The Appendix
The Appendix
Yonas A.
July, 2016
1
Anatomy
• The relationship of the base of the appendix
to the cecum remains constant, whereas the
tip can be found in a retrocecal, pelvic,
subcecal, right pericolic, preileal, or post-ileal
position
• The appendix can vary in length from less than
1 cm to greater than 30 cm; most appendices
are 6 to 9 cm in length
2
Physiology
• It is now well recognized that the appendix is an
immunologic organ that actively participates in the
secretion of immunoglobulins, IgA
4
Epidemiology
• Appendectomy for appendicitis is the most commonly performed
emergency operation in the world
• The lifetime rate of appendectomy is 12% for men and 25% for
women, with approximately 7% of all people undergoing
appendectomy for acute appendicitis
• There is a slight male to female predominance (M:F 1.2 to 1.3:1)
• Appendicitis is a disease of the young, with 40% of the cases
occurring in patients between the ages of 10 and 29 years
• It is assumed that there is a 15% negative appendectomy rate
• In 1886, the associated mortality rate of appendicitis was around
67% without surgical therapy
– Currently, the mortality rate for acute appendicitis is reported to be less
than 1% 5
Cont.
• Despite an increased use of U/S, CT, and laparoscopy,
the rate of misdiagnosis of appendicitis has remained
constant (15.3%), so has the rate of appendiceal
rupture
11
Bacteriology
• The bacteriology of the normal appendix is similar to that
of the normal colon
• The appendiceal flora remains constant throughout life with the
exception of Porphyromonas gingivalis, which is seen only in adult
• The principal organisms seen in the normal appendix, in
acute appendicitis, and in perforated appendicitis are
E.coli and Bacteroides fragilis
– However, a wide variety of both facultative and anaerobic
bacteria and mycobacteria may be present
• Appendicitis is a polymicrobial infection, with some series
reporting up to 14 different organisms cultured in patients
with perforation 12
Common Organisms Seen in Patients with
Acute Appendicitis
13
Cont.
• Broad-spectrum antibiotics are indicated
• Antibiotic coverage is limited to 24 to 48 hours
in cases of nonperforated appendicitis
– For perforated appendicitis, 3 to 7 days is
recommended
• Intravenous antibiotics are usually given until
the WBC count is normal and the patient is
afebrile for 24 hours
14
Clinical presentation
• Abdominal pain is the prime symptom of acute
appendicitis
– Classically, pain is initially diffusely centered in the lower
epigastrium or umbilical area, is moderately severe, and is
steady, sometimes with intermittent cramping
superimposed
– After a period varying from 1 to 12 hours, but usually within
4 to 6 hours, the pain localizes to the right lower quadrant
– The classic pain sequence, although usual, is not invariable
• In some patients, the pain of appendicitis begins in the RLQ and
remains there
15
Cont.
• Cont.
– Variations in the anatomic location of the appendix account
for many of the variations in the principal locus of the
somatic phase of the pain
– A long appendix with the inflamed tip in the LLQ causes
pain in that area
– A retrocecal appendix principally may cause flank or back
pain
– A pelvic appendix, principally suprapubic pain
– A retroileal appendix may cause testicular pain, presumably
from irritation of the spermatic artery and ureter
16
Cont.
• Anorexia
– It nearly always accompanies appendicitis
• It is so constant that the diagnosis should be questioned
if the patient is not anorectic
• Vomiting
– Although vomiting occurs in nearly 75% of patients,
it is neither prominent nor prolonged and most
patients vomit only once or twice
– It is caused both by neural stimulation and the
presence of ileus
17
Cont.
• The sequence of symptom appearance has
great differential diagnostic significance
– In more than 95% of patients with acute
appendicitis, anorexia is the first symptom,
followed by abdominal pain, which is followed, in
turn, by vomiting (if vomiting occurs)
– If vomiting precedes the onset of pain, the
diagnosis of appendicitis should be questioned
18
Cont.
• Most patients give a history of obstipation
beginning prior to the onset of abdominal pain,
and many feel that defecation would relieve
their abdominal pain
• Psoas sign
– Performed by having patients lay on their left side as the
examiner slowly extends the right thigh, thus stretching
the iliopsoas muscle
• Obturator sign
– Performed by passive internal rotation of the flexed right
thigh with the patient supine
22
Laboratory
• CBC
– Mild leukocytosis, ranging from 10,000 to 18,000/mm3, is usually present
in patients with acute, uncomplicated appendicitis and is often
accompanied by a moderate polymorphonuclear predominance
• Numbers >18,000/mm3 should raise the possibility of a perforated appendix with
or without an abscess
• U/A
– Although several white or red blood cells can be present from ureteral or
bladder irritation as a result of an inflamed appendix, bacteriuria in a
catheterized urine specimen is not generally seen with acute appendicitis
• Urine HcG
– In females
23
Cont.
