ALL Secrets: Salah Mabruok Khalaf
ALL Secrets: Salah Mabruok Khalaf
By
1. Historical view 2. Epidemiology 3. Etiology 4. Pathogenesis 5. Classification 6. Diagnosis 7. Differential diagnosis 8. Prognostic factors 9. Management 10.Special conditions
I. Historical view
A. Discovery of Leukemia 1845: Craigie and Bennett described a case of suppuration of the blood, and referred to the disease as leukocythemia Also in 1845, Rudolph Virchow described a similar case and suggested the term leukemia. 1855, Ernst Neumann : the bone marrow is the origin of the blood abnormalities 1900: cytochemistry confirms 4 main cell types - acute and chronic myeloid; acute and chronic lymphoid 1976: FAB classification 1984: The DNA profiling technique was first reported by Alec Jeffreys at the University of Leicester in England, and hence molecular classifications of leukemia e.g. using PCR
I. Historical view
B. Treatment of Leukemia 1865: Lissauer reported response to Fowlers solution (arsenious oxide) 1943: Nitrogen mustard 1949: ACTH, cortisone and prednisone 1953: triple therapy consisting of 6-MP, antifolate and steroid 1959: Cyclophosphamide 1962: Vincristine 1962: St Jude initiated the concept of treatment phases 1967: Used increased dose of cranial radiation, 24cG, with IT MTX 1970: Formation of Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster group based on aggressive 8-drug therapy 1973: Janet Rowley discovered the Ph chromosome 1970s: T and B lymphocytes discovered, immunophenotyping of lymphoid neoplasms 1980s: bone marrow transplantation
II. Epidemiology
A. Frequency Estimated New Cancer Cases by Sex, US, 2009
Both sexes: 5,760 Male: 3,350 Female: 2,410
Women 713,220 27% Breast 14% Lung & bronchus 10% Colon & rectum 6% Uterine corpus 4% Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 4% Melanoma of skin 4% Thyroid 3% Kidney & renal pelvis 3% Ovary 3% Pancreas 22% All Other Sites
Leukemia
Pancreas All Other Sites
3%
3% 18%
Men 291,270
Leukemia
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct Esophagus Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Urinary bladder Kidney All other sites
4%
4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 23%
3% Leukemia 3% Uterine corpus 2% Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 2% Brain/ONS 23% All other sites
II. Epidemiology
B. Age:
Etiology
III. Etiology
He Smoke, He Radiate Chemical + virus
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
III. Etiology
2. Smoking
A. Childhood leukemia
It is unclear whether maternal or paternal cigarette smoking before or during pregnancy is a risk factor for developing childhood leukemia1 Some reported elevated risks associated with smoking were observed for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (odds ratio (OR) = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.12.0) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (OR = 1 .5; 95% Cl 1.12.1)2. Other reported that Cigarette smoking has been found to be weakly and inconsistently associated with ALL3.
B. Adult leukemia
1.Brondum et al. 1999; Shu et al. 1996 2.Ross et al (Am. J. Epidemiol 1991. 134, 9: 938-941) 3.Belson et al, Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jan;115(1):138
III. Etiology
3. Hematological disease
CML in lymphoblastic crisis 20-30% of blast crisis of CML Majority of these are of B-cell origin Bone marrow involvement in half of the cases Extramedullary involvement very common (lymph node being the commonest)
ii-Therapeutic:
In patients irradiated for ankylosing spondylitis Ionizing radiation used in the treatment of malignancies such as Hodgkin lymphoma has also been linked to the development of acute leukemia
iii- Diagnostic:
In radiologists (before current protective precautions). Intrauterine foetal exposure to low dose radiation (for X-ray pelvimetry)
III. Etiology
5. Chemicals
It is related to their ability to mutate or ablate the bone marrow stem cells. The best known are benzene, toluene, mustard gas and arsenic Acute leukemia develops 1 to 5 years after exposure It is often preceded by bone marrow hypoplasia, dysplasia, and pancytopenia The incidence is lower than that of AML
III. Etiology
5. Viruses
Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-1) adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma There is an association between Epstein-Barr virus and ALL-L3 (Burkitt leukemia).
Pathophysiology
Leukemogenesis
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene 2. Formation of chimeric transcription factor 3. Formation of a fusion protein with enhanced tyrosine kinase activity 4. Inactivation of tumor suppressor gene 5. Numeric Chromosomal Changes
Block of differentiation
Increased proliferation
Arrest of apoptosis
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene A-Translocation or chromosomal rearrangement
i. Abl v. LMO1 ii. c-myc vi. LMO2 iii. TAL1 vii. LYL1 iv. TAL2
B- Point mutation
RAS Gene Mutations
C. Amplification
i. c-myc ii. MYB Duplication
D. Inversion
HOX 11
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene ABL oncogene
ABL= Abelson Location: 9q34.1 Function of its protein : Nuclear c-ABL plays a major role in the regulation of cell death after DNA damage. Cytoplasmic c-ABL : Possible function in adhesion signaling as an efflux of c-ABL from nucleus to the cytoplasm. Autoregulatory mechanism: by amino-acid N terminal "cap" of the protein with its ability and sufficiency of its tyrosine kinase activity and the loss of this cap portion activates the oncogenic potential of cabl.
