Chapter-1-definition-characteristics-and-guidance
Chapter-1-definition-characteristics-and-guidance
DEFINITION,
CHARACTERISTICS
AND GUIDANCE
OPERATIONS AUDIT
“Be a product of the product”
Hernan Murdock
BY BRINGING A
SYSTEMATIC, DISCIPLINED
APPROACH
This refers to the approach followed when performing the
work. This is encapsulated in the Standards. The Practice
guide and Practice Advisories, which provide a great deal of
guidance on how to plan, execute and communicate the
results of the work done.
Our methodology is quite extensive, and it provides enough
direction and flexibility as a framework to examine virtually
any aspect of an organization’s operations.
TO EVALUATE AND IMPROVE
EFFECTIVENESS
Our role as auditors goes beyond evaluating business dynamics and
writing reports that merely lists the problems identified. The
definition indicates that we evaluate, but also help to improve the
organization’s ability to achieve the goals and objectives related to:
Risk management – this refers to identification, measurement,
assessment and response to risks.
Control – this refers to those activities that mitigate relevant risks and
helps the organization avoid surprises.
Governance processes – corporate governance is a wide subject that
includes matters related to organizational structure, reporting lines, span
of control, resource allocation, accountability measures, discipline and
rewards mechanism. Auditors provide independent, objective
assessments on the appropriateness of the organization’s governance
structures and operating effectiveness of specific governance activities.
They are catalysts for change, advising, advocating improvements to
enhance the organization’s governance structure and practices.
If you look at the definition,
Internal auditing and
Operations auding are quite
similar
WHAT IS OPERATIONS
AUDITING?
Operational auditing is a future-oriented, independent,
systematic, and business-focused evaluation of
management, and the organization’s activities controlled by
management, and third parties.
This is done to benefit the organization’s stakeholders, who
trust internal auditors to identify anomalies, verify that
resources are handled responsibly, and that the organization
is structured and operating in ways that it is likely to
succeed.
OPERATIONAL AUDITING: IMPROVE
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFITABILITY AND
THE ATTAINMENT OF
ORGANIZATIONAL
These go beyond a review ofOBJECTIVES
internal control issues since
management does not achieve its objectives simply by
adhering to satisfactory systems of internal control. Instead,
management must define its goals, set appropriate
strategies, staff the organization with enough and
competent workers, and execute effectively.
OPERATIONAL AUDITING:
EVALUATING
MANAGEMENT’S
PERFORMANCE
Management have a fiduciary responsibility toward the
organization’s owners and other relevant stakeholders.
Over the past decade, the expectations of stakeholders
have increased monumentally creating a more challenging
environment for managers and auditors. These expectations
range from CSR, to acting ethically, safeguarding key
information, and maintaining a positive reputation.
OPERATIONAL AUDITING:
VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS
Another aspect of operational auditing is that rather than
merely verifying that employees are performing their duties
according to established policies and procedures, internal
auditors also verify a variety of qualitative aspects of the
organization and its activities.
Regarding procedures documentation, internal auditors are
expected to verify that these documents are up to date, that
they are relevant, that they reflect the best way to perform
the work with regards to efficiency and effectiveness, that
these documents are safe from unauthorized change, they
are understood by employees, and that their location is
known by employees so that they can refer to them for
guidance when there are questions.
OPERATIONAL AUDIT:
CONCERNED WITH
STRUCTURE OF THE
ORGANIZATION
Poorly structured organization, or one where information
does not flow accurately and promptly jeopardizes efforts to
achieve objectives. Instead, poorly structured organizations
tend to be disorganized, inefficient, have high employee,
customer and vendor turnover, and become wasteful.
All of these manifestations of dysfunction erode ingredients
for success and an auditor who brings a fresh and objective
perspective to the review can identify these weaknesses.
IN THE END, OPERATIONAL
AUDITING IS DESIGNED
TO…
Operational auditing is designed to evaluate the
effectiveness and efficiency of business activities,
processes, programs, functions and units.
KEYWORDS ON OPERATIONAL AUDIT AND
INTERNAL AUDIT
Internal Audit Operations Audit
Independence Future- oriented
Objectivity Independent
Assurance Systematic
Consulting Business-focused
Designed to add value Evaluation of management and activities
Improve and organization’s operations Improve organizational profitability and
attainment of organizational objectives
Help an organization accomplish its Evaluating of management performance
objectives
Systematic and disciplined approach Verification of documents and activities
To evaluate and improve effectiveness Concerned with the structure of the
organization
Evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency
of activities, process, programs, functions
and units
HOW CAN INTERNAL AUDITORS
ADD VALUE? *Internal Auditors
can add value by
recommending
steps on how to
Structure mitigate risks that
Implementatio
(Department, Units
Business n threaten business
and functions, objectives. The
Objectives (Processes,
management and anchor of
Activities)
employees) operational audit
are risks. No risks
identified means
no audit. We do
not just go testing
Internal controls, processes and policies the design and
implementation of
internal controls,
but our aim is to
Risks reduce the risks.
