This report analyzes the Shell/Solid Based Surface Model for plastic injection molding of a polypropylene component, focusing on FLOW, PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. Key findings include optimal filling times, acceptable temperature distributions, and safe clamping forces, while noting the lack of data for PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. The results suggest areas for further investigation to enhance the manufacturing process and product quality.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views
Default Report (1)
This report analyzes the Shell/Solid Based Surface Model for plastic injection molding of a polypropylene component, focusing on FLOW, PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. Key findings include optimal filling times, acceptable temperature distributions, and safe clamping forces, while noting the lack of data for PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. The results suggest areas for further investigation to enhance the manufacturing process and product quality.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 53
Report
Shell/ Solid Based Surface Model
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold Content
1.Introduction 4.Special Note
2.Information 5.Figures Model Material Parameter Material Result Process Condition FLOW 3.Summary PACK COOL FLOW Result WARP PACK Result User-Defined COOL Result WARP Result
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 1. Introduction Title : TP2 Date : 24/04/2025 Department : genie mecanique Institute : ENIM Author : Boughdiri Mayssa
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 1. Introduction This report presents a comprehensive analysis of the Shell/Solid Based Surface Model, focusing on the simulation results of the injection molding process for a polypropylene (PP) component. The study includes detailed evaluations of the FLOW, PACK, COOL, and WARP stages, along with material properties and process conditions. Key parameters such as filling time, clamping forces, temperature distributions, and shear stress are analyzed to assess the manufacturability and quality of the final product. The report also highlights critical figures, including polymer viscosity graphs and flow front animations, to provide a visual understanding of the process dynamics.
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 2. Information Information : Model Name: Default Type: Shell Volume: 18.88 (cm3) Mass: 17.29 (G) Size: X: 167.00 (mm) Y: 78.00 (mm) Z: 4.00 (mm)
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 2. Information Information : Model
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 2. Information Information : Material Material Name = PP Product Name = Generic material / Generic PP Melt Temperature = 230.00 °C Mold Temperature = 50.00 °C Ejection Temperature = 95.00 °C Transition Temperature = 135.00 °C Specific Heat = 1 3.100000e+07 Thermal Conductivity = 1 1.500000e+04 Young Modulus = 2 1.350000e+10 1.350000e+10 Poisson's Ratio = 2 4.000000e-01 4.000000e-01 WLF Parameters = 1 4.821429e+09 WLF Parameters = -1 WLF Parameters = 1 SIMPOE WLF Parameters = -1 Please enter a number. = -1
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 2. Information Information : Process Condition FLOW/PACK Filling Time = 4.671 sec Main Material Melt Temperature = 230 °C Mold Wall Temperature = 50 °C Injection Pressure Limit = 100 MPa Flow Rate Limit = 400 cc/s Fill/Pack Switch Point (% Filled Volume) = 100 % Pressure Holding Time = 6.58 sec Total Time in Pack Stage = 46.709 sec Auto Filling Time (1: Yes, 0: No) = 1 Auto Packing Time (1: Yes, 0: No) = 1 Venting Analysis (1: Yes, 0: No) = 0 Cavity Initial Air Pressure = 0.101 MPa Cavity Initial Air Temperature = 30 °C Temperature Criteria for Short Shots (1: Yes, 0: No) = 1 Temperature Criteria for Short Shots = 135 °C Clamp Force Limit = 100 Tonne 2nd Material Injection Pressure Limit = 100 MPa 2nd Material Injection Flow Rate Limit = 194 cc/s 2nd Material Fill/Pack Switch Point (% Filled Volume) = 100 % 2nd Material Pressure Holding Time = 10 sec 2nd Material TotalA Time in Pack Professional Stageof =Plastic CAE Package 20 Injection sec Mold 2. Information Information : Process Condition COOL Melt Temperature = 230 °C Min. Coolant Temperature = 25 °C Air Temperature = 30 °C Mold Open Time = 5 sec Average Coolant Flow Rate = 150 cc/s Control type(1:Eject temp., 2:Cooling time) = 1 Eject Temperature (if control type is "1") = 90 °C Cooling Time (if control type is "2") = 12 sec
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 2. Information Information : Process Condition WARP Ambient Temperature = 30 °C
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 3. Summary FLOW Result X-dir. Clamping Force= 0.0600 Tonne Y-dir. Clamping Force= 0.3000 Tonne Z-dir. Clamping Force= 1.0800 Tonne Required injection pressure= 15.1900 Mpa Max. central temperature= 230.6100 °C Max. average temperature= 215.0100 °C Max. bulk temperature= 231.6400 °C Max. shear stress= 0.1500 Mpa Max. shear rate= 10805.8000 1/sec Averaged perfect cooling time= 59.9000 sec CPU Time= 19.92 sec Cycle Time = 1237.36 sec |- 1. Filling Time = 4.63 sec |- 2. Cooling Time = 1227.72 sec |- 3. Mold Open Time = 5.00 sec
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 3. Summary PACK Result No data.
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 3. Summary COOL Result No data.
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 3. Summary WARP Result No data.
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 4. Special Note
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Viscosity Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Specific-Volume Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Specific-Heat Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Thermal-Conductivity Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Elastic-Modulus Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Poisson-Ratio Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Linear-Thermal-Expansion-Coefficient Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Material Parameter Polymer Relaxation-Modulus Graph
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Result Max. Inlet Pressure
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Result Melt Front Flow Rate
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Result X-dir. Clamping Force
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Result Y-dir. Clamping Force
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : Result Z-dir. Clamping Force
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : FLOW Air Traps
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : PACK No Data
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : COOL No Data
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : WARP No Data
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold 5. Figures Figures : User-Defined No Data
A Professional CAE Package
of Plastic Injection Mold CONCLUSION • The simulation results demonstrate that the injection molding process for the PP component is feasible under the specified conditions. The FLOW stage analysis reveals optimal filling times and acceptable temperature distributions, while the clamping forces remain within safe limits. However, the absence of data for the PACK, COOL, and WARP stages suggests potential areas for further investigation. Overall, the findings provide valuable insights for optimizing the manufacturing process, ensuring product quality, and minimizing defects. Future work could include refining the cooling strategy and validating the warp predictions to enhance the model's accuracy.