• Abdominal U/S
– The appendix is identified as a blind-ending,
nonperistaltic bowel loop originating from the cecum
– With maximal compression, the diameter of the
appendix is measured in the AP dimension
• A scan is considered positive if a noncompressible appendix
≥6 mm is demonstrated
– The presence of an appendicolith establishes the
diagnosis
– The presence of thickening of the appendiceal wall and
periappendiceal fluid is highly suggestive
24
Cont.
• Abdominal U/S
– Sonographic demonstration of a normal appendix, which is
an easily compressible blind-ending tubular structure
measuring ≤5 mm in diameter, excludes the diagnosis of
acute appendicitis
– The study is considered inconclusive if the appendix is not
visualized and there is no pericecal fluid or mass
– The sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis has a
reported sensitivity of 55-96% and a specificity of 85-98%
– Sonography is similarly effective in children and pregnant
women, although its application is somewhat limited in late
pregnancy
25
Cont.
• Cont.
– A false-positive scan can occur:
• Periappendicitis from surrounding inflammation
• A dilated fallopian tube can be mistaken for an inflamed appendix
• Inspissated stool can mimic an appendicolith
• In obese patients, the appendix may not be compressible because
of overlying fat
– False-negative sonograms can occur:
• If appendicitis is confined to the appendiceal tip
• If the appendix is retrocecal in location
• If the appendix is markedly enlarged and mistaken for small bowel
• If the appendix is perforated and therefore compressible
26
Cont.
• Cont.
– Sonography identified appendicitis in 10% of patients
who were believed to have a low likelihood of the
disease on physical examination
– The positive and negative predictive values of
ultrasonography have impressively been reported as
91 or 92%, respectively
• However, in a recent prospective multicenter study, routine
ultrasonography did not improve the diagnostic accuracy or
rates of negative appendectomy or perforation when
compared to clinical assessment
27
Cont.
• CT scan
– The inflamed appendix appears dilated (>5 mm) and the
wall is thickened
– There is usually evidence of inflammation, with "dirty fat,"
thickened mesoappendix, and even an obvious phlegmon
– Fecaliths can be easily visualized, but their presence is not
necessarily pathognomonic of appendicitis
– An important suggestive abnormality is the arrowhead
sign
• This is caused by thickening of the cecum, which funnels contrast
toward the orifice of the inflamed appendix
28
Cont.
• Cont.
– A number of studies have documented improvement in
diagnostic accuracy with the liberal use of CT scanning in
the workup of suspected appendicitis
– However, despite the potential usefulness of this
technique, there are significant disadvantages:
• It is expensive
• It exposes the patients to significant radiation
• It cannot be used during pregnancy
• Although the differences are rather small, CT scanning has
consistently proven superior over U/S in establishing the
diagnosis of appendicitis
29
Alvarado Scale for the Diagnosis of
Appendicitis
• Scores 0-4: appendicitis is unlikely
• Scores 5-6: compatible with, but not diagnostic of appendicitis
• Scores 7-8: high likelihood of appendicitis
• Scores 9-10: almost certain to have appendicitis
30
Appendiceal Rupture
• The overall rate of perforated appendicitis is 25.8%
• Children younger than age 5 years and patients older than
age 65 years have the highest rate of perforation (45 and
51% respectively)
• It has been suggested that delays in presentation are
responsible for the majority of perforated appendices
• Although it has been suggested that observation and
antibiotic therapy alone may be an appropriate treatment
for acute appendicitis, nonoperative treatment exposes
the patient to the increased morbidity and mortality
associated with a ruptured appendix
31
Cont.
• Appendiceal rupture occurs most frequently distal
to the point of luminal obstruction along the
antimesenteric border of the appendix
• Rupture should be suspected in the presence of
fever greater than 39°C and a WBC count
>18,000/mm3
• In the majority of cases, rupture is contained and
patients display localized rebound tenderness
– Generalized peritonitis will be present if the walling-off
process is ineffective in containing the rupture
32
Cont.
