Operating System

Course Instructor: Mirza Adnan Baig

Email ID: [email protected]

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Chapter 5a: CPU Scheduling

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Outline
 Basic Concepts
 Scheduling Criteria
 Scheduling Algorithms

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Objectives
 Describe various CPU scheduling algorithms
 Assess CPU scheduling algorithms based on scheduling criteria
 Explain the issues related to multiprocessor and multicore scheduling
 Describe various real-time scheduling algorithms
 Describe the scheduling algorithms used in the Windows, Linux, and
Solaris operating systems
 Apply modeling and simulations to evaluate CPU scheduling
algorithms

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Basic Concepts

 Maximum CPU utilization

obtained with multiprogramming
 CPU–I/O Burst Cycle – Process
execution consists of a cycle of
CPU execution and I/O wait
 CPU burst followed by I/O burst
 CPU burst distribution is of main
concern

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Histogram of CPU-burst Times

Large number of short bursts

Small number of longer bursts

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 CPU Scheduler
 The CPU scheduler selects from among the processes in ready
queue, and allocates a CPU core to one of them
• Queue may be ordered in various ways
 CPU scheduling decisions may take place when a process:
1. Switches from running to waiting state
2. Switches from running to ready state
3. Switches from waiting to ready
4. Terminates
 For situations 1 and 4, there is no choice in terms of scheduling. A
new process (if one exists in the ready queue) must be selected
for execution.
 For situations 2 and 3, however, there is a choice.

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Preemptive and Nonpreemptive Scheduling

 When scheduling takes place only under circumstances 1 and

4, the scheduling scheme is nonpreemptive.
 Otherwise, it is preemptive.
 Under Nonpreemptive scheduling, once the CPU has been
allocated to a process, the process keeps the CPU until it
releases it either by terminating or by switching to the waiting
state.
 Virtually all modern operating systems including Windows,
MacOS, Linux, and UNIX use preemptive scheduling
algorithms.

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Preemptive Scheduling and Race Conditions

 Preemptive scheduling can result in race conditions

when data are shared among several processes.
 Consider the case of two processes that share data.
While one process is updating the data, it is preempted
so that the second process can run. The second process
then tries to read the data, which are in an inconsistent
state.
 This issue will be explored in detail in Chapter 6.

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Dispatcher
 Dispatcher module gives control of the
CPU to the process selected by the CPU
scheduler; this involves:
• Switching context
• Switching to user mode
• Jumping to the proper location in the
user program to restart that program
 Dispatch latency – time it takes for the
dispatcher to stop one process and start
another running

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Scheduling Criteria

 CPU utilization – keep the CPU as busy as possible

 Throughput – # of processes that complete their execution
per time unit
 Turnaround time – amount of time to execute a particular
process
 Waiting time – amount of time a process has been waiting
in the ready queue
 Response time – amount of time it takes from when a
request was submitted until the first response is produced.

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Scheduling Algorithm Optimization Criteria

 Max CPU utilization

 Max throughput
 Min turnaround time
 Min waiting time
 Min response time

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 First- Come, First-Served (FCFS) Scheduling

Process Burst Time

P1 24
P2 3
P3 3
 Suppose that the processes arrive in the order: P1 , P2 , P3
The Gantt Chart for the schedule is:

P1 P2 P3
0 24 27 30

 Waiting time for P1 = 0; P2 = 24; P3 = 27

 Average waiting time: (0 + 24 + 27)/3 = 17

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 FCFS Scheduling (Cont.)

Suppose that the processes arrive in the order:

P 2 , P3 , P 1
 The Gantt chart for the schedule is:

P2 P3 P1
0 3 6 30

 Waiting time for P1 = 6; P2 = 0; P3 = 3

 Average waiting time: (6 + 0 + 3)/3 = 3
 Much better than previous case
 Convoy effect - short process behind long process
• Consider one CPU-bound and many I/O-bound processes

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Shortest-Job-First (SJF) Scheduling

 Associate with each process the length of its next CPU burst
• Use these lengths to schedule the process with the shortest time
 SJF is optimal – gives minimum average waiting time for a given set
of processes
• The difficulty is knowing the length of the next CPU request
• Could ask the user

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Shortest-Job-First (SJF) Scheduling

 Associate with each process the length of its next CPU burst
• Use these lengths to schedule the process with the
shortest time
 SJF is optimal – gives minimum average waiting time for a
given set of processes
 Preemptive version called shortest-remaining-time-first
 How do we determine the length of the next CPU burst?
• Could ask the user
• Estimate

