The document discusses the relationship between perception and individual decision making, outlining factors that influence perception, such as attribution theory and biases in decision making. It contrasts rational decision-making models with bounded rationality and intuition, and highlights the impact of individual differences and organizational constraints on decision processes. Additionally, it addresses ethical decision criteria and presents a three-stage model of creativity.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views
6 Perception and Individual Decision Making
The document discusses the relationship between perception and individual decision making, outlining factors that influence perception, such as attribution theory and biases in decision making. It contrasts rational decision-making models with bounded rationality and intuition, and highlights the impact of individual differences and organizational constraints on decision processes. Additionally, it addresses ethical decision criteria and presents a three-stage model of creativity.
Learning Objectives 1. Explain the factors that influence perception 2. Describe attribution theory 3. Explain the link between perception and decision making 4. Contrast the rational model of decision making with bounded rationality and intuition 5. Explain how individual differences and organizational constraints affect decision making 6. Contrast the three ethical decision criteria 7. Describe the three-stage model of creativity
Unit 6.1 Explain the Factors That Influence Perception Perception is a process by which individuals organize and interpret their sensory impressions to give meaning to their environment. It is important to the study of OB because people’s behaviors are based on their perception of what reality is, not on reality itself.
Unit 6.2 Explain Attribution Theory (1 of 7) Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual’s behavior, we attempt to determine whether it was internally or externally caused. Determination depends on three factors: Distinctiveness Consensus Consistency
Explain Attribution Theory (3 of 7) Fundamental attribution error We have a tendency to underestimate the influence of external factors and overestimate the influence of internal or personal factors. Self-serving bias Individuals attribute their own successes to internal factors.
Explain Attribution Theory (4 of 7) Common Shortcuts in Judging Others Selective perception Any characteristic that makes a person, object, or event stand out will increase the probability that it will be perceived. Since we can’t observe everything going on around us, we engage in selective perception.
Explain Attribution Theory (5 of 7) Halo effect The halo effect occurs when we draw a general impression based on a single characteristic. Contrast effects We do not evaluate a person in isolation. Our reaction to one person is influenced by other persons we have recently encountered.
Explain Attribution Theory (6 of 7) Stereotyping Judging someone based on one’s perception of the group to which that person belongs. We have to monitor ourselves to make sure we’re not unfairly applying a stereotype in our evaluations and decisions.
Explain Attribution Theory (7 of 7) Performance Expectations Evidence demonstrates that people will attempt to validate their perceptions of reality, even when those perceptions are faulty. Self-fulfilling prophecy, or the Pygmalion effect, characterizes the fact that people’s expectations determine their behavior. Expectations become reality.
Unit 6.3 Explain the Link Between Perception and Decision Making Individuals make decisions – choosing from two or more alternatives. Decision making occurs as a reaction to a problem. There is a discrepancy between some current state of affairs and some desired state, requiring consideration of alternative courses of action. One person’s problem is another’s satisfactory state of affairs.
1. Define the problem 2. Identify the decision criteria 3. Allocate weights to the criteria 4. Develop the alternatives 5. Evaluate the alternatives 6. Select the best alternative
6.4 Rational Model of Decision Making vs. Bounded Rationality and Intuition (1 of 6) Bounded Rationality Most people respond to a complex problem by reducing it to a level at which it can be readily understood. People satisfice – they seek solutions that are satisfactory and sufficient. Individuals operate within the confines of bounded rationality. They construct simplified models that extract the essential features.
Rational Model of Decision Making vs. Bounded Rationality and Intuition (2 of 6) Intuition Intuitive decision making occurs outside conscious thought; it relies on holistic associations, or links between disparate pieces of information, is fast, and is affectively charged, meaning it usually engages the emotions. The key is neither to abandon nor rely solely on intuition, but to supplement it with evidence and good judgment.
Rational Model of Decision Making vs. Bounded Rationality and Intuition (3 of 6) Common Biases and Errors in Decision Making Overconfidence Bias: individuals whose intellectual and interpersonal abilities are weakest are most likely to overestimate their performance and ability. Anchoring Bias: fixating on initial information as a starting point and failing to adequately adjust for subsequent information.
Rational Model of Decision Making vs. Bounded Rationality and Intuition (4 of 6) Confirmation Bias: type of selective perception. Seek out information that reaffirms past choices, and discount information that contradicts past judgments. Availability Bias: tendency for people to base judgments on information that is readily available.
Rational Model of Decision Making vs. Bounded Rationality and Intuition (5 of 6) Escalation of Commitment: staying with a decision even when there is clear evidence that it’s wrong. Likely to occur when individuals view themselves as responsible for the outcome. Randomness Error: our tendency to believe we can predict the outcome of random events. Decision making becomes impaired when we try to create meaning out of random events.
Rational Model of Decision Making vs. Bounded Rationality and Intuition (6 of 6) Risk Aversion: the tendency to prefer a sure thing instead of a risky outcome. Ambitious people with power that can be taken away appear to be especially risk averse. People will more likely engage in risk-seeking behavior for negative outcomes, and risk-averse behavior for positive outcomes, when under stress. Hindsight Bias: the tendency to believe falsely that one has accurately predicted the outcome of an event, after that outcome is actually known.
Individual Differences, Organizational Constraints, and Decision Making (2 of 2) Organizational Constraints Performance Evaluation Systems Reward Systems Formal Regulations System-Imposed Time Constraints Historical Precedents
6.6 Contrast Ethical Decision Criteria (1 of 2) Utilitarianism: decisions are made solely on the basis of their outcomes or consequences. Focus on rights: calls on individuals to make decisions consistent with fundamental liberties and privileges as set forth in documents such as the Bill of Rights. Protects whistle-blowers. Impose and enforce rules fairly and impartially to ensure justice or an equitable distribution of benefits and costs.
Contrast Ethical Decision Criteria (2 of 2) Behavioral ethics: an area of study that analyzes how people behave when confronted with ethical dilemmas. Individuals do not always follow ethical standards promulgated by their organizations, and we sometimes violate our own standards. There are ways to increase ethical decision making in organizations. Consider cultural differences.
The Three-Stage Model of Creativity (1 of 2) Creativity is the ability to produce novel and useful ideas. These are ideas that are different from what has been done before, but that are also appropriate to the problem.