0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

PPT-1

The document provides an overview of scientific research, including its definition, goals, and various methods of knowing. It discusses the classification of research into basic and applied types, as well as alternative knowledge claims and paradigms such as positivism, constructivism, advocacy, and pragmatism. The text emphasizes the importance of systematic and empirical investigation in contributing to scientific knowledge and problem-solving.

Uploaded by

bilewget2021
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

PPT-1

The document provides an overview of scientific research, including its definition, goals, and various methods of knowing. It discusses the classification of research into basic and applied types, as well as alternative knowledge claims and paradigms such as positivism, constructivism, advocacy, and pragmatism. The text emphasizes the importance of systematic and empirical investigation in contributing to scientific knowledge and problem-solving.

Uploaded by

bilewget2021
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 45

I-Introduction

( Introduction: Understanding Scientific Research)

College of Business and Economics


Bahir Dar University ,2006E.C
OUTLINE
 Concept of Scientific Research
 Source of Knowledge(Methods of Knowing)
 Definition of Scientific Research
 Goals Scientific of Research
 Alternative Knowledge Claims
 Classification of Research
 Research Process
1.1. Concept of Scientific Research
 For any undertakings to be Scientific Research,
it should:

 i) Contribute to a body of science and/or apply


scientific knowledge to solve practical problems

 ii) Follow scientific method =>Scientific methods of


knowing

??? What is scientific method of knowing???


??? What are Other methods of knowing???
1.1.1. Sources of knowledge(Method of
Knowing)
 The major approaches of knowing the world:

 I) The Method of Tenacity- refers to the acceptance of a


belief based on the idea that “we have always known it to
be this way”.

 Truth is true because one believe in it


 Acceptance of beliefs and customs, in which we have been
socialized, as true and then behave with it and
 Stood still in front of contradicting evidences.

 Problems of Method Tenacity => It offers no means for


correcting erroneous ideas.
…cont’d
 II) Credential-Based Knowing: The Method of Authority-
This method of knowing is the acceptance of new idea or information
stated by the authority figure(someone who is supposed to have the
knowledge-experts of the phenomena)

 With the method of authority, we defer to experts when looking for


accurate assertions about the world.
 Truth is true because an authority says so
 In trusting experts, we are deferring to their credentials and training. We
accept as accurate and true that which experts tell us.
 Problems of Method of Authority- the authority based knowing can
be incorrect => Hence, it is important to examine the basis of the
authority’s claims.
 Frequently our trust in experts is misplaced. Credentials don't always give experts the
corner on truth.
 Note too that authorities, however credentialed they are, can sometimes intentionally
mislead us. Experts can distort information when it is in their vested interest to do so.
…cont’d
 III) The Method of Intuition – This method of knowing can
be thought as “the direct access” of knowledge

 It refers to the way of knowing that operate on “the gut feelings”,


without the use of intellect.

 Problems of Intuition- Intuition, because it operates


outside the realm of intellect and reason, is often hard
to understand
…cont’d
 IV) The Method of Common Sense-This
Sense method of knowing
appeals to direct experience.
 This view is also called empiricism (i.e., knowledge comes our day-to-day
practical experiences ).

 It is based on our own past experiences and our perceptions of the world.

 Problems of Common sense:


 i)Our experiences and perceptions of the world may be quite limited;

Because personal experience is tied to the individual and unique circumstances, it is not the
best basis for generalized knowledge.
 ii)it may also prevent us from understanding new ideas.
…cont’d
 V) The Method of Science: Science is a systematic and
organized body of knowledge in any area of inquiry that is
acquired through the scientific method.

 Scientific method relies on a mixture of empiricism (i.e., the


collection of data) and rationalism (i.e., the use of reasoning and,
theory construction and testing).

