MOBILIZATION
MOBILIZATION
INDICATIONS,
CONTRAINDICATIO
NS AND EFFECTS
INDICATIONS
4. Progressive limitation
5. Functional immobility
1. PAIN, MUSCLE GUARDING, AND SPASM
• Painful joints, reflex muscle guarding, and muscle spasm can be treated
with gentle joint-play techniques to stimulate neurophysiological and
mechanical effects.
• NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS:
Small amplitude oscillatory movement & distraction
movements
Decreases pain
• MECHANICAL EFFECTS:
• Sustained or oscillatory stretch forces are used to distend the shortened tissue
mechanically.
3. POSITIONAL FAULTS/ SUBLUXATIONS
• A faulty position of one bony partner with respect to its opposing surface may result in
limited motion or pain.
• Occur with a traumatic injury, after periods of immobility, or with muscle imbalances.
• The faulty positioning may be perpetuated with maladapted neuromuscular control across
the joint, so whenever attempting active ROM, there is faulty tracking of the joint surfaces
resulting in pain or limited motion.
• MWM techniques attempt to realign the bony partners while the person actively moves the
joint through its ROM.
• Thrust techniques are used to reposition an obvious subluxation, such as a pulled elbow or
capitate-lunate subluxation.
4. PROGRESSIVE LIMITATION
• When a patient cannot functionally move a joint for a period of time, the joint
can be treated with non-stretch gliding or distraction techniques to maintain
available joint play and prevent the degenerating and restricting effects of
immobility
Non-thrust oscillation techniques
Grade Indications
Vary the speed of oscillations for different effects, such as low amplitude and high
speed, to inhibit pain or slow speed to relax muscle guarding.
Non-thrust sustained joint play
techniques
Grade Indications
Grade I With all gliding motions and may be
used for relief of pain.
Grade II Initial treatment to determine the
sensitivity of the joint.
Intermittently may be used to inhibit
pain.
To maintain joint play when ROM is not
allowed.
Grade To stretch the joint structures and thus
increase joint play.
Apply Grade I intermittent distraction for 7 to 10 seconds with a few seconds of rest in between for several
cycles. Note the response and either repeat or discontinue. T/t dosage is increased or decreased according
to joint reaction.
For restricted joints, apply a minimum of a 6-second stretch (Grade III) force followed by partial release (to
grade I or II), then repeat with slow, intermittent stretches at 3- to 4-second intervals.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
SR. NO. ABSOLUTE RELATIVE/PRECAUTIONS
Although, validity of these theories and to date no single theory has emerged as
being more widely accepted than others. So, pain reduction from joint mobilization/
manipulation is a multifaceted phenomenon.
2. PROMOTES MUSCLE RELAXATION
• Articular surfaces are avascular and receive their nutrition from synovial fluid. For diffusion
of nutrients to occur, the synovial fluid must circulate within the capsule to allow nutrients
to contact the articular surface.
• In normal joints, joint movement through functional activities provides a mechanism for the
circulation of synovial fluid.
• Joints that are restricted often cannot obtain adequate nutrition because insufficient range
of motion reduces movement of synovial fluid within the synovium.
• Even minimal displacement is believed to place abnormal stress on periarticular structures and
can be a source of pain and neuromuscular dysfunction.
• While some believe that the positional fault can be eliminated if the joint is
mobilized/manipulated in the direction of greatest restriction.
• Positional faults are believed to be more common in the spine than in the extremities.
6. ELIMINATE MENISCOID IMPINGEMENT
• Intracapsular meniscoid structures are present in some joints, most notably tibiofemoral and
spinal facet articulations.
• Facet menisci are believed to be capable of becoming entrapped, or impinged, between the
two facet joint surfaces, causing the joint surfaces to lock.
• This impingement is thought to occur most often with movement into spinal flexion and
rotation and is accompanied by pain.
• Spinal manipulation techniques that allow the facet joint surfaces to gap are thought to
release the entrapped meniscoid tissue and restore normal joint motion.
7. REDUCES SPINAL JOINT DISC HERNIATION
• Swelling secondary to joint impairments has been shown to be a cause of inhibition of muscles that act
on that joint. Some clinicians believe that this inhibition is decreased when normal joint mechanics are
restored using joint mobilization/manipulation techniques.
• Joint mobilization/manipulation performed through tissue resistance seems to have the effect of
increasing muscle strength in the short term, regardless of whether or not the joints receiving the
intervention are impaired.
• Also an inhibitive effect on specific muscles. And the muscles that showed inhibition are recognized as
those that often guard the impaired joints that were treated. It is therefore possible that these muscles
were in spasm.
• The evidence suggests that joint mobilization improves muscle performance, regardless of the presence
or nature of the muscle impairment.
9. SYSTEMIC PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
• Mobilization/manipulation can cause measurable changes in the physiology of
numerous remote tissues.
• Some studies shows that, after joint mobilization/manipulation heart rate and
blood pressure increased, and all measures of cutaneous (skin conductance,
skin temp., cutaneous blood flow) sympathetic nervous system function were
activated after the mobilization with movement technique, but were
unchanged after the placebo and control conditions.
• These studies indicate that some mobilization/manipulation techniques
produce a generalized sympathoexcitatory response. Nevertheless, the
relevance of an increase in sympathetic nervous system activity in the
treatment of joint impairments is unclear, other than its potential indirect
effect on pain reduction.
10. PLACEBO AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS
• With joint mobilization/manipulation intervention one common concern of
researchers is the potential threat to validity caused by a placebo effect. This is
especially the case in research involving the effect of manual techniques on pain
because these techniques have been shown in numerous studies to be powerful
placebos.
• Although clinicians are eager for patients to improve regardless of the reason
for the improvement, it is important to recognize that when treating patients
with pain, it is estimated that 30% of the effect is attributable to providing
attention and hands-on care to patients.
• Patients are better served if we choose techniques that have an effect on
outcomes beyond the effect of placebo.
• The effects of placebo are likely to have less of an influence on other outcomes,
such as range of motion.