Leadership Skills: by Dr. Ogundele J.I
Leadership Skills: by Dr. Ogundele J.I
GST 206
BY DR. OGUNDELE J.I.
LEADERSHIP: Meaning, Types,
Theories and Styles
• Meaning:
Leadership as a concept has been defined in various ways by different scholars.
Of all these definitions, one logical conclusion that can be drawn is that
leadership represents the process of influencing others (followers) to work
willingly towards an organisational goal with keenness and confidence.
. Cole (2004), explains leadership as an individual in a group responsible for the
group’s result, but actively seeks the collaboration and commitment of all the
group members in achieving group goals in a particular context.
. Dans(1974), defines leadership as the ability to persuade others to seek defined
objectives and goals. Stoychill (1952), defines leadership as the process of
influencing the activities of an organised group towards goal setting and goal
attainment
• Elements of Leadership:
AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP
This is a leader that is authoritarian, dictatorial and doesn't tolerate
advice or suggestions from subordinates. He commands and does
not discuss with people. He does not tolerate information from
people and he is in total control of the organization
BUREAUCRATIC LEADERSHIP
This is a leader that believes in official protocols by following
strictly laid down rules and regulations. He is fair and impartial in
dealing with people and he makes chain of command and division
of work clear to all. He is inflexible and inefficient in handling new
but complex changing situations. He often prevents peoples
creativity, enthusiasm and morale through official rules
DIPLOMATIC LEADERSHIP
This is a leader that encourages two way communication by asking questions
from subordinates in order to reduce errors. He gives time to explain and
discuss with subordinates. He encourages co-operation and motivation of staff.
He has good morale by giving respect to human dignity
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
This type of leader allows people to participate in decision making. He is open
to all staff and encourages two way communication. He encourages people to
express their views on critical issues, information and ideas. By allowing people
to partake, people feel important, respected and recognised. He allows
subordinates to develop their full potentials, use their talents and accomplish
their goals in life.
FREE REIN LEADERSHIP
Various empirical studies have been carried out on leadership and leadership styles. Such
empirical work included that of R. LIKERT (1961). According to him, successful leadership must
involve a process of employee participation in the work structuring and work environment. He
advocated democratic supervision with open and effective communication without conflict.
Two types of leaders he identified were
a) Task oriented leadership
b) Employees oriented leadership
According to him, task oriented are only concerned with the design of work and the
development of work to increase productivity while employees oriented leaders improve the
performances of followers through human relations. Such leaders encourage supportive
relationship and allow maximum participation in decision making by setting high performance
goals for the work unit.
Likert Four Leadership Styles
System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4
Blake and Mouton used Task- oriented and Employee- oriented Leadership styles
to explain leadership behaviour. Blake’s grid provides a 1-9 scale so that a leader
can be given rating for ‘concern for people’ and ‘concern for task’
Style 1,1--- low concern for people and low concern for work
Style 1,9 –high concern for employees but low concern for work
Style 9,1 –high concern for production and low concern for employees
Style 5,5 –intermediate concern for both production and employee
Style 9,9 –high concern for both production and employees(democratic style-the
best leadership style)
Other Leadership Styles
• Democratic style: The leader makes decision based on input from each team
member
• Autocratic style: The leader takes decision without input from the anyone who
reports to him
• Laissez –faire style: The leader gives freedom and authority to employees but
they are still accountable to him
• Strategic style: The leader sits at the intersection between the company’s main
operations and its growth opportunities. He accepts burden of executive interests
while ensuring that current working conditions remain stable for everyone
• Transformational style: The leader transforms and improves upon the company’s
conventions. Employees may have tasks and goals that they complete weekly, the
leader is always pushing them outside their comfort zone
• Transactional style: The leader rewards his employees precisely for
the work they do and he establishes roles and responsibilities for each
employee
• Coach – style: The leader focuses on identifying and nurturing the
individual strengths of each member of his team that will make his
team achieve success.
• Bureaucratic style: The leader follows protocols. He might listen to
employees and consider their input, but, rejects employees’ input
that runs contrary to the company policy or normal practices.
LEADERSHIP AND TEAM
BUILDING SKILLS
• One of the functions of a good leader is building a team he/she is leading
effectively and successfully. A leader who cannot build a team successfully is a
failure. To build a team, there are certain principles, approaches, steps and types
of team building every leader must understand.
• Team building is the process of turning a group of individuals into a cohesive body
or unit; where a team consists of a group of people organised to work co-
operatively to meet the needs of their customers and accomplishing the goals and
purpose of that team.