 The scientific method of knowing is the scientific


research
1.1.2 Definition of Scientific
Research
 Scientific Research is defined as the systematic , controlled,
empirical, and critical investigation of natural or social
phenomena(using commonly accepted methodology) that either:
 Is guided by theory and hypotheses about the presumed(true)

relations among such phenomena(Deductive Reasoning) , or


 Results in theory and propositions about the possible(true)
relations among such phenomena(Inductive Reasoning)

Systematic-- so ordered, planned and disciplined;

Controlled-the researcher can have confidence in his/her research outcomes;

Empirical-putting beliefs, ideas, or assumptions to a test

Critical-many truths are tentative and are subject to change as a result of subsequent
research.
…cont’d
 Given the definition of scientific method of knowing(scientific research) ,
its main characteristics include:

 In scientific method, we arrive at scientific knowledge(Laws+ Theories) through


a process of logic(theory) and evidence(observation).


Theories provide meaning and significance to what we observe, and
observations help to validate or refine existing theory or construct new
theory.

 It is characterized by carefully designed procedures; and hence,



Strives to be objective and logical, applying every possible test to validate
the procedures employed, the data collected, and the conclusion reached

 As theories and observations are the two pillars of science, scientific research
also operates at two levels: a theoretical level and an empirical level.

Hence, the strategies of inquires may take two forms: the inductive method
and the deductive method.
…cont’d
 The confirmatory or deductive method- is a top-down or
theory/hypothesis testing approach to research.
 It is used by most quantitative researchers involving the f/g three
steps:


1)State the hypothesis (based on theory or research
literature) .


2)Collect data to test the hypothesis.


3) Make a decision to tentatively accept or reject the
hypothesis.
…cont’d
 The exploratory or inductive method- is a bottom-up or theory
generation approach to research.

 It is used by many qualitative researchers involving the f/g three


steps:

 1) Observed the world


 2)Search for a pattern in what is observed
 3)Make a generalization or conclusion about what is occurring

 Virtually any application of science includes the use of both the


deductive & inductive approaches to the scientific method either
in a single study or over time, as in Figure 1.1.
Figure 1.1. Research Wheel

Confirmatory/
Deductive

Exploratory/
Inductive
1.2.Goals of Scientific of Research
 The broad goal of scientific research is problem solving that could
be:

 Theoretical in nature- The primary goal of research is to


acquire and expand the frontiers of knowledge.
 Seek Reality or Truth(Knowledge)

Science is the pursuit of truth, of explanation , prediction and control
of a phenomena

Truth obtained from the scientific method contains both logic and
evidence that are consistent with each other

Science is systematically acquired knowledge that is verifiable

Autonomy of inquiry- Pursuit of science is not accountable to any one
but the scientific community

 Practical in nature- Researchers attempt to reduce the


complexity of problems, and improve the way we live.
1.3Alternative Knowledge claims/ Paradigms
 Knowledge claims/paradigms/ are assumptions researchers make on how they will
learn and what they will learn during their inquiry.
 Paradigm determines how you view the world

 Practices that make up a paradigm


 Ontology: what we think is knowable or exists – the fundamental nature of reality
 Epistemology: The theory of knowledge; how we think we know about things
 Methodology: Procedures for making knowledge valid and authoritative; How do we gain
knowledge about the world? Theory of method

