0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views49 pages

braun_ma4_inppt_10

Chapter 10 discusses decentralization and various responsibility centers, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of decentralization, as well as the importance of performance evaluation systems. It covers performance reports, ROI calculations, and the balanced scorecard approach, emphasizing the need for both financial and non-financial performance measures. Additionally, it addresses transfer pricing and flexible budgeting, providing insights into effective management practices.

Uploaded by

mfarrej
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views49 pages

braun_ma4_inppt_10

Chapter 10 discusses decentralization and various responsibility centers, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of decentralization, as well as the importance of performance evaluation systems. It covers performance reports, ROI calculations, and the balanced scorecard approach, emphasizing the need for both financial and non-financial performance measures. Additionally, it addresses transfer pricing and flexible budgeting, providing insights into effective management practices.

Uploaded by

mfarrej
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 49

Performance Evaluation

Chapter 10
Objective 1
Understand decentralization and describe
different types of responsibility centers

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


2
Ltd.
Decentralization
• Splitting operations into different operating segments
• Advantages
– Frees top management’s time
– Use of expert knowledge
– Improves customer relations
– Provides training
– Improves motivation and retention
• Disadvantages
– Duplication of costs
– Potential problems achieving goal congruence
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 3
Performance Evaluation Systems
– Provide upper management with feedback
– To be effective, performance evaluation systems
should:
• Clearly communicate expectations
• Provide benchmarks that promote goal congruence
and coordination between segments
• Motivate segment managers

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


4
Ltd.
Responsibility Accounting
• Responsibility Center—part of an organization
whose manger is accountable for planning and
controlling activities.

• Responsibility Accounting—system for


evaluating performance of each responsibility
center and its manger.

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


5
Ltd.
Types of Responsibility Centers

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


6
Ltd.
Objective 2
Develop performance reports

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


7
Ltd.
Responsibility Center Performance Reports

• Performance report—Compares actual


revenues and expenses to budgeted figures
• Variance—Difference between actual and
budget
– Favorable variance: Causes operating income to be
higher than budgeted
– Unfavorable variance: Causes operating income to
be lower than budgeted
• Management by exception
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 8
Exhibit 10-3: Partial Performance Report for
Revenue Center

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


9
Ltd.
Segment Margin
The operating income generated by a profit or
investment center before subtracting common
fixed costs that have been allocated to the
center.

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 10


Exhibit 10-4: Performance Report Highlighting Segment Margin

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


11
Ltd.
Organization-Wide Performance Reports

• Performance reports for each level of


management flow up
• Controllable vs. uncontrollable variances

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 12


Objective 3
Calculate ROI, sales margin, and capital
turnover

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 13


Evaluation of Investment Centers
• Duties of investment center manager similar
to CEO
• To assess performance
– Return on Investment (ROI)
– Residual Income (RI)

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


14
Ltd.
Return on Investment (ROI)
• Measures the amount of income an
investment center earns relative to the size of
its assets
• ROI = Operating income
Total assets

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


15
Ltd.
Sales Margin and Capital Turnover
• ROI = Operating income x Sales___
Sales Total assets

(ROI = Sales margin x Capital turnover)

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


16
Ltd.
S10-6

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


17
Ltd.
S10-6
Functional ingredients
• Sales margin $5,720 / $22,000 = 26.0%
• Capital turnover $22,000 / $10,000 = 2.2
• ROI 26.0% x 2.2 = 57.2%

Consumer markets
• Sales margin $2,675 / $21,400 = 12.5%
• Capital turnover $21,400 / $10,700 = 2.0
• ROI 12.5% x 2.0 = 25%

Performance markets
• Sales margin $4,810 / $18,500 = 26.0%
• Capital turnover $18,500 / $18,500 = 1.0
• ROI 26.0% x 1.0 Copyright
= 26.0% © 2015 Pearson Education,
18
Ltd.
Residual Income
• Determines whether the division has created
any excess (residual) income above
management’s expectations
• Incorporates target rate of return

RI = Operating income - minimal acceptable income

RI = Operating income - (target rate of return x total assets)

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


19
Ltd.
S10-9

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 20


S10-9

Office wear = $35,000 – ($52,000  15%) = $27,200


Casual wear = $29,000 – ($48,000  15%) = $21,800

Both categories have positive residual income. This means that


the divisions are earning income at a rate that exceeds
management’s minimum expectations. This result is consistent
with the ROI calculations.

