Chapt-4 Research Methodology
Chapt-4 Research Methodology
Research Methodology
Learning Objectives
• With the key research design choices outlined and justified, the next
step is to discuss the limitations of your design. No research design
or methodology is perfect – there will always be trade-offs between
the “ideal” design and what is practical and feasible, given your
constraints. Therefore, this section of your methodology chapter is
where you will discuss the trade-offs you had to make, and why
these were justified given the context.
• It is important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study.
There is no use trying to hide them (your examiner will be aware of
them regardless).
• By being critical, you will demonstrate to your examiner that you
have a strong understanding of research design.
• State the limitations, why these were justified, how
you mitigated their impacts to the best degree possible, and how
your study still provides value despite these limitations.
• Methodological limitations can vary greatly from study to study,
ranging from common issues such as time and budget constraints
to issues of sample or selection bias.
Introduction
Illustrative Example
Let us consider a hypothetical study aimed at understanding the impact of remote work on employee
productivity.
Ideal Research Design
•Research Question: How does remote work affect employee productivity?
Ideal Methodology:
Type of research: A longitudinal study that tracks the same group of employees over several years.
Sample Size: A large, diverse sample of employees from various industries to ensure generalizability.
Data Collection methods: Use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection methods to
gather information from employees and employers.
Data Analysis methods: Use advanced statistical methods to analyze the data, ensuring robust
conclusions.
Trade-offs and Practical Constraints
1. Time and Resources:
• Ideal: A longitudinal study is time-consuming and requires significant resources to track participants
over years.
• Practical: Instead, the researcher opts for a cross-sectional study that surveys employees at one point in
time. This is quicker and less expensive but may miss changes in productivity over time.
2. Sample Size and Diversity:
• Ideal: A large, diverse sample would provide more reliable and generalizable results.
• Practical: Due to budget constraints, the researcher can only survey a small group of employees and
employers from one company.
Introduction
Concluding Summary
Scales of measurement
Variable
Categorical Quantitative/
numerical (Discrete
or Continuous)
14
Introduction
Tips on the types of variables
• Researchers often manipulate or measure independent and
dependent variables in studies to test the cause-and-effect
relationships.
• Researchers who focus on causal relations usually begin with an
effect, and then search for its causes.
Dependent Variable: is a variable that is being tested and
measured in a research work (it is also referred as
response/outcome variable/effect variable).
Independent Variable: As per the name, an independent variable
(IV) stands alone. The value does not change due to the impact of
any other variable. The researcher manipulates or changes the
independent variable to measure its impact on other variables.
o It is what we expect will influence the dependent variable (the
cause variable).
• The independent and dependent variables may be viewed in terms
of cause and effect, respectively. If the independent variable is
changed, then an effect is seen in the dependent
variable. Independent variable is “independent of” prior causes that
act on it, whereas the dependent variable “depends on” the cause.
Introduction
• Moderating Variable: is one that has a strong contingent
effect on the independent variable-dependent variable
relationship (i.e., the presence of a third variable (the
moderating variable) modifies the original relationship between
the independent and the dependent variable.
• A moderating variable (or moderator) affects the strength and
direction of relationship between the two variables.
• A Moderating variable is used to check whether the third
variable influences the strength or direction of the relationship
between an independent and dependent variable.
• An easy way to understand this is that the moderator variable
might change the strength of a relationship from strong
to moderate, to nothing at all. It is almost like a turn dial on the
relationship; as you change values of the moderator, a statistical
relationship that you observed before might dissolve away.
Introduction
For Example,
o A strong relationship has been observed between the quality
of library facilities (X) and the performance of the
students (Y).
o Although this relationship is supposed to be true generally, it
is nevertheless contingent on the interest and inclination of
the students.
o It means that only those students who have the interest and
inclination to use the library will show improved performance
in their studies.
where
Where
Sampling
Methods
Probability Non-
Samples probability
Simple
Cluster Judgment Quota
Random
31
Sampling Techniques
Please note that:
A progress indicator serves as a visual cue that informs respondents about their
advancement within the questionnaire. This feature not only alleviates anxiety
regarding the length of the survey but also encourages completion by providing a
sense of accomplishment as they move through the questions.
