The document discusses the challenges and limitations in Social Impact Assessments (SIAs), highlighting issues such as the prioritization of societal over personal aspects, insufficient analysis of gathered information, and inadequate coverage of indirect social impacts. It also notes the limited integration of different sections within SIAs and the lack of staff familiarity with specific social contexts. To address these challenges, the document suggests a transition towards more rigorous standards for the social component of SIAs, emphasizing improved data gathering and analysis.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views7 pages
SST 707 History of Social Standards in Nigeria
The document discusses the challenges and limitations in Social Impact Assessments (SIAs), highlighting issues such as the prioritization of societal over personal aspects, insufficient analysis of gathered information, and inadequate coverage of indirect social impacts. It also notes the limited integration of different sections within SIAs and the lack of staff familiarity with specific social contexts. To address these challenges, the document suggests a transition towards more rigorous standards for the social component of SIAs, emphasizing improved data gathering and analysis.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7
CHALLENGES AND LIMITATION
IN SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
One key tool in this process is the SOCIAL Impact Assessment (SIA). SIAs are carried out whenever a project has the potential to produce negative social impacts. These are made available to the communities that might be affected, and to society at large, as part of the Bank’s transparency and due diligence process 1) A tendency to prioritize societal issues over aspects of personal aspect. Tradition and legal requirements have created a system where the treatment of a project’s personal aspects is minimal compared with that of its societal aspects. This happens even in cases where a project’s social elements are much more important and complex. 2) Insufficient level of analysis of the information gathered by studies. Most of the SIAs’ social- related information is limited to purely descriptive input without any serious effort to analyze its significance or determine its relevance for the specific projects to which it pertains. 3 3) Inadequate coverage of indirect social impacts. Investment projects usually have both direct and indirect social impacts, yet SIAs preparation has shown recurrent deficiencies in the coverage and analysis of indirect social impacts. Examples of such impacts include gentrification in urban areas and displacement of small producers in rural areas, the building of secondary access roads for the informal extraction of natural resources, spread of sexually transmitted illnesses, an increase in domestic violence levels, migratory pattern changes, and intensification of internal conflicts in rural communities. 4 4) Limited integration of the SIAs’ different sections. The structure of these studies is typically segmented, making it hard to find the connections between their different sections. Additionally, the correlation between created impacts and required mitigation steps is often unclear, reducing the potential of those steps to tackle the real problems present in a given project setting. 5 5) Lack of familiarization of the permanent staff with specific social contexts. Consulting firms’ permanent staff involved in SIAs preparation are usually assigned to a variety of projects in many different places, which leads them to gain only a superficial understanding of a project’s social context. Yet, there are some issues such as the analysis of possible impact on indigenous communities, or the intensification of gender violence, which require deep knowledge of the socio-cultural context in order to conduct an adequate analysis of a project’s social impacts. 6 A key element necessary to effectively tackle these challenges is a transition towards more rigorous standards for the social component of SIAs, placing greater care on data gathering and social 7