St.

MARTIN’S ENGINEERING COLLEGE

UGC Autonomous
NBA & NAAC A+ ACCREDITED
Dhulapally, Secunderabad– 500100

Department of Computer Science And Engineering

AI-ENHANCED PLAGIARISM DETECTION USING ADAPTIVE

NEURAL NETWORKS
Batch No:A23
1. N. SHARAN (22K81A0543)
2. N. SIVA SANKAR (23K85A0503)
3. A. SAI SRI (22K81A0505)

Under the Guidance of

Mr. D. Praneel
Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science And Engineering
 OUTLINE

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Literature Survey
4. Existing System
5. Proposed System
6. System Requirements
7. Modules
8. References
14-02-25 2
 ABSTRACT
Plagiarism detection plays a crucial role in academic integrity, content
originality verification, and research publication security. Traditional
plagiarism detection methods rely on keyword matching and similarity
analysis, which often fail to detect paraphrased or intelligently altered content.
This project proposes an AI-enhanced plagiarism detection system using
Adaptive Neural Networks, integrating Natural Language Processing (NLP)
and deep learning techniques to identify copied content across diverse textual
sources. The system leverages contextual embeddings, semantic similarity
measures, and adaptive learning mechanisms to improve detection accuracy,
ensuring a robust and scalable solution for educational institutions, publishers,
and businesses.

14-02-25 3
 INTRODUCTION
• Plagiarism detection has become increasingly challenging due to advanced
text-rewriting techniques and the availability of paraphrasing tools. Traditional
detection systems utilize rule-based approaches that primarily focus on direct
text matches, making them ineffective against intelligently modified content.
• AI-driven plagiarism detection systems leverage deep learning and NLP to
analyze contextual meaning, sentence structure, and semantic relationships in
texts. Neural networks, particularly transformer-based models, can detect
reworded content by understanding the underlying meaning rather than relying
solely on word similarity.

14-02-25 4
 INTRODUCTION
• This project aims to develop an advanced plagiarism detection system using
Adaptive Neural Networks, incorporating attention-based architectures and
semantic text comparison techniques. The system will process large text
databases, compare document similarities, and provide detailed plagiarism
reports with highlighted sections.
• By integrating AI-powered plagiarism detection, institutions can enhance
content originality verification, ensure compliance with ethical standards, and
prevent unauthorized content duplication.

14-02-25 5
 LITERATURE SURVEY
S. No Author Title Year Contributions

Uses deep learning techniques,

1 AI in Text Similarity Analysis for such as LSTMs, to predict traffic
Brown, T., & White, M. 2021
Plagiarism Detection. flow and optimize signal timings
in smart cities.

2 The research discusses CNN and

Deep Learning for Contextual
Singh, R., & Patel, K. 2020 LSTM applications in detecting
Plagiarism Identification paraphrased content.

This paper evaluates word

3
Machine Learning Models for Text embeddings and contextual
Nguyen, L., & Sharma, P. 2021 analysis techniques.
Anomaly Detection.

14-02-25 6
 LITERATURE SURVEY
S. No
Author Title Year Contributions

4 The authors present supervised

Martinez, D., & Johnson, Machine Learning Models for Text
2022 and unsupervised approaches for
S. Anomaly Detection detecting duplicate content.

This study analyzes AI-driven

Neural Network-Based Plagiarism techniques for maintaining
5 Garcia, H., & Lewis, F. 2023 research integrity.
Detection in Academic Research.
.