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Example of SJF

ProcessArriva l Time Burst Time

P1 0.0 6
P2 2.0 8
P3 4.0 7
P4 5.0 3

 SJF scheduling chart

P4 P1 P3 P2
0 3 9 16 24

 Average waiting time = (3 + 16 + 9 + 0) / 4 = 7

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Example of Shortest-remaining-time-first

 Now we add the concepts of varying arrival times and preemption to

the analysis
ProcessA arri Arrival TimeT Burst Time
P1 0 8
P2 1 4
P3 2 9
P4 3 5
 Preemptive SJF Gantt Chart

P1 P2 P4 P1 P3
0 1 5 10 17 26

 Average waiting time = [(10-1)+(1-1)+(17-2)+(5-3)]/4 = 26/4 = 6.5

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Round Robin (RR)
 Each process gets a small unit of CPU time (time quantum q),
usually 10-100 milliseconds. After this time has elapsed, the
process is preempted and added to the end of the ready queue.
 If there are n processes in the ready queue and the time quantum
is q, then each process gets 1/n of the CPU time in chunks of at
most q time units at once. No process waits more than (n-1)q
time units.
 Timer interrupts every quantum to schedule next process
 Performance
• q large  FIFO
• q small  q must be large with respect to context switch,
otherwise overhead is too high

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Example of RR with Time Quantum = 4

Process Burst Time

P1 24
P2 3
P3 3
 The Gantt chart is:
P1 P2 P3 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
0 4 7 10 14 18 22 26 30

 Typically, higher average turnaround than SJF, but better response

 q should be large compared to context switch time
• q usually 10 milliseconds to 100 milliseconds,
• Context switch < 10 microseconds

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Time Quantum and Context Switch Time

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Priority Scheduling
 A priority number (integer) is associated with each process

 The CPU is allocated to the process with the highest priority (smallest
integer  highest priority)
• Preemptive
• Nonpreemptive
 SJF is priority scheduling where priority is the inverse of predicted next
CPU burst time

 Problem  Starvation – low priority processes may never execute

 Solution  Aging – as time progresses increase the priority of the

process

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Example of Priority Scheduling

ProcessA arri Burst TimeT Priority

P1 10 3
P2 1 1
P3 2 4
P4 1 5
P5 5 2

 Priority scheduling Gantt Chart

 Average waiting time = 8.2

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Priority Scheduling w/ Round-Robin
ProcessA arri Burst TimeT Priority
P1 4 3
P2 5 2
P3 8 2
P4 7 1
P5 3 3
 Run the process with the highest priority. Processes with the same
priority run round-robin

 Gantt Chart with time quantum = 2

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Multilevel Queue
 With priority scheduling, have separate queues for each priority.
 Schedule the process in the highest-priority queue!

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Multilevel Queue
 Prioritization based upon process type

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Multilevel Feedback Queue
 A process can move between the various queues.
 Multilevel-feedback-queue scheduler defined by the following
parameters:
• Number of queues
• Scheduling algorithms for each queue
• Method used to determine when to upgrade a process
• Method used to determine when to demote a process
• Method used to determine which queue a process will enter
when that process needs service
 Aging can be implemented using multilevel feedback queue

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Example of Multilevel Feedback Queue
 Three queues:
• Q0 – RR with time quantum 8 milliseconds
• Q1 – RR time quantum 16 milliseconds
• Q2 – FCFS
 Scheduling
• A new process enters queue Q0 which is
served in RR
 When it gains CPU, the process receives 8
milliseconds
 If it does not finish in 8 milliseconds, the
process is moved to queue Q1
• At Q1 job is again served in RR and
receives 16 additional milliseconds
 If it still does not complete, it is preempted
and moved to queue Q2

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 End of Chapter 5a

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018
 Example of Multilevel Feedback Queue
 Three queues:
• Q0 – RR with time quantum 8 milliseconds
• Q1 – RR time quantum 16 milliseconds
• Q2 – FCFS
 Scheduling
• A new process enters queue Q0 which is served RR
 When it gains CPU, the process receives 8 milliseconds
 If it does not finish in 8 milliseconds, it is moved to queue Q1
• At Q1 the process is again served RR and receives 16
additional milliseconds
 If it still does not complete, it is preempted and moved to queue Q2

Operating System Concepts – 10th Edition 5a.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2018