Physical Science_q4_l4_newton’s Law of Inertia vs (1)
The document discusses the distinction between Galileo's assertion on horizontal motion and Newton's first law of motion, focusing on the concept of inertia. Galileo proposed that an object in motion would continue to move at a constant velocity in the absence of friction, while Newton defined force and its relationship to motion. The key difference lies in Newton's formalization of force, which Galileo did not fully understand.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views17 pages
Physical Science_q4_l4_newton’s Law of Inertia vs (1)
The document discusses the distinction between Galileo's assertion on horizontal motion and Newton's first law of motion, focusing on the concept of inertia. Galileo proposed that an object in motion would continue to move at a constant velocity in the absence of friction, while Newton defined force and its relationship to motion. The key difference lies in Newton's formalization of force, which Galileo did not fully understand.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17
Newton’s Law of
Inertia vs. Galileo’s
Assertion on Horizontal Motion JAZZREL JUN R. PALCONE, LPT MELCS
Explain the subtle distinction
between Newton’s 1st Law of Motion (or Law of Inertia) and Galileo’s assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion OBJECTIVES: Define what is inertia. Differentiate between Galileo’s assertion and Newton’s first law of motion. Reflects the importance of force in the real – life. Who was Galileo Galilei? What were his contributions to the concept of inertia?
Galileo Galilei was an Italian
scientist who first explained the concept of inertia. He observed that when a ball rolls down an inclined plane, its speed increases; and when it rolls upwards, its speed decreases. This change in speed was due to gravity. Question
Aball rolling on the floor is not
moving with or against gravity, so what would happen to its speed? Answer Galileo thought that the ball rolling on a floor would remain moving with constant velocity if the friction between the floor and ball would be removed. Galileo tested his theory in an experiment using two inclined planes. When the ball was rolled from one inclined plane to the next, it almost reached the height from which it was released as shown in Figure A. If the steepness of the second inclined plane is decreased, the ball would still reach the same height from the point it was released as shown in Figure B. Finally, he then removed the second inclined plane and watched the ball as shown in Figure C. He observed the ball and made his conclusion: the ball would continue to move in a straight line with constant speed. Galileo asserted that if friction was absent, the ball would continue to move with constant velocity. It would continue its state of motion unless a push or a pull compels it to change that state. Galileo called this tendency of materials to resist change in their state of motion as inertia. Inertia, a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external force. His assertion was the inspiration for Newton’s 1st law of motion. They both implied that no force is needed to keep the motion of an object and the object’s inertia would keep it from changing its state of motion. Is there a difference between Galileo’s assertion and Newton’s first law of motion? There is a subtle difference. The difference lies in the concept of force. Galileo knew about friction but did not know about the concept of force. He used the term 'push and pull' to signify forces. It was Sir Isaac Newton who defined the concept of force and its relation to motion. Activity 1: Conduct a research about the given question, then write your findings in ½ lengthwise. ( minimum of 100 words)
Since there is no gravity in space,
will it be easier to lift a sack of rice in space compared here on earth? What does the law of inertia and Galileo’s assertion tell us about this? KEY POINTS • The concept of inertia was a result of Galileo’s studies of motion. • Inertia refers to the tendency of any material to change its state of motion. • Galileo asserted that if a rolling ball was ‘left alone’ it will continue to move with constant velocity. • The only difference between Galileo’s assertion and Newton’s first law of motion is the concept of force. • Galileo did not know yet the concept of force, and it was Newton who finally explains the nature of forces. POST TEST 4.4 1. What property of matter tends to resists a change in an object’s state of motion? • A. mass • B. volume • C. inertia • D. force Who was the scientist who first explained the concept of inertia? • A. Galileo Galilei • B. Sir Isaac Newton • C. Nicolas Copernicus • D. Aristotle 3. Which of the following is Galileo’s assertion on horizontal motion? • A. No force is needed to start the motion of an object. • B. No force is required to decrease or increase the motion of an object. • C. When an object is left alone, it will continue to move with constant velocity. • D. The inertia of an object will keep the object moving with constant velocity. 4. What is the difference between Galileo’s assertion of horizontal motion and Newton’s 1st law of motion? • A. Newton’s inertia is based on mass, while Galileo’s inertia is based on weight. • B. Newton’s 1st law emphasizes that a force is required to keep the motion of the object. • C. Galileo did not use the concept of force in his assertions but only used 'push or pull'. • D. Galileo asserted that a force is needed to keep the motion of the object. When a ball rolls on the floor, it will eventually stop. 5. What force causes the ball to stop? • A. weight • B. inertia • C. gravity • D. friction