14-02-25 7
 EXISTING SYSTEM
• Traditional plagiarism detection systems face several limitations:
1. Rule-Based Matching Algorithms
1. These systems primarily rely on predefined rules to match content and detect similarities. However, they struggle
when dealing with paraphrased content, where the meaning remains the same, but the words are altered. As a
result, they are ineffective at identifying sophisticated forms of plagiarism such as reworded text.
2. Limited Contextual Understanding
1. Traditional systems typically focus on surface-level text comparison, which leads to false positives. For instance,
common phrases or widely used expressions may be flagged as plagiarism even if they are not directly copied
from another source. This lack of deeper contextual understanding results in inaccurate detection.
3. High Computational Costs
1. When comparing large datasets or documents, traditional plagiarism detection systems often require significant
computational power. This makes them inefficient, especially for large-scale plagiarism checks in academic
research or other areas with vast volumes of text to analyze. The processing time and resources needed can be
prohibitively expensive.
4. Lack of Adaptability
1. These systems are not well-equipped to keep up with evolving techniques used to modify text. As new methods
of paraphrasing, summarizing, or obfuscating content emerge, traditional systems struggle to adapt. Their
inability to update or improve in real time means they are constantly lagging behind newer ways of circumventing
detection.
14-02-25 8
 PROPOSED SYSTEM
• The proposed system integrates deep learning, natural language processing (NLP), and
adaptive neural networks to improve plagiarism detection. Key advantages include:
1.Context-Aware Detection with Transformer Models
1. Utilizes transformer-based models for deeper context understanding, allowing
detection of paraphrased and reworded content, beyond simple string matching.
2.Improved Accuracy for Paraphrased and Semantically Similar Content
1. Detects paraphrased or semantically altered content with high precision by
analyzing the meaning, not just the exact wording.
3.Scalable Architecture for Large Document Repositories
1. Built to handle large volumes of text efficiently, ensuring fast plagiarism detection
even in extensive document databases.
4.Real-Time Reporting with Explainable AI Insights
1. Provides instant plagiarism reports with clear, explainable AI-driven insights,
offering transparency into the detection process.
14-02-25 9
 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Hardware Requirements:

 System : Pentium IV 2.4 GHz.

 Hard Disk : 40 GB.

 Floppy Drive : 1.44 Mb.

 Monitor : 14’ Colour Monitor.

 Mouse : Optical Mouse.

 Ram : 512 Mb.

07/03/2025 10
 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Software Requirements:

 Operating system : Windows 7 Ultimate.

 Coding Language : Python.

 Front-End : Python.

 Designing : Html,css,javascript.

14-02-25 11
 MODULES
 Text Preprocessing and Tokenization Module: Processes raw text data for analysis.

 Semantic Feature Extraction Module: Uses NLP embeddings to derive contextual representations.

 Adaptive Neural Network Detection Module: Identifies plagiarism using deep learning models.

 Similarity Scoring and Report Generation Module: Computes similarity scores and highlights plagiarized sections.

 Database and Cloud Integration Module: Enables scalable document comparison and storage.

 Module-wise Description
The text preprocessing module cleans and tokenizes input text to prepare it for analysis. The semantic feature extraction
module applies word embeddings and contextual analysis to derive meaningful representations. The adaptive neural network
detection module leverages deep learning models to compare texts and detect plagiarism. The similarity scoring module
generates detailed reports with plagiarism percentages and highlighted sections. The cloud integration module enables large-
scale document storage and retrieval.

14-02-25 12
 REFERENCES
[1].S.M.Alzaharani, N. Salim and A. Abraham, “Understanding plagiarism linguistic patters,
Textual Features and detection methods” in IEEE traction on System, man and Cybermetics,
PartC: Application and review. Vol.PP,2011, pp.1-1
[2]. S. Meye Zu Eissen and B.Stein, Intrinsic plagiarism detection, in Advances in Information
Retrieval 28th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2006, pp 565-569.
[3]. S.Alzaharani and N. Salim, “ Fuzzy semantic based string similarity for extrinsic plagiarism
detection:Lab Report for PAN at CLFE’10”, in Proc 4th Int.Workshop PAN-10, padua Italy,2010.
[4]. Suphakit Niwattanakul, Jatsada Singthongchai, Ekkachai Naenudorn and Supachanun
Wanapu, ―Using of jaccard Coefficient for Keyword Similarity ‖, published in Proceedings of the
International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2013 Vol I, IMECS 2013,
March 13 - 15, 2013, Hong Kong

14-02-25 13
 REFERENCES
[5] S. G. Gupta, N. K. Sharma, and H. R. Singh, ‘‘Optimization of traffic signal timings using
genetic algorithm and real-time data,’’ Int. J. Traffic Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 121–130, Aug.
2023.
[6] M. D. Patel, R. N. Mehra, and S. K. Sharma, ‘‘Smart traffic management using IoT and
machine learning algorithms for urban traffic control,’’ Int. J. Traffic Comput., vol. 17, no. 5, pp.
243–257, Oct. 2021.
[7] K. L. Green, M. A. Park, and J. S. Kim, ‘‘Adaptive traffic signal control using deep learning-
based models for real-time optimization,’’ IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp.
1921–1932, Apr. 2022.
[8] L. H. Zhang, F. Q. Chen, and P. J. Liu, ‘‘Cloud-based traffic monitoring and prediction for
intelligent transport systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 5040–5048, Jun.
2023.

14-02-25 14
 QUERIES ??

14-02-25 15
 THANK YOU

14-02-25 16