LEADERSHIP & NAVIGATION
LEADERSHIP & NAVIGATION
LEADERSHIP
NAVIGATING THE
ORGANIZATION
INFLUENCING
MOTIVATION THEORIES
THE DEFINITION OF LEADERSHIP & NAVIGATION
FORMAL INFORMAL
• Is a person who is • On the other hand,
acknowledged as the Informal leader are not
chosen by an organization.
group’s official leader
Such as Athletic teams
by those outside the frequently feature
group. unofficial leaders – who
have significant influence
over team members.
HERSEY & BLANCHARD
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
The qualities, attributes and talents required in
Click icon to add pic
a leader are dictated to a significant measure by
the demands of the circumstances in which
individuals are expected to perform as leaders.
01 DIRECTING
02 COACHING
03 SUPPORTING
04 DELEGATING
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
SUPPORTING - HỖ TRỢ:
Supporting is for employees who have become proficient at their
profesions but are still inconsistent and not entirely dedicated. They have
advanced to a higher level of competence but are still unsure of their
abilities or are not entirely devoted to doing their best and excelling.
Leaders must encourge such individuals. While explicit directions or
frequent follow-ups are no longer necessary, leaders must continue to
check in to ensure that tasks are being completed to the required
standards.
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
SUPPORTIVE – HỖ TRỢ:
Employees receive emotional support from supportive bosses. These bosses
treat their employees well, show that they care about them personally, and encourage
them.
When employees are under a lot of stress or have to do monotonous, repetitive jobs,
compassionate leadership is more effective. Supportive leadership may also be more
effective when people know exactly how to perform their responsibilities but find them
disagreeable.
PATH-GOAL LEADERSHIP
PARTICIPATIVE:
Participative leadership is a means of indirectly directing strategic choices for workers
with a high internal locus of control (those who believe they influence their own fate),
which is likely to be valued. When employees have high skill levels and the choices they
make in the workplace are personally important, participate leadership maybe more
successful.
PATH-GOAL LEADERSHIP
Leader who are achievement oriented set goals for their personnel and encourage them
to achieve these goals. Employees are challenged by their leaders manner, which
focuses their minds on work-related goals. When employees have both elevated
amounts of talents and high motivation levels, this method is very likely to be successful.
PATH-GOAL LEADERSHIP
TRANSFORMATIVE VS. TRANSACTIONAL
Consensus participative
01 leadership
Collective participative
02 leadership
Democratic participative
03 leadership
Autocratic participative
04 leadership
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
Stages:
1. Role-Taking:
Role-taking occurs when team members first join the group. Managers
use this time to assess new members' skills and abilities.
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
Stages:
2. Role-Making:
New team members then begin to work on projects and tasks as part of the team. In
this stage, managers generally expect that new team members will work hard, be
loyal and prove trustworthy as they get used to their new role.
The theory says that, during this stage, managers sort new team members (often
subconsciously) into one of two groups:
• In-Group: if team members prove themselves loyal, trustworthy and skilled,
they're put into the In-Group. This group is made up of the team members that the
manager trusts the most. Managers give this group most of their attention,
providing challenging and interesting work, and offering opportunities for
additional training and advancement. This group also gets more one-to-one time
with the manager. Often, people in this group have a similar personality and work-
ethic to their manager.
• Out-Group: if team members betray the trust of the manager, or prove that
they're unmotivated or incompetent, they're put into the Out-Group. This group's
work is often restricted and unchallenging. Out-Group members tend to have less
access to the manager, and often don't receive opportunities for growth or
advancement.
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
Stages:
3. Routinization:
During this last phase, routines between team members and their managers are established.
In-Group team members work hard to maintain the good opinion of their managers, by showing
trust, respect, empathy, patience, and persistence.
Out-Group members may start to dislike or distrust their managers. Because it's so hard to move
out of the Out-Group once the perception has been established, Out-Group members may have to
change departments or organizations in order to "start over."
Once team members have been classified, even subconsciously, as In-Group or Out-Group, that
classification affects how their managers relate to them from then on, and it can become self-
fulfillling.
For instance, In-Group team members are often seen as rising stars and the manager trusts them
to work and perform at a high level. This is also the group that the manager talks to most, offering
support and advice, and they're given the best opportunities to test their skills and grow. So, of
course, they're more likely to develop in their roles.
This also holds true for the Out-Group. The manager spends little, if any, time trying to support and
develop this group. They receive few challenging assignments or opportunities for training and
advancement. And, because they're never tested, they have little chance to change the manager's
opinion
SERVANT LEADERSHIP
Rational Approach
Personal Appeal
Forming
Coalitions
HOW DOES INFLUENCE WORKS
Rational Approach
Personal Appeal
Forming Coalitions
GOAL-SET THEORY
EXPECTANCY THEORY
ATTRIBUTION THEORY
SELF-DERTERMINATON THEORY
GOAL – SET THEORY EDWINK
• According to goal-set theory, people will perform much better
LOCKER
at work if they have demanding, defined, and agreed-upon
performance goals or targets.
• Goal-set theory’s first and most basic tenet is that people try to
Click icon to add pict
achieve the objectives they set for themselves. People who
have goals are more driven. Because they are personally
invested, their motivation is more intense and they have a
more focused approach.
• The second fundamental principle of goal-set theory is that
challenge goals produce greater results than easy goals. This is
not to say that challenge goals are always accomplished, but
• people
In addition
tendto torecognize
do better awhen
goal,they
goal-set theory
set out suggests
to do that
something
people. must also adhere to that goal. The degree to which
harder
people devote themselves to achieving a goal is referred to as
goal commitment. Setting priorities is an important part of goal
commitment.
• When people are permitted to engage the goal-setting process,
they are more likely to stick to their goals. This relates to the
concept of ownership. People who participate in the process
are more likely to include characteristics that they believe will
make the goal more intriguing, challenging, and reachable. As
a result, it is a good idea to include people in the goal-setting
process. This is because when you impose (áp đặt) goals on
people from outside, you usually get less commitment.
EDWINK
EXPECTANCY THEORY LOCKER
Expectancy theory argues that people
choose the more appealing goal when
presented with two or more options.
Furthermore, the more appealing the
chosen alternative is, the more motivated
people will be to pursue it. People are
motivated to maximize desirable results
( a boost in salary) while minimizing
undesirable consequences ( a pay cut).