Reason and Impartiality
Reason and Impartiality
IMPARTIALITY
As requirements for ethics
learning Objectives
01 02 03
Define and Analyze ethical Develop and apply
explain the roles dilemmas using strategies to
of reason and reason, reduce biases and
impartiality in demonstrating ensure impartiality
ethical decision- impartiality by in ethical choices,
making, considering all emphasizing the
illustrating how relevant
they contribute
importance of fair
perspectives and
to fairness and treatment and
avoiding biases.
justice logical reasoning.
You might be wondering, "Why should human beings be moral? Why should I do
what is right?"
Here are some compelling reasons:
A relevant definition of reason to our topic is "the power of the mind to think,
understand, and form judgments by a proces of logis" (Merriam-Webster ©2017).
However, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western
philosophy. Immanuel Kant, argued that reason alone is the basis for morality, and
once the person understood this basic requirement for morality, he or she would
see that acting morally is the same as acting rationally (Beck, 1960). In Kant's
view, the definition of morality alone shows that a person must decide what to do.
You, as a person, are able to think and reflect on different actions and then choose
what action to take. That a moral decision means mere desires did not force you to
act in a particular manner. You acted by the power of your will.
is reason a requirement for morality?
In decision-making, specify the relevant values that you want to uphold in making your
decision. Then compare whether your alternative actions are in line with your values.
Identifying the values and comparing your action with these values are important
because it will help identify if your alternative action is illegal or unethical, thus making
this action easy to discard.
Remember the scenarion we presented early in our discussion where you were a paniot
executive, and you accidentally found our that your officemate was making nomalous
transactions at the expense of your company! (Introduction, Topic 1, When do you say a
situation is a moral experience) You were in a dilemma on whether or not to divulge
what you knew because you found out about the anomaly by illegally logging in to your
officemates computer.
Compare the Alternatives with the
Principles
Your posible actions were to keep quiet, confront your officemate, or report him to
the administration. In thus situation, what are the values that need to be upheld?
Let us say, the value is honesty. Now, compare the alternatives with the value of
honesty. Does keeping quiet uphold honesty! No. Does confronting your
officemate uphold honesty! No Does reporting your officemate to the
administration leven if you had to admit that you illegally used his computer)
uphold bonesty! Yes. Thus, based on this list, you now know which among the
three possible actions is the moral decision.
Why is it important to have a system in making decisions? In systematically
consulering your set of vahes, the risk of overlooking important principles and
considerations are reduced. Hence, the chance of doing something you will regret
in the future is also reduced.
Weigh the
Consequences