Consent (1)
Consent (1)
Illustration
• ‘B’ gives his car, causing his agreement to be coerced. ‘A’
threatens to hurt ‘B’ if he doesn’t give his son, ‘C’ a large sum
of money. ‘B’ believes the threat and gives ‘C’ the money. This
agreement is believed to be coerced.
•
Definition of Undue Influence (Section 16)
• A contract is said to be induced by ‘undue influence’ where the relations
subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a
position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain
an unfair advantage over the other. A contract is said to be induced by
‘undue influence’ where the relations subsisting between the parties are
such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the
other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.”
• In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing
principle, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of
another—
• (a) where he holds a real or apparent authority over the other, or where
he stands in a fiduciary relation to the other; or
• (b) where he makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is
temporarily or permanently affected by reason of age, illness, or mental or
bodily distress.
• (3) Where a person who is in a position to dominate the will
of another, enters into a contract with him, and the
transaction appears, on the face of it or on the evidence
adduced, to be unconscionable, the burden of proving that
such contract was not induced by undue influence shall be
upon the person in a position to dominate the will of the
other. Nothing in the sub-section shall affect the provisions of
section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
• Illustration James, an old man suffering from cancer, is
induced by Daniel, his doctor, to pay a huge amount for his
treatment. James transfers the money to Daniel’s account.
Here, Daniel employs undue influence.
Fraud under the Indian Contracts Act