Gender Perspectives 
Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: 
new evidence
This publication was prepared with support from the 
BRIDGE Project (No. GPO-A-00-03-00004-00), funded by 
the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), 
and implemented by the Population Reference Bureau 
(PRB) on behalf of the Interagency Gender Working Group 
(IGWG), a network comprising USAID Cooperating Agencies 
(CAs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the 
USAID Bureau for Global Health. 
The examples provided in this publication include experiences 
of organizations beyond USAID. This publication does not 
provide official USAID guidance but rather presents exam-ples 
of innovative approaches for integrating gender into 
reproductive health and HIV programs that may be helpful 
in responding to the Agency requirements for incorporating 
gender considerations in program planning. For official 
USAID guidance on gender considerations, readers should 
refer to USAID’s Automated Directive System (ADS). 
Copyright December 2009, Population Reference Bureau. 
All rights reserved.
Gender Perspectives 
Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: 
new evidence 
By 
Elisabeth Rottach 
Sidney Ruth Schuler 
Academy for Educational Development 
Karen Hardee 
Population Action International 
December 2009 
Prepared with support from the Interagency Gender Working Group, 
USAID, and Population Action International
Acknowledgments 
This publication would not have been possible without the 
work of the original Interagency Gender Working Group 
(IGWG) Task Force on Evidence that Gender Integration 
Makes a Difference to Reproductive Health Outcomes. The 
Task Force produced the 2004 “So What?” Report, whose 
authors included Carol Boender, Diana Santana, Diana 
Santillan, Margaret E. Greene, and two of the current authors, 
Karen Hardee and Sidney Schuler. 
Special thanks also to USAID’s Michal Avni and Patty 
Alleman, gender advisors in the Office of Population and 
Reproductive Health of the Global Health Bureau, for their 
support and commitment to this publication, and to Diana 
Prieto, gender advisor in USAID’s Office of HIV/AIDS for her 
invaluable review and suggestions. This publication also bene-fitted 
greatly from the comments of various external reviewers, 
including Dr. 'Peju Olukoya of the World Health Organization’s 
(WHO) Department of Gender, Women, and Health. Thanks 
also to other reviewers from WHO, including: Shelly Abdool, 
Heli Bathija, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Isabelle de Zoysa, 
Elise Johansen, Claudia Morrissey, Annie Portella, and Kirsten 
Vogelson. 
The authors are grateful to Charlotte Feldman-Jacobs and 
Marissa Yeakey of the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) for 
their editing, support, and encouragement in moving this 
important resource to its successful end. 
Elisabeth Rottach, Sidney Schuler, and Karen Hardee 
ii Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Table of Contents iii 
Table of Contents 
Executive Summary.................................................................................1 
1. Introduction........................................................................................4 
2. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies.....................................................12 
Case Study: Women’s Empowerment Model to Train 
Midwives and Doctors....................................................................18 
Case Study: PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Reproductive 
Health Program..............................................................................20 
3. Improving Maternal Health................................................................22 
Case Study: Involving Men in Maternity Care...............................25 
Case Study: Social Mobilization or Government Services.............27 
4. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs.....................................................30 
Case Study: Tuelimishane (“Let’s Educate Each Other”)..............38 
Case Study: Stepping Stones..........................................................40 
Case Study: Program H..................................................................42 
5. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health.............................44 
Case Study: Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra........52 
Case Study: Tostan Community-Based Education Program..........54 
Case Study: Intervention with Microfinance for AIDS 
and Gender Equity (IMAGE)..........................................................56 
6. Meeting the Needs of Youth...............................................................58 
Case Study: Ishraq (“Enlightenment”)..........................................62 
Case Study: First-time Parents.......................................................64 
7. Conclusions......................................................................................66 
Appendix ..............................................................................................70 
References............................................................................................84 
Glossary................................................................................................93
iv Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Executive Summary 1 
Executive Summary 
In 2004, the Interagency Gender Working 
Group (IGWG) published The “So What?” 
Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender 
Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to 
Outcomes. The 2004 report presented evidence 
of the value of integrating gender into programs 
for promoting positive reproductive health (RH) 
and gender outcomes. The purpose of this new 
2009 review is to assemble the latest data and 
update the evidence as to what difference it 
makes when a gender perspective is incorporat-ed 
into RH programs. 
The review focuses on five components of 
reproductive health programs, including inter-ventions 
related to: 
n Unintended pregnancy; 
n Maternal health; 
n HIV/AIDS and other STIs; 
n Harmful practices, including early marriage, 
female genital mutilation/cutting, and gen-der- 
based violence; and 
n Youth. 
The authors examined gender-related barri-ers 
to each component of reproductive health 
and the strategies undertaken by programs to 
address the barriers. Out of nearly 200 inter-ventions 
reviewed, 40 are included here as 
examples of programs that integrate gender to 
improve reproductive health outcomes. 
The interventions selected for inclusion 
were limited to those that have been evalu-ated— 
meaning they established criteria for 
assessment that were related to the goals of 
the intervention and followed an evaluation 
design—and that used accommodating or trans-formative 
approaches. The results of these pro-grams 
suggest that the field is evolving toward a 
deeper understanding of what gender equality 
entails and a stronger commitment to pursue 
this equality in reproductive health programs. 
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 
Several of the projects to reduce unintended 
pregnancy countered the traditional practice of 
aiming family planning (FP) services at women 
only; they encouraged husbands and other 
males to take more responsibility in this area. 
The strategies included enlistment of men who 
hold power, such as community or religious 
leaders, to support FP; influencing husbands to 
encourage their wives to use FP services; and 
providing a male-controlled contraceptive 
method. Other projects encouraged joint deci-sionmaking, 
shared responsibility in FP, and 
the institutionalization of gender into RH ser-vices. 
Addressing the balance of power between 
health-care service providers and female cli-ents, 
quality of care initiatives aimed to sensi-tize 
providers about the role of gender in their 
practice. 
Many of these programs took place in set-tings 
where women have little autonomy in their 
daily lives and little assertiveness in their rela-tionships. 
By using a gender perspective, unin-tended 
pregnancy can be addressed not only 
through programs targeting women, but also by 
targeting men, leaders, and decisionmakers. 
Improving Maternal Health 
A common feature of all the projects to 
improve maternal health was their recognition 
that decisions about ante- and post-natal care 
typically are not made by young pregnant 
women and new mothers, but more often by 
husbands or mothers-in-law. Particularly suc-cessful 
gender transformative approaches 
sought to create a supportive environment to 
improve women’s use of services by reaching 
out to husbands and mothers-in-law, in addi-tion 
to women. Several projects reached out to 
couples through counseling and information.
Through educational materials and couples’ 
counseling, health facilities broadened their 
reach to include husbands as well as pregnant 
women, addressing the particular roles that 
both partners can play in improving maternal 
health. Other projects aimed to improve the 
quality of antenatal care services and to change 
attitudes and practices among service providers 
with an emphasis on women’s rights to a basic 
standard of care and to be treated respectfully 
as clients. 
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 
Evaluations of a number of interventions to 
reduce HIV/AIDS and STIs provide strong evi-dence 
that addressing gender norms, promoting 
policies and programs to extend equality in 
legal rights, and expanding services for women 
and men can result in improved HIV/AIDS and 
gender outcomes. Some of the interventions 
are designed for groups that are particularly 
vulnerable to HIV/STIs; some attempt to reach 
clients through reproductive health services, 
members of particular demographic groups, or 
those who are in need of care and treatment 
for HIV. 
A common feature of successful programs 
was to stimulate dialogue on the relationship 
between gender norms and sexual behavior. 
These messages were communicated through a 
variety of channels, such as peer groups, work-shops, 
or mass media. Some programs used 
peer educators to deliver the messages, while 
others used health professionals, HIV/AIDS spe-cialists, 
or spokespersons and celebrities. 
Another approach to addressing HIV/AIDS was 
to include a gender perspective in promoting 
the use of health services. Sensitizing service 
providers to the gender components of risky 
behaviors and health-care seeking patterns 
helped to improve quality of care. 
These interventions demonstrated that 
strategies that incorporate gender in order to 
reduce HIV/AIDS and other STIs are becoming 
increasingly sophisticated in their approach to 
addressing gender dynamics. Many programs 
also focused on helping men identify and begin 
to question their gender roles, both the advan-tages 
conferred to them and the risks to which 
these roles expose them. 
Harmful Practices: 
Barriers to Reproductive Health 
Harmful practices, including early marriage, 
early childbearing, female genital mutilation/ 
cutting, and gender-based violence, play a sub-stantial 
2 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
role in undermining reproductive 
health, especially among young women. The 
harmful practices interventions reviewed were 
broad in focus, but shared common features. 
All employed gender transformative elements 
and sought to influence attitudes and behaviors 
of a range of community stakeholders, includ-ing 
women, men, parents, leaders, and entire 
communities. 
Linking social vulnerability and limited life 
options with vulnerability, life-skills education 
projects with unmarried adolescent girls aimed 
to increase their self-esteem and literacy. 
Interventions were often partnered with educa-tional 
modules on topics such as rights, prob-lem- 
solving, hygiene, and women’s health. 
Behavior change communication messages 
were disseminated through multiple channels, 
including community meetings, performances, 
and mass media activities. 
Meeting the Needs of Youth 
The interventions addressing youth focused on 
gender norms, providing information, and 
building skills related to sexual and reproduc-tive 
health (SRH). The themes of gender atti-tudes, 
partnerships, life skills, and participation 
of youth were common throughout many inter-ventions. 
Several sought to improve adolescent repro-ductive 
health by promoting gender equitable 
norms. The interventions themselves often com-prised 
life skills education and training, such as 
skills to provide opportunities for out-of-school 
youth. Other programs aimed to reach youth 
with RH information and services, empowering 
them to address their own needs. Some pro-grams 
sought support of communities for the 
activities, through village committees made up 
of a broad group of stakeholders. These commit-tees 
helped define and support the recruitment 
and program activities. Some used interven-tions 
at multiple community levels for policy, 
youth-friendly services, behavior change com-munication, 
and livelihood skills training.
Conclusions 
In the past five years there has been a clear 
increase in the evidence that integrating gender 
does improve reproductive health outcomes. 
Today, women and men are reaping the bene-fits 
of gender-integrated programming that uses 
a gender-transformative approach and stronger 
evaluations are measuring the effects. This new 
review makes an important contribution to the 
growing body of literature on gender-based 
approaches to policy and programming. The 
evidence presented here suggests that incorpo-rating 
gender strategies contributes to reducing 
unintended pregnancy, improving maternal 
health, reducing HIV/AIDS and other STIs, 
eliminating harmful practices, and meeting the 
needs of youth – all broadly included under the 
term “reproductive health.” 
In addition, this report generated several 
new findings: 
n Gender-integrated strategies are stronger 
and better evaluated than they were five 
years ago; 
n Incorporating a gender strategy leads to a 
better understanding of RH issues; 
n Formative research is critical; 
n Programs that integrate gender can benefit 
from working at multiple levels; and 
n Projects that integrate gender need to focus 
on costs, scale-up, and identifying policy 
and systemic changes required to “main-stream” 
gender. 
The way forward, focusing on well-evaluated 
projects that address policy, systems, and cost 
issues, scaling up gender integration, and 
addressing sustainability of equitable gender 
relations over time, will make important contri-butions 
to the health and lives of women, men, 
and families around the world. 
Executive Summary 3
1Introduction 
International initiatives to achieve reproduc-tive 
health (RH) outcomes—such as reducing 
unintended pregnancy, stopping the spread of 
HIV/AIDS, and improving maternal health—are 
increasingly recognizing that these outcomes 
are affected by gender, or the roles that are 
commonly assumed to apply to women and 
men (see the gender definition in the box 
below). This includes the roles that affect inti-mate 
and sexual relationships. 
Governments worldwide are working to 
achieve the Millennium Development Goals, 
including Goal 3: to promote gender equality 
and empower women. Most international donor 
agencies have embraced the idea that RH poli-cies 
and programs should support women’s 
empowerment and gender equity, and have 
included this in their goals and strategies. For 
example, the United States Agency for 
International Development (USAID) has long 
required that gender issues—both the potential 
effect of gender on proposed objectives and the 
impact of results on gender relations—be 
addressed within its projects, including health 
programs. USAID provides guidance on gender 
through its Automatic Directive System (ADS).1 
Since 1997, the Interagency Gender Working 
Group (IGWG), funded by USAID, has supported 
development of evidence-based materials and 
training for the implementation of programs that 
integrate gender into RH programs. The U.S. 
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief 
(PEPFAR), which is a key component of the 
Global Health Initiative, has provided technical 
assistance and guidance for the integration of 
gender into HIV prevention, treatment, and care 
programs, including the implementation of five 
PEPFAR gender strategies.2 
The United Nations (UN) and the World 
Health Organization (WHO) have encouraged 
“gender mainstreaming” for the last decade.3 
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, 
and Malaria is developing a gender strategy that 
promotes increased attention to gender in 
country grants and within the organization 
itself.4 The World Bank adopted a gender and 
development mainstreaming strategy in 2001 
and issued a revised Operational Policy and 
Bank Procedures statement in 2003.5 More 
recently, through the Gender Action Plan, it 
created a guiding framework to advance wom-en’s 
economic empowerment in order to pro-mote 
shared growth and MDG3.6 Many other 
bilateral and multilateral organizations also 
support policies and programs that promote 
gender equality. 
UNFPA’s State of the World Population 2008 
Report states that “Gender equality is a human 
right. In all cultures there are pressures 
towards and against women’s empowerment 
and gender equality.” The 2008 report goes on 
1 The ADS 200 and 300 series specify requirements for 
mandatory integration of gender considerations into plan-ning, 
44 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
programs implementation, and evaluation. The latest 
version can be found at www.usaid.gov/policy/ads. 
2 The five gender strategies include: 1) increasing gender 
equity; 2) addressing male norms and behavior; 3) reduc-ing 
violence and sexual coercion; 4) increasing income 
generation for women and girls; and 5) increasing women’s 
legal protection and property rights. 
3 UN, 2002, 2008; WHO, 2002, 2007. 
4 OSI and PAI are currently undertaking an analysis of evi-dence 
from gender programming to support implementa-tion 
of the Global Fund’s Gender Strategy. 
5 World Bank, 2003. 
6 World Bank, 2006. 
Gender refers to the different roles men and women play 
in society, and to the relative power they wield. While 
gender is expressed differently in different societies, in 
no society do men and women perform equal roles or 
hold equal positions of power. 
Riley, 1997: 1
Are interventions more strongly focused on transforming 
inequitable gender relations? Are interventions that incorporate 
gender evaluated using more rigorous approaches? 
Introduction 5 
to advocate culturally sensitive approaches in 
pursuing international development goals.7 
Consistent with this perspective, the authors 
have based this IGWG report on the premise 
that RH policies and programs should support 
social and culturally competent approaches in 
favor of women’s empowerment and gender 
equality, as a contextual factor influencing mul-tiple 
RH outcomes, and in pursuit of advancing 
human rights. 
Many international organizations and gov-ernments 
have increasingly focused on results 
and impact of programs and have sought to 
make investments that rest on evidence that 
gendered approaches actually improve out-comes. 
Until 2004, when the IGWG published 
The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether 
Integrating a Gender Focus Into Programs 
Makes a Difference to Outcomes, such evi-dence 
had not been brought together in a sys-tematic 
fashion. The purpose of this 2009 
review is to assemble the latest data and 
update the evidence as to what difference it 
makes when a gender perspective is incorpo-rated 
into RH programs. 
Background 
The 2004 “So What?” report used the term 
“reproductive health” in its broadest sense, as 
defined at the 1994 International Conference 
on Population and Development (ICPD), to 
cover interventions to reduce unintended preg-nancy 
and abortion; reduce maternal morbidity 
and mortality; and to combat the spread of STI/ 
HIV/AIDS. Interventions to improve quality of 
care were also assessed. Out of 400 interven-tions 
that were reviewed, 25 were found to 
have either accommodated gender differences 
or to have transformed gender norms to pro-mote 
equality. The report presented evidence 
of the value of integrating gender into pro-grams, 
for promoting both positive RH and gen-der 
outcomes. The report recommended: 1) 
stronger integration of gender in designing pro-gram 
interventions; and 2) more rigorous eval-uations 
of interventions that integrate gender.8 
Objective 
The current review, also supported by the 
IGWG,9 looks at new projects and research 
findings with the objective of determining 
whether progress has been made in the inter-vening 
years both in gender and RH program-ming 
and in its evaluation. 
None of the interventions reviewed in the 
2004 report are included here. In addition to 
assessing whether RH outcomes are enhanced 
with the integration of gender, the authors of 
this review explore the following two questions 
in this newer set of gendered programs: 
n Are the interventions more strongly focused 
on transforming inequitable gender relations 
rather than accommodating them? 
n Are interventions that incorporate gender 
evaluated using more rigorous approaches? 
Intended Audience 
This document is intended primarily for gender 
and health experts who design, implement, 
manage, and evaluate programs in developing 
countries. The findings on the effect of inte-grating 
gender are intended also for donors, 
policymakers, civil society, and advocacy 
groups to make the case for gender integration 
in health programs. 
Methods 
The authors identified documents for this 
review through online literature searches and 
by contacting key informants in the interna-tional 
reproductive health field. This report 
uses both published and unpublished docu-ments 
found in English, primarily evaluation 
reports, project summaries, and published jour- 
7 UNFPA 2008. 
8 Boender et al., 2004: 3. 
9 Population Action International funded co-author Karen 
Hardee’s time for this review.
nal articles. Databases of reproductive health, 
development, and academic literature were 
searched extensively.10 The authors also 
searched peer-review journals (e.g., Studies in 
Family Planning, Reproductive Health 
Matters, International Family Planning 
Perspectives, Population and Development 
Review, Violence Against Women, and The 
Lancet) and organization websites, such as 
Population Council, International Center for 
Research on Women (ICRW), the Interagency 
Youth Working Group, and the American Public 
Health Association (APHA). 
To extend the reach of the review beyond 
what is available online, experts and practitio-ners 
from organizations worldwide were con-tacted 
to locate additional program evaluation 
documents and identify other organizations 
and people involved in gender and reproductive 
health programs. Nearly 100 individuals span-ning 
40 organizations were contacted to 
request information about relevant interven-tions 
or suggest additional key informants. 
After completing the literature search, the 
authors reviewed approximately 200 project 
documents that have been published since the 
year 2000. This year was selected as the start of 
the search range in order to capture the most 
recent publications and minimize overlap with 
the previous “So What?” review; search results 
were filtered to exclude any publications 
reviewed at that time. The documents cover a 
range of reproductive health interventions, 
cross-sectoral development and life skills pro-grams 
with reproductive health components, 
and pilot and operations research projects. 
Criteria for Inclusion in the Review 
Interventions selected for this update had to 
meet the following criteria:11 
1. Does the intervention integrate gender? 
2. Has the intervention been evaluated? 
3. Does the intervention have measured repro-ductive 
health outcomes? 
Forty studies from developing countries 
were found to meet all three criteria.12 Only 
programs that used accommodating or transfor-mative 
approaches were included in this 
review. (See Appendix A.1 on page 71 for a 
table of the 40 projects, including their objec-tives, 
strategies, and reproductive health and 
gender outcomes.) 
Types of Gender Integration 
Strategies 
The IGWG has developed a continuum of the 
ways that gender is approached in projects (see 
Figure 1 below, the Gender Integration 
Continuum). This continuum13 categorizes 
approaches by how they treat gender norms 
and inequities in the design, implementation, 
and evaluation of programs or policy. 
The term “gender blind” refers to the 
absence of any proactive consideration of the 
larger gender environment and specific gender 
roles affecting program/policy beneficiaries. 
Gender blind programs/policies give no prior 
consideration for how gender norms and 
unequal power relations affect the achievement 
of objectives, or how objectives impact on gen-der. 
In contrast, “gender aware” programs/poli-cies 
deliberately examine and address the 
anticipated gender-related outcomes during 
both design and implementation. An important 
10 The complete list of databases searched includes: 
POPLINE, the Development Experience Clearinghouse, 
Expanded Academic, Interagency Youth Working Group, 
HRH Global Resource Center, PubMed, and the WHO 
Reproductive Health Library. All databases were searched 
with equal rigor and the same set of search terms. 
11 These are the same criteria that were used in the 2004 
report. 
12 A significant number of the final 40 projects were funded 
in whole or in part by USAID, who has also funded this 
review and publication. USAID projects frequently require 
evidence of program impact through structured evalua-tions. 
6 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
As a result, many USAID programs met the evalua-tion 
requirements for inclusion in this review as they were 
able to demonstrate the impact of their gender programs. 
13 This framework draws from a range of efforts that have 
used a continuum of approaches to understanding gender, 
especially as they relate to HIV/AIDS. See Geeta Rao 
Gupta, “Gender, Sexuality and HIV/AIDS: The What, The 
Why and The How” (Plenary Address at the XIII 
International AIDS Conference), Durban, South Africa: 
2000; Geeta Rao Gupta, Daniel Whelan, and Keera 
Allendorf, “Integrating Gender into HIV/AIDS Programs: 
Review Paper for Expert Consultation, 3–5 June 2002,” 
Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002; and WHO/ 
ICRW, “Guidelines for Integrating Gender into HIV/AIDS 
Programmes,” forthcoming.
FIGURE 1.1. The Gender Integration Continuum14 
prerequisite for all gender-integrated interven-tions 
is to be gender aware. 
In the graphic above, the circle depicts a 
specific program environment. Since programs 
are expected to take gender into consideration, 
the term “gender aware” is enclosed in an 
unbroken line, while the “gender blind” box is 
defined by a dotted, weak line. Awareness of 
the gender context is often a result of a pre-program/ 
policy gender analysis. “Gender 
aware” contexts allow program staff to con-sciously 
address gender constraints and oppor-tunities, 
and plan their gender objectives. 
Programs/policies may have multiple compo-nents 
that fall at various points along the con-tinuum, 
which is why multiple arrows exist. 
The IGWG emphasizes the following two 
gender integration principles: 
n First, under no circumstances should pro-grams/ 
policies adopt an exploitative 
approach since one of the fundamental 
principles of development is to “do no 
harm.” 
n Second, the overall objective of gender 
integration is to move toward gender trans-formative 
programs/policies, thus gradually 
challenging existing gender inequities and 
promoting positive changes in gender roles, 
norms, and power dynamics. 
Gender exploitative approaches, on the left 
of the continuum, take advantage of rigid gen-der 
norms and existing imbalances in power to 
achieve the health program objectives. While 
using a gender exploitative approach may seem 
expeditious in the short run, it is unlikely to be 
sustainable and can, in the long run, result in 
harmful consequences and undermine the pro-gram’s 
intended objective. 
Gender accommodating approaches, in the 
middle of the continuum, acknowledge the role 
of gender norms and inequities and seek to 
develop actions that adjust to and often com-pensate 
for them. While such projects do not 
actively seek to change the norms and inequi-ties, 
they strive to limit any harmful impact on 
gender relations. A gender accommodating 
approach may be considered a missed opportu-nity 
because it does not deliberately contribute 
to increased gender equity, nor does it address 
the underlying structures and norms that per-petuate 
gender inequities. In situations where 
gender inequities are deeply entrenched and 
pervasive in a society, however, gender accom-modating 
approaches often provide a sensible 
first step to gender integration. As unequal 
power dynamics and rigid gender norms are 
Introduction 7 
14 While this gender continuum framework has been adopted 
by the IGWG and applied to USAID’s work, other organiza-tions 
may use different gender frameworks; see, for exam-ple, 
the World Health Organization gender strategy at 
http://www.who.int/gender/mainstreaming/strategy/en/ 
index.html
recognized and addressed through programs, a 
gradual shift toward challenging such inequities 
may take place. 
Gender transformative approaches, at the 
right end of the continuum, actively strive to 
examine, question, and change rigid gender 
norms and imbalance of power as a means of 
reaching health as well as gender-equity objec-tives. 
Gender transformative approaches 
encourage critical awareness among men and 
women of gender roles and norms; promote the 
position of women; challenge the distribution 
of resources and allocation of duties between 
men and women; and/or address the power 
relationships between women and others in the 
community, such as service providers or tradi-tional 
leaders. 
[T]he field is evolving toward a deeper understanding of 
what gender equality entails and a stronger commitment 
to pursue this equality in health programs. 
A particular project may not fall neatly 
under one type of approach, and may include, 
for example, both accommodating and transfor-mative 
elements. Also, while the continuum 
focuses on gender integration goals in the 
design/planning phase, it can also be used to 
monitor and evaluate gender and health out-comes, 
with the understanding that sometimes 
programs result in unintended consequences. 
For instance, an accommodating approach may 
contribute to a transformative outcome, even if 
that was not the explicit objective. Conversely, 
a transformative approach may produce a reac-tion 
that, at least temporarily, exacerbates gen-der 
inequities. Monitoring and evaluating 
gender outcomes against the continuum allows 
for revision of interventions where needed. 
Accommodating or 
Transformative? 
In some cases a particular intervention strategy 
may be accommodating in one context and 
transformative in another, depending on the 
nature of the intervention and how it is imple-mented. 
For example, a project may work with 
male power holders such as local religious lead-ers 
to try to enlist them in encouraging (or to 
stop opposing) contraceptive use among 
women. This could be seen as an accommoda-tion 
to the gender status quo in which males 
holding power act as gatekeepers. It could also 
be seen as transformative if the leaders are 
explicitly engaged to question or change their 
traditional role in regard to family planning 
communication. 
Transformative strategies may experience 
greater challenges to implementation in that 
they explicitly address the structural underpin-nings 
of gender inequality in social systems, 
and therefore are likely to encounter resis-tance. 
For the same reason, however, they have 
the potential to bring about long-term and 
more sustainable benefits for women and men. 
Programs and policies may transform gen-der 
relations through: 
n Encouraging critical awareness of gender 
roles and norms; 
n Empowering women and/or engaging men, 
thus achieving gender equality and health 
equity objectives; or 
n Examining, questioning, and changing the 
imbalance of power, distribution of resourc-es, 
and allocation of duties between women 
and men. 
A majority of the interventions in this 
review employ transformative approaches. This 
suggests that the field is evolving toward a 
deeper understanding of what gender equality 
entails and a stronger commitment to pursuing 
equality in health programs. 
8 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Intervention Evaluations 
The interventions selected for inclusion in this 
report were limited to those that have been 
evaluated – those that established criteria for 
assessment that were related to the goals of the 
intervention and followed an evaluation design. 
The evaluations are of varying quality and thor-oughness, 
employing methods ranging from 
randomized-control trials (RCT) to post-test-only 
designs, a few of which used qualitative 
methods exclusively (see Table 1.1).15 
Countries Represented 
Twenty-five countries were represented in the 
interventions to improve reproductive health 
outcomes by integrating gender. Most interven-tions 
were located in Africa (10), followed by 
Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean (6 
each), the Near East (2) and Other (1). Some 
countries had multiple interventions. Two 
countries, India and South Africa, were home 
to the most interventions (eight and seven 
interventions, respectively). 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
The outcomes highlighted in this report cover a 
range of indices in reproductive health and 
family planning, as well as broader indicators 
such as age at marriage and knowledge about 
sexual and reproductive health, as well as indi-cators 
of gender outcomes (see Tables 1.3 and 
1.4). The authors have limited this review to 
programs with measured reproductive health 
outcomes, although broader indicators and gen-der 
outcomes are included when available. 
Organization of the Report 
This report is divided into seven chapters: an 
introduction; four chapters corresponding to 
reproductive health issues (unintended preg-nancies; 
maternal health; HIV/AIDS and other 
sexually transmitted infections (STIs); and 
harmful practices); a chapter on meeting the 
needs of youth (due to the large number of pro-grams 
targeted to this vulnerable and demo-graphically 
important group, as well as the 
Table 1.1 
Table 1.2 
special strategies needed to reach youth); and, 
finally, a conclusion. Each chapter contains at 
least two detailed case studies, highlighting 
particularly noteworthy projects with strong 
evaluations and transformative approaches. 
Noteworthy projects that had less information 
available were included in the summary within 
each chapter. 
Of the 40 programs that met the criteria for 
inclusion, 18 are cross-cutting interventions, 
addressing two or more RH issues. In these 
cases, the programs are categorized in the 
chapter on the RH issue they most directly 
address. In addition, many of the interventions 
included in this report related to working with 
Introduction 9 
15 See the Glossary, page 93, for definitions of evaluation and 
research methodology terms. 
Methodologies Used in Evaluation of Gender Integrated 
Interventions 
Methodology Number of studies 
Quantitative (primarily) 37 
Experimental design 5 
Quasi-experimental design 17 
Non-experimental design 15 
Qualitative (exclusively) 3 
Countries Included in the Analysis of Outcomes Related to 
Gender-integrated Interventions 
Africa (10) Asia (6) LAC (6) Near East (2) Other (1) 
Ethiopia (3) Afghanistan Bolivia Egypt (2) Georgia 
Ghana Bangladesh Brazil Jordan 
Guinea Cambodia Ecuador 
Kenya (2) India (8) El Salvador 
Liberia Nepal Nicaragua 
South Africa (7) Philippines Peru 
Tanzania (2) 
Senegal 
Sudan 
Uganda 
Note: some programs and evaluations were conducted in multiple countries. Some 
programs were implemented in multiple countries without all countries being included 
in the evaluations. Only countries that had evaluations are included in this table.
Table 1.3 
Number of Interventions Reporting Selected* Reproductive Health Outcomes** 
Reproductive Health Issue Outcomes Number of Interventions 
Reducing Unintended Pregnancy 
Greater contraceptive knowledge 11 
Greater contraceptive use 11 
Greater awareness of fertility 2 
Increase in communication and joint decision-making with partner about contraception 2 
Improved provider clinical skills and knowledge of FP methods and STI detection/treatment 1 
Improving Maternal Health 
Increase in use of skilled pregnancy care 3 
Reduced case fatality rate 1 
Increase in screening of pregnant women for Syphilis 1 
Increase in women’s emergency obstetric care needs being met 1 
Greater knowledge of warnings signs in pregnancy 1 
Increase in awareness of prenatal care 1 
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 
Greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and prevention 7 
Greater condom use: 
At last sex 3 
With primary partner 4 
Increase in visits to centers that provide HIV/AIDS and STI services 5 
Lower reported STI symptoms 2 
Greater knowledge of STI symptoms 1 
Increased exclusive breastfeeding 1 
Greater receipt & ingestion of nevirapine 1 
Greater CD4 testing 1 
Eliminating Harmful Practices 
Decrease in belief that IPV/SV is justified under some circumstances 3 
Greater knowledge of IPV/SV resources 2 
Decrease in incidence of violence 3 
Increased community action and protest against harmful practices 2 
Attitudes toward IPV/SV 4 
Decrease in risk of IPV/SV 1 
Decrease in controlling behavior by intimate partner 1 
Increased uptake of RH services 1 
Greater knowledge of harmful consequences of FGM/C and advantages of not cutting girls 3 
Decrease in belief that FGM/C is necessary 2 
Increase in number of men who marry uncircumcised girls 1 
Decrease in FGM/C incidence 2 
Increase in age at marriage 1 
Increase in interval between marriage and first birth 1 
Greater knowledge of risks of early childbearing 1 
Fewer adolescent pregnancies 1 
Fewer adolescent marriages 1 
Meeting the Needs of Youth 
Greater sexual and reproductive health knowledge 4 
Increase in decision-making ability related to: 
Condom use 2 
Sex 1 
Increase in age at sexual debut 1 
*Additional RH outcomes were measured beyond those listed here. Please see the program reports for additional information. 
**Interventions addressing more than one reproductive health outcome are listed more than once. 
10 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Introduction 11 
men. These interventions are included under 
each of the main chapters because the construc-tive 
engagement of men and boys is an integral 
part of integrating gender into programs. 
Each chapter begins with a summary of the 
issues surrounding the reproductive health out-come 
discussed in the section. Next, summa-ries 
of interventions and studies are presented, 
highlighting each project’s gender approach as 
well as evaluation design. At the end of each 
chapter, readers will find expanded case studies 
that highlight selected interventions, including 
their gender integration strategies and evalua-tions. 
Information on costs has been included 
where available. Some of the program areas 
had more intervention examples than others 
and the amount of detail on each of the meth-odologies 
and approaches of the interventions 
is limited by the quality of description found in 
reports and communications. 
The 2004 “So What?” report, reflecting the 
state of the field at the time, did not have sepa-rate 
chapters on harmful practices or youth. 
Interventions in these areas certainly existed, 
but most had not been evaluated, or had not 
been evaluated extensively enough to be 
included in the review. Also, the 2004 report 
had a separate chapter on gender in quality of 
care initiatives. Quality of care has increasingly 
been incorporated as a standard component of 
RH programming; therefore, quality of care ini-tiatives 
are not highlighted separately here. 
Table 1.4 
Number of Interventions Reporting Selected* Gender 
Outcomes** 
Gender Outcomes Number of Interventions 
Increased partner communication about 
reproductive health or family planning 11 
Increased equitable gender attitudes and beliefs 9 
Women's increased self-confidence, self-esteem 
or self-determination 5 
Women's increased participation in the community 
and development of social networks 3 
Higher scores on an empowerment scale for women 3 
Increased support (emotional, instrumental, family 
planning, or general support) from partners or community 2 
Increased life and social skills 2 
Women's increased decision-making power 1 
Higher formal educational participation for women or girls 1 
Women's increased mobility 1 
Improved gender relations within the community 1 
Women more articulate in discussing IPV/SV and RH 1 
Decreased tolerance for kidnapping of girls 1 
*Additional gender outcomes were measured beyond those listed here. Please see the 
program reports for additional information. 
**Interventions addressing more than one gender outcome are listed more than once.
Reducing Unintended 
Pregnancies 
Unintended pregnancy is a critical issue 
throughout the world. Data from 53 coun-tries 
indicate that one in seven married and 
one in 13 never-married women have an unmet 
need for contraception16 and are thus at risk of 
unintended pregnancy. Unmet need is highest 
in sub-Saharan Africa, where one in four mar-ried 
women have an unmet need for contracep-tion. 
In the regions of Latin America and the 
Caribbean, North Africa, West and Central 
Asia, and South and Southeast Asia, unmet 
need is lower, but still significant.17 
Numerous gender-related barriers that con-tribute 
to unintended pregnancy have been 
identified, some at the institutional and policy 
level, and others at the levels of the family and 
community. Fertility control has often been 
seen as women’s domain, and women are often 
construed as targets of family planning (FP) 
programs rather than beneficiaries of reproduc-tive 
health care. As a result, programs have 
been slow to engage men and address gender-based 
inequities. Men’s power over women in 
the household also has implications for contra-ceptive 
use and reducing unintended pregnan-cies. 
Women are often in a weak position in 
negotiating the timing and circumstances of 
sexual intercourse.18 The perception that 
women are responsible for FP may mean that 
women without their own sources of income 
are unable to use family planning services 
unless they are free of charge.19 Women are 
often blamed for unplanned pregnancies20 even 
though men often play important roles in regu-lating 
2 
12 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
women’s access to RH services through 
control of finances, women’s mobility, means of 
transportation, and health care decisions.21 
Women in some settings would rather undergo 
abortions than risk repeated conflicts with 
their husbands over contraceptive use.22 
Women are disadvantaged by unequal power 
relations outside the home as well as within it. 
Gender power imbalances in client-provider 
relationships often are exacerbated by dispari-ties 
in social status and education, which are 
likely to be greater when the client is female 
and the provider is male.23 This may encourage 
providers to behave in an authoritarian fashion 
that often results in compliance and passivity 
from their clients.24 Regardless of the sex of the 
provider, female clients often fail to ask ques-tions 
or voice concerns that may affect the suc-cess 
of their family planning use.25 
Additionally, gender norms may discourage 
16 Women who prefer to space or limit births but are not 
using any form of contraception are considered to have 
unmet need for family planning. 
17 Sedgh et al., 2007. Based on data from Demographic and 
Health Surveys (DHS). 
18 Schuler et al., 1994. 
19 Schuler et al., 2002b. 
20 Hoang et al., 2002. 
21 Robey et al., 1998; Goldberg and Toros, 1994. 
22 Biddlecom and Fapohunda, 1998; Schuler et al., 1994. 
23 Upadhyay, 2001. 
24 DiMatteo, 1994; Schuler et al., 1994. 
25 Schuler et al., 1985; Schuler and Hossain, 1998. 
Program Country 
Male Motivation Campaign Guinea 
Together for a Happy Family Jordan 
Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning El Salvador 
Reproductive Health Awareness Philippines 
PRACHAR India 
REWARD Nepal 
CASE STUDY: Women’s Empowerment Model to Afghanistan 
Train Midwives and Doctors 
CASE STUDY: PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Bolivia 
Reproductive Health Program
Table 2.1 
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 13 
women, especially young women, from appear-ing 
to know or acquiring knowledge about sex-ual 
matters or suggesting contraceptive use.26 
At the same time, the social construction of 
masculinity may contribute to male risk–taking 
in the form of unprotected sex and expecta-tions 
to prove sexual potency.27 
Interventions 
Several of the projects reviewed both for this 
chapter and for the chapter on maternal mor-tality 
and morbidity countered the traditional 
practice of aiming FP services at women only; 
they encouraged husbands and other males to 
take more responsibility in this area. The strat-egies 
included enlistment of people who hold 
power—for example, religious leaders and, in 
one case, the royal family—to support FP; 
influencing husbands to encourage their wives 
to use FP services; and providing a male-con-trolled 
contraceptive method. Other projects 
encouraged joint decisionmaking and shared 
responsibility in FP and the institutionalization 
of gender into RH services. 
The two projects selected as case studies 
reduce unintended pregnancy through a gen-der- 
transformative approach. They are the 
Women’s Empowerment Model to Train 
Midwives and Doctors and the PROCOSI 
Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health 
Program (see pp. x and x). The Women’s 
Empowerment Model was used to train mid-wives 
and doctors on clinical skills in family 
planning, particularly IUD insertion, and to 
increase family planning knowledge in 
Afghanistan. The PROCOSI gender-sensitive 
program adopted a long-term perspective and 
worked with a large number of institutions in 
Bolivia to integrate gender into reproductive 
health services. 
Of the other six interventions that met the 
criteria for this review, the first four described 
here aimed to meet the RH goal of reducing 
unintended pregnancy through constructive 
engagement of men. Their approaches range 
from accommodating to transformative, and 
sometimes encompass elements of both. 
Table 2.1 lists the key gender strategies 
used to reduce unintended pregnancy in the 
projects reviewed. 
Male Motivation Campaign28 
Country: Guinea 
Implementing organizations: Johns Hopkins University 
Center for Communication Programs (JHU/CCP) and the 
Guinean Ministry of Health 
Through constructive engagement of men, this 
intervention sought to increase knowledge and 
use of quality health care services and the 
adoption of positive health practices in Guinea. 
The first phase of this campaign consisted of 
advocacy with religious leaders—a strategy that 
falls somewhere between gender accommodat-ing 
and transformative. In the context of a 
patrilineal and male-dominated society in 
Guinea, the program accommodated existing 
power structures by reaching out to male reli-gious 
leaders, knowing that empowering reli-gious 
leaders would help to ensure social 
support for family planning. In the second 
phase, the project utilized multimedia interven-tions 
to educate married men about FP and 
persuade them to talk with their wives and 
encourage them to use FP services. Engaging 
community men and those in positions of lead-ership 
has the potential to transform gender 
relations to a greater equity by expanding lim- 
26 Bezmalinovic et al., 1997; Population Council, 2000. 
27 UNFPA, 2008. 
28 Blake and Babalola, 2002. 
Strategies Used in Programs to Reduce Unintended 
Pregnancy 
Improving male partners’ accurate knowledge about RH and FP; and 
Encouraging male partners to take more responsibility for FP 
Encouraging joint decision-making and shared responsibility for FP 
Institutionalization of gender into NGO RH services, including accreditation 
Advocacy with religious leaders and policymakers 
Integration with non-health development activities (water and sanitation) 
Use of established male networks to diffuse information, refer to services, 
and expand method choice 
Empowering female providers 
Increasing gender awareness and sensitivity of health providers 
Empowering women and girls
ited traditional male roles to include knowledge 
of, and engagement in, FP/RH. In addition to 
the two primary audiences, the campaign also 
addressed women of reproductive age and ser-vice 
providers. The project covered a relatively 
large population; for example, about 30,000 
people attended community mobilization 
events surrounding 30 rural health centers. 
The evaluation of the Male Motivation 
Campaign in Guinea had two components: a 
panel study with religious leaders and a popula-tion- 
based study with men and women of 
reproductive age. In the first component, 98 
religious leaders were interviewed at two points 
in time. In the second component, a sample of 
1,045 men and women who were interviewed 
in the 1999 Guinea Demographic and Health 
Survey were re-interviewed. Following the 
intervention, involvement in advocating for 
modern family planning methods became more 
widespread among religious leaders and fewer 
believed that FP methods were prohibited by 
Islam. Multiple regression analysis controlling 
for confounding effects of prior ideation showed 
that campaign exposure was associated with 
considerable and significant change in an “ide-ation 
index” measuring awareness of and 
approval of FP; discussion of FP with spouse, 
friends, or relatives; and spousal approval of FP. 
Actual use of contraception, however, did not 
increase significantly among women and stag-nated 
among men. 
Together for a Happy Family29 
Country: Jordan 
Implementing organizations: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg 
School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs 
(JHU/CCP) in collaboration with the Jordanian National 
Population Committee 
This project engaged men by encouraging cou-ple 
communication and joint decision-making. 
The project worked with religious leaders and 
the royal family in Jordan, where many people 
were unaware that Islam permits use of modern 
FP methods. In Jordan, husbands’ opposition to 
family planning, preferences for large families, 
perceived religious prohibitions, and health 
concerns all limit the use of modern FP meth-ods. 
For a two-year period beginning in March 
1998, national-level, multi-media behavior 
change communication messages were used to 
enlist men in making informed decisions with 
their wives to use family planning. The premise 
of the project was that highly-respected people 
would be able to influence men effectively. 
Project researchers, with staff from the 
Jordanian Department of Statistics, compared 
the project’s 1996 knowledge, attitudes, and 
practices (KAP) survey results with findings 
from the 2001 Men’s Involvement in 
Reproductive Health Survey (MIRHS) following 
the campaign. The analysis showed improved 
knowledge and substantially more positive atti-tudes 
14 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
among both men and women regarding 
specific modern FP methods. The majority of 
both men and women reported in 2001 that 
they decided together on the number of chil-dren 
they planned to have, compared with 
about one-third who said they decided together 
in 1996. Similarly, in 2001 nearly 80 percent of 
MIRHS respondents said that husbands and 
wives share responsibility for avoiding 
unwanted pregnancies. Survey respondents 
were given a list of topics from which they 
were to rank issues discussed and actions taken 
as a result of exposure to the campaign. 
Respondents ranked discussing issues with 
spouses and sharing decision-making as the top 
actions taken. They also included treating sons 
and daughters equitably and adopting a FP 
method. Comparison of the 1996 and 2001 sur-veys 
showed a decrease in ideal family size 
from 4.3 to 3.8. While it is not possible to attri-bute 
these changes entirely to the “Together for 
a Happy Family” campaign, the magnitude of 
the changes is notable. 
Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 30 
Country: El Salvador (rural) 
Implementing organizations: The Institute for Reproductive 
Health (IRH) of Georgetown University, the El Salvadoran 
Ministry of Health, and Project Concern International, with its 
local El Salvador affiliate PROCOSAL (Programas 
Comunitarias para El Salvador) 
This was a pilot project carried out in 13 small 
villages in rural El Salvador. The objective was 
to integrate family planning—specifically 
increasing male involvement in family planning 
29 JHUCCP, 2003. 
30 Lundgren et al., 2005.
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 15 
and use—into a water and sanitation program. 
It sought to facilitate couple communication 
and joint decision-making regarding family 
planning. The initiative also aimed to integrate 
women into water committees which had previ-ously 
been monopolized by men. Results of 
interviews with men and women defined as 
having unmet need indicated that some men 
were unwilling to use modern contraceptive 
methods, or to have their wives use them, both 
because of concern about side effects and 
because they worried that their wives might be 
unfaithful. The researchers found that the prac-tice 
of periodic abstinence was common, but 
that most people could not correctly identify 
their fertile days.31 The project sought to use 
networks established around issues men cared 
about and in which they were already involved. 
These networks were used to diffuse informa-tion, 
facilitate referrals, and expand method 
choice (with an emphasis on the Standard Days 
Method™ or SDM). The project creatively used 
a metaphor to promote family planning: fertile 
cycles of the land were equated with the fertile 
cycles of women. Moreover, the incorporation 
of men into FP decisionmaking was construed 
as a natural parallel to including women in 
decisionmaking in development efforts. Thus, 
gender-equity strategies from a project in the 
environmental sector were imported into a FP 
initiative, furthering the objective of reducing 
unintended pregnancy as well as promoting 
gender equality. 
The evaluation of this project employed 
community-based surveys of individuals of 
reproductive age prior to the start (January 
2001) and at the end of the project (September 
2002). Logistic regression analyses showed sub-stantial 
differences in knowledge, attitudes, and 
behavior after the FP intervention. 
Communication between partners also 
increased. The differences between participants 
and non-participants were small, suggesting a 
community-level effect. The researchers attri-bute 
the program’s success to the way the 
intervention was integrated into an already 
successful water and sanitation project 
equipped with its own outreach infrastructure 
for involving many men and women in the 
community.32 
Reproductive Health Awareness (RHA)33 
Country: Philippines 
Implementing organizations: KAANIB in the Philippines; 
evaluation conducted in collaboration with FRONTIERS/ 
Population Council, the Institute for Reproductive Health 
(IRH, Georgetown University), and the Research Institute for 
Mindanao Culture (RIMCU at Xavier University). 
In this male engagement intervention, KAANIB 
worked with small farmers and agrarian reform 
beneficiaries and implemented the RHA inter-vention 
through its trained volunteer couple 
members. The RHA project sought to promote 
constructive engagement of men in reproduc-tive 
health by improving awareness, knowledge, 
health-seeking behavior, and couples communi-cation 
on RH. The project used a couples 
approach, but emphasized husbands’ needs and 
involvement in RH. The volunteer couples were 
trained on four topics: fertility and body aware-ness; 
family planning; RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS; 
and couples communication on RH. These top-ics 
had been identified as gaps in knowledge 
during a 1997 baseline survey of male involve-ment 
conducted by the FRONTIERS Project 
and IRH/Georgetown. 
The evaluation included a pre- and post-test 
nonequivalent control group design. At pre-test 
(prior to the RHA intervention), 210 couples 
who were members of KAANIB and 249 couples 
from the comparison areas were interviewed. 
At post-test, 183 of the original 210 couples in 
KAANIB areas were found and interviewed, as 
well as 217 couples in the comparison areas. In 
the intervention area, significant positive 
changes were found in supportive attitudes by 
husbands toward RH, and in husband-wife 
communication, as reported by husbands and 
their partners. Knowledge and awareness about 
anatomy and physiology, fertility, family plan-ning 
methods, and STI increased significantly 
among women but not among men. No changes 
were found in family planning use. Statistically 
significant improvements were found among 
men in the program area regarding communi-cation 
with spouses on the fertile period and 
use of family planning. The intervention dem-onstrated 
the feasibility of using couples as RH 
educators in the community. 
31 Lundgren et al., 2005. 
32 Lundgren et al., 2005. 
33 Palabrica-Costello, 2001.
PRACHAR34 
Country: India 
Implementing organizations: Pathfinder International with 30 
local NGOs in Bihar, India. 
The PRACHAR project aimed to raise aware-ness 
about FP and the healthy timing and spac-ing 
of pregnancy among young people and 
community leaders. The project worked with 
married and unmarried young people, both 
male and female, as well as with mothers-in-law 
and other family members of young couples 
and respected community elders and commu-nity 
leaders. The three-year project that began 
in 200135 worked in 452 villages and provided 
information on RH/FP issues to over 90,000 
adolescents and young adults and over 100,000 
parents and other adults in the communities. 
Educational messages regarding the risks and 
disadvantages of early marriage and childbear-ing, 
and the benefits of delaying and spacing 
births, were tailored for these different audi-ences. 
The project also provided contraceptives 
and worked with community-based practitio-ners 
to increase their skills in providing basic 
maternal and child health and RH/FP services. 
The transformative approach focused on 
empowering girls and women, increasing men’s 
knowledge and sensitization to FP, and on open 
communication between partners on issues 
related to childbearing, family size, and use of 
contraception. The PRACHAR project’s evalua-tion 
relied on project monitoring data and pre-/ 
post surveys in intervention and control areas 
to assess impact. Key RH results included: 
n The percentage of the population (all 
respondents) who said they believed that 
contraception is both necessary and safe 
increased from 38 percent to 81 percent. 
Among unmarried adolescents, this figure 
increased from 45 percent to 91 percent. 
n The percentage of recently married couples 
using contraceptives to delay their first 
child more than tripled, from five percent to 
20 percent, and the interval between mar-riage 
16 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
and first birth increased from 21 
months to 24 months. 
n The percentage of recently married contra-ceptive 
adopters who began using contra-ception 
within the first three months of the 
consummation of marriage increased dra-matically, 
from less than one percent to 21 
percent. 
n The percentage of first-time parents who used 
contraception to space their second child 
increased from 14 percent to 33 percent. 
34 Information from Wilder et al.. 2005. See also, E.E. Daniel 
et al., 2008. 
35 This section relates to data from Phases I and II of the 
PRACHAR project. As this publication goes to press, the 
project is currently in Phase III.
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 17 
REWARD36 
Country: Nepal 
Implementing organizations: The Centre for Development and 
Population Activities (CEDPA), The Nepal Red Cross Society 
(NRCS), and the Centre for Research on Environmental 
Health and Population Activities (CREHPA). 
The NRCS, in collaboration with CREHPA, 
implemented the REWARD (Reaching and 
Enabling Women to Act on Reproductive 
Health Decisions) Project to strengthen wom-en's 
capabilities for informed decisionmaking 
to prevent unintended pregnancy and improve 
reproductive health in three districts of Nepal. 
The project worked with Village Development 
Committees and supported a network of more 
than 700 community-based staff and volunteers 
engaged in delivering reproductive health infor-mation 
and methods (pills, condoms, and 
Depo-Provera) at the community level. It aimed 
both to provide services and referrals and to 
create an enabling environment to strengthen 
women's informed RH decisionmaking. Two 
components of this strategy were educational 
sessions to increase gender awareness among 
program managers and service providers, and 
encouragement of women’s participation at all 
levels of the NRCS. The project also created 
women-only community action groups (CAGs) 
that met monthly to discuss reproductive 
health issues. At the program’s peak, there 
were 495 active CAGs with nearly 10,000 
members. 
After the REWARD project in Nepal was 
phased out in 2002, CEDPA conducted an eval-uation 
that included two components: 1) an 
assessment of project performance based on 
secondary data; and 2) a population-based sam-ple 
survey in one district (security concerns 
prevented a more extensive survey). 
Comparison of baseline and endline data sug-gested 
increases in contraceptive prevalence 
and “couple years of protection” (CYP); 
increased popularity of reversible contracep-tives 
such as DMPA, condoms, and pills; and 
increased use of maternal and child care ser-vices 
during the course of the project. 
36 CEDPA, 2004; and CREHPA, 2002.
REDUCING UNINTENDED PREGANCIES CASE STUDY 
Intervention: 
Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors 
Country: Afghanistan 
Type of Intervention: Health provider training 
Implementing Organizations: Family Health Alliance (FHA) 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Women in Afghanistan are among the least 
empowered groups in the world. Afghan 
women often lack agency to make the most 
basic decisions, including those regarding 
reproductive health and family planning. 
Additionally, the country has one of the 
highest maternal mortality rates in the 
world.37 This is a direct result of the patriar-chal 
structures prevalent across 
Afghanistan, and the ensuing constraints 
placed on women’s lives. The restrictions 
limit women’s educational and economic 
opportunities, as well as their access to 
reproductive health care. In addition, years 
of conflict and instability have devastated 
Afghanistan’s health care facilities and 
health professional capacities, further 
impacting women’s health. 
Objective 
This intervention (implemented 2005 – 
2007) sought to address maternal mortality 
in Afghanistan by preventing unwanted 
pregnancies and promoting birth spacing 
through the expansion of family planning 
services. 
Strategy 
FHA sought to improve RH outcomes by 
training female midwives and doctors using 
the Women’s Empowerment Model. This 
training program focused on clinical skills 
in family planning, particularly IUD inser-tion, 
and increasing family planning knowl-edge. 
The project sought to reduce 
infections, enhance detection and treatment 
of STIs, and improve their approach in edu-cating 
clients in HIV/AIDS/STI prevention. 
FHA trained 47 female family planning ser-vice 
providers from more than 10 prov-inces. 
The rationale for using a women’s 
empowerment approach was that this 
model would lead to increased communica-tion 
and changes in gender norms and 
decision-making power. Additionally, 
empowered women health providers could 
become more valued members of the 
healthcare system and be better able to 
meet their clients’ healthcare needs. 
The program used five empowerment 
strategies: 
1. Role modeling. The project recruited pro-fessional 
Muslim women trainers from Iran. 
2. Developing critical thinking skills. 
Trainers focused on the status of Afghan 
women and compared them with other 
women in the region. 
3. Individual consultations. The project 
encouraged one-on-one meetings between 
trainers and trainees to discuss barriers to 
trainees completing the program (e.g. 
obtaining husbands’ permission). 
4. Fostering teamwork and personal 
responsibility. Trainees were involved in 
problem-solving tasks during the program. 
5. Overcoming fatalism. The project pro-moted 
women as agents of change and a 
culture of “it can be done.” 
Evaluation Design: 
Single sample pretest-posttest 
The program was evaluated using pre- and 
post-tests of trainees’ knowledge and clini-cal 
skills. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Findings showed a significant increase, 
from 53 percent to 89 percent, in trainee 
knowledge of family planning methods, 
counseling strategies, and STIs and HIV/ 
AIDS. Clinical skills tests showed an aver-age 
score of 86 percent in the areas of 
infection prevention procedures, correct 
use of medical instruments, counseling 
strategies, IUD insertion and removal, and 
detection and treatment of STIs. 
Gender Outcomes 
Results showed that trainees demonstrated 
increased understanding of the importance 
of applying women's empowerment strate- 
1188 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
37 UNICEF and CDC, 2002.
Figure 2.1 
Results of Clinical Assessment: Kabul and Mazar Combined 
n=47 
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 19 
gies when interacting with their family plan-ning 
clients. 
Limitations 
While this intervention demonstrated the 
improvements in healthcare providers’ skills 
that can happen when careful attention is 
paid to the cultural barriers that they face, 
this was also a missed opportunity for 
understanding how gender integration 
affects gender outcomes in addition to 
health outcomes. An evaluation design that 
included, for example, a woman’s empower-ment 
scale to measure gender attitudes, 
would have been a complement to the 
knowledge and clinical assessments, provid-ing 
richer data and a clearer understanding 
of the empowerment process. 
Conclusions 
The results indicate that a women’s empow-erment 
training model can effectively help 
female health providers to develop high lev-els 
of competency in clinical skills and 
greater knowledge of family planning meth-ods, 
counseling strategies, and STIs and 
HIV/AIDS. Trainees also developed a greater 
appreciation of women’s empowerment 
strategies that could be used with family 
planning clients. 
18 
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
References 
Family Health Alliance. Clinical Family 
Planning/ Reproductive Health Training 
Program in Afghanistan, 2007. Accessed 
online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.familyhealthal-liance. 
org/programs.php. 
Taraneh R. Salke, Lessons from the Field: 
Using a Women's Empowerment Model to 
Train Midwives and Doctors in Afghanistan. 
Presentation at 2007 APHA Conference. 
Washington, DC: FHA, 2007. 
0 
75% or 
Below 
76-80% 81-85% 86-90% 91-95% 96-100% 
Number of People 
Percent Correct 
Note: Results indicate percent of questions answered correctly after health provider trainings. 
Source: T. R. Salke, 2007.
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies Case Study 
Intervention: 
PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program 
Country: Bolivia 
Type of Intervention: Reproductive health service delivery 
Implementing Organizations: PROCOSI (Programa de Coordinación en Salud Integral) 
Cost: Average cost of intervention only: $23,148 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Bolivia has a long history of discrimination 
against women, evident in many national 
health and well-being indicators where 
women suffer from higher rates of poverty, 
illiteracy, unemployment, domestic violence, 
and lower rates of political participation. 
Healthcare clinics often overlook the inequi-ties 
between women’s and men’s lives, 
including power, decision-making capacity, 
and access to resources, as well as varying 
communication patterns. These inequities 
limit women’s ability to access and use 
reproductive health services. 
Objective 
The objective of this project was to assess the 
effects and cost of incorporating a gender per-spective 
into existing RH service programs. 
Strategy 
PROCOSI is a network of 24 Bolivian NGOs 
that coordinates and implements health pro-grams 
throughout the country. The 
“Incorporating Gender Program” was imple-mented 
from 2001 – 2003 by 17 of the 
PROCOSI partner NGOs. First, all PROCOSI 
organizations were invited to participate in 
the program. Next, PROCOSI adapted a 
framework developed by International 
Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF)38 to 
operationalize a gender perspective. The 
framework evaluated seven organizational 
areas through 71 indicators. The organiza-tional 
areas included: institutional policies 
and practices; practices of providers; client 
satisfaction; client comfort; use of gendered 
language; information, communication and 
training; and monitoring and evaluation. 
PROCOSI trained evaluation teams 
from each of the 17 organizations. The 
teams completed baseline evaluations and 
analyzed the results. Each team then partici-pated 
in two workshops to decide which 
areas the organization should improve 
upon. An action plan was developed for 
each selected indicator and then imple-mented 
over a 15-month period. All partici-pating 
organizations received a package of 
Married, Non-Pregnant Women With Unmet Family Planning Needs 
SURVEY 
Unmet need for: Pre (N=707) Post (N=830) 
Limiting with desire to use* 10.6 7.1 
Spacing with desire to use* 6.1 3.8 
Limiting and spacing* 25.5 20.8 
Limiting and spacing with desire to use* 16.7 10.9 
* Significant statistical difference between periods with a confidence level of 95 percent 
Source: E. Palenque, et al., Effects and Costs of Implementing a Gender-Sensitive Reproductive 
Health Program, 2004. 
print materials and videos related to gender, 
reproductive health, and family planning for 
distribution to clients and providers. 
Evaluation Design: 
Mixed-methods, pretest-posttest 
Household surveys of health service users 
and their partners were administered pre-and 
post-intervention. Nine organizations 
from the participating 17 were initially 
selected, from which 10 clinics were chosen 
for evaluation. IPPF provided technical 
assistance to conduct the baseline and end-line 
studies. The evaluation included: 1) exit 
interviews with clients after their visits to 
the clinics, before and after the gender 
interventions; 2) follow-up interviews with 
the same women in their households three 
months after the exit interviews; 3) a survey 
with a sample of the women’s partners; 4) 
analysis of service statistics; 5) a cost anal-ysis 
to estimate the costs of incorporating a 
gender perspective into service delivery; and 
6) monthly visits to each clinic to qualita-tively 
assess changes in the organization. 
Student’s T and Chi square tests were used 
to test significance. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Results showed significant decreases in 
unmet need for family planning when all 
sites were aggregated. Unmet need for teta-nus 
vaccination among pregnant women 
20 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
% % 
and for contraceptive services among non-pregnant 
women were used as proxy indica-tors 
to assess the impact of the 
interventions on users’ health. There were 
no significant changes in meeting unmet 
needs related to tetanus vaccines for preg-nant 
women. 
There were significant changes in out-comes 
related to quality of care, including 
more comfortable interactions with the 
health provider and changes in provider 
practices, such as mentioning SRH issues. 
There was a significant increase in the pro-portion 
of women who reported that provid-ers 
asked them questions or gave them 
specific information to actively explore their 
health needs, on topics such as cervical or 
breast cancer, STIs/HIV/AIDS, sexuality, and 
domestic and sexual violence. There were 
also significant increases in screening for 
FP needs. The proportion of women 
screened on the above topics, however, 
remained below half at endline. 
Gender Outcomes 
The evaluation measured changes in partner 
communication, couple decisionmaking, and 
attitudes toward gender roles and gender-based 
violence. Findings showed modest 
changes. There were no significant changes 
38 IPPF, Manual to Evaluate Quality of Care 
from a Gender Perspective, 2000. 
Table 2.2
Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 21 
Table 2.3 
Table 2.4 
with regard to women’s perceptions of their 
partners’ attempts to control them; however, 
there was a significant decrease in the pro-portion 
of men who said they always 
decided what their partner had to do, for-bade 
her from wearing certain kinds of 
clothes, and did not allow her to speak in 
social gatherings. 
In both surveys, but particularly at end-line, 
the majority of women said they could 
speak easily to their husbands regarding FP 
methods, when to have children, sexual 
relations, STIs, and family health. 
With regard to perceptions of gender 
roles, significant changes in women’s 
responses toward more gender-equitable views 
were found in two indicators: it is not correct 
for a woman to initiate sexual relations, and 
women’s work should be mainly at home. One 
indicator—women’s work should be mainly in 
the home—was significant for men. 
The proportion of women who believed 
that there are circumstances in which men 
have the right to beat their partners 
decreased significantly from 4.4 to 1.8 per-cent. 
No significant changes were found 
among men. 
Replication 
As a follow-up to the above intervention, in 
2005 FRONTIERS collaborated with 
PROCOSI to test the feasibility and costs of 
a certification system for verifying that its 
member organizations provided gender-sen-sitive 
reproductive health services. Service-delivery 
facilities were required to comply 
with 80 percent of 65 pre-established stan-dards 
on quality of care and gender. The 
categories included institutional policies and 
practices, provider practices, personnel 
knowledge of reproductive health, client 
comfort, use of gendered language, infor-mation, 
education, communication and 
training, client satisfaction, and monitoring 
and evaluation. 
The certification process was imple-mented 
in three steps: an initial diagnostic 
assessment; development and implementa-tion 
of workplans; and finally an external 
evaluation to issue the two-year certification. 
The initial diagnostic assessment showed 
that the NGO facilities complied with an aver-age 
of 14 percent of the gender- and quality-related 
standards. At the endline assessment, 
the facilities met 94 percent of the standards. 
Average costs for improvements 
across the seven facilities were lower than 
the case study intervention, averaging 
$4,004, compared to $23,148. Excluding 
staff time, the average cost was $2,039, 
with the majority of expenses due to meet-ings, 
workshops, and infrastructure 
improvements in the three facilities that 
required infrastructure changes. 
Limitations 
The high cost of the intervention poses a 
considerable challenge to replicating or scal-ing 
up this intervention. As the follow-on 
project by FRONTIERS and PROCOSI dem-onstrated, 
a more cost-effective approach to 
operationalizing a gender perspective may 
be to develop a certification system with 
teams from the NGOs implementing all 
training activities, infrastructure changes, 
procedures, and revisions of statutes with 
their own resources. Under this approach, 
14 out of 15 organizations were able to 
meet 80 percent of the standards, costing, 
on average, $19,144 less than the incorpo-rating 
gender program. 
Conclusions 
PROCOSI'S gender program produced a 
number of positive RH outcomes, including 
a decrease in unmet need for contraception, 
improved client satisfaction and quality of 
care, increased staff awareness of SRH, and 
positive changes in behavior among male 
and female staff. 
The intervention produced moderate 
but important gender outcomes, including 
women’s increased confidence in their 
capacity to discuss SRH and awareness of 
their rights to use contraceptive methods. 
Among partners, a decrease in tolerance of 
gender-based violence was found. 
References 
E. Palenque, L. Monano, R. Vernon, F. 
Gonzales, P. Riveros, and J. Bratt. Effects 
and Costs of Implementing a Gender- 
Sensitive Reproductive Health Program. 
Frontiers Final Report. (Washington, DC: 
Population Council, 2004). 
E. Palenque, P. Riveros Hamel, and R. 
Vernon. Consolidating a Gender Perspective 
in the PROCOSI Network. Frontiers Final 
Report. (Washington, DC: Population 
Council, 2007). 