 Four school of thought


 Positivist(Post positivist)
 Consttructism
 Advocacy/participatory
 pragmatist
Meaning of words
 Ontology is the study of the nature of being,
becoming, existence, or reality, as well as the basic
categories of being and their relations. Traditionally
listed as a ...
 Epistemology: Epistemology is the branch of philosophy
concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge and is also
referred to as "theory of knowledge". It questions what ...
 Methodology: Methodology is the systematic, theoretical
analysis of the methods applied to a field of study. It
comprises the theoretical analysis of the body of methods and
...
Meaning of school thoguht
 1 Positivist ;- Positivism is the philosophy of science that information
derived from logical and mathematical treatments and reports of
sensory experience is the exclusive source of
 2 Constructivism is a theory of knowledge (epistemology that
argues that humans generate knowledge and meaning from an
interaction between their experiences and their ...
 3 Advocacy: the act or process of advocating or supporting a
cause or proposal See advocacy defined for English-language learner
 4 Pragmatist a person who is oriented toward the success or
failure of a particular line of action, thought, etc.; a practical person
Positivist(Post Positivism)
Aim of Reflects a deterministic philosophy in which causes probably
research determines outcome
To Find generalities and regularities; To Find causal laws of human
behaviour
Ontology: External, objective and independent of social actors
Reality =>Truth is out there, knowledge develops in a cumulative process of
discovering such truth.
=>Reality exists that is independent of human thoughts and beliefs
Epistemology: Only observable phenomena can provide credible data, facts
Knowledge, (Empirical). Focus on causality and law like generalisations
reality & truth Reducing phenomena to simplest elements(Reductionism)
Researcher is objective analyst, collect data in a value-free way,
The researcher is detached, neutral observer
Mostly deductive reasoning
An individual begins with a theory, collects data that either support or
refutes the theory and makes necessary revisions before additional tests
are conducted
Methodology: Quantitative (abstract ideas linked to precise measurement)
Surveys; Experimental
Hypothesis testing
Descriptive and analytical (usually descriptive and inferential statistics)
Should be replicable
Constructivism/Interpretivism
Aim of Hold that individuals seek understanding of the world in which they live and
research work.
They develop subjective meanings of their experiences
These meanings are varied and multiple, leading the researcher to look for
complexity of views rather than narrowing meanings into few ideas.
Move away from abstract explanation to everyday lived experience
Understanding of social life; How people construct meaning; Experiences of daily
life
Ontology: Multiple subjective realities which are constructed and interpreted.
Reality Constructed through human interactions.

Epistemology: Events understood through interpretation, influenced by interactions with social


Knowledge, context.
reality & Often the subjective meanings are negotiated socially and historically. In other words,
truth they are formed through interaction with others (hence social constructivism)
Empathic observer
Researchers recognize that their own background shapes their interpretation
Analysing details of meaning and seeking connections
Inductive reasoning
Rather than starting with a theory (as a positivist) inquirers generate or inductively
develop a theory
Methodology: Mostly qualitative;
The process of qualitative research is inductive in nature.
Interactional: interviews; focus group discussions; ethnography
Text based: archives; media etc. Phenomenological analysis.
Advocacy/Participatory(or Emancipatory)
Aim of Holds that research inquiry need to be intertwined with politics and
research political agenda.
Research should contain an action agenda for reform that aim for social
justice and emancipation
Specific issues to be addressed include empowerment, inequality,
oppression, domination, suppression, alienation.
Going beyond surface illusions to uncover structures in the material world
that disempower people.
Aim is not simply to understand but to change the social world
Ontology: Reality shaped by historical, social, political, economic values, persons in
Reality society, power
Epistemology: Understand events in social and economic context.
Knowledge, Emphasis on ideological critique and praxis.
reality & Findings are value mediated & socially constructed=> Value Laden
truth Deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning (repeated reevaluations of
ideas and data based on applying alternative rules or schemes)
Methodology: The research assume that the inquirer will proceed collaboratively so as to
not further marginalize the participants.
Participants may help design questions, collect data, analyze information,
receive rewards for participating in the change.
Argumentative and controversial
Discourse analysis;Critical action research
Feminism
Pragmatism
Aim of It arises out of actions, situations and consequences rather than
research antecedent conditions (as a positivist)
There is a concern with applications—what works—and solutions to
problems (Patton, 1990).
Ontology: Pragmatists are not committed to any one system of philosophy or
Reality reality
External, multiple, view chosen to best enable answering of research
question
Epistemology: Either or both observable phenomena and subjective meanings can
Knowledge, provide acceptable knowledge dependent upon the research question.
reality & truth Focus on practical applied research, integrating different perspectives
to help interpret the data
Values play a large role in interpreting results, the researcher adopting
both objective and subjective points of view
Methodology: Instead of methods being important, the problem is the most important
and researchers use all approaches to understand the problem
Apply mixed or multiple method designs, quantitative and qualitative
Four knowledge claims/Paradigms/
1.4. Classification of
Research
 Commonly, Research can be classified based on:

 Goals of Research

 Specific Objectives of Research

 Approaches of Research
…cont’d
 I) Classification Research Based on Goals of
Research

 The goal of research is problem solving that could be-


theoretical or practical

 These two types of problems that the research tries to


solve leads to two broad classifications of research:

 Basic research, and

 Applied research.
…cont’d
 Basic/Fundamental/Pure Research- aim is to develop a
body of knowledge for the understanding of a phenomenon
by means of a combination of empirical enquiry and application
of theory. Specifically, its aims to:

 obtain and use empirical data to formulate, expand, or evaluate


theory; and
 discovery of knowledge solely for the sake of knowledge.

