The document discusses the evolution of anthropological thought, highlighting key theoretical orientations such as unilineal evolutionism, historical particularism, and British functionalism. It outlines the contributions of significant figures like E.B. Tylor and Franz Boas, and addresses contemporary approaches including evolutionary psychology, materialism, and interpretive anthropology. The text emphasizes the lack of a unifying theoretical orientation in modern anthropology due to the diversity of cultures and the complexities of human behavior.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views
PB Humanity 10e PPTs Chapter 5
The document discusses the evolution of anthropological thought, highlighting key theoretical orientations such as unilineal evolutionism, historical particularism, and British functionalism. It outlines the contributions of significant figures like E.B. Tylor and Franz Boas, and addresses contemporary approaches including evolutionary psychology, materialism, and interpretive anthropology. The text emphasizes the lack of a unifying theoretical orientation in modern anthropology due to the diversity of cultures and the complexities of human behavior.
E. B. Tylor Levels of Religion In 1871, Primitive Culture was published by Tylor. The earliest forms and levels of religion are outlined. He believed that the most primitive of cultures practice a form of animism. Animism: Belief in spiritual beings
E. B. Tylor Levels of Religion All other religions would have grown or evolved from animism Animism Polytheism Monotheism (ultimately the most evolved form of religion)
Historical Particularism Imparted idea that cultural relativism as a methodical principle is essential for the most accurate understanding of another culture Demonstrated and popularized the
notion that cultural differences and
biological differences have little to do with each other
Configurationalism Born from historical particularism, configurationalism is the theoretical idea that each culture historically develops its own unique thematic patterns around which beliefs, values, and behaviors are oriented.
British Functionalism (1920s-1960s) Bronislaw Malinowski A leading British Functionalist who emphasized the needs of the individual Felt that main purpose of culture was to serve human biological, psychological and social needs
British Functionalism (1920s-1960s) Functionalisms main tenet was that social and cultural features should be explained mainly by their useful functions to the people and to the society. By the benefits they confer on individuals and groups
Critical Thought The idea of studying a cultural “need” is challenging because needs change from culture to culture over time. Consider this: If needs do not take
into account wants, then all societies
have the same needs, which in itself does not explain cultural differences.
The Fieldwork Tradition Malinowski thought the main objective of fieldwork was to see the culture as an insider sees it. Often quoted from his1922 ethnography, The Argonauts of the Western Pacific “[T]he final goal, of which an
North American Anthropologists Leslie White (1940s-1960s) argued that the technologies people use to acquire nature’s resources have improved over the centuries. Over time, the human social and
Anthropological Thought Today The evolutionists compared cultures from all parts of the world and found customs they considered the same among widely scattered peoples.
Scientific Approaches General approaches suggesting that human cultural differences and similarities can be explained in the same sense as biologists explain life and its evolution
Scientific Approaches Interested in questions What are the primary causes of social and cultural differences and similarities? What makes societies and cultures change at different rates? What are the relationships among the major components of a people’s way of life (resource acquisition, family and political organization)?
Materialists Many customs and beliefs of a particular culture can be explained by how they help people live in the natural world. Population growth and intensification are
Humanistic Approach Scholars who adopt the humanistic approach doubt or deny that any general theory can “explain” culture in the same way that evolutionary theory explains life or that Einstein’s relativity theory explains the physical world.
Interpretive Anthropology Contemporary theorists who analyze cultural elements by explicating their meanings to people and understanding them in their local context Generally emphasize cultural