(Operational, Technological, Strategic,
Environmental, Legal and Financial)
RISK-BASED AUDIT
Engaging risk-based auditing means that internal auditors
must exercise and apply a broader view of organizational
risks. Accounting and financial risks are only a limited
number of the many risks organizations face. Other
examples include the risk of delays, waste, inefficiency, poor
customer service, excessive customer and employee
turnover, poor quality data, and systems failure.
RISK-BASED AUDIT IS WHAT THE
STANDARDS REQUIRE
Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) is the governing body of
internal auditors worldwide. It has issued guidance for
internal auditors in the form of the Standards for the
Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (the Standards),
Practice Advisories, Practice Guides, and Position Papers.
These documents provide guidance on what internal
auditors should do and how.
RISK-BASED AUDIT VS. CONTROL-
BASED AUDIT
This concept of risk-based auditing is in contrast to what has been
dubbed control-based auditing. The latter is defined as audits that
focus on identifying and evaluating internal controls without
enough regard to their value to the process.
This can happen because auditors take a pre-existing work
program without researching the nuances of the present audit
scope sufficiently,
Or even when they perform planning activities, their interviews
and other research only focuses on identifying existing controls
without fully understanding the key risks and objectives of the
process under review
WHAT RISK-BASED AUDIT
REQUIRES
Performing risk-based audits require more brainstorming, more
interaction with process owners, a more in-depth understanding of
the organization’s business, and a mechanism to address past,
present, and future vulnerabilities and scenarios that threaten the
achievement of business objectives.
Since internal auditors are being asked to do more with less, they
can’t afford to review controls just because they are there. Internal
auditors need to assess whether those controls are key to the
achievement of objectives and only focus on those that are.
IIA’S PUBLICATION ON 2015 COMMON
BODY OF KNOWLEDGE
The report advises internal auditors to anticipate the needs
of stakeholders, develop forward-looking risk management
practices, and support the business objectives, identify,
monitor and deal with emerging technology risks and
enhance audit findings through the greater use of data
analytics.
AUDITING BEYOND FINANCIAL,
ACCOUNTING AND REGULATORY
REQUIREMENTS
In the past, internal auditors predominantly had accounting
degrees, graduated from university accounting programs. As such,
their focus and experience was acquired in the accounting field and
saw most audit matters through the prism of accounting matters.
The other key focus area was compliance with regulatory
requirements. Auditors attempts to understand the rules and
regulations affecting a program or process, they then would apply a
very effective methodology: are they doing what the rulebook
says? If “Yes”, the result were satisfactory. If “No”, the results were
documented and communicated as findings. In essence, a very
predictable pass/fail approach to auditing.
COMPLIANCE AUDITS STILL
IMPORTANT
I am not suggesting that compliance is a failed effort, or that
it does not provide some benefits. It does. Some of the
benefits are process improvement, better controlled
operations, greater reliability and protection of information,
more stable and predictable process.
The idea is that, internal auditors should not just contain our
efforts to compliance checking. We are expected to do more
than that. We are expected to help clients achieve their
business objectives. Minimize business failures by helping
clients avoid poor management
BUSINESS FAILURE DUE TO POOR MANAGEMENT.
POOR MANAGEMENT REFERS TO
Operations management. Some issues are waste, inefficiencies, supplies that arrive
late, poor customer satisfaction, and limited capacity to grow as opportunities arise or
customers’ demand change.
Human resources. As evidenced by poorly supervised, trained, and evaluated
employees who sometimes become unmotivated and unproductive.
IT. computer systems designed with an inaccurate understanding of the business needs
and uses of these systems, poor data capture, inadequate reporting mechanisms.
Marketing. mass marketing of products and services at a time when customers prefer
to feel unique, or wasteful campaigns because they target the wrong audience.
CSR. Issues range from child labor, sweatshop conditions, abusive management, and
inappropriate waste disposal.
Environmental health and safety practices and conditions. Related to poor
ventilation, excessive heat, extreme noise levels, workplace hazards caused by
chemicals, machineries, etc.
