unit 7.0
unit 7.0
A Level Economics
The price system and the micro economy
Background to Demand
• Where, TU = Total Utility, MU1 = Marginal Utility derived from 1 st unit, MUn =
Marginal Utility derived from n th unit
Marginal Utility (MU)
Assumptions:
We assume that marginal utility of money is constant.
We assume that our consumer is a rational human being and the main
aim is to maximize satisfaction.
Cont.
• Utility is additive, that is, utility received from the consumption
of a good depends on that good only.
• Each consumer has perfect information about the quality,
quantity, price of the good and other aspects about the
market. The information is perfectly vailable to all consumers.
It is an IDEAL WORLD.
DIMINISHING MARGINAL UTILITY
12
10 Packets TU
8 of chips in utils
Utility (utils)
6 0 0
4
1 7
2 11
2
3 13
0 4 14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2 5 14
6 13
12
Packets TU MU
of chips in utils in utils
10
Utility (utils)
0 0 -
8 7
1 7
6 2 11 4
3 13 2
4
4 14 1
2 5 14 0
6 13 -1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
14 Packets TU MU
of crisps in utils in utils
12
0 0 -
Utility
(utils)
10
1 7 7
8
2 11 4
6 3 13 2
4 14 1
4
5 14 0
2 6 13 -1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-2
MU
• MUx/Px = MUy/Py=……..MUn/Pn
• Where ,
• MUx= marginal utility of good X, Px= Price of good X
• MUy= marginal utility of good Y, Py= price of good Y
• MUn= marginal utility of good N, Pn= price of good N,
• MU of money is constant.
• The following example shows the clear knowledge about the law.
• Let us assume that a consumer has $ 19 to spend on two different commodities.
• Say good X and good Y
• Price of these goods are $2 per unit of X and $ 3 per unit of Y
Marginal utility schedule
1 24/2=12 18/3=6
2 20/2=10 15/3=5
3 16/2=8 12/3=4
4 12/2=6 9/3=3
5 8/2=4 6/3=2
6 4/2=2 3/3=1
• According to the law , the consumer would get maximum satisfaction, when she
consumes 5 units of good X and 3 units of good Y.
• MUx/Px =MUy/Py
• i.e. 8/2=4=12/3=4
• Spent money: $ 10 on good X to purchase 5 units and $ 9 on good Y to purchase 3 units.
• The total utility she derives from the consumption of these units are given as:
• Tux(5) = 24+20+16+12+8= 80
• TUy(3) = 18+15+12=45
• TUx(5) + TUy (3) = 80+45= 125 utils
• 125 utils are the maximum aggregate satisfaction that the consumer derives from her
given money income.
• Any other combination of both goods will not give her that much
satisfaction.
• For example, if she consumes 6 units of good X and 2 Units of good Y
• She gets,
• Tux (6)= 24+20+16+12+8+4=84
• TUy(2)= 18+15= 33
• TU=84+33= 117
• Thus the first combination is the best combination through which the
consumer is able to maximize her satisfaction from her given money
income because she is able to equalize the ratios of MU.
Figure of Equi marginal concept
OPTIMUM LEVEL OF CONSUMPTION
1 12 $ 4 8
2 10 $ 4 6
3 8 $ 4 4
4 6 $ 4 2
5 4 $ 4 0
P1
Total
consumer MU
expenditure
O Q1 Q
MU, P
Consumer surplus
Total
consumer
surplus
P1
Total
consumer MU
expenditure
O Q1 Q
MARGINAL UTILITY & THE DEMAND CURVE
A person’s demand curve [for a good] will be the same as their
MU curve for that good because the theory behind the law of
demand is diminishing marginal utility.
Consumption at Q1
a where P1 = MU
P1
MU = D
O Q1 Q
MU, P Deriving an individual person’s demand curve
Consumption at Q2
a where P2 = MU
P1
b
P2
MU = D
O Q1 Q2 Q
MU, P Deriving an individual person’s demand curve
Consumption at Q3
a where P3 = MU
P1
b
P2
c
P3
MU = D
O Q1 Q2 Q3 Q
Significance of MU Analysis
• It is a basis of some other laws of economics such as law of
demand.