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


21
Ltd.
Goal Congruence
Residual Income enhances goal congruence,
whereas ROI may or may not

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


22
Ltd.
Measurement Issues
• Which balance sheet data should we use?
• Should we include all assets?
• Should we use gross book value or net book
value of the assets?
• Should we make other adjustments to income
or assets?

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 23


Limitations of Financial Performance
Evaluation
• Short-term focus
• Potential Remedy: management can measure
financial performance using a longer time
horizon
– Incentivizes segment managers to think long term
rather than short term

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 24


Objective 4
Describe strategies and mechanisms for
determining a transfer price

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 25


Transfer Pricing
• The price charged for the internal sale
between two different divisions of the same
company
• Encourage transfer only if the company would
benefit by the exchange
• Vertical Integration

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 26


Exhibit 10-9: Strategies to Determine Transfer
Price

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 27


Global Considerations
• Do the divisions operate under different taxing
authorities such that income tax rates are
higher for one division?
• Would the amount paid to customs and duties
be impacted by the transfer price used?

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 28


Objective 5
Prepare and evaluate flexible budget
performance reports

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 29


Flexible Budget
• A budget prepared for a different level of volume than that which
was originally anticipated
• Master Budget Variance—Difference between the actual
revenues and expenses and the master budget
– “Apples-to-oranges” comparison

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 30


Exhibit 10-11 Creating a Flexible Budget Performance Report

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


31
Ltd.
Volume Variance
• The difference between the master budget
and the flexible budget
– Arises only because the actual volume differs from
the volume originally anticipated in the master
budget

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 32


Exhibit 10-12 Volume Variances

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 33


Flexible Budget Variance
The difference between the flexible budget and
the actual results

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


34
Ltd.
Exhibit 10-13 Flexible Budget and Volume Variances

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


35
Ltd.
Underlying Causes of the Variances
• Management by exception
• Use performance reports to see how
operational decisions affected company’s
finances

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 36


Master Budget Variance: A Combination of
Variances

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


37
Ltd.
Objective 6
Describe the balanced scorecard and
identify KPIs for each perspective

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


38
Ltd.
Nonfinancial Performance Measurement

• Lag indicators—Reveal the results of past


actions and decisions
• Lead indicators—Predict future performance

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


39
Ltd.
The Balanced Scorecard
• Management must consider both financial and
operational performance measures
• Major shift: Financial indicators are no longer
the sole measure of performance

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 40


Four Perspectives of the Balanced
Scorecard
• Financial
• Customer
• Internal business
• Learning and growth

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 41


Key Performance Indicator (KPI)
• Summary performance metric; assesses how
well the company is achieving its goals
• Continually measured
• Reported on performance scorecard or
performance dashboard

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 42


Financial Perspective
• “How do we look to shareholders?”
• Must continually attempt to increase profits
– Increase revenues
– Control costs
– Increase productivity

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd. 43


Customer Perspective
• “How do customers see us?”
• Customers concerned with four
product/service attributes:
– Price
– Quality
– Sales service
– Delivery time

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


44
Ltd.
Internal Business Perspective
• “At what business processes must we excel to
satisfy customer and financial objectives?”
• Three factors:
– Innovation
– Operations
– Post-sales support

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


45
Ltd.
Learning and Growth Perspective
• “Can we continue to improve and create
value?”
• Three factors:
– Employee capabilities
– Information system capabilities
– Company’s “climate for action”

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


46
Ltd.
Sustainability and Performance Evaluation

• Sustainability—Related KPIs
• Fifth perspective—“Sustainability”
• Sixth perspective—“Community”

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


47
Ltd.
End of Chapter 10

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


48
Ltd.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior
written permission of the publisher.

Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education,


49
Ltd.

You might also like