Lecture-31
Lecture-31
PT
CORPORATE FINANCE
N
ABHIJEET CHANDRA
Vinod Gupta School of Management, IIT KHARAGPUR
EL
⮚ Order Quantity Problem in Inventory Management
PT
⮚ Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
N
Inventory Management
Benefits of Holding Inventory
• Stock-outs: the situation that occurs when a firm runs out of inventory. It may lead
to production delays and lost sales. To avoid this, maintain inventory.
• Manage seasonality in demand and supply: customers’ purchases might not match
the production cycles and availability of materials through suppliers. To keep it as
EL
little uncertain as possible, it is better to have sufficient inventory.
PT
Alternative approach to hold inventory:
N
• Just-in-time (JIT) inventory management: when a firm acquires inventory precisely
when it is needed. In this case, the inventory balance is always (close to) zero.
EL
• Carrying costs: warehousing, handling, clerical and staff, insurance, depreciation
and obsolescence (varying).
PT
• Ordering can mean either the purchase of the item or its production.
N
EOQ
Minimization of Costs
Total costs
EL
the level of CA
(i.e., Shortage
PT
Costs)
N
CA* Level of CA
EOQ: Assumptions
• Annual consumption of an item known with certainty,
• The rate of usage of an inventory steady over time,
• The order placed to replenish the stocks received at exactly that point in time
EL
when ‘inventory = 0’.
PT
• Ordering and carrying costs constant (i.e., do not change frequently).
N
EOQ: Derivation
• If usage of an inventory item is at a steady rate over a period of time and there is no
𝑸
safety stock, average inventory (in units) can be expressed as:
𝟐
• Average inventory =
� +
Total inventory costs are the sum of the total carrying costs plus total ordering costs:
�
•
�
EL
𝝏𝑻 𝑪
�
equal to zero, we obtain:
𝑺 −𝑶
PT
=𝟎 𝑸
• Now, solving for Q, we get: 𝝏𝑸 = 𝟐
N
𝟐
𝑺
𝑶
𝑸𝟐 𝑪
�
= 𝟐𝑶
𝑸𝟐 = 𝟐𝑶𝑺
𝑸∗ 𝑺�
�
�
=
, then, the optimal quantity
� �
Economic Order Quantity
2(O )
EOQ =
( S )C
• Where,
EL
• O: ordering costs per order,
S: total usage (in units) of an item of inventory
PT
•
• C: carrying costs per unit
N
EOQ: Graphical representation
EL
PT
N
Illustrative Example: EOQ
• The usage of an inventory item is 2,000 during a 100-day planning period,
ordering costs are $100 per order, and carrying costs are $10 per unit per
100 days.
• The EOQ amount, then, is: …….??
EL
PT
2($100)(2,000)
EOQ =
$10
N
• EOQ = 200 units
• With an order quantity of 200 units, the firm would order
(2,000/200) = 10 times during the period under consideration or,
in other words, every 10 days.
Illustrative Example: EOQ
A firm’s inventory planning period is one year. Its inventory requirement for the
period is 1,600 units. Assume that its acquisition costs are Rs. 50 per order. The
carrying costs are expected to be Re. 1 per unit per year for an item.
The firm can produce inventories in various lots as follows:
EL
• 1,600 units
• 800 units
PT
• 400 units
• 200 units
N
• 100 units
Which of these order quantities is the EOQ?
Illustrative Example: EOQ
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Size of order 1,600 800 400 200 100
(units)
No. of orders 1 2 4 8 16
Cost per order 50 50 50 50 50
(Rs.)
Total ordering 50 100 200 400 800
EL
costs (Rs.)
PT
Carrying cost per 1 1 1 1 1
unit (Rs.)
N
Avg. inventory 800 400 200 100 50
(Units)
Total carrying 800 400 200 100 50
costs (Rs.)
Total costs (Rs) 850 500 400 500 850
CONCLUSION
• One of the core issues inventory management deals with is how much to
order so that the costs can be minimized.
EL
• The costs include ordering costs and carrying costs.
PT
• Economic order quantity addresses the problem of the optimal order quantity
where the total costs of ordering and carrying is minimum.
N
REFERENCES
EL
⮚ Corporate Finance, 2nd ed. (2012), Clayman et al. Wiley
PT
⮚ Financial Management, 14th ed (2021), Pandey, Pearson
N
N
PT
EL