Women’s Perceptions of Characteristics of Their Interaction with 
Health Providers (significant outcomes) 
Variable Pre-survey (%) Post-survey (%) 
N= 1,060 N= 1,062 
Felt uncomfortable during the interaction 8.3 5.8 
Called by her name 72.7 86.8 
Provider used visual aids in his/her interactions 16.8 32.6 
Provider informed her she had right to ask questions 20.3 47.8 
Had time to ask questions 77.8 83.3 
Asked questions 73.6 80.1 
Source: Palenque et al., 2004. 
Affirmative Answers on Variables Related to Gender Roles 
Variable Pre-survey (%) Post-survey (%) 
Women 
It is not correct for a woman to initiate sexual relations 56.3% 52.0% 
Women’s work should be mainly in the home 46.0% 27.5% 
In certain circumstances men have the right to beat 
their partner 4.4% 1.8% 
Men 
Women’s work should be mainly in the home 42.5% 28.3%
Improving Maternal Health 
According to the 2006 Lancet Maternal 
Survival Series, “The risk of a woman dying 
as a result of pregnancy or childbirth during her 
lifetime is about one in six in the poorest parts 
of the world, compared with about one in 
30,000 in Northern Europe.”39 This disparity 
highlights the enormous difficulty of meeting the 
fifth Millennium Development Goal—reducing 
maternal mortality by 75 percent between 1990 
and 2015. Most maternal deaths occur during 
labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum 
period, with the main medical cause of maternal 
deaths being obstetric hemorrhage. 
The social, economic, and political causes 
are many and include gender inequality.40 
Gender-related barriers amplify the physiologi-cal 
dangers associated with motherhood. For 
example, women’s lack of decision-making 
power may deny them access to health care 
and negatively affect maternal health out-comes. 
41 Women’s limited access to education 
can impede their understanding of basic health 
care concepts such as danger signs in preg-nancy. 
In many settings, women’s limited 
mobility outside the home may make them 
uncomfortable in institutional settings, such as 
clinics and hospitals, and interfere with their 
communication with health care providers. 
Men are often the primary wage earners; as 
a result, their health may be valued more than 
women’s,42 and families may be reluctant to 
use resources for pregnancy-related care. 
Pregnant women may be reluctant to consume 
extra calories or seek care when danger signs 
arise,43 or may be scolded by husbands or 
mothers-in-law for doing so.44 Men are often 
primary decisionmakers about their wives’ 
health care, yet they are often ignorant about 
their wives’ health before, after, and even dur-ing 
labor and delivery.45 
In some societies, gender norms require 
that women demonstrate their strength by suf-fering 
3 
22 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
through labor and childbirth with little 
or no assistance.46 Physicians and other obstet-ric 
service providers may discourage or forbid 
family members from being present or provid-ing 
support during labor47 despite the many 
studies that have demonstrated the beneficial 
impact of labor companions on clinical out-comes. 
48 These types of gender-related barriers 
to maternal health come from the personal, 
family, and community levels, and together cre-ate 
significant barriers to women’s ability to 
access services. 
39 Ronsmans and Graham, 2006; accessed online Dec. 1, 
2009 at www.womendeliver.org/pdf/Maternal_Lancet_ 
series.pdf 
40 Sen, Ostlin, and George, 2007. 
41 See Atkinson and Farias, 1995; Nachbar, 1997; Vissandjee 
et al., 1997; World Health Organization, 1995; Roth and 
Mbizvo, 2001. 
42 Schuler et al., 2002. 
43 Hoang et al., 2002. 
44 Raju and Leonard, 2000. 
45 Raju and Leonard, 2000. 
46 Bradby, 1999; Sargent, 1998. 
47 Jessop et al., 2000: 54; Boender et al., 2004:32. 
48 Zhang et al., 1996; Hodnett, 2001; Sosa et al., 1980. 
Program Country 
FEMME Project Peru 
Men in Maternity Project India 
CASE STUDY: South Africa 
Involving Men in Maternity Care 
CASE STUDY: India 
Social Mobilization or Government Services
Strategies Used in Programs to Improve Maternal Health 
Improving use of MH services by improving accurate RH knowledge and 
changing attitudes of mothers-in-law, husbands 
Testing models to encourage husbands’ participation in wives’ antenatal and 
postpartum care 
Providing couples counseling and information and encouraging men to 
attend services 
Training health providers to understand women’s right to basic standard 
of care 
IImmpprroovviinngg MMaatteerrnnaall HHeeaalltthh 2233 
Interventions 
Four projects met the review’s criteria and 
incorporated gender approaches in interven-tions 
to reduce maternal mortality and morbid-ity 
(see table. 3.1 for gender strategies). Of 
these four, two were chosen as case studies 
because of their successful gender transforma-tive 
approaches (see pages 25 and 27). The 
Social Mobilization or Government Services 
Project in India sought to create a supportive 
environment to improve women’s use of ser-vices 
by reaching out to husbands and moth-ers- 
in-law, in addition to women. In South 
Africa, the Involving Men in Maternity Care 
Project followed two broad strategies: improv-ing 
antenatal care services and reaching out to 
couples through counseling and information. 
A common feature of all four projects was 
their recognition that decisions about ante- and 
postnatal care typically are not made by young 
pregnant women and new mothers, but more 
often by husbands or mothers-in-law. These 
projects, therefore, focus on men or older 
women as well as young women. The strategy 
of involving men in maternity care may be seen 
as either gender-accommodating, in building on 
men’s roles as gatekeepers, or gender-transfor-mative 
insofar as it encourages men to expand 
their traditional gender roles. 
These projects also sought to change atti-tudes 
and practices among service providers, 
drawing on some of the longstanding work 
developed under earlier quality of care initia-tives. 
This emphasis on women’s rights to a 
basic standard of care, and to be treated 
respectfully as clients, makes some of the proj-ects 
transformative, since inequitable gender 
norms typically deprive women of rights. 
FEMME Project (Foundations for Enhancing 
Management of Maternal Emergencies)49 
Country: Peru 
Implementing organizations: CARE/Peru; the Peruvian 
Ministry of Health; Columbia University 
This project was implemented in a region of 
Peru’s Southern Highlands. The technical com-ponent 
of the FEMME Project aimed at improv-ing 
clinical quality of care in obstetric 
emergencies through standardized handling of 
clinical cases using a new set of emergency 
obstetric care guidelines. The project combined 
this intervention with a rights component 
stressing women’s rights to decent and humane 
care, and including information for patients, 
privacy during care, and an emphasis on 
respect for local customs and beliefs. 
Of the four projects reviewed in this sec-tion, 
the FEMME project had the most exten-sive 
evaluation. It used a quasi-experimental 
study design with a non-equivalent control 
group, incorporated both quantitative and qual-itative 
methods of data collection, and mea- 
23 
Table 3.1 
49 CARE, 2007.
sured health outcomes rather than process 
variables only. The evaluation covered five 
intervention and five control health facilities. 
The study found that the FEMME approach was 
well accepted among health personnel (doctors, 
obstetricians, and nurses). The evaluation 
results show markedly higher scores in the 
intervention facilities in the correct use of clin-ical 
obstetric protocols, dramatic increases in 
the treatment of obstetric complications, and a 
reduction of over 80 percent in case fatalities. 
The maternal mortality rate declined by 49 
percent in the intervention facilities, compared 
with a 25 percent decline in the comparison 
group. The total cost of the FEMME Project was 
approximately US$750,000, including the years 
of intervention as well as administrative closure 
and documentation activities (2000-2006). 
Men in Maternity Project (MiM)50 
Country: India 
Implementing organizations: The Employees’ State Insurance 
Corporation (ESIC) and the Population Council. 
This project tested a model that encouraged 
husbands’ participation in their wives’ antena-tal 
and postpartum care. Addressing the fact 
that many women depend on men for access to 
healthcare, further complicated by socio-cul-tural 
norms on appropriate sexual behavior for 
men and women, the interventions included: 1) 
individual or group counseling sessions for men 
and women separately, in the antenatal clinic; 
2) couples’ counseling sessions during antena-tal 
and postnatal clinics; 3) screening of all 
pregnant women for syphilis; and 4) syndromic 
management of men reporting urethral dis-charge 
and men and women reporting genital 
ulcers. 
The MiM project used a non-equivalent con-trol 
group study design to examine the effects 
of the intervention. Three of 34 ESIC dispensa-ries 
in Delhi with the highest antenatal clinic 
attendance that also had laboratory facilities 
were selected as intervention sites and three as 
control sites. Concerning FP/RH outcomes, the 
study found improved knowledge of FP among 
both men and women and improved knowledge 
of pregnancy danger signs among women but 
not men, and no improvements in STI knowl-edge 
24 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
or condom use. There was a significant 
increase in screening of pregnant women for 
syphilis with the establishment of a universal 
syphilis screening program. 
As for gender outcomes, husbands’ involve-ment 
was significantly higher in the interven-tion 
group during antenatal consultation, family 
planning consultation, postpartum visit, and 
presence during labor and delivery. 
Communication between spouses increased in 
the postpartum period on baby’s health, breast-feeding, 
and family planning issues, but com-munication 
on STIs was low and did not 
significantly increase. More women from the 
intervention group compared to the control 
group reported making joint decisions on fam-ily 
health and family planning issues. 
Improvements were also documented in client-provider 
interaction and satisfaction. 
50 Varkey et al., 2004.
Improving Maternal Health Case Study 
Intervention: 
Involving Men in Maternity Care 
Country: South Africa 
Type of Intervention: ANC and postpartum care program 
Implementing Organizations: Reproductive Health Research Unity (RHRU), University of the Witwatersrand, FRONTIERS, 
KwaZulu Natal Department of Health 
cost: Total cost of intervention only = $97,552; Cost per clinic = $16,258 
Improving Maternal Health 25 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
In the traditional Zulu community where 
this intervention took place, family plan-ning 
has been predominately the woman’s 
responsibility. Men, however, are often the 
primary household authority, controlling 
income and expenditures and granting per-mission 
for their partner to seek health 
care. It is usually the male partner who 
decides which contraceptive method, if 
any, will be used. These gender roles 
impact a woman’s reproductive health 
decisionmaking abilities and communica-tion 
with her partner. These roles also limit 
men’s understanding of RH and MH, and 
their participation as supportive and 
engaged partners. The contradiction 
between women’s expected responsibilities 
and limited agency, coupled with norms 
indicating that men are the sole decision-makers 
in a household, can negatively 
affect reproductive health outcomes. 
Objective 
The main goal of the intervention was to 
design and test an expanded antenatal and 
postpartum care program to improve 
women’s and men’s reproductive health by 
increasing the use of postpartum family 
planning and protective behaviors for STIs 
and HIV/AIDS. The intervention (imple-mented 
from 2000 – 2003) sought to 
encourage men’s participation in their part-ners’ 
maternity care by adjusting services 
to welcome men and encourage couples’ 
counseling. 
Strategy 
Two clinic-based strategies were used. The 
first strategy, improving existing antenatal 
care services, included information, educa-tion, 
and communication through dissemi-nation 
of an information leaflet and an 
antenatal booklet for couples. The second 
strategy, couples’ counseling, trained 
health providers on constructive engage-ment 
of men and invited partners of 
women to attend counseling during and 
post pregnancy. 
Formative research was carried out to 
inform the intervention, including: a facility-based 
analysis; a case study on syphilis 
screening and management in antenatal cli-ents; 
client flow analysis and a time motion 
study of how providers spent their time; 
focus group discussions; and record 
reviews. 
To ensure program support, several 
meetings were held with key stakeholders, 
including Department of Health officials at 
local, provincial, and national levels; clinic 
managers; and health care providers. 
Several technical working groups developed 
information, education, and communication 
materials and in-service training modules, 
and made recommendations for creating a 
couple-friendly environment. 
Two trainings were held, one for all 
clinic and support staff and a second for 65 
professional nurses working in the interven-tion 
clinics. Topics in this second training 
included pregnancy, preparation for delivery, 
postnatal care, involving men in maternity, 
sexual health, basic counseling, quality 
improvement, and infection control. 
Each clinic developed its own plan 
regarding how to schedule couple counsel-ing. 
Invitation letters were sent encouraging 
men’s participation in the counseling ses-sions 
(two letters during antenatal care and 
one post-delivery) and attendance certifi-cates 
were given to men who attended 
counseling sessions during work hours to 
present to their employers. Nurses facili-tated 
the interactive group couple-counsel-ing 
sessions, which covered antenatal care 
procedures, physiological and emotional 
changes, pregnancy danger signs and care 
seeking, delivery plan, post-delivery care for 
mother and baby, STI and HIV/AIDS preven-tion 
and management, family planning, and 
infant feeding. 
Evaluation Design: Cluster 
randomized-controlled trial 
The study design was a cluster random-ized- 
controlled trial with six clinics imple-menting 
the intervention and six control 
clinics continuing to provide services as 
normal. Individual interviews were col-lected 
to evaluate the program. Baseline 
interviews (995 respondents in the inter-vention 
group and 1081 in the control 
group) were collected prior to the women’s 
first antenatal appointment. Follow-up 
interviews were conducted six months 
post-delivery (follow-up rate: 68 percent 
for women and 80 percent for men). Focus 
group discussions were conducted with 
health providers at intervention clinics to 
evaluate their satisfaction with the inter-vention 
activities. Cost data were collected 
on the costs of planning, implementing, 
and monitoring the intervention. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
In emergency situations, a significantly 
higher proportion of men in the intervention 
group assisted their partners compared to 
men in the control group. Significantly 
more couples in the intervention 
continued on next page
group discussed topics related to STIs, 
sexual relations, immunization, and breast-feeding. 
Among women exposed to counseling 
and the booklet, the intervention signifi-cantly 
improved the knowledge of condoms 
for dual protection; no similar improvement 
was seen in their male partners. 
Compared to those in the control 
group, women in the intervention group 
were significantly more likely to be assisted 
by their partners when experiencing prob-lems 
during pregnancy. There were no sig-nificant 
differences in knowledge of 
obstetric danger signs or in the following 
indicators: use of contraception or methods 
at six months postpartum, STI and HIV/ 
AIDS knowledge and risk behavior, syphilis 
testing and management, and breastfeeding 
practices. 
Gender Outcomes 
As mentioned above, communication among 
the couples improved and couples were 
more likely to discuss such topics as STIs 
and sexual relations. 
Limitations 
The intervention failed to achieve significant 
outcomes on some of the indicators. One 
explanation for this may be that the evalua-tion 
results under-represent the project’s 
impact due to possible contamination 
effects in service delivery. The same super-visors 
and managers were responsible for 
both the intervention and control clinics, 
and may have unknowingly changed ser-vices 
at the control clinics because of their 
experience at the intervention clinics. 
Clinic statistics were used to match 
clinics and randomly assign them to the 
Issues Discussed by Matched Couples 
topics discussed control Couples % intervention couples % 
treatment groups. Clinic records were not 
always accurate, however, and some could 
not achieve the expected numbers of partici-pants. 
This meant that some clinics had too 
few participants to be included in statistical 
comparisons. 
A number of project and research 
design components could have been 
improved to address the overall low levels 
of significance. Programming could have 
been enhanced by extending the interven-tion 
period or including mass communica-tion 
strategies, and the research design 
could have been strengthened by reducing 
chances for contamination. 
Conclusions 
The intervention successfully demonstrated 
that male participation in this context is fea-sible. 
That one-third of couples attended the 
counseling is notable, given that this was a 
new concept in a community where there 
was negligible male participation in mater-nity 
care and most couples were not cohabi-tating. 
Other men expressed willingness to 
participate, but were unable due to work 
schedules, lack of permission from employ-ers, 
or not being told about the counseling 
by their female partners. 
The evaluation provided evidence that 
the intervention was effective in significantly 
changing couple communication and part-ner 
assistance during emergency situations 
and improving knowledge of condoms as a 
dual protection method. 
References 
B. Kunene, M. Beksinska, S. Zondi, N. 
Mthembu, S. Mullick, E. Ottolenghi, I. 
Kleinschmidt, S. Adamchak, B. Janowitz, 
and C. Cuthbertson, Involving Men in 
Maternity Care: South Africa. Frontiers, Final 
Report (Washington, DC: Population 
Council, 2004). 
2266 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
(n=528) (n=588) 
STI 64 75* 
Sexual relation 75 81* 
Family planning 70 77 
Whether to have more children 49 54 
Immunization 75 81* 
Breastfeeding 83 87* 
Baby's health 71 78 
* p<0.05 
Source: Frontiers. 
Table 3.2
Improving Maternal Health Case Study 
Intervention: 
Social Mobilization or Government Services 
Country: India 
Type of Intervention: Community-based mobilization and government RH services 
Implementing Organizations: Foundation for Research in Health Systems (FRHS), ICRW 
Cost: Total cost of implementation and evaluation: $93,248. (Social mobilization – 42%; Government services – 18%; 
Research and administration – 40%.) 
Improving Maternal Health 27 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Rates of adolescent marriage and early child-bearing 
in India are among the highest in 
South Asia. Sexual and reproductive health 
education is a taboo subject for unmarried 
girls and so young women who enter into 
marriage are likely to be uninformed about 
issues such as contraception, pregnancy, 
STIs, and disease prevention. After marriage, 
gender restrictions and social norms (includ-ing 
limited mobility and decisionmaking), in 
addition to an unsupportive environment for 
young women’s reproductive health, may 
prevent young women from accessing RH 
care and family planning services. Mothers-in- 
law often play a significant role in their 
daughters-in-law’s lives and control their 
health-seeking behavior. 
Objective 
This study, implemented from 2001 – 2006, 
examined the relative effectiveness of 
addressing supply versus demand con-straints 
to improve RH for young married 
women. 
Strategy 
The intervention targeted newly married 
couples in two comparable neighborhoods 
of Ahmednagar district in Maharashtra. 
Social mobilization and government health 
service improvement strategies were used 
to address the demand and supply con-straints, 
respectively. The strategies were 
developed in response to formative research 
carried out from 1996–1999 as part of a 
larger program that identified constraints to 
women’s reproductive health. 
The social mobilization strategy was 
implemented through existing community-based 
organizations and in collaboration 
with youth and women’s groups. These 
groups served as interactive health educa-tion 
sessions for married adolescent girls. 
Young girls’ husbands participated in male 
group forums. FRHS anticipated that engag-ing 
male youth groups and women’s groups 
would encourage husbands and mothers-in-law 
to participate in and support young 
women’s reproductive health-seeking, 
thereby creating a more supportive environ-ment. 
Two FRHS social workers and two 
members from the government’s district 
training center organized the social mobili-zation 
activities. 
The government health service 
improvement strategy was implemented in 
partnership with the government health sys-tem 
and focused on training local health 
officials. Government health providers were 
also sensitized to adolescents’ health needs 
and trained on how to provide couple coun-seling 
to married adolescent girls and their 
husbands. 
Evaluation Design: 
4-Cell experimental design 
Four interventions were each implemented 
in one primary health center (PHC) area: 
One PHC had only social mobilization strate-gies; 
a second focused only on improving 
government health services; a third had 
both strategies concurrently (SM+GS); and 
a fourth, the control area, received neither. 
The interventions and control PHC were 
assigned randomly. Across the four PHCs, 
22 sub-center villages were encompassed. 
FRHS conducted a baseline survey of 
1,866 married girls and women ages 16-22 
years across the study villages, collecting 
data on adolescent girls’ health needs and 
constraints; health-seeking patterns; and 
experiences and perceptions of quality of 
care for a number of reproductive health 
outcomes. Similar surveys were completed 
at the midpoint (N=2,100) and endline 
(N=2,359). 
Mid-intervention, 972 husbands of 
young women were surveyed to collect data 
on their knowledge of, and involvement in, 
their wives’ health-seeking. Similarly, 75 
mothers-in-law were interviewed at mid-point 
to assess their attitudes toward their 
daughters-in-law. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Of the four study arms, the two arms that 
included social mobilization strategies saw 
the greatest improvement in reproductive 
health outcomes. The social mobilization area 
was most effective in improving women’s 
knowledge of maternal health, contraceptive 
side effects, and abortion, and increasing 
behaviors related to postnatal check-ups, 
contraceptive use, treatment of gynecological 
disorders, and partner treatment of reproduc-tive 
tract infections and STIs. 
The SM+GS site saw the greatest increase in 
basic awareness of reproductive health and 
infertility. One explanation for this outcome 
may be that a new female doctor who took a 
special interest in these issues began work-ing 
in this site in the middle of the interven-tion. 
The government services-only site did 
not see significant improvements in most 
outcomes. 
Gender Outcomes 
Qualitative interviews with mothers-in-law 
indicated that the social mobilization inter-vention 
contributed to an increase in sup-portive 
attitudes toward daughters-in-law’s 
health-care seeking. 
Surveys of husbands at mid-point 
showed that most had gained an awareness
of basic maternal care issues and were will-ing 
to seek treatment for problems during 
pregnancy and childbirth. 
Limitations 
Due to the popularity of the health educa-tion 
sessions, representatives in the control 
arm began implementing their own health 
education sessions. Therefore, some con-tamination 
of the research design may have 
Percent Change from Baseline to Endline, By Strategy 
Need for full ANC 66.1 18.5 -3.4 50.2 
Need for PNC 129.5 43.5 24.6 81.7 
Spacing FP methods 14.4 14.1 12.4 9.7 
Had PNC check-ups 40.5 -17.8 2.9 2.9 
High-risk delivery care 4.7 4.2 29.8 24.4 
Treatment-RTI symptoms 49.5 44.8 98.2 26.7 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
occurred. 
Although husbands’ data showed 
increased awareness and willingness to 
seek maternal care for their wives, only a 
minority of husbands actually accompanied 
wives to the health care centers. This may 
be partly because social norms and health 
centers, which offer minimal privacy, dis-courage 
male participation. 
Conclusions 
This study illustrates the effectiveness of 
social mobilization in increasing young mar-ried 
women’s knowledge of RH, increasing 
use of RH services, and changing social 
norms and attitudes of mothers-in-law 
toward their daughters-in-law’s RH. 
The research team expected the com-bination 
arm to generate the best outcomes, 
by addressing both the demand and supply 
constraints of women’s health-seeking. The 
SM-only arm, however, performed better for 
many outcomes; having a more focused 
and concentrated intervention may be one 
explanation for this. 
The project’s work with mothers-in-law 
and husbands showed some success as 
well. The evaluators found the inroads with 
husbands to be especially notable because 
maternal care in this society typically is 
regarded as a “woman’s issue.” Efforts 
should continue to be made to encourage 
male participation in their wives’ maternal 
care. 
SM GS SM + GS Ctrl 
References 
International Center for Research on 
Women, “Social Mobilization or Government 
Services: What Influences Married 
Adolescents’ Reproductive Health in Rural 
Maharashtra, India?” in Briefing Kit, 
Improving the Reproductive Health of 
Married and Unmarried Youth in India 
(Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006). 
R. Pande, K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. MacQuarrie, 
and S. Jain, “Improving the Reproductive 
Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in 
India: Evidence of Effectiveness and Costs 
from Community-Based Interventions” 
(Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006). 
Source: ICRW, 2006. 
28 
Table 3.3
Improving Maternal Health 29
Reducing HIV/AIDS 
and Other STIs 
Much has been written about the effect of 
gender on the HIV/AIDS pandemic.51 
Gender contributes to the epidemic by increas-ing 
vulnerability to the virus and exacerbating 
the impact of living with HIV and AIDS. 
Gender norms affect both women’s and 
men’s sexual behavior and ability to protect 
against HIV/AIDS. When gender norms, cus-toms, 
and laws relegate women to a lower sta-tus 
than men it makes women particularly 
vulnerable to HIV. In a review of Ghana’s 
response to HIV/AIDS, the authors write that 
“[g]ender issues are at the core of the 
Ghanaian – and sub-Saharan – epidemic” and 
add that the epidemic is “basically fueled by 
sexual behavior and women often have little or 
no decision-making power in sexual rela-tions.” 
52 Worldwide, almost half of the people 
living with HIV or AIDS are women; in sub- 
Saharan Africa, 61 percent of those living with 
HIV or AIDS are women.53 
Gender norms pertaining to men—norms 
that prescribe roles such as early, risky sex 
with multiple partners—also puts them at 
increased risk.54 Moreover, men may be reluc-tant 
to seek medical information and services 
for HIV and AIDS, because of gender norms 
that portray health-seeking behavior as weak 
and non-masculine. Failure to access such ser-vices 
30 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
negatively impacts both men and their 
partners. 
A UNAIDS report notes that in many coun-tries 
women are “receiving more than expected 
coverage for antiretroviral therapy,” and that 
additional research is needed to explore the rea-sons 
for the imbalance. In one study of antiret-roviral 
treatment (ART) centers in 13 countries 
that included over 33,000 individuals, 60 per-cent 
of the patients on treatment were women. 
Noting masculine roles that present barriers for 
men accessing treatment, the study concluded 
that, “More attention needs to be paid to ensur-ing 
that HIV-infected men are seeking care and 
starting HAART [Highly Active Anti-Retroviral 
Therapy].”55 It is important to assess whether or 
not treatment coverage mirrors patterns of 
infection to determine if any groups are facing 
unequal access to services. 
Economic realities can also compound gen-der 
inequality and power relations as a risk fac-tor 
for HIV/AIDS and a barrier to treatment. 
While women are generally resilient and play 
key roles in the fight against HIV/AIDS, women 
are also less likely to have access to resources 
and more likely to depend on men for financial 
survival for themselves and their children. 
Women, particularly young women, have a 
range of motivations for seeking out multiple 
Program Country 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales Nicaragua 
Men as Partners South Africa 
Yaari Dosti India 
Play Safe Cambodia 
Mothers2Mothers Program South Africa 
Integration of RH Services for Men Bangladesh 
in Health & Family Welfare Centers 
Involving Men in Sexual and 
Reproductive Health Services Ecuador 
CASE STUDY: Tuelimishane Tanzania 
CASE STUDY: Stepping Stones South Africa 
CASE STUDY: Program H Brazil 
51 See UNIFEM, Gender and AIDS Web Portal, 2009. 
52 Antwi and Oppong, 2003, p.6. 
53 UNAIDS, 2007. 
54 UNAIDS, 2007. 
55 Britstein et al., 2008, p. 48. 
4
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 31 
partners, and operate on a continuum of voli-tion56 
that often makes it difficult to negotiate 
safer sex, regardless of their motivation. For 
many women, having more than one partner 
and engaging in cross-generational and transac-tional 
sex are economic survival strategies to 
support themselves and their dependents.57 
Moreover, the economic disadvantage of 
women in many societies leads to a lack of sexual 
negotiation power. Women’s need for economic 
support from husbands or partners—particu-larly 
if they have children—can lead women to 
remain silent on matters of sex and fidelity in 
relationships that confer some level of eco-nomic 
security. The fear of economic abandon-ment 
by husbands or partners may be greater 
when extramarital relationships are explicit, 
resulting in an increased powerlessness to 
negotiate safe sex just when the risks of STI 
transmission are the highest.58 
In some countries, HIV-positive women 
(and men) face employment discrimination 
because of their HIV status. For example, some 
employers require HIV testing as a condition of 
employment, while others have abused the 
employment rights of workers who test posi-tive. 
59 Legal frameworks that insure nondis-crimination 
on the basis of sex can empower 
women. Conversely, inequality under the law, 
for example with regard to property and inheri-tance 
rights, can increase women’s vulnerabil-ity 
to HIV/AIDS. For many women, loss of a 
husband to HIV/AIDS is followed by loss of 
property and land, exacerbating the impact of 
the disease and limiting their ability to protect 
themselves and their families.60 
Interventions 
Evaluations of a number of interventions in this 
chapter provide strong evidence that address-ing 
gender norms, promoting policies and pro-grams 
to extend equality in legal rights, and 
expanding services for women and men can 
result in improved HIV/AIDS and gender out-comes. 
It should be noted that the outcomes 
identified in these projects are intermediary 
outcomes such as knowledge, risk perceptions 
and behavior change such as increased condom 
use. These outcomes are routinely measured in 
behavioral surveys that constitute second-gen-eration 
surveillance, and are considered for-bearers 
to reductions in HIV incidence. 
Measuring reductions in HIV incidence would 
require longer-term interventions and evalua-tions 
than would be possible with the projects 
included in this review. 
The evaluations show that changing gender 
norms requires long-term interventions. As 
aptly noted by Mozambique’s former Prime 
Minister, Pascoal Mocumbi, “To change funda-mentally 
how girls and boys learn to relate to 
each other and how men treat girls and women 
is slow, painstaking work. But surely our chil-dren’s 
lives are worth the effort.”61 
Of the 10 interventions reviewed in this 
chapter, six undertook gender transformative 
approaches and four focused primarily on 
accommodating gender differences. Among the 
gender transformative interventions, six 
addressed gender norms related to HIV and 
AIDS. Three projects were selected as case 
studies: Tuelimishane, Stepping Stones, and 
Program H. Tuelimishane in Tanzania is a 
community-based HIV and anti-violence pro-gram 
for young men in Dar es Salaam that 
combined community-based drama and peer 
education.62 The interventions for young men 
were designed around three themes that 
emerged from formative research, namely, infi-delity, 
sexual communication, and conflict. 
Stepping Stones, originally designed to address 
the HIV epidemic in Uganda in the mid-1990s, 
is now among the most widely used prevention 
interventions around the world, having been 
used in over 40 countries.63 Program H in 
Brazil was developed on the premise that gen-der 
norms, which are passed on by families, 
peers, and institutions, and are interpreted and 
internalized by individuals, can be changed. 
The 10 interventions indicate that strategies 
to reduce HIV/AIDS and other STIs that incor-porate 
gender are becoming increasingly 
sophisticated in their approach to addressing 
gender dynamics. Gender integration in HIV 
and other STI prevention projects is primarily 
3311 
56 Weissman et al., 2006. 
57 Hope, 2007. 
58 Boender et al., 2004. 
59 Human Rights Watch, 2004. 
60 Human Rights Watch, 2002. 
61 Edwards, 2001: 1. 
62 Mbwambo and Maman, 2007; Maganja et al., 2007. 
63 Jewkes et al., 2007.
transformative in nature in that the focus is on 
changing the dynamics of interaction between 
women and men. The projects reviewed in this 
chapter focused on increasing women’s empow-erment 
and on challenging gender norms that 
affect men’s health. While behavior takes lon-ger 
to change than knowledge and attitudes, 
these projects show promising results toward 
achieving this behavior change. 
Table 4.1 lists the key gender strategies 
used to reduce HIV/AIDS and other STIs in the 
programs reviewed. 
Table 4.1 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 
(We’re Different, We’re Equal)64 
Country: Nicaragua 
Implementing organizations: Puntos de Encuentro; Evaluation 
by PATH, Horizons/Population Council, the National 
Autonomous University of Nicaragua’s Centro de 
Investigacion de Demografia y Salud (CIDS), local consul-tants, 
and Puntos de Encuentro. 
This Nicaraguan project used a communica-tions 
for social change strategy aimed at pro-moting 
the empowerment of young men and 
women and preventing HIV infection.The proj-ect 
considered machismo (a construction of 
masculinity that emphasizes power, aggressive-ness, 
and sexual prowess, among other charac-teristics) 
as a risk factor for HIV/AIDS. Somos 
Diferentes, Somos Iguales used the weekly 
drama TV series Sexto Sentido (Sixth Sense), 
which was also broadcast in Costa Rica, 
Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and the U.S., 
and the call-in radio program Sexto Sentido, to 
promote the gender transformative and HIV-prevention 
32 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
messages. It worked with nearly 
300 partners and local organizations to reduce 
access barriers and provide SRH services for 
young people. 
The impact evaluation of Somos Diferentes, 
Somos Iguales included a cohort of 4,800 
young peoples ages 13 to 24 who were ran-domly 
selected in three cities in Nicaragua in 
2003 and who were interviewed three times (at 
the beginning, middle, and end of the interven-tion). 
Two hundred young people were included 
in focus group discussions and in-depth inter-views 
with participants and non-participants. 
Baseline data found that young people had 
good knowledge about HIV/AIDS; however, 
AIDS-related stigma was prevalent and safer 
sex was not regularly practiced. The final sur-vey 
found widespread exposure to the project, 
particularly the TV series Sexto Sentido, and 
that high exposure to project activities led to a 
significant reduction in stigmatizing and gen-der- 
inequitable attitudes, an increase in knowl-edge 
and use of HIV-related services, and a 
significant increase in interpersonal communi-cation 
about HIV prevention and sexual behav-ior. 
The evaluation found that participants with 
greater exposure to the intervention had a 44 
percent greater probability of having used a 
condom during last sex with a casual partner 
compared to their counterparts with less expo-sure 
to the intervention. It also found that men 
with greater exposure to the intervention had a 
56 percent greater probability of condom use 
with casual partners during the past six 
months. 
The evaluation highlighted that the SRH 
realities of Nicaraguan youth are complex and 
difficult to capture with simple outcome mea-sures 
such as condom use, and that individual 
behavior is embedded in social contexts and 
processes. An interesting gender-related finding 
of the evaluation was that while, over time, the 
sample of young people moved toward greater 
equity in gender norms, that movement did not 
appear to result in changes in sexual norms that 
are also affected by gender relations. 
64 Solórzano et al., 2008. 
Strategies Used to Reduce HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 
Participatory learning workshops 
Follow-on community activities to put training into action 
Community-wide condom social marketing campaign using 
gender-equitable messages 
Community-based drama and peer education about HIV and violence 
Weekly TV drama and radio call in show, linked with SRH services and 
organizations 
BCC and condoms distributed through both van outreach and peer 
educators 
Female peer educators and social support 
Increasing male awareness and participation in RH services, including 
RTI/STI
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 33 
Men as Partners (MAP) Program65 
Country: South Africa 
Implementing organizations: EngenderHealth 
The Men as Partners (MAP) Program, developed 
in 1996, has two interrelated goals.The first is 
to increase access to information and services 
that could improve men's sexual and reproduc-tive 
health and to promote the constructive 
role that men could play in both the prevention 
of HIV/STIs and gender-based violence as well 
as in maternal care and family planning. The 
second goal is to actively promote gender 
equality by engaging men to challenge the atti-tudes 
and behaviors that compromise their 
own – and women’s and children’s – health and 
safety. The MAP program is based on applying 
three related elements of constructive men’s 
engagement in both service delivery and com-munity 
settings: 
n That gender roles often give men the ability 
to influence and/or determine the reproduc-tive 
health choices made by women; 
n That gender roles also compromise men’s 
health by encouraging men to equate a 
range of risky behaviors with being a “real 
man,” while encouraging them to view 
health-seeking behaviors as a sign of weak-ness; 
and 
n That men have a personal investment in 
challenging the current gender order and 
can serve as allies to improve their own 
health as well as the health of women and 
children who are often placed at risk of vio-lence 
and ill-health by these gender roles. 
An external evaluation of one MAP workshop 
in Western Cape, South Africa found that partic-ipants 
came away from the workshops with 
more equitable beliefs than were held by a com-parison 
group of men. For example, workshop 
participants were three times as likely to believe 
that women should have the same rights as men 
and that it was not normal for men to beat their 
wives, and to be aware that children from abu-sive 
homes could become abusive parents and 
that sex workers could be raped.66 
Yaari Dosti (Friendship/Bonding Among Men)67 
Country: India 
Implementing organizations: CORO and Horizons/Population 
Council with support from Instituto Promundo 
This project is an adaptation of Program H for 
young men in Mumbai, India that was under-taken 
first as a six-month pilot program on gen-der, 
sexuality, masculinity, and educational 
activities with 126 young men.The evaluation 
of the pilot project included pre- and post-intervention 
surveys that used the GEM scale 
(see explanation in the case study of Program 
H on page 42) and other outcome measures 
and qualitative interviews with 31 participants. 
The survey findings were similar to those in 
Brazil: at the start of the program, a substantial 
portion of the young men supported many 
inequitable gender norms which shifted to 
much less support for inequitable gender norms 
after the program (most changes were signifi-cant 
at the p<.05 level). Yaari Dosti was then 
expanded to include a rural area of Uttar 
Pradesh and, in some sites, to include a com-munity- 
based social marketing campaign to 
promote gender equality and HIV prevention.68 
The sample of young men included married 
and unmarried young men ages 16-29 in the 
urban areas and ages 15-24 in the rural set-tings. 
In the pre-intervention survey, 886 young 
men were included in Mumbai and 1,040 in 
Uttar Pradesh. The post-intervention surveys 
included 537 young men from Mumbai and 601 
from Uttar Pradesh. 
The findings were similar to those of the 
pilot. Gender-equitable beliefs and attitudes 
improved, partner communication got better, 
and there was a significant increase in condom 
use at last sex with all types of partners in the 
intervention sites. Logistic regression showed 
that men in the Mumbai and rural Uttar 
Pradesh interventions sites were more likely 
(1.9 times and 2.8 times, respectively) to have 
used condoms with all types of partners than in 
the comparison sites. Furthermore, self-reported 
violence against partners declined in 
the intervention sites. 
65 Levack, 2001. 
66 Kruger, 2000, cited in Levack, 2001. 
67 Verma et al., 2006; see also Verma et al., 2008 
68 Verma et al., 2008.
Play Safe69 
Country: Cambodia 
Implementing organizations: Reproductive Health Initiative 
for Youth in Asia; evaluation by CARE International. 
This adolescent reproductive health project was 
conducted under EU/UNFPA’s Reproductive 
Health Initiative for Youth in Asia (RHIYA). It 
incorporated concepts of gender equality and 
human rights into activities in response to grow-ing 
evidence of criminal behavior toward women 
within Cambodia by middle class young men. 
The project used male peers as a way to engage 
young men with information about HIV/STIs 
and to change their behavior. Play Safe also 
seeks to empower young males to create positive 
social networks and to use them to encourage 
safe and responsible sexual practice. 
Information and behavior change communica-tion 
(BCC) materials and messages and con-doms 
were distributed through both van 
outreach and peer educators. An evaluation, car-ried 
out by CARE International in Cambodia, 
used primarily qualitative techniques, including 
a peer interview tool to collect data from 77 
young people and the “most significant change 
(MSC)” technique, a story approach in which 
participants answer questions about change. 
The MSC was used to collect data from 20 peer 
educators and 40 youth. These techniques do 
not generate data representative of the group 
exposed to the project, but do provide in-depth 
explanations of behavioral outcomes and their 
potential associations with the project. Data 
were collected at two points during the project 
between 2004 and 2006. 
The evaluation of Play Safe found that 
young men had a variety of sexual partner- 
Improving Sexual Health for Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) 
must be taken in reaching MSM and TG 
individuals with programs and services. 
The three projects described in this 
box provide examples of gender-transfor-mative 
approaches used to meet the needs 
of MSM, including promoting legal and 
social rights and social acceptance. All 
three took place in Asia. 
Bandhu Social Welfare Society 
(BSWS) Project70 
Country: Bangladesh 
Implementing organizations: BSWS with 
FHI, USAID, and PEPFAR 
The Bandhu Society began as a male repro-ductive 
health organization in 1997, offering 
counseling and services through outreach, 
drop-in centers, and health services. In 
2000, FHI began supporting BSWS on a 
range of activities, including strengthening 
advocacy, research, and communication 
69 Hayden, 2007. 
70 FHI, 2007. 
Among sexual minorities, gender relations 
and power dynamics within individual rela-tionships 
and the community, and between 
those communities and larger societies, 
affect the vulnerability to and the impact of 
HIV/AIDS. For example, gender-related 
issues facing men who have sex with men 
(MSM) and transgendered (TG) people are 
complex and relate to stigma against 
same-sex relationships and against individ-uals 
whose behavior deviates from 
“accepted” masculine behavior in many 
societies. These populations lack power in 
society, are often socially marginalized, and 
have limited legal rights and protection. In 
addition, these populations are subject to 
gender-based violence – both within rela-tionships 
and against MSM and TG by 
other groups. Much more work is needed 
to understand and address the gender 
dynamics among sexual minorities and 
societies, and the factors that increase vul-nerability 
and magnify impact. Special care 
34 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
systems. BSWS adapted the Naz Foundation 
International sexual health promotion model 
or service framework, which consists of: 
center services, including drop-in services, 
counseling, education and training; field ser-vices, 
including outreach, community mobi-lization, 
condom and lubricant distribution, 
and referrals; and health services, including 
STI and general health treatment, HIV test-ing, 
and pre- and post-test counseling. 
BSWS also conducted sensitization meet-ings 
with media representatives and journal-ists, 
local leaders and elites, law 
enforcement agencies, activists, and stu-dents. 
They also held coordination meetings 
with representatives from government and 
non-governmental organizations and partici-pated 
in World AIDS Day activities. 
An evaluation was conducted of 
BSWS’s activities, with outcomes assessed 
through Behavioral Surveillance Surveys 
(BSS) at two points in time. No outcomes 
were measured related to the advocacy and
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 35 
ships, ranging from “sweethearts” to casual 
partners to sex workers. Men’s perceptions and 
treatment of these partners differed, with 
sweethearts being treated the best and sex 
workers often subjected to the degrading prac-tice 
of bauk, or forced group sex—perceived by 
young men as a fun way to bond with buddies 
and have sex inexpensively. The second round 
of the evaluation found that the project was 
successful in reducing the practice of bauk, but 
only in that young men were more concerned 
about their own health rather than any aware-ness 
of the effects of bauk on women, who 
were in effect being gang raped. One conclu-sion 
reached by the evaluation was that, “While 
it appears that these young men are increas-ingly 
able to make ‘safe’ and ‘responsible’ deci-sions 
for themselves; to use condoms with 
‘risky’ partners, access services, and seek infor-mation; 
they appear unable or unwilling to 
extend the concepts of safety and responsibility 
into their interactions with their female part-ners. 
Amongst the group of young men targeted 
by this research and Play Safe, this is clearly 
not an issue of knowledge, but of attitudes.” In 
the evaluation, the messages related to gender 
concepts, social change, and human rights were 
the least well-recalled and least well-followed. 
The evaluation called for more research on 
gender identity in Cambodian youth culture 
and for stronger programs to help men develop 
alternative ways to express and affirm their 
masculinity that are respectful of women and 
promote gender equality and respect for rights. 
In this context, stronger gender-transformative 
approaches are needed in future interventions 
in order to impact gender norms related to 
masculinity and women’s status that underlie 
the practices exhibited in bauk. 
communication activities. The evaluation 
found a sharp increase in distribution of 
condoms from 6,672 in 2000 to 321,112 in 
2004 and of lubricant from zero to 5,870 
tubes during the same period. Risk percep-tion 
rose from 3 to 30 percent and condom 
use with all partner types increased. Uptake 
of STI services also increased. 
Aksi Stop AIDS (ASA)71 
Country: Indonesia 
Implementing organizations: FHI, USAID, 
and PEPFAR 
This project sought to decrease HIV preva-lence 
among MSM, male sex workers 
(MSW), and waria (transgender) popula-tions 
in selected Indonesian provinces by 
increasing and sustaining safer sex and 
health seeking behaviors (including use of 
condoms and lubricants). In addition, ASA 
worked to create a favorable environment 
71 FHI, 2007. 
72 FHI, 2007: 48. 
73 FHI, 2007. 
to support program implementation and 
behavior change through advocacy with 
government agencies and networking with 
other organizations. Outcomes were 
assessed through Behavioral Surveillance 
Surveys (BSS) and/or Integrated Biological 
and Behavioral Surveys (IBBS) in 2002 and 
2004. The evaluation for waria found that 
all key sexual and health seeking behaviors 
showed increases during the two-year time 
period between BSS, including a number of 
statistically significant increases. However, 
testing remained low at 43 percent among 
waria in Jakarta and 20 percent in 
Surabaya. One benefit noted for the pro-gram 
for waria was that staff providing 
services were also waria, which facilitated 
contact with beneficiaries. BSS results for 
MSM and MSW showed positive trends in 
the two cities; however, given low coverage 
of the project, it is difficult to confirm the 
effect of the intervention on the results. No 
gender outcomes were measured. 
In an analysis of the three interven-tions 
for MSM, the evaluation recom-mended 
that a stronger advocacy strategy 
be developed that “includes a local or field-level 
focus, with staff at different levels 
working more with local police officers, 
religious leaders, shopkeepers, guards and 
other gatekeepers, to enable staff to con-duct 
field activities more effectively and to 
influence community norms.”72 
Blue Diamond Society73 
Country: Nepal 
Implementing organizations: Blue Diamond 
Society and FHI 
In Nepal, MSM are stigmatized, harassed, 
and often subject to brutal violence. As a 
result, SRH services for this population 
have often been neglected by both the gov-ernment 
and NGOs, while MSM are often 
continued on next page
Improving Sexual Health for Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) continued from previous page 
hesitant to seek such services, leaving them 
more vulnerable to contracting HIV and 
other STIs. Since 2001, the Blue Diamond 
Society has worked to improve SRH of the 
MSM community in Nepal, employing five 
broad strategies, including behavior change 
communication (BCC), local advocacy and 
networking, social and community mobiliza-tion, 
links to services and products, and 
capacity building. The BCC has included 
group education meetings, distribution of 
materials, referrals for STI treatment and 
counseling, and condom distribution and 
demonstrations. The advocacy and network-ing 
activities addressed gender-related barri-ers 
to HIV prevention by seeking to raise 
awareness of the legal and social rights of 
MSM, improve social acceptance of this 
population, and inform and educate the 
MSM community. Meetings were held with 
various stakeholders, including NGOs, 
police, journalists, lawyers, and media. The 
Society coordinated events and special days 
as well as media campaigns. Film and docu-mentaries 
were used to inform MSM on var-ious 
issues such as sexual orientation. 
FHI conducted an evaluation of the 
components of the Blue Diamond Society 
36 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
program that they started supporting in 
2002, namely: behavior change communica-tion, 
legal advocacy and networking, social 
and community mobilization, and linkages to 
services and products. The evaluation 
showed significantly increased knowledge 
and safer sex behaviors among MSM who 
were exposed to the interventions. Although 
evidence of police brutality persisted, the 
program appeared to increase awareness of 
the MSM community and the need to 
respect their rights. 
mothers2mothers (m2m) Program74 
Country: South Africa 
Implementing organizations: mothers2mothers (an NGO head-quartered 
in South Africa); Evaluation by Horizons/Population 
Council with Health Systems Trust. 
This program focused on prevention of mother-to- 
child transmission of HIV (PMTCT), empower-ing 
pregnant and postpartum women to improve 
their health and the health of their babies, fight-ing 
stigma, and encouraging and supporting dis-closure. 
The program offered educational and 
psychosocial support to HIV-positive pregnant 
women and new mothers, assisted women to 
access PMTCT services, and followed up to 
ensure care of mothers and infants after delivery. 
The evaluation of the m2m program was under-taken 
in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, by 
HORIZONS/Population Council in collaboration 
with Health Systems Trust, using a pre- and post-quasi- 
experimental design. At baseline, 183 HIV-positive 
pregnant women and 178 HIV-positive 
postpartum women were interviewed; at follow-up, 
one year after m2m was introduced, 345 HIV-positive 
pregnant women and 350 HIV-positive 
postpartum women were interviewed. In addition 
to a number of knowledge and practice outcomes 
that were measured, the evaluation assessed psy-chosocial 
well-being among the women. The eval-uation 
found that the m2m program provided a 
strong continuum of care to the women and 
infants. Compared to non-participants, m2m par-ticipants 
had greater psychosocial well-being and 
greater use of PMTCT services and outcomes. 
Postpartum program participants were signifi-cantly 
more likely than non-participants to have 
disclosed their status to someone, and to have 
done so prior to delivery. 
Integration of RH Services for Men in Health 
and Family Welfare Centers75 
Country: Bangladesh 
Implementing organizations: National Institute for Population 
Research and Training (NIPORT), Directorate of Family 
Planning, and FRONTIERS/ Population Council. 
This intervention research study focused on 
training service providers about men’s sexual 
health needs, raising awareness in the commu-nity 
about reproductive tract infections (RTIs) 
and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in 
men, and improving RTI and STI services. The 
evaluation used a quasi-experimental non-equiv-alent 
control group design, with eight Health 
and Family Welfare Centers as intervention sites 
and four as control sites. Data were collected 
through service provider interviews, focus group 
discussions, inventory surveys, client exit inter- 
74 Baek et al., 2007. 
75 Hossain et al., 2004; Alam, Rob, and Khan, 2004.
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 37 
views, and client registers. The intervention 
resulted in increases in male clients seeking ser-vices 
at the intervention clinics from 131 to 337 
per month. Most, however, still came for general 
health issues. The number of male RTI/STI cli-ents 
increased from one to more than five per 
month at intervention sites. Men were able to 
attend services during regular clinic hours. 
Adding RH services for men did not have an 
adverse affect on the number of female clients 
seeking services. Finally, the intervention 
resulted in increased knowledge among service 
providers about male reproductive health issues 
and RTIs/STIs. The study found that female ser-vice 
providers can successfully provide services 
to men. 
Involving Men in Sexual and 
Reproductive Health76 
Country: Ecuador 
Implementing organizations: APROFE (Association for the 
Benefit of the Ecuadorian Family) 
This initiative was undertaken as part of 
APROFE’s efforts to increase the number of 
male clients receiving the organization’s ser-vices. 
The initiative started in the mid-1990s 
and coincided with APROFE’s efforts to become 
more financially sustainable, to improve quality 
of care, and to increase focus on gender equality 
throughout the organization. After an initial 
unsuccessful attempt at establishing male clin-ics, 
the Involving Men initiative sought to attract 
men to clinics attended by women. Providers 
encouraged clients to bring their partners and 
the organization used mass media to encourage 
men and couples to use APROFE’s services. 
Hours in some clinics were extended to 7:00 pm 
and Saturday morning to accommodate work 
schedules. An evaluation was conducted by the 
Harvard School of Public Health through analy-sis 
of APROFE’s documents, interviews with pro-viders 
at all levels in four clinics, 28 
semi-structured individual interviews, and four 
focus group discussions. From 1999 to 2000, the 
evaluation revealed an increase in the number 
of male clients who accompanied their partners, 
from an average 545 to 1,121 per month. The 
number of male clients who came alone also 
increased. For example, service statistics for 
urology visits registered an increase of almost 
2,000 men in 2001. The gender issues raised by 
this intervention included the need to protect 
privacy of male clients and the need to get wom-en’s 
consent for the parts of the visits in which 
they wanted their partners to participate. 
76 Shepard, 2004.
HIV/AIDS/STI Case Study 
Intervention: 
Tuelimishane (“Let’s Educate Each Other”) 
Country: Tanzania 
Type of Intervention: Community theater and peer support 
Implementing Organizations: Tuelimishane Project 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
In Dar es Salaam the links between HIV, vio-lence, 
and infidelity are influenced by gender 
norms, expectations, and relationship struc-tures 
that characterize youth sexual relation-ships, 
including transactional sex. Research 
has shown the link between transactional 
sex, HIV, and intimate partner violence (see 
more on IPV in chapter 5). 
In Dar es Salaam, transactional sex is a 
survival strategy for some women. And in 
cases of infidelity or gender-based violence, 
women may be unlikely to stand up to their 
partners for fear of losing financial support. 
Objective 
The objective of the intervention was to 
reduce HIV-risk behaviors and reported vio-lence 
by young men. 
Strategy 
The program was designed based on forma-tive 
research among young men and women 
regarding the context of sexual relationships 
among youth at risk for HIV, including gen-der 
norms and roles, partner violence, and 
sexual behavior. The theme of transactional 
sex and the roles of young men and women 
in the practice also emerged in the formative 
research. 
The intervention was composed of two 
main components: community theater and 
peer support groups. The community theater 
groups developed three skits, each focusing 
on a different theme (sexual communication, 
infidelity, and conflict resolution.) There were 
a total of 21 public performances in locations 
where young men frequently hang out. The 
performances communicated information 
regarding violence, sexual negotiation, sexual 
responsibility, and HIV risk, and engaged the 
audience in discussion surrounding the main 
theme. Low-literacy print comics were also 
distributed. 
Peer support groups of 10-12 young 
men were formed to create a safe place to 
discuss topics related to social norms, gen-der, 
HIV/AIDS, infidelity, sexual communica-tion, 
and conflict resolution. The support 
groups developed key messages that were 
used in the drama intervention, and then 
reinforced those messages. In addition to 
the same-sex peer groups, mixed-sex and 
mixed-age groups were formed to encour-age 
dialogue across a broader audience and 
to give young men the opportunity to hear 
different perspectives related to sexual 
behavior and gender-based violence. 
Evaluation Design: 
Pretest-posttest control group 
design 
The evaluation consisted of four phases: 
formative, baseline survey, implementation, 
and post-intervention research. Forty men 
and 20 women (ages 16-24 years) were 
interviewed and 14 focus groups were con-ducted 
during the formative phase. A com-munity 
mapping exercise identified social 
venues for youth, transportation routes, and 
other community features that could affect 
the intervention. Baseline surveys were con-ducted 
in the intervention and control sites, 
with 503 and 448 respondents, respectively. 
Table 4.2 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Variable Control Intervention 
Did not use condom during last sex with primary partner 78 (56.9%) 91 (44.8%) 
N=137 N=203 
Condom use reported less than half the time with partners 70 (55.1%) 60 (36.4%) 
in past 6 months N=127 N = 165 
Proportion of men who agree or strongly agree with 
statement that violence vs. women could be justified if: 
She does not complete household work 53 (20.6%) 25 (8.3%) 
N = 257 N = 301 
A woman disobeys her partner 61 (23.7%) 29 (9.7%) 
N = 257 N = 300 
He suspects she is unfaithful 32 (12.4%) 17 (5.6%) 
N = 258 N = 302 
He learns she is unfaithful 56 (21.7%) 26 (8.6%) 
N = 258 N = 301 
She asks him to use condoms 26 (10.2%) 13 (4.3%) 
N = 256 N = 301 
Source: Mbwambo and Maman, 2007. 
3388 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 38
Table 4.3 
Gender Outcomes 
Significant Gender Outcomes Of those who agreed/strongly 
agreed at baseline, proportion 
of men who disagreed/strongly 
Control Intervention 
Men should have the final say in all family matters 34 (19.0%) 104 (51.2%) 
There is nothing a woman can do if her partner wants 43 (47.3%) 81 (80.2%) 
to have other girlfriends N=91 N=101 
A wife should tolerate being beaten to keep the 59 (46.5%) 72 (61.0%) 
family together N=127 N=118 
A woman needs her husband’s permission to work 31 (14.4%) 68 (30.4%) 
It’s a woman’s job to take care of her home and cook 37 (17.5%) 94 (42.3%) 
for her family. N=212 N=222 
Source: Mbwambo and Maman, 2007. 
The baseline surveys recorded information 
regarding demographics, gender roles and 
norms, attitudes toward and experiences of 
violence, HIV risk behaviors, and use of 
physical and sexual violence. The post-inter-vention 
assessment interviewed a total of 
315 men in the intervention community 
(62.6%) and 266 men in the control com-munity 
(59.4%). The post-intervention and 
baseline survey were identical in the control 
community, with an added section on inter-vention 
exposure for men in the intervention 
site. Female partners of 20 men were inter-viewed 
as part of the post-intervention 
assessment. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Two of the six variables measuring HIV-risk 
behaviors were found to be significant. Men 
in the intervention community were signifi-cantly 
more likely to have used a condom 
disagreed at endline 
N=179 N=203 
N=215 N=224 
during their last sexual experience and in 
the past six months. 
While there were no significant differ-ences 
regarding reported use of violence, 
the study did find improvement in attitudes, 
with men in the intervention village signifi-cantly 
less likely to report that violence 
against women is justified under various 
scenarios. 
Young men in the intervention commu-nity 
were significantly more likely to have 
favorably changed their attitudes regarding 
gender norms. In an interview, one 20-year 
old female partner said, “Yes, for example, 
our communication has become much bet-ter 
than the way it used to be; now he 
shows that he understands me and he 
agrees with most of the things which I 
advise him.” 
Limitations 
It was difficult to keep men engaged in the 
peer support component of the intervention, 
perhaps because in urban settings like Dar 
es Salaam many of the men migrate. In 
rural settings, where young men are less 
mobile, a 12-month program may be more 
successful in keeping men engaged. 
Conclusions 
This community-based communication 
intervention was designed to reduce rates of 
HIV-risk behaviors and reported use of vio-lence 
by young men. The evaluation showed 
some evidence that men had changed their 
behaviors related to condom use for HIV 
prevention. Though there were no signifi-cant 
changes in use of violence, results 
showed significant changes in norms and 
attitudes regarding violence among men in 
the intervention community. 
Youth who participated in the drama 
group portrayed stories that happened within 
their own community. The participatory 
nature of the community drama intervention 
demonstrated that solutions to combating 
HIV/AIDS are available from within the com-munity 
itself. Youth were able to develop a 
deeper understanding of HIV/AIDS and 
capacity to communicate about these issues 
with other community members. 
References 
R.K. Maganja, S. Maman, A. Groves, and 
J.K. Mbwambo. “Skinning the Goat and 
Pulling the Load: Transactional Sex Among 
Youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.” AIDS 
Care 19, no. 8 (2007): 974-981. 
Jessie Mbwambo and Suzanne Maman, HIV 
and Violence Prevention. Horizons Final 
Report (Washington, DC: Population 
Council, 2007). 
39 Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 39
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
In South Africa, gender norms influence 
male and female power dynamics, resulting 
in gender-inequitable intimate relationships. 
Norms limit women’s agency in many areas, 
including restricting their ability to negotiate 
sex and to demand condom use from their 
partners. This is particularly true of partners 
of migrant laborers who are most at risk of 
HIV and others STIs. Because educational 
and economic opportunities for women are 
limited, some women use transactional and 
commercial sex work as a survival strategy, 
and research has shown the link between 
these behaviors and increased HIV risk. 
Objective 
Stepping Stones is a gender-transformative 
HIV-prevention program that aims to 
improve sexual health through building 
stronger, more gender-equitable relation-ships 
with better communication between 
partners. 
Strategy 
The Stepping Stones intervention is imple-mented 
using participatory learning 
approaches in single-sex peer groups. The 
evaluation was implemented from 2003 
–2005. Eleven same-sex project staff mem-bers, 
slightly older than the participants, 
were trained for three weeks prior to imple-mentation. 
They facilitated the sessions 
(described below), employing adult educa-tion 
methods including role play, spider dia-grams, 
and similar exercises. 
The program contains 13 sessions, 
each three-hours long, and three peer group 
meetings. The issues covered in the 13 ses-sions 
include reflecting on love, sexual 
health joys and problems, body mapping, 
menstruation, contraception and conception 
(including infertility), sexual problems, 
unwanted pregnancy, HIV/STIs, safe sex, 
gender-based violence, motivations for sex-ual 
behavior, and dealing with grief and loss. 
The intervention relied on same-sex peer 
groups “as this format gives the best oppor-tunity 
for frank discussion and a supportive 
environment for exploring behaviour 
change.”77 The male and female groups 
were conducted in parallel sessions and 
came together in three meetings to present 
exercises and promote dialogue. During 
these three sessions, groups present exer-cises 
they have been working on that pro-mote 
dialogue and communication. 
The second intervention (the control 
arm) was a single two- to three-hour ses-sion 
with exercises about HIV and safer sex 
practices drawn from the Stepping Stones 
curriculum. 
Efforts were made to gain community 
support for the project by involving impor-tant 
stakeholders and holding community 
meetings. The project had an active commu-nity 
advisory board composed of members 
from Departments of Health and Education, 
from municipalities, local traditional leaders, 
40 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
the National Association for People with 
HIV/AIDS, the University of Transkei 
(UNITRA), and young people approximately 
the same age as study participants. 
Evaluation Design: Cluster 
randomized-controlled trial 
The evaluation was completed in 70 clusters 
(each cluster was usually a village) at least 
10 kilometers apart. Study participants 
included 1360 men and 1416 women, ages 
15–26 years. Study villages were assigned 
to receive either the complete Stepping 
Stones intervention or the single 2-3 hour 
session control. Participants were inter-viewed 
prior to the implementation and gave 
blood for an HIV and Herpes test. 
Participants were re-interviewed and re-tested 
12 and 24 months after the first 
interview. 
Qualitative research was completed in 
two of the clusters with 10 women and 11 
men. Each participant was interviewed prior 
to and after participating in Stepping 
Stones. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Women in the intervention arm had 15 per-cent 
fewer new HIV infections than those in 
the control arm [incidence rate ratio = 0.85 
(95% CI: 0.60, 1.20)] and 31 percent fewer 
Herpes infections [incidence rate ratio = 
HIV/AIDS/STI Case Study 
Intervention: 
Stepping Stones 
Country: South Africa 
Type of Intervention: HIV prevention 
Implementing Organizations: Medical Research Council 
77 Jewkes et al., 2006: 5.
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 41 
0.69 (95% CI: 0.47, 1.03)]. Neither was sig-nificant 
at the 5% level. 
Findings did, however, show significant 
improvement in a number of reported risk 
behaviors in men, with men reporting fewer 
partners and higher condom use, as well as 
less transactional sex, perpetration of inti-mate 
partner violence, and substance use. 
The same behavior changes were not found 
in women, and there was actually an 
increase in transactional sex. This finding 
could be linked to possible under-reporting 
of sexual activity by women at baseline. 
Gender Outcomes 
Qualitative data suggest that the intervention 
improved couple communication and 
increased men’s and women’s awareness 
that violence against women was wrong. 
Limitations 
The scope of the Stepping Stones interven-tion 
for the randomized control trial, includ-ing 
the age ranges included, was limited by 
resources available for the study and the 
evaluation. A large proportion of the partici-pants 
did not attend all the sessions and, 
therefore, the full impact of the intervention 
may have been underestimated. Another 
limitation is that an overly optimistic 
assumption about the reduction in HIV 
infections limits the statistical analysis due 
to a small sample size. 
Replication 
The Stepping Stones intervention was ini-tially 
developed for use in Uganda. Over the 
last 10 years the intervention has been used 
in 40 countries, adapted for at least 17 set-tings, 
and translated into at least 13 lan-guages. 
Stepping Stones has developed an 
adaptation guide, to provide guidance to 
organizations adapting the program for the 
first time or for organizations wishing to 
make changes to an existing Stepping 
Stones curriculum. 
Conclusions 
Evaluation of the Stepping Stones program 
suggests that the intervention reduced new 
HIV and other STI infections among women. 
The intervention showed significant 
improvement in reducing risk behaviors in 
men. The program has been widely repli-cated 
throughout the world, and translated 
into multiple languages. 
References 
Family Health International. “Barriers to HIV 
Prevention.” Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009, 
at www.fhi.org/en/HIVAIDS/pub/guide/cor-rhope/ 
corrbar.htm. 
R. Jewkes, M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. 
Dunkle, N. Khuzwayo, M. Koss, A. Puren, K. 
Wood, and N. Duvvury. "A Cluster 
Randomized-Controlled Trial to Determine 
the Effectiveness of Stepping Stones in 
Preventing HIV Infections and Promoting 
Safer Sexual Behaviour Amongst Youth in 
the Rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: Trial 
Design, Methods And Baseline Findings." In 
Tropical Medicine and International Health 
11, no.1 (2006): 3-16. 
R. Jewkes, M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. 
Dunkle, A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. “Impact 
of Stepping Stones on HIV, HSV-2 and 
Sexual Behaviour in Rural South Africa: 
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.” In 
British Medical Journal 337, no.71 
(2008):a506. 
R. Jewkes, M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. 
Dunkle, K. Wood, M. Koss, A. Puren, and N. 
Duvvury. Evaluation of Stepping Stones: A 
Gender Transformative HIV Prevention 
Intervention (Pretoria: MRC, 2007).
