0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Default Report (1)

This report analyzes the Shell/Solid Based Surface Model for plastic injection molding of a polypropylene component, focusing on FLOW, PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. Key findings include optimal filling times, acceptable temperature distributions, and safe clamping forces, while noting the lack of data for PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. The results suggest areas for further investigation to enhance the manufacturing process and product quality.

Uploaded by

mayssahazard
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Default Report (1)

This report analyzes the Shell/Solid Based Surface Model for plastic injection molding of a polypropylene component, focusing on FLOW, PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. Key findings include optimal filling times, acceptable temperature distributions, and safe clamping forces, while noting the lack of data for PACK, COOL, and WARP stages. The results suggest areas for further investigation to enhance the manufacturing process and product quality.

Uploaded by

mayssahazard
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 53

Report

Shell/ Solid Based Surface Model

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
Content

1.Introduction 4.Special Note


2.Information 5.Figures
 Model  Material Parameter
 Material  Result
 Process Condition  FLOW
3.Summary  PACK
  COOL
FLOW Result
  WARP
PACK Result
  User-Defined
COOL Result
 WARP Result

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
1. Introduction
Title : TP2
Date : 24/04/2025
Department : genie mecanique
Institute : ENIM
Author : Boughdiri Mayssa

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
1. Introduction
This report presents a comprehensive analysis of the Shell/Solid Based Surface Model,
focusing on the simulation results of the injection molding process for a polypropylene (PP)
component. The study includes detailed evaluations of the FLOW, PACK, COOL, and WARP
stages, along with material properties and process conditions. Key parameters such as filling
time, clamping forces, temperature distributions, and shear stress are analyzed to assess the
manufacturability and quality of the final product. The report also highlights critical figures,
including polymer viscosity graphs and flow front animations, to provide a visual
understanding of the process dynamics.

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
2. Information
Information : Model
Name: Default
Type: Shell
Volume: 18.88 (cm3)
Mass: 17.29 (G)
Size:
X: 167.00 (mm)
Y: 78.00 (mm)
Z: 4.00 (mm)

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
2. Information
Information : Model

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
2. Information
Information : Material
Material Name = PP
Product Name = Generic material / Generic PP
Melt Temperature = 230.00 °C
Mold Temperature = 50.00 °C
Ejection Temperature = 95.00 °C
Transition Temperature = 135.00 °C
Specific Heat = 1 3.100000e+07
Thermal Conductivity = 1 1.500000e+04
Young Modulus = 2 1.350000e+10 1.350000e+10
Poisson's Ratio = 2 4.000000e-01 4.000000e-01
WLF Parameters = 1 4.821429e+09
WLF Parameters = -1
WLF Parameters = 1 SIMPOE
WLF Parameters = -1
Please enter a number. = -1

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
2. Information
Information : Process Condition
FLOW/PACK
Filling Time = 4.671 sec
Main Material Melt Temperature = 230 °C
Mold Wall Temperature = 50 °C
Injection Pressure Limit = 100 MPa
Flow Rate Limit = 400 cc/s
Fill/Pack Switch Point (% Filled Volume) = 100 %
Pressure Holding Time = 6.58 sec
Total Time in Pack Stage = 46.709 sec
Auto Filling Time (1: Yes, 0: No) = 1
Auto Packing Time (1: Yes, 0: No) = 1
Venting Analysis (1: Yes, 0: No) = 0
Cavity Initial Air Pressure = 0.101 MPa
Cavity Initial Air Temperature = 30 °C
Temperature Criteria for Short Shots (1: Yes, 0: No) = 1
Temperature Criteria for Short Shots = 135 °C
Clamp Force Limit = 100 Tonne
2nd Material Injection Pressure Limit = 100 MPa
2nd Material Injection Flow Rate Limit = 194 cc/s
2nd Material Fill/Pack Switch Point (% Filled Volume) = 100 %
2nd Material Pressure Holding Time = 10 sec
2nd Material TotalA Time in Pack
Professional Stageof =Plastic
CAE Package 20 Injection
sec Mold
2. Information
Information : Process Condition
COOL
Melt Temperature = 230 °C
Min. Coolant Temperature = 25 °C
Air Temperature = 30 °C
Mold Open Time = 5 sec
Average Coolant Flow Rate = 150 cc/s
Control type(1:Eject temp., 2:Cooling time) = 1
Eject Temperature (if control type is "1") = 90 °C
Cooling Time (if control type is "2") = 12 sec

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
2. Information
Information : Process Condition
WARP
Ambient Temperature = 30 °C

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
3. Summary
FLOW Result
X-dir. Clamping Force= 0.0600 Tonne
Y-dir. Clamping Force= 0.3000 Tonne
Z-dir. Clamping Force= 1.0800 Tonne
Required injection pressure= 15.1900 Mpa
Max. central temperature= 230.6100 °C
Max. average temperature= 215.0100 °C
Max. bulk temperature= 231.6400 °C
Max. shear stress= 0.1500 Mpa
Max. shear rate= 10805.8000 1/sec
Averaged perfect cooling time= 59.9000 sec
CPU Time= 19.92 sec
Cycle Time = 1237.36 sec
|- 1. Filling Time = 4.63 sec
|- 2. Cooling Time = 1227.72 sec
|- 3. Mold Open Time = 5.00 sec

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
3. Summary
PACK Result
No data.

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
3. Summary
COOL Result
No data.

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
3. Summary
WARP Result
No data.

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
4. Special Note

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Viscosity Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Specific-Volume Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Specific-Heat Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Thermal-Conductivity Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Elastic-Modulus Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Poisson-Ratio Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Linear-Thermal-Expansion-Coefficient Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Material Parameter
Polymer Relaxation-Modulus Graph

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Result
Max. Inlet Pressure

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Result
Melt Front Flow Rate

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Result
X-dir. Clamping Force

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Result
Y-dir. Clamping Force

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : Result
Z-dir. Clamping Force

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Filling Animation

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Fill Time

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Pressure at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Central Temperature at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Average Temperature at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Bulk Temperature at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Flow Front Central Temperature

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Temperature Growth at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Shear Stress at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Shear Rate at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Volumetric Shrinkage at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Frozen Layer Fraction at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Cooling Time

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Temperature at End of Cooling

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Sink Marks

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Velocity Vector at End of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Gate Filling Contribution

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Ease of Fill

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Weld Lines

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : FLOW
Air Traps

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : PACK
No Data

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : COOL
No Data

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : WARP
No Data

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
5. Figures
Figures : User-Defined
No Data

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold
CONCLUSION
• The simulation results demonstrate that the injection molding process for the PP
component is feasible under the specified conditions. The FLOW stage analysis
reveals optimal filling times and acceptable temperature distributions, while the
clamping forces remain within safe limits. However, the absence of data for the
PACK, COOL, and WARP stages suggests potential areas for further investigation.
Overall, the findings provide valuable insights for optimizing the manufacturing
process, ensuring product quality, and minimizing defects. Future work could include
refining the cooling strategy and validating the warp predictions to enhance the
model's accuracy.

A Professional CAE Package


of Plastic Injection Mold

You might also like