modify Physicochemical Properties

Ph NH2 Ph

CH3 (CH2)4 CH3


SH N HO N EtO N
N N
CO2H H H
O O O CO2H O O CO2H

Captopril (po BA = 65% Lisinopril (25% - AT) Enalapril (41% - PD or AT?)


via Active Transport) Similar IC50's with and w/o benzo fusion

Ph Ph Ph
H
H
CH3 CH3
N EtO N O
EtO N N
N
H H CH3 P
O CO2H O O CO2H
O O O CO2H
H3C
Quinapril (38%) Trandolapril (75%) OCOCH2CH3

Fosinopril (36%)
~
Improving Solubility: Lower LogP
Rationale:

 Adding polar groups increases polarity and decreases hydrophobic character.


 Decreased LogP can help improve solubility.
 Basic amines and carboxylic acids can be converted into salts.

N N
Cl
N S N
OH N
Cl N
N O N N
N N N

H Cl S NN OH NF
N
C
C O
F
Cl
Cl F
tPSA: 24.83 tPSA: 76.15
CLogP: 5.32753 CLogP: -0.44
F
Cl
Fluconazole
Tioconazole
Antifungal agent with poor Systemic antifungal agent
solubility - skin infections only improved blood solubility
Improving Permeability: Reduce tPSA
Discovery ADME - Prediction of Intestinal Absorption of ETA Antagonists

OCH3

O
O R
CO2H

O
O

ETA permeability (cm/s)


R K i (nM) Ro5 PSAd Caco-2 F (%) - rat

CO2H (SB 209670) 0.43 - 126.8 2.1 x 10-6 4

CH2OH (SB 217242*) 1.1 - 103.8 57 x 10-6 66

*SB 217242 clinical trials for CHF

Stenberg, P. et al, Pharm. Res. 1999, 16, 1520-1526 sc91o


Improving Permeability: Vary pKa

Rationale:

 Varying pKa alters percentage of drug which is ionized


 Alter pKa to obtain required ratio of ionised to unionized drug

Method:

 Vary alkyl substituents on amine nitrogens.


 Vary aryl substituents to influence aromatic amines or aromatic carboxylic acids.
Improving Permeability: Vary pKa

N N

O N O N
N N
N N
H H
O vs O

H2N NH N NH2

amidine amino pyridine

Antithrombotic Decreased basicity


but too basic N locked into heterocycle
Improving Metabolic Stability: Blocking Groups

Rationale:

 Used to increase chemical and metabolic stability


 Introduce bulky group as a shield
 Protects a susceptible functional group (e.g. ester) from hydrolysis
 Hinders attack by nucleophiles or enzymes

O O
H
HS N
N N
H H
O  tert-Butyl group serves as a steric shield.
 Blocks hydrolysis of terminal amide.
O N O

Antirheumatic agent D1927


Improving Metabolic Stability: Blocking Groups
Rationale:

 Metabolism of drugs usually occur at specific sites. Introduce groups at


a susceptible site to block the reaction.
 Increases metabolic stability and drug lifetime.

O O
O O
H O H O
H H H H
O O
CH3 metabolism blocked at this site
metabolism at this site

Megesterol acetate
Improving Metabolic Stability: Blocking Groups
Rationale:

 Metabolism of drugs usually occur at specific sites. Introduce fluorine atoms at


a susceptible site to block the reaction.
 Increases metabolic stability and drug lifetime.
 The carbon-fluorine bond is very strong and not susceptible to CYP-mediated
oxidation.

F F
F F
H H
N N
N N
O O
N O F N O F
S S
O O
2 3
GlyT-1 IC50 = 23.2 nM GlyT-1 IC50 = 67.5 nM
GlyT-2 IC50 >75 M GlyT-2 IC50 >75 M
HLM* = 16% remaining @ 60 min HLM = 64% remaining @ 60 min
Lead Optimization - Benefits of Fluorine
Why do many new small molecule drugs contain one or more F's?

- Increased chemical and metabolic stability (defer to later discussions)


• C-F bond is one of the strongest known
• Adjacent C-C bonds are also strengthened

- F substitution can modulate physicochemical properties; H → F leads to:


• Higher lipophilicity (generally)
• Decrease pKa of basic centers [CH3CH2NH2 (10.7) → CF3CH2NH2 (5.7)]
• Increase in van der Waals volume not proportional to MW
- CH3 (MW = 15; VW = 21.6 Å3) → CF3 (MW = 69; VW = 39.8 Å3)

- Fluorine's contribution to protein-ligand interactions:


• HBA: C-F···H-O and C-F···H-N interactions
frequently observed in crystal structures
• Dipole interactions are numerous (e.g., C-F···C=O)

- Efficient synthetic methods (e.g., DAST)

Purser, S.; et al. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320.


Müller, K.; et al, Science 2007, 317, 1881.
Incorporating Drug Metabolism Early in the Discovery Process
Strategies to Overcome Metabolism Problems
• Avoid metabolic "hotspots" (e.g., esters)
• Modify physicochemical properties
- Decrease logP to retard extraction into the liver
• Once metabolite profile is known, modify the molecule to retard metabolism
- Beware of metabolic switching!

Cl
P450
X X X X
H HO F HO
Cl
Retards Phase II
glucuronidation

de Groot, M. J. "Designing better drugs: predicting cytochrome P450 metabolism." Drug Disc. Today 2006, 11, 601.
Henderson, A.; Guzzo, P. "Metabolism-driven optimization of pharmacokinetics." Curr. Drug Disc. 2004, May, 17.
Strategies to Overcome Metabolic Inactivation
SO2NHC(=O)NH(CH2)3CH3 SO2NHC(=O)NH(CH2)2CH3

CH3 Cl
Tolbutamide Chlorpropamide

O O

OCH2CH2NEt2 NHCH2CH2NEt2

NH2 NH2
Procaine Procainamide

O O
OH
OH
O O
H3C H H CH3 H
O H3C O

O O

Lovastatin (MevacorTM) Simvastatin (ZocorTM)

X X X X
H OH O OH
Nuc

RNH RNH RN RNH Nuc

P450 hydroxylation of arylamines can be retarded by X = EWG


Metabolism-Directed Optimization of Merck Thrombin Inhibitors
Burgey, C. S. et al, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 461-473.

CH3 Oxid.
N O
N Conjugation
N N
H H
O
Oxid. H3C N NH2
K i = 0.8 nM
• di-F and 2-pyr   in K i • Remove NH2  350-fold  in K i
• 2-pyr   logP and  sol. • Of unsubt. analogues, 2-pyr best

CH3 CH3
N O N O
N N N
N N N N N
H H H H
F F O O
N NH2 K i = 390 nM
K i = 0.042 nM

Additive SAR observed CH3


 Potency by adding L.H. piece
N O
N N
N N N
H H
F F O
K i = 15 nM

3-F   metabolic stability (N to N O; CH2 to CHOH)


CH3
N O
K i = 4.2 nM
N N
t1/2 = 3.5 h N N N
H H
F F O
F
Strategies to Enhance Metabolism

F3C N F3C N
N SO2NH2 N SO2NH2

Cl CH3

IC50 vs. COX-2 = 10 nM IC50 vs. COX-2 = 40 nM


t1/2 (rat) = 117 h t1/2 (rat) = 3.5 h

Penning, T. D. et al, J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1347.

You might also like