02_12_25
02_12_25
Organizational Behavior
Decision Making
Professional Perspectives- Due 2/19
5
Team Orientation – 10 minutes
Describe specific aspects of the most effective team you’ve been a
part of
8
Remember
Tuckman’s
model
Prepping for template 2.1
• Team and Individual Goals: Grade, what you want to learn, is there
something you want to practice doing, etc.
• Team Leadership: Who will make sure that the team is successfully
moving towards a common goal?
• Team Accountability: Shared responsibility of the team to meet goals,
uphold ground rules (tasks and behaviors) and achieve success.
Your Team’s Big Decisions
14
A father and son are in a horrible car crash that kills the dad.
The son is rushed to the hospital; just as he’s about to go under
the knife, the surgeon says, “I can’t operate—that boy is my
son!”
16
Thinking
Fast and
Slow
18
Common Supervisory Decisions
• Employee Selection
• Resumes & Interviews
• Evaluating Performance
• Feedback
• Compensation
• Promotion, firing, etc.
• Allocating Budget
• Distributing Job Assignments
• Handling Conflict and Disagreement
19
Decision-Making Approaches
22
Avoiding
Perception
Errors
• Multiple Raters
• Pre-set criteria
• Same conditions for all
• Structured situational and behavioral
questions
• Gather full info
• Objective info when possible
• Check conclusions to ensure validity
• Slow down!
• Consistent application of process
23
Groupthink
Tendency to avoid a critical evaluation of ideas the group favors.
Abilene Paradox: Describes a group dynamic where the
collective agrees on a path of action that none of the
individual members want to do. Jerry Harvey, the
management expert who identified and named the
phenomenon, calls it a “failure to manage agreement.”
Potential Impacts:
1. People are silenced
2. Lack of innovation and ideas
3. Flaws and defects aren’t fixed
4. Alienation of anyone not in the “in group”
Ways to mitigate groupthink
• Collect anonymous feedback – post its, idea box, survey
• Create smaller groups before coming together to make a
collective decision
• Actively encouraging discussion and feedback
• Assigning a devil’s advocate to challenge any ideas that are
presented
• Asking for feedback (privately or in a group setting) from those
who are often quiet
• Requiring ideas be assessed through a critical, data-driven lens