The document outlines the legal actions available when a person dies due to a tort, specifically survival actions by the deceased's estate under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act and wrongful death actions by dependents under the Fatal Accidents Act. It details the provisions of these acts, including the types of damages recoverable and the limitations on bringing claims. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of timing and the requirement for dependents to prove their relationship to the deceased to succeed in their claims.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views10 pages
Unit 16 Death in Relation to Tort
The document outlines the legal actions available when a person dies due to a tort, specifically survival actions by the deceased's estate under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act and wrongful death actions by dependents under the Fatal Accidents Act. It details the provisions of these acts, including the types of damages recoverable and the limitations on bringing claims. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of timing and the requirement for dependents to prove their relationship to the deceased to succeed in their claims.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
University of Lusaka
School of Law
Unit 16 – Death in relation to a Tort
Introduction • When a person dies as a result of D’s tort, two potential actions are available: 1. An action by the person’s estate, under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions)Act Cap 74. • This is a ‘survival action’ whereby the deceased’s estate may bring an action on behalf of the deceased for the deceased’s own losses 2. An action by the person’s dependents, under the Fatal Accidents Act 1846 to 1908. • This is a 'wrongful death’ action, whereby the deceased’s dependents may sue on their own behalf for their loss of dependency. • The objective of the above Acts is to provide maintenance for those relatives who have been deprived of maintenance by the death. An Action by or Against the Estate of the Deceased • The Cap 74 Act reversed the harsh position at common law, which stated that the death of either party extinguished any existing cause of action in tort – actio personalis moritur cumpersona • The Act was passed, largely as a result of increasing motor traffic and resulting accidents, to provide generally for the survival of causes of action in tort. • Section 2(1) of the Act states that when the deceased dies, all causes of action vested in him(or subsisting against him) survive for the benefit (or burden) of his estate; • But, there are exceptions: • causes of action for defamation or seduction or for inducing one spouse to leave or remain apart from the other or to claims for damages on the ground of adultery. Cont’d • It is important to remember that this does not give the estate a cause of action for death itself. It simply means that the estate may pursue actions existing at the time of the victims death. • According to s. 2 (2) of Cap 74, where there is a valid claim for the benefit of the estate of the deceased, the damages granted shall: 1. not include any exemplary damages; 2. be calculated without reference to any loss or gain to his estate consequent on his death (if the death was due to the tort), except that a sum in respect of funeral expenses may be included. • In this case, damages shall not be calculated by making reference to the fact that the deceased had maybe prospects of getting a good paying job (loss) or that the estate has just received a huge funeral grant from the work place of the deceased (gain). Cont’d S.2 (3) You cannot maintain proceedings which were not pending at the death of the deceased or later than six months after his personal representative took out representation. s. 2 (4) is bringing out the fact that where the deceased’s estate is sued by a claimant, the timing of events is important. • Under s2 (4), where the deceased dies before or at the same time as the damage was suffered by C then an action is deemed to have subsisted against the deceased before his or her death. • Thus, if on facts similar to those of Donoghue v Stevenson, D, the negligent manufacturer of noxious ginger beer dies before the ultimate consumer, C, suffers damage from drinking it, C’s cause of action against D’s estate is preserved as it is regarded as arising before D’s death Cont’d • If the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence the damages are reduced according to the degree to which he was at fault. • Damages Recoverable: Claim for reasonable expectation for pecuniary benefit; future earnings and funeral expenses; • Note that The rights outlined above conferred by Cap 74 are in addition to and not in derogation of any rights conferred on the dependants of deceased persons by the Fatal Accidents Acts, 1846 to 1908, of the United Kingdom. The Dependents’ Action • At common law the death of another human being could not be complained of as an injury - See Baker v Bolton (1808) 170 ER 1033. • This harsh position was altered by the Fatal Accidents Act 1846 which was passed as a response to the increasing number of fatalities on railways leaving family members unsupported when the breadwinner died. • s. 2 of Fatal Accidents Act 1846, allows the dependants of the deceased person to recover by way of damages the value of their dependency, which is limited to the loss of the pecuniary benefit arising from the relationship of the dependants to the deceased, which they would have enjoyed had the deceased continued to live. Cont’d • To succeed with the claim, the court must be satisfied that the claimant was dependant on the deceased. • Only one action is to be brought in the name of a personal representative for actions surviving for the benefit of the deceased’s estate. • The action must be brought within three years after the date of death, or the date of the knowledge of the person for whose benefit the action is brought –s. 4 of The Law Reform (Limitation Of Actions, Etc.) Act • The action is brought by the personal representative on behalf of the relatives; but if there is no personal representative or if he does not commence an action within six months, any relative entitled to the protection of the Acts may sue in his own name on behalf of himself and the others. Cont’d • Further Reading: • Zambia State Insurance Corporation & ZCCM v Andrew Muchili (1988-89) Z.R. 149 • Bernard Chilunda v Zakaria Chinanzi (1979) Z.R. 195 (H.C.) • Henwood v Naoumoff (1966) Z.R. 78 (C.A.)
Betty Cranford v. Farnsworth & Chambers Company, Inc., A Corporation, Employer, and The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, A Corporation, Insurer, 261 F.2d 8, 10th Cir. (1958)