By categorizing questions under clear and descriptive headings, researchers can
guide respondents through different sections, making it easier for them to
understand the context of each question. This structured approach minimizes
confusion and helps respondents focus on the specific topic at hand, thereby
improving the quality of the data collected.
Loaded Question: Why do you think our product is the best on the market?
Problem: It assumes the respondent agrees that the product is the best.
Improved Question: How does our product compare to others on the market?
(Options: Much Worse, Worse, About the Same, Better, Much Better)
Questionnaire Design Process
11. Avoid using leading questions.
oPushes the respondent to answer a certain way.
oLeading questions can result in skewed responses that do not truly reflect
the respondent’s opinion.
Examples of Leading Questions and Improvements:
Leading Question: Most people say this product is affordable. Do you agree?
Problem: It biases the respondent by mentioning others' opinions.
Improved Question: How would you rate the affordability of this product?
(Options: Very Expensive, Expensive, Neutral, Affordable, Very Affordable)
12.Avoid using double-barreled questions.
oA question may contain two (or more) variables which require independent
response
oExample: Does your company provide training for new employees and
retraining for existing staff? This example is double-barreled as it asks
two questions rather than one.
13. Avoid vague questions.
ounclear what is being asked or very open-ended (although open-ended
questions are useful for understanding nuance and finer details)
oonly use open-ended questions if they are central to your research
objectives
14. Be careful when using questions that allow respondents to select
multiples choices
15. Avoid sticking only on 1 or 2 response types that you are comfortable
Questionnaire Design Process
16. You need to ensure that your questionnaire produces valid and
reliable data (demonstrate the validity and reliability of your
questionnaire).
o Validity: Does the questionnaire actually measure what you are
trying to measure?
o Reliability: Do questions that are measuring the same construct
get the same response?
o You can often modify existing scales to suit your specific research
needs.
o It is completely acceptable to make use of existing scales in your
research (you can use a “tried & tested” scale).
17. Consider your data analysis methods at the questionnaire design
stage
o Questions should be appropriate for the respondent you have in
mind and data analysis methods.
o Keep your analysis methods in mind when designing each
question in a questionnaire (questions should be meaningful and
quantifiable).
Questionnaire Design Process
o It is a good idea to start with the end (data analysis) when
designing questionnaire
o You should have a clear idea of what statistical methods you
plan to use (think carefully about which descriptive/inferential
methods you will use for each of the constructs)
o If you are not sure about the appropriate methods you will
use, seek out statistical help before launching the your
questionnaire.
18. Make sure you conduct a pilot study to test your survey
questions and responses
o Help purify your questions (you need to make sure that each
question should have a clear focus and a clear point).
o A pilot study will provide you with some data to do preliminary
analysis.
o Use your pilot study data to assess the validity and reliability
o Confirmation for moving forward
Data Collection Methods
• Data collection is the process of gathering and/or measuring
information on variables of interest, in an established systematic
fashion that enables one to answer stated research questions,
test hypotheses, and evaluate outcomes.
• The collection of data that are relevant to the problem being studied
is commonly the most difficult, expensive, and time-consuming
part of the entire research project.
• The data collection component of research is common to all fields of
study including physical and social sciences, humanities, business,
etc.
• While methods vary by discipline, the emphasis on ensuring
accurate and honest collection of data remains the same.
• Regardless of the field of study or preference for defining data
(quantitative, qualitative), accurate data collection is essential to
maintaining the integrity of research.
• The selection of appropriate data collection instruments (existing,
modified, or newly developed) and clearly explained instructions for
their correct use reduce the likelihood of occurrence of errors.
• Some of the consequences from improperly collected data include:
o inability to answer research questions accurately
o distorted findings resulting in wasted resources
Data Collection Methods
There are two sources of data:
Primary data: are collected specifically for the analysis desired
Secondary data: Previously collected by someone else for a different purpose
(have already been compiled and are available for statistical analysis)
1)Personal Interviews: One-to-one, back and forth, discussion between the researcher and
the study participant
• Data collection tools are structured forms with closed-ended questions.