In the light of these dynamics, internal auditors have risen
to the challenge by embracing a methodology that goes
beyond accounting and more closely aligns itself with the
recurring business risks and practices.
THE VALUE AUDITORS PROVIDE
Internal auditors are unfortunately not always regarded as highly as they
should be. Seen as an obstacle, too many managers and employees fail to
recognize that internal auditors provide a very valuable services to their clients
– whether they are employees of the firm, or hired externally to provide
internal audit services. (see next page)
Internal auditors promote the efficient and effective use of resources. Since
organizations operate with the funding received or authorized by their owners
or contributors, it is imperative that the organization operates with this
principle of financial fiduciary responsibility.
A fiduciary duty is a legal duty to act solely in another party’s interests. Parties
owing this duty are called Fiduciaries. The individuals to whom they owe a duty
are called Principals. Fiduciaries may not profit from their relationship with
their principals unless they have the principals’ express informed consent.
They also have the duty to avoid any conflicts of interest between themselves
and their principals or between their principals and the fiduciaries’ other
clients. (Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute)
BUSINESS FAILURE DUE TO POOR MANAGEMENT.
POOR MANAGEMENT REFERS TO
Operations management. Some issues are waste, inefficiencies, supplies that arrive
late, poor customer satisfaction, and limited capacity to grow as opportunities arise or
customers’ demand change.
Human resources. As evidenced by poorly supervised, trained, and evaluated
employees who sometimes become unmotivated and unproductive.
IT. computer systems designed with an inaccurate understanding of the business needs
and uses of these systems, poor data capture, inadequate reporting mechanisms.
Marketing. mass marketing of products and services at a time when customers prefer
to feel unique, or wasteful campaigns because they target the wrong audience.
CSR. Issues range from child labor, sweatshop conditions, abusive management, and
inappropriate waste disposal.
Environmental health and safety practices and conditions. Related to poor
ventilation, excessive heat, extreme noise levels, workplace hazards caused by
chemicals, machineries, etc.
FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP
Principal Fiduciary
• Stakeholder • Manageme
s nt
• Primary
• Secondary
In order to ensure that the fiduciary (management) acts in the interest of
the principal (not in the interest of themselves or of others), the BOD
requires the services of internal auditors. BOD wants to ensure that the
objectives of the organizations are being achieved efficiently and effectively.
This is the value that the auditor provides.
SHORT STORY OF STEWARDSHIP
A man who was going on a journey called his servants and entrusted them his
property. To one, he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to
his ability. Then he went away. He who had received five talents went at once and traded
with them, and he made five talents more. So also he who had the two talents made two
talents more. But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and his
master’s money.
Now, after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with
them. And he who received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying,
‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here I have made five talents more.’ His master said
to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I
will set you over much. Enter the joy of your master.’ So also he who had the two talents
made two talents came forward saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here I have
made two talents more.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant.
You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter the joy of your
master.’ He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to
be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, so
I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.’ But
his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I
have not sown and gathered where I scattered no seed? Then you ought to have invested my
money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with
interest. So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. For
everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who
has not, even what he has will be taken away.
MATERIALITY CONCEPT – USER PERSPECTIVE
Materiality
(The ability to change one’s decision)
Nature Amount
We look at the things which
We look at the amount,
are important to
then we compare it with
stakeholders, regardless of
our materiality threshold
amount
MATERIALITY CONCEPT – EXAMPLE
Nature Amount
WHOM Primary
stakeholders
Secondary stakeholders
DO WE Investors
Communities and
general public
SERVE? Creditors
Business support
groups
reviews to verify that what was done was done appropriately. This was a
practice that followed in the footsteps of public accounting firms, which
inspect transactions that occurred during the preceding fiscal year.
they were performed because the focus now leans toward an examination
of future threats and vulnerabilities that can derail the organization’s
goals and objectives in the short, medium, even the long-term.
In fact, focusing on future events and the future implications
of present events would add more value to their
organizations than reporting primarily on past events.
Extension
Communication skills (written and oral)
Leadership, influence, change catalyst
Research
Communication skills (written and oral)
Problem solving skills, change catalyst, influence, governance skills and ethics
sensitivity
Production
Book writing skills
Technical skills
WHAT COMPETENCIES DO I
HAVE
Fair technical skills
Fair communication skills
GAP ANALYSIS
Fair technical skills vs. proficient technical skills
Fair communication skills vs. excellent communication skills (oral
and written, English language)
Poor leadership, influence and change catalyst skills. Poor
persuasion skills.