 The driving force in basic research is a researcher’s interest in


a scientific question => to expand human knowledge,
not for its practical significance.

 Undertaken by academics and its consumers are the academic


…cont’d
 In general, basic research:•

 Represents a rigorous and structured type of analysis;

 Employs careful sampling procedures in order to extend the


findings beyond the group or situation; and

 Has little concern for the application or social usefulness of the


findings .
…cont’d
 Applied Research- aim is to solve practical problems of the
modern world, rather than to acquire knowledge for knowledge's
sake.

 Specifically, applied research aims to:

 Improve understanding of particular practical problem


 Results in solution to problem
 New Knowledge limited to problem

 Its objectives negotiated with originator/sponsor

 Conducted by practitioner and/or applied researchers employed


by sponsors.
…cont’d
 In general, Applied research:

 Is conducted in relation to actual problems and under the


conditions in which they are found in practice;

 Employs methodology that is not as rigorous as that of basic


research;

 Yields findings that can be evaluated in terms of local


applicability and not in terms of universal validity
…cont’d
 II) Classification Research Based on Specific
Objective of Research

 Based on the specific objectives, research can be classified


as:

 Exploratory

 Descriptive, or

 Explanatory research.
…cont’d
 Exploratory Research- is often conducted in new areas of
inquiry, where the objectives of the research are:

 (1) to scope out the magnitude or extent of a particular


phenomenon, problem, or behavior,

 (2) to generate some initial ideas about that phenomenon, or

 (3) to test the feasibility of undertaking a more extensive study


regarding that phenomenon.
 Exploratory research is defined as the initial research into a
hypothetical or theoretical idea
 It involves a variety of research methods to achieve its objectives:
• Informal/formal in depth interview• focus group discussion•
Case studies
…cont’d
 Descriptive Research- is directed at making careful
observations and detailed documentation of a phenomenon of
interest.

 The objective is to describe some aspect of a phenomenon,


i.e., the status of a given phenomenon.

 It can help understand a topic and lead to causal analysis.

 It involves a variety of research methods to achieve its


objectives: • Surveys • Correlation studies • Observation
studies• Case studies

…cont’d
Explanatory Research - seeks explanations of observed
phenomena, problems, or behaviors.

 seeks answers to why and how types of questions


 attempts to connect the dots in research, by identifying causal
factors and outcomes of the target phenomenon
 Explanatory research is defined as an attempt to connect ideas
to understand cause and effect,
 Explanatory research involves:

 Explaining things not just reporting. Why? Elaborating and enriching


a theory's explanation.
 Determining which of several explanations is best.
 Determining the accuracy of the theory; test a theory's predictions .
 Providing evidence to support or refute an explanation or
prediction.
…cont’d
 III)Classification of Research based on Approach
Employed

 Based on the approaches to be employed in conducting


research, research can be classified as

 Qualitative research

 Quantitative research and

 Mixed Research
Features Qualitative Research
Objectives Interest is to look for meaning . The socially
constructed nature of reality.
Sample Entails purposive sampling for gathering
data. Usually, a small # of non representative
cases. Respondents selected to fulfill a given
quota. Information maximization guides the
selection of respondent
Data In the form of words, picture or objects
Data collection Unstructured or semi structured techniques
Methods e.g. In-depth interviews, group discussions, and
observations
Method of Data No statistical tests are used. It is formulated
analysis during or parallel to data collection .
Mode of inquiry Primarily inductive process used to formulate
theory
Outcome Exploratory and/or investigative. Findings are
not conclusive and not generalizable to the
population of interest
Researcher Role Personal involvement & partiality. Emphatic
Features Quantitative Research
Objectives To quantify data and generalize results from a
sample to population of interest
Sample Entails random sampling for gathering data.
Usually, a large # of cases representing the
population of interest Respondents selected
randomly
Data In the form of numbers and statistics
Data collection Structured techniques e.g. survey questioner
Methods and experiments
Method of Data Statistical methods are frequently used . It is
analysis formulated after data collection . It may take the
forms of cross tabulations, correlation analysis and
tests of significance on numerical data
Mode of inquiry Primarily deductive process used to test the pre
specified concepts, constructs and hypotheses that
make up a theory
Outcome Findings are conclusive and more generalizable
to the population of interest
Researcher Role Detachment & Impartiality. Objective portrayal.
Features Mixed Research
What??? & It is the type of research in which a researcher combines
Why?? elements of qualitative and quantitative research
approaches for purposes of :

