The document discusses various process scheduling algorithms, focusing on metrics such as CPU utilization, throughput, turnaround time, waiting time, and response time. It explains different scheduling techniques including Shortest Job First (SJF), preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling, and priority scheduling, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, it covers round-robin scheduling and its performance implications based on time quantum size.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views12 pages
OS_ch6 (1)
The document discusses various process scheduling algorithms, focusing on metrics such as CPU utilization, throughput, turnaround time, waiting time, and response time. It explains different scheduling techniques including Shortest Job First (SJF), preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling, and priority scheduling, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, it covers round-robin scheduling and its performance implications based on time quantum size.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12
PROCESS SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS
Name : Vaibhav Yashwant Abhang
Dept : CSE – B(105) 2nd Year CPU utilization – keep the CPU as busy as possible Throughput – # of processes that complete their execution per time unit Turnaround time – amount of time to execute a particular process Waiting time – amount of time a process has been waiting in the ready queue Response time – amount of time it takes from when a request was submitted until the first response is produced. (a process can produce some output fairly early, and can continue computing new results while previous results are being output to the user.) Max CPU utilization Max throughput Min turnaround time Min waiting time Min response time Process Burst Time P1 24 P2 3 P3 3 Suppose that the processes arrive in the order: P1 , P2 , P3 The Gantt Chart P1 for the scheduleP2 is: P3
0 24 27 30
Waiting time for P1 = 0; P2 = 24; P3 = 27
Average waiting time: (0 + 24 + 27)/3 = 17 Suppose that the processes arrive in the order P2 , P3 , P1 . The Gantt chart for the schedule is: P2 P3 P1
0 3 6 30
Waiting time for P1 = 6; P2 = 0; P3 = 3
Average waiting time: (6 + 0 + 3)/3 = 3 Much better than previous case. The effect short process behind long process Associate with each process the length of its next CPU burst. Use these lengths to schedule the process with the shortest time. Two schemes: nonpreemptive – once CPU given to the process it cannot be preempted until completes its CPU burst. preemptive – if a new process arrives with CPU burst length less than remaining time of current executing process, preempt. This scheme is know as the Shortest-Remaining-Time-First (SRTF). SJF is optimal – gives minimum average waiting time for a given set of processes. Process Burst Time P1 7 P2 4 P3 1 P4 4 SJF (non-preemptive) P1 P3 P2 P4
A priority number (integer) is associated with each process The CPU is allocated to the process with the highest priority (smallest integer highest priority). Equal- priority processes are scheduled in FCFS order. Preemptive nonpreemptive SJF is a priority scheduling where priority is the predicted next CPU burst time. (The larger the CPU burst, the lower the priority, and vice versa.) Problem Starvation – low priority processes may never execute. Solution Aging – as time progresses increase the The Average Waiting Time is 8.2 Milliseconds Each process gets a small unit of CPU time (time quantum), usually 10-100 milliseconds. After this time has elapsed, the process is preempted and added to the end of the ready queue. If there are n processes in the ready queue and the time quantum is q, then each process gets 1/n of the CPU time in chunks of at most q time units at once. No process waits more than (n-1)q time units. Performance q large FIFO q small q must be large with respect to context switch, otherwise overhead is too high. Process Burst Time P1 53 P2 17 P3 68 P4 24 The Gantt chart is: