Perspective in Management
Perspective in Management
Perspectives in
Management
Introduction
The origin of management can be traced back to the days when man started living in groups.
Management was developed along with the development of civilization. Once the people
started to live in family, society, they started developing management process knowingly or
unknowingly. Joint family can be taken as good example of management since early era. As
per the human development, such traditional practice of management has also changed.
Today, management has several principles. Many scholars has contributed to develop
different management techniques. In general, we can classify different perspective into:
Classical theory, human relations and behavior science perspective, decision science
perspective, management science perspective, system theory and contingency perspectives
which shall be studied further.
Classical perspective in management
The classical theory signifies the beginning of the systematic study of management
organization. It is often called the traditional theory. It can be traced historically to the 19th
century prototype industrial and military organizations. The classical theory incorporates
three viewpoints: (1) Taylor’s Scientific Management (2) Fayol’s Administrative Management;
and (3) Weber’s Ideal Bureaucracy (an organization based on rules and regulations, formal
relations, specialization, etc.).
Salient features of classical approach are as follows:
• Division of labour and specialization, structure, scalar and functional processes and span of
control.
• Emphasis organization structure for co-ordination of various activities.
• Ignored the impact of external environment. It treats organizations as closed systems.
• Centralization of authority.
• Interests of the organisation should prevail if there is conflict between individual and
organization.
• People at work could be motivated by the economic rewards which can be called rational
economic person
A. Scientific Management theory
The impetus for the scientific management approach came from the first industrial revolution.
Because it brought about such an extraordinary mechanization of industry, this revolution
necessitated the development of new management principles and practices. The main
contributors to scientific management were Frederick W. Taylor, Henry L. Gantt, Frank Gilbreth,
Lillian Gilbreth and Harrington Emerson.
F.W. Taylor (1865-1915) was the first person who insisted on the introduction of scientific
methods in management. He launched a new movement during the last decade of 19th
century which is known as ‘Scientific Management’. That is why, Taylor is regarded as the
father of scientific management. Taylor was an American engineer who responded to the
challenges of management around the turn of the century. During that period, productivity
was very low, labour became extremely dissatisfied and industries had to face frequent strikes
and lockouts. Taylor’s contribution was a system based on science whereby lower labour cost
could be achieved simultaneously with higher wages. He suggested the change in the mental
attitudes of the workers and the management to bring harmony in the industry.
Scientific management means application of scientific methods to the problems of
management. Taylor advocated scientific task setting based on time and motion study,
standardization of materials, tools and working conditions, scientific selection and training of
workers and so on. It is to be noted that Taylor’s thinking was confined to management at the
shop level. However, he demonstrated the possibility and significance of the scientific analysis
of the various aspects of management. To sum up, he laid emphasis on following principles:-
• Science, not rule of thumb.
• Harmony in group action, rather than discord.
• Maximum output in place of restricted output.
• Scientific selection, training and placement of the workers.
• Almost equal division of work and responsibility between workers and managers.
The basic idea behind the principles of scientific management is to change the mental
attitudes of the workers and the management towards each other. Taylor called it ‘Mental
Revolution’ which has three implications:
• all out efforts for increase in production;
• creation of the spirit of mutual trust and confidence; and
• inculcating and developing the scientific attitude towards problems.
• Limitations
Suggest situational decision making but does not recommend any probable solutions
Managers may sometime mislead in search of situation of specific problems
Emerging Management Concepts
Business environment now a days is more complex and challenging. Globalization, open
market economy, frequent changes in political legal environment, technological inventions and
development, technology transfer, FDI etc. are some causes which make business environment
more unpredictable and complex. In order to overcome those issues, new management
concept is being emerged, some of them are:-
1. Workforce diversity
Without human resources, it is difficult to attain organizational goals. From planning to
implementations of plans and output evaluation, human resources are very important. But, it
is very difficult task to hire and place right man at right place. In modern organizations, there
are different types of human resources in terms of age, gender, caste, race, economic status,
social status, geographical location. They might have separate goals (individual goals).
Management for such human resource is difficult. If human resource is managed properly,
organization can enjoy benefit, which are:-
• Varieties of perspective
• Increased creativity
• Increased productivity
• Improved performance
• Branch reputation
• Better decision making
• Higher employee engagement and reduced turnover.
• Improved hiring results.
Limitations
• Poor focus on leadership qualities
• Chances of conflict
• Decrease in mutual cost
• Creating communication problems
• Increase in complaints
• Difficult to apply.
2. Knowledge Management
Knowledge management is the process of collecting, organising, classifying and disseminating
information throughout an organization, making it purposeful to needy people. Generally,
there can be two types of knowledge as tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge. Tacit
knowledge is related with personal experience, skill, understanding and knowledge gained by
personal study and working experience in various level. Whereas, explicit knowledge can be
obtained in written forms such as working mannuals, guidelines, legal circulars, booklets etc. if
any organization has proper knowledge management process, they can be implied in
organization for better results. Derivation of knowledge comprise of:-
Data
Information
Knowledge
wisdom
4. Learning Organization
This concept explains as the organization should be converted into learning center to create new
knowledge and methods to solve different problems. Only the knowledge is the way to lead today’s
competitive market. So, it is most important to give emphasis on learning different techniques to
become more competitive. Knowledge is not bounded with any age, gender and level of organization.
So, managers need to create free learning environmnet to its employees within the organization to
make them globally competent.
• Features of learning organization
System thinking
Personal mastery
Mental models
Shared vision
Team learning