Introduction
Introduction
Introduction to
corporate
finance
Corporate Finance
Ross, Westerfield, Jaffe & Jordan
Outline
I. What is corporate finance?
II. The importance of cash flows
III. The goal of financial management
IV. The agency problem and control of the corporation
V. Ethics, sustainability, and corporate governance
VI. Financial markets
Main tasks of corporate
finance
• Capital budgeting: the process of planning and
managing a firm’s long-term investments fixed
assets.
• Example: deciding whether or not to open a new
restaurant.
• Example: deciding whether or not to introduce a new line
of products.
• Capital structure: the mixture of debt and equity
maintained by the firm S-T and L-T debt and equity.
• Working capital management: a firm’s short-term
assets and liabilities current assets and current
liabilities.
The Capital Budgeting
Decision
Current
Current Liabilities
Assets Long-Term
Debt
Taxes
Ultimately, the firm The cash flows from
must be a cash- the firm should exceed
Government (D)
generating activity. the cash flows from
the financial markets.
Possible goals of financial
management
Survive
Beat the competition
Maximize sales
Maximize net income
Maximize market share
Minimize costs
Maximize the value of (stock) shares
The “appropriate” goal of
financial management
Maximize the (fundamental or economic)
value of (stock) shares is the right goal.
Why? Shareholders own shares. Managers,
as agents, ought to act in a way to benefit
shareholders; i.e., to enhance the value of
the shares.
A limitation of this goal is that value is not
directly observable.
A sample question
The primary goal of financial management is to:
a. maximize current dividends per share of the
existing stock.
b. maximize the current value per share of the
existing stock.
c. avoid financial distress.
d. minimize operational costs and maximize firm
efficiency.
e. maintain steady growth in both sales and net
earnings.
Home Depot CEO gets $210
million severance for sucking at
job
Robert L. Nardelli, the CEO of Home Depot, who came
under heavy criticism for his pay package and failure to
lift the chain ’s stagnant stock price, has abruptly
resigned. He will receive about $210 million in
compensation from the company, including the current
value of retirement and other benefits. Who would blame
him for quitting?
Source:digg.com; submitter: tennova.
Value vs. price
The value of shares are not observable. In
contrast, the price of shares can be observable.
If one believes that share price is an
accurate/good estimate of share value, the
appropriate goal would be to maximize the price
of shares.
This belief/assumption is, however, questionable.
But the previous slide (Home Depot ex-CEO),
nevertheless, showed that investors care about
stock price, and that stock price performance is
very important to the tenure of managers.
Value maximization and
corporate social responsibility
Corporate social responsibility (CSR): On a voluntary
basis, firms go beyond their legal and contractual
obligations to operate in ways that enhance rather than
degrade society and the environment; e.g., using fair-
trade ingredients (coffee, tea); providing incentives for
employee engagement in community service; reducing
carbon footprint, etc.
Do engaging in CSR lead to value maximization? It
depends.
3 visions of CSR (Benabou
and Tirole, 2010,
Economica)
Vision 1: Win-Win (doing well by doing good).
Being a good corporate citizen can also
maximize firm value. This is particularly so for
the so-called “strategic CSR” that takes a
socially responsible stance to strengthen one’s
market position and raise rivals’ costs and
thereby increase long-term profits and firm
value; e.g., Patagonia’s environmental
activism.
This vision does not raise any specific
corporate governance issue: this vision of CSR
is consistent with value maximization.
A no-win situation
The NBA's Golden State Warriors have distanced themselves from
executive board member and minority owner Chamath
Palihapitiya after he repeatedly said he didn't care "about what's
happening to the Uyghurs" on a podcast.
"As a limited investor who has no day-to-day operating functions
with the Warriors, Mr. Palihapitiya does not speak on behalf of our
franchise, and his views certainly don't reflect those of our
organization," the San Francisco team said Monday.
Chamath Palihapitiya is the founder of the Social capital, whose
mission is to “advance humanity by solving the world’s hardest
problems.”
Chamath’s father applied for refugee status in Canada, on the
basis that his father had been criticized for his views on the
violence during the Sri Lankan civil war.
Source: 01/08/2022, CBS; Wikipedia.
3 Visions of CSR
Vision 2: Delegated philanthropy. Some stakeholders of the
firm (e.g., employees, customers, investors) are willing to
sacrifice money (e.g., wages, purchasing power, returns) so
as to further social goals. These stakeholders do not have
competitive advantages to pursue their philanthropy due to
information barriers or transaction costs. They have some
demand for corporations to engage in philanthropy on their
behalf; that is, delegated philanthropy.
Example: employees who are passionate in community
service are often the most motivated employees. Firms have
incentives to provide incentives for employee engagement in
community service.
Counterexample: “sin stocks” are disliked in the sense that
they are perceived to be of higher risk, thus sold at a lower
price (Hong and Kacperczky, 2009, JFE).
This vision does not raise any specific corporate governance
issue: this vision of CSR is consistent with value
maximization.
CSR and sustainability
Bolton and Kacperczyk (2021, JFE) find that stocks of
firms with higher total CO2 emissions (and changes in
emissions) are perceived to be of higher risk.
Investors demand compensation for their exposure to
carbon emission risk.
The prices of stocks with higher carbon risk are on
average lower.
Shareholders and other
stakeholders
Customers
Suppliers
Employees (human capital and assets)
Creditors (bondholders, banks, debtholders)
Government: tax and regulations
Community (local / global)
Owner/shareholder
3 visions of CSR
Vision 3 (Friedman’s critique, 1970): Insider-initiated
corporate philanthropy. The prosocial behavior (e.g.,
donation to a beloved museum) is not motivated by
stakeholders’ demands or the desire to strengthen the
firm’s long-term market position, but rather reflects
management’s or the board members’ own desires to
engage in philanthropy.
This is doing charity with others’ money.
This vision raises serious corporate governance issues.
This vision of CSR is not consistent with value
maximization; it destroys firm value.
The agency problem
Agency relationship:
Principals (citizens) hire an agent (the president) to
represent their interest.
Principles (stockholders) hire agents (managers) to run
the company.
Agency problem:
Conflict of interest between principals and agents.
This occurs in a corporate setting whenever the agents
do not hold 100% of the firm’s shares.
The source of agency problems is the separation of
(owners’) control and management.
Example: the 3rd vision of CSR.
Agency costs
Direct costs: (1) unnecessary expenses, such as a
corporate jet, and (2) monitoring costs.
Indirect costs. For example, a manager may choose
not to take on the optimal investment. She/he may
prefer a less risky project so that she/he has a higher
probability keeping her/his tenure.
Managerial incentives
Managerial goals are frequently different from
shareholders’ goals.
Expensive perks.
Survival.
Independence.