HIV/AIDS/STI Case Study 
Intervention: 
Program H 
Country: Brazil 
Type of Intervention: HIV/AIDS prevention 
Implementing Organizations: Instituto Promundo 
Costs: $35,856.97 (group education and lifestyle marketing campaign n = 258); and $21,060.28 (group education only 
n = 250). Cost analysis for replications of Program H has shown intervention costs to range from $25,000 - $50,000. 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
In Latin America there exist many traditional 
beliefs on masculinity, including that men 
have more and stronger sexual urges than 
women, men have the right to decide when 
and where to have sex, sexual and repro-ductive 
health issues are women's con-cerns, 
men have the right to outside 
partners or relationships, and men have the 
right to dominate women. These traditional 
macho beliefs promote inequitable intimate 
relationships and sustain and support risky 
behaviors among men who have internalized 
such norms. Women are often unable to 
negotiate safe sexual practices with their 
partners. Additionally, women are unlikely to 
carry out risk-reducing or protective behav-iors, 
such as carrying condoms with them, 
for fear of gaining a reputation of being pro-miscuous. 
Objective 
The study examined the effectiveness of 
interventions designed to improve young 
men’s (ages 14–25) attitudes toward gender 
norms and to reduce HIV/STI risk. 
Strategy 
The intervention focused on helping young 
men to question traditional norms related to 
masculinity and to discuss inequitable gen-der- 
related views and the advantages of 
more gender-equitable behaviors. It used 
group education activities that encouraged 
reflection on what it means to “be a man.” 
Intervention activities included two 
main components: a field-tested curriculum 
used in same-sex groups and a lifestyle 
social marketing campaign. One intervention 
site, Bangu, received both the group educa-tion 
and lifestyle social marketing campaign, 
and the second site, Maré, received only the 
group education component. 
The group education component con-tained: 
1) a 20-minute no-word cartoon 
video highlighting one man’s experiences 
from childhood to early adulthood; and 2) 
70 activities (role plays, brainstorming exer-cises, 
discussion sessions, and individual 
reflection) covering five themes (sexuality 
and reproductive health, fatherhood and 
care-giving, from violence to peaceful coex-istence, 
reasons and emotions [including 
communication skills, substance abuse, and 
mental health], and preventing and living 
with HIV/AIDS). Weekly two-hour sessions 
were held over a period of six months. Five 
male facilitators were trained on the ratio-nale 
for the intervention; intervention mate-rials; 
study objective, design, and 
methodology; timeline for group activities; 
and logistics. 
The social marketing campaign (a 
behavior change communication campaign) 
promoted a more gender-equitable lifestyle 
and HIV/STI/violence prevention at the com-munity 
level, reinforcing the messages given 
in the group education sessions. Peer pro-moters, 
young men recruited from the com-munity, 
helped to implement the campaign. 
They identified sources of information and 
cultural outlets in the community. They also 
developed intervention messages using radio 
spots, billboards, posters, postcards, and 
dances, about how “cool and hip” it was to 
be a gender-equitable man. Additionally, the 
campaign presented condom use and negoti-ation 
as elements of a gender-equitable life-style, 
aiming to increase the availability of a 
new condom brand (Hora H) through strate-gic 
distribution, including bars, community 
dances, and parties. 
Evaluation Design: 
Quasi-experimental control design 
The Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) Scale was 
used to determine men’s attitudes toward 
gender norms at baseline (n = 780) and 
post-intervention in three sites (two inter-vention 
and one control/delayed.) 
Multivariate logistic regression analyses for 
correlated data were used, controlling for 
age, family income, and education. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Findings indicate that improvements in gen-der 
norm scale scores were associated with 
changes in at least one key HIV/STI risk out-come 
(e.g., STI symptoms, condom use). 
For both intervention sites, positive changes 
in attitudes toward inequitable gender 
norms over one year was significantly asso-ciated 
with decreased reports of STI symp-toms 
(p < .001). In the intervention sites of 
Bangu and Maré, young men were approxi-mately 
four times and eight times less likely 
to report STI symptoms over time, respec-tively. 
A significant association was not 
found for condom use, but a trend in the 
4422 42 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 42
expected direction was seen in one interven-tion 
village. 
Gender Outcomes 
At six months, agreement with inequitable 
gender norms significantly decreased in 
both intervention sites (10 out of 17 items 
improved in Bangu and 13 out of 17 items 
improved in Maré). These positive changes 
were sustained at the one-year follow-up 
period. Only one out of 17 items improved 
in the control area. 
Limitations 
Similar to other interventions involving 
young men, Program H struggled with 
attendance issues. Nearly 30 percent of the 
participants attended the majority of the 
sessions, while more than 50 percent of the 
participants attended less than half. Work 
was the number one reason given for miss-ing 
a session. Among participants who 
attended the majority of the sessions and 
those who attended less than half, there 
were no significant differences in work sta-tus, 
age group, education level, number of 
sexual partners, and attitudes toward gender 
at baseline. Monitoring data showed that 
some groups had higher than average par-ticipation 
rates, and some facilitators were 
more successful in generating interest and 
consistent participation. 
Replication 
Program H has been replicated in several 
places throughout Brazil and the world. An 
evaluation of Yaari Dosti (Program H 
replicated in Mumbai, India, see page 33) 
showed similar gender outcomes, with 
significantly more men supporting gender-equitable 
norms. 
Two additional programs, Program M 
and Program D, have been developed utiliz-ing 
the same strategies as Program H to 
promote young women’s health and reduce 
homophobia, respectively. 
Conclusions 
The young men in the study, from three 
low-income communities (favelas) in Rio de 
Janeiro, started the study reporting substan-tial 
risk of HIV and STIs. Support for inequi-table 
gender norms and roles was 
significantly associated with HIV risk. The 
program resulted in significantly smaller 
percentages of young men supporting ineq-uitable 
gender norms. Significant improve-ments 
were also found in HIV/AIDS 
outcomes, including STI symptoms and 
condom use, particularly in the area with the 
combination of group discussions and 
social marketing. Decrease in support for 
inequitable gender norms was associated 
with decreased reports of STI symptoms. 
The positive changes in attitudes 
toward gender norms were equally signifi-cant 
for both groups of young men exposed 
to either the combination intervention or 
education activities alone. This implies that 
the group education component was likely 
most successful in addressing gender-related 
attitudes. However, findings show 
changes were often greater for young men 
exposed to the combined intervention. This 
highlights the importance of both interper-sonal 
and community-level communication 
strategies. 
Evaluation of Program H illustrates the 
link between gender-inequitable attitudes 
and HIV/STI risk behaviors and outcomes. It 
also shows that group education programs 
focusing on gender-equitable relationships 
and BCC campaigns combating inequitable 
gender norms can lead to more gender-equitable 
relationships and improved HIV/ 
STI outcomes. 
References 
J. Pulerwitz, G. Barker, M. Segundo, and M. 
Nascimento. Promoting More Gender-equitable 
Norms and Behaviors Among 
Young Men as an HIV/AIDS Prevention 
Strategy (Washington, DC: Horizons, 2006). 
R.K. Verma, J. Pulerwitz, V. Mahendra, S. 
Khandekar, G. Barker, P. Fulpagare, and S.K. 
Singh (2006). “Challenging and Changing 
Gender Attitudes Among Young Men in 
Mumbai, India.” Reproductive Health 
Matters 14, no. 28 (2006): 135. 
43 Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 43
Harmful Practices: Barriers 
to Reproductive Health 
Although the 2004 “So What?” report did 
not include a chapter devoted to harmful 
practices, this chapter has been added in this 
publication for two reasons: first, because of 
the substantial role of such practices in under-mining 
RH, especially among young women; 
and second, because some of the most innova-tive, 
gender-transformative work in the repro-ductive 
and sexual health field focuses on the 
reduction of harmful practices. Interventions 
are classified here by three types of harmful 
practices: early marriage and childbearing 
(EM&C); female genital mutilation/cutting 
(FGM/C); and gender-based violence, specifical-ly, 
intimate partner violence/sexual violence 
(IPV/SV). 
I. Early Marriage and Childbearing 
Early marriage and childbearing (EM&C) is asso-ciated 
with a wide range of negative social and 
health consequences. It is an abuse of girls’ 
human rights, robbing them of educational and 
economic opportunities as well as the chance 
simply to be children. In some settings, mar-riages 
are arranged in infancy and there is varia-tion 
in the age at which co-habitation begins. In 
other settings, both the husband and the wife 
are married in their teenage years. Often, how-ever, 
female brides are much younger than their 
husbands, and they are unready for sex, espe-cially 
with an older stranger. In these situations, 
sexual initiation after an early marriage often 
amounts to socially sanctioned rape, in some 
cases legal, and in others (where marriages take 
place before the statutory minimum age) techni-cally 
illegal but virtually never prosecuted. 
Early marriage almost always leads to early 
childbearing.78 About 15 million young women 
between 15 and 19 years of age give birth every 
year, accounting for over 10 percent of the 
births worldwide. Most of these young mothers 
are married.79 Early childbearing has been 
shown to contribute to mortality and morbidity 
during pregnancy, labor, and delivery, and 
increases the risk of premature births.80 It also 
contributes to rapid population growth. In 
countries where contraceptive use is at least 
moderately high, increasing the number of 
years between generations by increasing the 
age at which women begin having children may 
have a greater impact in reducing population 
growth than further reducing fertility rates.81 
EM&C Interventions 
The three EM&C interventions reviewed are 
broad in focus. All employed gender transfor- 
78 Adhikari, 2003. 
79 ICRW, 2004. 
80 UNICEF, 2001. 
81 Bongaarts, 1994; Caldwell and Caldwell, 2003. 
5 
Program Country 
EM&C: 
Behane Hewan Ethiopia 
Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ India 
Reproductive and Sexual Health 
CASE STUDY: India 
Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 
FGM/C: 
Navrongo FGM/C Experiment Ghana 
Awash FGM/C Elimination Project Ethiopia, Kenya 
Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C Ethiopia 
CASE STUDY: Senegal 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 
Gender-Based Violence: 
Soul City South Africa 
Through Our Eyes Liberia 
One Man Can Campaign South Africa 
CASE STUDY: Intervention with Microfinance South Africa 
for AIDS and Gender Equity (IMAGE) 
44 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Table 5.1 
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 45 
mative approaches and sought to influence atti-tudes 
and behaviors of a range of community 
stakeholders. One of them, Delaying Age at 
Marriage In Rural Maharashtra, is one of the 
case studies (see p. 52). It is a life skills educa-tion 
project with unmarried adolescent girls on 
a variety of topics. 
Table 5.1 lists the gender strategies used to 
reduce early marriage and childbearing in the 
projects reviewed. 
Behane Hewan82 
Country: Ethiopia 
Implementing organizations: Ethiopian Ministry of Youth and 
Sport, with the Amhara Regional Youth Bureau, and UNFPA, 
with technical assistance from the Population Council 
This pilot program in a village in rural Ethiopia 
sought to sensitize communities to the risks 
and disadvantages associated with child mar-riage, 
promote education to prevent early mar-riage 
among adolescents, and provide support 
for girls who were already married. The inter-ventions 
included social mobilization of adoles-cent 
girls who formed groups led by female 
mentors, with encouragement to stay in school, 
nonformal education and livelihood programs 
for out-of-school girls, community dialogue on 
early marriage and health issues affecting girls, 
and fiscal incentives to families who did not 
marry off their daughters during the project 
period. 
Using a quasi-experimental case control 
design, the Behane Hewan program evaluation 
focused on four areas of interest: education, 
social networks and participation, marital sta-tus, 
and RH. The evaluation results showed sig-nificant 
impacts in all four areas: 
n Girls in the intervention village were three 
times as likely to be in school as girls in the 
control village; 
n Knowledge and communication on HIV, 
STIs, and FP increased in the intervention 
village, compared with the control village; 
n Younger adolescents (ages 10-14) were 90 
percent less likely to be married than con-trol 
group girls of the same age; 
n Not a single girl ages 10-14 in the interven-tion 
area was married during the year 
between the two surveys (although marriag-es 
in this village accelerated after the age of 
15 years, probably because the expectation 
that girls should marry during adolescence 
persisted); and 
n Use of contraception among girls, which was 
at comparable levels in the two sites at the 
beginning of the project, was three times 
higher in the intervention village at the end 
of the project. 
Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent 
Girls’ Reproductive and Sexual Health Project83 
Country: India 
Implementing organizations: ICRW with Swaasthya 
This intervention was carried out by ICRW 
with Swaasthya in two urban slums in Delhi. 
The program provided life skills education for 
unmarried adolescent girls, focusing on girls’ 
age at marriage, self-esteem, and nutritional 
needs. The project in the first site, Tigri, ran 
from 1998-2001, followed by a sustainability 
study ending in 2005; a replication at the sec-ond 
site, Naglamachi, ran from 2003-2006. 
While the target participants for the program 
were unmarried girls, Swaasthya also included 
a component to encourage adults to be more 
supportive of adolescent girls and sensitive to 
their needs. 
The Building Life Skills Project was evalu-ated 
using baseline and endline surveys with-out 
control groups. In one site, the evaluation 
found that exposure to skills-building modules, 
social support, and one-on-one interaction with 
a Swaasthya fieldworker was associated with 
high knowledge of sexual and reproductive 
health among the unmarried girls and young 
82 Erulkar and Muthengi, 2009. 
83 Pande et al., 2006. 
Strategies Used to Reduce Early Marriage and Childbearing 
(EM&C) 
Encourage boys and girls to examine notions of gender 
Include messages about risks of early marriage and childbearing 
Increase skills of providers to reach young women and men 
Sensitize communities about EM&C 
Institute life skills for unmarried adolescent girls (nutrition, self-esteem, 
and age at marriage)
women involved in the project, a strong per-ception 
of support from mothers and other 
gatekeepers, and a positive perspective on life. 
In the second, more socially conservative site, 
the findings were weaker. The sustainability 
analysis in the first site showed that some out-comes, 
such as changes in knowledge, were 
largely sustained, but that the program inter-ventions 
were not continued by Swaasthya 
fieldworkers after outside support was with-drawn. 
Knowledge of sexual and reproductive 
health also decreased, suggesting that consis-tent 
input is needed to maintain knowledge 
among this target group. 
II. Female Genital Mutilation/ 
Cutting (FGM/C) 
The practice of FGM/C affects between 100 mil-lion 
and 140 million women and girls world-wide, 
most of whom live on the African 
continent. In some settings, the cutting is 
much more extensive than in others. The prac-tice 
of FGM/C tends to be associated with par-ticular 
ethnic groups more than with nations or 
religions, socio-economic status, or educational 
levels.84 In Kenya, for example, almost all 
women of reproductive age among the Somali, 
Kisii, and Maasai ethnic groups have undergone 
some type of FGM/C.85 Forms of FGM/C range 
from infibulation, the most severe, in which all 
external genitalia is removed and the vaginal 
opening is stitched and narrowed, leaving a 
small hole for urine and menstrual flow, to less 
extreme cutting in which the clitoris or clitoral 
hood is nicked or removed.86 FGM/C can lead 
to immediate complications, such as hemor-rhaging 
and infection. The more severe forms 
can lead to long-term effects, such as poor 
maternal and newborn health outcomes, pro-longed 
labor, and socially debilitating condi-tions 
such as malodorous urine retention or 
painful and difficult sexual relations with 
resulting problems between couples.87 
In the last two decades, FGM/C has gained 
international recognition as a health and 
human rights issue and funding for interven-tion 
projects and research has increased. The 
most promising approaches include commu-nity- 
based solutions and addressing rights as 
well as the social, legal, economic, and health 
dimensions of FGM/C. Several donor organiza-tions 
46 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
have reached consensus about the most 
effective approach to FGM/C interventions, as 
articulated in “Toward a Common Framework 
for the Abandonment of FGM/C”.88 
FGM/C Interventions 
The four FGM/C projects reviewed are all set in 
Africa, and all four approaches are gender 
transformative to some extent. The projects 
combine FGM/C interventions with interven-tions 
on other topics and all have emphasized 
community involvement, taking into account 
community attitudes regarding gender roles. 
The case study presented here is Tostan’s 
Community-Based Education Program. This 
Senegalese NGO project seeks to transform cul-tural 
norms rather than just behavior (see p. 
54). Tostan, plus two of the other interventions 
— by Navrongo and CARE — have been exten-sively 
evaluated, while IntraHealth’s interven-tion 
in Ethiopia had a much more limited 
evaluation. 
Table 5.2 lists the gender strategies used in 
the projects to reduce FGM/C that were 
reviewed. 
Navrongo FGM/C Experiment89 
Country: Ghana 
Implementing organizations: Navrongo Health Research 
Center (NHRC) 
This project employed a mixed gender strat-egy— 
transformative in attempting to influence 
cultural expectations regarding girls and 
women, but also accommodating gender expec-tations 
by training girls in domestic tasks as 
they would be trained as part of the rituals sur-rounding 
FGM/C. The objective of the project 
was to accelerate abandonment of FGM/C in six 
villages of the Kassena-Nanka district of 
Northern Ghana. The project employed a 
strong community engagement and mobiliza-tion 
component, using an approach known 
locally as alagube (“connoting the process by 
84 Chege et al, 2004; see also PRB, 2008. 
85 Kenya DHS, 2003. 
86 WHO, 2008. 
87 See H. Jones et al., 1999; L. Morison et al., 2001; WHO, 
2006; PRB, 2008. 
88 UNICEF, 2007. 
89 Feldman-Jacobs and Ryniak et al., 2006.
Table 5.2 
Strategies Used to Reduce Female Genital Mutilation/ 
Cutting (FGM/C) 
Promote model for change: girls right to education; women’s union to 
demand rights; strengthening women’s position in the family 
Influence cultural expectations regarding girls and women 
Train girls in domestic tasks they would learn as part of FGM/C rituals 
Promote dialogue between women and men on gender and FGM/C health-related 
issues 
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 47 
which people solve a common problem by pool-ing 
their individual and community social 
resources”).90 The target audience (women and 
adolescent girls) was involved in one of three 
sets of activities: 1) FGM/C-related education 
alone; 2) livelihood and development activities 
alone (such as learning how to do handicrafts 
or about micro-lending); and 3) a combination 
of FGM/C education and livelihood and devel-opment 
activities. In both the education and 
livelihood and development sessions, women 
and girls met in large groups (70 participants) 
twice monthly for two-hour sessions. 
The project used a “4-cell experiment” design, 
with each cell, or community, receiving one of 
four interventions: 1) No intervention or control 
group; 2) education activities; 3) livelihood and 
development activities; 4) combination of educa-tion 
and livelihood and development activities. 
A baseline survey covered 3,221 respondents; 
follow-up surveys were undertaken each year 
between 1999 – 2003 to monitor and evaluate 
outcomes. Cox Proportional Hazard regression 
models were used to analyze the survey data 
and measure the impact of the interventions on 
girls’ likelihood of being cut. The results of the 
analysis indicate impressive reductions in 
FGM/C in the experimental groups: one year of 
the FGM/C education strategy was associated 
with a 93 percent decrease in the risk of being 
cut; one year of the combination education 
plus livelihood was associated with a 94 per-cent 
decrease in the risk, compared to the con-trol 
group. However, substantial reductions of 
FGM/C in the comparison area plus the reliabil-ity 
of self-reporting on a practice that is against 
the law in that country, raise questions about 
the validity of the responses. 
Awash FGM/C Elimination Project91 
Country: Kenya and Ethiopia 
Implementing organizations: CARE with local organizations 
and Population Council 
This project sought to empower women to 
attend and participate in meetings to discuss 
health-related issues with their male partners. 
Set in six villages in Ethiopia and two refugee 
camps in Kenya, the project focused on behav-ior 
change communication (BCC) education 
and advocacy, with an emphasis on creating 
dialogue between women and men on FGM/C 
and other topics related to health and gender, 
and strengthening spousal communication 
regarding family planning. A variety of commu-nication 
channels were used: a) meetings with 
community groups, women’s groups, health 
education groups, and schools; b) performances 
by popular theatre groups; c) evening video ses-sions 
that showed recorded discussions by reli-gious 
leaders speaking out on FGM/C issues; 
and d) mass media activities. CARE believed 
that the feasibility of these projects depended 
on FGM/C being linked with a broader set of 
RH issues rather than as a stand-alone inter-vention, 
thus reducing the danger of it being 
seen as an agenda imposed by outsiders. 
The Population Council/FRONTIERS con-ducted 
an operations research study that com-pared 
two Awash interventions, each with a 
control group. Using a quasi-experimental 
design, the intervention sites were purposively 
selected to correspond to Awash FGM/C 
Elimination project areas and nearby sites were 
selected for comparison purposes. The actual 
intervention, which began with the introduc-tion 
of expanded (in Kenya) and new (in 
Ethiopia) FGM/C abandonment activities, 
occurred over a 21-month period from January 
2001 through June 2002 (in Kenya) and 
October 2002 (in Ethiopia). The study assessed 
the effectiveness of BCC and advocacy activi-ties 
versus no interventions in Ethiopia, while 
in Kenya the comparison was between BCC 
strategies alone and the combination of BCC 
and advocacy activities. 
The interventions were more successful in 
Ethiopia than Kenya. In all knowledge and atti- 
90 Feldman-Jacobs and Ryniak et al., 2006. 
91 Care, 2005.
tude indicators assessed, the intervention site 
in Ethiopia showed more positive change than 
Kenya, and it is not clear if the advocacy strat-egy 
added much value to the intervention in 
Kenya. Moreover, in Kenya the comparison site 
performed better on all attitude and intended 
behavior indicators. The evaluators attributed 
this unexpected result to a failure to implement 
the advocacy strategy effectively as well as to 
pre-existing socio-economic differences in the 
intervention and control populations. In both 
countries the study designs were not adhered 
to; project interventions as well as influences 
from outside the project affected the outcomes 
of interest. They also cited contamination in 
the study design in both Kenya and Ethiopia 
due to population movements into and out of 
the intervention and comparison areas. 
In both countries, there was active public 
debate on the merits of continuing the prac-tice, 
and some uncut girls, men, women, and 
families publicly stated that they did not want 
to continue the practice. In both countries, tra-ditional 
leaders began to address the issue of 
protection of those wishing to remain uncut, an 
area of adjudication never-before addressed. In 
Ethiopia, 70 elders made open declarations 
that their villages would henceforth not cut 
their daughters. 
Five-Dimensional Approach for the Eradication 
of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting92 
Country: Ethiopia 
Implementing organizations: IntraHealth International 
The objective of this multi-pronged project was 
to both increase knowledge about FGM/C and 
to change behavior. It encouraged women’s 
empowerment while acknowledging their lack 
of power by helping them to voice their con-cerns 
about FGM/C to influential men. 
Abandonment of FGM/C was addressed through 
five perspectives: health, gender, law/human 
rights, religion, and information. IntraHealth 
emphasized community empowerment and 
mobilization along with advocacy to encourage 
long-term sustainability. Undertaken from 
2003-2005, the project was introduced across 
eight sites in regions with higher than average 
prevalence of FGM/C (in one site it was as high 
as 99 percent). While the project was designed 
to include all community members with a stake 
in the practice of FGM/C, specific groups were 
identified and targeted through tailored inter-ventions. 
48 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
More than 4,200 community mem-bers, 
both men and women, participated in the 
project’s training, information, education, and 
communication community mobilization activi-ties, 
and many more were reached through 
related national and local media programs, 
including broadcasts on television and radio, 
and printed materials in local languages. 
Interventions included national and regional 
workshops, training of trainers, community 
leadership training and community mobiliza-tion, 
Public Declarations, and a religious lead-ers’ 
forum. 
As a result of one IntraHealth workshop, 
teachers, media, and religious leaders joined 
together to make a public declaration that they 
would work to stop gender inequities and 
oppression and the practice of FGM/C. The 
project also formed associations of non-circum-cised 
girls and mothers of non-circumcised 
girls as well as a community network to protect 
girls from FGM/C and report any occurrence to 
the regional gender bureau and police station. 
The qualitative evaluation conducted by 
IntraHealth included focus group discussions 
with community leaders and suggested a 
change in attitudes regarding marriage to non-circumcised 
girls. However, there was no sub-stantiation 
of attitudinal or behavior change. 
Plans to do a quantitative evaluation were dis-rupted 
by calls for a national election, which 
occupied many of the community leaders. 
III. Gender-Based Violence 
Gender-based violence, including intimate part-ner 
violence (IPV) and sexual violence (SV), 
are worldwide public health problems associ-ated 
with a wide range of negative physical, 
psychological, social, and economic conse-quences 
for abused women themselves and for 
children whose mothers are exposed to vio-lence. 
93 The reported prevalence of IPV/SV var-ies 
considerably across settings. A 
multi-country WHO study reported rates as 
92 Feldman-Jacobs and Ryniak et al., 2006. 
93 Garcia-Moreno et al., 2005; Heise and Garcia-Moreno, 
2002; Heise, Ellsberg, and Gottemoeller, 2002; Heise, 
Pitanguy, and Germain, 1994.
Table 5.3 
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 49 
high as 71 percent in rural Ethiopia and 
between 21 and 47 percent in most countries.94 
In analyses of data from the Demographic and 
Health Surveys (DHS) conducted between 1995 
and 2004 in 12 countries, prevalence of domes-tic 
violence ranged from 18 to 53 percent.95 
Gender-Based Violence Interventions 
The gender-based violence (GBV) interventions 
featured here focused on intimate partner vio-lence 
(IPV), physical violence perpetrated by 
men against their female partners, as well as 
sexual violence (SV). Although psychological 
violence is also a common form of IPV/SV, none 
of the interventions directly addressed it, per-haps 
because it tends to be more subjectively 
defined and, therefore, difficult to measure. 
Like many of the EM&C and FGM/C interven-tions 
described above, the projects with docu-mented 
success in addressing IPV/SV also 
adopted multi-sectoral, multi-dimensional 
approaches to reducing harmful practices. All 
of the evaluated interventions that were found 
on IPV/SV were gender transformative in 
nature as they sought to change a harmful 
behavior rooted in gender inequality. They all 
were situated in Africa, particularly in South 
Africa, where rates of IPV/SV are among the 
highest in the world.96 
Only one of the four interventions discussed 
in this GBV section focuses primarily on engag-ing 
men: the One Man Can Campaign in South 
Africa. The objective of this project is to stop 
IPV/SV, promote healthy relations, and prevent 
HIV/AIDS. (Another example from South Africa, 
“Men as Partners,” is described in the chapter 
on HIV/AIDS; and “Visions,” a nonformal educa-tion 
program for youth in Egypt described in the 
youth chapter, also includes the topic of IPV/ 
SV.) Soul City and IMAGE (case study, p. x) had 
the most rigorous evaluations. 
Table 5.3 lists the gender strategies 
employed in the projects reviewed to reduce 
IPV/SV. 
Soul City97 
Country: South Africa 
Implementing organizations: South African Soul City Institute 
for Health and Development Communication (a multi-media 
health promotion project) working with the National Network 
on Violence Against Women 
This project began with the premise that 
behavior change interventions aimed solely at 
individuals have limited impact. Soul City, 
therefore, sought to influence women and men 
at multiple mutually-reinforcing levels — indi-vidual 
and community as well as socio-political 
environment — through prime-time radio and 
television dramas and print material. This 
method has been dubbed “edutainment,” 
where social issues are integrated into enter-tainment 
formats such as television and radio 
to reach marginalized rural communities in 
particular. 
Domestic violence was the major focus in 
Soul City’s fourth television and radio series, 
aired between July and December 1999. The 
intervention sought to create an enabling envi-ronment 
for behavior change by advocating for 
the implementation of the 1998 Domestic 
Violence Act (DVA). The series provided role 
models for the use of the DVA and a helpline 
was established to provide more information. 
The series also promoted interpersonal and 
community dialogue and encouraged collective 
efficacy and action to shift social norms, 
increase supportive behavior, and link people 
to sources of support. At the individual level, 
the intervention aimed to influence knowledge, 
awareness, attitudes, self-efficacy, intention to 
change, and practices. 
94 Garcia-Moreno et al., 2005. 
95 Kishor and Johnson, 2004. 
96 Mathews et al., 2004. 
97 Usdin et al., 2005. 
Strategies Used to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence/ 
Sexual Violence 
Engage men to stop violence against women through participatory work-shops 
and community interventions 
Institute microfinance-based poverty alleviation programs and participatory 
trainings 
Address individual, community, and socio-political levels – ‘edutainment’ 
Amplify voices from within the community through participatory community 
engagement in producing video tapes on IPV/SV and health issues 
Create action kits to engage men in stopping violence against women
The evaluation of Soul City was multifac-eted, 
consisting of several inter-related studies, 
triangulated to improve validity of the results. 
These included national-level pre/post surveys 
and a qualitative impact assessment using 29 
focus groups and 32 in-depth interviews. The 
evaluation showed an impact on attitudes, 
help-seeking behaviors, and participation in 
community action, though not in the actual 
incidence of IPV/SV.98 There was a shift in 
knowledge regarding domestic violence, with 
41 percent of respondents gaining knowledge 
about the project’s helpline. Attitudinal shifts 
following the intervention include a 10 percent 
increase in respondents disagreeing that IPV/ 
SV is a private affair and a 22 percent shift in 
perceptions of social norms regarding IPV/SV. 
Differences between male and female respon-dents 
on these outcomes were not reported. 
The evaluation concluded that 1) the inter-vention 
played a decisive role in implementa-tion 
of the Domestic Violence Act, and 2) a 
strong association existed between exposure to 
the intervention and a number of factors indic-ative 
of and necessary to bring about social 
change. 
Through Our Eyes99 
Country: Liberia 
Implementing organizations: The American Refugee 
Committee (ARC) and Communication for Change 
This is a unique behavior change project set in 
Liberian refugee camps and launched in 2006 
by Liberian refugees in Guinea with support 
from the American Refugee Committee (ARC) 
and its partner, Communication for Change. By 
producing video tapes on the subjects of IPV/ 
SV and health issues, which are played back to 
the community, it aims to amplify voices from 
within the community through participatory 
community engagement. The Liberia-based 
team has produced more than 30 videos and 
conducted dozens of playback sessions about 
such highly sensitive subjects as rape, forced 
marriage, teenage prostitution, unintended 
pregnancy, STIs, and equal rights for women 
and girls. Recent videos have focused on gen-der 
roles and women’s empowerment (e.g. 
“Making Family Decisions,” “Women are 
Roosters Too,” “Women Freedom in Society,” 
“Nennie Nyan Daa Porlie Gehye: Women Can 
Do It”), seeking to promote more nuanced and 
sustainable aspects of gender transformation 
that focus on shifting social and cultural norms. 
The intervention is being replicated in Asia and 
elsewhere in Africa. 
The evaluation of Through Our Eyes dem-onstrates 
50 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
a unique way to evaluate a project 
with little resources and considerable commu-nity 
involvement. It was conducted through 
focus group discussions during each video play-back 
session. The findings suggest an increase 
in women’s use of reproductive health services 
in target areas, and a reduction in stigma asso-ciated 
with discussing sexual violence and 
other matters related to women’s health and 
rights. They also suggest that the women felt 
more confident in articulating their concerns 
about IPV/SV and reproductive health, and 
pride in their new skills in making videotapes. 
(A series of formal participatory evaluations are 
being planned.) 
One Man Can (OMC) Campaign100 
Country: South Africa 
Implementing organizations: Sonke Gender Justice 
The One Man Can Campaign, a partnership on 
HIV and gender violence in southern Africa, is 
a flagship initiative of the South African NGO 
Sonke Gender Justice (Sonke). Begun in 2006, 
it encourages and supports men and boys to 
take action to stop IPV/SV and to promote 
healthy, equitable relationships between men 
and women. OMC has been implemented in all 
of South Africa’s nine provinces as well as in 
several other southern African countries (in 
the latter, by partner organizations). By July 
2007, through the implementation of 10 OMC 
projects, Sonke had trained 465 people in six 
provinces to implement OMC activities; had 
conducted two 4-day workshops for more than 
2,000 people in six provinces; and had reached 
tens of thousands of people through commu-nity 
OMC partnerships. 
98 Impact on actual incidence of IPV/SV is problematic to 
measure in the context of an intervention project, in any 
case, because such interventions typically encourage 
women who have kept their abuse secret to openly discuss 
their situations. 
99 Information from www.c4c.org/eyes.html 
100 Peacock, 2008.
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 51 
The OMC project interventions were devel-oped 
based on results from formative research 
that included literature reviews, surveys, and 
focus group discussions with survivors of vio-lence, 
faith-based leaders, and teachers and 
coaches. The surveys asked boys and men how 
they understood the problem of men’s violence 
against women and what they would be willing 
to do about it. 
Based on the findings, Sonke developed a 
kit to provide men with resources to act on 
their concerns about domestic and sexual vio-lence. 
This Action Kit includes such materials 
as stickers, clothing, posters, music, video 
clips, and fact sheets, and provides specific 
information and strategies on how men can 
support a survivor, use the law to demand jus-tice, 
educate children early and often, chal-lenge 
other men to take action, make schools 
safer for girls and boys, and raise awareness in 
churches, mosques, or synagogues. Sonke 
implements OMC workshops with groups of 
men in communities across South Africa and 
has provided training on the OMC Campaign to 
a broad range of key stakeholders including 
government departments at the national and 
provincial levels, traditional healers, faith-based 
leaders, the police, youth service organizations, 
in- and out-of-school youth, teachers, and other 
CBOs and NGOs. Groups of men and boys 
attend workshops and develop community 
teams to put the training into action. 
Phone surveys with a random sample of 
program participants and routine data collec-tion 
from government sources and NGOs were 
completed to evaluate a number of behavioral 
outcomes. Results showed positive results, with 
91 percent of participants who had witnessed 
domestic violence reporting it to authorities 
(police, community structure, NGOs). Sixty-one 
percent of respondents also reported that 
they had increased their condom use after 
attending a workshop. 
Pre/post tests in connection with specific 
workshops suggested dramatic attitudinal 
changes. For example, pre/post test results 
from a workshop with members of a traditional 
court showed that before the workshop, 100 
percent of the male respondents believed that 
they had the right, as men, to decide when to 
have sex with their female partners. This 
dropped to 25 percent after the workshop. In 
another case, 63 percent of participants from a 
local tribal authority said they believed that, 
under some circumstances, it is acceptable for 
men to beat their female partners. Post-workshop, 
83 percent of respondents disagreed 
with this statement. Similarly, before the work-shop, 
96 percent of the participants believed 
that they should not interfere in other people’s 
relationships even in cases of violence. After 
the workshop, all participants said they 
believed that they should interfere.
Harmful Practices Case Study 
Intervention: 
Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 
Country: India 
Type of Intervention: Life skills program 
Implementing Organizations: ICRW with Institute of Health Management, Pachod (IHMP) 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
In rural Maharashtra, there are few alterna-tives 
to marriage for young girls. Parents are 
reluctant to send girls to school because of 
safety concerns, and outside employment 
opportunities for women are very limited. In 
order to ensure a daughter will be taken care 
of in the future, parents are anxious to find a 
suitable husband. Her consent is often not 
taken, and she is often married to a much 
older man. This marriage arrangement cre-ates 
significant power imbalances between 
the girl and her husband, leaving her vulnera-ble 
to many harmful outcomes. For example, 
she may be unable to negotiate contraceptive 
use or she and her husband may not have 
access to appropriate information about fam-ily 
planning. Thus, early marriage often leads 
to early child bearing. The age difference also 
means that girls are at greater risk of HIV 
from their husbands, who may be more sex-ually 
experienced. 
Objective 
The intervention study sought to test the 
effectiveness of a life skills program in 
increasing girls’ self-esteem and literacy and 
delaying age at marriage in Maharashtra. 
Strategy 
The program specifically addressed gender-related 
barriers by trying to improve the 
social status of adolescent girls through 
increasing their skills related to gender, legal 
literacy, and team building. The life skills 
training approach recognizes that early mar-riage 
and poor sexual and reproductive 
health are closely linked with girls’ low self-esteem, 
social vulnerability, and limited life 
options. The program was implemented in 
multiple year-long phases, with one-hour 
education sessions held each weekday eve-ning. 
This case study focuses on the first 
implementation year completed in 1998 – 
1999. It targeted unmarried adolescent girls 
ages 12 – 18, focusing on out-of-school and 
working girls. 
The sessions concentrated on improv-ing 
the girls’ skills and knowledge in the fol-lowing 
areas: Social Issues and Institutions, 
Local Bodies (i.e. local government and civil 
society structures), Life Skills, Child Health 
and Nutrition, and Health. One example of 
an activity in the life skills course is the edu-cation 
practicum, in which girls in the com-munity 
conduct an informal education 
course, such as teaching literacy skills to 
non-participating girls. 
Parents were engaged throughout the 
development of the program and implemen-tation 
of the intervention. IHMP organized 10 
focus group discussions with mothers and 
their unmarried daughters in order to develop 
the program’s content. Once IHMP had devel-oped 
the curriculum, parents were given the 
opportunity to learn about it, give feedback, 
and participate in monthly meetings. 
52 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Already established village develop-ment 
committees collaborated with IHMP to 
recruit and hire teachers for the life skills 
program. The teachers were required to 
have at least seven years of formal educa-tion 
(the same level required for the village-based 
anganwadi, workers in the 
State-operated Integrated Child 
Development Services) so the program 
could be replicated throughout the country 
if successful. 
Evaluation Design: 
Quasi-Experimental pretest-posttest 
control group design 
The study compared 17 intervention and 18 
control villages, with a total of 1,146 partici-pants. 
Two noncontiguous primary health 
centers (PHC) were randomly assigned to 
the intervention and control group. Each 
PHC was broken down into smaller geo-graphical 
units, each with a population of 
1,000 – 1,500, with 17 and 18 units making 
up the intervention and control groups 
respectively. The girls were grouped accord-ing 
to their level of participation in the pro-gram, 
and ranged from not attending to fully 
attending. Teachers tracked the participants 
for one year following completion of the life 
skills course, noting who married within that 
year.
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 53 
Table 5.4 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Comparing only the girls who participated 
fully in the life skills program and a ran-domly 
selected group from the control area, 
logistic regression analysis indicates that 
the control group was four times more likely 
to marry before 18 than the group who fully 
participated. 
From the study sample, nine percent of 
the girls who completed the course were 
married before the age of 18 years, com-pared 
to almost 30 percent of the girls who 
never attended. Logistic regression shows 
that, controlling for background characteris-tics, 
girls who never attended the course 
were more than two-and-a-half times as 
likely to get married before age 18 com-pared 
to girls who completed the course. 
These findings show that the program 
significantly delayed marriage of both pro-gram 
participants and nonparticipants in the 
intervention areas as a whole. The median 
age at marriage rose from 16 to 17 years 
from 1997–2001, and the proportion of 
marriages to girls younger than 18 dropped 
from 81 percent to 62 percent. There was 
no significant change in the control group. 
Gender Outcomes 
Qualitative interviews suggested that after 
attending the life skills course, girls acted 
more confidently and autonomously. They 
influenced household decisions, including 
decisions regarding their own marriage, 
spoke without hesitation or fear, demon-strated 
more self-discipline, and were more 
independent in daily activities. A pre- and 
post-test of the life skills course showed 
that while the intervention and control group 
had similar pre-test scores, only the inter-vention 
group exhibited significant changes, 
with correct answers increasing by 1.5 to 
3.0 times. 
Scale-up 
By the end of the study, the state govern-ment 
of Maharashtra had adapted and 
scaled up IHMP’s life skills model for rural 
Maharashtra. 
Conclusions 
The evaluation suggests that the life skills 
program provided the girls with skills and 
knowledge that increased their confidence 
and helped them to become more involved 
in household decisions, including decisions 
regarding their own marriage. Inclusion of 
parents in developing program content and 
implementation helped to achieve broad 
community support, evidenced by delayed 
marriages occurring within the whole inter-vention 
area, not just among program par-ticipants. 
References 
R. Pande, K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. Macquarrie, 
and S. Jain, Improving the Reproductive 
Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in 
India: Evidence of Effectiveness and Costs 
from Community-based Interventions. Final 
Report of the Adolescent Reproductive 
Health Program in India (New Delhi: ICRW, 
2006). 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Attendance # of girls % married < 18 yrs Adjusted OR+ 
Complete 166 9.1 1 (reference) 
Partial 243 22.6 2.42* 
None 737 29.3 2.58* 
N=1146; *p<0.05; +Adjusted for girls’ age, current schooling status, education, SES, family type, 
mother’s education, parents’ occupation 
Source: ICRW, Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra.
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Female genital cutting (FGC)101 is a common 
practice throughout Senegal. The practice of 
FGC is perpetuated by the belief that it is a 
rite of passage to womanhood and neces-sary 
for suitable marriage prospects. 
Because of these factors, mothers often 
believe they are acting in their daughters’ 
best interests. Because it is culturally 
expected for women to undergo FGC, it may 
be difficult for individuals to stand up to this 
social norm. 
Objective 
Tostan’s goal was to help communities, 
especially women, improve living and health 
conditions, and to mobilize villages to hold 
public declarations supporting the abandon-ment 
of harmful practices, particularly FGC 
and child marriage. 
Strategy 
Tostan seeks to empower people to make 
informed decisions for the benefit of their 
personal and community development. The 
educational program includes modules on 
human rights, problem solving, environmen-tal 
hygiene, and women’s health. Through 
participatory educational methods for com-munication 
of technical information, discus-sion 
of human rights issues, and 
development of strategies for social trans-formation, 
the NGO hopes to improve the 
confidence and self-determination of 
women. 
Implementation of the program typi-cally 
follows six phases over the course of 
18-24 months. In the first, a village sets up 
a committee to adapt and manage the pro-gram. 
In the second phase, about 30 partici-pants 
in each village receive training and 
Prevalence of FGC Among Daughters of Participants 
Participants in intervention area 87% n = 550 84% n=340 79%* n=353 
Non-participants in intervention area 85% n=213 78%* n=199 
Comparison Group 93% n = 272 -- 89% n = 232 
* Statistically significant at p<0.05 
education courses three times a week for 
two hours each covering hygiene, women’s 
health, human rights, and problem-solving. 
Training emphasizes enabling participants to 
analyze their own situation and find the best 
solution. In the third and fourth phases, 
trainees share what they are learning with 
others, and the group begins to organize 
public discussions around issues identified 
by the trainees. Participants serve as dis-cussion 
leaders and facilitate a process of 
community consensus-building in renounc-ing 
FGC. In the fifth phase, community 
members reach out and spread educational 
activities to neighboring villages. Finally, a 
group of villages organizes a public declara-tion 
to indicate their collective intention to 
renounce harmful practices 
Evaluation Design: Quasi-experimental 
case-control design 
A quasi-experimental control design was 
used to evaluate differences between men 
and women in 20 intervention and 20 con-trol 
villages. At baseline, 576 women, 373 
men, and 895 daughters were surveyed in 
the intervention villages. In the control vil-lages, 
199 women, 184 men, and 396 
daughters were surveyed. 
54 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Baseline Post-intervention Endline 
In the intervention villages, a survey 
was administered to both participants and 
non-participants (immediately before the 
intervention at baseline, immediately after 
the intervention, and two years after the 
intervention/endline). Those living in the 
control villages were interviewed twice, at 
baseline and endline. In addition, qualitative 
data were collected to gauge the community 
mobilization process and people’s percep-tions, 
attitudes, and behaviors. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
The prevalence of FGC among daughters at 
baseline was 87 percent and 93 percent for 
the intervention and control groups, respec-tively. 
By the endline, FGC prevalence 
among daughters of women in the interven-tion 
group had significantly declined. No 
significant change could be seen in the 
comparison group (see table. 5.5). 
The proportion of women who thought 
FGC was necessary significantly declined in 
the intervention group. A decrease was also 
Harmful Practices Case Study 
Intervention: 
Tostan Community-Based Education Program 
Country: Senegal 
Type of Intervention: Community engagement and education program 
Implementing Organizations: Tostan; evaluation by Population Council. 
Table 5.5 
101 While USAID and many NGOs and donors 
refer to this practice as female genital 
mutilation/cutting or FGM/C, Tostan pre-fers 
to use what it considers the non-pejo-rative 
term of FGC, female genital 
cutting.
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 55 
Table 5.6 
found in the control group; however, the dif-ference 
in this change was less than in the 
intervention group (see table above). 
Awareness of at least two conse-quences 
of FGC significantly increased 
among men (from 11 to 83 percent) and 
women (from 7 to 83 percent) immediately 
after participating in the program, although 
it declined somewhat (to 66 percent for men 
and 70 percent for women) by the time of 
the endline survey. 
Among the majority of women partici-pating 
in the program who disapproved of 
FGC at the endline, 85 percent said that they 
had changed their mind after the Tostan 
program and 10 percent said their disap-proval 
dated back several years. 
In addition to FGC, the evaluation 
showed a wide range of positive RH out-comes 
including: 
• Significant declines in women’s per-sonal 
experience of violence during the 
last 12 months in both the intervention 
and comparison group (the intervention 
group declined significantly more than 
the comparison group); 
• Significant increase in knowledge of 
contraceptive methods by men and 
women in the intervention group; 
• Significant increase in awareness of 
STIs at endline by women participants 
and nonparticipants in the intervention 
villages (no increase was observed in 
the comparison group), and a signifi-cant 
increase in men who knew at least 
two kinds of STIs compared to the 
comparison group. 
Gender Outcomes 
After the intervention, there was a signifi-cant 
increase among women in the interven-tion 
groups who agreed with the statement 
that “girls ought to go to school” and 
agreed that women’s unions had a role in 
demanding rights. Levels were sustained 
through to the endline. The comparison 
group also revealed similar significant 
trends. 
Partner approval of contraceptive use, 
as perceived by the women, improved sig-nificantly 
in the intervention group. These 
levels were maintained at endline. 
Discussion with partners about family plan-ning 
was higher among the participants (30 
percent) than among the non-participants 
(17 percent). 
Limitations 
The evaluation showed improvements in a 
number of the measured RH outcomes in 
both the intervention and the comparison 
villages. For example, awareness of gender-based 
violence reached the same level of 
improvement in the comparison villages as 
in the intervention villages. This could be a 
result of changing social factors in the com-munity, 
as well as contamination because 
Tostan radio programs were broadcast 
throughout the region. 
Conclusions 
Knowledge about FGC issues among both 
men and women increased significantly dur-ing 
the study period. Those who participated 
in the education program increased their 
knowledge more than others living within 
the villages. Most disapproved of FGC and 
declared that they had no intention of cut-ting 
their daughters in the future. The same 
tendency was observed in the comparison 
group, but to a lesser extent, suggesting 
that there is a widespread shift in attitude, 
which this program may have accelerated in 
the intervention villages. 
Levels of awareness of family planning, 
pregnancy surveillance, child health, and 
STI/HIV issues increased after the program, 
and comparisons show a statistically signifi-cant 
increase by the intervention group over 
the comparison group for all but one health 
indicator. 
References 
N.J. Diop, M.M. Faye, A. Moreau, J. Cabral, 
H. Benga, F. Cisse, B. Mane, I. Baumgarten, 
and M. Melching. The Tostan Program: 
Evaluation of a Community Based Education 
Program in Senegal (New York: Population 
Council: 2004). 
Proportion of Women Who Thought FGC Was a Necessity 
Baseline Post-intervention Endline 
Participants 70% n = 550 21% 15% 
Non-participants 33% 29% 
Comparison Group 88% n = 272 -- 61%
Harmful Practices Case Study 
Intervention: 
Intervention with Microfinance for AIDS and Gender Equity (IMAGE) 
Country: South Africa 
Type of Intervention: Cross-sectoral 
Implementing Organizations: Small Enterprise Foundation (SEF) 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Intimate partner violence/sexual violence 
(IPV/SV) is highly prevalent across sub- 
Saharan Africa. Women living in poverty are 
more likely to suffer from violence. Evidence 
points to a link between violence and HIV/ 
AIDS status. In the Limpopo Province, 
acceptance by women of their husband’s 
extra-marital affairs is commonplace. 
Women often tolerate these behaviors from 
their husbands because they are the main 
income earners in the family and, therefore, 
have a position of authority in the house-hold. 
Additionally, men and women may 
have internalized norms that perpetuate 
male control and acceptance of violence. 
Objective 
The IMAGE project, implemented from 2001 
– 2005, sought to increase women’s 
empowerment through micro-lending, gen-der 
awareness, and HIV training, and to 
decrease women’s experience of IPV/SV. 
Strategy 
Women (ages 18 and older) who lived in the 
poorest households in each village were 
selected as participants using SEF’s partici-patory 
wealth-ranking criteria. The interven-tion 
included two strategies: a micro-lending 
program and a gender-focused training 
component called “Sisters for Life.” 
Microfinance Program. The IMAGE micro-lending 
program followed the Grameen 
model, and supported women’s new and 
existing business ventures. In this model, 
groups of five women acted as each other’s 
benefactor, and all women in the group had 
to repay their loans in order to move up to 
the next credit level. Women met every two 
weeks to repay their loans, apply for credit, 
and discuss their business plans. 
Sisters for Life Program. The gender aware-ness 
and HIV-training component was imple-mented 
in two phases alongside the 
microfinance program. Phase one consisted 
of 10 one-hour sessions on gender roles, 
cultural beliefs, relationships, communica-tion, 
domestic violence, and HIV infection, 
with the goal of strengthening communica-tion 
skills, critical thinking, and leadership. In 
phase two, women who were identified by 
their loan centers as “natural leaders” 
received additional training on leadership and 
community mobilization to lead initiatives in 
their own families and communities. Based 
on participatory learning and action (PLA) 
principles, phase two was an open-ended 
program that encouraged broad community 
mobilization to engage men and boys. 
Evaluation Design: 
Cluster randomized-control trial 
During the recruitment period of the evalua-tion, 
430 loan recipients and 430 matched 
control participants were enrolled. The 
multi-level evaluation was designed to mea-sure 
changes at the individual, household, 
and community level. Matched villages were 
randomly assigned to receive the interven-tion 
either at the beginning or the end of the 
evaluation period. Participatory wealth rank-ing 
was used to form matched experimental 
and control groups based on age and pov-erty 
level. Reproductive health data were 
collected, including sexual behavior and HIV 
status. Gender outcomes investigated 
included economic and social benefits, 
intra-household communication, decision-making, 
and gender relations. 
Nine empowerment indicators relevant 
to South Africa were used. Seven focus 
group discussions supplemented the quanti-tative 
data. 
56 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Researchers measured women’s expe-rience 
of IPV/SV during the past year, as 
well as two secondary outcomes, including 
experience of controlling behavior from 
partners and attitudes toward the accept-ability 
of IPV/SV. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
Results showed that experience of IPV/SV in 
the past year decreased by half in the inter-vention 
villages. An analysis of trends 
showed a consistent decrease in IPV/SV 
over time for all four intervention villages, 
whereas IPV/SV remained constant or 
increased in the control villages. The study 
also showed that, compared to the control 
group, at endline women in the intervention 
group reported less controlling behavior 
from their partners and less accepting atti-tudes 
toward violence. For the intervention 
group, there was not a substantial decrease 
from baseline to endline in experiencing 
controlling behavior (see table 5.7). 
Gender Outcomes 
The intervention measured a number of 
gender outcomes, including effects on eco-nomic 
well-being and empowerment. 
Participants in the intervention group 
reported increased assets, expenditures, and 
membership in savings groups. 
Participation in the intervention was 
associated with greater self-confidence and 
financial confidence, more progressive atti-tudes 
toward gender norms, increased 
autonomy in decisionmaking, greater part-ner 
appreciation of their household contri-bution, 
improved household 
communication, better partner relationships, 
and higher levels of participation in social 
groups and collective action (see table 5.8).
Table 5.7 
Baseline Follow-up (2 years 
after baseline) 
Intervention (%) Control (%) Intervention (%) Control (%) 
Intimate partner violence 
Experience of past year IPV/SV 11.4 9.0 5.9 12.01 
Progressive attitudes to IPV/SV … … 52.4 35.5 
Experienced controlling behavior 
by partner 34.7 22.5 33.7 41.7 
Source: Kim et al., 2007: 1974-1802. 
Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 57 
Table 5.8 
RH Outcomes 
Limitations 
Research has shown that women often 
underreport experiencing IPV/SV due to its 
sensitive and stigmatized nature. 
Willingness to disclose often increases as 
awareness increases of IPV/SV definitions 
and its prevalence. This reporting bias may 
have underestimated the impact of the inter-vention 
on IPV/SV. 
Scale-up 
The IMAGE project is currently being scaled-up 
in partnership with AngloPlatinum Mines 
in 150 villages. 
Conclusions 
The evaluation found women’s risk of physi-cal 
or sexual violence was reduced by more 
than half following the intervention, and 
improvements were shown in all nine dimen-sions 
of women’s empowerment measured in 
the study. The research team attributes these 
results to women’s enhanced ability to chal-lenge 
the acceptability of violence, their 
expectation of better treatment from male 
partners, their willingness to leave abusive 
relationships, and heightened public aware-ness 
about intimate partner violence. 
This intervention is noteworthy for com-bining 
development and health interventions 
to achieve reductions in IPV/SV. Achieving a 
strong partnership between the microfinance 
institute and HIV/AIDS prevention organiza-tion 
was key to the successful implementa-tion 
of this cross-sectoral intervention. 
References 
P.M. Pronyk, J.C. Kim, J.R. Hargreaves, 
M.B. Makhubele, L.A. Morison, C. Watts, 
and J.D.H. Porter, “Microfinance and HIV 
Prevention: Emerging Lessons from Rural 
South Africa,” in Small Enterprise 
Development 16, no.3(2005): 26-38. 
J.C. Kim, C.H. Watts, J.R. Hargreaves, L.X. 
Hdhlovu, G. Phetla, L.A. Morison, J. Busza, 
J.D.H. Proter, and P. Pronyk, “Understanding 
the Impact of a Microfinance-Based 
Intervention on Women's Empowerment 
and the Reduction of Intimate Partner 
Violence in South Africa,” in American 
Journal of Public Health 97, no.10(2007): 
1974-1802. 
Gender Outcomes 
Baseline Follow-up 
Intervention group 
Empowerment 
Greater financial confidence 45.5 72.0 
Challenging gender norms 37.4 61.2 
Autonomy in decisionmaking 27.7 57.1 
Taking part in collective action 41.0 75.7 
Economic well-being 
Estimated household asset value > 2000 rand 48.2 58.2 
Savings group membership 24.5 36.2
Meeting the Needs of Youth 
Nearly half of the world’s population is below 
the age of 25, including an estimated 1.2 bil-lion 
adolescents ages 10-19, and most of those 
young people live in developing countries.102 
Adolescence is a time of transition from child-hood 
to adulthood and, as such, is a critical time 
to provide young people with the knowledge and 
skills they need to ensure a lifetime of good sex-ual 
and reproductive health. Adolescents, and 
particularly adolescent girls, face a range of 
reproductive health risks once they become sex-ually 
active, including STIs, HIV/AIDS, and unin-tended 
pregnancy. Pregnancy is the leading 
cause of death for young women ages 15 to 19 
worldwide, with complications of childbirth and 
unsafe abortion leading the list.103 In 2007, an 
estimated 5.4 million young people (ages 15-24) 
were infected with HIV. Prevalence was highest 
in sub-Saharan Africa, where 90 percent of HIV-positive 
children live; young women in the 
region have rates that are even higher than 
those of young men.104 
6 
Program Country 
African Youth Alliance Ghana, Tanzania, 
Uganda 
Guria Adolescent Health Project Georgia 
Transitions to Adulthood - Adolescent Livelihoods India 
Training 
Transitions to Adulthood - Tap and Reposition Youth Kenya 
New Visions Egypt 
CASE STUDY: Ishraq Egypt 
CASE STUDY: First-time Parents India 
Gender and sexual norms are established 
early105 and dictate such things as when and 
with whom to have sex, and whether to use 
protection. Gender norms related to sex can 
have detrimental effects on men as well as 
women, particularly for STIs and HIV and for 
risk of violence.106 
Waiting to have sex, known as “delaying 
sexual debut,” can reduce the number of sexual 
partners and, therefore, reduce the risk of con-tracting 
HIV.107 Opinions vary on what are the 
appropriate programs for adolescents, ranging 
from teaching abstinence-only until marriage to 
providing comprehensive sex education 
(including means of protection from pregnancy 
and disease). Evidence has been available for 
quite some time that in countries with strong 
youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health 
services, the incidences of teenage pregnancy, 
abortion, and STIs are consistently much lower 
than in countries where these services are not 
available.108 
Interventions 
The seven interventions highlighted here 
focused on addressing gender norms, providing 
information, and building skills related to SRH. 
Readers should note that several of the inter-ventions 
in other chapters of this publication 
(particularly in Chapter 4, Reducing HIV/AIDS) 
are relevant to young people, risky behaviors, 
and negative health outcomes. 
All seven interventions undertook gender 
transformative approaches, in whole or in part. 
Four sought to improve adolescent reproductive 
health by promoting gender equitable norms. 
The two projects selected as case studies were 
Ishraq (enlightenment) in Egypt and the First-time 
Parents in India. Ishraq focused on devel-opment 
of life skills and opportunities for girls, 
while the First-time Parents sought to reach 
102 UN Population Division, 2008. 
103 WHO, 2004. 
104 See Children and HIV and AIDS at www.unicef.org/aids/. 
See also UNAIDS, 2007. 
105 Eggleston, Jackson, and Hardee, 1999; Blakemore, 2003 
106 See Pulerwitz, Barker, and Nascimento, 2006. 
107 Pettifor et al., 2004 , in Gay et al., 2005. 
108 Grunseit, 1997. 
5588 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
young married women with RH information 
and services, empowering them to address their 
own needs (see p. X). 
Table 6.1 lists the strategies employed by 
these programs to meet the needs of youth. 
The African Youth Alliance (AYA)109 
Country: Uganda, Tanzania, Ghana, and Botswana 
Implementing organizations: PATH, Pathfinder International, 
and UNFPA with funding by the Bill and Melinda Gates 
Foundation; Evaluation by JSI. 
The AYA project was designed to be an “inno-vative, 
collaborative and comprehensive pre-vention 
program” for improving adolescent 
(ages 10-24) sexual and reproductive health in 
four African counties.110 The intervention had 
six components: policy and advocacy coordina-tion; 
institutional capacity building; coordina-tion 
and dissemination; BCC, including life 
planning skills; youth friendly services; and 
integration of adolescent sexual and reproduc-tive 
health with livelihood skills training. There 
were three cross-cutting themes: gender; part-nerships; 
and active participation of youth. AYA 
program materials note that, “Gender-sensitive 
approaches are applied at different levels to 
challenge gender biases that exist at multiple 
levels and maintain unequal status, access, and 
life experience for males and females.”111 
John Snow, Inc. (JSI) evaluated the AYA 
project in three of the four countries (Uganda, 
Tanzania, and Ghana) using a post-intervention 
analysis to ascertain the impact of exposure to 
AYA’s comprehensive integrated program on 
sexual and reproductive health behavior among 
youth. The evaluation compared knowledge, 
attitudes, and behavioral outcomes between 
intervention and control sites and youth who 
were and were not exposed to the AYA inter-vention. 
The evaluation did not measure any 
gender outcomes. The analysis used two ana-lytic 
techniques for measuring impact using 
data collected at one point in time (cross-sec-tional 
Table 6.1 
Strategies to Meet the Needs of Youth 
Employ comprehensive approach addressing policy, community and 
individual levels 
Address structural issues and underlying factors affecting poor RH, 
including gender inequity 
Address notions of gender through community theater 
Empower rural, out-of-school girls and work with young males to promote 
life skills, including RH and gender equity 
Improve women’s economic prospects through livelihoods and microcredit 
(integrated with RH) 
Empower young married women with RH information and services 
Perform gender analysis throughout project development and 
implementation 
data): propensity score matching and 
instrumental variable regression. The evalua-tion 
found that AYA positively impacted a num-ber 
of variables, including contraceptive and 
condom use, partner reduction, and several 
self-efficacy and knowledge antecedents to 
behavior change. Areas in which there was lit-tle 
evidence of impact included delay of sexual 
debut and abstinence among females and 
males, and partner reduction among males. 
The impact of AYA was greater on young 
women than on young men. The evaluation 
concluded that AYA program approaches need 
to be refined to better reach young men. 
Guria Adolescent Health Project (GAHP)112 
Country: Georgia 
Implementing organizations: CARE 
This project was implemented in the Guria 
region of Georgia as part of a wider effort by 
USAID and CARE to strengthen underlying 
causes of poor family planning/reproductive 
health (FP/RH) in order to yield sustainable 
health outcomes. The Guria project used an 
inter-generational approach to “influence 
social, cultural and gender norms and inequali-ties 
[to] improve promotion of reproductive 
health rights and responsibilities of adults and 
adolescents.”113 This meant working with par-ents 
on how to involve adolescents in designing 
and implementing a program on sexual and 
reproductive health for young people. 
Meeting the Needs of Youth 59 
109 African Youth Alliance, 2008; see also Williams et al., 
2007. 
110 See www.jsi.com/Managed/Docs/Publications/Evaluation/ 
aya_evaluation_uganda.pdf, accessed online Dec. 1, 2009. 
111 AYA, 2008. 
112 CARE, 2005; CARE 2007. 
113 CARE, 2007, p. iii.
Components of the project included the use of 
youth and adult change agents; promotion of 
health education and social marketing; and 
implementation of micro-grants and youth-friendly 
services. 
This project was evaluated using baseline 
and endline surveys as well as through qualita-tive 
methods and document review. The evalu-ation 
found impressive changes in knowledge, 
attitudes, and behaviors in support of access to 
family planning information and services. The 
percentage of young women and men aware 
that it is possible to prevent unwanted preg-nancy 
nearly doubled from 50 percent to 93 
percent. Knowledge of contraception also 
improved, with young people knowing about 
more methods and more effective methods. 
The evaluation also found more support for 
adolescent rights, including protection of girls 
from kidnapping. The project promoted 
increased discussion of gender topics, most 
notably masculinity. 
Transitions to Adulthood— 
Adolescent Livelihoods Training114 
Country: India 
Implementing organizations: Population Council and 
CARE/India 
This project integrated a livelihoods component 
into an existing reproductive health project that 
had been serving adolescent girls and boys in 
the slums of Allahabad, India for years.The aim 
was to expand girls’ decisionmaking power 
through building and strengthening social net-works 
and developing financial and income-gen-erating 
capabilities. The livelihoods approach 
sought to provide skills to transform the ways 
girls perceive themselves and are perceived 
within their communities. Peer educators 
recruited adolescent girls to participate in the 
program. Girls in the experimental and control 
areas received information on RH; in the experi-mental 
areas girls also received vocational coun-seling, 
information on savings accounts, and 
follow-up support from a peer educator. 
The evaluation, conducted by the 
Population Council and the Centre for 
Operations Research and Training (CORT), 
used a pre- and post-test design, with baseline 
surveys of adolescents and one of their parents. 
It found that, as a result of the intervention, 
girls in the experimental areas were more likely 
to be members of a group and to know where 
unmarried women could safely congregate. 
These girls also scored higher on measures of 
social skills and self-esteem and knowledge of 
reproductive health. The project did not have 
an appreciable effect on gender role attitudes, 
girls’ mobility, girls’ expectations for work, or 
how the girls used their time. 
The evaluation of the livelihoods compo-nent 
noted that, while such a short-term proj-ect 
can raise awareness and change attitudes, it 
cannot be expected to change the structure of 
opportunities available for girls. It concluded 
that, in order to reduce deeply entrenched gen-der 
disparities that exist and enhance girls’ 
ability to have a greater voice in influencing 
their lives, future programs should include 
more contact with the girls and stronger efforts 
to develop group cohesion and to improve the 
communication, negotiation, and decision-mak-ing 
skills of adolescent girls. Since this evalua-tion, 
CARE-India has incorporated the 
livelihoods approach into its ongoing adoles-cent 
60 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
programs in India. 
Transitions to Adulthood— 
Tap and Reposition Youth (TRY)115 
Country: Kenya 
Implementing organizations: Population Council with K-Rep 
Development Agency (KDA). 
This savings and microcredit project, which 
also focused on gender attitudes, targeted out-of- 
school adolescent girls and young women in 
low-income and slum areas of Nairobi, Kenya. 
The objective was to improve adolescents’ live-lihood 
options as a way to reduce vulnerabili-ties 
to adverse social and reproductive health 
outcomes. The TRY model included group-based 
micro-finance, such as integrated sav-ings, 
credit, business support, and mentoring. 
