Ch 9 Micro 13th Edition
Ch 9 Micro 13th Edition
Thirteenth Edition
Chapter 9
Long-Run Costs
and Output
Decisions
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter Outline and Learning
Objectives (1 of 2)
9.1 Short-Run Conditions and Long-Run Directions
9.2 Long-Run Costs: Economies and Diseconomies of
Scale.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 9 Long-Run Costs and
Output Decisions
• Output decisions in the long run are less
constrained than in the short run:
– Firms can choose their scale of plant and
change any or all of its inputs.
– Firms are free to enter and leave the industry.
• Managers simultaneously make short-run and
long-run decisions, making the best of the current
constraints while planning for the future.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Short-Run Conditions and Long-Run
Directions
• We begin our discussion of the long run by looking at firms
in 3 short-run circumstances:
– Firms that earn economic profits
– Firms that suffer economic losses but continue
to operate to reduce or minimize those losses
– Firms that decide to shut down and bear losses
just equal to fixed costs
• breaking even The situation in which a firm is
earning exactly a normal rate of return. (P=ATC)
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Maximizing Profits (1 of 2)
Example: The Blue Velvet Car Wash
Table 9.1 Blue Velvet Car Wash Weekly Costs
TFC TVC TVC TC TR
Total Fixed Total Variable Total Variable Cost Total Cost Total Revenue
Cost Cost (800 (800 Washes) (800 Washes) (P = $5)
Washes)
1. Normal $1,000 1. Labor $1,000 TC = TFC + TVC TR = $5 × 800
return to 2. Soap 600 = $2,000 + =$4,000
investors $1,600
= $3,600
2. Other fixed 1,000 $1,600 Profit = TR − TC
costs = $400
(maintenance
contract)
$2,000
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Maximizing Profits (2 of 2)
Graphic Presentation
• A profit-maximizing perfectly competitive firm will produce up to
the point where P * MC.
• Profit is the difference between total revenue and total cost.
• Because average total cost is derived by dividing total cost by q,
we can get back to total cost by multiplying average total cost by
q.
TC
ATC
q
and so
TC ATC q.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.1 Firm Earning a Positive
Profit in the Short Run
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.2 Short-Run Supply Curve of
a Perfectly Competitive Firm
• At prices below average variable cost, it pays a firm to shut down rather than
continue operating.
• Thus, the short-run supply curve of a competitive firm is the part of its marginal
cost curve that lies above its average variable cost curve.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Short-Run Industry Supply Curve
• short-run industry supply curve The sum of the
marginal cost curves (above AVC) of all the firms in an
industry.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.3 The Industry Supply Curve in the Short Run Is
the Horizontal Sum of the Marginal Cost Curves (above
AVC) of All the Firms in an Industry
• If there are only three firms in the industry, the industry supply curve is
simply the sum of all the products supplied by the three firms at each
price.
• For example, at $6 each firm supplies 150 units, for a total industry
supply of 450.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Long-Run Directions: A Review
Table 9.2 Profits, Losses, and Perfectly Competitive
Firm Decisions in the Long and Short Run
Short-Run Short-Run Decision Long-Run
Condition Decision
Profits TR > TC P = MC: operate Expand: new
firms enter
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Long-Run Costs: Economies and
Diseconomies of Scale
• long-run average cost curve (LRAC) Shows the way
per-unit costs change with output in the long run.
1. increasing returns to scale or economies of
scale وفورات الحجمAn increase in a firm’s scale of
production leads to lower costs per unit produced.
2. constant returns to scale An increase in a firm’s
scale of production has no effect on costs per unit
produced.
3. decreasing returns to scale or diseconomies
of scale تبذيراتAn increase in a firm’s scale of
production leads to higher costs per unit produced.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Increasing Returns to Scale
The Sources of Economies of Scale
• Some economies of scale result not from
technology but from 1 (firm-level efficiencies and
2 ) bargaining power that can come with size.
• Economies of scale have come from advantages
of larger firm size rather than gains from plant
size.