• Team building is a job design in which employees are viewed as members of
interdependent teams instead of as individual workers.
• A leader should possess the capacity to identify and mobilise individual employees
to form a team that stays together, works together and achieves common goals.
Reasons for Team Building By a
Leader
• The need for close interaction, exchange of ideas, networking and getting to
know one another in the organization.
• The need to have team work and to boost performance of team members.
• The need to ensure competition among team members in order to promote
effectiveness and high productivity
• The desire to encourage team spirit that can engender motivation and
celebration of success among team members.
• To establish effective communication that will pave way for harmonious
working relationship
• The need to ensure maximum co-operation, unity of purpose and target
achievements among employees assigned to various groups.
Principles of Team Building
• A leader should know very well all his team members in terms of their names, skills, knowledge,
history, experience, attitudes, ability, mood and behaviour in order to manage them properly. etc.
• There should be effective communication between a leader and his team and among the team
members
• Team members must always co-operate in order to accept and support the objectives of the team
• The leader and team members must always share ideas and promote understanding among
themselves
• There must always be compromise among team members in order to move the team forward
and achieve the team’s objectives.
• Conflicts must be resolved quickly and constructively among team members to avoid failure
• There must be genuine interpersonal relations existing between the leader and team members.
• The leader should study each of the team members especially in the period of problem and strive
to come to the aid of any team member having challenges by finding quick and reasonable
solution .
• When problem arises, it should be made open and solution must be
proffered collectively and quickly.
• Team members must develop the culture of moving/ working at the same
pace to avoid delays.
• Relevant information that can promote the success of the team must not
be hidden by any team member, rather, it should be brought to the
members awareness quickly
• FIVE MAJOR APPROACHES TO TEAM BUILDING
• Setting goals: Individual objectives and team goals must be well stated and
should be harmonised in order to get involved in action plan so as to know
ways to define success, failure and achieve goals.
• Role Clarification: Team members’ roles and duties should be clearly
stated in order to promote understanding and reduce
confusion/ambiguity.
• Problem Solving: Major problems facing the team must be quickly
identified and addressed in order to help the team achieve its goals
• Interpersonal Relations: There must be interpersonal relations and
harmony of interest among members in order to work co-operatively
towards common goals
• Commitment: There must be commitment and steadfast belief in
success among team members with dogged determination to succeed
no matter the magnitude of challenges they face.
TYPES OF TEAM BUILDING
• 1)Value Based Team Building: This one is philanthropic in nature by providing memorable
experience to the team members. It allows a team to have a sense of belonging and social
responsibility. e.g. building local shelter or bus stop shelter or donating building for health
care services in a particular community.
• 2)Skilled Based Team Building: This involves teaching a new skill that team members can
quickly implement. Examples are sales, leadership, negotiation and conflict management
training skills.
• 3)Activities Based Team Building: This allows a team to unite in order to achieve common
goal. It takes team members out of comfort zone to explore various environments and
challenges along their ways of attaining their objectives. This will allow team members to
work together with high level of trust and it is a rewarding exercise. This can be divided into
two namely: Physical activities and Intellectual activities
• A)Physical activities take a team members out of their immediate environment and getting
them moving. e.g. jogging, playing ball, cricket, golf etc.
• B)Intellectual activities: These bring challenges to a team in order to work together
as a group towards a goal with intellectual reasoning. It is a problem- solving and
thought process of a team members to jointly tackle a difficult problem.
• 4)Team Bonding: This helps team members to develop strong working relationship
by knowing one another deeply. It is a way of bringing in-depth friendship and unity
among team members. e.g. when all team members go to relaxation centre to have
social gathering.
• STEPS IN A SUCCESSFUL TEAM BUILDING
• 1. Consider whether a team is the best option in terms of the quality of members,
objectives, mission and vision of the team
• 2. Think carefully about the nature of the project or tasks to be carried out relative
to the experience and skills of team members
• 3. Plan your team strategy relative to time, resources, tasks and roles, trust among
members and objectives of the team
• 4. Get the team together and establish operating rules to guide members.
• 5.Identify individual strengths and weaknesses relative to the tasks ahead and build upon
the strengths and correct the weaknesses
• 6.Establish atmosphere that will foster commitment among team members
• 7.Define the specific roles and responsibilities of each of the team members
• 8.Allow effective communication to spread among the team members and the team leader
• 9.Establish good working procedures, effective decision making and positive interpersonal
relationship.
• 10. Hold meetings regularly to review the progress made in a bid to achieve the stated
objectives.