The project was implemented first as a pilot 
project (1998–2000) and was then scaled-up 
and evaluated from 2001–2004. 
The evaluation was a quasi-experimental, 
pre- and post-test design, with surveys con-ducted 
at baseline and at the conclusion of the 
project. In total, 326 participants and their 
114 Sebastian, Grant, and Mensch, 2005. 
115 Erulkar and Chong, 2005.
Meeting the Needs of Youth 61 
matched controls were interviewed at baseline, 
and 222 pairs were interviewed again at endline. 
Compared to the control group, TRY partici-pants 
had significantly higher levels of income 
and household assets. TRY participants who 
saved, compared to control group savers, had 
significantly higher savings. TRY participants 
also shifted to more equitable gender attitudes. 
Their RH knowledge was not significantly 
higher, although the TRY participants had some-what 
greater ability to refuse sex and insist on 
condom use. At endline, TRY participants and 
controls held similar views on five of the eight 
issues, while TRY girls were significantly more 
liberal on three issues: that wives should be able 
to refuse sex, that marriage is not the best 
option for an unschooled girl, and that it is not 
necessary to have a husband in order to be 
happy. A score was calculated using responses to 
the gender attitude statements, with a maximum 
possible score of eight. At baseline, the aggregate 
gender score for controls was significantly 
greater than the TRY girls. At endline, however, 
TRY girls had marginally greater gender attitude 
scores at the level of p<0.1, suggesting the proj-ect 
may have had an impact on participants’ 
gender attitudes. 
The intervention faced challenges in meet-ing 
the diverse needs of different groups of ado-lescent 
girls. A significant number of 
participants, particularly younger adolescents, 
dropped out of the program. The experience 
from TRY suggests that rigorous micro-finance 
models may be an appropriate intervention to 
improve young girls’ economic opportunities 
and reproductive health outcomes for older and 
less vulnerable girls. For this subset of girls, the 
model appeared to be effective in improving 
girls’ status on a range of economic indicators. 
New Visions116 
Country: Egypt 
Implementing organizations: CEDPA and 216 local 
organizations 
In a survey carried out by CEDPA, 36 percent 
of young Egyptian males ages 12–20 could not 
name one mode of transmission for HIV/AIDS. 
According to a national survey, one out of three 
married women have been abused, and more 
than half of young boys thought a man was jus-tified 
in beating his wife in certain circum-stances. 
In response to this data, New Visions 
was designed to encourage the development of 
life skills and to increase gender sensitivity and 
RH knowledge among boys and young men ages 
12-20 in order to ultimately improve outcomes 
for girls and women. 
The New Visions course consisted of 64 ses-sions, 
each 1 ½ to 2-hours long, over a six-month 
period, facilitated by young college 
graduates. The curriculum contained messages 
related to gender equity, partnership with 
women, responsibilities to self, family and com-munity, 
and civil and human rights. Skills 
development included anger management, 
planning, negotiation, communication, and 
decisionmaking. The evaluation compared pre-and 
post-test responses of 1,477 New Visions 
participants. Outcome measures consisted of 
12 scales based on the subjects’ reported 
knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in: gender-equity 
attitudes, gender roles attitudes, gender-based 
violence attitudes, domestic violence 
attitudes, female genital mutilation/cutting atti-tudes, 
RH knowledge, HIV knowledge, male 
roles and MCH/FP attitudes, substance-related 
behavior, self-confidence, decisionmaking, and 
environmental behaviors. 
Results showed that exposure to the pro-gram 
was a highly statistically significant pre-dictor 
of better RH knowledge and attitudes 
outcome scores. There were significant changes 
in knowledge of a source of family planning and 
knowledge about HIV. At endline, only 11 per-cent 
of boys could not name one mode of HIV 
transmission, compared with 36 percent at 
baseline. Significant positive shifts were 
recorded in attitudes toward male-female inter-action, 
female genital mutilation, and gender-based 
violence. Respondents’ views on shared 
responsibility between men and women in fam-ily 
decisionmaking, community service, politi-cal 
participation, and household duties all 
improved; participants were more likely than at 
baseline to support equitable treatment for 
boys and girls regarding attire, work, and age of 
marriage. By engaging young men, who are 
often the gatekeepers to improving young girls’ 
health, the intervention was successful in 
improving RH and gender outcomes for both 
girls and boys. 
116 CEDPA, 2005.
Youth Case Study 
Intervention: 
Ishraq (“Enlightenment”) 
Country: Egypt 
Type of Intervention: Nonformal education 
Implementing Organizations: Save the Children, Population Council, the Egyptian-NGO CARITAS, and CEDPA 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Adolescent girls in Upper Egypt face many 
barriers to leading healthy and productive 
lives, including discrimination and social 
isolation. Twenty-six percent of girls ages 
13–19 in rural Upper Egypt have received 
two years or less of schooling. Community 
norms limit adolescent girls’ mobility and 
decisionmaking. Girls do not have access to 
safe meeting places outside the home and 
remain closely supervised until a husband is 
chosen for them. Early arranged marriages 
often lead to early childbearing and succes-sive 
pregnancies, perpetuating the cycle of 
isolation, illiteracy, and poverty into the next 
generation. 
Objective 
The Ishraq project aims to improve the life 
opportunities of rural out-of-school girls, 
13-15 years of age, in four villages in Minya 
Governorate. The project’s objectives are to 
improve literacy, recreational opportunities, 
livelihood skills, health practices, and mobil-ity; 
to influence policies and social norms 
regarding girls’ life opportunities; and to 
promote support for girls’ education. 
Strategy 
The three-year pilot initiative was carried out 
from 2001 – 2004. Prior to implementing 
the Ishraq intervention, the project identified 
community stakeholders and the necessary 
community structure in which to implement 
the project. Women “promoters” or interme-diaries 
were identified who would help the 
girls gain access to public spaces. Village 
committees were formed, composed of a 
broad range of stakeholders, who helped to 
support recruitment and program activities. 
To recruit adolescent girls to the pro-gram, 
Ishraq followed four strategies: word 
of mouth, public announcements, parents’ 
meetings, and home visits by promoters. 
The home visits played a critical role in 
increasing parents’ understanding of and 
comfort level with the program and, thus, 
allowing their daughters to participate. 
The Ishraq project consisted of four 
main components: 
1) Twice-weekly literacy classes for 24 
months that utilized the Caritas Learn to be 
Free curriculum as well as a core curriculum 
of Arabic and mathematics. The course also 
helped to prepare girls to sit for the national 
education entrance exam; 
2) CEDPA’s New Horizons life skills program 
that presented reproductive health informa-tion 
and basic life skills—girls attended two 
90-minute sessions each week for 12 
months; 
3) A sports and physical activity curriculum 
developed by Population Council to encour-age 
fun in a safe environment, develop 
social networks, and improve girls’ self-con-fidence. 
This was implemented in two 
phases, with the first introducing girls to 
traditional games (three months) and the 
second phase teaching table tennis and one 
team sport (10 months). The girls attended 
two 90-minute sessions each week; 
4) A home skills and livelihoods training pro-gram 
instructed girls on basic domestic skills 
as well as a choice of vocational skills devel-opment, 
including electrical appliance man-agement 
and repair, hairdressing (the most 
popular option), and sweets production. 
62 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Evaluation Design: 
Quasi-experimental design 
The evaluation compared the Ishraq partici-pants 
with a matched control group of ado-lescent 
girls. 
A household census was used to iden-tify 
eligible girls ages 13 to 15. A baseline 
survey was administered using a structured, 
individual questionnaire before the program 
was implemented. A mid-point survey was 
completed of girls who had joined the pro-gram 
at a later date, and an endline survey 
was completed of all baseline and midpoint 
respondents. In total there were 587 
respondents. 
In addition, focus group discussions 
and unstructured interviews were used to 
monitor the changes taking place in girls, 
the promoters, and families. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
One clear impact was a decline in support 
for FGM/C among girls who had participated 
in the program for a year. Evaluation results 
showed a significant decline (from 71% to 
18%) in percent of Ishraq girls who intend 
to circumcise their daughters in the future 
compared with the control group. One per-cent 
of program participants compared with 
76 percent of nonparticipants said they 
believed FGM/C was necessary. Girls who 
lived in the intervention villages but did not 
participate in the program showed a greater, 
though statistically insignificant, decline in 
support for FGM/C than the control village. 
This suggests that knowledge and attitudes 
may be shifting through peer networks. 
Differences in attitudes toward violence 
at endline were statistically significant: 64 
percent of program participants compared
Meeting the Needs of Youth 63 
Mean Scores on the Gender Role Attitudes Index, Baseline and 
Endline Surveys 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
to 93 percent of the control group believed 
that a girl should be beaten if she disobeys 
her brother. 
The proportion of girls preferring to 
marry before the age of 18 dropped sub-stantially 
among all groups, intervention and 
control. The longer the exposure to Ishraq, 
the greater the decline in the proportion of 
girls preferring marriage before age 18. 
Paired comparisons did not show significant 
results. 
Gender Outcomes 
The evaluation included questions on atti-tudes 
toward gender roles. Results show 
that respondents participating in the pro-gram 
for more than one year developed 
more gender-equitable attitudes. 
Limitations 
The final evaluation of the project was car-ried 
out four months after its completion. A 
long-term assessment may be more suc-cessful 
in capturing the full impact of the 
intervention, as girls reach important transi-tions 
in their lives, including marriage and 
childbearing, and become decisionmakers in 
their households. 
Conclusions 
The Ishraq program integrated various 
approaches to improve the health and well-being 
of adolescent girls in rural Upper 
Egypt. One key contribution of the interven-tion 
study is to show how addressing harm-ful 
gender norms, which often dictate how a 
girl is to behave and the opportunities avail-able 
to her, can lead to positive health and 
gender outcomes. The findings indicate that 
the project was successful in program areas 
and among program participants in obtain-ing 
space in which girls could safely meet, 
increasing literacy, increasing support 
among girls for later age at marriage and for 
a say in choosing their husbands, reducing 
support for FGM/C, and increasing feelings 
of self-confidence. Through participation in 
Ishraq activities, parents adopted increas-ingly 
progressive views related to girls’ 
roles, rights, and capabilities. 
References 
Ishraq: Safe Places for Out-of -School 
Adolescent Girls to Learn, Play and Grow. 
Empowering Rural Girls in Egypt (Westport, 
CT: Save the Children, 2004). 
M. Brady, R. Assaad, B. Ibrahim, A. Salem, 
R. Salem, and N. Zibani. Providing New 
Opportunities to Adolescent Girls in Socially 
Conservative Settings: The Ishraq Program 
in Rural Upper Egypt. Full Report (New 
York: Population Council, 2007). 
0 
Control 
villages 
(N=130) 
None 
(N=71) 
12 
months 
(N=110) 
13-29 
months* 
(N=50) 
Full 
participation* 
Mean Score 
Level of participation in Ishraq 
Baseline 
Endline 
Figure 6.1 
* Significant at p=0.001 
Source: Brady et al., 2007.
Youth Case Study 
Intervention: 
First-time Parents 
Country: India 
Type of Intervention: Counseling, support, and peer groups 
Implementing Organizations: Population Council in partnership with the Child in Need Institute of West Bengal and the 
Deepak Charitable Trust in Gujarat 
Gender-Related Barriers to RH 
Recently married adolescent girls in India 
face one of the most vulnerable periods of 
their lives, including increased restrictions 
on their mobility and decision-making capa-bilities 
and social isolation. They are often 
not empowered enough to make decisions 
for themselves that will lead to positive out-comes. 
These girls are also often under 
pressure to conceive soon after marriage, 
even though the risks of early childbearing 
are well known. While these young married 
girls are now sexually active, they are often 
unable to negotiate sex with their husbands. 
Objective 
This project aimed to develop and test an 
integrated package of health and social 
interventions to improve young married 
women's reproductive and sexual health 
knowledge and practices, and to expand 
their ability to act in their own interests. 
Strategy 
The intervention, carried out from January 
2003 – December 2004, focused on young 
women who were newly married, pregnant, 
or first-time postpartum in Diamond 
Harbour Block in West Bengal and Vadodara 
Block in Gujarat. Husbands of these young 
women, senior family members, and health 
care providers were also included. The inter-vention 
consisted of three components: 
information provision; healthcare service 
adjustments; and group formation. 
Female and male outreach workers 
provided RH information to 2,305 young 
married women and 1,481 of their husbands 
through home visits. Husbands were 
reached by male outreach workers and by 
participation in discussions in neighborhood 
meetings. Senior family members were 
reached in a more ad hoc manner when 
opportunities arose. 
Topics included prevention of repro-ductive 
tract infections; contraception; sex 
as a voluntary, safe, and pleasurable experi-ence; 
planning for delivery of the first birth; 
care during pregnancy and postpartum; 
breastfeeding; ways for husbands to sup-port 
wives during pregnancy, childbirth, and 
the postpartum period; and the importance 
of communication, respect, and joint deci-sionmaking 
between husband and wife. 
The project worked closely with health 
care providers to educate them on the spe-cial 
needs of young, newly married couples 
and first-time parents. The project supplied 
safe delivery kits and refresher-training 
courses for traditional birth attendants and 
provided transportation for couples to health 
services. 
The project also formed groups of 8-12 
young women who met for 2-3 hours each 
64 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
month. The meetings gave girls the oppor-tunity 
to interact with peers and mentors, 
exposing the young women to new ideas 
and increasing their self-confidence to com-municate 
and act in their own interests. The 
girls identified topics to focus on, including 
legal literacy, vocational skills, pregnancy 
and postpartum care, gender dynamics 
within and outside the family, relationship 
issues, and nutrition. 
Evaluation Design: 
Quasi-experimental study design 
Pre- and post-intervention surveys were 
administered to young women in both the 
intervention and control sites. In total, 2,862 
and 4,555 women were interviewed at base-line 
and endline, respectively. Data were col-lected 
on topics such as young women's 
agency and social networks, reproductive 
health knowledge and practices, and partner 
support and communication. 
Reproductive Health Outcomes 
The intervention had significant, positive 
effects on girls’ autonomy, RH knowledge 
and practice, and couple relationships. 
RH knowledge and practices improved 
significantly among program participants in 
both intervention sites. After controlling for 
potentially confounding effects, young 
women who were exposed to the interven-
Meeting the Needs of Youth 65 
tion in Diamond Harbour were significantly 
more likely to have had comprehensive 
antenatal check-ups. The intervention group 
saw a 62 percent increase in those who 
made delivery preparations, as opposed to 
only a 40 percent increase in the control 
group. In the experimental group, the pro-portion 
that had a postpartum check-up 
increased by 40 percent, while there was 
only minimal increase in the proportion 
seeking postpartum care among controls. 
Women exposed to the intervention were 
also significantly more likely to have breast-fed 
their babies immediately after birth and 
fed their babies colostrum when compared 
to the control. In Vadodara, participation 
had a significant, positive net effect on rou-tine 
postpartum check-ups and use of con-traceptives 
for delaying the first birth. 
In both sites, young women who par-ticipated 
in the intervention were more likely 
to have discussed contraceptive use and 
timing of first pregnancy with their hus-bands, 
although the net effect was statisti-cally 
significant only in Vadodara. 
Gender Outcomes 
The intervention had significant effects on 
partner communication. Young married 
women from both sites who participated in 
the intervention had significantly greater say 
in household decision-making than young 
married women in control villages. They 
were also more likely to discuss contracep-tive 
use and timing of first pregnancy with 
their husbands. Young women in Diamond 
Harbour were more likely than women in the 
control villages to express their opinion 
when they disagreed with their husbands. In 
some sites, young married women who 
were exposed to the intervention had more 
mobility and were more likely to adhere to 
more equitable gender norm attitudes. 
Limitations 
The study faced numerous limitations to its 
research design. First, there were a number 
of differences between the intervention and 
control villages (e.g. programmatic activities 
and socio-demographic characteristics of 
young married girls) that limit their compa-rability. 
Comparison of background charac-teristics 
also show that self-selection into 
intervention activities did occur. Additionally, 
many of the young women were lost at fol-low- 
up due to their frequent movement 
between natal and marital homes. 
Conclusions 
Young married girls face many gender barri-ers 
that limit their capacity to act in ways 
and make decisions that are in their own 
interest. The First-time Parents project 
sought to address these barriers by empow-ering 
women with knowledge, reducing their 
social isolation, and making healthcare ser-vices 
more youth-friendly. The intervention 
was successful in producing positive repro-ductive 
health and gender outcomes, includ-ing 
health practices and spousal 
communication. 
References 
K.G. Santhya and N. Haberland, 
Empowering Young Mothers in India: 
Results of the First-time Parents Project 
(New York: Population Council, 2007). 
K.G. Santhya, N. Haberland, A. Das et al., 
Empowering Married Young Women and 
Improving Their Sexual and Reproductive 
Health: Effects of the First-time Parents 
Project (New Delhi: Population Council, 
2008). 
Population Council, Meeting the Health and 
Social Needs of Married Girls in India: The 
First-time Parents’ Project’s Implementation 
and Reach (New Delhi: Population Council, 
2006).
In the past five years there has been a clear 
increase in the evidence that integrating gen-der 
does improve reproductive health out-comes. 
Many of these programs also improve 
gender outcomes. Thanks to early pioneers117 
whose efforts articulated the links between gen-der 
and development, donors have set gender 
equality and gender mainstreaming as core 
principles of their programming.118 Attention to 
gender issues in development assistance has 
been the policy of USAID since 1982.119 In 
2007, the UN adopted a system-wide policy for 
gender mainstreaming and that same year the 
World Health Assembly adopted Resolution 
WHO 60.25 for integrating gender analysis and 
actions at all levels of health policies and pro-grams 
in member states.120 
The Programme of Action of the 1994 
International Conference on Population and 
Development (ICPD) called for a gender per-spective 
to be “adopted in all processes of pol-icy 
formulation and implementation and in the 
delivery of services, especially in sexual and 
reproductive health, including family plan-ning.” 
121 Many of the strategies highlighted in 
the ICPD Programme of Action are clearly evi-dent 
in the programs described in this report. 
Today, women and men are reaping the ben-efits 
of gender-integrated programming and 
stronger evaluations are measuring the effects. 
This update of the 2004 “So What?” report 
makes an important contribution to the growing 
body of literature on gender-based approaches 
to policy and programming. The evidence pre-sented 
here suggests that incorporating gender 
strategies contributes to reducing unintended 
pregnancy, improving maternal health, reducing 
HIV/AIDS and other STIs, eliminating harmful 
practices, and meeting the needs of youth – all 
broadly included under the term “reproductive 
health.” As stated earlier, the interventions 
reviewed here were of two broad types: those 
that accommodate existing gender differences 
and inequities to achieve RH goals; and those 
that seek to transform gender norms and ame-liorate 
66 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
gender inequities to overcome RH barri-ers. 
Significantly, a majority of the interventions 
in this review employ transformative approaches 
and this must be counted as a big step forward. 
Indeed, substantial progress has been made 
and several of the recommendations made in 
2004 can now be listed as achievements, notably: 
1) Gender and Measures of Outcomes. There 
has been progress in the last five years and this 
review found several projects that do integrate 
gender perspectives and promote gender equal-ity. 
Moreover, gender equality and gender-equi-table 
outcomes are measured more often than 
they were five years ago. Many organizations 
are funding and implementing innovative gen-der- 
integrated programs, and some are also pri-oritizing 
strong evaluations of gender-integrated 
programs. For example, USAID has long sup-ported 
operations research projects, which has 
included evaluation of gender-integrated pro-gramming. 
Operations research, along with 
other program evaluations, has moved the field 
forward in terms of documenting and measur-ing 
what difference a gender perspective can 
make in improving RH as well as gender equity 
outcomes. The authors did find examples of 
additional programs that seemed innovative but 
were lacking in evaluation, thus the impact 
they may be generating is not known and they 
were not included in this review. 
2) Added Value. While it is still difficult to iso-late 
the effects of a gender-equitable project on 
RH/HIV/AIDS, several of the projects reviewed 
Conclusions 
117 See 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights; see also 
Overholt et al., 1985; Longwe, 1991; and Moser, 1993. 
118 Pfannanschmidt et al., 1996; UN, 2002; WHO, 2002; Sida, 
2005. 
119 USAID, 1982. 
120 See www.who.int/gender/mainstreaming/investing/en/ 
index3.html. 
121 UN, 1999. 
7
Conclusions 67 
were quite convincing in demonstrating the 
“added value” of a gender component. In these 
projects, control or comparison groups represent 
the basic RH services to which the gender com-ponent 
was added. One could argue that much 
of what was done in the intervention sites really 
addressed quality of care as much as gender, but 
the overlap between these two concepts at the 
operational level should not be seen as invalidat-ing 
the test of a gender-integrated intervention. 
Similarly, Chapter 5 (Harmful Practices) docu-ments 
reproductive health outcomes of inter-ventions 
that involved gender as their central 
theme—for example, interventions to stop 
FGM/C. Again, because of the use of control 
groups, the extent to which the adoption of a 
gender perspective in program design contrib-uted 
to positive gender outcomes is clear. A 
number of interventions across the chapters, 
and particularly those related to HIV/ AIDS and 
youth, focused on changing gender norms 
related to masculinity, behavior related to sex, 
and health-seeking. The strong evaluation 
designs used in most of these programs 
strengthen the conclusion that adopting a gen-der- 
transformative approach contributed to posi-tive 
RH and gender outcomes. 
3) Rigorous Evaluations. While there are many 
ethical, logistical, and financial reasons that not 
all evaluations can be randomized controlled tri-als 
(RCTs)—the gold standard of evaluations—the 
projects reported here demonstrate creativity and 
innovation in the use of other rigorous evaluation 
techniques. The development of approaches such 
as the use of participatory learning methods with 
youth or the efforts to involve men in maternity 
care should not be jettisoned just because of the 
difficulty of isolating the gender component in an 
evaluation. Qualitative evaluations should not be 
disregarded due to their inability to quantify 
change; their conclusions lend powerful insight to 
the processes of change. 
4) Beyond HIV/AIDS. While gender concerns 
have received more attention in HIV/AIDS/STI 
prevention work due to the well-documented 
link between inequitable gender relations and 
the spread of HIV/AIDS and STIs, the role of 
gender in the various other RH areas included 
in this report is increasingly demonstrated. 
Allowing for double-counting of interventions 
that address multiple RH areas, 18 of the pro-grams 
reviewed focus on improved outcomes 
related to harmful practices; 16 addressed HIV/ 
AIDS and other STIs; 13 addressed unintended 
pregnancy; 12 were directed at youth; and 7 
addressed maternal health. Most of the pro-grams 
related to youth also have objectives to 
improve HIV/AIDS/STI outcomes. Clearly, the 
importance of gender is being acknowledged 
across many facets of RH and health. 
One conclusion from the 2004 report 
remains true: “Achieving a change in gender 
relations is a long-term process that may not be 
reflected in a relatively short-term interven-tion.” 
122 The importance of long-term invest-ments 
in transforming inequitable gender 
norms that may compromise RH cannot be 
over-emphasized. Such long-term investments 
will facilitate dealing with the root causes of 
inequity rather than only the symptoms of it. 
Gender norms are learned and reinforced over 
many years; undoing those norms takes time. 
The need for evaluations to likewise measure 
impact over longer spans of time persists. 
New Findings 
Many projects related to each RH issue (unin-tended 
pregnancy, maternal health, etc.) sought 
to change underlying beliefs and attitudes that 
shape norms related to power dynamics between 
women and men, including sexual dynamics. 
These programs, working with men and women 
of all ages, have had success in improving gen-der- 
equitable views. Some programs have been 
successful in changing behavior, most commonly 
condom use, but also, in some cases, reducing 
gender-based violence. Addressing gender norms 
is time-intensive and requires examination of 
both male and female norms. 
All of the 40 programs reviewed here 
achieved positive reproductive health out-comes, 
though some were much more limited 
than the implementers had hoped for, often 
because the research designs were “contami-nated”. 
As in the 2004 review, there is always 
the possibility of reporting bias by participants, 
but given the increased rigor of many of the 
evaluations reviewed for the present report, the 
authors believe this bias has been reduced. 
As before, changes are more likely to be seen 
in knowledge and attitudes than in reproductive 122 Boender et al., 2004: 65.
health behaviors. Some of the most common RH 
outcomes measured include knowledge and use 
of contraceptives (11 interventions each), 
knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and pre-vention, 
condom use, and use of HIV/AIDS and 
pregnancy care services (see Table 1.3 on page 
10). Thirty of the 40 interventions reviewed for 
the present report measured gender impact; all 
of these reported positive changes on a range of 
gender outcomes. The most frequently mea-sured 
gender outcomes were attitudes regarding 
gender equity and women’s rights and partner 
communication about FP and other RH issues 
(nine and 11 evaluations, respectively; see Table 
1.4). Most of the other gender outcomes that 
were measured reflected various dimensions of 
women’s empowerment; for example, self-confi-dence 
or self-esteem, community participation 
and social networks, mobility, decision-making 
power, and practical skills. Three evaluations 
used empowerment scales to measure impact on 
gender outcomes. 
Based on this review, the key findings from 
this analysis of 40 projects with evaluation out-comes 
are that: 
n Gender-integrated strategies are stronger and 
better evaluated than five years ago. The 
analysis found that the strategies used to inte-grate 
gender were grounded in deeper theo-retical 
and practical knowledge of the effects 
of gender on RH. The most promising strate-gies 
for improving RH outcomes include those 
that seek to directly confront harmful or ineq-uitable 
gender norms (e.g. IMAGE, Program 
H, Stepping Stones), increase community 
awareness and dialogue around gender and 
RH (e.g. Soul City, Through our Eyes, Somos 
Diferentes Somos Iguales), or increase couple 
communication (e.g. First-time Parents 
Project). In the current analysis, the evalua-tion 
methodologies were much more likely to 
use experimental and quasi-experimental 
designs. No evaluation in 2004 used random-ized 
control trials; five evaluations herein 
used this “gold standard” methodology. 
Evaluating gender outcomes is necessary to 
understanding further the mechanisms and the 
degree to which intervention strategies affect 
behavior and attitudes. Continued evaluation 
rigor will further inform and enrich program 
development and, ultimately, RH outcomes. 
n Incorporating gender into a range of strate-gies 
68 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
leads to a better understanding of RH 
issues. Each chapter of this review focused 
on the gender strategies used to address the 
various RH issues. Looking at the programs 
in each chapter as a whole, it is clear that 
careful incorporation of gender into program 
strategies leads to a better understanding of 
the RH issue at hand. This is clear in HIV/ 
AIDS programming: inequitable gender rela-tions 
in the ability to negotiate safe sex and 
expectations of intimate relationships fuel 
transmission of HIV. Strategies to meet the 
needs of youth focus on establishing strong 
foundations for young women and men to 
grow into adulthood with good reproductive 
health, and understanding the gender roles 
that guide their behavior leads to more effec-tive 
programs. Programs for youth work to 
strengthen communication and negotiation 
skills. Programs for young women also pro-vide 
livelihood skills and establish communi-ty 
networks for this group, especially 
important because young women are often 
isolated. Examining harmful practices, one 
can see that they are clearly rooted in gen-der 
roles, and that any effort to mitigate 
these practices needs to encompass the 
social constructions of gender that have 
legitimated those practices over time. 
If any areas seem to be lagging behind, they 
would be the areas involving unintended 
pregnancy and maternal mortality. The unin-tended 
pregnancy interventions appeared to 
incorporate gender in less ambitious and 
accommodating ways compared to other RH 
areas. In addition, fewer interventions were 
found here than in the 2004 review of reduc-ing 
unintended pregnancy. Maternal health 
had the fewest number of evaluated interven-tions 
of any of the RH topics. Nonetheless, 
evidence exists that the healthy timing and 
spacing of pregnancy can be improved by 
incorporating gender in programs, with the 
result of healthier mothers and families. 
n Formative research is critical. As noted in 
many of the interventions reviewed, forma-tive 
research is critical for designing gender 
interventions. Programs to integrate gender 
benefit greatly from initial formative 
research to determine specific social and 
gender dynamics in project areas. This type
Conclusions 69 
of groundwork can help determine which 
groups should be included in specific inter-ventions. 
Formative research can also help 
ensure that the project is meeting local 
needs and that it is being implemented with 
an understanding of the local context. 
n Programs that integrate gender can benefit 
from working at multiple levels. The 40 
projects reviewed include work with indi-viduals, 
couples, families, community lead-ers, 
providers, and policymakers, among 
other groups. Many of the projects also link 
individual-level interventions with commu-nity- 
level interventions, such as mass media 
or social marketing campaigns. 
Gender-integrated components of reproduc-tive 
health programming are often embedded 
in participatory or community empowerment 
initiatives. This theme is common in many 
of the projects, including Through Our Eyes, 
Stepping Stones, Program H, AYA, and moth-ers2mothers. 
Some of these programs seek to 
empower both women and communities. The 
various programs have involved married 
women, men, youth, parents, and communi-ty 
leaders. Some programs worked not only 
with the health sector, but also in the areas 
of agriculture, education, and economic 
development. Because changing norms is a 
community process, projects will benefit 
from careful consideration of the multiple 
levels at which gender norms operate and 
inclusion of a community involvement or 
mobilization component. 
n Projects that integrate gender need to 
focus on costs, scale up, and identifying 
policy and systemic changes required to 
“mainstream” gender. Notably absent from 
many of the projects reviewed here is ade-quate 
attention to the costs of the projects 
and the feasibility of scaling up the inter-ventions. 
Given the time-intensive nature of 
some of the interventions, particularly for 
those that seek to examine and change per-sonal 
views about gender norms, consider-ations 
for scale up are critical. Moreover, 
few of the projects included discussion 
about national or sectoral policies that 
might exacerbate gender inequality or, con-versely, 
enhance gender equality. 
Future Directions 
This publication makes a critically important 
contribution to the continuing quest for con-clusive 
evidence that incorporating gender 
components to programs improves RH out-comes. 
While the reviewers might wish for 
more conclusive data and more in-depth 
descriptions of what makes a program gender 
transformative, there can be no doubt that the 
field has come a long way in the last five years. 
Many challenges remain, not the least of 
which is that more investment still needs to be 
made in monitoring and evaluation if we are to 
prove beyond a shadow of doubt that integrating 
gender yields improvements in RH outcomes. 
Donors should be encouraged to focus their fund-ing 
efforts on gender integration interventions 
and evaluations, and, in turn, to encourage imple-menting 
organizations to measure gender impact. 
Given the evidence presented here, we 
recommend that development experts focus 
particularly on: 
n Scaling up and replicating the programs that 
have been proven to work; 
n Focusing on transformative approaches in 
interventions, particularly in those that seek 
to reduce unintended pregnancy; 
n Undertaking cost-effectiveness research to 
shed light on how to achieve these improve-ments 
in RH in a manner that is affordable 
and feasible for both donors and governments; 
n Institutionalizing these achievements 
through policy change; and 
n Conducting sustainability analyses to learn 
how long these changes last, and what fol-low- 
up may be needed over time to ensure 
that the positive impacts of interventions to 
improve gender-equity are maintained and 
passed on to future generations. 
It is the fervent hope of the authors that 
more program planners, policymakers, and 
funders will insist on incorporating gender into 
RH programs. The way forward, focusing on 
well-evaluated projects that address policy, sys-tems, 
and cost issues, scaling up gender inte-gration, 
and addressing sustainability of 
equitable gender relations over time, will make 
important contributions to health and lives of 
women, men, and families.
Appendix: Quick Reference Guide 
The following tables summarize the objectives, strategies, 
reproductive health outcomes, and gender outcomes of the 
interventions included in this report. The tables, like this 
report, are organized by RH issue area (unintended pregnancy, 
maternal health, STIs/HIV/AIDS, harmful practices, and youth). 
Table A.2 identifies interventions by evaluation methodologies. 
70 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Appendix: Table A.1 71 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
Reducing Unintended Pregnancy 
Cultivating Men's 
Interest in FP 
Male Motivation 
Campaign 
PRACHAR I  II 
PROCOSI 
Reproductive Health 
Awareness 
Project Concern 
International, Institute 
for Reproductive 
Health (Georgetown 
University) 
Johns Hopkins 
Bloomberg School of 
Public Health CCP, 
Guinean Ministry of 
Health 
Pathfinder 
International, local 
NGOs 
PROCOSI, Population 
Council 
KAANIB Foundation 
Increase men's 
involvement in FP 
decision-making and 
practice 
Increase access and 
demand for health 
care services; improve 
quality of care; 
improve coordination 
among health care 
providers and services 
Improve the health 
and welfare of young 
mothers and their 
children by changing 
traditional customs of 
early childbearing 
Assess the impact and 
cost of incorporating a 
gender perspective in 
reproductive health 
service delivery 
Improve men's 
involvement in RH 
matters 
Integration of FP mes-sages 
into water and 
sanitation program 
Community outreach 
to religious leaders; 
social mobilization 
through advocacy and 
multimedia interven-tions 
Nonformal education; 
parent and community 
involvement; provision 
of contraceptives 
Institutionalize a gen-der 
perspective in RH 
service delivery 
Education sessions on 
RH and partner com-munication 
Greater contraceptive 
knowledge by women 
and men; greater fer-tility 
knowledge by 
women and men 
Greater contraceptive 
knowledge; greater 
family planning use 
Lengthened first birth 
interval; improved 
knowledge, attitudes 
toward, and use of 
contraception; 
increased knowledge 
of risks of early child-bearing; 
fewer teenage 
pregnancies 
Increased client satis-faction 
with providers 
and care; decline in 
unmet need for con-traceptives 
Greater knowledge 
of women's fertile 
period; increased 
knowledge and 
practice of self breast 
and testicular exams; 
greater contraceptive 
knowledge 
Greater partner com-munication 
regarding 
family planning and 
communication 
Increased partner 
communication about 
family planning 
None 
Increased partner 
communication about 
FP and sexual rela-tions 
Great partner 
communication 
around family 
planning 
El Salvador 
Guinea 
India 
Bolivia 
Philippines 
14 
13 
16 
20 
15 
Program Quick-Reference Guide
72 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
REWARD 
Together for a Happy 
Family 
Women's 
Empowerment Model 
to Train Midwives 
and Doctors 
FEMME Project 
Nepal Red Cross 
Society, Centre for 
Research on 
Environment, Health 
and Population 
Activities, CEDPA 
Jordanian National 
Population Committee, 
Johns Hopkins 
Bloomberg School of 
Public Health CCP 
Family Health Alliance 
CARE Peru, Peruvian 
Ministry of Health 
Strengthen women's 
capabilities for 
informed decision-making 
to prevent 
unintended pregnancy 
and improve repro-ductive 
health 
Enlist men's support 
in making informed 
decisions with their 
wives toward using 
family planning 
Address maternal 
mortality in 
Afghanistan by 
preventing unwanted 
pregnancies and 
promoting birth 
spacing through the 
expansion of family 
planning services 
Improve access, 
use, and quality of 
emergency obstetric 
care (EMOC) for 
pregnant women 
Expand access to and 
delivery of quality, 
gender-sensitive FP 
and health informa-tion; 
promote an 
enabling environment 
that strengthens wom-en's 
informed RH 
decision-making 
National multimedia 
campaign to involve 
men in family 
planning 
Empowerment 
strategies and training 
of female health 
providers 
Multi-component 
strategy to standardize 
handling of cases and 
encourage women's 
right-based approach 
to obstetric care 
through organization 
changes 
Increased contracep-tive 
prevalence rate; 
increased registration 
for ANC 
Greater contraceptive 
use by men; greater 
contraceptive knowl-edge 
Greater provider 
knowledge of family 
planning and STI 
detection and trans-mission; 
improved 
clinical skills 
Increase in meeting 
women's EMOC 
needs; reduced 
case-fatality rate 
None 
Increased spousal 
communication about 
FP reported by men 
None 
None 
Nepal 
Jordan 
Afghanistan 
Peru 
17 
14 
18 
23 
Program Quick-Reference Guide 
Improving Maternal Health
Appendix: Table A.1 73 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
Involving Men in 
Maternity Care 
(South Africa) 
Men in Maternity 
(India) 
Social Mobilization or 
Government Services 
Integration of RH 
Services for Men in 
Health and Family 
Welfare Centers 
Involving Men 
in Sexual and 
Reproductive 
Health 
Reproductive Health 
Research Unit (RHRU) 
University of the 
Witwatersrand, 
KwaZulu Natal 
Department of Health, 
Population Council 
Employee's 
State Insurance 
Corporation, 
Population 
Council 
Foundation for 
Research in Health 
Systems, ICRW 
NIPORT and 
Directorate of Family 
Planning, FRONTIERS/ 
Population Council 
Association for the 
Benefit of the 
Ecuadorian Family 
(APROFE) 
Expand antenatal and 
post-partum care pro-gram 
to improve RH; 
increase the use of 
appropriate post-par-tum 
family planning 
Investigate the feasi-bility, 
acceptability 
and cost of a model of 
maternity care that 
encourages husbands’ 
participation in 
antenatal and 
postpartum care 
Examine the effective-ness 
and cost of 
addressing 'supply' 
versus 'demand' con-straints 
to improve RH 
for young married 
women 
Integrate male repro-ductive 
health services 
within the existing 
government female-focused 
health care 
delivery system 
Increase the number 
of male clients seek-ing 
and receiving RH/ 
STI services 
Clinic-based: strength-en 
existing antenatal 
package and service 
monitoring; train 
health providers 
Individual/couple/ 
group counseling, STI 
screening, and syn-dromic 
management 
Social mobilization 
through community-based 
organizations; 
strengthening govern-ment 
services through 
training for service 
providers 
Community outreach 
and mobilization; 
training for service 
providers 
Encourage female users 
to involve male part-ners; 
radio campaigns; 
adjust clinic hours to 
men’s schedules 
Greater knowledge of 
dual protection pro-vided 
by condoms; 
increased assistance 
by men during an 
emergency situation 
Greater contraceptive 
knowledge for women 
and men; greater FP 
use; greater knowl-edge 
of warnings 
signs in pregnancy; 
increase in screening 
of pregnant women 
for syphilis 
Greater knowledge 
of maternal health, 
contraceptive side 
effects, and abortion; 
increased use of 
services 
Increased clinic visits 
by men; increased 
clinic visits by women 
Increased clinic visits 
by men 
Increased partner 
communication on 
STIs, sexual relations, 
immunization, and 
breastfeeding 
Greater inter-spousal 
communication 
on baby's health; 
increased joint 
decisionmaking on 
family health and FP 
Improved community 
support for young 
women's health needs 
None 
None 
South Africa 
India 
India 
Bangladesh 
Ecuador 
25 
24 
27 
36 
37 
Program Quick-Reference Guide 
Reducing HIV/AIDS and other STIs
7744 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
Men as Partners 
mothers2 mothers 
Play Safe 
Program H 
Somos Diferentes, 
Somos Iguales 
Stepping Stones 
EngenderHealth 
mothers2mothers 
Reproductive Health 
Initiative for Youth in 
Asia (EU/UNFPA) 
Instituto Promundo 
Puntos de Encuentro 
Medical Research 
Council 
Increase information 
and services to 
improve men’s RH; 
promote male engage-ment 
to challenge 
gender norms 
Provide education and 
psychosocial support 
to HIV-positive preg-nant 
women and new 
mothers; help them to 
access health care 
services for PMTCT 
and postpartum care 
Promote healthy 
behaviors about sex, 
drug use, and gender 
relations among mid-dle- 
class male youth 
Improve young men’s 
attitudes toward gen-der 
norms; reduce 
HIV/STI risk 
Empower young men 
and women to prevent 
HIV infection in 
Nicaragua 
Improve sexual health 
by building stronger, 
more gender-equitable 
relationships with bet-ter 
communication 
between partners 
Multiple macro- and 
micro-level strategies 
including workshops, 
media, and advocacy 
Peer education and 
mentoring 
Peer education and out-reach 
(pilot project) 
A validated curriculum 
for group education; 
lifestyle social market-ing 
campaign 
Mass media: Sexto 
Sentido television series 
Participatory learning 
approaches in single-sex 
peer groups 
Improvement in 
knowledge about RH; 
improved attitudes 
toward IPV and deci-sion- 
making 
Increased exclusive 
breastfeeding; greater 
knowledge of MTCT 
transmission; greater 
receipt and ingestion 
of nevirapine; greater 
CD4 testing; greater 
contraception use 
Greater knowledge of 
HIV/AIDS; reduction in 
frequency of commer-cial 
sex; greater con-dom 
use; greater use 
of reproductive health 
services 
Increased understand-ing 
of association 
between gender and 
HIV/AIDS; reduced 
STI symptoms 
Greater knowledge 
and use of RH servic-es; 
greater knowledge 
of HIV/AIDS transmis-sion 
and prevention; 
greater condom use 
with partners 
Lower STI symptoms; 
greater condom use in 
last 12 months; fewer 
partners; lower per-petuation 
of IPV/SV 
Increased gender-equitable 
attitudes 
regarding women's 
rights 
Greater psychosocial 
well-being 
None 
Increased support of 
gender-equitable 
norms; support for 
gender-equity in GEM 
Scale 
Reduced stigmatizing 
and gender-inequitable 
attitudes; higher gen-der 
index values; 
increased self-efficacy 
Improved partner 
communication; 
changes in attitudes 
regarding acceptability 
of IPV/SV 
South Africa 
South Africa 
Cambodia 
Brazil 
Nicaragua 
South Africa 
33 
36 
34 
42 
32 
40 
Program Quick-Reference Guide
Appendix: Table A.1 75 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
Tuelimishane 
Yaari Dosti 
Behane Hewan 
Building Life Skills to 
Improve Adolescent 
Girls’ RSH 
Delaying Age at 
Marriage in Rural 
Maharashtra 
Tuelimishane Project 
Instituto Promundo, 
CORO, Horizons/ 
Population Council 
Ethiopian Ministry of 
Youth and 
Sport, Amhara 
Regional Youth 
Bureau, UNFPA, 
Population Council 
Swaasthya, ICRW 
Institute of Health 
Management Pachod, 
ICRW 
Reduce HIV risk 
behaviors and vio-lence 
by young men 
through gender-focused, 
community-based 
interventions, 
including drama and 
peer support 
Examine the effective-ness 
of interventions 
designed to improve 
young men’s attitudes 
toward gender norms 
and to reduce HIV/STI 
risk 
Sensitize communities 
to the risks and disad-vantages 
of child mar-riage; 
promote 
education to prevent 
early marriage 
Improve the social 
and health status of 
adolescent girls; pro-mote 
self-develop-ment 
and increase 
self-confidence and 
self-esteem; delay age 
at marriage 
Increase girls’ self-esteem 
and literacy; 
delay age at marriage 
Community theater and 
peer support groups to 
promote dialog on gen-der 
and HIV 
A validated curriculum 
and lifestyle social mar-keting 
campaign (an 
adaptation of Program 
H) 
Harmful Practices 
Social mobilization 
of adolescent girls; 
nonformal education 
and livelihood programs 
for out-of-school girls; 
community dialogue on 
early marriage; fiscal 
incentives to families 
A one-year life skills 
training course; infor-mation, 
education, and 
communication cam-paign 
A one-year life skills 
training course; parent 
and community 
involvement 
Positive shift in atti-tudes 
toward violence 
against women; 
decreased HIV risk 
behaviors; increased 
use of condoms at 
last sex with primary 
partner 
Increased understand-ing 
of association 
between gender 
norms and HIV/AIDS; 
increased condom use 
with all partners; 
reduction in self-reported 
IPV 
Increased knowledge 
and communication 
on HIV, STIs, and FP; 
reduced likelihood that 
younger adolescents 
were married; 
increased contracep-tive 
use 
Greater S/RH knowl-edge; 
improved 
menstrual hygiene 
Increased age at 
marriage; improved 
S/RH knowledge 
Positive changes in 
attitudes toward 
norms regarding gen-der 
roles and IPV 
Increased support of 
gender-equitable 
norms; improvements 
in partner communi-cation 
Increased school 
attendance for girls 
Improved perceived 
self-determination 
Improved cognitive 
and practical skills; 
increased willingness 
to act autonomously 
Tanzania 
India 
Ethiopia 
India 
India 
38 
33 
45 
45 
52 
Program Quick-Reference Guide 
early marriage and childbearing
76 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
Awash FGM/C 
Elimination Project 
Five Dimensional 
Approach for the 
Eradication of FGM/C 
Navrongo FGM/C 
Experiment 
Tostan Community-based 
Education 
Program 
IMAGE 
CARE Ethiopia, local 
NGOs, Population 
Council 
IntraHealth 
International 
Navrongo Health 
Research Center 
Tostan, GTZ, 
Population Council 
Small Enterprise 
Foundation 
Empower women for 
greater participation 
in community and to 
discuss FGM/C with 
partners 
Increase knowledge 
about FGM/C and 
change behavior 
Accelerate abandon-ment 
of FGM/C in 
the Kassena-Nanka 
district of Northern 
Ghana 
Provide information to 
support a strategy to 
improve women's 
health and abandon-ment 
of FGC 
Increase women’s 
empowerment 
through micro-lending, 
gender 
awareness, and HIV 
training 
BCC and educational 
activities to break the 
silence surrounding 
FGM/C; meetings with 
community groups; 
performances 
Improve women's 
empowerment and initi-ate 
community dialog 
through the perspec-tives 
of health, gender, 
law/rights, religion, and 
information 
Community involve-ment, 
FGM/C education, 
livelihood and develop-ment 
activities for 
young girls 
Basic education pro-gram 
including hygiene, 
problem solving, wom-en's 
health, and human 
rights 
Micro-finance through 
women’s groups and 
gender-focused training 
Increased knowledge 
regarding conse-quences 
of FGM/C; 
greater contraceptive 
knowledge; greater 
family planning use 
Change in attitudes 
regarding FGM/C; 
increased community 
action against FGM/C 
Decreased FGM/C 
incidence 
Improved knowledge 
of contraception, STIs, 
prenatal care, and 
violence; decreased 
incidence of violence; 
greater awareness of 
FGC consequences; 
decreased FGC 
incidence 
Decreased IPV/SV; 
more progressive 
attitudes toward IPV/ 
SV; decreased control-ling 
behavior by 
intimate partner 
Spousal communica-tion 
regarding family 
planning; increased 
public discussion of 
FGM/C 
Teachers, media, and 
religious leaders made 
public declarations 
against FGM/C 
None 
Improved attitudes 
toward girls' school-ing; 
improved atti-tudes 
toward role of 
women's unions to 
demand rights 
Increased score on 
women's empower-ment 
scale; increased 
progressive attitudes 
toward gender norms 
Ethiopia, Kenya, 
Sudan 
Ethiopia 
Ghana 
Senegal 
South Africa 
47 
48 
46 
54 
56 
Program Quick-Reference Guide 
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting 
Gender-based Violence
Appendix: Table A.1 77 
Table A.1 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
One Man Can 
Campaign 
Soul City 
Through Our Eyes 
African Youth 
Alliance Program 
First-time Parents 
Project 
Sonke Gender Justice 
Soul City Institute for 
Health  Development 
Communication, 
National Network on 
Violence Against 
Women 
American Refugee 
Committee, 
Communication 
for Change 
UNFPA, PATH, 
Pathfinder 
International 
Child in Need Institute, 
Deepak Charitable 
Trust, Population 
Council 
Male involvement to 
take action against 
domestic and sexual 
violence 
Address gender 
norms at the commu-nity 
and individual 
levels through 
‘edutainment’ 
Provide participants 
with a safe environ-ment 
to share experi-ences, 
develop new 
ideas, and address 
gender-based violence 
in their communities 
Improve adolescent 
sexual and reproductive 
health and to prevent 
transmission of HIV/ 
AIDS 
Develop an integrated 
package of health and 
social interventions to 
improve married young 
women's S/RH knowl-edge/ 
practices, and 
self-determination 
BCC campaign and 
Action Kit to promote 
the idea that all men 
have a role to play in 
ending violence against 
women 
Multi-media health pro-motion 
campaign using 
TV and radio broadcasts 
incorporating social 
issues into entertain-ment 
formats 
Participatory communi-ty 
engagement with 
video and community 
playback sessions 
Implementation 
and scaling up a 
comprehensive set 
of integrated ASRH 
interventions using 
existing institutions 
Educational home vis-its; 
counseling ses-sions; 
girls' group 
formation; training for 
health care providers 
Greater knowledge of 
HIV/AIDS transmis-sion 
and prevention; 
decrease in men's 
beliefs that violence 
against women is jus-tified 
in some circum-stances 
Increased knowledge 
of IPV/SV resources; 
decreased beliefs that 
men are justified in 
beating their partners; 
increased number of 
respondents taking 
action to stop IPV/SV 
Increased uptake of 
reproductive health 
services; increased 
capacity to make 
healthy decisions to 
mitigate consequences 
of risky sexual behavior 
Increased HIV/AIDS 
knowledge; increased 
confidence in 
negotiating condom 
use; increased delay 
of sexual debut; 
increased contracep-tive 
use 
Increased clinic visits 
for maternal health; 
greater family plan-ning 
use; improved 
partner communica-tion 
More gender-equitable 
beliefs in 
sex decision-making 
Women's increased 
awareness of self-worth 
and identity 
Improved gender 
relations; women 
more articulate in 
discussing IPV/SV 
and RH 
None 
Increased mobility, 
social networks devel-oped; 
increased part-ner 
support and 
communication 
South Africa 
South Africa 
Liberia 
Ghana, Tanzania, 
Uganda 
India 
50 
49 
50 
59 
64 
Program Quick-Reference Guide 
Meeting the Needs of Youth
78 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 
Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number 
Guria Adolescent 
Health Project 
Ishraq 
New Visions 
Transitions to 
Adulthood - 
Livelihoods Training 
Transitions to 
Adulthood - Tap  
Reposition Youth 
CARE International 
Caritas, Save the 
Children, Population 
Council, CEDPA 
CEDPA, local NGOs 
CARE India, 
Population Council 
K-Rep Development 
Agency, Population 
Council 
Achieve improvements 
in reproductive health 
through improving life 
skills of adolescents; 
provide youth-friendly 
information and ser-vices; 
raise communi-ty 
awareness 
Improve the life 
opportunities of rural 
out-of-school girls by 
improving literacy and 
education, livelihoods, 
health knowledge, and 
social policies 
Develop life skills 
and increase gender 
sensitivity and RH 
knowledge among 
boys and young men 
in order to improve 
outcomes for girls and 
women 
Deliver technical skills 
and transform the way 
girls view themselves 
Improve livelihood 
options; reduce 
unplanned pregnan-cies; 
decrease vulner-ability 
to STIs, HIV, 
and unsafe abortion 
Health education and 
social marketing; the-ater; 
micro-grants; 
youth-friendly services 
Nonformal educational 
sessions; female cham-pions; 
sports and physi-cal 
activity; home skills/ 
livelihoods training 
A series of 64 nonfor-mal 
educational ses-sions 
facilitated by peer 
leaders 
Group education; 
vocational training; 
financial counseling; 
peer mentors 
Financial empowerment 
through microcredit, 
combined with a focus 
on gender attitudes 
Greater contraceptive 
knowledge; greater 
family planning use 
Decline in acceptance 
of early marriage; 
decline in girls' favor-able 
attitudes toward 
FGM/C; improved atti-tudes 
toward violence 
Increased positive 
responses about IPV/ 
SV and FGC; greater 
knowledge of family 
planning sources; 
greater knowledge of 
HIV/AIDS transmis-sion 
Greater RH knowledge 
Greater ability to 
negotiate condom use 
with partner; greater 
ability to refuse sex 
Decreased tolerance 
for kidnapping 
Increased levels 
of self-confidence; 
improved gender 
attitudes 
Increased gender-equitable 
beliefs about 
gender roles and equi-table 
treatment 
Greater social skills; 
increased group 
membership 
Increased liberal 
gender attitudes; 
increased income and 
household assets 
Georgia 
Egypt 
Egypt 
India 
Kenya 
59 
62 
61 
60 
60 
Program Quick-Reference Guide 
Table A.1
Appendix: Table A.2 79 
Table A.2 
Evaluation Methodologies, by Category and Program Name 
Type of evaluation methodology # Main (and sub categories) Program name (and country) 
Experimental Design (Randomized control 5 HP/IPV/SV (UP, HIV/AIDS/STI) IMAGE (South Africa) 
trial, 2x2 or 4 cell) MH (Youth) Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) 
HP/FGM/C (Youth) Navrongo FGM/C Experiment (Ghana) 
MH (UP, Youth) Social Mobilization or Government Services (India) 
HIV/AIDS/STI Stepping Stones (South Africa) 
Quasi –Experimental Designs, Including: 17 HP/FGM/C (Youth) Awash FGM/C (Ethiopia, Sudan, Kenya) 
• Pretest-posttest, cluster sample HP/EM (Youth) Behane Hewan (Ethiopia) 
• Pretest-posttest, control group design UP (MH) Cultivating Men’s Interest in FP (El Salvador) 
• Non-equivalent control group HP/EM (Youth) Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra (India) 
• Quasi-experimental control group MH FEMME Project (Peru) 
• Case-control group Youth (UP, MH) First Time Parents (India) 
HIV/AIDS/STI (MH) Integration of RH Services for Men in Health and Family 
Welfare Centers (Bangladesh) 
Youth (HP/EM) Ishraq (Egypt) 
MH (UP) Men in Maternity (India) 
HIV/AIDS/STI (MH) mothers2mothers (South Africa) 
UP (HP/EM, MH) PRACHAR I  II (India) 
HIV/AIDS/STI Program H (Brazil) 
HIV/AIDS/STI Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales (Nicaragua) 
HP/FGM/C (UP, MH) Tostan Community Empowerment Program 
(Senegal, Burkina Faso) 
Youth (UP, HIV/AIDS/STI) Transition to Adulthood – Tap and Reposition Youth (Kenya) 
HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV) Tuelimishane (Tanzania) 
UP (MH) Reproductive Health Awareness (Philippines) 
Non-Experimental Study Design 15 Youth (HIV/AIDS/STI) Africa Youth Alliance (Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda) 
HP/EM (Youth) Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ Reproductive 
and Sexual Health (India) 
Youth (UP) Guria Adolescent Health Project (Georgia) 
HIV/AIDS/STI Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ecuador) 
UP Male Motivation Campaign (Guinea) 
HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV) Men as Partners (South Africa) 
Youth (HIV/AIDS/STI, HP/GBV) New Visions (Egypt) 
HP/GBV (HIV/AIDS/STI) One Man Can Campaign (South Africa) 
UP PROCOSI (Bolivia) 
UP (MH) REWARD (Nepal) 
HP/GBV Soul City (South Africa) 
UP Together for a Happy Family (Jordan) 
Youth Transitions to Adulthood – Livelihoods Training (India) 
UP (MH) Women’s Empowerment Model to Train for Midwives and 
Doctors (Afghanistan) 
HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV) Yaari Dosti (India) 
Qualitative 3 HP/FGM/C Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C 
(Ethiopia) 
HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV, Youth) Play Safe (Cambodia) 
HP/GBV Through Our Eyes (Liberia)
Table A.3 
Selected Reproductive Health Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report 
Outcomes Related To: Page Number 
Healthy Timing, Spacing, and Limiting of Pregnancies 
Greater contraceptive knowledge 
Awash FGM/C 47 
Behane Hewan 45 
Tostan Community Empowerment Program 54 
Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 14 
Guria Adolescent Health Project 59 
Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) 25 
Male Motivation Campaign 13 
Men in Maternity (India) 24 
Reproductive Health Awareness 15 
Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 
Together for a Happy Family 14 
Greater contraceptive use 
African Youth Alliance Program 59 
Awash FGM/C 47 
Behane Hewan 45 
First-time Parents Project 64 
Guria Adolescent Project 59 
Male Motivation Campaign 13 
Men in Maternity (India) 24 
mothers2mothers 36 
PRACHAR I  II 16 
REWARD 17 
Together for a Happy Family 14 
Greater awareness of fertility 
Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 14 
Reproductive Health Awareness 15 
Maternal Mortality and Safe Motherhood 
Increase in use of skilled pregnancy care 
First-time Parents Project 64 
REWARD 17 
Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 
Increase in joint decision-making with partner about contraception 
Men as Partners 33 
Men in Maternity (India) 24 
Reduced case fatality rate 
FEMME Project 23 
Increase in client satisfaction with providers and care 
PROCOSI 20 
Decline in unmet need for contraceptives 
PROCOSI 20 
Increase in screening of pregnant women for Syphilis 
Men in Maternity (India) 24 
Increase in women’s emergency obstetric care needs being met 
FEMME Project 23 
Greater knowledge of warnings signs in pregnancy 
Men in Maternity (India) 24 
Improved provider clinical skills  knowledge of FP methods  STI care 
Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors 18 
Increase in awareness of prenatal care 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 
80 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Appendix: Table A.3 81 
Table A.3 
Selected Reproductive Health Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report 
Outcomes Related To: Page Number 
HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 
Greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and prevention 
African Youth Alliance Program 59 
Behane Hewan 45 
Men as Partners 33 
New Visions 61 
One Man Can 50 
Play Safe 34 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 
Greater condom use: 
At last sex: 
Program H 42 
Tuelimishane 38 
Yaari Dosti 33 
With primary partner: 
Play Safe 34 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 
Stepping Stones 40 
Yaari Dosti 33 
Increase in visits to centers that provide HIV/AIDS and STI services 
Integration of RH Services for Men in Health and Family Welfare Centers 36 
Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health 37 
Play Safe 34 
Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 
Lower reported STI symptoms 
Program H 42 
Stepping Stones 40 
Greater knowledge of STI symptoms 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 
Increased exclusive breastfeeding 
mothers2mothers 36 
Greater receipt  ingestion of Nevirapine 
mothers2mothers 36 
Greater CD4 testing 
mothers2mothers 36 
Harmful Practices (early marriage, intimate partner violence,  female genital mutilation/cutting) 
Decrease in belief that IPV/SV is justified under some circumstances 
One Man Can Campaign 50 
Soul City 49 
Stepping Stones 40 
Greater knowledge of IPV/SV resources 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 
Soul City 49 
Decrease in incidence of violence 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 
Stepping Stones 40 
Yaari Dosti 33 
Increased community action and protest against harmful practices 
Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C 48 
Soul City 49
Table A.3 
Selected Reproductive Health Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report 
Outcomes Related To: Page Number 
Attitudes toward IPV/SV 
IMAGE 56 
Men as Partners 33 
New Visions 61 
Tuelimishane 38 
Decrease in risk of IPV/SV 
IMAGE 56 
Decrease in controlling behavior by intimate partner 
IMAGE 56 
Increased uptake of RH services 
Through Our Eyes 50 
Greater knowledge of harmful consequences of FGM/C and advantages of not cutting girls 
Awash FGM/C 47 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 
Ishraq 62 
Attitudes toward FGM/C 
Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C in Ethiopia 48 
New Visions 61 
Increase in number of men who marry uncircumcised girls 
Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C in Ethiopia 48 
Decrease in FGM/C incidence 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 
Navrongo FGM/C Experiment 46 
Increase in age at marriage 
Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 52 
Increase in interval between marriage and first birth 
PRACHAR I  II 16 
Greater knowledge of risks of early childbearing 
PRACHAR I  II 16 
Fewer adolescent pregnancies 
PRACHAR I  II 16 
Fewer adolescent marriages 
Behane Hewan 45 
Youth Reproductive Health 
Greater sexual and reproductive health knowledge 
Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ RSH 45 
Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 52 
Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training 60 
Increase in decision-making ability related to: 
Condom use: 
African Youth Alliance Program 59 
Transitions to Adulthood - Tap and Reposition Youth 60 
Sex: 
Transitions to Adulthood - Tap and Reposition Youth 60 
Increase in age at sexual debut 
African Youth Alliance Program 59 
82 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Appendix: Table A.4 83 
Table A.4 
Selected Gender Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report 
Outcomes Related To: Page Number 
Increased gender-equitable attitudes and beliefs 
IMAGE 56 
Men as Partners 33 
New Visions 61 
One Man Can Campaign 50 
Program H 42 
Tap and Reposition Youth 60 
Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 
Tuelimishane 38 
Yaari Dosti 33 
Increased partner communication about reproductive health or family planning 
Awash FGM/C 47 
Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 14 
First-time Parents Project 64 
Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) 25 
Men in Maternity (India) 24 
Male Motivation Campaign 13 
PROCOSI 20 
Reproductive Health Awareness 15 
Stepping Stones 40 
Together for a Happy Family 14 
Yaari Dosti 33 
Women's increased self-confidence, self-esteem, or self-determination 
Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ RSH 45 
Ishraq 62 
mothers2mothers 36 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 
Soul City 49 
Women's increased participation in the community and development of social networks 
Behane Hewan 45 
First-time Parents Project 64 
Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training 60 
Increased support (emotional, instrumental, family planning, or general support) from partners or community 
First-time Parents Project 64 
Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 
Higher scores on an empowerment scale for women 
IMAGE 56 
Ishraq 62 
Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 
Increased life and social skills 
Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 52 
Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training 60 
Women's increased decision-making power 
Through Our Eyes 50 
Higher formal educational participation for women or girls 
Behane Hewan 45 
Women's increased mobility 
First-time Parents Project 64 
Improved gender relations within the community 
Through Our Eyes 50 
Women more articulate in discussing IPV/SV and RH 
Through Our Eyes 50 
Decreased tolerance for kidnapping of girls 
Guria Adolescent Health Project 59
References 
General 
Barker, Gary and Christine Ricardo. Young Men and 
the Construction of Masculinity in Sub-Saharan 
Africa: Implications for HIV/AIDS, Conflict, and 
Violence. Social Development Papers: Conflict 
Prevention  Reconstruction. Washington, DC: 
World Bank, 2005. 
Barker, G., C. Ricardo, and M. Mascimento. 
Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-based 
Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme 
Interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization, 
2007. 
Centre for Development and Population Activities 
(CEDPA). ENABLE’s Contributions to the 
Reproductive Health Field. Washington, DC: CEDPA, 
2003. 
Clark, A., S. Hutchinson, and E. Weiss. Young Men 
and HIV Prevention. Washington, DC: Population 
Council/HORIZONS, 2004. 
Cohen, Sylvie I. and Michele Burger. “It Takes 2: 
Partnering With Men in Reproductive and Sexual 
Health.” UNFPA Programme Advisory Note. New 
York: UNFPA, 2003. 
Coll-Black, S., A. Bhushan, K. Fritsch, and J. 
Balabagno. Integrating Poverty and Gender into 
Health Programmes: A Report on Surveys of Health 
Ministries and Educational Institutions. Geneva: 
World Health Organization, 2005. 
Dahlberg, Linda L. and Alexander Butchart . “State 
of the Science: Violence Prevention Efforts in 
Developing and Developed Countries.” International 
Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 12, 
no.2 (2005): 93-104. 
Human Rights Watch. Hidden in the Mealie Meal: 
Gender-Based Issues and Women’s HIV Treatment 
in Zambia. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2007. 
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). 
How Gender Sensitive Are Your HIV and Family 
Planning Services? New York: IPPF, 2002. 
International Center for Research on Women 
(ICRW). Engaging Men and Boys to Achieve Gender 
Equality: How Can We Build on What We Have 
Learned? Washington, DC: ICRW, 2007. 
ICRW. Program Scan Matrix on Child Marriage. 
Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. 
ICRW. “Reducing Women’s and Girls’ Vulnerability 
to HIV/AIDS by Strengthening their Property and 
Inheritance Rights.” Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. 
ICRW. “When Marriage Is No Haven…Child Marriage 
in Developing Countries: What Works To Keep Girls 
Safe.” Washington, DC: ICRW, 2004. 
Longwe, S.H. “Gender Awareness: The Missing 
Element in the Third World Development Project.” 
In T. Wallace and C.March, eds. Changing 
Perceptions: Writings on Gender and Development. 
Oxford, England: Oxfam, 1991. 
Moser, C. Gender Planning and Development: 
Theory, Practice and Training. London: Routledge, 
1993. 
Murphy, Elaine and Dara Carr. Powerful Partners: 
Adolescent Girls  Education and Delayed 
Childbearing. Washington, DC: Population Reference 
Bureau, 2007. 
Overholt, C.A., K. Cloud, M.B. Anderson, and J.E. 
