Strategic Management
Strategic Management
- 2024
By: Dr Mohamed Khaled
Assistant Professor, The Chartered Institute of Marketing -
UK
And Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime
Transport
My Contacts
• LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mohamed-khaled-05038920
/
• Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Mohamed.Mkhaled.4
• Email: [email protected]
The key question here has to do with how quickly competitors will launch a
• Growth stage
The growth stage is characterized by a rapid increase in sales as
the product starts to attract different types of customers and
repeat purchases may start. Critically, it is at this stage that
competitors assess the product’s market and profit potential and
decide on their competitive moves. They may decide to modify or
improve their current offerings or enter the market with their own
new products (e.g. Microsoft Zunes as the ‘iPod killer’). If not, they
may use the other elements of the mix to detract attention from
the product, i.e. an advertising campaign or a price promotion. It is
possible that defensive attacks may be required to prevent the
curve from flattening.
PLC
• Maturity stage
At this stage the rate of growth slows down significantly. This stage
tends to last longer than the previous ones and is, probably, the most
challenging one: it is a fact of life for most marketers that the markets
they have to deal with are mature! This is a stage of severe
competition, market fragmentation and declining profits, due to over-
capacity in the industry. Indeed, competitors will try to uncover
untapped niches and/or enter price wars. This leads to a clear-out and
the weaker competitors will exit, possibly becoming suppliers to the
stronger ones or being bought by them (as we are currently seeing in
the car industry). The survivors will be either companies supplying the
bulk of the market, competing on a high volume–low margin basis, or
market nichers. Many firms will try to buck the trend and revamp their
PLCs or expand the market by creating a new segment, and hence
extra demand overall.
PLC
• Decline stage
This stage is marked by a slow or rapid decline of the sales of the
product. Decline may be due to better solutions (e.g. new
technology such as the USB flashdrive replacing floppy and zip
disks) supplanting weaker ones, a change in consumer tastes or an
increase in competition, be it domestic or international.
Customer Base
The Seven Markets Model “stakeholder
analysis”
Brand Values
• Generic Values: …… The qualities that are typical and
expected of every brand in your sector ……
• Shadow Values: …… The awkward truths that are
obvious to outsiders but not to insiders …………
positive/-ve
• Progressive Values: …… The qualities that you don’t
have but will need to achieve your vision……
• Defining Values: …… The qualities you would fight to
protect and distinguish your brand………
•External analysis
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
A. Political:
1. Taxation Policy.
2. Government policy.
3. Pressure groups.
4. Wars.
5. Terrorists attacks.
6. Revolutions.
7. Stability of political regime.
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
B. Economics:
1. Interest rate.
2. Inflation rate.
3. Unemployment rate.
4. GDP
5. Booms and recessions.
6. Energy available and cost.
7. Income.
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
C. Socio-Cultural:
1. Demographics.
2. Distribution of income.
3. Lifestyle: healthy – ecommerce – time poor, money rich –
showrooming - webrooming
4. Education.
5. Consumer trends.
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
D. Technological:
1. New discoveries and innovations.
2. Speed of technology transfer.
3. Rates of obsolescence.
4. Internet.
5. Information technology.
6. Internet.
7. Communications.
8. Pharmaceutical.
9. Electronics.
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
D. Technological:
Products
Improvement in current products
Products outdated or obsolete (e.g. camera films)
Change in usage pattern (documents transfer & courier companies)
Processes
EPOS
Internet based supply chain
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
E. Ecological/Environmental:
1. Environmental regulations.
2. Environmental protection legislations.
3. Business ethics.
4. Green industries
Put it all together: PESTEL Analysis
F. Legal:
1. Employment laws.
2. Industry laws.
3. Competition law.
4. Consumer protection law.
5. Contract law.
6. Patency.
7. Anti-dumping law.
8. Advertisement law.
Macro- PESTELE
Macro- PESTELE “External analysis”
1.2 Analysing the External Environment
“Micro-Environment”
1. Micro-Environment is closer to the organization than the macro-
environment so managers can have more influence over it
through competitive and collaborative moves.
• Availability of substitutes.
• Switching costs.
• Number of suppliers and few substitutes.
• Backward integration can gain control or ownership of suppliers.
• Definition
• The Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) is a tool that compares the firm and its rivals
and reveals their relative strengths and weaknesses.
What is the Competitive Profile Matrix
• Firms often use CPM to better understand the external environment and the
competition in a particular industry. The matrix identifies a firm’s key competitors and
compares them using industry’s critical success factors.
• The analysis also reveals company’s relative strengths and weaknesses against its
competitors, so a company would know, which areas it should improve and, which
areas to protect.
Critical Success Factors
• Critical success factors (CSF) are the key areas that must be performed at the highest
possible level of excellence if organizations want succeed in a particular industry. They
vary between different industries or even strategic groups and include both internal
and external factors.
Weight
• Each critical success factor should be assigned a weight ranging from 0.0 (low
importance) to 1.0 (high importance). The number indicates how important the factor is
in succeeding in the industry. If there were no weights assigned, all factors would be
equally important, which is an impossible scenario in the real world.