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
ABL oncogene
Activation: t(9;22)(q34;q11)/ALL --> BCR/ABL= Philadelphia chr Disease: Most often CD 10+ B-ALL; frequent CNS involvement Prognosis: Poor Oncogenesis Several signaling pathways are simultaneously activated 1- Activation of RAS pathway leading to a proliferative behavior. 2- Activation of PI-3K/Akt as well as JAK/STAT pathways is most likely responsible for the anti-apoptotic potential. 3- Provocation of cell adhesive abnormalities (via CRK-L, FAK) as well as abnormalities of cell migration (via CXCR-4).
Leukemic patient
Chr. 9
ABL
Chr. 22
BCR
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
ABL oncogene
IV- Leukemogenesis
1.
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene c-MYC
Activation t(8;14)(q24;q32) t(2;8)(p12;q24) t(8;22)(q24;q11) Disease: L3-ALL and Burkitt lymphoma (mature B malignant cell) Incidence: t(8;14) is described in 75-85% of the cases, t(2;8) in 5% t(8 ;22) in the remaining 10%; Oncogenesis:
In all these three translocations, the oncogene C-MYC is juxtaposed either with 1. The immunoglobulin heavy chain locus IGH (14q32), 2. The kappa light-chain locus IGK (2p12), or 3. The lambda light-chain locus IGL (22q11).
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
LMO 2 oncogene
LMO2 = LIM domain only 2 Location: 11p13 Function of its protein: Hematopoiesis They form a transcriptional complex: LMO2 has no direct evidence in DNA binding capacity but could act as a bridging molecule bringing together different DNA binding factors (TAL1, LDB1, E12/E47, GATA1) that are essential for hematopoiesis (e.g. in the erythroid complex).
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
LMO 2 oncogene Activation t(11;14)(p13;q11) Disease: Found in about 5% of T-cell ALL
Oncogenesis: Juxtaposition to the TCRD enhancer (14q11), is the main determinant for LMO2 activation in the majority of t (11; 14) (p13; q11) translocations.
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
NRAS point mutation
NRAS= neuroblastoma Rat Sarcoma (RAS) viral oncogene Location: 1p13 Function of its protein: It is GTP-binding proteins involved in signal transduction pathway from growth factor receptor to nucleus Disease: CML, ALL Incidence: 0-10%
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
Ras Pathway
Growth factor binds receptor Receptor exchanges GTP for GDP on Ras
Ras activated
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene to an oncogene
NRAS point mutation
Activation
Normal Ras gene (Proto-oncogene) DNA CCG GGC Mutated Ras gene (Oncogene) CAG GTC
RNA
GGC
GUC
Gly
Val
IV- Leukemogenesis
2- Activation of proto-oncogene by by Amplification MYB Duplication
Oncogenesis
Overexpressed or activated MYB suppresses normal differentiation and promotes leukemic transformation and proliferation.
IV- Leukemogenesis
1. Activation of proto-oncogene by inversion
HOX 11
Oncogenesis inv (7)(p15q34) places HOX11 cluster genes (7p15) under the influence of strong enhancers within the TCRB locus (7q34) resulting in its activation and promotes proliferation
IV- Leukemogenesis
2. Formation of chimeric transcription factor
Fusion gene
Fusion protein
IV- Leukemogenesis
2. Formation of chimeric transcription factor E2A
E2APBX1 Fusion Genes in Pre-B ALL E2AHLF Fusion Genes in Early Pre-B ALL MLLAF4 MLLENL MLLELL MLLCBP Fusion Gene in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Fusion Gene in Early Pre-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
CALMAF10
TELAML1 (ETV6RUNX1)
IV- Leukemogenesis
2. Formation of chimeric transcription factor
E2APBX1 Fusion
Formation: t(l;19)(q23;pl3) Disease: ALL, L1/L2 type; exceptionally found in L3-like ALL, T-ALL. Incidence: 5% of ALL, or 20% of pre B ALL Genes
E2A = TCF3 (transcription factor 3)
Location: 19p13 Protein: contains a homeodomain to binds to DNA; nuclear localisation; transcription regulation
IV- Leukemogenesis
2. Formation of chimeric transcription factor: MLL fusion gene
MLLAF4 fusion gene
Formation: t(4;11)(q21;q23) Disease: B-ALL (L1 or L2), biphenotypic AL, at times ANLL (M4/M5 types
maily) .
IV- Leukemogenesis
3. Formation of a fusion protein with enhanced tyrosine kinase activity
NUP214ABL1
Disease: T-ALL
IV- Leukemogenesis
4. Inactivation of tumor suppressor gene The p53 Tumor Suppressor
The cell growth arrest activity of p53 allows the activation of the DNA repair
system of the cell.
IV- Leukemogenesis
4. Numeric Chromosomal Changes in Childhood ALL
Hyperdiploidy:
Increase of total number of chromosome(>46)Bad prognosis Good prognosis Hypodiploidy: Decrease of total number of chromosome(<46)
Unfavorable prognosis
Classification
V- Classification
1. FAB classification(1976)
V- Classification
1. FAB classification The problem in that classification was differentiation between L1 and L2, so the FAB group, in 1981, introduced a scoring system to differentiate L1 from L2 as follow: Features used to classify: (1) Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio (2) Presence, prominence and frequency of nucleoli (3) Regularity of the nuclear membrane outline (4) Cell size Scoring system: Score of 0 to +2 indicates L1 Score of -1 to -4 indicates L2
V- Classification
1. WHO classification (2001): PRECURSOR LYMPHOID NEOPLASMS B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, NOS B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities
B lymphoblastic ABL1 B lymphoblastic B lymphoblastic B lymphoblastic B lymphoblastic B lymphoblastic B lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-
with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged with t(12;21)(p13;q22); TEL-AML1 with hyperdiploidy with hypodiploidy with t(5;14)(q31;q32); IL3-IGH with t(1;19)(q23;p13.3); E2A-PBX1
T lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
Diagnosis
VI- Diagnosis
1. Clinical pictures A. Bone Marrow failure:
Anemia Bleeding tendency Repeated infection CNS involvement
Lymphadenopathy, , when is it significant? Hepatosplenomegaly. Testicular involvement (painless and mostly Unilateral) Eye involvement. Renal involvement
Hyperleucocytosis
C.Others
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies i. Morphological examination ii. Cytochemistry iii. Immunophenotyping iv. Cytogenetic analysis v. Molecular genetic analysis vi. Other investigations
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies i. Morphological examination: Peripheral blood Smear
At least 200 cells should be counted in PB WBCs:
(60%), (25%) or N (15%) Blasts > 20 % of nucleated cell (NC) count Subleukemic leukemia Aleukemic leukemia
RBCs:
Anemia, 90% Reticulocytes are nearly always decreased
Platelets:
Thrombocytopenia in 90% of cases
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies i.Morphological examination: Bone marrow Ex
At least 500 cells should be counted in BM Hypercellular marrow in most of the cases Rarely hypocellular marrow Normal haematopoietic cells are reduced Blasts in excess of 20% establish the diagnosis of acute leukemia DD between myeloblast and lymphoblast
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies ii. Cytochemistry
NO CYTOCHEMICAL STAIN IS SPECIFIC FOR LYMPHOBLAST Myeloperoxidase (MPO): NEVER seen in lymphoblast -ve Non-specific esterase -ve Sudan black B +ve Periodic acid Schiff's (PAS) reaction: BALL=block-like positivity in L1 and L2 ONLY . +ve Acid phosphatase: in T-ALL and Hairy Cell Leukaemia
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies iii. Immunophenotyping (Flow cytometry): B-ALL
Stem cell
Pro-B
Common B
Pre-B
Mature B
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies iii. Immunophenotyping (Flow cytometry): T-ALL Pro T-ALL: +VE
CD7 Cyt CD3
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies iv. Cytogenetic analysis
Confirmation of diagnosis. Assessment of prognosis. Assessment of response to therapy. Detection of minimal residual disease
VI- Diagnosis
2. Laboratory studies iv. Other lab investigation: a-Biochemical tests b-Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination c.Surveillance bacterial cultures
VI- Diagnosis
2. Radiological studies Chest radiograph to look for mediastinal broadening specially in T-ALL
Differential Diagnosis
Anemia
In 80%, mild
Low in > 80% Common In 60% Without prophylaxis, CNS commonly involved
Occasional
In 50%
Common
Infrequent Usual and moderate
Present
Lymphoblast Scanty Coarse and dense Absent Monoclonal Usually +ve for malignancy
Reactive lymphocyte More amount Coarse and Fine Present Multiclonal -ve for malignancy
Prognosis
VII-Prognosis
Favorable prognostic factors in adult ALL:
Younger age (1-10) Female sex WBC count (50,000/L) Absence of blasts in CSF Common ALL Tel-AML1 translocation AND Hyperdiploidy ( >50) Absence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1) Early achievement of remission
VIII-Prognosis
Immunophenotype
B-cell : PreB-cell ALL T-cell : pre, Pro, and mature T-cell ALL
Management