ch08
ch08
Prepared by
Karleen Nordquist..
The College of St. Benedict...
and St. John’s University...
with contributions by
Marianne Bradford..
The University of Tennessee...
Gregory K. Lowry….
Macon Technical Institute…..
WEED-O
Direct Labor Price Standard
The direct labor price standard is the rate
per hour that should be incurred for direct
labor.
This standard is based on current wage rates
adjusted for anticipated changes, such as
cost of living adjustments included in many
union contracts.
This standard generally includes employer
payroll taxes and fringe benefits, such as
paid holidays and vacations.
Direct Labor Quantity
Standard
The direct labor quantity standard is
the time that should be required to make
one unit of the product.
This standard is especially critical in
labor-intensive companies.
In setting this standard, allowances
should be made for rest periods, cleanup,
machine setup, and machine downtime.
A Case Study:
Direct Labor
The direct labor price standard per direct labor hour for
Xonic, Inc., is:
Item Price
Hourly wage rate $7.50
COLA .25
Payroll taxes .75
Fringe benefits 1.50
Standard direct labor rate per pound $10.00 Illustration 8-4
WEED-O
Manufacturing Overhead
Standard
For manufacturing overhead, a standard
predetermined overhead rate is used in setting
the standard.
This overhead rate is determined by dividing
budgeted overhead costs by an expected
standard activity index.
A Case Study:
Manufacturing Overhead
Xonic, Inc., uses standard direct labor hours as the activity index. The company expects to
produce 13,200 gallons of Weed-O. Since it takes two direct labor hours for each gallon, total
standard direct labor hours are 26,400 (13,200 x 2). At this level of activity, overhead costs are
expected to be $132,000, of which $79,200 are variable and $52,800 are fixed.
WEED-O
Total Standard Cost per
Unit
The total standard cost per unit is the sum of the standard costs of
direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead.
For Xonic, Inc., the total standard cost per gallon of Weed-O is $42, as
shown on the following standard cost card:
Illustration 8-7
Product: Weed-O Unit Measure: Gallon
Illustration 8-10
Study Objective 4
Total Variance
1 – 3
$13,020 – $12,000 = $1,020 U
Illustration 8-15
Causes of Materials
Variances
The causes of variances may relate to both internal and
external factors.
The investigation of a materials price variance usually
begins in the purchasing department.
– A variance may be beyond the control of purchasing
such as with inflation or actions by groups over which
the company has no control.
The starting point for determining the cause(s) of a
materials quantity variance is in the production
department.
– A variance may be beyond the control of production,
such as with inferior materials bought by purchasing.
Direct Labor Variances:
Total
The total labor variance is computed from the following
formula:
Actual Hours Standard Hours Total Labor
x Actual Rate – x Standard Rate = Variance
(AH) x (AR) (SH) x (SR) (TLV)
Illustration 8-16
In completing the order for 1,000 gallons of Weed-O, Xonic incurred
2,100 direct labor hours at an average hourly rate of $9.80. The
standard hours allowed for the units produced were 2,000 (1,000 x 2
hours) and the standard rate was $10 per hour.
The total labor variance is $580 ($20,580 - $20,000) unfavorable as
shown below:
Total Variance
1 – 3
$20,580 – $20,000 = $580 U
Illustration 8-20
Causes of Labor Variances
Labor price variances usually result from two factors:
– paying workers higher than expected wages, and
– misallocation of workers.
When companies are not unionized, there is a higher
likelihood of these variances.
The responsibility of these variances usually rests with the
manager that authorized the wage increase or the production
department.
Labor quantity variances relate to the efficiency of the
workers.
These variances are usually the responsibility of the
production department.
Study Objective 5
Total Overhead
Actual Overhead – Overhead Applied = Variance
Illustration 8-22
Thus, for Xonic, Inc., the total overhead variance is $900
unfavorable as shown below:
$10,900 – $10,000 = $900 U
The total overhead variance is generally analyzed through a price variance and a quantity
variance. The name usually given to the price variance is the overhead controllable
variance, whereas the quantity variance is referred to as the overhead volume variance.
Overhead Variances:
Controllable
The formula for the overhead controllable variance is:
Overhead
Actual Overhead
Overhead – Budgeted = Controllable
Variance
Illustration 8-24
Budgeted overhead is determined from the flexible manufacturing overhead budget for the
standard hours allowed.
For Xonic, budgeted overhead at the 2,000 standards hours is $10,400 ($4,400 fixed + [$3
variable cost per unit x 2,000]).
Thus, Xonic’s overhead controllable variance is $500 unfavorable as shown below:
Overhead
Overhead Overhead
Budgeted – Applied = Volume
Variance
Illustration 8-25
Normal Capacity
Overhead
Fixed Hours –
Overhead Rate – Standard Hours = Volume
Variance
Allowed
In Xonic, Inc., normal capacity is 26,400 hours for the year or 2,200
hours for a month (26,400 12), and the fixed overhead rate is $2 per
hour. Thus, the $400 unfavorable overhead volume variance can be
computed as shown below:
$2 x (2,200 – 2,000) = $400 U
Overhead Variances:
Summary
The total overhead variance of $900 (U), therefore,
consists of the following: Overhead controllable variance $500
Overhead volume variance 400 U
Illustration 8-28 Total overhead variance $900 U
Total Variance
1 – 3
$10,900 – $10,000 = $900 U
Illustration 8-29
Causes of Manufacturing
Overhead Variances
Since the controllable variance relates to variable
manufacturing costs, the responsibility for this variance
usually rests with the production department. The cause
of an unfavorable variance may be
– higher than expected use of indirect materials, indirect
labor, and factory supplies, or
– increases in indirect manufacturing costs, such as fuel
costs or maintenance.
The overhead volume variance is the responsibility of the
production department if the cause is inefficient use of
direct labor or breakdowns. If the cause is a lack of sales
orders, the responsibility rests elsewhere.
Study Objective 6
Manufacturing
ManufacturingOverhead
Overhead 10,900
10,900
Accounts
AccountsPayable/Cash/Acc.
Payable/Cash/Acc.Depreciation
Depreciation 10,900
10,900
(To
(Torecord
recordoverhead
overheadincurred)
incurred)
Work
Workin
inProcess
ProcessInventory
Inventory 10,000
10,000
Manufacturing
ManufacturingOverhead
Overhead 10,000
10,000
(To
(Toassign
assignoverhead
overheadto
tojobs)
jobs)
Finished
FinishedGoods
GoodsInventory
Inventory 42,000
42,000
Work
Workin inProcess
ProcessInventory
Inventory 42,000
42,000
(To
(Torecord
recordtransfer
transferof
ofcompleted
completedwork
workto
to
finished
finishedgoods)
goods)
Accounts
AccountsReceivable
Receivable 60,000
60,000
Cost
CostofofGoods
GoodsSold
Sold 42,000
42,000
Sales
Sales 60,000
60,000
Finished
FinishedGoods
GoodsInventory
Inventory 42,000
42,000
(To
(Torecord
recordsale
saleof
offinished
finishedgoods
goodsand
andthe
theCOGS)
COGS)
Illustration 8-32
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights
reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work
beyond that named in Section 117 of the 1976 United
States Copyright Act without the express written
permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
Request for further information should be addressed
to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for
his/her own use only and not for distribution or
resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for
errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of
these programs or from the use of the information
contained herein.
Chapter 8
Performance Evaluation Through
Standard Costs