Distribution of questionnaires can be done via: Face-to-face or Telephone.
Face-to-face: This involves trained interviewers visiting the desired people (respondents) in
person to collect data.
o To determine whether workers in a given factory are satisfied with their salary/work or not;
an investigator may contact each worker and ask his/her opinion.
• The advantage of this method is that it ensures a high response rate, and researchers
Data Collection Methods
Telephone: This involves trained interviewers phoning people to collect
data. This method is quicker and less expensive than face-to-face
interviewing.
oTo determine whether a new product is favored by the public or not, a
company may randomly pick telephone numbers from the telephone
directory, call each of these numbers and then ask the preference or
opinion of the respondents.
2) Focus group discussion: Participants interact with the researcher
(trained interviewer) and each other.
oGroup discussions guided by a facilitator to gather collective
perspectives.
oThe participants can be influenced each other.
3) Document Review: The researcher analyzes existing text (for
example: quarterly and annual reports, historical records, …).
oAnalyzing existing texts, images, videos, or physical objects for patterns
or meanings.
• Wider reach: People from all around the world can participate in online
surveys, increasing the sample size and providing a more diverse range of
opinions.
53
Quantitative Data Analysis Methods
Overview of Hypothesis
Testing
Hypothesis testing is a procedure for checking the
validity of a statistical hypothesis.
―It is the process by which we decide whether the null
hypothesis should be rejected or not.
―A value computed from a sample that is used to
determine whether the null hypothesis has to be
rejected or not is called a test statistic.
54
Quantitative Data Analysis Methods
Overview of Hypothesis
Testing
55
Quantitative Data Analysis Methods
Overview of Hypothesis
Testing
•
Quantitative Data Analysis Methods
Parametric tests:
Normally involve data expressed in absolute
numbers (interval or ratio scale) rather than
ranks and categories (nominal or ordinal).
Always assume some distribution about the data
(e.g., a normal distribution).
If assumptions are correct, these tests can
produce more accurate and precise estimates.
Example: t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's
Correlation, Regression, etc.
Quantitative Data Analysis Methods
To make your analysis more efficient, you have to make sure that the
themes you have identified are appropriate and sufficient for the
research objectives.
This will give you an opportunity to ensure that the thematic analysis is
going tin the right direction and you can make final changes in the
theme and criteria as needed.
Qualitative data Analysis Methods
5. Naming and defining the themes
It is an important part of thematic research , as it enables
you to set boundaries and make distinction between data.
It helps in organizing your analysis and ensures that you do
not mix up or get confused between different themes and
data.
6. Writing
After you have identified, named, and defined the themes
carefully, the next step is to write up your report for your
thematic analysis.
Your report should be formal and should include all
sections of a official report, such as introduction,
literature review, methodology, results and
observations, and final conclusion.
Qualitative data Analysis Methods
Content analysis: is a research method that examines and
quantifies the presence of certain words, subjects/themes, and
concepts in text, image, video, or audio messages. The
method transforms qualitative input into quantitative data to help
you make reliable conclusions about topic of study.
The researcher uses objective and systematic counting and recording
procedures to produce a quantitative description of the symbolic
content in a text.
Researchers can quantify and analyze the presence, meanings, and
relationships of certain words, subjects, or concepts.
One of the most common qualitative data analysis method
Content analysis can bring a slight quantitative angle into a
qualitative analysis
NB: While content analysis and thematic analysis seem similar, they are
different in concept:
• Content analysis can be applied to both
qualitative and quantitative data, and focuses on identifying
frequencies and recurring words and subjects.
• Thematic analysis can only be applied to qualitative data, and focuses
on identifying patterns and themes.
Qualitative data Analysis Methods
Narrative analysis: involves the analysis of people’s stories to
derive meaning (i.e., listening to people telling story and
analyzing what that mean).
The revision of primary qualitative data by the researcher.
It provides insight into people’s worldviews and perspectives.
How the story is said is very important.
Validity:
trustworthiness,
credibility,
neutrality,
applicability/transferability