Significance of Team Building
• It enhances better communication among employees in organization
• It motivates employees to remain committed to duty and perform excellently
• It is a strategy designed to develop problem solving skills among people
• It gives leaders the opportunity to see their subordinates as colleagues
working towards common goal
• It promotes employees morale in the workplace
• It promotes cordial relationship among team members thereby enhancing
high productivity
• It allows teams to initiate change by providing innovative ideas and feedback
to the organization.
LEADERSHIP AND
COMMUNICATION SKILLS
• Communication is the transfer of information from the sender to the recipient
(receiver) with the message being clearly understood by the 9 receiver)s recipient.
• It is a tool used by every leader in organisation to project the objectives, images,
mission, vision and direction to people within and outside the organisation.
• The degree of co-operation and unity existing among employees and between a leader
and his subordinates in an organisation and the relationship with the external
environment are based on effectiveness or otherwise of communication process.
• A leader needs communication because, it links an organisation to the outside world,
links every department of the organisation, explains what an organisation stands and
where it is going and what it hopes to achieves
• A leader uses communication to link the basic functions of management in work
organisation namely: planning, leading, co-ordinating, controlling, organising and
motivating
• Communication remains a binding force that unites the entire organisation
by linking every unit of the organisation.
• It is through effective communication by a leader that the management can
reach out to inform, influence or activate every stakeholder in the workplace.
• Organisational communication is the exchange of information, ideas and
views within and outside the organisation.
• Every organisation has major objectives and stakeholders. To achieve these
objectives, there must be successful communication with the respective
stakeholders and groups. Communication is, therefore, the process of
allowing free flow of information within a network of interdependent
relationship between a leader and his/her subordinates.
Types of Communication
• Leaders use two major types of communication: verbal and non-verbal
communication
• 1) Verbal communication is the written or oral use of words to communicate.
• A)Written communication occurs through different means such as business
letters, reports, office memoranda, newsletters, policy manuals etc.
• B)Oral communication takes place largely through face-to-face conversation
with another individual, meetings with several individuals and telephone
conversations.
• 2)Non-verbal communication: This is expressed by means of elements and
behaviours that are not coded into words such as facial expressions, tone of
the voice, moody appearance etc.
Channels of Communication
• Internal Operational Communication: This is a communication that occurs in order to carry out
operations of the organisation such as between and among workers, managers, board of directors,
members of trade unions. It may be in form of oral or written communication
• External Operational Communication: This is communication with external parties or groups such
as customers, suppliers, government agencies, regulatory authority, local community, general
public and special interest groups. This type of communication takes the form of letters, telephone
calls, business meetings, press releases, press conferences, product launch, publicity films etc.
ACCOMMODATING COLLABORATING
HIGH
Co-operativeness COMPROMISING
(concern for
others)
AVOIDING COMPETING
LOW
• The laissez-faire manager risks becoming too hands off. It's still important to monitor performance, communicate
expectations and provide the team with the tools they need to operate.
• Some managers may use laissez-faire with experienced employees whom they trust and exercise tighter control of others.
• The Transformative Leader
• Transformative or transformational leader is big-picture thinker. This type of leader doesn't just want
his staff to complete the current project; he wants to develop and improve the team to be even
better next time. Transformative leader has a vision of the future, and he aims the team toward it.
• Transformational leader is inspiring, stimulating and imaginative. He values his people and holds
both himself and his team accountable. Because he keeps his eyes on the future, he may need a
right-hand person to focus him on the present.
• The Democratic Leader
• A democratic leader makes the final decision but wants feedback from team members first. This type
of leader wants to know what the team thinks and takes the members' opinions into account.he
believes in collective participation in decision making
• Workers usually prefer this style to autocratic leadership. Their opinions matter, which keeps them
engaged in the project. Soliciting input and weighing it before deciding is slow, however, and may be
too inefficient when quick decisions are needed.
• The Bureaucratic Leader
• Bureaucratic leader derives his authority from the organization's hierarchy. The department chair or
project leader doesn't depend on personal charm to lead. The bureaucracy's rules assign the leader his
authority and duties, and that's good enough.
• This leadership style is often valuable in industries that have to be tightly regulated. It can actually be
efficient because the leader's role is clearly defined, and leader is accountable to his own boss.
• If decisions have to be vetted by several layers of management, however, bureaucracy can be slow and
cumbersome. Lower-ranked employees may find it difficult to get feedback or suggestions far enough up
the hierarchy to make a difference.
• The Charismatic Leader
• The charismatic leader sits at the opposite pole from the bureaucrat. His authority lies in his personality
and presence, not in the power the company assigns him.