• In 2 to 6% of cases, an ill-defined mass will be
detected on physical examination
– This could represent a phlegmon, which consists
of matted loops of bowel adherent to the adjacent
inflamed appendix, or a periappendiceal abscess
• Patients who present with a mass have a
longer duration of symptoms, usually at least
5 to 7 days
33
Cont.
• Treatment
– Phlegmons and small abscesses can be treated
conservatively with intravenous antibiotics
• Interval appendectomy performed after at least 6 weeks
– Well-localized abscesses can be managed with
percutaneous drainage
– Complex abscesses should be considered for surgical
drainage
• It should be performed by using an extraperitoneal
approach, with appendectomy reserved for cases in which
the appendix is easily accessible
34
DDX
• The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of acute
appendicitis should be approximately 85%
• The most common erroneous preoperative
diagnoses—accounting for more than 75%—in
descending order of frequency are:
– Acute mesenteric lymphadenitis
– No organic pathologic conditions
– Acute pelvic inflammatory disease
– Twisted ovarian cyst or ruptured graafian follicle
– Acute gastroenteritis
35
Cont.
• The differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis
depends upon four major factors:
– The anatomic location of the inflamed appendix
– The stage of the process (i.e., simple or ruptured)
– The patient's age
– The patient's sex
36
Common DDX
• PUD perforation
• Regional enteritis (TB, Typhoid, Crohn’s)
• Colonic causes (diverticulitis, perforated colonic cancer)
• Right ureteric stone
• Right pyelonephritis
• Closed-loop intestinal obstruction
• Mesenteric vascular occlusion
• Pleuritis of the right lower chest
• Acute cholecystitis
• Acute pancreatitis
37
DDX in pediatrics
• Acute gastroenteritis
• Meckel's Diverticulitis
• Acute mesenteric lymphadenitis
• Intussusception
• HSP
38
DDX in females
• Pelvic inflammatory disease
• Ruptured graafian follicle (Mittelschmerz)
• Twisted ovarian cyst or tumor
• Endometriosis
• Ruptured ectopic pregnancy
39
DDX in males
• Torsion of the testis
• Acute epididymitis
• Seminal vesiculitis
40
Acute Appendicitis in the Young
• Children younger than 5 years of age have a negative
appendectomy rate of 25% and an appendiceal
perforation rate of 45%
• The establishment of a diagnosis of acute appendicitis in
young children is more difficult than in the adult
– The inability of young children to give an accurate history
– Diagnostic delays by both parents and physicians
– The frequency of gastrointestinal upset in children
• The more rapid progression to rupture and the inability
of the underdeveloped greater omentum to contain a
rupture lead to significant morbidity rates in children41
Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly
• In patients older than age 80 years, perforation rates of 49%
and mortality rates of 21% have been reported
• Although the incidence of appendicitis in the elderly is lower
than in younger patients, the morbidity and mortality are
significantly increased in this patient population
– Delays in diagnosis
– A more rapid progression to perforation
– Comorbid disease
• The diagnosis of appendicitis may be subtler and less typical
than in younger individuals, and a high index of suspicion
should be maintained
42
Acute Appendicitis During Pregnancy
• Appendicitis is the most frequently encountered
extrauterine disease requiring surgical treatment during
pregnancy
– The incidence is approximately 1 in 2000 pregnancies
• Acute appendicitis can occur at any time during pregnancy,
but is more frequent during the first two trimesters
• As fetal gestation progresses, the diagnosis of appendicitis
becomes more difficult as the appendix is displaced
laterally and superiorly
• The suspicion of appendicitis during pregnancy should
prompt rapid diagnosis and surgical intervention
43
Cont.
• Diagnosis
– Nausea and vomiting after the first trimester or new-onset
nausea and vomiting
– Abdominal pain and tenderness
• Rebound and guarding are less frequent because of laxity of the
abdominal wall
– Elevation of the WBC count above the normal pregnancy
levels of 15,000 to 20,000/L, with a predominance of
polymorphonuclear cells
– When the diagnosis is in doubt, abdominal ultrasound may
be beneficial
– Laparoscopy may be indicated in equivocal cases
44
Cont.
• The performance of any operation during
pregnancy carries a risk of premature labor of
10 to 15%
• The most significant factor associated with
both fetal and maternal death is appendiceal
perforation
– Fetal mortality increases from 3 to 5% in early
appendicitis to 20% with perforation
45
Location of the appendix during pregnancy
46
Appendicitis in Patients with AIDS or HIV
Infection
• The incidence of acute appendicitis in HIV-infected
patients is reported to be 0.5%
– This is higher than the 0.1 to 0.2% incidence reported for
the general population
48
Cont.