Austin. “Women in Development: A Framework for 
Project Analysis.” In C.A. Overholt, M.B. Anderson, 
K. Cloud, and J.E. Austin, eds. Gender Roles in 
Development Projects. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian 
Press, 1985. 
Pallitto, Christina C. and Patricia O’Campo. “The 
Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence and 
Unintended Pregnancy: Analysis of a National 
Sample From Columbia.” International Family 
Planning Perspectives 30, no. 4 (2004): 165-173. 
Pfannenschmidt, S., A. McKay, and E. McNeill. 
Through a Gender Lens: Resources for Population, 
Health and Nutrition Projects. Research Triangle 
Park, NC: Family Health International, 1996. 
84 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
References 85 
Ravindran, T. K. Sundari, A. Bhushan, and K. 
Fritsch. Integrating Poverty and Gender Into Health 
Programmes: A Sourcebook for Health 
Professionals. Geneva: World Health Organization, 
2005. 
Swedish International Development Cooperation 
Agency (Sida), Department for Democracy and 
Social Development, Gender Equality Team. Policy 
Promoting Gender Equality in Development 
Cooperation. Stockholm: Sida, 2005. 
United Nations (UN). International Conference on 
Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of 
Action. New York: UN, 1994. 
UN. Key Actions for the Further Implementation of 
the Programme of Action of the International 
Conference on Population and Development. New 
York: UN, 1999. 
UN Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues. 
Gender Mainstreaming, An Overview. New York: 
UN, 2002. 
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 
AID Policy Paper: Women in Development. 
Washington, DC: USAID Bureau for Program and 
Policy Coordination, 1982. 
White, V., M.E. Greene, and E. Murphy. Men and 
Reproductive Health Programs: Influencing Gender 
Norms. Washington, DC: The Synergy Project: 2003. 
Winder, Roger. HIV and Men Who Have Sex With 
Men in Asia and the Pacific. UNAIDS Best Practice 
Collection. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2006. 
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Gender 
Policy: Integrating Gender Perspectives in the Work 
of WHO. Geneva: WHO, 2002. 
Introduction 
Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, 
M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” 
Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender 
Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to 
Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 
2004. 
Caro, D., J. Schueller, M. Ramsey, and W. Voet. A 
Manual for Integrating Gender into Reproductive 
Health and HIV Programs: From Commitment to 
Action. Prepared on Behalf of the Gender Manual 
Task Force for the Interagency Gender Working 
Group of the USAID Bureau for Global Health. 
Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2003 (2nd 
Edition forthcoming in 2009). 
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria 
(GFATM). The Process for Developing a Strategy on 
the Scaling Up of a Gender-sensitive Response to 
AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria by the Global 
Fund. 9th Policy and Strategy Committee Meeting. 
Geneva: GFATM, 2008. 
Riley, N. “Gender, Power and Population Change.” 
Population Bulletin 52, no. 1 (May 1997). 
Roses, M. “Talking Points from the Director at the 
PAHO International Women’s Day 2008 
Celebration.” Washington, DC: PAHO, 2008. 
Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.paho.org/ 
English/D/DSpeech_IWD08_eng.htm. 
Schuler, Sidney Ruth. In Accommodating, 
Reinforcing Gender Inequity in Family Planning 
Programs. JSI Working Paper no. 14. Boston: JSI, 
1999. 
UN. Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into all 
Policies and Programmes in the United Nations 
System. ECOSOC Resolution 2008/34. New York: 
UN, 2008. 
UN Population Fund (UNFPA). State of the World 
Population. New York: UNFPA, 2008. 
World Bank. Gender Equality as Smart Economics: 
A World Bank Group Gender Action Plan. 
Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2006. 
World Bank. Mainstreaming Gender Considerations 
in the Multi-Country HIV/AIDS Program (MAP): A 
Portfolio Review of Selected Programs. Washington, 
DC: The World Bank, 2006. 
World Health Organization (WHO). Integrating 
Gender Analysis and Actions into the Work of WHO: 
Draft Strategy. Sixtieth World Health Assembly, 
WHA 60_R25. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2007. 
Reducing Unintended Pregnancy 
Bezmalinovic, B., W.S. Duflon, A. Hirschmann, and 
R. Lundgren. Guatemala City Women: Empowering 
a Vulnerable Group to Prevent HIV Transmission. 
Report-in-Brief, Women and AIDS Research 
Program. Washington, DC: ICRW, 1997. 
Biddlecom, Anne and Bolaji M. Fapohunda. “Covert 
Contraceptive Use: Prevalence, Motivations, and 
Consequences.” Studies in Family Planning 29 
(1998): 360-372. 
Blake, Michael and Stella Babalola. Impact of a Male 
Motivation Campaign on Family Planning Ideation 
and Practice in Guinea. Field Report no. 13. 
Baltimore, MD: JHU Bloomberg School of Public 
Health, 2002.
Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, 
M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” 
Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender 
Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to 
Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 
2004. 
Castle, S., M.K. Konate, P.R. Ulin, and S. Martin. “A 
Qualitative Study of Clandestine Contraceptive Use 
in Urban Mali.” Studies in Family Planning 30, no.3 
(1999): 231-248. 
CREHPA. Enabling Women for Reproductive Health: 
The REWARD Project. Washington, DC: CEDPA, 
2002. 
Daniel, E.E., R. Masilamani, and M. Rahman. “The 
Effect of Community-Based Reproductive Health 
Communication Interventions on Contraceptive Use 
Among Young Married Couples in Bihar, India.” 
International Family Planning Perspectives 34, no. 
4 (2008): 189-197. 
Devries, K. “Together for a Happy Family Campaign - 
Jordan.” In Communication Initiative Network, 
2003. 
Diallo, Tanou. Assessing Synergies between the 
PRISM II Bilateral Project and Complementary PVO 
Programs. Washington DC: USAID 2006. 
DiMatteo, M.R. “The Physician-Patient Relationship: 
Effects on the Quality of Health Care.” Clinical 
Obstetrics and Gynecology 37, no.1 (1994):149- 
161. 
Goldberg, H.I. and A. Toros. “The Use of Traditional 
Methods of Contraception Among Turkish Couples.” 
Studies In Family Planning 25, no.2 (1994): 122- 
128. 
Hoang, T.A., T.H. Minh, N.M. Duc, B.T. Thanh Mai, 
P.V. Thien, V.S. Ha, P.T. Thu Ha, Q.T. Trang, S.R. 
Schuler, and D. Santillán. Impact of the Cairo 
Programme of Action: Gender, Women’s 
Empowerment, and Reproductive Health in Four 
Vietnamese Communities. Research Results Report. 
Hanoi, Vietnam: Population and Development 
International, 2002. 
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), 
Western Hemisphere Region. Manual to Evaluate 
Quality of Care from a Gender Perspective. New 
York: IPPF/WHR, 2000. 
Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication 
Programs (JHUCCP). Men in Jordan Get Involved in 
‘Together for a Happy Family’. Baltimore, MD: JHU 
Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2003. 
Lundgren, R.I., J.N. Gribble, M.E. Greene, G.E. 
Emrick, and M. de Monroy. “Cultivating Men’s 
Interest in Family Planning in Rural El Salvador.” 
Studies in Family Planning 36, no. 3 (2005): 173- 
188. 
Palabrica-Costello, M., Z. Mosende, M. Seidman, and 
L. Palma-Aealza. Enhancing NGO-LGU 
Collaboration in Family Planning: Using 
Community Workers to Reach Men in an Agrarian 
Setting. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2001. 
Palenque, E., L. Monano, R. Vernon, F. Gonzales, P. 
Riveros, and J. Bratt. Effects and Costs of 
Implementing a Gender-Sensitive Reproductive 
Health Program. Frontiers Final Report. 
Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004. 
Palenque, E., P. Riveros Hamel, and R. Vernon. 
Consolidating a Gender Perspective in the 
PROCOSI Network. Frontiers Final Report. 
Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007. 
Population Council. “Love, Sex, and Abortion Among 
Unmarried Youth in Ho Chi Minh City: Implications 
for Policy and Program Interventions.” Unpublished 
paper, 2000. 
Robey, B., E. Thomas, S. Baro, S. Kone, and G. 
Kpakpo. Men: Key Partners in Reproductive Health. 
A Report on the First Conference of French- 
Speaking African Countries on Men’s Participation in 
Reproductive Health, March 30-April 3, 
Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Baltimore, MD: JHU/ 
CCP, 1998. 
Salke, Taraneh R. “Lessons from the Field: Using a 
Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives 
and Doctors in Afghanistan.” Poster presented at the 
2007 APHA Conference. Washington, DC: Family 
Health Alliance, 2007. 
Schuler, Sidney Ruth and Zakir Hossain. “Family 
Planning Clinics Through Women’s Eyes and Voices: 
A Case Study from Rural Bangladesh.” International 
Family Planning Perspectives 24, no. 4 (1998):170- 
175, 205. 
Schuler, S.R., E.N. McIntosh, M.C. Goldstein, and 
B.R. Pande. “Barriers to the Effective Use of Family 
Planning Services in Kathmandu.” Studies in Family 
Planning 16, no. 5 (1985): 26-27. 
Schuler, S.R., L. Bates, and M.K. Islam. “Reconciling 
Cost Recovery with Health Equity Concerns in a 
Context of Gender Inequality and Poverty.” 
International Family Planning Perspectives 28, no. 
4 (2002): 196-204. 
Schuler, S.R., M.E. Choque, and S. Rance. 
“Misinformation, Mistrust, and Mistreatment: Family 
Planning among Bolivian Market Women.” Studies in 
Family Planning 25, no.4 (1994): 211-221. 
86 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
References 87 
Schuler, S.R., S.M. Hashemi, A. Cullum, and M. 
Hassan. “The Advent of Family Planning as a Social 
Norm in Bangladesh.” Reproductive Health Matters 
7 (1996): 66-78. 
Sedgh G., R. Hussain, A. Bankole, and S. Singh. 
Women with an Unmet Need for Contraception in 
Developing Countries and Their Reasons for Not 
Using a Method. Occasional Report no. 37. New 
York: Guttmacher Institute, 2007. 
UNICEF, CDC. “UNICEF and CDC Report on 
Afghanistan Women’s Health.” Public Health Report 
117, no.6 (2002):592. 
Upadhyay, U.D. Informed Choice in Family 
Planning: Helping People Decide. Population 
Reports, Series J, No. 50. Baltimore, MD: JHU 
Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2001. 
Wilder, J., R. Masilamani, and E.E. Daniel. 
Promoting Change in the Reproductive Behavior of 
Youth: Pathfinder International’s PRACHAR Project. 
New Delhi: Pathfinder International, 2005. 
Improving Maternal Health 
Atkinson, S., and M. Farias. “Perceptions of Risk 
During Pregnancy Amongst Urban Women in 
Northeast Brazil.” Social Science and Medicine 45, 
no. 12 (1995): 1789-1804. 
Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, 
M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” 
Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender 
Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to 
Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 
2004. 
Bradby, Barbara. “Will I Return or Not? Migrant 
Women in Bolivia Negotiate Hospital Birth.” 
Women’s Studies International Forum 22, no. 3 
(1999): 287-301. 
CARE. The FEMME Project in Peru: Partnerships 
for Improved Health. From the Series Voices for the 
Village. Atlanta, Georgia: CARE, 2007. 
Hoang, T.A., T.H. Minh, N.M. Duc, B.T. Thanh Mai, 
P.V. Thien, V.S. Ha, P.T. Thu Ha, Q.T. Trang, S.R. 
Schuler, and D. Santillán. Impact of the Cairo 
Programme of Action: Gender, Women’s 
Empowerment, and Reproductive Health in Four 
Vietnamese Communities. Research Results Report. 
Hanoi, Vietnam: Population and Development 
International, 2002. 
Hodnett, E. “Caregiver Support for Women During 
Childbirth.” In Cochrane Review. Oxford: Cochrane 
Library, 2001. 
Hundskopf, M.P.G., L.C. Ancaya, R.H. La Rosa, 
J.A.C. Quiroz, V.C.S. Condor, J. Goulden, G.F. 
Martinelli, A.F. Arroyo, D.F. Borjas, and E.E. Leon. 
Impact of the FEMME Project in Reducing Maternal 
Mortality and its Significance for Health Policy in 
Peru. Lima: Ministry of Health, 2006. 
ICRW. “Social Mobilization or Government Services: 
What Influences Married Adolescents’ Reproductive 
Health in Rural Maharashtra, India?” In Briefing Kit, 
Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and 
Unmarried Youth in India. Washington, DC: ICRW, 
2006. 
Jessop, S.M., C. Morrissey, E. Dusch, A. Cox, and E. 
Jonas, eds. MotherCare’s Initiatives: Actions and 
Results of 31 Projects, 1993- 2000. Arlington, VA: 
John Snow, Inc., 2000. 
Kunene, B., M. Beksinska, S. Zondi, N. Mthembu, S. 
Mullick, E. Ottolenghi, I. Kleinschmidt, S. 
Adamchak, B. Janowitz, and C. Cuthbertson. 
Involving Men in Maternity Care: South Africa. 
FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington, DC: 
Population Council, 2004. 
Nachbar, N. Report on the Use of the Community 
Diagnosis to Explore Safe Motherhood: A Two 
Country Comparison and Methodological Critique. 
Technical Working Paper #6. Arlington, VA: John 
Snow, Inc., MotherCare, 1997. 
Pande, R., K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. MacQuarrie, and S. 
Jain. Improving the Reproductive Health of Married 
and Unmarried Youth in India: Evidence of 
Effectiveness and Costs from Community-Based 
Interventions. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. 
Raju, Saraswati and Ann Leonard, eds. Men as 
Supportive Partners in Reproductive Health: 
Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. New Delhi, India: 
The Population Council South and East Asia 
Regional Office, 2000. 
Ronsmans, C. and W.J. Graham. “Maternal Mortality: 
Who, When, Where and Why.” The Lancet 368, no. 
9542 (2006): 1189-1200. 
Roth, D., and M. Mbizvo. “Promoting Safe 
Motherhood in the Community: The Case for 
Strategies That Include Men.” African Journal of 
Reproductive Health 5, no. 2 (2001): 10-21. 
Sargent, Carolyn Fishel. Maternity, Medicine, and 
Power: Reproductive Decisions in Urban Benin. 
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. 
Schuler, S.R., L. Bates, and M.K. Islam. “Paying for 
Reproductive Health Services in Bangladesh: 
Intersections Between Cost, Quality and Culture.” 
Health Policy and Planning 17, no. 3 (2002).
Sen, G., P. Ostlin, and A. George. Unequal, Unfair, 
Ineffective and Inefficient Gender Inequity in 
Health: Why It Exists and How We Can Change It. 
Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social 
Determinants of Health. Women and Gender Equity 
Knowledge Network. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska 
Institutet, 2007. 
Sosa, R., J. Kennell, M. Klaus, S. Robertson, and J. 
Urrutia. “The Effect of a Supportive Companion on 
Perinatal Problems, Length of Labor, and Mother- 
Infant Interaction.” New England Journal of 
Medicine 303, no. 11 (1980): 597-600. 
Varkey, L.C., A. Mishra, A. Das, E. Ottolenghi, D. 
Huntington, S. Adamchak, M.E. Khan, and F. Homan. 
Involving Men in Maternity Care in India. New 
Delhi: Population Council, 2004. 
Vissandjee, B., R. Barlow, and D. Fraser. “Utilization 
of Health Services Among Rural Women in Gujurat, 
India.” Public Health 111 (1997): 135-148. 
World Health Organization (WHO). “Maternal Health 
and Safe Motherhood: Findings From Concluded 
Research Studies.” World Health Statistics 
Quarterly 48 (1995): 2-3. 
Zhang, J., J.W. Bernasko, E. Leybovich, M. Fahs, and 
M.C. Hatch. “Continuous Labor Support From Labor 
Attendant for Primiparous Women: A Meta- 
Analysis.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 88, no.4 
(1996): 739-744. 
Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 
Alam, A., U. Rob, and M.E. Kahn. Integration of 
Reproductive Health Services for Men in Health and 
Family Welfare Centers in Bangladesh. Dhaka: 
National Institution for Population Research and 
Training, 2004. 
Antwi, P.M. and Y.P.A. Oppong. “Ghana’s Attempts at 
Managing the HIV/AIDS Epidemic. A Review of 
Efforts.” Working Paper Series16, no. 6 in Series on 
HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sex, Gender and 
Policy. Boston: Harvard Center for Population and 
Development Studies, 2003. 
Baek, C., V. Mathambo, S. Mkhize, I. Friedman, L. 
Apicella, and N. Rutenberg. Key Findings from an 
Evaluation of the mothers3mothers Program in 
KwaZulu-Nata, South Africa. Washington, DC: 
Horizons Program, 2007. 
Barker, G., C. Ricardo, and M. Nascimento. 
Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-Based 
Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme 
Interventions. Geneva: WHO, 2007. 
Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, 
M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” 
Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender 
Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to 
Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 
2004. 
Britstein, P., A. Boulle, D. Nash, M. Brinkhof, F. 
Dabis, C. Laurent, M. Schechter, S. Tuboi, E. Sprinz, 
P. Miotti, M. Hosseinipour, M. May, M.Egger, D. 
Bangsberg, N. Low, and the Antiretroviral Therapy in 
Lower Income Countries (ART-LINC) Study Group. 
“Gender and the Use of Antiretroviral Treatment in 
Resource Constrained Settings: Finding from a 
Multicenter Collaboration.” Journal of Women’s 
Health 17, no.1 (2008): 47-55. 
Edwards, M. “Gender Inequality and the AIDS 
Epidemic.” SIECUS Report 29, no. 5 (June/July, 
2001). 
Espinoza, Henry. “Using Edutainment and Social 
Activities to Challenge Machismo in Nicaragua.” 
Sexual Health Exchange 2(2005): 9-10. 
Family Health International (FHI). Summary Report 
of Key Findings and Program Recommendations 
from FHI MSM Program Evaluations. Bangladesh, 
Indonesia and Nepal: Asia Pacific and Regional 
Office, FHI, 2007. 
Fitzgerald, D., F. Behets, A. Caliendo, D. Roberfroid, 
C. Lucet, J. Fritzgerald, and L. Kukyens. “Economic 
Hardship and Sexually Transmitted Diseases in 
Haiti’s Rural Arbonite Valley.” American Journal of 
Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 62, no. 4 (2000): 
496-501. 
Hossain, S.M.I., U. Rob, M.E. Kahn, A. Al Sabir, and 
A. Alam. “Integration of Male and Female 
Reproductive Health Services in Bangladesh With an 
Emphasis on Increasing Male Participation 
Awareness.” Population Review 43, no.2 (2004): 
88-100. 
Human Rights Watch (HRW). Double Standards: 
Women’s Property Rights Violations in Kenya. New 
York: HRW, 2002. 
HRW. A Test of Inequity: Discrimination against 
Women Living with HIV in the Dominican Republic. 
Washington, DC: HRW, 2004. 
Jewkes, R., M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, 
N. Khuzwayo, M. Koss, A. Puren, K. Wood, and N. 
Duvvury. “A Cluster Randomized-Controlled Trial to 
Determine the Effectiveness of Stepping Stones in 
Preventing HIV Infections and Promoting Safer 
Sexual Behaviour Amongst Youth in the Rural 
Eastern Cape, South Africa: Trial Design, Methods 
and Baseline Findings.” Tropical Medicine and 
International Health 11, no.1 (2006): 3-16. 
88 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
References 89 
Jewkes, R., M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, 
A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. “Impact of Stepping 
Stones on HIV, HSV-2 and Sexual Behaviour in Rural 
South Africa: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.” 
British Medical Journal 337(2008). 
Jewkes, R., M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, 
K. Wood, M. Koss, A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. 
Evaluation of Stepping Stones: A Gender 
Transformative HIV Prevention Intervention. A 
Policy Brief. Pretoria: Medical Research Council, 
2007. 
Kruger, V. “Evaluation Report: Men as Partners 
Program, Program Evaluation and Research Service.” 
September, 2000 (unpublished). 
Levack, Andrew. “Educating Men in South Africa on 
Gender Issues: The ‘Men as Partners’ Program.” 
SIECUS Report 29, no. 5 (2001): 13-15. 
Maganja, R. K., S. Maman, A. Groves, and J.K. 
Mbwambo. “Skinning the Goat and Pulling the Load: 
Transactional Sex Among Youth in Dar es Salaam, 
Tanzania.” AIDS Care 19, no. 8 (2007): 974-981. 
Mbwambo, Jessie and Suzanne Maman . HIV and 
Violence Prevention. Horizons Final Report. 
Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007. 
Mocumbi, P. “A Time for Frankness on AIDS in 
Africa.” New York Times, June 20, 2001. Cited in M. 
Edwards,“Gender Inequity and the AIDS Epidemic.” 
SEICUS Report 9, no. 5 (June/July 2001). 
Palabrica-Costello, M., Z. Mosende, M. Seidman, and 
L. Palma-Aealza. Enhancing NGO-LGU 
Collaboration in Family Planning: Using 
Community Workers to Reach Men in an Agrarian 
Setting. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2001. 
Population Council/Horizons, CORO for Literacy, 
MAMTA, and Instituto Promundo. Yaari Dosti: Young 
Men Redefine Masculinity: A Training Manual. New 
Delhi: Population Council, 2006. 
Pulerwitz, J., G. Barker, M. Segundo, and M. 
Nascimento. Promoting More Gender-equitable 
Norms and Behaviors Among Young Men as an HIV/ 
AIDS Prevention Strategy. Washington, DC: Horizons 
Program, 2006. 
Rock, Y. “Television, Gender, and Change: The Case 
of ‘Sexto Sentido’ Television, an Education- 
Entertainment Initiative in Nicaragua.” Master’s 
Thesis. Great Britain, Cambridge University, 2005. 
Shepard, Bonnie L. “Addressing Gender Issues with 
Men and Couples: Involving Men in Sexual and 
Reproductive Health Services in APROFE, Ecuador.” 
International Journal of Men’s Health 3, no. 3 
(2004): 155-172. 
Solórzano, I., A. Bank, R. Peña, H. Espinoza, M. 
Ellsberg, and J. Pulerwitz. Catalyzing Personal and 
Social Change Around Gender, Sexuality, and HIV: 
Impact Evaluation of Puntos de Encuentro’s 
Communication Strategy in Nicaragua. Washington, 
DC: Population Council, 2008. 
UNAIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update December 2007. 
Geneva: UNAIDS, 2007. 
UNIFEM. Gender and AIDS Web Portal. Accessed 
Dec. 1, 2009, at www.genderandaids.org. 
Verma, R., J. Pulerwitz, V. Mahendra, S. Khandekar, 
G. Barker, P. Fulpagare, and S.K. Singh. “Challenging 
and Changing Gender Attitudes among Young Men in 
Mumbai, India.” Reproductive Health Matters 14, 
no.28 (2006): 135-143. 
Verma, R., J. Pulerwitz, V. Mahendra, S. Khandekar, 
A.K. Singh, S.S. Das, S. Mehra, A. Nura, and G. 
Barker. Promoting Gender Equity as a Strategy to 
Reduce HIV Risk and Gender-based Violence Among 
Young Men in India. Washington, DC: Population 
Council, 2008. 
Weissman, A., J. Cocker, L. Sherburne, M.B. Powers, 
R. Lovich, and M. Mukaka. “Cross-generational 
Relationships: Using a ‘Continuum of Volition’ in 
HIV-Prevention Work among Young People.” Gender 
 Development 14, no. 1 (2006): 81-94. 
Eliminating Harmful Practices 
Adhikari, R. K. “Early Marriage and Childbearing: 
Risks and Consequences.” In S. Bott, et al., eds. 
Toward Adulthood: Exploring the Sexual and 
Reproductive Health of Adolescents in South Asia. 
Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. 
Bongaarts, J. Population Policy Options in the 
Developing World. Research Division Working Paper 
No. 59. New York: The Population Council, 1994. 
Caldwell, B.K. and J.C. Caldwell. “Below- 
Replacement fertility: Determinants and Prospects in 
South Asia.” Journal of Population Research 20, no. 
1 (2003), 19–34. 
CARE. Awash FGC Elimination Project. Final 
Evaluation Report. Addis Ababa: CARE/ Ethiopia, 
2005. 
Chege, J., I. Askew, S. Igras, and J.K. Muteshi. 
Testing the Effectiveness of Integrating Community- 
Based Approaches for Encouraging Abandonment 
of Female Genital Cutting into CARE’s Reproductive 
Health Programs in Ethiopia and Kenya. Nairobi: 
FRONTIERS in Reproductive Health and CARE, 
2004.
Diop, N.J., M.M. Faye, A. Moreau, J. Cabral, H. 
Benga, F. Cisse, B. Mane, I. Baumgarten, and M. 
Melching. The Tostan Program: Evaluation of a 
Community Based Education Program in Senegal. 
New York: Population Council, 2004. 
Erulkar A., T. Mekbib, N. Simie, and T. Gulema. The 
Experience of Adolescence in Rural Amhara Region, 
Ethiopia. Accra: Population Council, 2004. 
Feldman-Jacobs, Charlotte and Sarah Ryniak. 
Abandoning Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: An 
In-Depth Look at Promising Practices. Washington, 
DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2006. 
Garcia-Moreno, C., L. Heise, H. Jansen, M. Ellsberg, 
and C. Watts. “Violence Against Women.” In Science 
310, no. 5752 (2005): 1282-1283. 
Goqwana, A., B. Khumalo, D. Peacock, J. Treat, K. 
Evans, N. Khanyile, S. Wilson, and T. Oakes. Sonke 
Gender Justice Network Annual Report: August 1, 
2006 - July 31, 2007. Johannesburg, Sonke Gender 
Justice Network. 
Heise, Lori and Claudia Garcia-Moreno. “Violence by 
Intimate Partners.” In E. Krug, L. Dahlberg, J. Mercy, 
A. Zwi and R. Lozano, eds. World Report on Violence 
and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health 
Organization, 2002. 
Heise, L., M. Ellsberg, and M. Gottemoeller. “Ending 
Violence Against Women.” Population Reports, 
Series L. No. 11. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins 
School of Public Health, 1999. 
Heise, L., M. Ellsberg, and M. Gottemoeller. “A 
Global Overview of Gender-Based Violence.” 
International Journal of Gynaecological Obstetrics 
78, no. S1 (2002):5-14. 
Heise L., J. Pitanguy, and A. Germain. Violence 
Against Women: The Hidden Health Burden. World 
Bank Discussion Paper 255.Washington, DC: World 
Bank, 1994. 
ICRW. (2004). Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural 
Maharashtra, India. Washington, DC, ICRW: 2 pages. 
Jones, H., N. Diop, and I. Kabore. “FGC Practices in 
Burkina Faso and Mali and Their Negative Health 
Outcomes. Studies in Family Planning 30, no. 3 
(1999) 219-230. 
Kim, J.C., C.H. Watts, J.R. Hargreaves, L.X. Hdhlovu, 
G. Phetla, L.A. Morison, J. Busza, J.D.H. Proter, and 
P. Pronyk. “Understanding the Impact of a 
Microfinance-Based Intervention on Women’s 
Empowerment and the Reduction of Intimate 
Partner Violence in South Africa.” American 
Journal of Public Health 97, no. 10 (2007): 1974- 
1802. 
Kishor, S. and K. Johnson. Profiling Domestic 
Violence: A Multi-Country Study. Calverton, 
Maryland: ORC Macro, 2004. 
Mathews, S., N. Abrahams, L. Martin, L. Vetten, L. 
van der Merwe, and R. Jewkes. Every Six Hours a 
Woman Is Killed by her Intimate Partner: A 
National Study of Female Homicide in South Africa. 
Gender and Health Research Group. Pretoria, South 
Africa: Medical Research Council, 2004. 
Mathur, S., M. Greene, and A. Malhotra. Too Young 
to Wed: The Lives, Rights and Health of Young 
Married Girls. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2003. 
Morison, L., C. Scherf, G. Ekpo et al. “The Long-term 
RH Consequences of FGC in Rural Gambia: A 
Community-Based Survey.” Tropical Med and Intl 
Health 6:8 (2001): 643-653. 
Ouoba, D., Z. Congo, N.J. Diop, M. Melching, B. 
Banza, G. Guiella, I. Baumgarten. Experience from a 
Community-Based Education Program in Burkina 
Faso: The Tostan Project. Frontiers Final Report. 
Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004. 
Pande, R., K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. MacQuarrie, and S. 
Jain. Improving the Reproductive Health of Married 
and Unmarried Youth in India: Evidence of 
Effectiveness and Costs from Community-Based 
Interventions. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. 
Peacock, Dean. Sonke Gender Justice and the One 
Man Can Campaign. Johannesburg, South Africa: 
One Man Can Campaign, 2008. 
Population Reference Bureau. Female Genital 
Mutilation/Cutting: Data and Trends. Washington, 
DC: PRB, 2008. 
Pronyk, P.M., J.C. Kim, J.R. Hargreaves, M.B. 
Makhubele, L.A. Morison, C. Watts, and J.D.H. 
Porter. “Microfinance and HIV Prevention: Emerging 
Lessons from Rural South Afirca.” In Small 
Enterprise Development 16, no. 3 (2005): 26-38. 
Rajadurai, H. and S. Igras. CARE’s Experience 
Working with Communities toward Abandonment 
of Female Genital Cutting (FGC). Atlanta, Georgia: 
CARE, 2005. 
UNICEF. Early Marriage: Child Spouses. Innocenti 
Digest 7. Florence: UNICEF, Innocenti Research 
Centre, 2001. 
UNICEF. Toward a Common Framework for the 
Abandonment of FGM/C. New York: UNICEF on 
behalf of the Donors Working Group on FGM/C, 
2007. 
90 
Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
References 91 
Usdin, S., E. Scheepers, S. Goldstein, and G. Japhet. 
“Achieving Social Change on Gender-Based 
Violence: A Report on the Impact Evaluation of Soul 
City’s Fourth Series.” Social Science  Medicine 61 
(2005): 2434-2445. 
Wilder, J., R. Masilamani, and E.E. Daniel. 
Promoting Change in the Reproductive Behavior of 
Youth: Pathfinder International’s PRACHAR Project. 
New Delhi: Pathfinder International, 2005. 
World Health Organization (WHO). Eliminating 
Female Genital Mutilation: An Interagency 
Statement. Geneva: WHO, 2008. 
WHO Study Group on Female Genital Mutilation and 
Obstetric Outcome. “Female Genital Mutilation and 
Obstetric Outcome: WHO Collaborative Prospective 
Study in Six African Countries.” The Lancet 367 
(2006):1835. 
Meeting the Needs of Youth 
African Youth Alliance (AYA). (2008). Accessed 
online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.pathfind.org. 
Blakemore, J.E.O. “Children’s Beliefs about Violating 
Gender Norms: Boys Shouldn’t Look like Girls, and 
Girls Shouldn’t Act like Boys.” Sex Role 48 (2003): 
411-419. 
Brady, M., R. Assaad, B. Ibrahim, A. Salem, R. 
Salem, and N. Zibani. Providing New Opportunities 
to Adolescent Girls in Socially Conservative 
Settings: The ISHRAQ Program in Rural Upper 
Egypt. New York, Population Council, 2007. 
CARE Georgia. Guria Adolescent Health Project 
(GAHP). CARE International in Georgia; Baseline 
Survey. Tbilisi: CARE Georgia, 2005. 
CARE Georgia. Guria Adolescent Health Project 
(GAHP). Final Evaluation. Tbilisi: CARE Georgia, 
2007. 
CEDPA. New Visions: Life Skills Education for Boys. 
Washington, DC: CEDPA, 2005. 
Eggleston, E., J. Jackson, and K. Hardee. “Sexual 
Attitudes and Behavior Among Young Adolescents in 
Jamaica.” International Family Planning 
Perspectives 25, no.2 (1999):78-84  91. 
Erulkar, Annabel S. and Erica Chong. Evaluation of 
a Savings  Micro-Credit Program for Vulnerable 
Young Women in Nairobi. New York: Population 
Council, 2005. 
Grant, M.J., B. Mensch, and M.P. Sebastian. 
Introducing Adolescent Livelihoods Training in the 
Slums of Allahabad, India. New York: Population 
Council, 2007. 
Green, C.P., M. Selim, A. Gamal, and O. Mandil. 
Promoting Gender Senstivity among Boys in Egypt. 
Washington, DC: CEDPA, 2006. 
Grunseit A. Impact of HIV and Sexual Health 
Education on the Sexual Behaviour of Young 
People: A Review Update. UNAIDS Best Practice 
Collection. Geneva: UNAIDS, 1997. 
Hayden, Rebecca. Young Men Like Us: Experiences 
and Changes in Sex, Relationships and 
Reproductive Health among Young, Urban 
Cambodian Men. Phnom Penh: CARE International/ 
Cambodia, 2007. 
Kirby D. Emerging Answers 2007: Research 
Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy 
and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, 
DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and 
Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007. 
Kirby, D., B.A. Laris, and L. Rolleri. Sex and HIV 
Education Programs for Youth: Their Impact and 
Important Characteristics. Research Triangle Park, 
NC: Family Health International, 2006. 
Palenque, E., L. Monano, R.Vernon, F. Gonzales, P. 
Riveros, and J. Bratt. Effects and Costs of 
Implementing a Gender-Sensitive Reproductive 
Health Program. Frontiers Final Report. Washington, 
DC: Population Council, 2004. 
Pettifor A., A. van der Straten, M. Dunbar, S. 
Shiboski, and N. Padian. “Early Age of First Sex: A 
Risk Factor for HIV Infection among Women in 
Zimbabwe.” In AIDS 18, no.10 (2004):1435-1442. 
Cited in: J. Gay, K. Hardee, M. Wood, C. Wingfield, 
E. Kidder, K. Fleming, A. Hairston, and F. Cleghorn. 
HIV/AIDS Interventions: What is the Evidence? 
Washington, DC: The POLICY Project, 2005. 
Population Council. Meeting the Health and Social 
Needs of Married Girls in India: The First Time 
Parents Project’s Implementation and Reach. New 
Delhi: Population Council, 2006. 
Pulerwitz, J., G. Barker, M. Segundo, and M. 
Nascimento. Promoting More Gender-equitable 
Norms and Behaviors among Young Men as an HIV/ 
AIDS Prevention Strategy. Washington, DC: Horizons 
Program: 2006. 
Santhya, K.G. and N. Haberland. Empowering Young 
Mothers in India: Results of the First-time Parents 
Project. New York: Population Council, 2007.
Santhya, K.G., N. Haberland, A. Das et al. 
Empowering Married Young Women and Improving 
their Sexual and Reproductive Health: Effects of the 
First-time Parents Project. New Delhi: Population 
Council, 2008 
Save the Children. ISHRAQ: Safe Places for Out-of 
School Adolescent Girls to Learn, Play and Grow. 
Empowering Rural Girls in Egypt. Westport, CT: 
Save the Children, 2004. 
Schuler, Sidney Ruth and Zakir Hossain. “Family 
Planning Clinics through Women’s Eyes and Voices: A 
Case Study from Rural Bangladesh.” International 
Family Planning Perspectives 24, no.4 (1998): 170- 
175, 205. 
Schuler, S.R., M.E. Choque, and S. Rance. 
“Misinformation, Mistrust and Mistreatment: Family 
Planning among Bolivian Market Women.” In Studies 
in Family Planning 25, no.4 (1994): 211-21. 
Sebastian, M.P., M. Grant, and B. Mensch. 
Integrating Adolescent Livelihood Activities Within 
A Reproductive Health Programme For Urban Slum 
Dwellers In India. Washington DC: Population 
Council, 2005. 
Solorzano, I., A. Bank, R. Pena, H. Espinoza, M. Ellsberg, 
and J. Pulerwitz. Catalyzing Individual and Social 
Change around Gender, Sexuality and HIV: Impact 
Evaluation of Puntos de Encuentro’s Communication 
Strategy in Nicaragua. Horizons Final Report. 
Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. 
Storer, Graeme. Sexual and Reproductive Health 
Programming for Young Urban Males. Phnom Penh: 
CARE International/Cambodia, 2007. 
Stromquist, N.P. “The Gender Socialization Process 
in Schools: A Cross-National Comparison.” Paper 
Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 
2008, Education for All by 2015: Will We Make It? 
Paris: UNESCO, 2007. 
UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/ 
AIDS). 2007 AIDS Epidemic Update. Geneva, 
Switzerland: UNAIDS, 2007. 
UNICEF. Children and HIV and AIDS. Accessed 
online July 1, 2009, at www.unicef.org/aids. 
UN Population Division (2008). Online database. 
Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009, at http://esa.un.org/unpp. 
Verma, R., J. Pulerwitz, V.S. Mahendra, S. Khandkar, 
A.K. Singh, S.S. Das, S. Mehra, A. Nura, and G. 
Barker. Promoting Gender Equality as a Strategy to 
Reduce HIV Risk and Gender-bases Violence Among 
Young Men in India. Horizons Final Report. 
Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. 
WHO. Maternal Mortality Update: Delivering into Good 
Hands. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. 
Williams, T., S. Mullen, A. Karim, and J. Posner. 
Evaluation of the African Youth Alliance Program in 
Ghana, Tanzania, and Uganda. Arlington, VA: John 
Snow Inc., 2007. 
Conclusions 
Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, M.E. 
Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” Report: A 
Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into 
Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. 
Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2004. 
Longwe, S.H. “Gender Awareness: The Missing 
Element in the Third World Development Project.” 
In T. Wallace and C.March, eds. Changing 
Perceptions: Writings on Gender and Development. 
Oxford, England: Oxfam, 1991. 
Moser, C. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, 
Practice and Training. London: Routledge, 1993. 
Overholt, C.A., K. Cloud, M.B. Anderson, and J.E. 
Austin. “Women in Development: A Framework for 
Project Analysis.” In C.A. Overholt, M.B. Anderson, 
K. Cloud, and J.E. Austin, eds. Gender Roles in 
Development Projects. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian 
Press, 1985. 
Pfannenschmidt, S., A. McKay, and E. McNeill. 
Through a Gender Lens: Resources for Population, 
Health and Nutrition Projects. Research Triangle 
Park, NC: Family Health International, 1996. 
Swedish International Development Cooperation 
Agency (Sida), Department for Democracy and 
Social Development, Gender Equality Team. Policy 
Promoting Gender Equality in Development 
Cooperation. Stockholm: Sida, 2005. 
United Nations (UN). International Conference on 
Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of 
Action. New York: UN, 1994. 
UN. Key Actions for the Further Implementation of 
the Programme of Action of the International 
Conference on Population and Development. New 
York: UN, 1999. 
UN Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues. 
Gender Mainstreaming, An Overview. New York: 
UN, 2002. 
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 
AID Policy Paper: Women in Development. 
Washington, DC: USAID Bureau for Program and 
Policy Coordination, 1982. 
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Gender 
Policy: Integrating Gender Perspectives in the Work 
of WHO. Geneva: WHO, 2002. 
9922 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Glossary 
4-Cell Design. Study designs that involve four treatment arms are called factorial designs, 4-cell designs, or 
2x2 designs. These designs aims to test two different interventions (each alone and combined) against a con-trol, 
which receives no intervention. The following diagram illustrates this study design for two interventions 
Glossary 93 
(A and B): 
Group 1 A  B A only Group 2 
Group 3 B only Control (Neither A or B) Group 4 
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). Antiretroviral drugs are medications for the treatment of infection by HIV. Different 
classes of antiretroviral drugs act at different stages of the HIV life cycle. These drugs are also known as ARVs. 
In people who have been infected with HIV, ART can lengthen and improve their quality of life. 
Baseline. Baseline refers to the period prior to (or at the introduction of) an intervention. Data is gathered at 
this point to compare with performance after the intervention to determine what change has taken place. 
Chi Square Test. A statistical test that measures whether the distribution of observed data systematically differs 
from what we would expect if the data were distributed evenly, with no difference between the comparison 
groups. 
Cluster Randomized Control Trial. In this type of RCT, clusters, such as communities, hospitals, or other groups 
of people, are randomized, and all consenting persons in the group are enrolled. 
Community-Based Survey. A survey where the participants are selected from a pre-defined community. 
Community-based research often involves more interaction with the community, such as the use of peers or 
members of the community to recruit or conduct the survey, or community input into the research questions 
and design of the survey. 
Contamination. Contamination occurs when there is communication about the intervention between groups of 
participants (usually treatment and control). This can lead to a diffusion of treatment, because, consciously or 
subconsciously, the control group receives part or all of the intervention. Contamination can also occur if the 
intervention is not fully implemented. 
Control Group. When an intervention is randomly assigned in an experimental study design, the control group 
does not receive the intervention. The control group is supposed to be comparable to the intervention group, 
which receives the intervention. If entire groups or communities are randomly assigned, it is referred to as a 
‘control area’. 
Correlated Data. When data are correlated, there is a relationship between two or more sources of data. This 
means that they tend to vary, be associated, or occur together in a way not expected on the basis of chance 
alone. For example, if a group of participants in a study respond in a predictable manner, there is a correla-tion 
among that group. This is often the case among participants who are selected through one health facility. 
Cost Effectiveness Analysis. This form of analysis seeks to determine the costs and effectiveness of surveillance 
and response strategies and activities. It can be used to compare similar or alternative strategies and activities 
to determine the relative degree to which they will obtain the desired objectives or outcomes. The preferred 
strategy or action is one that has the least cost to produce a given level of effectiveness, or provides the great-est 
effectiveness for a given level of cost.
Cox Proportional Hazard. This is a form of statistical analysis. It is a survival analysis measuring the proportional 
difference in the length of time to an event between two populations. 
Endline. Endline refers to the period after an intervention is completed. Data gathered at this point is usually 
compared with performance before the intervention to determine what change has taken place. 
Equality. Gender equality is equal treatment of women and men in laws and policies and equal access to 
resources and services within families, communities, and society at large. 
Equity. Gender equity connotes fairness and justice in the distribution of opportunities, responsibilities, and 
benefits available to men and women, and the strategies and processes used to achieve gender equality. Equity 
is the means, equality is the result. 
Evaluation. The use of social science research procedures to systematically investigate the effectiveness of 
social intervention programs that are designed to improve social conditions. 
Experimental. Experimental studies control the allocation of treatment (intervention) to subjects (participants). 
The distinguishing feature of experimental studies in evaluation is randomization. In evaluation research, par-ticipants 
or groups are randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Randomly 
assigning the groups helps ensure that the intervention and control groups are comparable to each other so 
that any differences at endline can be attributed to the intervention. 
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Often referred to as a harmful traditional practice, this involves the cutting or 
alteration of the female genitalia for social rather than medical reasons. 
Focus Group Discussion. Focus groups are a form of qualitative data collection. Focus groups usually consist of 
8-10 people who are similar in background. They may be randomly or purposively selected to participate. 
Conversation is guided by a facilitator. Focus groups tend to weed out extreme or false views, and uncover 
underlying group norms. 
Follow-up. This is often used interchangeably with the term endline. In some cases, however, follow-up refers 
to data collection that occurs some period of time after endline. In these cases, endline is the data collection 
point at the end of the intervention, and follow-up occurs later to see what changes are sustained over time 
without the intervention. 
Formative Research. Formative research takes place before or during the design of the intervention itself. The 
results of formative research guide the design of the program to make it most effective and acceptable to the 
target population. Formative research is often done as a needs assessment, pretesting to ensure the interven-tion 
can be implemented, or collection of qualitative data such as focus groups. 
Gender. This term refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a given soci-ety 
considers appropriate for men and women. 
Gender-based Violence. A term used to distinguish violence that targets individuals or groups of indiciduals on 
the basis of their gender from other forms of violence; may result in physical sexual or psychological harm. 
Terms such as Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, and Domestic Violence are used to describe gen-der- 
based violence in its various forms. 
Gender Norms. Societal messages that dictate what is appropriate or expected behavior for males and females. 
Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART). A combination of several (usually three or four) antiretroviral drugs 
is known as Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. HAART is often more effective than using one antiretroviral 
drug alone. See antiretroviral therapy. 
Incidence. The rate of new cases of a disease or event in a population. While prevalence is the measure of all 
cases at one point in time, incidence measures the number of new cases during a time period. 
Intrapartum. Occurring during or pertaining to labour and/or delivery. 
Matched Control. When randomization is not possible, individual cases may be matched with individual con-trols 
that have similar characteristics, such as age. By carefully selecting matches for the intervention cases or 
groups, the intervention and comparison groups should be similar. 
94 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
Maternal Morbidity. This refers to a diseased state, illness, or departure from health as a result of pregnancy, 
termination of pregnancy, labour and delivery, or from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or 
its management. 
Maternal Mortality. A maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination 
of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggra-vated 
by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental causes. The Maternal Mortality Ratio is 
Glossary 95 
the number of maternal deaths out of 100,000 live births in a given year. 
Monitoring Data. Data that come from the regular observation, surveillance, or checking of changes in a condi-tion 
or situation, or changes in activities. Health facilities often use systematic collection of data on specified 
indicators to provide management with indications of the extent of progress and achievement of objectives. 
Non-Equivalent Control Group. In quasi-experimental study designs, in which treatment and comparison groups 
are not randomly assigned, the group that does not receive the intervention is called a non-equivalent control 
group. The term ‘comparison group’ is also used. 
Non-Experimental. Non-experimental study designs do not involve randomization or comparison groups. These 
designs are not able to determine the effect or impact of an intervention, but may be helpful to determine rea-sons 
why a problem exists or why a program was successful. Non-experimental evaluation designs include 
post-test only, pretest-posttest without comparison groups, observational studies, or studies using only qualita-tive 
data. 
Pilot Project. Pilot projects, similar to formative research, are designed to inform about the success of an inter-vention 
prior to launching a full-scale intervention. Pilot projects are usually a shorter version of the interven-tion 
or include a smaller population. Pilots can help to inform whether the population understands, responds, 
or uses the intervention in the anticipated manner. The results of a pilot study are used to refine the interven-tion 
before the full-scale program. 
Postpartum. Of, occurring, or referring to the period after childbirth. 
Prenatal. Occurring or existing before birth, or preceding birth. It refers to both the care of the woman during 
pregnancy and the growth and development of the fetus. It is also known as antenatal. 
Pretest-Posttest. This is a study design in which both the experimental (intervention) and control groups 
receive an initial measurement observation (known as baseline or pretest). The experimental group then 
receives the intervention, but the control group does not. After the intervention, a second set of measurement 
observations is made (known as endline or posttest). 
Prevalence. The amount of a given disease in a population at a certain time. Prevalence is the measure of all 
cases at a point in time, while incidence is the measure of new cases during a time period. 
Process Variable. An indicator or measurement that is used as part of an evaluation to gauge the implementa-tion 
or monitor the intervention or program. The variable focuses on the process of the intervention, which is 
the set of activities conducted to achieve the results. Process variables often focus on the quality, access, or 
reach of a program. 
Qualitative Data. Qualitative data include virtually any type of information that cannot be captured in a numer-ical 
format. In social research, it most often refers to open-ended, in-depth interviews with individuals or 
focus group discussions, but can also include observations or the results of activities such as word associations 
or free listing. Qualitative data cannot be quantified, but lend insight to processes, feelings, and experiences. 
Quantitative Data. Data that are collected in a numerical, quantifiable way. Statistical methods of analysis can 
be applied. Quantitative data can be measurements, counts, ratings, scores, or classifications to which numer-ical 
values can be applied. 
Quasi-Experimental. In many field research situations, it is simply not possible or feasible to meet the random 
assignment criteria of a true experimental study design. Quasi-experimental studies do not meet the random-ization 
criteria, but are strong study designs that help the researchers to control some of the outside influ-ences 
that could interfere with the quality or accuracy of the data. Examples of quasi-experimental designs 
include time series studies, pretest-posttest with non-equivalent control groups, and separate sample pretest-posttest.
Randomized Control Trial. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a planned experiment designed to asses the 
efficacy of an intervention in human beings by comparing the intervention to a control condition. The alloca-tion 
to intervention or control is determined purely by chance through randomization. An RCT is the gold 
standard for determining causality in research. 
Regression Analysis. Regression analysis is a statistical method for describing a “response” or “outcome” vari-able 
as a simple function of “explanatory” or “predictor” variables. In a simple linear regression, one predic-tor 
variable is used to predict a response. In multiple linear regression, two or more predictor variables are 
used to predict the response. This allows for control of additional background characteristics. Logistic regres-sion 
analysis is used when the outcome is a binary or dichotomous variable. Logistic regression can be simple, 
using one predictor, or multiple, using two or more predictors. 
Sample Size. Number of clusters/households/individuals that a survey sets out to include, i.e. interview. The 
aim of sample size calculation is to have a large enough sample in each group to estimate a population mean 
or difference in means (or proportions) within a narrow interval. Statistical calculations can determine how 
large a study sample needs to be in order to have confidence in the results of the statistical analysis. 
Sex. Refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women. 
Statistically Significant. A result that tells us only that any observed difference between groups is unlikely to be 
due to chance. Statistical significance is usually measured at the 0.05 level, which means the observed differ-ence 
would occur by chance less than five percent of the time. 
Student’s T Test. This is a statistical hypothesis test that is used when the distribution of values in a population 
is assumed to be a normal distribution (bell curve) but the standard deviation is unknown. The Student’s T 
Test is a simple statistical tool that is frequently used to compare a mean (average) measure between two pop-ulations. 
Syndromic Management. This is one of several biomedical approaches to the treatment of sexually transmitted 
infections, or STIs. In syndromic management, a clinician (such as a nurse) bases treatment not on clinical 
tests for disease, but on the symptoms or effects that the individual is experiencing. Treatment is then offered 
for all diseases that could cause that symptom, or syndrome. In treating STIs, this enables clinicians to offer 
treatment faster than waiting for test results or in locations where clinical testing is unavailable. 
Transactional Sex. Sexual behavior that results in women or men receiving money or goods in exchange for sex; 
usually differentiated from commercial sex or prostitution. 
Triangulation. Using two or more methods or sources of data to investigate something. It is preferable that the 
methods and sources have different strengths and weaknesses so that the strengths of one can help counter-balance 
the weaknesses of the others. 
Validity. The degree to which a measurement or finding actually measures or detects what it is supposed to 
measure. Validity refers to the accuracy or truthfulness of a study’s conclusions. 
96 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
The Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG), 
established in 1997, is a network comprising non-governmental 
­organizations 
(NGOs), the United States Agency for International 
Development (USAID), cooperating agencies (CAs), and the USAID 
Bureau for Global Health (GH). The IGWG promotes gender equity with 
population, health, and nutrition (PHN) programs with the goal of 
improving reproductive health/HIV/AIDS outcomes and fostering 
­sustainable 
development. For more information, go to www. igwg.org. 
For additional copies contact: 
Population Reference Bureau 
1875 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 520 
Washington, DC 20009-5728 
www.prb.org 
phone: (202) 483-1100 
email: prborders@prb.org

More Related Content

PPTX
School-Aged Patients with Genetic Disorders
PDF
Understanding Health-care Providers’ Perspectives Toward Providing Contracept...
PDF
Access to hiv treatment and care amongst commercial sex workers in Malawi
PPTX
APCRSHR10 Virtual abstract presentation by Maria Persson
PDF
The Learning Health System: Democratizing Health Together
PDF
Respectful Maternity Care PECA
PPTX
Becoming a Learning Healthcare System
School-Aged Patients with Genetic Disorders
Understanding Health-care Providers’ Perspectives Toward Providing Contracept...
Access to hiv treatment and care amongst commercial sex workers in Malawi
APCRSHR10 Virtual abstract presentation by Maria Persson
The Learning Health System: Democratizing Health Together
Respectful Maternity Care PECA
Becoming a Learning Healthcare System

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Evidence Base for Using Technology Solutions in Behavioral Health Care
PDF
Understanding the Dynamics of Successful Health System Strengthening Interven...
PPTX
Transforming Gender Norms, Roles, and Power Dynamics to Reduce GBV: A Systema...
PDF
Community perspectives on task-shifting/ sharing: a multi-country survey to i...
PDF
Projects
PPT
Community nursing process
PPTX
Gender Analysis for Global Health_10.15.13
PDF
AASW final. 2013
PDF
Actors, policies, programs and activities of Family Planning in Sudan
DOCX
Survey_key_points-Care Coordination
PPTX
Asserting Rights of Childbearing Women_10.14.11
PDF
MPN Research Priorities
PPTX
MPN Workshop Jan 20, 2017
PDF
JAGS-0862-Final Oct 16 2014
PPTX
Evidence-Informed Public Health Decisions Made Easier: Take it one Step at a ...
PPTX
Health Equity Strategy into Public Health Action
PDF
Dissemination and Implementation Research - Getting Funded
PDF
Strengthen Dissemination, Implementation and Improvement Science
PPTX
8 pharmacy track pharmacists working with local coalitions and pdm ps
PPTX
APCRSHR10 Virtual abstract presentation of Jude Tayaben
Evidence Base for Using Technology Solutions in Behavioral Health Care
Understanding the Dynamics of Successful Health System Strengthening Interven...
Transforming Gender Norms, Roles, and Power Dynamics to Reduce GBV: A Systema...
Community perspectives on task-shifting/ sharing: a multi-country survey to i...
Projects
Community nursing process
Gender Analysis for Global Health_10.15.13
AASW final. 2013
Actors, policies, programs and activities of Family Planning in Sudan
Survey_key_points-Care Coordination
Asserting Rights of Childbearing Women_10.14.11
MPN Research Priorities
MPN Workshop Jan 20, 2017
JAGS-0862-Final Oct 16 2014
Evidence-Informed Public Health Decisions Made Easier: Take it one Step at a ...
Health Equity Strategy into Public Health Action
Dissemination and Implementation Research - Getting Funded
Strengthen Dissemination, Implementation and Improvement Science
8 pharmacy track pharmacists working with local coalitions and pdm ps
APCRSHR10 Virtual abstract presentation of Jude Tayaben
Ad

Viewers also liked (15)

PDF
Some evolving-trends-at-the-world-bank
PDF
A world-to-gain-en-1(2)
PDF
Ifc iga geothermal-exploration_best_practices-march2013
PDF
Africa q1 2014
PDF
Recent economic dvlp_sro_wa2012(1)
PDF
Hamilton and reaves sept 2014
PDF
South africa ifdi_-_may_8_2013_-_final
PDF
WOMEN IN THE ECONOMY: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE GREATER ACCESS TO TRADE E...
PDF
Banking sector skills_plan_2013-14
PDF
Rapport sem 2014_eng_vdef_29.07.14
PDF
Fao annual reportfinal feb2012
PDF
The Informal Economy: Definitions, Theories and Policies
PDF
Provincial economic review outlook 2012
PDF
Ar13 dev imp
PDF
Ifc sustainability +framework
Some evolving-trends-at-the-world-bank
A world-to-gain-en-1(2)
Ifc iga geothermal-exploration_best_practices-march2013
Africa q1 2014
Recent economic dvlp_sro_wa2012(1)
Hamilton and reaves sept 2014
South africa ifdi_-_may_8_2013_-_final
WOMEN IN THE ECONOMY: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE GREATER ACCESS TO TRADE E...
Banking sector skills_plan_2013-14
Rapport sem 2014_eng_vdef_29.07.14
Fao annual reportfinal feb2012
The Informal Economy: Definitions, Theories and Policies
Provincial economic review outlook 2012
Ar13 dev imp
Ifc sustainability +framework
Ad

Similar to Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence (20)

PPTX
Getting the G into M&E: Gender and Monitoring and Evaluation
PPTX
Gender perspectives of reproductive health
PPTX
Gender perspectives of reproductive health
POT
PDF
Addressing the Dual Epidemic of HIV and Gender-based Violence
PDF
Integrating ICTs in Gender-mainstreaming, Munyonyo _ Uganda
PPTX
MGS 827-CONCEPTS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH.pptx
PDF
A Conversation with Sita Shankar Wunnava on Digital Healthcare for Women, You...
PPTX
MA RESEARCH PRESENTATION
PDF
2016 Theme Guide
PPT
26PEPFAR-on-Resource-Mobilization-Final.ppt
PDF
Finding Women in Public Policy
PPT
26PEPFAR-on-Resource-Mobilization-Final.ppt
PPT
26PEPFAR-on-Resource-Mobilization-Final.ppt
PPT
Reproductive Health Issues in Asia and the Pacific: Old Challenges, New Strat...
PDF
Mdg 5b flyer
PPT
Gender issues&sustainable development(l 5)
PDF
Alessandra Liquori O'Neil
PPTX
Day 3 gender panel integrating suppy and demand tz 108023
PPTX
Most affected groups by Reproductive Health Problems
Getting the G into M&E: Gender and Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender perspectives of reproductive health
Gender perspectives of reproductive health
Addressing the Dual Epidemic of HIV and Gender-based Violence
Integrating ICTs in Gender-mainstreaming, Munyonyo _ Uganda
MGS 827-CONCEPTS OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH.pptx
A Conversation with Sita Shankar Wunnava on Digital Healthcare for Women, You...
MA RESEARCH PRESENTATION
2016 Theme Guide
26PEPFAR-on-Resource-Mobilization-Final.ppt
Finding Women in Public Policy
26PEPFAR-on-Resource-Mobilization-Final.ppt
26PEPFAR-on-Resource-Mobilization-Final.ppt
Reproductive Health Issues in Asia and the Pacific: Old Challenges, New Strat...
Mdg 5b flyer
Gender issues&sustainable development(l 5)
Alessandra Liquori O'Neil
Day 3 gender panel integrating suppy and demand tz 108023
Most affected groups by Reproductive Health Problems

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
An Introduction To National Savings CDNS.ppt
PPTX
Introduction to the NAP Process and NAP Global Network
PPTX
Key Points of 2025 ORAOHRA of the CSC from CSI
PDF
PPT Item # 7 - Proposed Budget and Tax Rate
PDF
The Landscape Catalogues of Catalonia. From landscape characterization to action
PPTX
Avoiding Suspensions and Disallowances in Audit.pptx
PPTX
IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES OF SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD PROGRAM -SLP MC 22 ORIENTAT...
PDF
Dean, Jodi: Concept Paper - Multi Family Lot
PPTX
I'M A PANCASILA STUDENT.pptx pendidikan pkn
PPTX
Political science uebenjejejjwnnwnwnwnwbwb
PDF
Global Intergenerational Week Impact Report
PDF
Driving Change with Compassion - The Source of Hope Foundation
PDF
Item # 1b - August 12, 2025 Special Meeting Minutes
PPTX
PPT for Meeting with CM 18.08.2025complete (1).pptx
PDF
Item # 8 - Staff Report on Pool Pocket Park
PPTX
Workshop introduction and objectives. SK.pptx
PDF
2024-Need-Assessment-Report-March-2025.pdf
PPTX
Community Contracting Protocol, DLG, MOHCA
PDF
Landscape quality objectives based on social perception. The experience of th...
PDF
Josh Bartch_ The Power of a Single Act of Giving.pdf
An Introduction To National Savings CDNS.ppt
Introduction to the NAP Process and NAP Global Network
Key Points of 2025 ORAOHRA of the CSC from CSI
PPT Item # 7 - Proposed Budget and Tax Rate
The Landscape Catalogues of Catalonia. From landscape characterization to action
Avoiding Suspensions and Disallowances in Audit.pptx
IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES OF SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD PROGRAM -SLP MC 22 ORIENTAT...
Dean, Jodi: Concept Paper - Multi Family Lot
I'M A PANCASILA STUDENT.pptx pendidikan pkn
Political science uebenjejejjwnnwnwnwnwbwb
Global Intergenerational Week Impact Report
Driving Change with Compassion - The Source of Hope Foundation
Item # 1b - August 12, 2025 Special Meeting Minutes
PPT for Meeting with CM 18.08.2025complete (1).pptx
Item # 8 - Staff Report on Pool Pocket Park
Workshop introduction and objectives. SK.pptx
2024-Need-Assessment-Report-March-2025.pdf
Community Contracting Protocol, DLG, MOHCA
Landscape quality objectives based on social perception. The experience of th...
Josh Bartch_ The Power of a Single Act of Giving.pdf

Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence

  • 1. Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: new evidence
  • 2. This publication was prepared with support from the BRIDGE Project (No. GPO-A-00-03-00004-00), funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and implemented by the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) on behalf of the Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG), a network comprising USAID Cooperating Agencies (CAs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the USAID Bureau for Global Health. The examples provided in this publication include experiences of organizations beyond USAID. This publication does not provide official USAID guidance but rather presents exam-ples of innovative approaches for integrating gender into reproductive health and HIV programs that may be helpful in responding to the Agency requirements for incorporating gender considerations in program planning. For official USAID guidance on gender considerations, readers should refer to USAID’s Automated Directive System (ADS). Copyright December 2009, Population Reference Bureau. All rights reserved.
  • 3. Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: new evidence By Elisabeth Rottach Sidney Ruth Schuler Academy for Educational Development Karen Hardee Population Action International December 2009 Prepared with support from the Interagency Gender Working Group, USAID, and Population Action International
  • 4. Acknowledgments This publication would not have been possible without the work of the original Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG) Task Force on Evidence that Gender Integration Makes a Difference to Reproductive Health Outcomes. The Task Force produced the 2004 “So What?” Report, whose authors included Carol Boender, Diana Santana, Diana Santillan, Margaret E. Greene, and two of the current authors, Karen Hardee and Sidney Schuler. Special thanks also to USAID’s Michal Avni and Patty Alleman, gender advisors in the Office of Population and Reproductive Health of the Global Health Bureau, for their support and commitment to this publication, and to Diana Prieto, gender advisor in USAID’s Office of HIV/AIDS for her invaluable review and suggestions. This publication also bene-fitted greatly from the comments of various external reviewers, including Dr. 'Peju Olukoya of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Department of Gender, Women, and Health. Thanks also to other reviewers from WHO, including: Shelly Abdool, Heli Bathija, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Isabelle de Zoysa, Elise Johansen, Claudia Morrissey, Annie Portella, and Kirsten Vogelson. The authors are grateful to Charlotte Feldman-Jacobs and Marissa Yeakey of the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) for their editing, support, and encouragement in moving this important resource to its successful end. Elisabeth Rottach, Sidney Schuler, and Karen Hardee ii Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 5. Table of Contents iii Table of Contents Executive Summary.................................................................................1 1. Introduction........................................................................................4 2. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies.....................................................12 Case Study: Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors....................................................................18 Case Study: PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program..............................................................................20 3. Improving Maternal Health................................................................22 Case Study: Involving Men in Maternity Care...............................25 Case Study: Social Mobilization or Government Services.............27 4. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs.....................................................30 Case Study: Tuelimishane (“Let’s Educate Each Other”)..............38 Case Study: Stepping Stones..........................................................40 Case Study: Program H..................................................................42 5. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health.............................44 Case Study: Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra........52 Case Study: Tostan Community-Based Education Program..........54 Case Study: Intervention with Microfinance for AIDS and Gender Equity (IMAGE)..........................................................56 6. Meeting the Needs of Youth...............................................................58 Case Study: Ishraq (“Enlightenment”)..........................................62 Case Study: First-time Parents.......................................................64 7. Conclusions......................................................................................66 Appendix ..............................................................................................70 References............................................................................................84 Glossary................................................................................................93
  • 6. iv Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 7. Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary In 2004, the Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG) published The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. The 2004 report presented evidence of the value of integrating gender into programs for promoting positive reproductive health (RH) and gender outcomes. The purpose of this new 2009 review is to assemble the latest data and update the evidence as to what difference it makes when a gender perspective is incorporat-ed into RH programs. The review focuses on five components of reproductive health programs, including inter-ventions related to: n Unintended pregnancy; n Maternal health; n HIV/AIDS and other STIs; n Harmful practices, including early marriage, female genital mutilation/cutting, and gen-der- based violence; and n Youth. The authors examined gender-related barri-ers to each component of reproductive health and the strategies undertaken by programs to address the barriers. Out of nearly 200 inter-ventions reviewed, 40 are included here as examples of programs that integrate gender to improve reproductive health outcomes. The interventions selected for inclusion were limited to those that have been evalu-ated— meaning they established criteria for assessment that were related to the goals of the intervention and followed an evaluation design—and that used accommodating or trans-formative approaches. The results of these pro-grams suggest that the field is evolving toward a deeper understanding of what gender equality entails and a stronger commitment to pursue this equality in reproductive health programs. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies Several of the projects to reduce unintended pregnancy countered the traditional practice of aiming family planning (FP) services at women only; they encouraged husbands and other males to take more responsibility in this area. The strategies included enlistment of men who hold power, such as community or religious leaders, to support FP; influencing husbands to encourage their wives to use FP services; and providing a male-controlled contraceptive method. Other projects encouraged joint deci-sionmaking, shared responsibility in FP, and the institutionalization of gender into RH ser-vices. Addressing the balance of power between health-care service providers and female cli-ents, quality of care initiatives aimed to sensi-tize providers about the role of gender in their practice. Many of these programs took place in set-tings where women have little autonomy in their daily lives and little assertiveness in their rela-tionships. By using a gender perspective, unin-tended pregnancy can be addressed not only through programs targeting women, but also by targeting men, leaders, and decisionmakers. Improving Maternal Health A common feature of all the projects to improve maternal health was their recognition that decisions about ante- and post-natal care typically are not made by young pregnant women and new mothers, but more often by husbands or mothers-in-law. Particularly suc-cessful gender transformative approaches sought to create a supportive environment to improve women’s use of services by reaching out to husbands and mothers-in-law, in addi-tion to women. Several projects reached out to couples through counseling and information.
