EVALT 2 (1)
EVALT 2 (1)
KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE
AND SKILLS
Evaluation tools
-Related to assessment of
knowledge, attitude & Skills.
-EDUCATIONAL
/ACHEIVEMENT TESTS /
CLASS ROOM TESTS
ACHEVEMENT TESTS
Suggests
1.Stating the objectives
2.Spelling out the actions
3.Spelling out the criteria
4.Spelling out personnel whose judgments are
involved.
5.Stating arrangements for standardization
procedure.
-Maximum time
-Marks
-Nature of the test
-Nature & scope of units involved.
SL UNIT TIME MAX.MARKS
NO.
1. Single unit 40-45mts 20-25
BEFORE INSTRUCTION
-To determine readiness
-To place candidate /categorize
-To assess existing knowledge
DURING INSTRUCTION
-To assess learning
-To use as diagnostic tool
AFTER INSTRUCTION
-To assess the learning outcome
-To assess the level of mastery
-To grade
GENERAL PURPOSE
-To direct, stimulate, motivate
-To assess teaching effectiveness
Types of tests
1. 1 15 30
2. 2 10 20
3. 3 10 20
4. 4 5 10
5. 5 10 20
Marks- 50 100
2.WEIGHTAGE TO CONTENT
AREAS
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE COMPREHENSI APPLICATION ANALYSIS TOTAL
ON
Topic -1 7 5 4 4 20
Topic-2 6 6 4 4 20
Topic-3 6 6 3 3 18
Topic-4 2 5 5 2 14
Topic-5 4 5 5 2 16
Topic-6 5 6 1 0 12
Total 30 33 22 15 100
3.WEIGHTAGE TO FORM OF
QUESTIONS
SL NO. FORM OF QUESTION NUMBER OF MARKS PERCENTAGE
QUESTION
3. Long essay 1 10 20
31 50 100
4.WEIGHTAGE TO DIFFICULTY
LEVEL
SL NO: LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY MARKS PERCENTAGE
1. Easy 10 20
2. Average 30 60
3. Difficult 10 20
50 100
5.SCHEME OF OPTIONS
No options for any type of
questions.
6.SCHEME OF SECTIONS
Sect A- Objective type
Sect B-Short answer and essay type
3.SELECTING APPROPRIATE
TYPES OF QUESTIONS
Balanced selection of essay type,
short answer type & objective
type questions.
4. PREPARING RELEVANT TEST
ITEMS
-Matching test items with learning outcome.
-Selecting most representative items
-Preparing test items are of proper difficulty
level.
-Avoiding all barriers in test items which
prevent examinees from responding.
Avoiding clues to answers may help
-
Oral test
Written test
Performance test[Practical exam]
Written test
Analytical Scoring:
-Requires the instructor develop an ideal response
and create a scoring key or guide.
-The scoring key provides an absolute standard for
determining the total points awarded for a response.
-Student responses are compared to the scoring
standard and not to the responses of their classmates.
Holistic Scoring:
-The reader forms an impression of the overall
quality of a response and then transforms that
impression into a score or grade.
- The score represents the quality of a response
in relation to a relative standard such as other
students in the class.
3.Decide how handle factors that are
irrelevant to the learning outcomes being
measured.
4.Evaluate all answers to one question
before going to the next one.
5. Evaluate the answers with out looking at
the student name.
6. If especially important decisions are to be
based on the results obtain 2 or more
independent ratings.
7.BLUFFING - Special scoring problem
-It is possible for students to obtain higher
scores in essay questions than they deserve
by the mean of clever bluffing.
-Usually a combination of writing skill,
general knowledge and use of common tricks
like;
-Respond to every question.
-Stressing importance of topic.
-Agreeing with teachers opinion.
-Name dropping.
-Write on a related topic and “make it fit”.
-Writing in general terms that fit many
situation.
POOR -Discuss infective endocarditis. 8 marks
BETTER- Define infective endocarditis. List its signs &
symptoms & explain medical management of a patient
with inf. (1+3+4=8)
BEST-Mr. X ,45 years old male, is a soft ware engineer
having personal history of chronic smoking was admitted
in casualty with the complaint of chest pain, nausea,
dyspnea and diaphoresis. On assessment his heart rate was
112/min, blood pressure 100/60mm Hg & Trop test was
positive.(15marks)
A. What is the diagnosis of Mr.X
B. List risk factors for that particular
diagnosis
Advantages
1.Fill-in-the-blank type
2.Statement completion
3.Short answer in 5-10 words
4.Labeling a diagram
-Miss Florence Nightingale was born
in the year---
-List 3 ECG changes in myocardial
infarction.
PRINCIPLES
1.Do not take statements directly from text
books.
2.Direct question is more desirable than
incomplete statement.
3. Key words are omitted & blank come at
end of sentence.
4.Arrange spaces for recording answers on right
margin of question paper.
5.Give guide lines for answering each test items
very clearly.
6.Weightage for each question be written with
question.
3.OBJECTIVE TYPE QUESTIONS
Refers to any written test that
requires the examinee to select the
correct answer from among one or
more of several alternatives or
supply a word or two & that
demands on objective judgment
when it is needed.
Merits
Professional
- judgement about
student performance.
-Standards geared to progressive
development of skillful performance
appropriate to students level.
Levels
-Independent
-Supervised
-Assisted
-Provisional
-Dependent
c. Select & apply evaluation
methods
*OBSERVATIONS
1. Anecdotal Records
Accumulation of incidents
with out improvement by the
student that supports a decision to
fail a student or remove him/her
from the clinical area.
3. Rating scales
-Device which facilitates appraisal of
number of traits/ characteristics in reference
to a common qualitative scale of values.
-Provides scope of quantification of
judgment in relation to an observed
behavior of the student.
Rating scale may be 5-7 points
Superior- 5
Above average-4
Average-3
Poor-2
Very poor-1
TYPES
1.Descriptive Rating Scale
-Student name-
-Clinical Area-
-Date-
RATING ITEM 3- 2-INDEPENDENT 1-PARTLY
DEPENDENT DEPENDEN
T
Behavior
Problem solving
skill
Physical
Examination
History taking
Key
Students name:
Clinical area:
Date:
Behavior Excellent Very Good Fair Poor Very poor
5 4 3 2 1
1. Able to identify
priority needs of
patients
2.Communication
with patient
3.Evaluation of
the interventions.
Total score range : 3-15
13-15: Excellent
10-12: Very good
9-11: Fair
6-8: Poor
3-5 :Very poor
Signature of student & Instructor
3. The graphic rating scale
-Instructions
Place a tick mark on the line at its points
which best describes the person.
Name of student:
Class:
Date:
Sloppy worker Frequently makes Occasionally does Excellent worker
1 mistakes fine work 4
2 3
Careless about use Careless in use & Need help in Takes care of
of equipment handling of looking after equipment in a
equipment equipment at times. professional
manner, ensures
patients safety &
comfort.
Key
Date : Signature of
instructor
USES OF RATING SCALE
Rating scales can be used to
evaluate skills, outcome,
activities, interests &
attitudes.
ADVANTAGES
-Standard device which records qualitative &
quantitative judgment of the observed
performance
-Easy to administer & score
-Used for large groups of students
-Immediate feedback be provided to the students
DISADVANTAGES
-Term papers
-Research paper
-Care study analysis
-Journals
Criteria : Content, Organization, Process,
Writing style.
*ORAL PRESENTATION