• The DDX of RLQ pain is expanded in HIV-infected
patients when compared to the general
population
– In addition to the conditions in uninfected
population, OIs should be considered as possible
causes of RLQ pain
• CMV, TB, Cryptococcus neoformans, and strongyloides,
Kaposi's sarcoma, lymphoma, and other causes of
infectious colitis
• Neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis) should also be
considered
49
Cont.
• In the HIV-infected patient with classic signs and
symptoms of appendicitis, immediate
appendectomy is indicated
– The negative appendectomy rate is 5 to 10%
• On the other hand, the data clearly support the need for interval
appendectomy
– After conservative trt a significant percentage of patients either continue
to have, or redevelop RLQ pain
– While the appendix may occasionally be pathologically normal, persistent
periappendiceal abscesses and adhesions are found in 80% of patients
55
Cont.
• The timing of interval appendectomy is
somewhat controversial
– Appendectomy may be required as early as 3
weeks following conservative therapy
– Two thirds of the cases of recurrent appendicitis
occur within 2 years
56
Post-op complications
• Most of the serious early complications are
septic and include abscess and wound
infection
57
Cont.
• Wound infection
– It is common, but is nearly always confined to the
subcutaneous tissues and promptly responds to
wound drainage, which is accomplished by
reopening the skin incision
– Wound infection predisposes the patient to
wound dehiscence
• The type of incision is relevant
– Complete dehiscence rarely occurs in a McBurney incision
58
Cont.
• Intra-abdominal abscess
– The sites of predilection for abscesses are the
appendiceal fossa, pouch of Douglas, subhepatic
space, and between loops of intestine
– Transrectal drainage is preferred for an abscess
that bulges into the rectum
59
Cont.
• Fecal fistula
– It is an annoying, but not particularly dangerous,
complication of appendectomy
– May be caused by:
• Sloughing of that portion of the cecum inside a
constricting purse-string suture
• The ligature's slipping off a tied, but not inverted,
appendiceal stump
• Necrosis from an abscess encroaching on the cecum
60
Cont.
• Intestinal obstruction
– Initially paralytic but sometimes progressing to
mechanical obstruction, may occur with slowly
resolving peritonitis with loculated abscesses and
exuberant adhesion formation
– Late adhesive band intestinal obstruction after
appendectomy does occur, but much less
frequently than after pelvic surgical therapy
61
Cont.
• Hernia
– The incidence of inguinal hernia is 3 times greater
in patients who have had an appendectomy
– Incisional hernia is like wound dehiscence in that
infection predisposes to it, it rarely occurs in a
McBurney incision, and it is not uncommon in a
lower right paramedian incision
62
Prognosis
• Principal factors in morbidity and mortality are whether
rupture occurs before surgical treatment and the age of the
patient
– The overall mortality rate for a general anesthetic is 0.06%
– The overall mortality rate in ruptured acute appendicitis is about
3%—a 50-fold increase
– The mortality rate of ruptured appendicitis in the elderly is
approximately 15%—a 5-fold increase from the overall rate
68
Incidental appendectomy
• While incidental appendectomy is generally neither clinically
nor economically appropriate, there are some special
circumstances during laparotomy or laparoscopy for other
indications in which it is routinely performed
– Crohn's disease patients in whom the cecum is free of macroscopic
disease
– Patients undergoing cytoreductive operations for ovarian
malignancies
– Children undergoing chemotherapy
– Individuals who are about to travel to remote places where there is
no access to medical/surgical care
– The disabled who cannot describe symptoms or react normally to
abdominal pain
69
Cont.
• While there is no evidence clearly evaluating
long-term outcomes of patients undergoing
incidental appendectomy with an asymptomatic
appendix, the risk of adhesions and future
complications after an appendectomy has been
suggested to be higher than the risk of future
appendicitis and increased economic costs
– For these reasons, an incidental appendectomy
is currently not advocated
70
Appendiceal tumors
• Appendiceal malignancies are extremely rare
– Primary appendiceal cancer is diagnosed in about
1% of appendectomy specimens
75
Lymphoma
• Lymphoma of the appendix is extremely
uncommon
77
Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Syndrome
• Result from peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal
mucinous neoplasms
79