• minimum efficient scale (MES) The smallest
size at which the long-run average cost curve is at
its minimum.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.4 A Firm Exhibiting
Economies of Scale
• The long-run average cost curve of a firm shows the different scales on which
the firm can choose to operate in the long run. Each scale of operation defines
a different short run. Here we see a firm exhibiting economies of scale; moving
from scale 1 to scale 3 reduces average cost.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Economics In Practice (1 of 4)
Economies of Scale in the Search Business
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Economics In Practice (2 of 4)
Diseconomies of Scale in Secondary School
Education
The number of school districts in the United
States reduced from 100,000 in the 1940s to
just over 10,000 by the late 1990s.
Schools searched for scale economies by
expanding the number of students with the
same amounts of fixed costs, such as the
costs for a gym or library.
More recently, there was recognition that
larger schools increased bureaucracy, which
increased school costs and potentially
reduces school quality.
CRITICAL THINKING
1. If you were only concerned about the cost side of education, where do you think you
would find the biggest opportunities for cost saving with size?
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
U-Shaped Long-Run Average Costs
• optimal scale of plant The scale
of plant that minimizes long-run
average cost.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.5 A Firm Exhibiting Economies
and Diseconomies of Scale
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.6 Equilibrium for an Industry
with U-Shaped Cost Curves
• The individual firm on the right is producing 2,000 units, and we also know that
the industry consists of 100 firms.
• All firms are identical, and all are producing at the uniquely best output level of
2,000 units.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.7 Industry Response to an
Increase in Demand
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 9.8 New Equilibrium with Higher
Demand
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Short-Run Profits: Moves In and Out
of Equilibrium
• In equilibrium, each firm has:
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Long-Run Adjustment Mechanism:
Investment Flows toward Profit
Opportunities (1 of 2)
• The entry and exit of firms in response to profit
opportunities usually involve the financial capital market.
• In capital markets, people are constantly looking for profits.
When firms in an industry do well, capital is likely to flow
into that industry in a variety of forms.
• long-run competitive equilibrium When
P SRMC SRAC LRAC and profits are zero.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Long-Run Adjustment Mechanism:
Investment Flows toward Profit
Opportunities (2 of 2)
• Investment—in the form of new firms
and expanding old firms—will over time
tend to favor those industries in which
profits are being made.
• Also, over time, industries in which
firms are suffering losses will gradually
contract from disinvestment.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Economics In Practice (4 of 4)
Why Are Hot Dogs So Expensive in Central
Park?
Licenses to sell hot dogs in New York
City’s Central Park are auctioned off for
thousands of dollars, while licenses to
operate in more remote parts of the city
cost only about $1,000.
CRITICAL THINKING
1. Show on a graph how a higher-priced license increases hot dog prices.
2. Who is the woman in the coat?
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Output Markets: A Final Word (1 of 2)
• In the last four chapters, we have been building a model of
a simple market system under the assumption of perfect
competition.
• Changes in market price and thus profits are the basic
signal that leads to a reallocation of society’s resources.
• In the short run, producers are constrained by their scales
of operation.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Output Markets: A Final Word (2 of 2)
• In the long run, however, we would expect to see
resources flow in to compete for these profits. What starts
as a shift in preferences thus ends up as a shift in
resources.
• You have now seen what lies behind the demand curves
and supply curves in competitive output markets.
• The next two chapters complete the picture by taking up
competitive input markets.
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Review Terms and Concepts
• breaking even • optimal scale of plant
(LRAC)
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chapter 9 Appendix: External Economies
and Diseconomies
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Table 9A.1 Construction of New Housing
and Construction Materials Costs, 2000–
2005
Year House Prices Housing Starts Housing Construction Consumer
% over the (Thousands) Starts % Materials Prices %
Previous Year Change Prices % Change over
over the Change over the Previous
Previous the Previous Year
Year Year
2000 - 1,573 - - -
2001 7.5 1,661 5.6% 0% 2.8%
2002 7.5 1,710 2.9% 1.5% 1.5%
2003 7.9 1,853 8.4% 1.6% 2.3%
2004 12.0 1,949 5.2% 8.3% 2.7%
2005 13.0 2,053 5.3% 5.4% 2.5%
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Long-Run Industry Supply Curve
(2 of 2)
Copyright © 2020, 2016, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved