Marxism
Marxism
This process is not linear but cyclical and dynamic, continuously repeating at progressively higher levels of complexity.
Example:
Thesis: Feudalism (a hierarchical socio-economic system).
Antithesis: Bourgeois revolution (challenging the feudal order).
Synthesis: Capitalism (a new system combining elements of both while superseding them).
Contradictions in this system are always a part of the system and they become a Motor of Change:
For Hegel, contradictions are inherent in all things and drive development. A concept or condition contains within itself the seeds of
its opposite, which eventually emerge and lead to transformation.
Rather than avoiding or resolving contradictions in a simplistic way, Hegel sees their interplay as essential to progress.
Hegelian Dialectics
Dialectics captures this relational nature by showing how each part of a system reflects and
influences the whole.
Hegel views history as the unfolding of the "World Spirit" (Geist) through dialectical stages. This
process represents the self-realisation of human freedom and reason.
Each stage of history reflects a particular synthesis of contradictions from previous stages. History
progresses toward greater freedom, reason, and self-awareness.
Sublation (Aufhebung):
A key feature of dialectics is sublation, where contradictions are not simply negated but preserved
and elevated into a higher unity.
The synthesis "overcomes" the conflict while retaining essential elements of both thesis and
antithesis.
•Ludwig Feuerbach (1804–1872) German philosopher and
anthropologist — atheism.
Eisenstein, Sergei. October: Ten Days That Shook the World. 1928. Soviet Union: Goskino.
Boris Kustodiev,
The Bolshevik
(1920)
Pavel Filonov,
1914–1915.
ak Brodsky, Lenin at the Smolny (1930)
The Problematic Legacy of the Russian
Revolution
issitzky, Beat the Whites with the Red Wedge, 1920.
Aleksandr Deyneka,
he Textile Workers,
1927.
avel Filonov
ormula of the Petrograd
roletariat
1920-1921)
Alexander Deyneka,
The Defense of
Petrograd, 1928.
As Briony Fer writes, “The line becomes a site of tension
and negotiation, a boundary and a bridge. In
Constructivist art, it is not merely a compositional device
but a fundamental means of articulating the new spatial
and social order envisioned by revolutionary ideals.” (The
Language of Construction).
Lyubov Popova,
Constructivist Composition.
1921.
Lyubov Popova,
Spatial Force Construction.
1921.
Marxist Ideals in the Constructivist Aesthetics
The emphasis on lines in Constructivist art ties directly to Marxist
ideology in several ways:
Rejection of Individualism: Lines are not used to express individual
expression but to articulate collective aspirations, reflecting the Marxist
critique of bourgeois individualism.
Capitalist (Bourgeois): Owns the means of production (e.g. the factories, land or institutions)
Worker (Proletarian): Owns only their body and its ability to labour
Demuth, Charles. My Egypt. 1927
The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie
over the entire surface of the globe. It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere,
establish connections everywhere. The bourgeoisie has, through its exploitation of
the world market, given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in
every country. To the great chagrin of reactionaries, it has drawn from under the
feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national
industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by
new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all
civilized nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but
raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are
consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old
wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for
their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local
and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction,
universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual
production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common
property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more
impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a
world literature.
From the Communist Manifesto,
Bridgman, Frederick Arthur. Towing on the Nile. 18