  • 8. Through educational materials and couples’ counseling, health facilities broadened their reach to include husbands as well as pregnant women, addressing the particular roles that both partners can play in improving maternal health. Other projects aimed to improve the quality of antenatal care services and to change attitudes and practices among service providers with an emphasis on women’s rights to a basic standard of care and to be treated respectfully as clients. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs Evaluations of a number of interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS and STIs provide strong evi-dence that addressing gender norms, promoting policies and programs to extend equality in legal rights, and expanding services for women and men can result in improved HIV/AIDS and gender outcomes. Some of the interventions are designed for groups that are particularly vulnerable to HIV/STIs; some attempt to reach clients through reproductive health services, members of particular demographic groups, or those who are in need of care and treatment for HIV. A common feature of successful programs was to stimulate dialogue on the relationship between gender norms and sexual behavior. These messages were communicated through a variety of channels, such as peer groups, work-shops, or mass media. Some programs used peer educators to deliver the messages, while others used health professionals, HIV/AIDS spe-cialists, or spokespersons and celebrities. Another approach to addressing HIV/AIDS was to include a gender perspective in promoting the use of health services. Sensitizing service providers to the gender components of risky behaviors and health-care seeking patterns helped to improve quality of care. These interventions demonstrated that strategies that incorporate gender in order to reduce HIV/AIDS and other STIs are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their approach to addressing gender dynamics. Many programs also focused on helping men identify and begin to question their gender roles, both the advan-tages conferred to them and the risks to which these roles expose them. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health Harmful practices, including early marriage, early childbearing, female genital mutilation/ cutting, and gender-based violence, play a sub-stantial 2 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence role in undermining reproductive health, especially among young women. The harmful practices interventions reviewed were broad in focus, but shared common features. All employed gender transformative elements and sought to influence attitudes and behaviors of a range of community stakeholders, includ-ing women, men, parents, leaders, and entire communities. Linking social vulnerability and limited life options with vulnerability, life-skills education projects with unmarried adolescent girls aimed to increase their self-esteem and literacy. Interventions were often partnered with educa-tional modules on topics such as rights, prob-lem- solving, hygiene, and women’s health. Behavior change communication messages were disseminated through multiple channels, including community meetings, performances, and mass media activities. Meeting the Needs of Youth The interventions addressing youth focused on gender norms, providing information, and building skills related to sexual and reproduc-tive health (SRH). The themes of gender atti-tudes, partnerships, life skills, and participation of youth were common throughout many inter-ventions. Several sought to improve adolescent repro-ductive health by promoting gender equitable norms. The interventions themselves often com-prised life skills education and training, such as skills to provide opportunities for out-of-school youth. Other programs aimed to reach youth with RH information and services, empowering them to address their own needs. Some pro-grams sought support of communities for the activities, through village committees made up of a broad group of stakeholders. These commit-tees helped define and support the recruitment and program activities. Some used interven-tions at multiple community levels for policy, youth-friendly services, behavior change com-munication, and livelihood skills training.
  • 9. Conclusions In the past five years there has been a clear increase in the evidence that integrating gender does improve reproductive health outcomes. Today, women and men are reaping the bene-fits of gender-integrated programming that uses a gender-transformative approach and stronger evaluations are measuring the effects. This new review makes an important contribution to the growing body of literature on gender-based approaches to policy and programming. The evidence presented here suggests that incorpo-rating gender strategies contributes to reducing unintended pregnancy, improving maternal health, reducing HIV/AIDS and other STIs, eliminating harmful practices, and meeting the needs of youth – all broadly included under the term “reproductive health.” In addition, this report generated several new findings: n Gender-integrated strategies are stronger and better evaluated than they were five years ago; n Incorporating a gender strategy leads to a better understanding of RH issues; n Formative research is critical; n Programs that integrate gender can benefit from working at multiple levels; and n Projects that integrate gender need to focus on costs, scale-up, and identifying policy and systemic changes required to “main-stream” gender. The way forward, focusing on well-evaluated projects that address policy, systems, and cost issues, scaling up gender integration, and addressing sustainability of equitable gender relations over time, will make important contri-butions to the health and lives of women, men, and families around the world. Executive Summary 3
  • 10. 1Introduction International initiatives to achieve reproduc-tive health (RH) outcomes—such as reducing unintended pregnancy, stopping the spread of HIV/AIDS, and improving maternal health—are increasingly recognizing that these outcomes are affected by gender, or the roles that are commonly assumed to apply to women and men (see the gender definition in the box below). This includes the roles that affect inti-mate and sexual relationships. Governments worldwide are working to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, including Goal 3: to promote gender equality and empower women. Most international donor agencies have embraced the idea that RH poli-cies and programs should support women’s empowerment and gender equity, and have included this in their goals and strategies. For example, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long required that gender issues—both the potential effect of gender on proposed objectives and the impact of results on gender relations—be addressed within its projects, including health programs. USAID provides guidance on gender through its Automatic Directive System (ADS).1 Since 1997, the Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG), funded by USAID, has supported development of evidence-based materials and training for the implementation of programs that integrate gender into RH programs. The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which is a key component of the Global Health Initiative, has provided technical assistance and guidance for the integration of gender into HIV prevention, treatment, and care programs, including the implementation of five PEPFAR gender strategies.2 The United Nations (UN) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have encouraged “gender mainstreaming” for the last decade.3 The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria is developing a gender strategy that promotes increased attention to gender in country grants and within the organization itself.4 The World Bank adopted a gender and development mainstreaming strategy in 2001 and issued a revised Operational Policy and Bank Procedures statement in 2003.5 More recently, through the Gender Action Plan, it created a guiding framework to advance wom-en’s economic empowerment in order to pro-mote shared growth and MDG3.6 Many other bilateral and multilateral organizations also support policies and programs that promote gender equality. UNFPA’s State of the World Population 2008 Report states that “Gender equality is a human right. In all cultures there are pressures towards and against women’s empowerment and gender equality.” The 2008 report goes on 1 The ADS 200 and 300 series specify requirements for mandatory integration of gender considerations into plan-ning, 44 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence programs implementation, and evaluation. The latest version can be found at www.usaid.gov/policy/ads. 2 The five gender strategies include: 1) increasing gender equity; 2) addressing male norms and behavior; 3) reduc-ing violence and sexual coercion; 4) increasing income generation for women and girls; and 5) increasing women’s legal protection and property rights. 3 UN, 2002, 2008; WHO, 2002, 2007. 4 OSI and PAI are currently undertaking an analysis of evi-dence from gender programming to support implementa-tion of the Global Fund’s Gender Strategy. 5 World Bank, 2003. 6 World Bank, 2006. Gender refers to the different roles men and women play in society, and to the relative power they wield. While gender is expressed differently in different societies, in no society do men and women perform equal roles or hold equal positions of power. Riley, 1997: 1
  • 11. Are interventions more strongly focused on transforming inequitable gender relations? Are interventions that incorporate gender evaluated using more rigorous approaches? Introduction 5 to advocate culturally sensitive approaches in pursuing international development goals.7 Consistent with this perspective, the authors have based this IGWG report on the premise that RH policies and programs should support social and culturally competent approaches in favor of women’s empowerment and gender equality, as a contextual factor influencing mul-tiple RH outcomes, and in pursuit of advancing human rights. Many international organizations and gov-ernments have increasingly focused on results and impact of programs and have sought to make investments that rest on evidence that gendered approaches actually improve out-comes. Until 2004, when the IGWG published The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus Into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes, such evi-dence had not been brought together in a sys-tematic fashion. The purpose of this 2009 review is to assemble the latest data and update the evidence as to what difference it makes when a gender perspective is incorpo-rated into RH programs. Background The 2004 “So What?” report used the term “reproductive health” in its broadest sense, as defined at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), to cover interventions to reduce unintended preg-nancy and abortion; reduce maternal morbidity and mortality; and to combat the spread of STI/ HIV/AIDS. Interventions to improve quality of care were also assessed. Out of 400 interven-tions that were reviewed, 25 were found to have either accommodated gender differences or to have transformed gender norms to pro-mote equality. The report presented evidence of the value of integrating gender into pro-grams, for promoting both positive RH and gen-der outcomes. The report recommended: 1) stronger integration of gender in designing pro-gram interventions; and 2) more rigorous eval-uations of interventions that integrate gender.8 Objective The current review, also supported by the IGWG,9 looks at new projects and research findings with the objective of determining whether progress has been made in the inter-vening years both in gender and RH program-ming and in its evaluation. None of the interventions reviewed in the 2004 report are included here. In addition to assessing whether RH outcomes are enhanced with the integration of gender, the authors of this review explore the following two questions in this newer set of gendered programs: n Are the interventions more strongly focused on transforming inequitable gender relations rather than accommodating them? n Are interventions that incorporate gender evaluated using more rigorous approaches? Intended Audience This document is intended primarily for gender and health experts who design, implement, manage, and evaluate programs in developing countries. The findings on the effect of inte-grating gender are intended also for donors, policymakers, civil society, and advocacy groups to make the case for gender integration in health programs. Methods The authors identified documents for this review through online literature searches and by contacting key informants in the interna-tional reproductive health field. This report uses both published and unpublished docu-ments found in English, primarily evaluation reports, project summaries, and published jour- 7 UNFPA 2008. 8 Boender et al., 2004: 3. 9 Population Action International funded co-author Karen Hardee’s time for this review.
  • 12. nal articles. Databases of reproductive health, development, and academic literature were searched extensively.10 The authors also searched peer-review journals (e.g., Studies in Family Planning, Reproductive Health Matters, International Family Planning Perspectives, Population and Development Review, Violence Against Women, and The Lancet) and organization websites, such as Population Council, International Center for Research on Women (ICRW), the Interagency Youth Working Group, and the American Public Health Association (APHA). To extend the reach of the review beyond what is available online, experts and practitio-ners from organizations worldwide were con-tacted to locate additional program evaluation documents and identify other organizations and people involved in gender and reproductive health programs. Nearly 100 individuals span-ning 40 organizations were contacted to request information about relevant interven-tions or suggest additional key informants. After completing the literature search, the authors reviewed approximately 200 project documents that have been published since the year 2000. This year was selected as the start of the search range in order to capture the most recent publications and minimize overlap with the previous “So What?” review; search results were filtered to exclude any publications reviewed at that time. The documents cover a range of reproductive health interventions, cross-sectoral development and life skills pro-grams with reproductive health components, and pilot and operations research projects. Criteria for Inclusion in the Review Interventions selected for this update had to meet the following criteria:11 1. Does the intervention integrate gender? 2. Has the intervention been evaluated? 3. Does the intervention have measured repro-ductive health outcomes? Forty studies from developing countries were found to meet all three criteria.12 Only programs that used accommodating or transfor-mative approaches were included in this review. (See Appendix A.1 on page 71 for a table of the 40 projects, including their objec-tives, strategies, and reproductive health and gender outcomes.) Types of Gender Integration Strategies The IGWG has developed a continuum of the ways that gender is approached in projects (see Figure 1 below, the Gender Integration Continuum). This continuum13 categorizes approaches by how they treat gender norms and inequities in the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs or policy. The term “gender blind” refers to the absence of any proactive consideration of the larger gender environment and specific gender roles affecting program/policy beneficiaries. Gender blind programs/policies give no prior consideration for how gender norms and unequal power relations affect the achievement of objectives, or how objectives impact on gen-der. In contrast, “gender aware” programs/poli-cies deliberately examine and address the anticipated gender-related outcomes during both design and implementation. An important 10 The complete list of databases searched includes: POPLINE, the Development Experience Clearinghouse, Expanded Academic, Interagency Youth Working Group, HRH Global Resource Center, PubMed, and the WHO Reproductive Health Library. All databases were searched with equal rigor and the same set of search terms. 11 These are the same criteria that were used in the 2004 report. 12 A significant number of the final 40 projects were funded in whole or in part by USAID, who has also funded this review and publication. USAID projects frequently require evidence of program impact through structured evalua-tions. 6 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence As a result, many USAID programs met the evalua-tion requirements for inclusion in this review as they were able to demonstrate the impact of their gender programs. 13 This framework draws from a range of efforts that have used a continuum of approaches to understanding gender, especially as they relate to HIV/AIDS. See Geeta Rao Gupta, “Gender, Sexuality and HIV/AIDS: The What, The Why and The How” (Plenary Address at the XIII International AIDS Conference), Durban, South Africa: 2000; Geeta Rao Gupta, Daniel Whelan, and Keera Allendorf, “Integrating Gender into HIV/AIDS Programs: Review Paper for Expert Consultation, 3–5 June 2002,” Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002; and WHO/ ICRW, “Guidelines for Integrating Gender into HIV/AIDS Programmes,” forthcoming.
  • 13. FIGURE 1.1. The Gender Integration Continuum14 prerequisite for all gender-integrated interven-tions is to be gender aware. In the graphic above, the circle depicts a specific program environment. Since programs are expected to take gender into consideration, the term “gender aware” is enclosed in an unbroken line, while the “gender blind” box is defined by a dotted, weak line. Awareness of the gender context is often a result of a pre-program/ policy gender analysis. “Gender aware” contexts allow program staff to con-sciously address gender constraints and oppor-tunities, and plan their gender objectives. Programs/policies may have multiple compo-nents that fall at various points along the con-tinuum, which is why multiple arrows exist. The IGWG emphasizes the following two gender integration principles: n First, under no circumstances should pro-grams/ policies adopt an exploitative approach since one of the fundamental principles of development is to “do no harm.” n Second, the overall objective of gender integration is to move toward gender trans-formative programs/policies, thus gradually challenging existing gender inequities and promoting positive changes in gender roles, norms, and power dynamics. Gender exploitative approaches, on the left of the continuum, take advantage of rigid gen-der norms and existing imbalances in power to achieve the health program objectives. While using a gender exploitative approach may seem expeditious in the short run, it is unlikely to be sustainable and can, in the long run, result in harmful consequences and undermine the pro-gram’s intended objective. Gender accommodating approaches, in the middle of the continuum, acknowledge the role of gender norms and inequities and seek to develop actions that adjust to and often com-pensate for them. While such projects do not actively seek to change the norms and inequi-ties, they strive to limit any harmful impact on gender relations. A gender accommodating approach may be considered a missed opportu-nity because it does not deliberately contribute to increased gender equity, nor does it address the underlying structures and norms that per-petuate gender inequities. In situations where gender inequities are deeply entrenched and pervasive in a society, however, gender accom-modating approaches often provide a sensible first step to gender integration. As unequal power dynamics and rigid gender norms are Introduction 7 14 While this gender continuum framework has been adopted by the IGWG and applied to USAID’s work, other organiza-tions may use different gender frameworks; see, for exam-ple, the World Health Organization gender strategy at http://www.who.int/gender/mainstreaming/strategy/en/ index.html
  • 14. recognized and addressed through programs, a gradual shift toward challenging such inequities may take place. Gender transformative approaches, at the right end of the continuum, actively strive to examine, question, and change rigid gender norms and imbalance of power as a means of reaching health as well as gender-equity objec-tives. Gender transformative approaches encourage critical awareness among men and women of gender roles and norms; promote the position of women; challenge the distribution of resources and allocation of duties between men and women; and/or address the power relationships between women and others in the community, such as service providers or tradi-tional leaders. [T]he field is evolving toward a deeper understanding of what gender equality entails and a stronger commitment to pursue this equality in health programs. A particular project may not fall neatly under one type of approach, and may include, for example, both accommodating and transfor-mative elements. Also, while the continuum focuses on gender integration goals in the design/planning phase, it can also be used to monitor and evaluate gender and health out-comes, with the understanding that sometimes programs result in unintended consequences. For instance, an accommodating approach may contribute to a transformative outcome, even if that was not the explicit objective. Conversely, a transformative approach may produce a reac-tion that, at least temporarily, exacerbates gen-der inequities. Monitoring and evaluating gender outcomes against the continuum allows for revision of interventions where needed. Accommodating or Transformative? In some cases a particular intervention strategy may be accommodating in one context and transformative in another, depending on the nature of the intervention and how it is imple-mented. For example, a project may work with male power holders such as local religious lead-ers to try to enlist them in encouraging (or to stop opposing) contraceptive use among women. This could be seen as an accommoda-tion to the gender status quo in which males holding power act as gatekeepers. It could also be seen as transformative if the leaders are explicitly engaged to question or change their traditional role in regard to family planning communication. Transformative strategies may experience greater challenges to implementation in that they explicitly address the structural underpin-nings of gender inequality in social systems, and therefore are likely to encounter resis-tance. For the same reason, however, they have the potential to bring about long-term and more sustainable benefits for women and men. Programs and policies may transform gen-der relations through: n Encouraging critical awareness of gender roles and norms; n Empowering women and/or engaging men, thus achieving gender equality and health equity objectives; or n Examining, questioning, and changing the imbalance of power, distribution of resourc-es, and allocation of duties between women and men. A majority of the interventions in this review employ transformative approaches. This suggests that the field is evolving toward a deeper understanding of what gender equality entails and a stronger commitment to pursuing equality in health programs. 8 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 15. Intervention Evaluations The interventions selected for inclusion in this report were limited to those that have been evaluated – those that established criteria for assessment that were related to the goals of the intervention and followed an evaluation design. The evaluations are of varying quality and thor-oughness, employing methods ranging from randomized-control trials (RCT) to post-test-only designs, a few of which used qualitative methods exclusively (see Table 1.1).15 Countries Represented Twenty-five countries were represented in the interventions to improve reproductive health outcomes by integrating gender. Most interven-tions were located in Africa (10), followed by Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean (6 each), the Near East (2) and Other (1). Some countries had multiple interventions. Two countries, India and South Africa, were home to the most interventions (eight and seven interventions, respectively). Reproductive Health Outcomes The outcomes highlighted in this report cover a range of indices in reproductive health and family planning, as well as broader indicators such as age at marriage and knowledge about sexual and reproductive health, as well as indi-cators of gender outcomes (see Tables 1.3 and 1.4). The authors have limited this review to programs with measured reproductive health outcomes, although broader indicators and gen-der outcomes are included when available. Organization of the Report This report is divided into seven chapters: an introduction; four chapters corresponding to reproductive health issues (unintended preg-nancies; maternal health; HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs); and harmful practices); a chapter on meeting the needs of youth (due to the large number of pro-grams targeted to this vulnerable and demo-graphically important group, as well as the Table 1.1 Table 1.2 special strategies needed to reach youth); and, finally, a conclusion. Each chapter contains at least two detailed case studies, highlighting particularly noteworthy projects with strong evaluations and transformative approaches. Noteworthy projects that had less information available were included in the summary within each chapter. Of the 40 programs that met the criteria for inclusion, 18 are cross-cutting interventions, addressing two or more RH issues. In these cases, the programs are categorized in the chapter on the RH issue they most directly address. In addition, many of the interventions included in this report related to working with Introduction 9 15 See the Glossary, page 93, for definitions of evaluation and research methodology terms. Methodologies Used in Evaluation of Gender Integrated Interventions Methodology Number of studies Quantitative (primarily) 37 Experimental design 5 Quasi-experimental design 17 Non-experimental design 15 Qualitative (exclusively) 3 Countries Included in the Analysis of Outcomes Related to Gender-integrated Interventions Africa (10) Asia (6) LAC (6) Near East (2) Other (1) Ethiopia (3) Afghanistan Bolivia Egypt (2) Georgia Ghana Bangladesh Brazil Jordan Guinea Cambodia Ecuador Kenya (2) India (8) El Salvador Liberia Nepal Nicaragua South Africa (7) Philippines Peru Tanzania (2) Senegal Sudan Uganda Note: some programs and evaluations were conducted in multiple countries. Some programs were implemented in multiple countries without all countries being included in the evaluations. Only countries that had evaluations are included in this table.
  • 16. Table 1.3 Number of Interventions Reporting Selected* Reproductive Health Outcomes** Reproductive Health Issue Outcomes Number of Interventions Reducing Unintended Pregnancy Greater contraceptive knowledge 11 Greater contraceptive use 11 Greater awareness of fertility 2 Increase in communication and joint decision-making with partner about contraception 2 Improved provider clinical skills and knowledge of FP methods and STI detection/treatment 1 Improving Maternal Health Increase in use of skilled pregnancy care 3 Reduced case fatality rate 1 Increase in screening of pregnant women for Syphilis 1 Increase in women’s emergency obstetric care needs being met 1 Greater knowledge of warnings signs in pregnancy 1 Increase in awareness of prenatal care 1 Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs Greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and prevention 7 Greater condom use: At last sex 3 With primary partner 4 Increase in visits to centers that provide HIV/AIDS and STI services 5 Lower reported STI symptoms 2 Greater knowledge of STI symptoms 1 Increased exclusive breastfeeding 1 Greater receipt & ingestion of nevirapine 1 Greater CD4 testing 1 Eliminating Harmful Practices Decrease in belief that IPV/SV is justified under some circumstances 3 Greater knowledge of IPV/SV resources 2 Decrease in incidence of violence 3 Increased community action and protest against harmful practices 2 Attitudes toward IPV/SV 4 Decrease in risk of IPV/SV 1 Decrease in controlling behavior by intimate partner 1 Increased uptake of RH services 1 Greater knowledge of harmful consequences of FGM/C and advantages of not cutting girls 3 Decrease in belief that FGM/C is necessary 2 Increase in number of men who marry uncircumcised girls 1 Decrease in FGM/C incidence 2 Increase in age at marriage 1 Increase in interval between marriage and first birth 1 Greater knowledge of risks of early childbearing 1 Fewer adolescent pregnancies 1 Fewer adolescent marriages 1 Meeting the Needs of Youth Greater sexual and reproductive health knowledge 4 Increase in decision-making ability related to: Condom use 2 Sex 1 Increase in age at sexual debut 1 *Additional RH outcomes were measured beyond those listed here. Please see the program reports for additional information. **Interventions addressing more than one reproductive health outcome are listed more than once. 10 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 17. Introduction 11 men. These interventions are included under each of the main chapters because the construc-tive engagement of men and boys is an integral part of integrating gender into programs. Each chapter begins with a summary of the issues surrounding the reproductive health out-come discussed in the section. Next, summa-ries of interventions and studies are presented, highlighting each project’s gender approach as well as evaluation design. At the end of each chapter, readers will find expanded case studies that highlight selected interventions, including their gender integration strategies and evalua-tions. Information on costs has been included where available. Some of the program areas had more intervention examples than others and the amount of detail on each of the meth-odologies and approaches of the interventions is limited by the quality of description found in reports and communications. The 2004 “So What?” report, reflecting the state of the field at the time, did not have sepa-rate chapters on harmful practices or youth. Interventions in these areas certainly existed, but most had not been evaluated, or had not been evaluated extensively enough to be included in the review. Also, the 2004 report had a separate chapter on gender in quality of care initiatives. Quality of care has increasingly been incorporated as a standard component of RH programming; therefore, quality of care ini-tiatives are not highlighted separately here. Table 1.4 Number of Interventions Reporting Selected* Gender Outcomes** Gender Outcomes Number of Interventions Increased partner communication about reproductive health or family planning 11 Increased equitable gender attitudes and beliefs 9 Women's increased self-confidence, self-esteem or self-determination 5 Women's increased participation in the community and development of social networks 3 Higher scores on an empowerment scale for women 3 Increased support (emotional, instrumental, family planning, or general support) from partners or community 2 Increased life and social skills 2 Women's increased decision-making power 1 Higher formal educational participation for women or girls 1 Women's increased mobility 1 Improved gender relations within the community 1 Women more articulate in discussing IPV/SV and RH 1 Decreased tolerance for kidnapping of girls 1 *Additional gender outcomes were measured beyond those listed here. Please see the program reports for additional information. **Interventions addressing more than one gender outcome are listed more than once.
  • 18. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies Unintended pregnancy is a critical issue throughout the world. Data from 53 coun-tries indicate that one in seven married and one in 13 never-married women have an unmet need for contraception16 and are thus at risk of unintended pregnancy. Unmet need is highest in sub-Saharan Africa, where one in four mar-ried women have an unmet need for contracep-tion. In the regions of Latin America and the Caribbean, North Africa, West and Central Asia, and South and Southeast Asia, unmet need is lower, but still significant.17 Numerous gender-related barriers that con-tribute to unintended pregnancy have been identified, some at the institutional and policy level, and others at the levels of the family and community. Fertility control has often been seen as women’s domain, and women are often construed as targets of family planning (FP) programs rather than beneficiaries of reproduc-tive health care. As a result, programs have been slow to engage men and address gender-based inequities. Men’s power over women in the household also has implications for contra-ceptive use and reducing unintended pregnan-cies. Women are often in a weak position in negotiating the timing and circumstances of sexual intercourse.18 The perception that women are responsible for FP may mean that women without their own sources of income are unable to use family planning services unless they are free of charge.19 Women are often blamed for unplanned pregnancies20 even though men often play important roles in regu-lating 2 12 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence women’s access to RH services through control of finances, women’s mobility, means of transportation, and health care decisions.21 Women in some settings would rather undergo abortions than risk repeated conflicts with their husbands over contraceptive use.22 Women are disadvantaged by unequal power relations outside the home as well as within it. Gender power imbalances in client-provider relationships often are exacerbated by dispari-ties in social status and education, which are likely to be greater when the client is female and the provider is male.23 This may encourage providers to behave in an authoritarian fashion that often results in compliance and passivity from their clients.24 Regardless of the sex of the provider, female clients often fail to ask ques-tions or voice concerns that may affect the suc-cess of their family planning use.25 Additionally, gender norms may discourage 16 Women who prefer to space or limit births but are not using any form of contraception are considered to have unmet need for family planning. 17 Sedgh et al., 2007. Based on data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). 18 Schuler et al., 1994. 19 Schuler et al., 2002b. 20 Hoang et al., 2002. 21 Robey et al., 1998; Goldberg and Toros, 1994. 22 Biddlecom and Fapohunda, 1998; Schuler et al., 1994. 23 Upadhyay, 2001. 24 DiMatteo, 1994; Schuler et al., 1994. 25 Schuler et al., 1985; Schuler and Hossain, 1998. Program Country Male Motivation Campaign Guinea Together for a Happy Family Jordan Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning El Salvador Reproductive Health Awareness Philippines PRACHAR India REWARD Nepal CASE STUDY: Women’s Empowerment Model to Afghanistan Train Midwives and Doctors CASE STUDY: PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Bolivia Reproductive Health Program
  • 19. Table 2.1 Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 13 women, especially young women, from appear-ing to know or acquiring knowledge about sex-ual matters or suggesting contraceptive use.26 At the same time, the social construction of masculinity may contribute to male risk–taking in the form of unprotected sex and expecta-tions to prove sexual potency.27 Interventions Several of the projects reviewed both for this chapter and for the chapter on maternal mor-tality and morbidity countered the traditional practice of aiming FP services at women only; they encouraged husbands and other males to take more responsibility in this area. The strat-egies included enlistment of people who hold power—for example, religious leaders and, in one case, the royal family—to support FP; influencing husbands to encourage their wives to use FP services; and providing a male-con-trolled contraceptive method. Other projects encouraged joint decisionmaking and shared responsibility in FP and the institutionalization of gender into RH services. The two projects selected as case studies reduce unintended pregnancy through a gen-der- transformative approach. They are the Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors and the PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program (see pp. x and x). The Women’s Empowerment Model was used to train mid-wives and doctors on clinical skills in family planning, particularly IUD insertion, and to increase family planning knowledge in Afghanistan. The PROCOSI gender-sensitive program adopted a long-term perspective and worked with a large number of institutions in Bolivia to integrate gender into reproductive health services. Of the other six interventions that met the criteria for this review, the first four described here aimed to meet the RH goal of reducing unintended pregnancy through constructive engagement of men. Their approaches range from accommodating to transformative, and sometimes encompass elements of both. Table 2.1 lists the key gender strategies used to reduce unintended pregnancy in the projects reviewed. Male Motivation Campaign28 Country: Guinea Implementing organizations: Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs (JHU/CCP) and the Guinean Ministry of Health Through constructive engagement of men, this intervention sought to increase knowledge and use of quality health care services and the adoption of positive health practices in Guinea. The first phase of this campaign consisted of advocacy with religious leaders—a strategy that falls somewhere between gender accommodat-ing and transformative. In the context of a patrilineal and male-dominated society in Guinea, the program accommodated existing power structures by reaching out to male reli-gious leaders, knowing that empowering reli-gious leaders would help to ensure social support for family planning. In the second phase, the project utilized multimedia interven-tions to educate married men about FP and persuade them to talk with their wives and encourage them to use FP services. Engaging community men and those in positions of lead-ership has the potential to transform gender relations to a greater equity by expanding lim- 26 Bezmalinovic et al., 1997; Population Council, 2000. 27 UNFPA, 2008. 28 Blake and Babalola, 2002. Strategies Used in Programs to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy Improving male partners’ accurate knowledge about RH and FP; and Encouraging male partners to take more responsibility for FP Encouraging joint decision-making and shared responsibility for FP Institutionalization of gender into NGO RH services, including accreditation Advocacy with religious leaders and policymakers Integration with non-health development activities (water and sanitation) Use of established male networks to diffuse information, refer to services, and expand method choice Empowering female providers Increasing gender awareness and sensitivity of health providers Empowering women and girls
  • 20. ited traditional male roles to include knowledge of, and engagement in, FP/RH. In addition to the two primary audiences, the campaign also addressed women of reproductive age and ser-vice providers. The project covered a relatively large population; for example, about 30,000 people attended community mobilization events surrounding 30 rural health centers. The evaluation of the Male Motivation Campaign in Guinea had two components: a panel study with religious leaders and a popula-tion- based study with men and women of reproductive age. In the first component, 98 religious leaders were interviewed at two points in time. In the second component, a sample of 1,045 men and women who were interviewed in the 1999 Guinea Demographic and Health Survey were re-interviewed. Following the intervention, involvement in advocating for modern family planning methods became more widespread among religious leaders and fewer believed that FP methods were prohibited by Islam. Multiple regression analysis controlling for confounding effects of prior ideation showed that campaign exposure was associated with considerable and significant change in an “ide-ation index” measuring awareness of and approval of FP; discussion of FP with spouse, friends, or relatives; and spousal approval of FP. Actual use of contraception, however, did not increase significantly among women and stag-nated among men. Together for a Happy Family29 Country: Jordan Implementing organizations: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs (JHU/CCP) in collaboration with the Jordanian National Population Committee This project engaged men by encouraging cou-ple communication and joint decision-making. The project worked with religious leaders and the royal family in Jordan, where many people were unaware that Islam permits use of modern FP methods. In Jordan, husbands’ opposition to family planning, preferences for large families, perceived religious prohibitions, and health concerns all limit the use of modern FP meth-ods. For a two-year period beginning in March 1998, national-level, multi-media behavior change communication messages were used to enlist men in making informed decisions with their wives to use family planning. The premise of the project was that highly-respected people would be able to influence men effectively. Project researchers, with staff from the Jordanian Department of Statistics, compared the project’s 1996 knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) survey results with findings from the 2001 Men’s Involvement in Reproductive Health Survey (MIRHS) following the campaign. The analysis showed improved knowledge and substantially more positive atti-tudes 14 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence among both men and women regarding specific modern FP methods. The majority of both men and women reported in 2001 that they decided together on the number of chil-dren they planned to have, compared with about one-third who said they decided together in 1996. Similarly, in 2001 nearly 80 percent of MIRHS respondents said that husbands and wives share responsibility for avoiding unwanted pregnancies. Survey respondents were given a list of topics from which they were to rank issues discussed and actions taken as a result of exposure to the campaign. Respondents ranked discussing issues with spouses and sharing decision-making as the top actions taken. They also included treating sons and daughters equitably and adopting a FP method. Comparison of the 1996 and 2001 sur-veys showed a decrease in ideal family size from 4.3 to 3.8. While it is not possible to attri-bute these changes entirely to the “Together for a Happy Family” campaign, the magnitude of the changes is notable. Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 30 Country: El Salvador (rural) Implementing organizations: The Institute for Reproductive Health (IRH) of Georgetown University, the El Salvadoran Ministry of Health, and Project Concern International, with its local El Salvador affiliate PROCOSAL (Programas Comunitarias para El Salvador) This was a pilot project carried out in 13 small villages in rural El Salvador. The objective was to integrate family planning—specifically increasing male involvement in family planning 29 JHUCCP, 2003. 30 Lundgren et al., 2005.
  • 21. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 15 and use—into a water and sanitation program. It sought to facilitate couple communication and joint decision-making regarding family planning. The initiative also aimed to integrate women into water committees which had previ-ously been monopolized by men. Results of interviews with men and women defined as having unmet need indicated that some men were unwilling to use modern contraceptive methods, or to have their wives use them, both because of concern about side effects and because they worried that their wives might be unfaithful. The researchers found that the prac-tice of periodic abstinence was common, but that most people could not correctly identify their fertile days.31 The project sought to use networks established around issues men cared about and in which they were already involved. These networks were used to diffuse informa-tion, facilitate referrals, and expand method choice (with an emphasis on the Standard Days Method™ or SDM). The project creatively used a metaphor to promote family planning: fertile cycles of the land were equated with the fertile cycles of women. Moreover, the incorporation of men into FP decisionmaking was construed as a natural parallel to including women in decisionmaking in development efforts. Thus, gender-equity strategies from a project in the environmental sector were imported into a FP initiative, furthering the objective of reducing unintended pregnancy as well as promoting gender equality. The evaluation of this project employed community-based surveys of individuals of reproductive age prior to the start (January 2001) and at the end of the project (September 2002). Logistic regression analyses showed sub-stantial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior after the FP intervention. Communication between partners also increased. The differences between participants and non-participants were small, suggesting a community-level effect. The researchers attri-bute the program’s success to the way the intervention was integrated into an already successful water and sanitation project equipped with its own outreach infrastructure for involving many men and women in the community.32 Reproductive Health Awareness (RHA)33 Country: Philippines Implementing organizations: KAANIB in the Philippines; evaluation conducted in collaboration with FRONTIERS/ Population Council, the Institute for Reproductive Health (IRH, Georgetown University), and the Research Institute for Mindanao Culture (RIMCU at Xavier University). In this male engagement intervention, KAANIB worked with small farmers and agrarian reform beneficiaries and implemented the RHA inter-vention through its trained volunteer couple members. The RHA project sought to promote constructive engagement of men in reproduc-tive health by improving awareness, knowledge, health-seeking behavior, and couples communi-cation on RH. The project used a couples approach, but emphasized husbands’ needs and involvement in RH. The volunteer couples were trained on four topics: fertility and body aware-ness; family planning; RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS; and couples communication on RH. These top-ics had been identified as gaps in knowledge during a 1997 baseline survey of male involve-ment conducted by the FRONTIERS Project and IRH/Georgetown. The evaluation included a pre- and post-test nonequivalent control group design. At pre-test (prior to the RHA intervention), 210 couples who were members of KAANIB and 249 couples from the comparison areas were interviewed. At post-test, 183 of the original 210 couples in KAANIB areas were found and interviewed, as well as 217 couples in the comparison areas. In the intervention area, significant positive changes were found in supportive attitudes by husbands toward RH, and in husband-wife communication, as reported by husbands and their partners. Knowledge and awareness about anatomy and physiology, fertility, family plan-ning methods, and STI increased significantly among women but not among men. No changes were found in family planning use. Statistically significant improvements were found among men in the program area regarding communi-cation with spouses on the fertile period and use of family planning. The intervention dem-onstrated the feasibility of using couples as RH educators in the community. 31 Lundgren et al., 2005. 32 Lundgren et al., 2005. 33 Palabrica-Costello, 2001.
  • 22. PRACHAR34 Country: India Implementing organizations: Pathfinder International with 30 local NGOs in Bihar, India. The PRACHAR project aimed to raise aware-ness about FP and the healthy timing and spac-ing of pregnancy among young people and community leaders. The project worked with married and unmarried young people, both male and female, as well as with mothers-in-law and other family members of young couples and respected community elders and commu-nity leaders. The three-year project that began in 200135 worked in 452 villages and provided information on RH/FP issues to over 90,000 adolescents and young adults and over 100,000 parents and other adults in the communities. Educational messages regarding the risks and disadvantages of early marriage and childbear-ing, and the benefits of delaying and spacing births, were tailored for these different audi-ences. The project also provided contraceptives and worked with community-based practitio-ners to increase their skills in providing basic maternal and child health and RH/FP services. The transformative approach focused on empowering girls and women, increasing men’s knowledge and sensitization to FP, and on open communication between partners on issues related to childbearing, family size, and use of contraception. The PRACHAR project’s evalua-tion relied on project monitoring data and pre-/ post surveys in intervention and control areas to assess impact. Key RH results included: n The percentage of the population (all respondents) who said they believed that contraception is both necessary and safe increased from 38 percent to 81 percent. Among unmarried adolescents, this figure increased from 45 percent to 91 percent. n The percentage of recently married couples using contraceptives to delay their first child more than tripled, from five percent to 20 percent, and the interval between mar-riage 16 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence and first birth increased from 21 months to 24 months. n The percentage of recently married contra-ceptive adopters who began using contra-ception within the first three months of the consummation of marriage increased dra-matically, from less than one percent to 21 percent. n The percentage of first-time parents who used contraception to space their second child increased from 14 percent to 33 percent. 34 Information from Wilder et al.. 2005. See also, E.E. Daniel et al., 2008. 35 This section relates to data from Phases I and II of the PRACHAR project. As this publication goes to press, the project is currently in Phase III.
  • 23. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 17 REWARD36 Country: Nepal Implementing organizations: The Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA), The Nepal Red Cross Society (NRCS), and the Centre for Research on Environmental Health and Population Activities (CREHPA). The NRCS, in collaboration with CREHPA, implemented the REWARD (Reaching and Enabling Women to Act on Reproductive Health Decisions) Project to strengthen wom-en's capabilities for informed decisionmaking to prevent unintended pregnancy and improve reproductive health in three districts of Nepal. The project worked with Village Development Committees and supported a network of more than 700 community-based staff and volunteers engaged in delivering reproductive health infor-mation and methods (pills, condoms, and Depo-Provera) at the community level. It aimed both to provide services and referrals and to create an enabling environment to strengthen women's informed RH decisionmaking. Two components of this strategy were educational sessions to increase gender awareness among program managers and service providers, and encouragement of women’s participation at all levels of the NRCS. The project also created women-only community action groups (CAGs) that met monthly to discuss reproductive health issues. At the program’s peak, there were 495 active CAGs with nearly 10,000 members. After the REWARD project in Nepal was phased out in 2002, CEDPA conducted an eval-uation that included two components: 1) an assessment of project performance based on secondary data; and 2) a population-based sam-ple survey in one district (security concerns prevented a more extensive survey). Comparison of baseline and endline data sug-gested increases in contraceptive prevalence and “couple years of protection” (CYP); increased popularity of reversible contracep-tives such as DMPA, condoms, and pills; and increased use of maternal and child care ser-vices during the course of the project. 36 CEDPA, 2004; and CREHPA, 2002.
  • 24. REDUCING UNINTENDED PREGANCIES CASE STUDY Intervention: Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors Country: Afghanistan Type of Intervention: Health provider training Implementing Organizations: Family Health Alliance (FHA) Gender-Related Barriers to RH Women in Afghanistan are among the least empowered groups in the world. Afghan women often lack agency to make the most basic decisions, including those regarding reproductive health and family planning. Additionally, the country has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world.37 This is a direct result of the patriar-chal structures prevalent across Afghanistan, and the ensuing constraints placed on women’s lives. The restrictions limit women’s educational and economic opportunities, as well as their access to reproductive health care. In addition, years of conflict and instability have devastated Afghanistan’s health care facilities and health professional capacities, further impacting women’s health. Objective This intervention (implemented 2005 – 2007) sought to address maternal mortality in Afghanistan by preventing unwanted pregnancies and promoting birth spacing through the expansion of family planning services. Strategy FHA sought to improve RH outcomes by training female midwives and doctors using the Women’s Empowerment Model. This training program focused on clinical skills in family planning, particularly IUD inser-tion, and increasing family planning knowl-edge. The project sought to reduce infections, enhance detection and treatment of STIs, and improve their approach in edu-cating clients in HIV/AIDS/STI prevention. FHA trained 47 female family planning ser-vice providers from more than 10 prov-inces. The rationale for using a women’s empowerment approach was that this model would lead to increased communica-tion and changes in gender norms and decision-making power. Additionally, empowered women health providers could become more valued members of the healthcare system and be better able to meet their clients’ healthcare needs. The program used five empowerment strategies: 1. Role modeling. The project recruited pro-fessional Muslim women trainers from Iran. 2. Developing critical thinking skills. Trainers focused on the status of Afghan women and compared them with other women in the region. 3. Individual consultations. The project encouraged one-on-one meetings between trainers and trainees to discuss barriers to trainees completing the program (e.g. obtaining husbands’ permission). 4. Fostering teamwork and personal responsibility. Trainees were involved in problem-solving tasks during the program. 5. Overcoming fatalism. The project pro-moted women as agents of change and a culture of “it can be done.” Evaluation Design: Single sample pretest-posttest The program was evaluated using pre- and post-tests of trainees’ knowledge and clini-cal skills. Reproductive Health Outcomes Findings showed a significant increase, from 53 percent to 89 percent, in trainee knowledge of family planning methods, counseling strategies, and STIs and HIV/ AIDS. Clinical skills tests showed an aver-age score of 86 percent in the areas of infection prevention procedures, correct use of medical instruments, counseling strategies, IUD insertion and removal, and detection and treatment of STIs. Gender Outcomes Results showed that trainees demonstrated increased understanding of the importance of applying women's empowerment strate- 1188 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 37 UNICEF and CDC, 2002.
  • 25. Figure 2.1 Results of Clinical Assessment: Kabul and Mazar Combined n=47 Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 19 gies when interacting with their family plan-ning clients. Limitations While this intervention demonstrated the improvements in healthcare providers’ skills that can happen when careful attention is paid to the cultural barriers that they face, this was also a missed opportunity for understanding how gender integration affects gender outcomes in addition to health outcomes. An evaluation design that included, for example, a woman’s empower-ment scale to measure gender attitudes, would have been a complement to the knowledge and clinical assessments, provid-ing richer data and a clearer understanding of the empowerment process. Conclusions The results indicate that a women’s empow-erment training model can effectively help female health providers to develop high lev-els of competency in clinical skills and greater knowledge of family planning meth-ods, counseling strategies, and STIs and HIV/AIDS. Trainees also developed a greater appreciation of women’s empowerment strategies that could be used with family planning clients. 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 References Family Health Alliance. Clinical Family Planning/ Reproductive Health Training Program in Afghanistan, 2007. Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.familyhealthal-liance. org/programs.php. Taraneh R. Salke, Lessons from the Field: Using a Women's Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors in Afghanistan. Presentation at 2007 APHA Conference. Washington, DC: FHA, 2007. 0 75% or Below 76-80% 81-85% 86-90% 91-95% 96-100% Number of People Percent Correct Note: Results indicate percent of questions answered correctly after health provider trainings. Source: T. R. Salke, 2007.
  • 26. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies Case Study Intervention: PROCOSI Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program Country: Bolivia Type of Intervention: Reproductive health service delivery Implementing Organizations: PROCOSI (Programa de Coordinación en Salud Integral) Cost: Average cost of intervention only: $23,148 Gender-Related Barriers to RH Bolivia has a long history of discrimination against women, evident in many national health and well-being indicators where women suffer from higher rates of poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, domestic violence, and lower rates of political participation. Healthcare clinics often overlook the inequi-ties between women’s and men’s lives, including power, decision-making capacity, and access to resources, as well as varying communication patterns. These inequities limit women’s ability to access and use reproductive health services. Objective The objective of this project was to assess the effects and cost of incorporating a gender per-spective into existing RH service programs. Strategy PROCOSI is a network of 24 Bolivian NGOs that coordinates and implements health pro-grams throughout the country. The “Incorporating Gender Program” was imple-mented from 2001 – 2003 by 17 of the PROCOSI partner NGOs. First, all PROCOSI organizations were invited to participate in the program. Next, PROCOSI adapted a framework developed by International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF)38 to operationalize a gender perspective. The framework evaluated seven organizational areas through 71 indicators. The organiza-tional areas included: institutional policies and practices; practices of providers; client satisfaction; client comfort; use of gendered language; information, communication and training; and monitoring and evaluation. PROCOSI trained evaluation teams from each of the 17 organizations. The teams completed baseline evaluations and analyzed the results. Each team then partici-pated in two workshops to decide which areas the organization should improve upon. An action plan was developed for each selected indicator and then imple-mented over a 15-month period. All partici-pating organizations received a package of Married, Non-Pregnant Women With Unmet Family Planning Needs SURVEY Unmet need for: Pre (N=707) Post (N=830) Limiting with desire to use* 10.6 7.1 Spacing with desire to use* 6.1 3.8 Limiting and spacing* 25.5 20.8 Limiting and spacing with desire to use* 16.7 10.9 * Significant statistical difference between periods with a confidence level of 95 percent Source: E. Palenque, et al., Effects and Costs of Implementing a Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program, 2004. print materials and videos related to gender, reproductive health, and family planning for distribution to clients and providers. Evaluation Design: Mixed-methods, pretest-posttest Household surveys of health service users and their partners were administered pre-and post-intervention. Nine organizations from the participating 17 were initially selected, from which 10 clinics were chosen for evaluation. IPPF provided technical assistance to conduct the baseline and end-line studies. The evaluation included: 1) exit interviews with clients after their visits to the clinics, before and after the gender interventions; 2) follow-up interviews with the same women in their households three months after the exit interviews; 3) a survey with a sample of the women’s partners; 4) analysis of service statistics; 5) a cost anal-ysis to estimate the costs of incorporating a gender perspective into service delivery; and 6) monthly visits to each clinic to qualita-tively assess changes in the organization. Student’s T and Chi square tests were used to test significance. Reproductive Health Outcomes Results showed significant decreases in unmet need for family planning when all sites were aggregated. Unmet need for teta-nus vaccination among pregnant women 20 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence % % and for contraceptive services among non-pregnant women were used as proxy indica-tors to assess the impact of the interventions on users’ health. There were no significant changes in meeting unmet needs related to tetanus vaccines for preg-nant women. There were significant changes in out-comes related to quality of care, including more comfortable interactions with the health provider and changes in provider practices, such as mentioning SRH issues. There was a significant increase in the pro-portion of women who reported that provid-ers asked them questions or gave them specific information to actively explore their health needs, on topics such as cervical or breast cancer, STIs/HIV/AIDS, sexuality, and domestic and sexual violence. There were also significant increases in screening for FP needs. The proportion of women screened on the above topics, however, remained below half at endline. Gender Outcomes The evaluation measured changes in partner communication, couple decisionmaking, and attitudes toward gender roles and gender-based violence. Findings showed modest changes. There were no significant changes 38 IPPF, Manual to Evaluate Quality of Care from a Gender Perspective, 2000. Table 2.2
  • 27. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies 21 Table 2.3 Table 2.4 with regard to women’s perceptions of their partners’ attempts to control them; however, there was a significant decrease in the pro-portion of men who said they always decided what their partner had to do, for-bade her from wearing certain kinds of clothes, and did not allow her to speak in social gatherings. In both surveys, but particularly at end-line, the majority of women said they could speak easily to their husbands regarding FP methods, when to have children, sexual relations, STIs, and family health. With regard to perceptions of gender roles, significant changes in women’s responses toward more gender-equitable views were found in two indicators: it is not correct for a woman to initiate sexual relations, and women’s work should be mainly at home. One indicator—women’s work should be mainly in the home—was significant for men. The proportion of women who believed that there are circumstances in which men have the right to beat their partners decreased significantly from 4.4 to 1.8 per-cent. No significant changes were found among men. Replication As a follow-up to the above intervention, in 2005 FRONTIERS collaborated with PROCOSI to test the feasibility and costs of a certification system for verifying that its member organizations provided gender-sen-sitive reproductive health services. Service-delivery facilities were required to comply with 80 percent of 65 pre-established stan-dards on quality of care and gender. The categories included institutional policies and practices, provider practices, personnel knowledge of reproductive health, client comfort, use of gendered language, infor-mation, education, communication and training, client satisfaction, and monitoring and evaluation. The certification process was imple-mented in three steps: an initial diagnostic assessment; development and implementa-tion of workplans; and finally an external evaluation to issue the two-year certification. The initial diagnostic assessment showed that the NGO facilities complied with an aver-age of 14 percent of the gender- and quality-related standards. At the endline assessment, the facilities met 94 percent of the standards. Average costs for improvements across the seven facilities were lower than the case study intervention, averaging $4,004, compared to $23,148. Excluding staff time, the average cost was $2,039, with the majority of expenses due to meet-ings, workshops, and infrastructure improvements in the three facilities that required infrastructure changes. Limitations The high cost of the intervention poses a considerable challenge to replicating or scal-ing up this intervention. As the follow-on project by FRONTIERS and PROCOSI dem-onstrated, a more cost-effective approach to operationalizing a gender perspective may be to develop a certification system with teams from the NGOs implementing all training activities, infrastructure changes, procedures, and revisions of statutes with their own resources. Under this approach, 14 out of 15 organizations were able to meet 80 percent of the standards, costing, on average, $19,144 less than the incorpo-rating gender program. Conclusions PROCOSI'S gender program produced a number of positive RH outcomes, including a decrease in unmet need for contraception, improved client satisfaction and quality of care, increased staff awareness of SRH, and positive changes in behavior among male and female staff. The intervention produced moderate but important gender outcomes, including women’s increased confidence in their capacity to discuss SRH and awareness of their rights to use contraceptive methods. Among partners, a decrease in tolerance of gender-based violence was found. References E. Palenque, L. Monano, R. Vernon, F. Gonzales, P. Riveros, and J. Bratt. Effects and Costs of Implementing a Gender- Sensitive Reproductive Health Program. Frontiers Final Report. (Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004). E. Palenque, P. Riveros Hamel, and R. Vernon. Consolidating a Gender Perspective in the PROCOSI Network. Frontiers Final Report. (Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007). Women’s Perceptions of Characteristics of Their Interaction with Health Providers (significant outcomes) Variable Pre-survey (%) Post-survey (%) N= 1,060 N= 1,062 Felt uncomfortable during the interaction 8.3 5.8 Called by her name 72.7 86.8 Provider used visual aids in his/her interactions 16.8 32.6 Provider informed her she had right to ask questions 20.3 47.8 Had time to ask questions 77.8 83.3 Asked questions 73.6 80.1 Source: Palenque et al., 2004. Affirmative Answers on Variables Related to Gender Roles Variable Pre-survey (%) Post-survey (%) Women It is not correct for a woman to initiate sexual relations 56.3% 52.0% Women’s work should be mainly in the home 46.0% 27.5% In certain circumstances men have the right to beat their partner 4.4% 1.8% Men Women’s work should be mainly in the home 42.5% 28.3%
  • 28. Improving Maternal Health According to the 2006 Lancet Maternal Survival Series, “The risk of a woman dying as a result of pregnancy or childbirth during her lifetime is about one in six in the poorest parts of the world, compared with about one in 30,000 in Northern Europe.”39 This disparity highlights the enormous difficulty of meeting the fifth Millennium Development Goal—reducing maternal mortality by 75 percent between 1990 and 2015. Most maternal deaths occur during labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum period, with the main medical cause of maternal deaths being obstetric hemorrhage. The social, economic, and political causes are many and include gender inequality.40 Gender-related barriers amplify the physiologi-cal dangers associated with motherhood. For example, women’s lack of decision-making power may deny them access to health care and negatively affect maternal health out-comes. 41 Women’s limited access to education can impede their understanding of basic health care concepts such as danger signs in preg-nancy. In many settings, women’s limited mobility outside the home may make them uncomfortable in institutional settings, such as clinics and hospitals, and interfere with their communication with health care providers. Men are often the primary wage earners; as a result, their health may be valued more than women’s,42 and families may be reluctant to use resources for pregnancy-related care. Pregnant women may be reluctant to consume extra calories or seek care when danger signs arise,43 or may be scolded by husbands or mothers-in-law for doing so.44 Men are often primary decisionmakers about their wives’ health care, yet they are often ignorant about their wives’ health before, after, and even dur-ing labor and delivery.45 In some societies, gender norms require that women demonstrate their strength by suf-fering 3 22 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence through labor and childbirth with little or no assistance.46 Physicians and other obstet-ric service providers may discourage or forbid family members from being present or provid-ing support during labor47 despite the many studies that have demonstrated the beneficial impact of labor companions on clinical out-comes. 48 These types of gender-related barriers to maternal health come from the personal, family, and community levels, and together cre-ate significant barriers to women’s ability to access services. 39 Ronsmans and Graham, 2006; accessed online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.womendeliver.org/pdf/Maternal_Lancet_ series.pdf 40 Sen, Ostlin, and George, 2007. 41 See Atkinson and Farias, 1995; Nachbar, 1997; Vissandjee et al., 1997; World Health Organization, 1995; Roth and Mbizvo, 2001. 42 Schuler et al., 2002. 43 Hoang et al., 2002. 44 Raju and Leonard, 2000. 45 Raju and Leonard, 2000. 46 Bradby, 1999; Sargent, 1998. 47 Jessop et al., 2000: 54; Boender et al., 2004:32. 48 Zhang et al., 1996; Hodnett, 2001; Sosa et al., 1980. Program Country FEMME Project Peru Men in Maternity Project India CASE STUDY: South Africa Involving Men in Maternity Care CASE STUDY: India Social Mobilization or Government Services
  • 29. Strategies Used in Programs to Improve Maternal Health Improving use of MH services by improving accurate RH knowledge and changing attitudes of mothers-in-law, husbands Testing models to encourage husbands’ participation in wives’ antenatal and postpartum care Providing couples counseling and information and encouraging men to attend services Training health providers to understand women’s right to basic standard of care IImmpprroovviinngg MMaatteerrnnaall HHeeaalltthh 2233 Interventions Four projects met the review’s criteria and incorporated gender approaches in interven-tions to reduce maternal mortality and morbid-ity (see table. 3.1 for gender strategies). Of these four, two were chosen as case studies because of their successful gender transforma-tive approaches (see pages 25 and 27). The Social Mobilization or Government Services Project in India sought to create a supportive environment to improve women’s use of ser-vices by reaching out to husbands and moth-ers- in-law, in addition to women. In South Africa, the Involving Men in Maternity Care Project followed two broad strategies: improv-ing antenatal care services and reaching out to couples through counseling and information. A common feature of all four projects was their recognition that decisions about ante- and postnatal care typically are not made by young pregnant women and new mothers, but more often by husbands or mothers-in-law. These projects, therefore, focus on men or older women as well as young women. The strategy of involving men in maternity care may be seen as either gender-accommodating, in building on men’s roles as gatekeepers, or gender-transfor-mative insofar as it encourages men to expand their traditional gender roles. These projects also sought to change atti-tudes and practices among service providers, drawing on some of the longstanding work developed under earlier quality of care initia-tives. This emphasis on women’s rights to a basic standard of care, and to be treated respectfully as clients, makes some of the proj-ects transformative, since inequitable gender norms typically deprive women of rights. FEMME Project (Foundations for Enhancing Management of Maternal Emergencies)49 Country: Peru Implementing organizations: CARE/Peru; the Peruvian Ministry of Health; Columbia University This project was implemented in a region of Peru’s Southern Highlands. The technical com-ponent of the FEMME Project aimed at improv-ing clinical quality of care in obstetric emergencies through standardized handling of clinical cases using a new set of emergency obstetric care guidelines. The project combined this intervention with a rights component stressing women’s rights to decent and humane care, and including information for patients, privacy during care, and an emphasis on respect for local customs and beliefs. Of the four projects reviewed in this sec-tion, the FEMME project had the most exten-sive evaluation. It used a quasi-experimental study design with a non-equivalent control group, incorporated both quantitative and qual-itative methods of data collection, and mea- 23 Table 3.1 49 CARE, 2007.
  • 30. sured health outcomes rather than process variables only. The evaluation covered five intervention and five control health facilities. The study found that the FEMME approach was well accepted among health personnel (doctors, obstetricians, and nurses). The evaluation results show markedly higher scores in the intervention facilities in the correct use of clin-ical obstetric protocols, dramatic increases in the treatment of obstetric complications, and a reduction of over 80 percent in case fatalities. The maternal mortality rate declined by 49 percent in the intervention facilities, compared with a 25 percent decline in the comparison group. The total cost of the FEMME Project was approximately US$750,000, including the years of intervention as well as administrative closure and documentation activities (2000-2006). Men in Maternity Project (MiM)50 Country: India Implementing organizations: The Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) and the Population Council. This project tested a model that encouraged husbands’ participation in their wives’ antena-tal and postpartum care. Addressing the fact that many women depend on men for access to healthcare, further complicated by socio-cul-tural norms on appropriate sexual behavior for men and women, the interventions included: 1) individual or group counseling sessions for men and women separately, in the antenatal clinic; 2) couples’ counseling sessions during antena-tal and postnatal clinics; 3) screening of all pregnant women for syphilis; and 4) syndromic management of men reporting urethral dis-charge and men and women reporting genital ulcers. The MiM project used a non-equivalent con-trol group study design to examine the effects of the intervention. Three of 34 ESIC dispensa-ries in Delhi with the highest antenatal clinic attendance that also had laboratory facilities were selected as intervention sites and three as control sites. Concerning FP/RH outcomes, the study found improved knowledge of FP among both men and women and improved knowledge of pregnancy danger signs among women but not men, and no improvements in STI knowl-edge 24 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence or condom use. There was a significant increase in screening of pregnant women for syphilis with the establishment of a universal syphilis screening program. As for gender outcomes, husbands’ involve-ment was significantly higher in the interven-tion group during antenatal consultation, family planning consultation, postpartum visit, and presence during labor and delivery. Communication between spouses increased in the postpartum period on baby’s health, breast-feeding, and family planning issues, but com-munication on STIs was low and did not significantly increase. More women from the intervention group compared to the control group reported making joint decisions on fam-ily health and family planning issues. Improvements were also documented in client-provider interaction and satisfaction. 50 Varkey et al., 2004.