- breadth and depth of understanding and corroboration.


- to expand an understanding from one method to
another, to converge or confirm findings from different
data sources
Core
Characteristics -Collects and analyzes persuasively and rigorously both
qualitative and quantitative data (based on research question)

-Mixes (or integrates) the two forms of data concurrently by


combining them (or merging them), or sequentially by having
one build on the other,

-Gives priority to one or to both forms of data (in terms of what


the research emphasizes)

Sample Data, - Use of both qualitative and quantitative viewpoints on data type,
Method of sampling, data collection, analysis, inference techniques
Data analysis
Features ……..Contd……Mixed Research
Mode of Sequential mixed-methods research in the form of:
inquiries
-Sequential Exploratory- qualitative data collection and
analysis is undertaken first, and then, quantitative data
collection and analysis

-Sequential Explanatory-quantitative data collection and


analysis is undertaken first, and then qualitative data collection
and analysis

 Concurrent Strategies of Mixed method, in the form of:

-Concurrent Triangulation- involve data collection using


both quantitative and qualitative approaches simultaneously,
with the possible equal priority, for triangulation.

- Concurrent Nested or Embedded- Unlike the concurrent


triangulation model, a nested approach has a predominant method
that guides the research

-Given less priority, the method (quantitative or qualitative) is


embedded, or nested, within the predominant method
(qualitative or quantitative).

-This nesting may mean that the embedded method addresses


1.5. Research Process
 Research process- represents a series of activities to be
performed in research, categorized into three phases ,as in
Figure 1.2:

 Exploration,

 Research design, and

 Research execution.
Research Literature
EXPLORATION Theory
Question Review

Operationaliz Research
RESEARCH DESIGN Sampling
ation Method

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Pilot Testing

RESEARCH EXECECUTION Data Collection

Data Analysis

RESEARCH REPORT
…cont’d
 Exploration – It is the first phase of research is exploration.
This phase includes:

 exploring and selecting research questions for the study,

 examining the published literature on the area of interest to


understand the current state of knowledge in that area, and

 identifying theories that may help answer the research


questions of interest..
…cont’d
 Research Design- The next major in the research
process is research design.

 This is a blueprint for fulfilling the research objectives and


answering the research questions.

 This phase includes:

 Selecting a research method,


 Operationalizing constructs of interest, and
 Devising an appropriate sampling strategy.
…cont’d
 Research Proposal- At this stage, it is often a good idea to
write a research proposal detailing all of the decisions made in
the preceding stages of the research process and the rationale
behind each decision

 This multi-part proposal should address:

 What research questions you wish to study and why, the prior
state of knowledge in this area, theories you wish to employ
along with hypotheses to be tested,

 How to measure constructs, what research method to be


employed and why, and desired sampling strategy
…cont’d
 Research Execution-Having decided who to study (subjects),
what to measure (concepts), and how to collect data (research
method), the researcher is now ready to proceed to the
research execution phase.

 This includes-

 Pilot testing the measurement instruments,


 Data collection, and
 Data analysis
…cont’d
 Research Report- The final stage of research involves
preparing the final research report documenting the entire
research process in the form of a research paper, dissertation,
or monograph.

 This report should outline in complete detail

 All the choices made during the research process (e.g., theory
used, constructs selected, measures used, research methods,
sampling, etc.) and why, as well as

 The outcome of each phase of the research process


End !

You might also like