• It is used in marginal decision-making by economic agents.
They equate Marginal Benefit (MU/MB or MR) with marginal
cost (P or MC).
Significance of MU Analysis
• Progressive taxation system is based on MU principle because
the rich have a lower marginal utility of money in comparison
to the poor.
• Marginal Utility Principle has been to resolve the Diamond-
Water Paradox( by Adam Smith and Carl Manger): The utility
theory assumes that consumers assign lower value to the goods
that yield lower satisfaction/utility. But the consumers assign
lower value to water than diamond, although water yields
higher satisfaction than diamond. This is the paradox of value.
• This paradox of value can be explained by differentiating the concept of total
utility and marginal utility.
• The total utility derived from water is higher than that derived from diamond
as water has multiple uses while diamond has a single use.
• However, the MU derived from water goes on decreasing as its consumption
increases while the MU derived from diamond increases as its stock with a
consumer increases.
• This is because water is abundantly available in nature while diamond is rare.
Due to this reason water is valued less than diamond. This shows that the
consumers assign value to the goods on the basis of the MU derived from
the goods.
Limitations of MU Analysis
• Same as diminishing MU theory
Numerical
• An individual reads Magazines and listens Music CD’s. The
following table shows utility he derives from consuming
different quantities of them over a period of time. The price of
Magazines is $1.50 and price of CD’s is $7.50. He has $30 to
spend on both the goods.
Numerical
Quantity Tua Mua Mua/Pa Tub Mub Mub/Pb Tuc Muc Muc/ Muc/
Pc 1 Pc 2
1 9 9 18 18 27 27
2 17 35 17 51
3 24 49 75
4 30 61 99
5 34 69 109
6 36 73 113
7 36 72 110
Numerical
1. What would be the consumer’s total utility from consumption of
these goods if he bought:
i) 4 units of A+ 2 units of B+ 3 units of C.
ii) 2 units of A+ 7 units of B+ 1 unit of C.
iii) 2 units of A+ 3 units of B+ 3 units of C.
2. Calculate marginal utilities for all goods.
3. Calculate the ratios between MU/P of the
respective goods.
4. Why the purchases in 1 does not optimize the level of satisfaction.
Numerical
5. Which combinations of goods gives the
consumer the maximum satisfaction.
6. If the price of good C fell to $6 per unit what
would happen to his combination of
purchases?
7. As a result of the fall in price of good C what
has happened to the level of demand for
good C?
Budget line
• A budget line shows all those combination of two goods that
can be purchased by spending the given money income.
• It explains the budgetary limitation of the consumer to
purchase commodities with the given prices of goods.
• In other words, a consumer’s attempt to maximize satisfaction
is governed by two factors, his money income and the prices of
goods
• For example:
• Income of a consumer= $200
• Price of good X= $10, price of good Y= $ 20
• Combination: A B C D E F
• Good X: 20 16 12 8 4 0
• Good Y: 0 2 4 6 8 10
• It is shown in the figure below:
Change in budget line
• If a change in price of one good, with income remaining
unchanged, then the budget line will pivot.
• For example: if the price of good X i.e. chicken wings falls, then
more units of this product can be purchased at given level of
income.
• The budget line will shift outward from its initial point as
shown in the following figure.
Change in money income of consumer
Change in prices of both goods
Change in price of one good
• For example:
• Income of a consumer= $200
• Price of good X= $10, price of good Y= $ 20
• Combination: A B C D E F
• Good X: 20 16 12 8 4 0
• Good Y: 0 2 4 6 8 10
• It is shown in the figure below:
Substitution effect
• As the price of good X has fallen in comparison to good Y
( whose price is unchanged), consumer will substitute good X
for good Y
• This is known as substitution effect of a change in price.
Income effect
• It is always the case that a rational consumer will substitute
towards the product which has become relatively cheaper.
• With the fall in price of X, the consumer actually has more
money to spend on other products including good X.
• Therefore real income has increased. It means that a consumer
may now actually purchase more units of product X, this is
income effect.