• The sum of all the weights must equal 1.0. Separate factors should not be given too
much emphasis (assigning a weight of 0.3 or more) because success in an industry is
rarely determined by one or few factors. In our first example, the most significant
factors are ‘strong online presence’ (0.15), ‘market share’ (0.14), ‘brand reputation’
(0.13).
Rating
• Rating
• The ratings in CPM refer to how well companies are doing in each area. They range
from 4 to 1, where 4 means a major strength, 3 – minor strength, 2 – minor weakness
and 1 – major weakness. Ratings, as well as weights, are assigned subjectively to each
company, but the process can be done easier through benchmarking.
• Benchmarking reveals how well companies are doing compared to each other or
industry’s average. Just remember that firms can be assigned equal ratings for the
same factor. For example, if Company A, Company B and Company C, have market
share of 25%, 27% & 28% accordingly, they would all receive the rating of 4 rather
than receiving ratings 2, 3 & 4.
• Score & Total Score
• The score is the result of weight multiplied by the rating. Each company receives a
score on each factor. The total score is simply the sum of all individual scores for the
company. The firm that receives the highest total score is relatively stronger than its
competitors. In our example, the strongest performer in the market should be Company
B (2.94 points).
Benefits of the CPM:
The same factors are used to compare the firms. This makes the comparison more
accurate.
The analysis displays the information on a matrix, which makes it easy to compare the
companies visually.
The results of the matrix facilitate decision-making. Companies can easily decide
which areas they should strengthen and protect or what strategies they should pursue.
Using the tool
To make it easier, use our list of CSFs and include as many factors as possible. In
addition, following questions should be helpful identifying industry’s CSF:
• The best way to identify what weights should be assigned to each factor is to compare
the best and worst-performing companies in the industry. Well-performing companies
will usually undertake activities that are significant for success in the industry.
• They will put most of their resources and energy into those activities compared to low-
performing organizations. Weights can also be determined in discussions with other
top-level managers.
Ratings should be assigned using benchmarking or during team discussions.
• Step 3. Compare the scores and take action
• You should compare the scores on each factor to identify where the company’s relative
strengths and weaknesses. In our first example, Company A had relative strength in
‘level of product integration’, ‘product range’ and ‘variety of distribution channels’.
Therefore, Company A should protect these areas while trying to improve its
weaknesses in ‘sales per employee’ and ‘market share’.
The company should also improve its strategy to become more successful in the
industry.
Issue Priority Matrix
EFAS Matrix (External Strategic Factors Analysis Summary)
• Weight: assign a weight to each factor from 1.0 (Most Important)
to 0.0 (Not Important) based on that factor’s probable impact on
a particular company’s current strategic position. The higher the
weight, the more important this factor is to the current and future
success of the company. (All weights must sum to 1.00 regardless
of the number of factors.)
• Rating Scale: assign a rating to each factor from 4
(Outstanding) to 1 (Poor) based on the company’s current
response to that particular factor. Each rating is a judgment
regarding how well the company is currently dealing with each
external factor.
• Weighted Score: multiply the weight in Column 2 for each
factor times its rating in Column 3 to obtain that factor’s
weighted score.
• Let's start this paper by evaluating Apple’s opportunities and
threats. First, I will start with opportunities. Opportunities are
elements in the environment that the business or project could
exploit to its advantage (Hunger & Wheelen, 2011).
Internal analysis
Thompson framework to identify
resources
• Tangible resources
• Style speaks to the example and approach that management takes in leading
the company, as well as how this influences performance, productivity, and
corporate culture.
Lewin and white leadership styles
• Autocratic/Authoritarian leaders: these leaders use
their authority to impose the ways of working and often
make decisions without consulting their team or
followers. This can work in organizations where input
from followers needs to be minimal and where their
motivation to ‘follow’ is not affected by not being
involved in the decision.
• Limited input from stakeholders.
• Highly structured environment.
• Clearly defined rules and processes.
• Participative or democratic leaders: these leaders
usually involve their followers in the decision-making
process. They tend to encourage participation from the
team and also delegate authority to team members.
This style of leadership is important when team
agreement matters.
• Delegative or free rein (laissez-faire) leaders:
these leaders give followers full freedom to make most
decisions and to perform work in the manner that is
most convenient for them. This type of leadership works
when the team is highly motivated and capable.
Bass and avolio leadership styles
• Transactional: where a leader influences others by what
they offer in exchange, the transaction.
This element represents the talent pool required, the size of the
existing workforce, and their motivations. It also considers how
they are trained and rewarded within the organization.
refers to the personnel of the company, how large the workforce is, where their
motivations reside, as well as how they are trained and prepared to accomplish
the tasks set before them.
7- Skills
•
A value chain is the series of steps or actions that a business enacts to create a
product and deliver it to a customer. Taken from start to finish, it is the series of
systems that the business uses to make money. The idea of a value chain was
first described by Michael Porter, an academic in the fields of business
management and economics, in his 1985 book "Competitive Advantage:
Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance."
COMPONENTS OF A VALUE CHAIN