  • 31. Improving Maternal Health Case Study Intervention: Involving Men in Maternity Care Country: South Africa Type of Intervention: ANC and postpartum care program Implementing Organizations: Reproductive Health Research Unity (RHRU), University of the Witwatersrand, FRONTIERS, KwaZulu Natal Department of Health cost: Total cost of intervention only = $97,552; Cost per clinic = $16,258 Improving Maternal Health 25 Gender-Related Barriers to RH In the traditional Zulu community where this intervention took place, family plan-ning has been predominately the woman’s responsibility. Men, however, are often the primary household authority, controlling income and expenditures and granting per-mission for their partner to seek health care. It is usually the male partner who decides which contraceptive method, if any, will be used. These gender roles impact a woman’s reproductive health decisionmaking abilities and communica-tion with her partner. These roles also limit men’s understanding of RH and MH, and their participation as supportive and engaged partners. The contradiction between women’s expected responsibilities and limited agency, coupled with norms indicating that men are the sole decision-makers in a household, can negatively affect reproductive health outcomes. Objective The main goal of the intervention was to design and test an expanded antenatal and postpartum care program to improve women’s and men’s reproductive health by increasing the use of postpartum family planning and protective behaviors for STIs and HIV/AIDS. The intervention (imple-mented from 2000 – 2003) sought to encourage men’s participation in their part-ners’ maternity care by adjusting services to welcome men and encourage couples’ counseling. Strategy Two clinic-based strategies were used. The first strategy, improving existing antenatal care services, included information, educa-tion, and communication through dissemi-nation of an information leaflet and an antenatal booklet for couples. The second strategy, couples’ counseling, trained health providers on constructive engage-ment of men and invited partners of women to attend counseling during and post pregnancy. Formative research was carried out to inform the intervention, including: a facility-based analysis; a case study on syphilis screening and management in antenatal cli-ents; client flow analysis and a time motion study of how providers spent their time; focus group discussions; and record reviews. To ensure program support, several meetings were held with key stakeholders, including Department of Health officials at local, provincial, and national levels; clinic managers; and health care providers. Several technical working groups developed information, education, and communication materials and in-service training modules, and made recommendations for creating a couple-friendly environment. Two trainings were held, one for all clinic and support staff and a second for 65 professional nurses working in the interven-tion clinics. Topics in this second training included pregnancy, preparation for delivery, postnatal care, involving men in maternity, sexual health, basic counseling, quality improvement, and infection control. Each clinic developed its own plan regarding how to schedule couple counsel-ing. Invitation letters were sent encouraging men’s participation in the counseling ses-sions (two letters during antenatal care and one post-delivery) and attendance certifi-cates were given to men who attended counseling sessions during work hours to present to their employers. Nurses facili-tated the interactive group couple-counsel-ing sessions, which covered antenatal care procedures, physiological and emotional changes, pregnancy danger signs and care seeking, delivery plan, post-delivery care for mother and baby, STI and HIV/AIDS preven-tion and management, family planning, and infant feeding. Evaluation Design: Cluster randomized-controlled trial The study design was a cluster random-ized- controlled trial with six clinics imple-menting the intervention and six control clinics continuing to provide services as normal. Individual interviews were col-lected to evaluate the program. Baseline interviews (995 respondents in the inter-vention group and 1081 in the control group) were collected prior to the women’s first antenatal appointment. Follow-up interviews were conducted six months post-delivery (follow-up rate: 68 percent for women and 80 percent for men). Focus group discussions were conducted with health providers at intervention clinics to evaluate their satisfaction with the inter-vention activities. Cost data were collected on the costs of planning, implementing, and monitoring the intervention. Reproductive Health Outcomes In emergency situations, a significantly higher proportion of men in the intervention group assisted their partners compared to men in the control group. Significantly more couples in the intervention continued on next page
  • 32. group discussed topics related to STIs, sexual relations, immunization, and breast-feeding. Among women exposed to counseling and the booklet, the intervention signifi-cantly improved the knowledge of condoms for dual protection; no similar improvement was seen in their male partners. Compared to those in the control group, women in the intervention group were significantly more likely to be assisted by their partners when experiencing prob-lems during pregnancy. There were no sig-nificant differences in knowledge of obstetric danger signs or in the following indicators: use of contraception or methods at six months postpartum, STI and HIV/ AIDS knowledge and risk behavior, syphilis testing and management, and breastfeeding practices. Gender Outcomes As mentioned above, communication among the couples improved and couples were more likely to discuss such topics as STIs and sexual relations. Limitations The intervention failed to achieve significant outcomes on some of the indicators. One explanation for this may be that the evalua-tion results under-represent the project’s impact due to possible contamination effects in service delivery. The same super-visors and managers were responsible for both the intervention and control clinics, and may have unknowingly changed ser-vices at the control clinics because of their experience at the intervention clinics. Clinic statistics were used to match clinics and randomly assign them to the Issues Discussed by Matched Couples topics discussed control Couples % intervention couples % treatment groups. Clinic records were not always accurate, however, and some could not achieve the expected numbers of partici-pants. This meant that some clinics had too few participants to be included in statistical comparisons. A number of project and research design components could have been improved to address the overall low levels of significance. Programming could have been enhanced by extending the interven-tion period or including mass communica-tion strategies, and the research design could have been strengthened by reducing chances for contamination. Conclusions The intervention successfully demonstrated that male participation in this context is fea-sible. That one-third of couples attended the counseling is notable, given that this was a new concept in a community where there was negligible male participation in mater-nity care and most couples were not cohabi-tating. Other men expressed willingness to participate, but were unable due to work schedules, lack of permission from employ-ers, or not being told about the counseling by their female partners. The evaluation provided evidence that the intervention was effective in significantly changing couple communication and part-ner assistance during emergency situations and improving knowledge of condoms as a dual protection method. References B. Kunene, M. Beksinska, S. Zondi, N. Mthembu, S. Mullick, E. Ottolenghi, I. Kleinschmidt, S. Adamchak, B. Janowitz, and C. Cuthbertson, Involving Men in Maternity Care: South Africa. Frontiers, Final Report (Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004). 2266 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence (n=528) (n=588) STI 64 75* Sexual relation 75 81* Family planning 70 77 Whether to have more children 49 54 Immunization 75 81* Breastfeeding 83 87* Baby's health 71 78 * p<0.05 Source: Frontiers. Table 3.2
  • 33. Improving Maternal Health Case Study Intervention: Social Mobilization or Government Services Country: India Type of Intervention: Community-based mobilization and government RH services Implementing Organizations: Foundation for Research in Health Systems (FRHS), ICRW Cost: Total cost of implementation and evaluation: $93,248. (Social mobilization – 42%; Government services – 18%; Research and administration – 40%.) Improving Maternal Health 27 Gender-Related Barriers to RH Rates of adolescent marriage and early child-bearing in India are among the highest in South Asia. Sexual and reproductive health education is a taboo subject for unmarried girls and so young women who enter into marriage are likely to be uninformed about issues such as contraception, pregnancy, STIs, and disease prevention. After marriage, gender restrictions and social norms (includ-ing limited mobility and decisionmaking), in addition to an unsupportive environment for young women’s reproductive health, may prevent young women from accessing RH care and family planning services. Mothers-in- law often play a significant role in their daughters-in-law’s lives and control their health-seeking behavior. Objective This study, implemented from 2001 – 2006, examined the relative effectiveness of addressing supply versus demand con-straints to improve RH for young married women. Strategy The intervention targeted newly married couples in two comparable neighborhoods of Ahmednagar district in Maharashtra. Social mobilization and government health service improvement strategies were used to address the demand and supply con-straints, respectively. The strategies were developed in response to formative research carried out from 1996–1999 as part of a larger program that identified constraints to women’s reproductive health. The social mobilization strategy was implemented through existing community-based organizations and in collaboration with youth and women’s groups. These groups served as interactive health educa-tion sessions for married adolescent girls. Young girls’ husbands participated in male group forums. FRHS anticipated that engag-ing male youth groups and women’s groups would encourage husbands and mothers-in-law to participate in and support young women’s reproductive health-seeking, thereby creating a more supportive environ-ment. Two FRHS social workers and two members from the government’s district training center organized the social mobili-zation activities. The government health service improvement strategy was implemented in partnership with the government health sys-tem and focused on training local health officials. Government health providers were also sensitized to adolescents’ health needs and trained on how to provide couple coun-seling to married adolescent girls and their husbands. Evaluation Design: 4-Cell experimental design Four interventions were each implemented in one primary health center (PHC) area: One PHC had only social mobilization strate-gies; a second focused only on improving government health services; a third had both strategies concurrently (SM+GS); and a fourth, the control area, received neither. The interventions and control PHC were assigned randomly. Across the four PHCs, 22 sub-center villages were encompassed. FRHS conducted a baseline survey of 1,866 married girls and women ages 16-22 years across the study villages, collecting data on adolescent girls’ health needs and constraints; health-seeking patterns; and experiences and perceptions of quality of care for a number of reproductive health outcomes. Similar surveys were completed at the midpoint (N=2,100) and endline (N=2,359). Mid-intervention, 972 husbands of young women were surveyed to collect data on their knowledge of, and involvement in, their wives’ health-seeking. Similarly, 75 mothers-in-law were interviewed at mid-point to assess their attitudes toward their daughters-in-law. Reproductive Health Outcomes Of the four study arms, the two arms that included social mobilization strategies saw the greatest improvement in reproductive health outcomes. The social mobilization area was most effective in improving women’s knowledge of maternal health, contraceptive side effects, and abortion, and increasing behaviors related to postnatal check-ups, contraceptive use, treatment of gynecological disorders, and partner treatment of reproduc-tive tract infections and STIs. The SM+GS site saw the greatest increase in basic awareness of reproductive health and infertility. One explanation for this outcome may be that a new female doctor who took a special interest in these issues began work-ing in this site in the middle of the interven-tion. The government services-only site did not see significant improvements in most outcomes. Gender Outcomes Qualitative interviews with mothers-in-law indicated that the social mobilization inter-vention contributed to an increase in sup-portive attitudes toward daughters-in-law’s health-care seeking. Surveys of husbands at mid-point showed that most had gained an awareness
  • 34. of basic maternal care issues and were will-ing to seek treatment for problems during pregnancy and childbirth. Limitations Due to the popularity of the health educa-tion sessions, representatives in the control arm began implementing their own health education sessions. Therefore, some con-tamination of the research design may have Percent Change from Baseline to Endline, By Strategy Need for full ANC 66.1 18.5 -3.4 50.2 Need for PNC 129.5 43.5 24.6 81.7 Spacing FP methods 14.4 14.1 12.4 9.7 Had PNC check-ups 40.5 -17.8 2.9 2.9 High-risk delivery care 4.7 4.2 29.8 24.4 Treatment-RTI symptoms 49.5 44.8 98.2 26.7 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence occurred. Although husbands’ data showed increased awareness and willingness to seek maternal care for their wives, only a minority of husbands actually accompanied wives to the health care centers. This may be partly because social norms and health centers, which offer minimal privacy, dis-courage male participation. Conclusions This study illustrates the effectiveness of social mobilization in increasing young mar-ried women’s knowledge of RH, increasing use of RH services, and changing social norms and attitudes of mothers-in-law toward their daughters-in-law’s RH. The research team expected the com-bination arm to generate the best outcomes, by addressing both the demand and supply constraints of women’s health-seeking. The SM-only arm, however, performed better for many outcomes; having a more focused and concentrated intervention may be one explanation for this. The project’s work with mothers-in-law and husbands showed some success as well. The evaluators found the inroads with husbands to be especially notable because maternal care in this society typically is regarded as a “woman’s issue.” Efforts should continue to be made to encourage male participation in their wives’ maternal care. SM GS SM + GS Ctrl References International Center for Research on Women, “Social Mobilization or Government Services: What Influences Married Adolescents’ Reproductive Health in Rural Maharashtra, India?” in Briefing Kit, Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in India (Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006). R. Pande, K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. MacQuarrie, and S. Jain, “Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in India: Evidence of Effectiveness and Costs from Community-Based Interventions” (Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006). Source: ICRW, 2006. 28 Table 3.3
  • 36. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs Much has been written about the effect of gender on the HIV/AIDS pandemic.51 Gender contributes to the epidemic by increas-ing vulnerability to the virus and exacerbating the impact of living with HIV and AIDS. Gender norms affect both women’s and men’s sexual behavior and ability to protect against HIV/AIDS. When gender norms, cus-toms, and laws relegate women to a lower sta-tus than men it makes women particularly vulnerable to HIV. In a review of Ghana’s response to HIV/AIDS, the authors write that “[g]ender issues are at the core of the Ghanaian – and sub-Saharan – epidemic” and add that the epidemic is “basically fueled by sexual behavior and women often have little or no decision-making power in sexual rela-tions.” 52 Worldwide, almost half of the people living with HIV or AIDS are women; in sub- Saharan Africa, 61 percent of those living with HIV or AIDS are women.53 Gender norms pertaining to men—norms that prescribe roles such as early, risky sex with multiple partners—also puts them at increased risk.54 Moreover, men may be reluc-tant to seek medical information and services for HIV and AIDS, because of gender norms that portray health-seeking behavior as weak and non-masculine. Failure to access such ser-vices 30 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence negatively impacts both men and their partners. A UNAIDS report notes that in many coun-tries women are “receiving more than expected coverage for antiretroviral therapy,” and that additional research is needed to explore the rea-sons for the imbalance. In one study of antiret-roviral treatment (ART) centers in 13 countries that included over 33,000 individuals, 60 per-cent of the patients on treatment were women. Noting masculine roles that present barriers for men accessing treatment, the study concluded that, “More attention needs to be paid to ensur-ing that HIV-infected men are seeking care and starting HAART [Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy].”55 It is important to assess whether or not treatment coverage mirrors patterns of infection to determine if any groups are facing unequal access to services. Economic realities can also compound gen-der inequality and power relations as a risk fac-tor for HIV/AIDS and a barrier to treatment. While women are generally resilient and play key roles in the fight against HIV/AIDS, women are also less likely to have access to resources and more likely to depend on men for financial survival for themselves and their children. Women, particularly young women, have a range of motivations for seeking out multiple Program Country Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales Nicaragua Men as Partners South Africa Yaari Dosti India Play Safe Cambodia Mothers2Mothers Program South Africa Integration of RH Services for Men Bangladesh in Health & Family Welfare Centers Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health Services Ecuador CASE STUDY: Tuelimishane Tanzania CASE STUDY: Stepping Stones South Africa CASE STUDY: Program H Brazil 51 See UNIFEM, Gender and AIDS Web Portal, 2009. 52 Antwi and Oppong, 2003, p.6. 53 UNAIDS, 2007. 54 UNAIDS, 2007. 55 Britstein et al., 2008, p. 48. 4
  • 37. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 31 partners, and operate on a continuum of voli-tion56 that often makes it difficult to negotiate safer sex, regardless of their motivation. For many women, having more than one partner and engaging in cross-generational and transac-tional sex are economic survival strategies to support themselves and their dependents.57 Moreover, the economic disadvantage of women in many societies leads to a lack of sexual negotiation power. Women’s need for economic support from husbands or partners—particu-larly if they have children—can lead women to remain silent on matters of sex and fidelity in relationships that confer some level of eco-nomic security. The fear of economic abandon-ment by husbands or partners may be greater when extramarital relationships are explicit, resulting in an increased powerlessness to negotiate safe sex just when the risks of STI transmission are the highest.58 In some countries, HIV-positive women (and men) face employment discrimination because of their HIV status. For example, some employers require HIV testing as a condition of employment, while others have abused the employment rights of workers who test posi-tive. 59 Legal frameworks that insure nondis-crimination on the basis of sex can empower women. Conversely, inequality under the law, for example with regard to property and inheri-tance rights, can increase women’s vulnerabil-ity to HIV/AIDS. For many women, loss of a husband to HIV/AIDS is followed by loss of property and land, exacerbating the impact of the disease and limiting their ability to protect themselves and their families.60 Interventions Evaluations of a number of interventions in this chapter provide strong evidence that address-ing gender norms, promoting policies and pro-grams to extend equality in legal rights, and expanding services for women and men can result in improved HIV/AIDS and gender out-comes. It should be noted that the outcomes identified in these projects are intermediary outcomes such as knowledge, risk perceptions and behavior change such as increased condom use. These outcomes are routinely measured in behavioral surveys that constitute second-gen-eration surveillance, and are considered for-bearers to reductions in HIV incidence. Measuring reductions in HIV incidence would require longer-term interventions and evalua-tions than would be possible with the projects included in this review. The evaluations show that changing gender norms requires long-term interventions. As aptly noted by Mozambique’s former Prime Minister, Pascoal Mocumbi, “To change funda-mentally how girls and boys learn to relate to each other and how men treat girls and women is slow, painstaking work. But surely our chil-dren’s lives are worth the effort.”61 Of the 10 interventions reviewed in this chapter, six undertook gender transformative approaches and four focused primarily on accommodating gender differences. Among the gender transformative interventions, six addressed gender norms related to HIV and AIDS. Three projects were selected as case studies: Tuelimishane, Stepping Stones, and Program H. Tuelimishane in Tanzania is a community-based HIV and anti-violence pro-gram for young men in Dar es Salaam that combined community-based drama and peer education.62 The interventions for young men were designed around three themes that emerged from formative research, namely, infi-delity, sexual communication, and conflict. Stepping Stones, originally designed to address the HIV epidemic in Uganda in the mid-1990s, is now among the most widely used prevention interventions around the world, having been used in over 40 countries.63 Program H in Brazil was developed on the premise that gen-der norms, which are passed on by families, peers, and institutions, and are interpreted and internalized by individuals, can be changed. The 10 interventions indicate that strategies to reduce HIV/AIDS and other STIs that incor-porate gender are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their approach to addressing gender dynamics. Gender integration in HIV and other STI prevention projects is primarily 3311 56 Weissman et al., 2006. 57 Hope, 2007. 58 Boender et al., 2004. 59 Human Rights Watch, 2004. 60 Human Rights Watch, 2002. 61 Edwards, 2001: 1. 62 Mbwambo and Maman, 2007; Maganja et al., 2007. 63 Jewkes et al., 2007.
  • 38. transformative in nature in that the focus is on changing the dynamics of interaction between women and men. The projects reviewed in this chapter focused on increasing women’s empow-erment and on challenging gender norms that affect men’s health. While behavior takes lon-ger to change than knowledge and attitudes, these projects show promising results toward achieving this behavior change. Table 4.1 lists the key gender strategies used to reduce HIV/AIDS and other STIs in the programs reviewed. Table 4.1 Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales (We’re Different, We’re Equal)64 Country: Nicaragua Implementing organizations: Puntos de Encuentro; Evaluation by PATH, Horizons/Population Council, the National Autonomous University of Nicaragua’s Centro de Investigacion de Demografia y Salud (CIDS), local consul-tants, and Puntos de Encuentro. This Nicaraguan project used a communica-tions for social change strategy aimed at pro-moting the empowerment of young men and women and preventing HIV infection.The proj-ect considered machismo (a construction of masculinity that emphasizes power, aggressive-ness, and sexual prowess, among other charac-teristics) as a risk factor for HIV/AIDS. Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales used the weekly drama TV series Sexto Sentido (Sixth Sense), which was also broadcast in Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and the U.S., and the call-in radio program Sexto Sentido, to promote the gender transformative and HIV-prevention 32 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence messages. It worked with nearly 300 partners and local organizations to reduce access barriers and provide SRH services for young people. The impact evaluation of Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales included a cohort of 4,800 young peoples ages 13 to 24 who were ran-domly selected in three cities in Nicaragua in 2003 and who were interviewed three times (at the beginning, middle, and end of the interven-tion). Two hundred young people were included in focus group discussions and in-depth inter-views with participants and non-participants. Baseline data found that young people had good knowledge about HIV/AIDS; however, AIDS-related stigma was prevalent and safer sex was not regularly practiced. The final sur-vey found widespread exposure to the project, particularly the TV series Sexto Sentido, and that high exposure to project activities led to a significant reduction in stigmatizing and gen-der- inequitable attitudes, an increase in knowl-edge and use of HIV-related services, and a significant increase in interpersonal communi-cation about HIV prevention and sexual behav-ior. The evaluation found that participants with greater exposure to the intervention had a 44 percent greater probability of having used a condom during last sex with a casual partner compared to their counterparts with less expo-sure to the intervention. It also found that men with greater exposure to the intervention had a 56 percent greater probability of condom use with casual partners during the past six months. The evaluation highlighted that the SRH realities of Nicaraguan youth are complex and difficult to capture with simple outcome mea-sures such as condom use, and that individual behavior is embedded in social contexts and processes. An interesting gender-related finding of the evaluation was that while, over time, the sample of young people moved toward greater equity in gender norms, that movement did not appear to result in changes in sexual norms that are also affected by gender relations. 64 Solórzano et al., 2008. Strategies Used to Reduce HIV/AIDS and Other STIs Participatory learning workshops Follow-on community activities to put training into action Community-wide condom social marketing campaign using gender-equitable messages Community-based drama and peer education about HIV and violence Weekly TV drama and radio call in show, linked with SRH services and organizations BCC and condoms distributed through both van outreach and peer educators Female peer educators and social support Increasing male awareness and participation in RH services, including RTI/STI
  • 39. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 33 Men as Partners (MAP) Program65 Country: South Africa Implementing organizations: EngenderHealth The Men as Partners (MAP) Program, developed in 1996, has two interrelated goals.The first is to increase access to information and services that could improve men's sexual and reproduc-tive health and to promote the constructive role that men could play in both the prevention of HIV/STIs and gender-based violence as well as in maternal care and family planning. The second goal is to actively promote gender equality by engaging men to challenge the atti-tudes and behaviors that compromise their own – and women’s and children’s – health and safety. The MAP program is based on applying three related elements of constructive men’s engagement in both service delivery and com-munity settings: n That gender roles often give men the ability to influence and/or determine the reproduc-tive health choices made by women; n That gender roles also compromise men’s health by encouraging men to equate a range of risky behaviors with being a “real man,” while encouraging them to view health-seeking behaviors as a sign of weak-ness; and n That men have a personal investment in challenging the current gender order and can serve as allies to improve their own health as well as the health of women and children who are often placed at risk of vio-lence and ill-health by these gender roles. An external evaluation of one MAP workshop in Western Cape, South Africa found that partic-ipants came away from the workshops with more equitable beliefs than were held by a com-parison group of men. For example, workshop participants were three times as likely to believe that women should have the same rights as men and that it was not normal for men to beat their wives, and to be aware that children from abu-sive homes could become abusive parents and that sex workers could be raped.66 Yaari Dosti (Friendship/Bonding Among Men)67 Country: India Implementing organizations: CORO and Horizons/Population Council with support from Instituto Promundo This project is an adaptation of Program H for young men in Mumbai, India that was under-taken first as a six-month pilot program on gen-der, sexuality, masculinity, and educational activities with 126 young men.The evaluation of the pilot project included pre- and post-intervention surveys that used the GEM scale (see explanation in the case study of Program H on page 42) and other outcome measures and qualitative interviews with 31 participants. The survey findings were similar to those in Brazil: at the start of the program, a substantial portion of the young men supported many inequitable gender norms which shifted to much less support for inequitable gender norms after the program (most changes were signifi-cant at the p<.05 level). Yaari Dosti was then expanded to include a rural area of Uttar Pradesh and, in some sites, to include a com-munity- based social marketing campaign to promote gender equality and HIV prevention.68 The sample of young men included married and unmarried young men ages 16-29 in the urban areas and ages 15-24 in the rural set-tings. In the pre-intervention survey, 886 young men were included in Mumbai and 1,040 in Uttar Pradesh. The post-intervention surveys included 537 young men from Mumbai and 601 from Uttar Pradesh. The findings were similar to those of the pilot. Gender-equitable beliefs and attitudes improved, partner communication got better, and there was a significant increase in condom use at last sex with all types of partners in the intervention sites. Logistic regression showed that men in the Mumbai and rural Uttar Pradesh interventions sites were more likely (1.9 times and 2.8 times, respectively) to have used condoms with all types of partners than in the comparison sites. Furthermore, self-reported violence against partners declined in the intervention sites. 65 Levack, 2001. 66 Kruger, 2000, cited in Levack, 2001. 67 Verma et al., 2006; see also Verma et al., 2008 68 Verma et al., 2008.
  • 40. Play Safe69 Country: Cambodia Implementing organizations: Reproductive Health Initiative for Youth in Asia; evaluation by CARE International. This adolescent reproductive health project was conducted under EU/UNFPA’s Reproductive Health Initiative for Youth in Asia (RHIYA). It incorporated concepts of gender equality and human rights into activities in response to grow-ing evidence of criminal behavior toward women within Cambodia by middle class young men. The project used male peers as a way to engage young men with information about HIV/STIs and to change their behavior. Play Safe also seeks to empower young males to create positive social networks and to use them to encourage safe and responsible sexual practice. Information and behavior change communica-tion (BCC) materials and messages and con-doms were distributed through both van outreach and peer educators. An evaluation, car-ried out by CARE International in Cambodia, used primarily qualitative techniques, including a peer interview tool to collect data from 77 young people and the “most significant change (MSC)” technique, a story approach in which participants answer questions about change. The MSC was used to collect data from 20 peer educators and 40 youth. These techniques do not generate data representative of the group exposed to the project, but do provide in-depth explanations of behavioral outcomes and their potential associations with the project. Data were collected at two points during the project between 2004 and 2006. The evaluation of Play Safe found that young men had a variety of sexual partner- Improving Sexual Health for Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) must be taken in reaching MSM and TG individuals with programs and services. The three projects described in this box provide examples of gender-transfor-mative approaches used to meet the needs of MSM, including promoting legal and social rights and social acceptance. All three took place in Asia. Bandhu Social Welfare Society (BSWS) Project70 Country: Bangladesh Implementing organizations: BSWS with FHI, USAID, and PEPFAR The Bandhu Society began as a male repro-ductive health organization in 1997, offering counseling and services through outreach, drop-in centers, and health services. In 2000, FHI began supporting BSWS on a range of activities, including strengthening advocacy, research, and communication 69 Hayden, 2007. 70 FHI, 2007. Among sexual minorities, gender relations and power dynamics within individual rela-tionships and the community, and between those communities and larger societies, affect the vulnerability to and the impact of HIV/AIDS. For example, gender-related issues facing men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgendered (TG) people are complex and relate to stigma against same-sex relationships and against individ-uals whose behavior deviates from “accepted” masculine behavior in many societies. These populations lack power in society, are often socially marginalized, and have limited legal rights and protection. In addition, these populations are subject to gender-based violence – both within rela-tionships and against MSM and TG by other groups. Much more work is needed to understand and address the gender dynamics among sexual minorities and societies, and the factors that increase vul-nerability and magnify impact. Special care 34 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence systems. BSWS adapted the Naz Foundation International sexual health promotion model or service framework, which consists of: center services, including drop-in services, counseling, education and training; field ser-vices, including outreach, community mobi-lization, condom and lubricant distribution, and referrals; and health services, including STI and general health treatment, HIV test-ing, and pre- and post-test counseling. BSWS also conducted sensitization meet-ings with media representatives and journal-ists, local leaders and elites, law enforcement agencies, activists, and stu-dents. They also held coordination meetings with representatives from government and non-governmental organizations and partici-pated in World AIDS Day activities. An evaluation was conducted of BSWS’s activities, with outcomes assessed through Behavioral Surveillance Surveys (BSS) at two points in time. No outcomes were measured related to the advocacy and
  • 41. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 35 ships, ranging from “sweethearts” to casual partners to sex workers. Men’s perceptions and treatment of these partners differed, with sweethearts being treated the best and sex workers often subjected to the degrading prac-tice of bauk, or forced group sex—perceived by young men as a fun way to bond with buddies and have sex inexpensively. The second round of the evaluation found that the project was successful in reducing the practice of bauk, but only in that young men were more concerned about their own health rather than any aware-ness of the effects of bauk on women, who were in effect being gang raped. One conclu-sion reached by the evaluation was that, “While it appears that these young men are increas-ingly able to make ‘safe’ and ‘responsible’ deci-sions for themselves; to use condoms with ‘risky’ partners, access services, and seek infor-mation; they appear unable or unwilling to extend the concepts of safety and responsibility into their interactions with their female part-ners. Amongst the group of young men targeted by this research and Play Safe, this is clearly not an issue of knowledge, but of attitudes.” In the evaluation, the messages related to gender concepts, social change, and human rights were the least well-recalled and least well-followed. The evaluation called for more research on gender identity in Cambodian youth culture and for stronger programs to help men develop alternative ways to express and affirm their masculinity that are respectful of women and promote gender equality and respect for rights. In this context, stronger gender-transformative approaches are needed in future interventions in order to impact gender norms related to masculinity and women’s status that underlie the practices exhibited in bauk. communication activities. The evaluation found a sharp increase in distribution of condoms from 6,672 in 2000 to 321,112 in 2004 and of lubricant from zero to 5,870 tubes during the same period. Risk percep-tion rose from 3 to 30 percent and condom use with all partner types increased. Uptake of STI services also increased. Aksi Stop AIDS (ASA)71 Country: Indonesia Implementing organizations: FHI, USAID, and PEPFAR This project sought to decrease HIV preva-lence among MSM, male sex workers (MSW), and waria (transgender) popula-tions in selected Indonesian provinces by increasing and sustaining safer sex and health seeking behaviors (including use of condoms and lubricants). In addition, ASA worked to create a favorable environment 71 FHI, 2007. 72 FHI, 2007: 48. 73 FHI, 2007. to support program implementation and behavior change through advocacy with government agencies and networking with other organizations. Outcomes were assessed through Behavioral Surveillance Surveys (BSS) and/or Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveys (IBBS) in 2002 and 2004. The evaluation for waria found that all key sexual and health seeking behaviors showed increases during the two-year time period between BSS, including a number of statistically significant increases. However, testing remained low at 43 percent among waria in Jakarta and 20 percent in Surabaya. One benefit noted for the pro-gram for waria was that staff providing services were also waria, which facilitated contact with beneficiaries. BSS results for MSM and MSW showed positive trends in the two cities; however, given low coverage of the project, it is difficult to confirm the effect of the intervention on the results. No gender outcomes were measured. In an analysis of the three interven-tions for MSM, the evaluation recom-mended that a stronger advocacy strategy be developed that “includes a local or field-level focus, with staff at different levels working more with local police officers, religious leaders, shopkeepers, guards and other gatekeepers, to enable staff to con-duct field activities more effectively and to influence community norms.”72 Blue Diamond Society73 Country: Nepal Implementing organizations: Blue Diamond Society and FHI In Nepal, MSM are stigmatized, harassed, and often subject to brutal violence. As a result, SRH services for this population have often been neglected by both the gov-ernment and NGOs, while MSM are often continued on next page
  • 42. Improving Sexual Health for Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) continued from previous page hesitant to seek such services, leaving them more vulnerable to contracting HIV and other STIs. Since 2001, the Blue Diamond Society has worked to improve SRH of the MSM community in Nepal, employing five broad strategies, including behavior change communication (BCC), local advocacy and networking, social and community mobiliza-tion, links to services and products, and capacity building. The BCC has included group education meetings, distribution of materials, referrals for STI treatment and counseling, and condom distribution and demonstrations. The advocacy and network-ing activities addressed gender-related barri-ers to HIV prevention by seeking to raise awareness of the legal and social rights of MSM, improve social acceptance of this population, and inform and educate the MSM community. Meetings were held with various stakeholders, including NGOs, police, journalists, lawyers, and media. The Society coordinated events and special days as well as media campaigns. Film and docu-mentaries were used to inform MSM on var-ious issues such as sexual orientation. FHI conducted an evaluation of the components of the Blue Diamond Society 36 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence program that they started supporting in 2002, namely: behavior change communica-tion, legal advocacy and networking, social and community mobilization, and linkages to services and products. The evaluation showed significantly increased knowledge and safer sex behaviors among MSM who were exposed to the interventions. Although evidence of police brutality persisted, the program appeared to increase awareness of the MSM community and the need to respect their rights. mothers2mothers (m2m) Program74 Country: South Africa Implementing organizations: mothers2mothers (an NGO head-quartered in South Africa); Evaluation by Horizons/Population Council with Health Systems Trust. This program focused on prevention of mother-to- child transmission of HIV (PMTCT), empower-ing pregnant and postpartum women to improve their health and the health of their babies, fight-ing stigma, and encouraging and supporting dis-closure. The program offered educational and psychosocial support to HIV-positive pregnant women and new mothers, assisted women to access PMTCT services, and followed up to ensure care of mothers and infants after delivery. The evaluation of the m2m program was under-taken in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, by HORIZONS/Population Council in collaboration with Health Systems Trust, using a pre- and post-quasi- experimental design. At baseline, 183 HIV-positive pregnant women and 178 HIV-positive postpartum women were interviewed; at follow-up, one year after m2m was introduced, 345 HIV-positive pregnant women and 350 HIV-positive postpartum women were interviewed. In addition to a number of knowledge and practice outcomes that were measured, the evaluation assessed psy-chosocial well-being among the women. The eval-uation found that the m2m program provided a strong continuum of care to the women and infants. Compared to non-participants, m2m par-ticipants had greater psychosocial well-being and greater use of PMTCT services and outcomes. Postpartum program participants were signifi-cantly more likely than non-participants to have disclosed their status to someone, and to have done so prior to delivery. Integration of RH Services for Men in Health and Family Welfare Centers75 Country: Bangladesh Implementing organizations: National Institute for Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Directorate of Family Planning, and FRONTIERS/ Population Council. This intervention research study focused on training service providers about men’s sexual health needs, raising awareness in the commu-nity about reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in men, and improving RTI and STI services. The evaluation used a quasi-experimental non-equiv-alent control group design, with eight Health and Family Welfare Centers as intervention sites and four as control sites. Data were collected through service provider interviews, focus group discussions, inventory surveys, client exit inter- 74 Baek et al., 2007. 75 Hossain et al., 2004; Alam, Rob, and Khan, 2004.
  • 43. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 37 views, and client registers. The intervention resulted in increases in male clients seeking ser-vices at the intervention clinics from 131 to 337 per month. Most, however, still came for general health issues. The number of male RTI/STI cli-ents increased from one to more than five per month at intervention sites. Men were able to attend services during regular clinic hours. Adding RH services for men did not have an adverse affect on the number of female clients seeking services. Finally, the intervention resulted in increased knowledge among service providers about male reproductive health issues and RTIs/STIs. The study found that female ser-vice providers can successfully provide services to men. Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health76 Country: Ecuador Implementing organizations: APROFE (Association for the Benefit of the Ecuadorian Family) This initiative was undertaken as part of APROFE’s efforts to increase the number of male clients receiving the organization’s ser-vices. The initiative started in the mid-1990s and coincided with APROFE’s efforts to become more financially sustainable, to improve quality of care, and to increase focus on gender equality throughout the organization. After an initial unsuccessful attempt at establishing male clin-ics, the Involving Men initiative sought to attract men to clinics attended by women. Providers encouraged clients to bring their partners and the organization used mass media to encourage men and couples to use APROFE’s services. Hours in some clinics were extended to 7:00 pm and Saturday morning to accommodate work schedules. An evaluation was conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health through analy-sis of APROFE’s documents, interviews with pro-viders at all levels in four clinics, 28 semi-structured individual interviews, and four focus group discussions. From 1999 to 2000, the evaluation revealed an increase in the number of male clients who accompanied their partners, from an average 545 to 1,121 per month. The number of male clients who came alone also increased. For example, service statistics for urology visits registered an increase of almost 2,000 men in 2001. The gender issues raised by this intervention included the need to protect privacy of male clients and the need to get wom-en’s consent for the parts of the visits in which they wanted their partners to participate. 76 Shepard, 2004.
  • 44. HIV/AIDS/STI Case Study Intervention: Tuelimishane (“Let’s Educate Each Other”) Country: Tanzania Type of Intervention: Community theater and peer support Implementing Organizations: Tuelimishane Project Gender-Related Barriers to RH In Dar es Salaam the links between HIV, vio-lence, and infidelity are influenced by gender norms, expectations, and relationship struc-tures that characterize youth sexual relation-ships, including transactional sex. Research has shown the link between transactional sex, HIV, and intimate partner violence (see more on IPV in chapter 5). In Dar es Salaam, transactional sex is a survival strategy for some women. And in cases of infidelity or gender-based violence, women may be unlikely to stand up to their partners for fear of losing financial support. Objective The objective of the intervention was to reduce HIV-risk behaviors and reported vio-lence by young men. Strategy The program was designed based on forma-tive research among young men and women regarding the context of sexual relationships among youth at risk for HIV, including gen-der norms and roles, partner violence, and sexual behavior. The theme of transactional sex and the roles of young men and women in the practice also emerged in the formative research. The intervention was composed of two main components: community theater and peer support groups. The community theater groups developed three skits, each focusing on a different theme (sexual communication, infidelity, and conflict resolution.) There were a total of 21 public performances in locations where young men frequently hang out. The performances communicated information regarding violence, sexual negotiation, sexual responsibility, and HIV risk, and engaged the audience in discussion surrounding the main theme. Low-literacy print comics were also distributed. Peer support groups of 10-12 young men were formed to create a safe place to discuss topics related to social norms, gen-der, HIV/AIDS, infidelity, sexual communica-tion, and conflict resolution. The support groups developed key messages that were used in the drama intervention, and then reinforced those messages. In addition to the same-sex peer groups, mixed-sex and mixed-age groups were formed to encour-age dialogue across a broader audience and to give young men the opportunity to hear different perspectives related to sexual behavior and gender-based violence. Evaluation Design: Pretest-posttest control group design The evaluation consisted of four phases: formative, baseline survey, implementation, and post-intervention research. Forty men and 20 women (ages 16-24 years) were interviewed and 14 focus groups were con-ducted during the formative phase. A com-munity mapping exercise identified social venues for youth, transportation routes, and other community features that could affect the intervention. Baseline surveys were con-ducted in the intervention and control sites, with 503 and 448 respondents, respectively. Table 4.2 Reproductive Health Outcomes Variable Control Intervention Did not use condom during last sex with primary partner 78 (56.9%) 91 (44.8%) N=137 N=203 Condom use reported less than half the time with partners 70 (55.1%) 60 (36.4%) in past 6 months N=127 N = 165 Proportion of men who agree or strongly agree with statement that violence vs. women could be justified if: She does not complete household work 53 (20.6%) 25 (8.3%) N = 257 N = 301 A woman disobeys her partner 61 (23.7%) 29 (9.7%) N = 257 N = 300 He suspects she is unfaithful 32 (12.4%) 17 (5.6%) N = 258 N = 302 He learns she is unfaithful 56 (21.7%) 26 (8.6%) N = 258 N = 301 She asks him to use condoms 26 (10.2%) 13 (4.3%) N = 256 N = 301 Source: Mbwambo and Maman, 2007. 3388 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 38
  • 45. Table 4.3 Gender Outcomes Significant Gender Outcomes Of those who agreed/strongly agreed at baseline, proportion of men who disagreed/strongly Control Intervention Men should have the final say in all family matters 34 (19.0%) 104 (51.2%) There is nothing a woman can do if her partner wants 43 (47.3%) 81 (80.2%) to have other girlfriends N=91 N=101 A wife should tolerate being beaten to keep the 59 (46.5%) 72 (61.0%) family together N=127 N=118 A woman needs her husband’s permission to work 31 (14.4%) 68 (30.4%) It’s a woman’s job to take care of her home and cook 37 (17.5%) 94 (42.3%) for her family. N=212 N=222 Source: Mbwambo and Maman, 2007. The baseline surveys recorded information regarding demographics, gender roles and norms, attitudes toward and experiences of violence, HIV risk behaviors, and use of physical and sexual violence. The post-inter-vention assessment interviewed a total of 315 men in the intervention community (62.6%) and 266 men in the control com-munity (59.4%). The post-intervention and baseline survey were identical in the control community, with an added section on inter-vention exposure for men in the intervention site. Female partners of 20 men were inter-viewed as part of the post-intervention assessment. Reproductive Health Outcomes Two of the six variables measuring HIV-risk behaviors were found to be significant. Men in the intervention community were signifi-cantly more likely to have used a condom disagreed at endline N=179 N=203 N=215 N=224 during their last sexual experience and in the past six months. While there were no significant differ-ences regarding reported use of violence, the study did find improvement in attitudes, with men in the intervention village signifi-cantly less likely to report that violence against women is justified under various scenarios. Young men in the intervention commu-nity were significantly more likely to have favorably changed their attitudes regarding gender norms. In an interview, one 20-year old female partner said, “Yes, for example, our communication has become much bet-ter than the way it used to be; now he shows that he understands me and he agrees with most of the things which I advise him.” Limitations It was difficult to keep men engaged in the peer support component of the intervention, perhaps because in urban settings like Dar es Salaam many of the men migrate. In rural settings, where young men are less mobile, a 12-month program may be more successful in keeping men engaged. Conclusions This community-based communication intervention was designed to reduce rates of HIV-risk behaviors and reported use of vio-lence by young men. The evaluation showed some evidence that men had changed their behaviors related to condom use for HIV prevention. Though there were no signifi-cant changes in use of violence, results showed significant changes in norms and attitudes regarding violence among men in the intervention community. Youth who participated in the drama group portrayed stories that happened within their own community. The participatory nature of the community drama intervention demonstrated that solutions to combating HIV/AIDS are available from within the com-munity itself. Youth were able to develop a deeper understanding of HIV/AIDS and capacity to communicate about these issues with other community members. References R.K. Maganja, S. Maman, A. Groves, and J.K. Mbwambo. “Skinning the Goat and Pulling the Load: Transactional Sex Among Youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.” AIDS Care 19, no. 8 (2007): 974-981. Jessie Mbwambo and Suzanne Maman, HIV and Violence Prevention. Horizons Final Report (Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007). 39 Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 39
  • 46. Gender-Related Barriers to RH In South Africa, gender norms influence male and female power dynamics, resulting in gender-inequitable intimate relationships. Norms limit women’s agency in many areas, including restricting their ability to negotiate sex and to demand condom use from their partners. This is particularly true of partners of migrant laborers who are most at risk of HIV and others STIs. Because educational and economic opportunities for women are limited, some women use transactional and commercial sex work as a survival strategy, and research has shown the link between these behaviors and increased HIV risk. Objective Stepping Stones is a gender-transformative HIV-prevention program that aims to improve sexual health through building stronger, more gender-equitable relation-ships with better communication between partners. Strategy The Stepping Stones intervention is imple-mented using participatory learning approaches in single-sex peer groups. The evaluation was implemented from 2003 –2005. Eleven same-sex project staff mem-bers, slightly older than the participants, were trained for three weeks prior to imple-mentation. They facilitated the sessions (described below), employing adult educa-tion methods including role play, spider dia-grams, and similar exercises. The program contains 13 sessions, each three-hours long, and three peer group meetings. The issues covered in the 13 ses-sions include reflecting on love, sexual health joys and problems, body mapping, menstruation, contraception and conception (including infertility), sexual problems, unwanted pregnancy, HIV/STIs, safe sex, gender-based violence, motivations for sex-ual behavior, and dealing with grief and loss. The intervention relied on same-sex peer groups “as this format gives the best oppor-tunity for frank discussion and a supportive environment for exploring behaviour change.”77 The male and female groups were conducted in parallel sessions and came together in three meetings to present exercises and promote dialogue. During these three sessions, groups present exer-cises they have been working on that pro-mote dialogue and communication. The second intervention (the control arm) was a single two- to three-hour ses-sion with exercises about HIV and safer sex practices drawn from the Stepping Stones curriculum. Efforts were made to gain community support for the project by involving impor-tant stakeholders and holding community meetings. The project had an active commu-nity advisory board composed of members from Departments of Health and Education, from municipalities, local traditional leaders, 40 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence the National Association for People with HIV/AIDS, the University of Transkei (UNITRA), and young people approximately the same age as study participants. Evaluation Design: Cluster randomized-controlled trial The evaluation was completed in 70 clusters (each cluster was usually a village) at least 10 kilometers apart. Study participants included 1360 men and 1416 women, ages 15–26 years. Study villages were assigned to receive either the complete Stepping Stones intervention or the single 2-3 hour session control. Participants were inter-viewed prior to the implementation and gave blood for an HIV and Herpes test. Participants were re-interviewed and re-tested 12 and 24 months after the first interview. Qualitative research was completed in two of the clusters with 10 women and 11 men. Each participant was interviewed prior to and after participating in Stepping Stones. Reproductive Health Outcomes Women in the intervention arm had 15 per-cent fewer new HIV infections than those in the control arm [incidence rate ratio = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.60, 1.20)] and 31 percent fewer Herpes infections [incidence rate ratio = HIV/AIDS/STI Case Study Intervention: Stepping Stones Country: South Africa Type of Intervention: HIV prevention Implementing Organizations: Medical Research Council 77 Jewkes et al., 2006: 5.
  • 47. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 41 0.69 (95% CI: 0.47, 1.03)]. Neither was sig-nificant at the 5% level. Findings did, however, show significant improvement in a number of reported risk behaviors in men, with men reporting fewer partners and higher condom use, as well as less transactional sex, perpetration of inti-mate partner violence, and substance use. The same behavior changes were not found in women, and there was actually an increase in transactional sex. This finding could be linked to possible under-reporting of sexual activity by women at baseline. Gender Outcomes Qualitative data suggest that the intervention improved couple communication and increased men’s and women’s awareness that violence against women was wrong. Limitations The scope of the Stepping Stones interven-tion for the randomized control trial, includ-ing the age ranges included, was limited by resources available for the study and the evaluation. A large proportion of the partici-pants did not attend all the sessions and, therefore, the full impact of the intervention may have been underestimated. Another limitation is that an overly optimistic assumption about the reduction in HIV infections limits the statistical analysis due to a small sample size. Replication The Stepping Stones intervention was ini-tially developed for use in Uganda. Over the last 10 years the intervention has been used in 40 countries, adapted for at least 17 set-tings, and translated into at least 13 lan-guages. Stepping Stones has developed an adaptation guide, to provide guidance to organizations adapting the program for the first time or for organizations wishing to make changes to an existing Stepping Stones curriculum. Conclusions Evaluation of the Stepping Stones program suggests that the intervention reduced new HIV and other STI infections among women. The intervention showed significant improvement in reducing risk behaviors in men. The program has been widely repli-cated throughout the world, and translated into multiple languages. References Family Health International. “Barriers to HIV Prevention.” Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009, at www.fhi.org/en/HIVAIDS/pub/guide/cor-rhope/ corrbar.htm. R. Jewkes, M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, N. Khuzwayo, M. Koss, A. Puren, K. Wood, and N. Duvvury. "A Cluster Randomized-Controlled Trial to Determine the Effectiveness of Stepping Stones in Preventing HIV Infections and Promoting Safer Sexual Behaviour Amongst Youth in the Rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: Trial Design, Methods And Baseline Findings." In Tropical Medicine and International Health 11, no.1 (2006): 3-16. R. Jewkes, M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. “Impact of Stepping Stones on HIV, HSV-2 and Sexual Behaviour in Rural South Africa: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.” In British Medical Journal 337, no.71 (2008):a506. R. Jewkes, M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, K. Wood, M. Koss, A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. Evaluation of Stepping Stones: A Gender Transformative HIV Prevention Intervention (Pretoria: MRC, 2007).
  • 48. HIV/AIDS/STI Case Study Intervention: Program H Country: Brazil Type of Intervention: HIV/AIDS prevention Implementing Organizations: Instituto Promundo Costs: $35,856.97 (group education and lifestyle marketing campaign n = 258); and $21,060.28 (group education only n = 250). Cost analysis for replications of Program H has shown intervention costs to range from $25,000 - $50,000. Gender-Related Barriers to RH In Latin America there exist many traditional beliefs on masculinity, including that men have more and stronger sexual urges than women, men have the right to decide when and where to have sex, sexual and repro-ductive health issues are women's con-cerns, men have the right to outside partners or relationships, and men have the right to dominate women. These traditional macho beliefs promote inequitable intimate relationships and sustain and support risky behaviors among men who have internalized such norms. Women are often unable to negotiate safe sexual practices with their partners. Additionally, women are unlikely to carry out risk-reducing or protective behav-iors, such as carrying condoms with them, for fear of gaining a reputation of being pro-miscuous. Objective The study examined the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve young men’s (ages 14–25) attitudes toward gender norms and to reduce HIV/STI risk. Strategy The intervention focused on helping young men to question traditional norms related to masculinity and to discuss inequitable gen-der- related views and the advantages of more gender-equitable behaviors. It used group education activities that encouraged reflection on what it means to “be a man.” Intervention activities included two main components: a field-tested curriculum used in same-sex groups and a lifestyle social marketing campaign. One intervention site, Bangu, received both the group educa-tion and lifestyle social marketing campaign, and the second site, Maré, received only the group education component. The group education component con-tained: 1) a 20-minute no-word cartoon video highlighting one man’s experiences from childhood to early adulthood; and 2) 70 activities (role plays, brainstorming exer-cises, discussion sessions, and individual reflection) covering five themes (sexuality and reproductive health, fatherhood and care-giving, from violence to peaceful coex-istence, reasons and emotions [including communication skills, substance abuse, and mental health], and preventing and living with HIV/AIDS). Weekly two-hour sessions were held over a period of six months. Five male facilitators were trained on the ratio-nale for the intervention; intervention mate-rials; study objective, design, and methodology; timeline for group activities; and logistics. The social marketing campaign (a behavior change communication campaign) promoted a more gender-equitable lifestyle and HIV/STI/violence prevention at the com-munity level, reinforcing the messages given in the group education sessions. Peer pro-moters, young men recruited from the com-munity, helped to implement the campaign. They identified sources of information and cultural outlets in the community. They also developed intervention messages using radio spots, billboards, posters, postcards, and dances, about how “cool and hip” it was to be a gender-equitable man. Additionally, the campaign presented condom use and negoti-ation as elements of a gender-equitable life-style, aiming to increase the availability of a new condom brand (Hora H) through strate-gic distribution, including bars, community dances, and parties. Evaluation Design: Quasi-experimental control design The Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) Scale was used to determine men’s attitudes toward gender norms at baseline (n = 780) and post-intervention in three sites (two inter-vention and one control/delayed.) Multivariate logistic regression analyses for correlated data were used, controlling for age, family income, and education. Reproductive Health Outcomes Findings indicate that improvements in gen-der norm scale scores were associated with changes in at least one key HIV/STI risk out-come (e.g., STI symptoms, condom use). For both intervention sites, positive changes in attitudes toward inequitable gender norms over one year was significantly asso-ciated with decreased reports of STI symp-toms (p < .001). In the intervention sites of Bangu and Maré, young men were approxi-mately four times and eight times less likely to report STI symptoms over time, respec-tively. A significant association was not found for condom use, but a trend in the 4422 42 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence 42
  • 49. expected direction was seen in one interven-tion village. Gender Outcomes At six months, agreement with inequitable gender norms significantly decreased in both intervention sites (10 out of 17 items improved in Bangu and 13 out of 17 items improved in Maré). These positive changes were sustained at the one-year follow-up period. Only one out of 17 items improved in the control area. Limitations Similar to other interventions involving young men, Program H struggled with attendance issues. Nearly 30 percent of the participants attended the majority of the sessions, while more than 50 percent of the participants attended less than half. Work was the number one reason given for miss-ing a session. Among participants who attended the majority of the sessions and those who attended less than half, there were no significant differences in work sta-tus, age group, education level, number of sexual partners, and attitudes toward gender at baseline. Monitoring data showed that some groups had higher than average par-ticipation rates, and some facilitators were more successful in generating interest and consistent participation. Replication Program H has been replicated in several places throughout Brazil and the world. An evaluation of Yaari Dosti (Program H replicated in Mumbai, India, see page 33) showed similar gender outcomes, with significantly more men supporting gender-equitable norms. Two additional programs, Program M and Program D, have been developed utiliz-ing the same strategies as Program H to promote young women’s health and reduce homophobia, respectively. Conclusions The young men in the study, from three low-income communities (favelas) in Rio de Janeiro, started the study reporting substan-tial risk of HIV and STIs. Support for inequi-table gender norms and roles was significantly associated with HIV risk. The program resulted in significantly smaller percentages of young men supporting ineq-uitable gender norms. Significant improve-ments were also found in HIV/AIDS outcomes, including STI symptoms and condom use, particularly in the area with the combination of group discussions and social marketing. Decrease in support for inequitable gender norms was associated with decreased reports of STI symptoms. The positive changes in attitudes toward gender norms were equally signifi-cant for both groups of young men exposed to either the combination intervention or education activities alone. This implies that the group education component was likely most successful in addressing gender-related attitudes. However, findings show changes were often greater for young men exposed to the combined intervention. This highlights the importance of both interper-sonal and community-level communication strategies. Evaluation of Program H illustrates the link between gender-inequitable attitudes and HIV/STI risk behaviors and outcomes. It also shows that group education programs focusing on gender-equitable relationships and BCC campaigns combating inequitable gender norms can lead to more gender-equitable relationships and improved HIV/ STI outcomes. References J. Pulerwitz, G. Barker, M. Segundo, and M. Nascimento. Promoting More Gender-equitable Norms and Behaviors Among Young Men as an HIV/AIDS Prevention Strategy (Washington, DC: Horizons, 2006). R.K. Verma, J. Pulerwitz, V. Mahendra, S. Khandekar, G. Barker, P. Fulpagare, and S.K. Singh (2006). “Challenging and Changing Gender Attitudes Among Young Men in Mumbai, India.” Reproductive Health Matters 14, no. 28 (2006): 135. 43 Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs 43
  • 50. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health Although the 2004 “So What?” report did not include a chapter devoted to harmful practices, this chapter has been added in this publication for two reasons: first, because of the substantial role of such practices in under-mining RH, especially among young women; and second, because some of the most innova-tive, gender-transformative work in the repro-ductive and sexual health field focuses on the reduction of harmful practices. Interventions are classified here by three types of harmful practices: early marriage and childbearing (EM&C); female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C); and gender-based violence, specifical-ly, intimate partner violence/sexual violence (IPV/SV). I. Early Marriage and Childbearing Early marriage and childbearing (EM&C) is asso-ciated with a wide range of negative social and health consequences. It is an abuse of girls’ human rights, robbing them of educational and economic opportunities as well as the chance simply to be children. In some settings, mar-riages are arranged in infancy and there is varia-tion in the age at which co-habitation begins. In other settings, both the husband and the wife are married in their teenage years. Often, how-ever, female brides are much younger than their husbands, and they are unready for sex, espe-cially with an older stranger. In these situations, sexual initiation after an early marriage often amounts to socially sanctioned rape, in some cases legal, and in others (where marriages take place before the statutory minimum age) techni-cally illegal but virtually never prosecuted. Early marriage almost always leads to early childbearing.78 About 15 million young women between 15 and 19 years of age give birth every year, accounting for over 10 percent of the births worldwide. Most of these young mothers are married.79 Early childbearing has been shown to contribute to mortality and morbidity during pregnancy, labor, and delivery, and increases the risk of premature births.80 It also contributes to rapid population growth. In countries where contraceptive use is at least moderately high, increasing the number of years between generations by increasing the age at which women begin having children may have a greater impact in reducing population growth than further reducing fertility rates.81 EM&C Interventions The three EM&C interventions reviewed are broad in focus. All employed gender transfor- 78 Adhikari, 2003. 79 ICRW, 2004. 80 UNICEF, 2001. 81 Bongaarts, 1994; Caldwell and Caldwell, 2003. 5 Program Country EM&C: Behane Hewan Ethiopia Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ India Reproductive and Sexual Health CASE STUDY: India Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra FGM/C: Navrongo FGM/C Experiment Ghana Awash FGM/C Elimination Project Ethiopia, Kenya Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C Ethiopia CASE STUDY: Senegal Tostan Community-based Education Program Gender-Based Violence: Soul City South Africa Through Our Eyes Liberia One Man Can Campaign South Africa CASE STUDY: Intervention with Microfinance South Africa for AIDS and Gender Equity (IMAGE) 44 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 51. Table 5.1 Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 45 mative approaches and sought to influence atti-tudes and behaviors of a range of community stakeholders. One of them, Delaying Age at Marriage In Rural Maharashtra, is one of the case studies (see p. 52). It is a life skills educa-tion project with unmarried adolescent girls on a variety of topics. Table 5.1 lists the gender strategies used to reduce early marriage and childbearing in the projects reviewed. Behane Hewan82 Country: Ethiopia Implementing organizations: Ethiopian Ministry of Youth and Sport, with the Amhara Regional Youth Bureau, and UNFPA, with technical assistance from the Population Council This pilot program in a village in rural Ethiopia sought to sensitize communities to the risks and disadvantages associated with child mar-riage, promote education to prevent early mar-riage among adolescents, and provide support for girls who were already married. The inter-ventions included social mobilization of adoles-cent girls who formed groups led by female mentors, with encouragement to stay in school, nonformal education and livelihood programs for out-of-school girls, community dialogue on early marriage and health issues affecting girls, and fiscal incentives to families who did not marry off their daughters during the project period. Using a quasi-experimental case control design, the Behane Hewan program evaluation focused on four areas of interest: education, social networks and participation, marital sta-tus, and RH. The evaluation results showed sig-nificant impacts in all four areas: n Girls in the intervention village were three times as likely to be in school as girls in the control village; n Knowledge and communication on HIV, STIs, and FP increased in the intervention village, compared with the control village; n Younger adolescents (ages 10-14) were 90 percent less likely to be married than con-trol group girls of the same age; n Not a single girl ages 10-14 in the interven-tion area was married during the year between the two surveys (although marriag-es in this village accelerated after the age of 15 years, probably because the expectation that girls should marry during adolescence persisted); and n Use of contraception among girls, which was at comparable levels in the two sites at the beginning of the project, was three times higher in the intervention village at the end of the project. Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ Reproductive and Sexual Health Project83 Country: India Implementing organizations: ICRW with Swaasthya This intervention was carried out by ICRW with Swaasthya in two urban slums in Delhi. The program provided life skills education for unmarried adolescent girls, focusing on girls’ age at marriage, self-esteem, and nutritional needs. The project in the first site, Tigri, ran from 1998-2001, followed by a sustainability study ending in 2005; a replication at the sec-ond site, Naglamachi, ran from 2003-2006. While the target participants for the program were unmarried girls, Swaasthya also included a component to encourage adults to be more supportive of adolescent girls and sensitive to their needs. The Building Life Skills Project was evalu-ated using baseline and endline surveys with-out control groups. In one site, the evaluation found that exposure to skills-building modules, social support, and one-on-one interaction with a Swaasthya fieldworker was associated with high knowledge of sexual and reproductive health among the unmarried girls and young 82 Erulkar and Muthengi, 2009. 83 Pande et al., 2006. Strategies Used to Reduce Early Marriage and Childbearing (EM&C) Encourage boys and girls to examine notions of gender Include messages about risks of early marriage and childbearing Increase skills of providers to reach young women and men Sensitize communities about EM&C Institute life skills for unmarried adolescent girls (nutrition, self-esteem, and age at marriage)
  • 52. women involved in the project, a strong per-ception of support from mothers and other gatekeepers, and a positive perspective on life. In the second, more socially conservative site, the findings were weaker. The sustainability analysis in the first site showed that some out-comes, such as changes in knowledge, were largely sustained, but that the program inter-ventions were not continued by Swaasthya fieldworkers after outside support was with-drawn. Knowledge of sexual and reproductive health also decreased, suggesting that consis-tent input is needed to maintain knowledge among this target group. II. Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting (FGM/C) The practice of FGM/C affects between 100 mil-lion and 140 million women and girls world-wide, most of whom live on the African continent. In some settings, the cutting is much more extensive than in others. The prac-tice of FGM/C tends to be associated with par-ticular ethnic groups more than with nations or religions, socio-economic status, or educational levels.84 In Kenya, for example, almost all women of reproductive age among the Somali, Kisii, and Maasai ethnic groups have undergone some type of FGM/C.85 Forms of FGM/C range from infibulation, the most severe, in which all external genitalia is removed and the vaginal opening is stitched and narrowed, leaving a small hole for urine and menstrual flow, to less extreme cutting in which the clitoris or clitoral hood is nicked or removed.86 FGM/C can lead to immediate complications, such as hemor-rhaging and infection. The more severe forms can lead to long-term effects, such as poor maternal and newborn health outcomes, pro-longed labor, and socially debilitating condi-tions such as malodorous urine retention or painful and difficult sexual relations with resulting problems between couples.87 In the last two decades, FGM/C has gained international recognition as a health and human rights issue and funding for interven-tion projects and research has increased. The most promising approaches include commu-nity- based solutions and addressing rights as well as the social, legal, economic, and health dimensions of FGM/C. Several donor organiza-tions 46 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence have reached consensus about the most effective approach to FGM/C interventions, as articulated in “Toward a Common Framework for the Abandonment of FGM/C”.88 FGM/C Interventions The four FGM/C projects reviewed are all set in Africa, and all four approaches are gender transformative to some extent. The projects combine FGM/C interventions with interven-tions on other topics and all have emphasized community involvement, taking into account community attitudes regarding gender roles. The case study presented here is Tostan’s Community-Based Education Program. This Senegalese NGO project seeks to transform cul-tural norms rather than just behavior (see p. 54). Tostan, plus two of the other interventions — by Navrongo and CARE — have been exten-sively evaluated, while IntraHealth’s interven-tion in Ethiopia had a much more limited evaluation. Table 5.2 lists the gender strategies used in the projects to reduce FGM/C that were reviewed. Navrongo FGM/C Experiment89 Country: Ghana Implementing organizations: Navrongo Health Research Center (NHRC) This project employed a mixed gender strat-egy— transformative in attempting to influence cultural expectations regarding girls and women, but also accommodating gender expec-tations by training girls in domestic tasks as they would be trained as part of the rituals sur-rounding FGM/C. The objective of the project was to accelerate abandonment of FGM/C in six villages of the Kassena-Nanka district of Northern Ghana. The project employed a strong community engagement and mobiliza-tion component, using an approach known locally as alagube (“connoting the process by 84 Chege et al, 2004; see also PRB, 2008. 85 Kenya DHS, 2003. 86 WHO, 2008. 87 See H. Jones et al., 1999; L. Morison et al., 2001; WHO, 2006; PRB, 2008. 88 UNICEF, 2007. 89 Feldman-Jacobs and Ryniak et al., 2006.
  • 53. Table 5.2 Strategies Used to Reduce Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting (FGM/C) Promote model for change: girls right to education; women’s union to demand rights; strengthening women’s position in the family Influence cultural expectations regarding girls and women Train girls in domestic tasks they would learn as part of FGM/C rituals Promote dialogue between women and men on gender and FGM/C health-related issues Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 47 which people solve a common problem by pool-ing their individual and community social resources”).90 The target audience (women and adolescent girls) was involved in one of three sets of activities: 1) FGM/C-related education alone; 2) livelihood and development activities alone (such as learning how to do handicrafts or about micro-lending); and 3) a combination of FGM/C education and livelihood and devel-opment activities. In both the education and livelihood and development sessions, women and girls met in large groups (70 participants) twice monthly for two-hour sessions. The project used a “4-cell experiment” design, with each cell, or community, receiving one of four interventions: 1) No intervention or control group; 2) education activities; 3) livelihood and development activities; 4) combination of educa-tion and livelihood and development activities. A baseline survey covered 3,221 respondents; follow-up surveys were undertaken each year between 1999 – 2003 to monitor and evaluate outcomes. Cox Proportional Hazard regression models were used to analyze the survey data and measure the impact of the interventions on girls’ likelihood of being cut. The results of the analysis indicate impressive reductions in FGM/C in the experimental groups: one year of the FGM/C education strategy was associated with a 93 percent decrease in the risk of being cut; one year of the combination education plus livelihood was associated with a 94 per-cent decrease in the risk, compared to the con-trol group. However, substantial reductions of FGM/C in the comparison area plus the reliabil-ity of self-reporting on a practice that is against the law in that country, raise questions about the validity of the responses. Awash FGM/C Elimination Project91 Country: Kenya and Ethiopia Implementing organizations: CARE with local organizations and Population Council This project sought to empower women to attend and participate in meetings to discuss health-related issues with their male partners. Set in six villages in Ethiopia and two refugee camps in Kenya, the project focused on behav-ior change communication (BCC) education and advocacy, with an emphasis on creating dialogue between women and men on FGM/C and other topics related to health and gender, and strengthening spousal communication regarding family planning. A variety of commu-nication channels were used: a) meetings with community groups, women’s groups, health education groups, and schools; b) performances by popular theatre groups; c) evening video ses-sions that showed recorded discussions by reli-gious leaders speaking out on FGM/C issues; and d) mass media activities. CARE believed that the feasibility of these projects depended on FGM/C being linked with a broader set of RH issues rather than as a stand-alone inter-vention, thus reducing the danger of it being seen as an agenda imposed by outsiders. The Population Council/FRONTIERS con-ducted an operations research study that com-pared two Awash interventions, each with a control group. Using a quasi-experimental design, the intervention sites were purposively selected to correspond to Awash FGM/C Elimination project areas and nearby sites were selected for comparison purposes. The actual intervention, which began with the introduc-tion of expanded (in Kenya) and new (in Ethiopia) FGM/C abandonment activities, occurred over a 21-month period from January 2001 through June 2002 (in Kenya) and October 2002 (in Ethiopia). The study assessed the effectiveness of BCC and advocacy activi-ties versus no interventions in Ethiopia, while in Kenya the comparison was between BCC strategies alone and the combination of BCC and advocacy activities. The interventions were more successful in Ethiopia than Kenya. In all knowledge and atti- 90 Feldman-Jacobs and Ryniak et al., 2006. 91 Care, 2005.
  • 54. tude indicators assessed, the intervention site in Ethiopia showed more positive change than Kenya, and it is not clear if the advocacy strat-egy added much value to the intervention in Kenya. Moreover, in Kenya the comparison site performed better on all attitude and intended behavior indicators. The evaluators attributed this unexpected result to a failure to implement the advocacy strategy effectively as well as to pre-existing socio-economic differences in the intervention and control populations. In both countries the study designs were not adhered to; project interventions as well as influences from outside the project affected the outcomes of interest. They also cited contamination in the study design in both Kenya and Ethiopia due to population movements into and out of the intervention and comparison areas. In both countries, there was active public debate on the merits of continuing the prac-tice, and some uncut girls, men, women, and families publicly stated that they did not want to continue the practice. In both countries, tra-ditional leaders began to address the issue of protection of those wishing to remain uncut, an area of adjudication never-before addressed. In Ethiopia, 70 elders made open declarations that their villages would henceforth not cut their daughters. Five-Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting92 Country: Ethiopia Implementing organizations: IntraHealth International The objective of this multi-pronged project was to both increase knowledge about FGM/C and to change behavior. It encouraged women’s empowerment while acknowledging their lack of power by helping them to voice their con-cerns about FGM/C to influential men. Abandonment of FGM/C was addressed through five perspectives: health, gender, law/human rights, religion, and information. IntraHealth emphasized community empowerment and mobilization along with advocacy to encourage long-term sustainability. Undertaken from 2003-2005, the project was introduced across eight sites in regions with higher than average prevalence of FGM/C (in one site it was as high as 99 percent). While the project was designed to include all community members with a stake in the practice of FGM/C, specific groups were identified and targeted through tailored inter-ventions. 48 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence More than 4,200 community mem-bers, both men and women, participated in the project’s training, information, education, and communication community mobilization activi-ties, and many more were reached through related national and local media programs, including broadcasts on television and radio, and printed materials in local languages. Interventions included national and regional workshops, training of trainers, community leadership training and community mobiliza-tion, Public Declarations, and a religious lead-ers’ forum. As a result of one IntraHealth workshop, teachers, media, and religious leaders joined together to make a public declaration that they would work to stop gender inequities and oppression and the practice of FGM/C. The project also formed associations of non-circum-cised girls and mothers of non-circumcised girls as well as a community network to protect girls from FGM/C and report any occurrence to the regional gender bureau and police station. The qualitative evaluation conducted by IntraHealth included focus group discussions with community leaders and suggested a change in attitudes regarding marriage to non-circumcised girls. However, there was no sub-stantiation of attitudinal or behavior change. Plans to do a quantitative evaluation were dis-rupted by calls for a national election, which occupied many of the community leaders. III. Gender-Based Violence Gender-based violence, including intimate part-ner violence (IPV) and sexual violence (SV), are worldwide public health problems associ-ated with a wide range of negative physical, psychological, social, and economic conse-quences for abused women themselves and for children whose mothers are exposed to vio-lence. 93 The reported prevalence of IPV/SV var-ies considerably across settings. A multi-country WHO study reported rates as 92 Feldman-Jacobs and Ryniak et al., 2006. 93 Garcia-Moreno et al., 2005; Heise and Garcia-Moreno, 2002; Heise, Ellsberg, and Gottemoeller, 2002; Heise, Pitanguy, and Germain, 1994.
