OB UNIT 4
OB UNIT 4
GROUP BEHAVOIUR
Group: We define a group as two or more individuals
interacting and interdependent, who have come
together to achieve particular objectives.
Two types
UNCERTAINTY
STATUS REDUCTION
• Similarity. People who have the same values or
characteristics as other members of their organization have
higher levels of group identification. Demographic similarity
can also lead to stronger identification for new hires, while
those who are demographically different may have a hard
time identifying with the group as a whole.
• Distinctiveness. People are more likely to notice identities
that show how they are different from other groups.
Respondents in one study identified more strongly with those
in their work group with whom they shared uncommon or
rare demographic characteristics. For example, veterinarians
who work in veterinary medicine (where everyone is a
veterinarian) identify with their organization, and
veterinarians in non-veterinary medicine fields such as animal
research or food inspection (where being a veterinarian is a
more distinctive characteristic) identify with their profession.
• Status. Because people use identities to define themselves and
increase self-esteem, it makes sense that they are most
interested in linking themselves to high-status groups.
Graduates of prestigious universities will go out of their way
to emphasize their links to their alma maters and are also
more likely to make donations. People are likely to not identify
with a low-status organization and will be more likely to quit
in order to leave that identity behind.
• Uncertainty reduction. Membership in a group also helps
some people understand who they are and how they fit into
the world. One study showed how the creation of a spin-off
company created questions about how employees should
develop a unique identity that corresponded more closely to
what the division was becoming. Managers worked to define
and communicate an idealized identity for the new
organization when it became clear employees were confused.
STAGES OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT
• The 5 stage Model:
• The first stage, forming stage, is characterized by a great
deal of uncertainty about the group’s purpose, structure,
and leadership. Members “test the waters” to determine
what types of behaviors are acceptable. This stage is
complete when members have begun to think of
themselves as part of a group.
• The storming stage is one of intra-group conflict.
Members accept the existence of the group but resist the
constraints it imposes on individuality. There is conflict
over who will control the group. When this stage is
complete, there will be a relatively clear hierarchy of
leadership within the group.
• In the third stage, close relationships develop and the
group demonstrates cohesiveness. There is now a strong
sense of group identity and camaraderie. This norming
stage is complete when the group structure solidifies and
the group has assimilated a common set of expectations
of what defines correct member behavior.
• The fourth stage is performing. The structure at this point
is fully functional and accepted. Group energy has moved
from getting to know and understand each other to
performing the task at hand.
• For permanent work groups, performing is the last stage
in development. However, for temporary committees,
teams, task forces, and similar groups that have a limited
task to perform, the adjourning stage is for wrapping up
activities and preparing to disband. Some group members
are upbeat, basking in the group’s accomplishments.
Others may be depressed over the loss of camaraderie
and friendships gained during the work group’s life.
Group decision making: Group decision-making commonly
known as collaborative decision-making is a situation
faced when individuals collectively make a choice from
the alternatives before them.
The decisions made by groups are mostly different from
those made by individuals. For example, groups tend to
make decisions that are more extreme than those made
by individual members, as individuals tend to be biased.
•Generate more complete • Time consuming
information and knowledge
• Conformity pressures
• Offer increased diversity
of views • Can be dominated by
one or few members
• Increased acceptance of a
solution • Suffers from
ambiguous
responsibility
TWO BY PRODUCTS OF GROUP
DECISION MAKING
NOMINAL GROUP
INTERACTING TECHNIQUE
GROUPS
Communication and
Communication and collaboration are essential
Communication and collaboration among members within a team, with regular
Collaboration may vary and may not be a interactions, information
primary focus. sharing, and collective decision-
making.
Basis Group Team