• Leading by charisma can be effective and inspiring, much like a transformational leader. The difference is
that transformational leadership's effects last after the leader moves on. Charismatic leaders' inspiration
• The Transactional Leader
• To a transactional leader, running a team is about carrots and sticks. Employees are rewarded if they do well and are
disciplined or criticized if they don't. Transactional leader assumes that rewards and penalties coupled with clear
instructions should be enough to produce good results.
• For a simple, short task, a transactional approach can produce good results. It often comes off as inflexible, which
employees find frustrating.
• The Servant Leader
• For the servant leader, the needs of the team come first. He values the team's input, shares power willingly and puts a
high priority on employee satisfaction. It is sometimes described as "altruistic leadership."
• Servant leadership boosts employees’ satisfaction with their jobs and can increase their commitment. Critics of this style
say it's misplaced in valuing the employees' needs over the company's. It isn't a good fit for all organizations.
• The Situational Leader
• The situational leader shifts styles whenever it's necessary. When talking with top management, he may solicit input and
feedback. When addressing workers on the assembly line, he is more bureaucratic or authoritarian. He may be laissez-
faire with established employees and more involved with new ones.
• The drawback to situational leadership is that not everyone is comfortable with it. If you're naturally drawn to
• Benefits of organizational leadership :
• Improved productivity of the workforce is guaranteed with his capacity to control and co-ordinate the employees
• He helps to improve ability of the subordinates to succeed under pressure through proper coaching method
• He uses increased emotional intelligence to understand the behaviours and attitudes of the subordinates and react
wisely to issues bordering on work arrangement.
• He improves charisma and seriousness in business operations through effective supervision and capacity to control
• He develops confidence in his team that encourages team members to perform excellently
• He demonstrates listening and communication skills to promote network of relationship among the employees
• He promotes increased awareness of diversity in the workforce that enhances workplace unity and co-operation for
effective performance
. He improves innovation and creativity in the workplace by bringing in new ideas, suggestions and ways to achieve
the best result
• He nurtures and achieves dependable, reliable and competent workforce for the success of the organization.
•
Leadership and Negotiating skills
• Negotiation is a process of dialogue between two or more people or groups in
order to resolve their differences and reach agreement (Salamon, 2000).
• Negotiation refers to the process of bargaining between employer or employers’
organisation and workers’ representatives or workers’ organisation.
• From these two definitions, it is apparent that negotiation is when two or more
people find an acceptable solution to their common problem through discussion.
• Skill implies an ability or proficiency or capacity acquired through systematic and
sustained effort in order to perform a task or do a particular job. Skill is affected
by individual’s level of education, experience, personality and training.
• Negotiating skills are, therefore, the capacities or abilities acquired in order to
find an acceptable solution to a shared problem between two or more people or
groups.
• In leadership positions, witnessing conflict or disagreement between parties is
unavoidable, hence, negotiating skills are needed to enhance and formalise
bargaining and reach agreement.
• Negotiating skills are also the methods and means adopted through which
divergent opinion and interests expressed between two or more people or
groups are resolved for an agreement to be reached.
• When negotiating skills are understood issues of difference can be resolved
quickly by the two parties involved.
• Negotiation may be in two dimensions:
• Competitive Negotiation: This takes place when there is a need to divide limited
resources between two parties. It involves the use of a win – lose approach/
strategy in which the negotiating parties have opposing interests. Emotional
tactics, concession and harsh words are used to gain result. It is otherwise called
adversarial negotiation.
• Co-operative negotiation: It is a problem solving approach based on win- win
situation. It involves joint solution to the problem at stake that will eventually
benefit both parties
Conditions for effective
Negotiating skills
• There must be parties who are willing to sit down and discuss properly.
• The participants must be dependent on one another to have their respective
needs met or interests satisfied.
• Participants must be ready to dialogue and get information that can assist to
resolve their differences.
• Negotiators must have some means to influence the attitudes or behaviour or
other negotiators by asking important questions and providing needed
information.
• Participants must be ready to agree on some common issues for progress to be
made
• There must be willingness to settle indifferences among participants.
• Since the outcome of negotiation is unpredictable, it is important that
negotiators must have urgency to reach agreement.
• Negotiators must believe that there are acceptable settlement options that are
possible as a result of participation in the process.
• Participants in negotiation must have authority to make decision that is
satisfactory to all parties.
• The agreement must be reasonable and capable of implementation.
• There must be adequate interpersonal skills, money and time to engage fully in
dialogue process
Techniques for negotiation