Organisational Structures
Organisational Structures
STRUCTURES
INTRODUCTION TO ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Add a Footer 22
DIFFERENT TYPES OF
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
3
DIVISIONAL
Add a Footer 44
DEMERITS
MERITS
• Conflicts may arise among different divisions
• Product specialization helps in development of
regarding allocation of funds
various skills in a division head
• Leads to increase in cost since there can be
• It provides a proper basis for performance
duplications of activities across products.
measurement as different departments can be
• Sometimes it provides manager with authorities
easily identified
to supervise all the activities but if the manager
• Promotes flexibility and initiative, since each
is biased it will affect the working of division as
divisions functions as an autonomous unit
well as whole organization
Add a Footer 55
LINE
Add a Footer 66
DEMERITS
MERITS
• There is concentration of authority at the top
• Simple to understand and easy to establish.
level. It leads to autocratic control.
• Provides unit of command.
• Communication flows from top to bottom. There
• Helps in taking quick and effective decisions.
is no participation of workers.
• Ensures personal contact between workers and
• It lacks specialization as a line manager is
manager
responsible for both planning and execution of
• Ensures discipline between the employees and
work.
employer
• Overburdens the top executives.
Add a Footer 77
FUNCTIONAL
Add a Footer 88
DEMERITS
MERITS
• Against the principle of unity of command as the
• Helps to reap the benefits of specialization.
subordinate is responsible to a number of superiors.
• Subordinates can make use of the expertise of
• The complex nature of functional organization with
functional experts.
its cross relationship creates a confusion among
• The burden of top executive is reduced as each
workers.
expert looks after only one function.
• The decision making is very slow.
• Leads to joint supervision by different experts.
• Scope of lack of coordination as each specialist
• Provides better scope for expansion and
thinks of only his function and choses to ignore
diversification.
other functions.
Add a Footer 99
LINE AND STAFF
Add a Footer 10
10
FEATURES
There are two major types of features in a line-staff organization. They include:
Line positions
• The employees that fulfill line positions make direct contributions to the mission of the
company.
• They handle the responsibilities to help the business run smoothly. Line positions can either
include managers or entry-level employees.
Staff positions
• Staff employees assist the line professionals in achieving organizational goals. There are also
managerial and lower-level employees who hold staff positions.
• The staff managers are experts in the industry, providing recommendations to line managers on
how to lead their departments to success.
Add a Footer 11
11
MERITS DEMERITS
• This combination provides for specialized • It creates confusion as it is very difficult to define
knowledge where staff executives guide and the authority relationship between line and staff.
advise line executives. • Staff executives are not accountable and they
• It reduces the burden of line executives because may not take the tasks seriously.
staff carries on detailed investigation of each • There is always constant conflict between line
activity. and staff because the nature of their functions
• Better decisions are possible as expertise of the differs from each other.
staff is used.
Add a Footer 12
12
MATRIX
Add a Footer 13
13
DEMERITS
MERITS
• Confusion regarding roles, responsibilities and
• Improve decision-making, since there are two
priorities
chains of command.
• Divided loyalties between project teams
• Help break down traditional 'silo' barriers.
• Blurred lines of accountability
• Improve communication across the business.
• Difficulties in coordinating tasks or functions
• Allow staff to apply their skills in different roles.
Add a Footer 14
14
CIRCULAR
Add a Footer 15
15
MERITS
• Provides strong, centralized leadership and
DEMERITS
vision.
• Supports communication and collaboration • May be confusing for those accustomed to
across divisions and encourages a spirit of shared traditional hierarchies.
purpose to improve resource sharing and decision • May require additional resources and training to
making. ensure optimal buy-in and performance.
• Self-sustaining; distribution of duties and strong
collaboration insulate against disruptions due to
staff changes.
Add a Footer 16
16
A CASE STUDY :
A N E W LY D E V E LO P E D
S P I C E CO M PA N Y I N A
R U R A L S E T- U P
Add a Footer 17
PALAMPUR
PALAMPUR
1. Majority of the people engaged
in agriculture and related
activities
18
NATHU : shop vendor (having a
small all in one ration shop)
RAM
SETH KARODIMAL : money
lender ( a big name in Palampur)
1. A small company
2. 4 spices –
• TURMERIC
• CHILLI POWDER
• GARAM MASALA
• CHILLY FLAKES
3. Basic functions of –
• PRODUCTION
• SALE
• ACCOUNTS
• DISTRIBUTION
20
NATHU : Beta, which organizational
BHAVESH structure should we implement?
BHAVESH (thinks……………)
21
FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
BHAVESH suggest his father to opt for the functional organizational structure.
Reasons given by him were –
1. A SMALL ORGANISATION – The company opened decided to be started by them was in
its initial stage with nil or negligible level of diversification.
2. SPECIALISATION – Each member will focus on only one department thus gaining the
advantage of improved effectiveness and efficiency, subsequently leading to specialization.
• PRODUCTION - LACHHURAM
• SALE - NATHU
• ACCOUNTS – RAM
• DISTRIBUTION – SETH KARODIMAL
3. ACCOUNTABILITY – There are clear lines of management thus, accountability can be
established regarding each function.
Add a Footer 22
22
THANK YOU
Add a Footer 23
23