Poor problem solving skills (inexperienced)
Governance skills, ethics sensitivity – fair
No book writing skills
Poor research skills
No computer programming literacy
STRATEGIES
Be active in PICPA trainings, if means permits to do so, once
a week training.
Attend research webinars, training and seminars
Attend book writing webinars, training and seminars
When ready, accept ad hoc responsibilities or administrative
functions such as in accounting and internal auditing.
Get a masters and doctoral degree.
CAREER AMBITION
Be a nationally recognized professor and practitioner,
improving the lives and profession of students and clients,
professionals and community through instruction, extension
(community) services, research and production
ROAD MAP
MASTER’S
CPA DOCTORAL CIA, CMA
DEGREE
will be identified.
1220A3
Internal auditors must be alert to significant risks that might
will be identified.
THE FUTURE THREATS AND
VULNERABILITIES CAN BE:
Operational Technological Strategic Environmental
• Maintaining • Protection of • Refer to • Reliable supply
Operational intellectual concerns of water and
capacity property and relating to: electricity
• Speed of information Strong • Achieving lower
execution (cycle • Denial of service customer and carbon foot print
time) attacks vendor • Reducing the
• Staffing levels • Business relations amount of
• Employee continuity due to Customer natural
motivation staff turnover loyalty resources used
• Knowledge • System Building during business
transfer development effective activities
• System (define, design, business
development test, implement partnerships
and software Outsourcing
implementation program) arrangements
Mergers and
acquisition
2120.A1 2130.A1
The internal audit activity must The internal audit activity must evaluate the
evaluate risk exposures relating to adequacy and effectiveness of controls in responding
organization’s governance, and to risks within the organization’s governance,
information system regarding the:
operations, and information systems regarding the:
Achievement of the organization’s
Achievement of the organization’s strategic
strategic objectives
objectives
Reliability and integrity of financial
Reliability and integrity of financial operational
operational information
information
Effectiveness and efficiency of
Effectiveness and efficiency of operations and
operations and programs programs
Safeguarding of assets Safeguarding of assets
Compliance with laws, regulations, Compliance with laws, regulations, policies,
policies, procedures and contracts procedures and contracts
2130 - CONTROL
The internal audit activity must assist the organization in
maintaining effective controls by evaluating their
effectiveness and efficiency and by promoting
continuous improvement.
Keywords What it means
Evaluating internal control Verifying whether controls are
effectiveness able to identify, prevent, correct,
mitigate or eliminate risks and
failure
Efficiency Avoid wasted resources, time or
effort while performing the control
activity
Promoting continuous Always search for faster, cheaper
improvement and better ways of performing
control activities.
2201-PLANNING
CONSIDERATIONS
In planning the engagement, internal auditor must consider:
1. The objectives of the activity being reviewed and the
means by which the activity controls its performance
2. The significant risks to the activity, its objectives,
resources and operations and the means by which the
potential impact of risk is kept to an acceptable level.
COMMENTARY
The standard is one of my favorites, it states that while planning the
engagements, we must consider the objectives of the entity, program, or
process being audited and how management controls its performance, as
well as the risk management procedures in place. Over the years, I have
found that:
A large number of employees have unclear or unknown objectives
The programs and processes they work in also lack clear objectives
When there are objectives, there are often few metrics in place to gauge
the achievement of these objectives
Risk identification, assessment and management procedures are limited
or nonexistent, so there is no clear mechanisms to ascertain what the
organization does to keep these risks at an acceptable level
“Given these gaps, internal auditors have many opportunities to
add value to their organization while they work on meeting the
requirements of this standard”
2220.A1-SCOPE OF THE
ENGAGEMENT
The scope of the engagement must include consideration of
relevant systems, records, personnel and physical
properties, including those under the control of third
parties.
2310-IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION
Internal auditors must identify sufficient, reliable, relevant
and useful information to achieve the engagement’s
objectives
Requirement Description
Sufficiency This means that the auditor needs
enough information, including
quantifiable facts and figures
Reliability The information must be trustworthy
and free from distortion
Relevance This relates to the information being
consistent with the objectives and
scope of the review
Usefulness This relates to the information helping
the organization accomplish its
objectives
Quite often, when clients express confusion, disagreement or
skepticism about the internal auditor’s communication, it is because
the auditor has not met one or more of these four attributes.
2330-DOCUMENTING
INFORMATION
Internal auditors must document relevant information to
support the conclusions and engagement results.
*Internal auditors must make sure that in all aspects of their work, they
base their conclusions and support their communications based on
facts.