  • 55. Table 5.3 Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 49 high as 71 percent in rural Ethiopia and between 21 and 47 percent in most countries.94 In analyses of data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted between 1995 and 2004 in 12 countries, prevalence of domes-tic violence ranged from 18 to 53 percent.95 Gender-Based Violence Interventions The gender-based violence (GBV) interventions featured here focused on intimate partner vio-lence (IPV), physical violence perpetrated by men against their female partners, as well as sexual violence (SV). Although psychological violence is also a common form of IPV/SV, none of the interventions directly addressed it, per-haps because it tends to be more subjectively defined and, therefore, difficult to measure. Like many of the EM&C and FGM/C interven-tions described above, the projects with docu-mented success in addressing IPV/SV also adopted multi-sectoral, multi-dimensional approaches to reducing harmful practices. All of the evaluated interventions that were found on IPV/SV were gender transformative in nature as they sought to change a harmful behavior rooted in gender inequality. They all were situated in Africa, particularly in South Africa, where rates of IPV/SV are among the highest in the world.96 Only one of the four interventions discussed in this GBV section focuses primarily on engag-ing men: the One Man Can Campaign in South Africa. The objective of this project is to stop IPV/SV, promote healthy relations, and prevent HIV/AIDS. (Another example from South Africa, “Men as Partners,” is described in the chapter on HIV/AIDS; and “Visions,” a nonformal educa-tion program for youth in Egypt described in the youth chapter, also includes the topic of IPV/ SV.) Soul City and IMAGE (case study, p. x) had the most rigorous evaluations. Table 5.3 lists the gender strategies employed in the projects reviewed to reduce IPV/SV. Soul City97 Country: South Africa Implementing organizations: South African Soul City Institute for Health and Development Communication (a multi-media health promotion project) working with the National Network on Violence Against Women This project began with the premise that behavior change interventions aimed solely at individuals have limited impact. Soul City, therefore, sought to influence women and men at multiple mutually-reinforcing levels — indi-vidual and community as well as socio-political environment — through prime-time radio and television dramas and print material. This method has been dubbed “edutainment,” where social issues are integrated into enter-tainment formats such as television and radio to reach marginalized rural communities in particular. Domestic violence was the major focus in Soul City’s fourth television and radio series, aired between July and December 1999. The intervention sought to create an enabling envi-ronment for behavior change by advocating for the implementation of the 1998 Domestic Violence Act (DVA). The series provided role models for the use of the DVA and a helpline was established to provide more information. The series also promoted interpersonal and community dialogue and encouraged collective efficacy and action to shift social norms, increase supportive behavior, and link people to sources of support. At the individual level, the intervention aimed to influence knowledge, awareness, attitudes, self-efficacy, intention to change, and practices. 94 Garcia-Moreno et al., 2005. 95 Kishor and Johnson, 2004. 96 Mathews et al., 2004. 97 Usdin et al., 2005. Strategies Used to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence/ Sexual Violence Engage men to stop violence against women through participatory work-shops and community interventions Institute microfinance-based poverty alleviation programs and participatory trainings Address individual, community, and socio-political levels – ‘edutainment’ Amplify voices from within the community through participatory community engagement in producing video tapes on IPV/SV and health issues Create action kits to engage men in stopping violence against women
  • 56. The evaluation of Soul City was multifac-eted, consisting of several inter-related studies, triangulated to improve validity of the results. These included national-level pre/post surveys and a qualitative impact assessment using 29 focus groups and 32 in-depth interviews. The evaluation showed an impact on attitudes, help-seeking behaviors, and participation in community action, though not in the actual incidence of IPV/SV.98 There was a shift in knowledge regarding domestic violence, with 41 percent of respondents gaining knowledge about the project’s helpline. Attitudinal shifts following the intervention include a 10 percent increase in respondents disagreeing that IPV/ SV is a private affair and a 22 percent shift in perceptions of social norms regarding IPV/SV. Differences between male and female respon-dents on these outcomes were not reported. The evaluation concluded that 1) the inter-vention played a decisive role in implementa-tion of the Domestic Violence Act, and 2) a strong association existed between exposure to the intervention and a number of factors indic-ative of and necessary to bring about social change. Through Our Eyes99 Country: Liberia Implementing organizations: The American Refugee Committee (ARC) and Communication for Change This is a unique behavior change project set in Liberian refugee camps and launched in 2006 by Liberian refugees in Guinea with support from the American Refugee Committee (ARC) and its partner, Communication for Change. By producing video tapes on the subjects of IPV/ SV and health issues, which are played back to the community, it aims to amplify voices from within the community through participatory community engagement. The Liberia-based team has produced more than 30 videos and conducted dozens of playback sessions about such highly sensitive subjects as rape, forced marriage, teenage prostitution, unintended pregnancy, STIs, and equal rights for women and girls. Recent videos have focused on gen-der roles and women’s empowerment (e.g. “Making Family Decisions,” “Women are Roosters Too,” “Women Freedom in Society,” “Nennie Nyan Daa Porlie Gehye: Women Can Do It”), seeking to promote more nuanced and sustainable aspects of gender transformation that focus on shifting social and cultural norms. The intervention is being replicated in Asia and elsewhere in Africa. The evaluation of Through Our Eyes dem-onstrates 50 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence a unique way to evaluate a project with little resources and considerable commu-nity involvement. It was conducted through focus group discussions during each video play-back session. The findings suggest an increase in women’s use of reproductive health services in target areas, and a reduction in stigma asso-ciated with discussing sexual violence and other matters related to women’s health and rights. They also suggest that the women felt more confident in articulating their concerns about IPV/SV and reproductive health, and pride in their new skills in making videotapes. (A series of formal participatory evaluations are being planned.) One Man Can (OMC) Campaign100 Country: South Africa Implementing organizations: Sonke Gender Justice The One Man Can Campaign, a partnership on HIV and gender violence in southern Africa, is a flagship initiative of the South African NGO Sonke Gender Justice (Sonke). Begun in 2006, it encourages and supports men and boys to take action to stop IPV/SV and to promote healthy, equitable relationships between men and women. OMC has been implemented in all of South Africa’s nine provinces as well as in several other southern African countries (in the latter, by partner organizations). By July 2007, through the implementation of 10 OMC projects, Sonke had trained 465 people in six provinces to implement OMC activities; had conducted two 4-day workshops for more than 2,000 people in six provinces; and had reached tens of thousands of people through commu-nity OMC partnerships. 98 Impact on actual incidence of IPV/SV is problematic to measure in the context of an intervention project, in any case, because such interventions typically encourage women who have kept their abuse secret to openly discuss their situations. 99 Information from www.c4c.org/eyes.html 100 Peacock, 2008.
  • 57. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 51 The OMC project interventions were devel-oped based on results from formative research that included literature reviews, surveys, and focus group discussions with survivors of vio-lence, faith-based leaders, and teachers and coaches. The surveys asked boys and men how they understood the problem of men’s violence against women and what they would be willing to do about it. Based on the findings, Sonke developed a kit to provide men with resources to act on their concerns about domestic and sexual vio-lence. This Action Kit includes such materials as stickers, clothing, posters, music, video clips, and fact sheets, and provides specific information and strategies on how men can support a survivor, use the law to demand jus-tice, educate children early and often, chal-lenge other men to take action, make schools safer for girls and boys, and raise awareness in churches, mosques, or synagogues. Sonke implements OMC workshops with groups of men in communities across South Africa and has provided training on the OMC Campaign to a broad range of key stakeholders including government departments at the national and provincial levels, traditional healers, faith-based leaders, the police, youth service organizations, in- and out-of-school youth, teachers, and other CBOs and NGOs. Groups of men and boys attend workshops and develop community teams to put the training into action. Phone surveys with a random sample of program participants and routine data collec-tion from government sources and NGOs were completed to evaluate a number of behavioral outcomes. Results showed positive results, with 91 percent of participants who had witnessed domestic violence reporting it to authorities (police, community structure, NGOs). Sixty-one percent of respondents also reported that they had increased their condom use after attending a workshop. Pre/post tests in connection with specific workshops suggested dramatic attitudinal changes. For example, pre/post test results from a workshop with members of a traditional court showed that before the workshop, 100 percent of the male respondents believed that they had the right, as men, to decide when to have sex with their female partners. This dropped to 25 percent after the workshop. In another case, 63 percent of participants from a local tribal authority said they believed that, under some circumstances, it is acceptable for men to beat their female partners. Post-workshop, 83 percent of respondents disagreed with this statement. Similarly, before the work-shop, 96 percent of the participants believed that they should not interfere in other people’s relationships even in cases of violence. After the workshop, all participants said they believed that they should interfere.
  • 58. Harmful Practices Case Study Intervention: Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra Country: India Type of Intervention: Life skills program Implementing Organizations: ICRW with Institute of Health Management, Pachod (IHMP) Gender-Related Barriers to RH In rural Maharashtra, there are few alterna-tives to marriage for young girls. Parents are reluctant to send girls to school because of safety concerns, and outside employment opportunities for women are very limited. In order to ensure a daughter will be taken care of in the future, parents are anxious to find a suitable husband. Her consent is often not taken, and she is often married to a much older man. This marriage arrangement cre-ates significant power imbalances between the girl and her husband, leaving her vulnera-ble to many harmful outcomes. For example, she may be unable to negotiate contraceptive use or she and her husband may not have access to appropriate information about fam-ily planning. Thus, early marriage often leads to early child bearing. The age difference also means that girls are at greater risk of HIV from their husbands, who may be more sex-ually experienced. Objective The intervention study sought to test the effectiveness of a life skills program in increasing girls’ self-esteem and literacy and delaying age at marriage in Maharashtra. Strategy The program specifically addressed gender-related barriers by trying to improve the social status of adolescent girls through increasing their skills related to gender, legal literacy, and team building. The life skills training approach recognizes that early mar-riage and poor sexual and reproductive health are closely linked with girls’ low self-esteem, social vulnerability, and limited life options. The program was implemented in multiple year-long phases, with one-hour education sessions held each weekday eve-ning. This case study focuses on the first implementation year completed in 1998 – 1999. It targeted unmarried adolescent girls ages 12 – 18, focusing on out-of-school and working girls. The sessions concentrated on improv-ing the girls’ skills and knowledge in the fol-lowing areas: Social Issues and Institutions, Local Bodies (i.e. local government and civil society structures), Life Skills, Child Health and Nutrition, and Health. One example of an activity in the life skills course is the edu-cation practicum, in which girls in the com-munity conduct an informal education course, such as teaching literacy skills to non-participating girls. Parents were engaged throughout the development of the program and implemen-tation of the intervention. IHMP organized 10 focus group discussions with mothers and their unmarried daughters in order to develop the program’s content. Once IHMP had devel-oped the curriculum, parents were given the opportunity to learn about it, give feedback, and participate in monthly meetings. 52 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Already established village develop-ment committees collaborated with IHMP to recruit and hire teachers for the life skills program. The teachers were required to have at least seven years of formal educa-tion (the same level required for the village-based anganwadi, workers in the State-operated Integrated Child Development Services) so the program could be replicated throughout the country if successful. Evaluation Design: Quasi-Experimental pretest-posttest control group design The study compared 17 intervention and 18 control villages, with a total of 1,146 partici-pants. Two noncontiguous primary health centers (PHC) were randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. Each PHC was broken down into smaller geo-graphical units, each with a population of 1,000 – 1,500, with 17 and 18 units making up the intervention and control groups respectively. The girls were grouped accord-ing to their level of participation in the pro-gram, and ranged from not attending to fully attending. Teachers tracked the participants for one year following completion of the life skills course, noting who married within that year.
  • 59. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 53 Table 5.4 Reproductive Health Outcomes Comparing only the girls who participated fully in the life skills program and a ran-domly selected group from the control area, logistic regression analysis indicates that the control group was four times more likely to marry before 18 than the group who fully participated. From the study sample, nine percent of the girls who completed the course were married before the age of 18 years, com-pared to almost 30 percent of the girls who never attended. Logistic regression shows that, controlling for background characteris-tics, girls who never attended the course were more than two-and-a-half times as likely to get married before age 18 com-pared to girls who completed the course. These findings show that the program significantly delayed marriage of both pro-gram participants and nonparticipants in the intervention areas as a whole. The median age at marriage rose from 16 to 17 years from 1997–2001, and the proportion of marriages to girls younger than 18 dropped from 81 percent to 62 percent. There was no significant change in the control group. Gender Outcomes Qualitative interviews suggested that after attending the life skills course, girls acted more confidently and autonomously. They influenced household decisions, including decisions regarding their own marriage, spoke without hesitation or fear, demon-strated more self-discipline, and were more independent in daily activities. A pre- and post-test of the life skills course showed that while the intervention and control group had similar pre-test scores, only the inter-vention group exhibited significant changes, with correct answers increasing by 1.5 to 3.0 times. Scale-up By the end of the study, the state govern-ment of Maharashtra had adapted and scaled up IHMP’s life skills model for rural Maharashtra. Conclusions The evaluation suggests that the life skills program provided the girls with skills and knowledge that increased their confidence and helped them to become more involved in household decisions, including decisions regarding their own marriage. Inclusion of parents in developing program content and implementation helped to achieve broad community support, evidenced by delayed marriages occurring within the whole inter-vention area, not just among program par-ticipants. References R. Pande, K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. Macquarrie, and S. Jain, Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in India: Evidence of Effectiveness and Costs from Community-based Interventions. Final Report of the Adolescent Reproductive Health Program in India (New Delhi: ICRW, 2006). Reproductive Health Outcomes Attendance # of girls % married < 18 yrs Adjusted OR+ Complete 166 9.1 1 (reference) Partial 243 22.6 2.42* None 737 29.3 2.58* N=1146; *p<0.05; +Adjusted for girls’ age, current schooling status, education, SES, family type, mother’s education, parents’ occupation Source: ICRW, Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra.
  • 60. Gender-Related Barriers to RH Female genital cutting (FGC)101 is a common practice throughout Senegal. The practice of FGC is perpetuated by the belief that it is a rite of passage to womanhood and neces-sary for suitable marriage prospects. Because of these factors, mothers often believe they are acting in their daughters’ best interests. Because it is culturally expected for women to undergo FGC, it may be difficult for individuals to stand up to this social norm. Objective Tostan’s goal was to help communities, especially women, improve living and health conditions, and to mobilize villages to hold public declarations supporting the abandon-ment of harmful practices, particularly FGC and child marriage. Strategy Tostan seeks to empower people to make informed decisions for the benefit of their personal and community development. The educational program includes modules on human rights, problem solving, environmen-tal hygiene, and women’s health. Through participatory educational methods for com-munication of technical information, discus-sion of human rights issues, and development of strategies for social trans-formation, the NGO hopes to improve the confidence and self-determination of women. Implementation of the program typi-cally follows six phases over the course of 18-24 months. In the first, a village sets up a committee to adapt and manage the pro-gram. In the second phase, about 30 partici-pants in each village receive training and Prevalence of FGC Among Daughters of Participants Participants in intervention area 87% n = 550 84% n=340 79%* n=353 Non-participants in intervention area 85% n=213 78%* n=199 Comparison Group 93% n = 272 -- 89% n = 232 * Statistically significant at p<0.05 education courses three times a week for two hours each covering hygiene, women’s health, human rights, and problem-solving. Training emphasizes enabling participants to analyze their own situation and find the best solution. In the third and fourth phases, trainees share what they are learning with others, and the group begins to organize public discussions around issues identified by the trainees. Participants serve as dis-cussion leaders and facilitate a process of community consensus-building in renounc-ing FGC. In the fifth phase, community members reach out and spread educational activities to neighboring villages. Finally, a group of villages organizes a public declara-tion to indicate their collective intention to renounce harmful practices Evaluation Design: Quasi-experimental case-control design A quasi-experimental control design was used to evaluate differences between men and women in 20 intervention and 20 con-trol villages. At baseline, 576 women, 373 men, and 895 daughters were surveyed in the intervention villages. In the control vil-lages, 199 women, 184 men, and 396 daughters were surveyed. 54 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Baseline Post-intervention Endline In the intervention villages, a survey was administered to both participants and non-participants (immediately before the intervention at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and two years after the intervention/endline). Those living in the control villages were interviewed twice, at baseline and endline. In addition, qualitative data were collected to gauge the community mobilization process and people’s percep-tions, attitudes, and behaviors. Reproductive Health Outcomes The prevalence of FGC among daughters at baseline was 87 percent and 93 percent for the intervention and control groups, respec-tively. By the endline, FGC prevalence among daughters of women in the interven-tion group had significantly declined. No significant change could be seen in the comparison group (see table. 5.5). The proportion of women who thought FGC was necessary significantly declined in the intervention group. A decrease was also Harmful Practices Case Study Intervention: Tostan Community-Based Education Program Country: Senegal Type of Intervention: Community engagement and education program Implementing Organizations: Tostan; evaluation by Population Council. Table 5.5 101 While USAID and many NGOs and donors refer to this practice as female genital mutilation/cutting or FGM/C, Tostan pre-fers to use what it considers the non-pejo-rative term of FGC, female genital cutting.
  • 61. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 55 Table 5.6 found in the control group; however, the dif-ference in this change was less than in the intervention group (see table above). Awareness of at least two conse-quences of FGC significantly increased among men (from 11 to 83 percent) and women (from 7 to 83 percent) immediately after participating in the program, although it declined somewhat (to 66 percent for men and 70 percent for women) by the time of the endline survey. Among the majority of women partici-pating in the program who disapproved of FGC at the endline, 85 percent said that they had changed their mind after the Tostan program and 10 percent said their disap-proval dated back several years. In addition to FGC, the evaluation showed a wide range of positive RH out-comes including: • Significant declines in women’s per-sonal experience of violence during the last 12 months in both the intervention and comparison group (the intervention group declined significantly more than the comparison group); • Significant increase in knowledge of contraceptive methods by men and women in the intervention group; • Significant increase in awareness of STIs at endline by women participants and nonparticipants in the intervention villages (no increase was observed in the comparison group), and a signifi-cant increase in men who knew at least two kinds of STIs compared to the comparison group. Gender Outcomes After the intervention, there was a signifi-cant increase among women in the interven-tion groups who agreed with the statement that “girls ought to go to school” and agreed that women’s unions had a role in demanding rights. Levels were sustained through to the endline. The comparison group also revealed similar significant trends. Partner approval of contraceptive use, as perceived by the women, improved sig-nificantly in the intervention group. These levels were maintained at endline. Discussion with partners about family plan-ning was higher among the participants (30 percent) than among the non-participants (17 percent). Limitations The evaluation showed improvements in a number of the measured RH outcomes in both the intervention and the comparison villages. For example, awareness of gender-based violence reached the same level of improvement in the comparison villages as in the intervention villages. This could be a result of changing social factors in the com-munity, as well as contamination because Tostan radio programs were broadcast throughout the region. Conclusions Knowledge about FGC issues among both men and women increased significantly dur-ing the study period. Those who participated in the education program increased their knowledge more than others living within the villages. Most disapproved of FGC and declared that they had no intention of cut-ting their daughters in the future. The same tendency was observed in the comparison group, but to a lesser extent, suggesting that there is a widespread shift in attitude, which this program may have accelerated in the intervention villages. Levels of awareness of family planning, pregnancy surveillance, child health, and STI/HIV issues increased after the program, and comparisons show a statistically signifi-cant increase by the intervention group over the comparison group for all but one health indicator. References N.J. Diop, M.M. Faye, A. Moreau, J. Cabral, H. Benga, F. Cisse, B. Mane, I. Baumgarten, and M. Melching. The Tostan Program: Evaluation of a Community Based Education Program in Senegal (New York: Population Council: 2004). Proportion of Women Who Thought FGC Was a Necessity Baseline Post-intervention Endline Participants 70% n = 550 21% 15% Non-participants 33% 29% Comparison Group 88% n = 272 -- 61%
  • 62. Harmful Practices Case Study Intervention: Intervention with Microfinance for AIDS and Gender Equity (IMAGE) Country: South Africa Type of Intervention: Cross-sectoral Implementing Organizations: Small Enterprise Foundation (SEF) Gender-Related Barriers to RH Intimate partner violence/sexual violence (IPV/SV) is highly prevalent across sub- Saharan Africa. Women living in poverty are more likely to suffer from violence. Evidence points to a link between violence and HIV/ AIDS status. In the Limpopo Province, acceptance by women of their husband’s extra-marital affairs is commonplace. Women often tolerate these behaviors from their husbands because they are the main income earners in the family and, therefore, have a position of authority in the house-hold. Additionally, men and women may have internalized norms that perpetuate male control and acceptance of violence. Objective The IMAGE project, implemented from 2001 – 2005, sought to increase women’s empowerment through micro-lending, gen-der awareness, and HIV training, and to decrease women’s experience of IPV/SV. Strategy Women (ages 18 and older) who lived in the poorest households in each village were selected as participants using SEF’s partici-patory wealth-ranking criteria. The interven-tion included two strategies: a micro-lending program and a gender-focused training component called “Sisters for Life.” Microfinance Program. The IMAGE micro-lending program followed the Grameen model, and supported women’s new and existing business ventures. In this model, groups of five women acted as each other’s benefactor, and all women in the group had to repay their loans in order to move up to the next credit level. Women met every two weeks to repay their loans, apply for credit, and discuss their business plans. Sisters for Life Program. The gender aware-ness and HIV-training component was imple-mented in two phases alongside the microfinance program. Phase one consisted of 10 one-hour sessions on gender roles, cultural beliefs, relationships, communica-tion, domestic violence, and HIV infection, with the goal of strengthening communica-tion skills, critical thinking, and leadership. In phase two, women who were identified by their loan centers as “natural leaders” received additional training on leadership and community mobilization to lead initiatives in their own families and communities. Based on participatory learning and action (PLA) principles, phase two was an open-ended program that encouraged broad community mobilization to engage men and boys. Evaluation Design: Cluster randomized-control trial During the recruitment period of the evalua-tion, 430 loan recipients and 430 matched control participants were enrolled. The multi-level evaluation was designed to mea-sure changes at the individual, household, and community level. Matched villages were randomly assigned to receive the interven-tion either at the beginning or the end of the evaluation period. Participatory wealth rank-ing was used to form matched experimental and control groups based on age and pov-erty level. Reproductive health data were collected, including sexual behavior and HIV status. Gender outcomes investigated included economic and social benefits, intra-household communication, decision-making, and gender relations. Nine empowerment indicators relevant to South Africa were used. Seven focus group discussions supplemented the quanti-tative data. 56 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Researchers measured women’s expe-rience of IPV/SV during the past year, as well as two secondary outcomes, including experience of controlling behavior from partners and attitudes toward the accept-ability of IPV/SV. Reproductive Health Outcomes Results showed that experience of IPV/SV in the past year decreased by half in the inter-vention villages. An analysis of trends showed a consistent decrease in IPV/SV over time for all four intervention villages, whereas IPV/SV remained constant or increased in the control villages. The study also showed that, compared to the control group, at endline women in the intervention group reported less controlling behavior from their partners and less accepting atti-tudes toward violence. For the intervention group, there was not a substantial decrease from baseline to endline in experiencing controlling behavior (see table 5.7). Gender Outcomes The intervention measured a number of gender outcomes, including effects on eco-nomic well-being and empowerment. Participants in the intervention group reported increased assets, expenditures, and membership in savings groups. Participation in the intervention was associated with greater self-confidence and financial confidence, more progressive atti-tudes toward gender norms, increased autonomy in decisionmaking, greater part-ner appreciation of their household contri-bution, improved household communication, better partner relationships, and higher levels of participation in social groups and collective action (see table 5.8).
  • 63. Table 5.7 Baseline Follow-up (2 years after baseline) Intervention (%) Control (%) Intervention (%) Control (%) Intimate partner violence Experience of past year IPV/SV 11.4 9.0 5.9 12.01 Progressive attitudes to IPV/SV … … 52.4 35.5 Experienced controlling behavior by partner 34.7 22.5 33.7 41.7 Source: Kim et al., 2007: 1974-1802. Harmful Practices: Barriers to Reproductive Health 57 Table 5.8 RH Outcomes Limitations Research has shown that women often underreport experiencing IPV/SV due to its sensitive and stigmatized nature. Willingness to disclose often increases as awareness increases of IPV/SV definitions and its prevalence. This reporting bias may have underestimated the impact of the inter-vention on IPV/SV. Scale-up The IMAGE project is currently being scaled-up in partnership with AngloPlatinum Mines in 150 villages. Conclusions The evaluation found women’s risk of physi-cal or sexual violence was reduced by more than half following the intervention, and improvements were shown in all nine dimen-sions of women’s empowerment measured in the study. The research team attributes these results to women’s enhanced ability to chal-lenge the acceptability of violence, their expectation of better treatment from male partners, their willingness to leave abusive relationships, and heightened public aware-ness about intimate partner violence. This intervention is noteworthy for com-bining development and health interventions to achieve reductions in IPV/SV. Achieving a strong partnership between the microfinance institute and HIV/AIDS prevention organiza-tion was key to the successful implementa-tion of this cross-sectoral intervention. References P.M. Pronyk, J.C. Kim, J.R. Hargreaves, M.B. Makhubele, L.A. Morison, C. Watts, and J.D.H. Porter, “Microfinance and HIV Prevention: Emerging Lessons from Rural South Africa,” in Small Enterprise Development 16, no.3(2005): 26-38. J.C. Kim, C.H. Watts, J.R. Hargreaves, L.X. Hdhlovu, G. Phetla, L.A. Morison, J. Busza, J.D.H. Proter, and P. Pronyk, “Understanding the Impact of a Microfinance-Based Intervention on Women's Empowerment and the Reduction of Intimate Partner Violence in South Africa,” in American Journal of Public Health 97, no.10(2007): 1974-1802. Gender Outcomes Baseline Follow-up Intervention group Empowerment Greater financial confidence 45.5 72.0 Challenging gender norms 37.4 61.2 Autonomy in decisionmaking 27.7 57.1 Taking part in collective action 41.0 75.7 Economic well-being Estimated household asset value > 2000 rand 48.2 58.2 Savings group membership 24.5 36.2
  • 64. Meeting the Needs of Youth Nearly half of the world’s population is below the age of 25, including an estimated 1.2 bil-lion adolescents ages 10-19, and most of those young people live in developing countries.102 Adolescence is a time of transition from child-hood to adulthood and, as such, is a critical time to provide young people with the knowledge and skills they need to ensure a lifetime of good sex-ual and reproductive health. Adolescents, and particularly adolescent girls, face a range of reproductive health risks once they become sex-ually active, including STIs, HIV/AIDS, and unin-tended pregnancy. Pregnancy is the leading cause of death for young women ages 15 to 19 worldwide, with complications of childbirth and unsafe abortion leading the list.103 In 2007, an estimated 5.4 million young people (ages 15-24) were infected with HIV. Prevalence was highest in sub-Saharan Africa, where 90 percent of HIV-positive children live; young women in the region have rates that are even higher than those of young men.104 6 Program Country African Youth Alliance Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda Guria Adolescent Health Project Georgia Transitions to Adulthood - Adolescent Livelihoods India Training Transitions to Adulthood - Tap and Reposition Youth Kenya New Visions Egypt CASE STUDY: Ishraq Egypt CASE STUDY: First-time Parents India Gender and sexual norms are established early105 and dictate such things as when and with whom to have sex, and whether to use protection. Gender norms related to sex can have detrimental effects on men as well as women, particularly for STIs and HIV and for risk of violence.106 Waiting to have sex, known as “delaying sexual debut,” can reduce the number of sexual partners and, therefore, reduce the risk of con-tracting HIV.107 Opinions vary on what are the appropriate programs for adolescents, ranging from teaching abstinence-only until marriage to providing comprehensive sex education (including means of protection from pregnancy and disease). Evidence has been available for quite some time that in countries with strong youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services, the incidences of teenage pregnancy, abortion, and STIs are consistently much lower than in countries where these services are not available.108 Interventions The seven interventions highlighted here focused on addressing gender norms, providing information, and building skills related to SRH. Readers should note that several of the inter-ventions in other chapters of this publication (particularly in Chapter 4, Reducing HIV/AIDS) are relevant to young people, risky behaviors, and negative health outcomes. All seven interventions undertook gender transformative approaches, in whole or in part. Four sought to improve adolescent reproductive health by promoting gender equitable norms. The two projects selected as case studies were Ishraq (enlightenment) in Egypt and the First-time Parents in India. Ishraq focused on devel-opment of life skills and opportunities for girls, while the First-time Parents sought to reach 102 UN Population Division, 2008. 103 WHO, 2004. 104 See Children and HIV and AIDS at www.unicef.org/aids/. See also UNAIDS, 2007. 105 Eggleston, Jackson, and Hardee, 1999; Blakemore, 2003 106 See Pulerwitz, Barker, and Nascimento, 2006. 107 Pettifor et al., 2004 , in Gay et al., 2005. 108 Grunseit, 1997. 5588 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 65. young married women with RH information and services, empowering them to address their own needs (see p. X). Table 6.1 lists the strategies employed by these programs to meet the needs of youth. The African Youth Alliance (AYA)109 Country: Uganda, Tanzania, Ghana, and Botswana Implementing organizations: PATH, Pathfinder International, and UNFPA with funding by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Evaluation by JSI. The AYA project was designed to be an “inno-vative, collaborative and comprehensive pre-vention program” for improving adolescent (ages 10-24) sexual and reproductive health in four African counties.110 The intervention had six components: policy and advocacy coordina-tion; institutional capacity building; coordina-tion and dissemination; BCC, including life planning skills; youth friendly services; and integration of adolescent sexual and reproduc-tive health with livelihood skills training. There were three cross-cutting themes: gender; part-nerships; and active participation of youth. AYA program materials note that, “Gender-sensitive approaches are applied at different levels to challenge gender biases that exist at multiple levels and maintain unequal status, access, and life experience for males and females.”111 John Snow, Inc. (JSI) evaluated the AYA project in three of the four countries (Uganda, Tanzania, and Ghana) using a post-intervention analysis to ascertain the impact of exposure to AYA’s comprehensive integrated program on sexual and reproductive health behavior among youth. The evaluation compared knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral outcomes between intervention and control sites and youth who were and were not exposed to the AYA inter-vention. The evaluation did not measure any gender outcomes. The analysis used two ana-lytic techniques for measuring impact using data collected at one point in time (cross-sec-tional Table 6.1 Strategies to Meet the Needs of Youth Employ comprehensive approach addressing policy, community and individual levels Address structural issues and underlying factors affecting poor RH, including gender inequity Address notions of gender through community theater Empower rural, out-of-school girls and work with young males to promote life skills, including RH and gender equity Improve women’s economic prospects through livelihoods and microcredit (integrated with RH) Empower young married women with RH information and services Perform gender analysis throughout project development and implementation data): propensity score matching and instrumental variable regression. The evalua-tion found that AYA positively impacted a num-ber of variables, including contraceptive and condom use, partner reduction, and several self-efficacy and knowledge antecedents to behavior change. Areas in which there was lit-tle evidence of impact included delay of sexual debut and abstinence among females and males, and partner reduction among males. The impact of AYA was greater on young women than on young men. The evaluation concluded that AYA program approaches need to be refined to better reach young men. Guria Adolescent Health Project (GAHP)112 Country: Georgia Implementing organizations: CARE This project was implemented in the Guria region of Georgia as part of a wider effort by USAID and CARE to strengthen underlying causes of poor family planning/reproductive health (FP/RH) in order to yield sustainable health outcomes. The Guria project used an inter-generational approach to “influence social, cultural and gender norms and inequali-ties [to] improve promotion of reproductive health rights and responsibilities of adults and adolescents.”113 This meant working with par-ents on how to involve adolescents in designing and implementing a program on sexual and reproductive health for young people. Meeting the Needs of Youth 59 109 African Youth Alliance, 2008; see also Williams et al., 2007. 110 See www.jsi.com/Managed/Docs/Publications/Evaluation/ aya_evaluation_uganda.pdf, accessed online Dec. 1, 2009. 111 AYA, 2008. 112 CARE, 2005; CARE 2007. 113 CARE, 2007, p. iii.
  • 66. Components of the project included the use of youth and adult change agents; promotion of health education and social marketing; and implementation of micro-grants and youth-friendly services. This project was evaluated using baseline and endline surveys as well as through qualita-tive methods and document review. The evalu-ation found impressive changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in support of access to family planning information and services. The percentage of young women and men aware that it is possible to prevent unwanted preg-nancy nearly doubled from 50 percent to 93 percent. Knowledge of contraception also improved, with young people knowing about more methods and more effective methods. The evaluation also found more support for adolescent rights, including protection of girls from kidnapping. The project promoted increased discussion of gender topics, most notably masculinity. Transitions to Adulthood— Adolescent Livelihoods Training114 Country: India Implementing organizations: Population Council and CARE/India This project integrated a livelihoods component into an existing reproductive health project that had been serving adolescent girls and boys in the slums of Allahabad, India for years.The aim was to expand girls’ decisionmaking power through building and strengthening social net-works and developing financial and income-gen-erating capabilities. The livelihoods approach sought to provide skills to transform the ways girls perceive themselves and are perceived within their communities. Peer educators recruited adolescent girls to participate in the program. Girls in the experimental and control areas received information on RH; in the experi-mental areas girls also received vocational coun-seling, information on savings accounts, and follow-up support from a peer educator. The evaluation, conducted by the Population Council and the Centre for Operations Research and Training (CORT), used a pre- and post-test design, with baseline surveys of adolescents and one of their parents. It found that, as a result of the intervention, girls in the experimental areas were more likely to be members of a group and to know where unmarried women could safely congregate. These girls also scored higher on measures of social skills and self-esteem and knowledge of reproductive health. The project did not have an appreciable effect on gender role attitudes, girls’ mobility, girls’ expectations for work, or how the girls used their time. The evaluation of the livelihoods compo-nent noted that, while such a short-term proj-ect can raise awareness and change attitudes, it cannot be expected to change the structure of opportunities available for girls. It concluded that, in order to reduce deeply entrenched gen-der disparities that exist and enhance girls’ ability to have a greater voice in influencing their lives, future programs should include more contact with the girls and stronger efforts to develop group cohesion and to improve the communication, negotiation, and decision-mak-ing skills of adolescent girls. Since this evalua-tion, CARE-India has incorporated the livelihoods approach into its ongoing adoles-cent 60 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence programs in India. Transitions to Adulthood— Tap and Reposition Youth (TRY)115 Country: Kenya Implementing organizations: Population Council with K-Rep Development Agency (KDA). This savings and microcredit project, which also focused on gender attitudes, targeted out-of- school adolescent girls and young women in low-income and slum areas of Nairobi, Kenya. The objective was to improve adolescents’ live-lihood options as a way to reduce vulnerabili-ties to adverse social and reproductive health outcomes. The TRY model included group-based micro-finance, such as integrated sav-ings, credit, business support, and mentoring. The project was implemented first as a pilot project (1998–2000) and was then scaled-up and evaluated from 2001–2004. The evaluation was a quasi-experimental, pre- and post-test design, with surveys con-ducted at baseline and at the conclusion of the project. In total, 326 participants and their 114 Sebastian, Grant, and Mensch, 2005. 115 Erulkar and Chong, 2005.
  • 67. Meeting the Needs of Youth 61 matched controls were interviewed at baseline, and 222 pairs were interviewed again at endline. Compared to the control group, TRY partici-pants had significantly higher levels of income and household assets. TRY participants who saved, compared to control group savers, had significantly higher savings. TRY participants also shifted to more equitable gender attitudes. Their RH knowledge was not significantly higher, although the TRY participants had some-what greater ability to refuse sex and insist on condom use. At endline, TRY participants and controls held similar views on five of the eight issues, while TRY girls were significantly more liberal on three issues: that wives should be able to refuse sex, that marriage is not the best option for an unschooled girl, and that it is not necessary to have a husband in order to be happy. A score was calculated using responses to the gender attitude statements, with a maximum possible score of eight. At baseline, the aggregate gender score for controls was significantly greater than the TRY girls. At endline, however, TRY girls had marginally greater gender attitude scores at the level of p<0.1, suggesting the proj-ect may have had an impact on participants’ gender attitudes. The intervention faced challenges in meet-ing the diverse needs of different groups of ado-lescent girls. A significant number of participants, particularly younger adolescents, dropped out of the program. The experience from TRY suggests that rigorous micro-finance models may be an appropriate intervention to improve young girls’ economic opportunities and reproductive health outcomes for older and less vulnerable girls. For this subset of girls, the model appeared to be effective in improving girls’ status on a range of economic indicators. New Visions116 Country: Egypt Implementing organizations: CEDPA and 216 local organizations In a survey carried out by CEDPA, 36 percent of young Egyptian males ages 12–20 could not name one mode of transmission for HIV/AIDS. According to a national survey, one out of three married women have been abused, and more than half of young boys thought a man was jus-tified in beating his wife in certain circum-stances. In response to this data, New Visions was designed to encourage the development of life skills and to increase gender sensitivity and RH knowledge among boys and young men ages 12-20 in order to ultimately improve outcomes for girls and women. The New Visions course consisted of 64 ses-sions, each 1 ½ to 2-hours long, over a six-month period, facilitated by young college graduates. The curriculum contained messages related to gender equity, partnership with women, responsibilities to self, family and com-munity, and civil and human rights. Skills development included anger management, planning, negotiation, communication, and decisionmaking. The evaluation compared pre-and post-test responses of 1,477 New Visions participants. Outcome measures consisted of 12 scales based on the subjects’ reported knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in: gender-equity attitudes, gender roles attitudes, gender-based violence attitudes, domestic violence attitudes, female genital mutilation/cutting atti-tudes, RH knowledge, HIV knowledge, male roles and MCH/FP attitudes, substance-related behavior, self-confidence, decisionmaking, and environmental behaviors. Results showed that exposure to the pro-gram was a highly statistically significant pre-dictor of better RH knowledge and attitudes outcome scores. There were significant changes in knowledge of a source of family planning and knowledge about HIV. At endline, only 11 per-cent of boys could not name one mode of HIV transmission, compared with 36 percent at baseline. Significant positive shifts were recorded in attitudes toward male-female inter-action, female genital mutilation, and gender-based violence. Respondents’ views on shared responsibility between men and women in fam-ily decisionmaking, community service, politi-cal participation, and household duties all improved; participants were more likely than at baseline to support equitable treatment for boys and girls regarding attire, work, and age of marriage. By engaging young men, who are often the gatekeepers to improving young girls’ health, the intervention was successful in improving RH and gender outcomes for both girls and boys. 116 CEDPA, 2005.
  • 68. Youth Case Study Intervention: Ishraq (“Enlightenment”) Country: Egypt Type of Intervention: Nonformal education Implementing Organizations: Save the Children, Population Council, the Egyptian-NGO CARITAS, and CEDPA Gender-Related Barriers to RH Adolescent girls in Upper Egypt face many barriers to leading healthy and productive lives, including discrimination and social isolation. Twenty-six percent of girls ages 13–19 in rural Upper Egypt have received two years or less of schooling. Community norms limit adolescent girls’ mobility and decisionmaking. Girls do not have access to safe meeting places outside the home and remain closely supervised until a husband is chosen for them. Early arranged marriages often lead to early childbearing and succes-sive pregnancies, perpetuating the cycle of isolation, illiteracy, and poverty into the next generation. Objective The Ishraq project aims to improve the life opportunities of rural out-of-school girls, 13-15 years of age, in four villages in Minya Governorate. The project’s objectives are to improve literacy, recreational opportunities, livelihood skills, health practices, and mobil-ity; to influence policies and social norms regarding girls’ life opportunities; and to promote support for girls’ education. Strategy The three-year pilot initiative was carried out from 2001 – 2004. Prior to implementing the Ishraq intervention, the project identified community stakeholders and the necessary community structure in which to implement the project. Women “promoters” or interme-diaries were identified who would help the girls gain access to public spaces. Village committees were formed, composed of a broad range of stakeholders, who helped to support recruitment and program activities. To recruit adolescent girls to the pro-gram, Ishraq followed four strategies: word of mouth, public announcements, parents’ meetings, and home visits by promoters. The home visits played a critical role in increasing parents’ understanding of and comfort level with the program and, thus, allowing their daughters to participate. The Ishraq project consisted of four main components: 1) Twice-weekly literacy classes for 24 months that utilized the Caritas Learn to be Free curriculum as well as a core curriculum of Arabic and mathematics. The course also helped to prepare girls to sit for the national education entrance exam; 2) CEDPA’s New Horizons life skills program that presented reproductive health informa-tion and basic life skills—girls attended two 90-minute sessions each week for 12 months; 3) A sports and physical activity curriculum developed by Population Council to encour-age fun in a safe environment, develop social networks, and improve girls’ self-con-fidence. This was implemented in two phases, with the first introducing girls to traditional games (three months) and the second phase teaching table tennis and one team sport (10 months). The girls attended two 90-minute sessions each week; 4) A home skills and livelihoods training pro-gram instructed girls on basic domestic skills as well as a choice of vocational skills devel-opment, including electrical appliance man-agement and repair, hairdressing (the most popular option), and sweets production. 62 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Evaluation Design: Quasi-experimental design The evaluation compared the Ishraq partici-pants with a matched control group of ado-lescent girls. A household census was used to iden-tify eligible girls ages 13 to 15. A baseline survey was administered using a structured, individual questionnaire before the program was implemented. A mid-point survey was completed of girls who had joined the pro-gram at a later date, and an endline survey was completed of all baseline and midpoint respondents. In total there were 587 respondents. In addition, focus group discussions and unstructured interviews were used to monitor the changes taking place in girls, the promoters, and families. Reproductive Health Outcomes One clear impact was a decline in support for FGM/C among girls who had participated in the program for a year. Evaluation results showed a significant decline (from 71% to 18%) in percent of Ishraq girls who intend to circumcise their daughters in the future compared with the control group. One per-cent of program participants compared with 76 percent of nonparticipants said they believed FGM/C was necessary. Girls who lived in the intervention villages but did not participate in the program showed a greater, though statistically insignificant, decline in support for FGM/C than the control village. This suggests that knowledge and attitudes may be shifting through peer networks. Differences in attitudes toward violence at endline were statistically significant: 64 percent of program participants compared
  • 69. Meeting the Needs of Youth 63 Mean Scores on the Gender Role Attitudes Index, Baseline and Endline Surveys 10 8 6 4 2 to 93 percent of the control group believed that a girl should be beaten if she disobeys her brother. The proportion of girls preferring to marry before the age of 18 dropped sub-stantially among all groups, intervention and control. The longer the exposure to Ishraq, the greater the decline in the proportion of girls preferring marriage before age 18. Paired comparisons did not show significant results. Gender Outcomes The evaluation included questions on atti-tudes toward gender roles. Results show that respondents participating in the pro-gram for more than one year developed more gender-equitable attitudes. Limitations The final evaluation of the project was car-ried out four months after its completion. A long-term assessment may be more suc-cessful in capturing the full impact of the intervention, as girls reach important transi-tions in their lives, including marriage and childbearing, and become decisionmakers in their households. Conclusions The Ishraq program integrated various approaches to improve the health and well-being of adolescent girls in rural Upper Egypt. One key contribution of the interven-tion study is to show how addressing harm-ful gender norms, which often dictate how a girl is to behave and the opportunities avail-able to her, can lead to positive health and gender outcomes. The findings indicate that the project was successful in program areas and among program participants in obtain-ing space in which girls could safely meet, increasing literacy, increasing support among girls for later age at marriage and for a say in choosing their husbands, reducing support for FGM/C, and increasing feelings of self-confidence. Through participation in Ishraq activities, parents adopted increas-ingly progressive views related to girls’ roles, rights, and capabilities. References Ishraq: Safe Places for Out-of -School Adolescent Girls to Learn, Play and Grow. Empowering Rural Girls in Egypt (Westport, CT: Save the Children, 2004). M. Brady, R. Assaad, B. Ibrahim, A. Salem, R. Salem, and N. Zibani. Providing New Opportunities to Adolescent Girls in Socially Conservative Settings: The Ishraq Program in Rural Upper Egypt. Full Report (New York: Population Council, 2007). 0 Control villages (N=130) None (N=71) 12 months (N=110) 13-29 months* (N=50) Full participation* Mean Score Level of participation in Ishraq Baseline Endline Figure 6.1 * Significant at p=0.001 Source: Brady et al., 2007.
  • 70. Youth Case Study Intervention: First-time Parents Country: India Type of Intervention: Counseling, support, and peer groups Implementing Organizations: Population Council in partnership with the Child in Need Institute of West Bengal and the Deepak Charitable Trust in Gujarat Gender-Related Barriers to RH Recently married adolescent girls in India face one of the most vulnerable periods of their lives, including increased restrictions on their mobility and decision-making capa-bilities and social isolation. They are often not empowered enough to make decisions for themselves that will lead to positive out-comes. These girls are also often under pressure to conceive soon after marriage, even though the risks of early childbearing are well known. While these young married girls are now sexually active, they are often unable to negotiate sex with their husbands. Objective This project aimed to develop and test an integrated package of health and social interventions to improve young married women's reproductive and sexual health knowledge and practices, and to expand their ability to act in their own interests. Strategy The intervention, carried out from January 2003 – December 2004, focused on young women who were newly married, pregnant, or first-time postpartum in Diamond Harbour Block in West Bengal and Vadodara Block in Gujarat. Husbands of these young women, senior family members, and health care providers were also included. The inter-vention consisted of three components: information provision; healthcare service adjustments; and group formation. Female and male outreach workers provided RH information to 2,305 young married women and 1,481 of their husbands through home visits. Husbands were reached by male outreach workers and by participation in discussions in neighborhood meetings. Senior family members were reached in a more ad hoc manner when opportunities arose. Topics included prevention of repro-ductive tract infections; contraception; sex as a voluntary, safe, and pleasurable experi-ence; planning for delivery of the first birth; care during pregnancy and postpartum; breastfeeding; ways for husbands to sup-port wives during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period; and the importance of communication, respect, and joint deci-sionmaking between husband and wife. The project worked closely with health care providers to educate them on the spe-cial needs of young, newly married couples and first-time parents. The project supplied safe delivery kits and refresher-training courses for traditional birth attendants and provided transportation for couples to health services. The project also formed groups of 8-12 young women who met for 2-3 hours each 64 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence month. The meetings gave girls the oppor-tunity to interact with peers and mentors, exposing the young women to new ideas and increasing their self-confidence to com-municate and act in their own interests. The girls identified topics to focus on, including legal literacy, vocational skills, pregnancy and postpartum care, gender dynamics within and outside the family, relationship issues, and nutrition. Evaluation Design: Quasi-experimental study design Pre- and post-intervention surveys were administered to young women in both the intervention and control sites. In total, 2,862 and 4,555 women were interviewed at base-line and endline, respectively. Data were col-lected on topics such as young women's agency and social networks, reproductive health knowledge and practices, and partner support and communication. Reproductive Health Outcomes The intervention had significant, positive effects on girls’ autonomy, RH knowledge and practice, and couple relationships. RH knowledge and practices improved significantly among program participants in both intervention sites. After controlling for potentially confounding effects, young women who were exposed to the interven-
  • 71. Meeting the Needs of Youth 65 tion in Diamond Harbour were significantly more likely to have had comprehensive antenatal check-ups. The intervention group saw a 62 percent increase in those who made delivery preparations, as opposed to only a 40 percent increase in the control group. In the experimental group, the pro-portion that had a postpartum check-up increased by 40 percent, while there was only minimal increase in the proportion seeking postpartum care among controls. Women exposed to the intervention were also significantly more likely to have breast-fed their babies immediately after birth and fed their babies colostrum when compared to the control. In Vadodara, participation had a significant, positive net effect on rou-tine postpartum check-ups and use of con-traceptives for delaying the first birth. In both sites, young women who par-ticipated in the intervention were more likely to have discussed contraceptive use and timing of first pregnancy with their hus-bands, although the net effect was statisti-cally significant only in Vadodara. Gender Outcomes The intervention had significant effects on partner communication. Young married women from both sites who participated in the intervention had significantly greater say in household decision-making than young married women in control villages. They were also more likely to discuss contracep-tive use and timing of first pregnancy with their husbands. Young women in Diamond Harbour were more likely than women in the control villages to express their opinion when they disagreed with their husbands. In some sites, young married women who were exposed to the intervention had more mobility and were more likely to adhere to more equitable gender norm attitudes. Limitations The study faced numerous limitations to its research design. First, there were a number of differences between the intervention and control villages (e.g. programmatic activities and socio-demographic characteristics of young married girls) that limit their compa-rability. Comparison of background charac-teristics also show that self-selection into intervention activities did occur. Additionally, many of the young women were lost at fol-low- up due to their frequent movement between natal and marital homes. Conclusions Young married girls face many gender barri-ers that limit their capacity to act in ways and make decisions that are in their own interest. The First-time Parents project sought to address these barriers by empow-ering women with knowledge, reducing their social isolation, and making healthcare ser-vices more youth-friendly. The intervention was successful in producing positive repro-ductive health and gender outcomes, includ-ing health practices and spousal communication. References K.G. Santhya and N. Haberland, Empowering Young Mothers in India: Results of the First-time Parents Project (New York: Population Council, 2007). K.G. Santhya, N. Haberland, A. Das et al., Empowering Married Young Women and Improving Their Sexual and Reproductive Health: Effects of the First-time Parents Project (New Delhi: Population Council, 2008). Population Council, Meeting the Health and Social Needs of Married Girls in India: The First-time Parents’ Project’s Implementation and Reach (New Delhi: Population Council, 2006).
  • 72. In the past five years there has been a clear increase in the evidence that integrating gen-der does improve reproductive health out-comes. Many of these programs also improve gender outcomes. Thanks to early pioneers117 whose efforts articulated the links between gen-der and development, donors have set gender equality and gender mainstreaming as core principles of their programming.118 Attention to gender issues in development assistance has been the policy of USAID since 1982.119 In 2007, the UN adopted a system-wide policy for gender mainstreaming and that same year the World Health Assembly adopted Resolution WHO 60.25 for integrating gender analysis and actions at all levels of health policies and pro-grams in member states.120 The Programme of Action of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) called for a gender per-spective to be “adopted in all processes of pol-icy formulation and implementation and in the delivery of services, especially in sexual and reproductive health, including family plan-ning.” 121 Many of the strategies highlighted in the ICPD Programme of Action are clearly evi-dent in the programs described in this report. Today, women and men are reaping the ben-efits of gender-integrated programming and stronger evaluations are measuring the effects. This update of the 2004 “So What?” report makes an important contribution to the growing body of literature on gender-based approaches to policy and programming. The evidence pre-sented here suggests that incorporating gender strategies contributes to reducing unintended pregnancy, improving maternal health, reducing HIV/AIDS and other STIs, eliminating harmful practices, and meeting the needs of youth – all broadly included under the term “reproductive health.” As stated earlier, the interventions reviewed here were of two broad types: those that accommodate existing gender differences and inequities to achieve RH goals; and those that seek to transform gender norms and ame-liorate 66 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence gender inequities to overcome RH barri-ers. Significantly, a majority of the interventions in this review employ transformative approaches and this must be counted as a big step forward. Indeed, substantial progress has been made and several of the recommendations made in 2004 can now be listed as achievements, notably: 1) Gender and Measures of Outcomes. There has been progress in the last five years and this review found several projects that do integrate gender perspectives and promote gender equal-ity. Moreover, gender equality and gender-equi-table outcomes are measured more often than they were five years ago. Many organizations are funding and implementing innovative gen-der- integrated programs, and some are also pri-oritizing strong evaluations of gender-integrated programs. For example, USAID has long sup-ported operations research projects, which has included evaluation of gender-integrated pro-gramming. Operations research, along with other program evaluations, has moved the field forward in terms of documenting and measur-ing what difference a gender perspective can make in improving RH as well as gender equity outcomes. The authors did find examples of additional programs that seemed innovative but were lacking in evaluation, thus the impact they may be generating is not known and they were not included in this review. 2) Added Value. While it is still difficult to iso-late the effects of a gender-equitable project on RH/HIV/AIDS, several of the projects reviewed Conclusions 117 See 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights; see also Overholt et al., 1985; Longwe, 1991; and Moser, 1993. 118 Pfannanschmidt et al., 1996; UN, 2002; WHO, 2002; Sida, 2005. 119 USAID, 1982. 120 See www.who.int/gender/mainstreaming/investing/en/ index3.html. 121 UN, 1999. 7
  • 73. Conclusions 67 were quite convincing in demonstrating the “added value” of a gender component. In these projects, control or comparison groups represent the basic RH services to which the gender com-ponent was added. One could argue that much of what was done in the intervention sites really addressed quality of care as much as gender, but the overlap between these two concepts at the operational level should not be seen as invalidat-ing the test of a gender-integrated intervention. Similarly, Chapter 5 (Harmful Practices) docu-ments reproductive health outcomes of inter-ventions that involved gender as their central theme—for example, interventions to stop FGM/C. Again, because of the use of control groups, the extent to which the adoption of a gender perspective in program design contrib-uted to positive gender outcomes is clear. A number of interventions across the chapters, and particularly those related to HIV/ AIDS and youth, focused on changing gender norms related to masculinity, behavior related to sex, and health-seeking. The strong evaluation designs used in most of these programs strengthen the conclusion that adopting a gen-der- transformative approach contributed to posi-tive RH and gender outcomes. 3) Rigorous Evaluations. While there are many ethical, logistical, and financial reasons that not all evaluations can be randomized controlled tri-als (RCTs)—the gold standard of evaluations—the projects reported here demonstrate creativity and innovation in the use of other rigorous evaluation techniques. The development of approaches such as the use of participatory learning methods with youth or the efforts to involve men in maternity care should not be jettisoned just because of the difficulty of isolating the gender component in an evaluation. Qualitative evaluations should not be disregarded due to their inability to quantify change; their conclusions lend powerful insight to the processes of change. 4) Beyond HIV/AIDS. While gender concerns have received more attention in HIV/AIDS/STI prevention work due to the well-documented link between inequitable gender relations and the spread of HIV/AIDS and STIs, the role of gender in the various other RH areas included in this report is increasingly demonstrated. Allowing for double-counting of interventions that address multiple RH areas, 18 of the pro-grams reviewed focus on improved outcomes related to harmful practices; 16 addressed HIV/ AIDS and other STIs; 13 addressed unintended pregnancy; 12 were directed at youth; and 7 addressed maternal health. Most of the pro-grams related to youth also have objectives to improve HIV/AIDS/STI outcomes. Clearly, the importance of gender is being acknowledged across many facets of RH and health. One conclusion from the 2004 report remains true: “Achieving a change in gender relations is a long-term process that may not be reflected in a relatively short-term interven-tion.” 122 The importance of long-term invest-ments in transforming inequitable gender norms that may compromise RH cannot be over-emphasized. Such long-term investments will facilitate dealing with the root causes of inequity rather than only the symptoms of it. Gender norms are learned and reinforced over many years; undoing those norms takes time. The need for evaluations to likewise measure impact over longer spans of time persists. New Findings Many projects related to each RH issue (unin-tended pregnancy, maternal health, etc.) sought to change underlying beliefs and attitudes that shape norms related to power dynamics between women and men, including sexual dynamics. These programs, working with men and women of all ages, have had success in improving gen-der- equitable views. Some programs have been successful in changing behavior, most commonly condom use, but also, in some cases, reducing gender-based violence. Addressing gender norms is time-intensive and requires examination of both male and female norms. All of the 40 programs reviewed here achieved positive reproductive health out-comes, though some were much more limited than the implementers had hoped for, often because the research designs were “contami-nated”. As in the 2004 review, there is always the possibility of reporting bias by participants, but given the increased rigor of many of the evaluations reviewed for the present report, the authors believe this bias has been reduced. As before, changes are more likely to be seen in knowledge and attitudes than in reproductive 122 Boender et al., 2004: 65.
  • 74. health behaviors. Some of the most common RH outcomes measured include knowledge and use of contraceptives (11 interventions each), knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and pre-vention, condom use, and use of HIV/AIDS and pregnancy care services (see Table 1.3 on page 10). Thirty of the 40 interventions reviewed for the present report measured gender impact; all of these reported positive changes on a range of gender outcomes. The most frequently mea-sured gender outcomes were attitudes regarding gender equity and women’s rights and partner communication about FP and other RH issues (nine and 11 evaluations, respectively; see Table 1.4). Most of the other gender outcomes that were measured reflected various dimensions of women’s empowerment; for example, self-confi-dence or self-esteem, community participation and social networks, mobility, decision-making power, and practical skills. Three evaluations used empowerment scales to measure impact on gender outcomes. Based on this review, the key findings from this analysis of 40 projects with evaluation out-comes are that: n Gender-integrated strategies are stronger and better evaluated than five years ago. The analysis found that the strategies used to inte-grate gender were grounded in deeper theo-retical and practical knowledge of the effects of gender on RH. The most promising strate-gies for improving RH outcomes include those that seek to directly confront harmful or ineq-uitable gender norms (e.g. IMAGE, Program H, Stepping Stones), increase community awareness and dialogue around gender and RH (e.g. Soul City, Through our Eyes, Somos Diferentes Somos Iguales), or increase couple communication (e.g. First-time Parents Project). In the current analysis, the evalua-tion methodologies were much more likely to use experimental and quasi-experimental designs. No evaluation in 2004 used random-ized control trials; five evaluations herein used this “gold standard” methodology. Evaluating gender outcomes is necessary to understanding further the mechanisms and the degree to which intervention strategies affect behavior and attitudes. Continued evaluation rigor will further inform and enrich program development and, ultimately, RH outcomes. n Incorporating gender into a range of strate-gies 68 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence leads to a better understanding of RH issues. Each chapter of this review focused on the gender strategies used to address the various RH issues. Looking at the programs in each chapter as a whole, it is clear that careful incorporation of gender into program strategies leads to a better understanding of the RH issue at hand. This is clear in HIV/ AIDS programming: inequitable gender rela-tions in the ability to negotiate safe sex and expectations of intimate relationships fuel transmission of HIV. Strategies to meet the needs of youth focus on establishing strong foundations for young women and men to grow into adulthood with good reproductive health, and understanding the gender roles that guide their behavior leads to more effec-tive programs. Programs for youth work to strengthen communication and negotiation skills. Programs for young women also pro-vide livelihood skills and establish communi-ty networks for this group, especially important because young women are often isolated. Examining harmful practices, one can see that they are clearly rooted in gen-der roles, and that any effort to mitigate these practices needs to encompass the social constructions of gender that have legitimated those practices over time. If any areas seem to be lagging behind, they would be the areas involving unintended pregnancy and maternal mortality. The unin-tended pregnancy interventions appeared to incorporate gender in less ambitious and accommodating ways compared to other RH areas. In addition, fewer interventions were found here than in the 2004 review of reduc-ing unintended pregnancy. Maternal health had the fewest number of evaluated interven-tions of any of the RH topics. Nonetheless, evidence exists that the healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy can be improved by incorporating gender in programs, with the result of healthier mothers and families. n Formative research is critical. As noted in many of the interventions reviewed, forma-tive research is critical for designing gender interventions. Programs to integrate gender benefit greatly from initial formative research to determine specific social and gender dynamics in project areas. This type
  • 75. Conclusions 69 of groundwork can help determine which groups should be included in specific inter-ventions. Formative research can also help ensure that the project is meeting local needs and that it is being implemented with an understanding of the local context. n Programs that integrate gender can benefit from working at multiple levels. The 40 projects reviewed include work with indi-viduals, couples, families, community lead-ers, providers, and policymakers, among other groups. Many of the projects also link individual-level interventions with commu-nity- level interventions, such as mass media or social marketing campaigns. Gender-integrated components of reproduc-tive health programming are often embedded in participatory or community empowerment initiatives. This theme is common in many of the projects, including Through Our Eyes, Stepping Stones, Program H, AYA, and moth-ers2mothers. Some of these programs seek to empower both women and communities. The various programs have involved married women, men, youth, parents, and communi-ty leaders. Some programs worked not only with the health sector, but also in the areas of agriculture, education, and economic development. Because changing norms is a community process, projects will benefit from careful consideration of the multiple levels at which gender norms operate and inclusion of a community involvement or mobilization component. n Projects that integrate gender need to focus on costs, scale up, and identifying policy and systemic changes required to “mainstream” gender. Notably absent from many of the projects reviewed here is ade-quate attention to the costs of the projects and the feasibility of scaling up the inter-ventions. Given the time-intensive nature of some of the interventions, particularly for those that seek to examine and change per-sonal views about gender norms, consider-ations for scale up are critical. Moreover, few of the projects included discussion about national or sectoral policies that might exacerbate gender inequality or, con-versely, enhance gender equality. Future Directions This publication makes a critically important contribution to the continuing quest for con-clusive evidence that incorporating gender components to programs improves RH out-comes. While the reviewers might wish for more conclusive data and more in-depth descriptions of what makes a program gender transformative, there can be no doubt that the field has come a long way in the last five years. Many challenges remain, not the least of which is that more investment still needs to be made in monitoring and evaluation if we are to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that integrating gender yields improvements in RH outcomes. Donors should be encouraged to focus their fund-ing efforts on gender integration interventions and evaluations, and, in turn, to encourage imple-menting organizations to measure gender impact. Given the evidence presented here, we recommend that development experts focus particularly on: n Scaling up and replicating the programs that have been proven to work; n Focusing on transformative approaches in interventions, particularly in those that seek to reduce unintended pregnancy; n Undertaking cost-effectiveness research to shed light on how to achieve these improve-ments in RH in a manner that is affordable and feasible for both donors and governments; n Institutionalizing these achievements through policy change; and n Conducting sustainability analyses to learn how long these changes last, and what fol-low- up may be needed over time to ensure that the positive impacts of interventions to improve gender-equity are maintained and passed on to future generations. It is the fervent hope of the authors that more program planners, policymakers, and funders will insist on incorporating gender into RH programs. The way forward, focusing on well-evaluated projects that address policy, sys-tems, and cost issues, scaling up gender inte-gration, and addressing sustainability of equitable gender relations over time, will make important contributions to health and lives of women, men, and families.
  • 76. Appendix: Quick Reference Guide The following tables summarize the objectives, strategies, reproductive health outcomes, and gender outcomes of the interventions included in this report. The tables, like this report, are organized by RH issue area (unintended pregnancy, maternal health, STIs/HIV/AIDS, harmful practices, and youth). Table A.2 identifies interventions by evaluation methodologies. 70 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 77. Appendix: Table A.1 71 Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number Reducing Unintended Pregnancy Cultivating Men's Interest in FP Male Motivation Campaign PRACHAR I II PROCOSI Reproductive Health Awareness Project Concern International, Institute for Reproductive Health (Georgetown University) Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health CCP, Guinean Ministry of Health Pathfinder International, local NGOs PROCOSI, Population Council KAANIB Foundation Increase men's involvement in FP decision-making and practice Increase access and demand for health care services; improve quality of care; improve coordination among health care providers and services Improve the health and welfare of young mothers and their children by changing traditional customs of early childbearing Assess the impact and cost of incorporating a gender perspective in reproductive health service delivery Improve men's involvement in RH matters Integration of FP mes-sages into water and sanitation program Community outreach to religious leaders; social mobilization through advocacy and multimedia interven-tions Nonformal education; parent and community involvement; provision of contraceptives Institutionalize a gen-der perspective in RH service delivery Education sessions on RH and partner com-munication Greater contraceptive knowledge by women and men; greater fer-tility knowledge by women and men Greater contraceptive knowledge; greater family planning use Lengthened first birth interval; improved knowledge, attitudes toward, and use of contraception; increased knowledge of risks of early child-bearing; fewer teenage pregnancies Increased client satis-faction with providers and care; decline in unmet need for con-traceptives Greater knowledge of women's fertile period; increased knowledge and practice of self breast and testicular exams; greater contraceptive knowledge Greater partner com-munication regarding family planning and communication Increased partner communication about family planning None Increased partner communication about FP and sexual rela-tions Great partner communication around family planning El Salvador Guinea India Bolivia Philippines 14 13 16 20 15 Program Quick-Reference Guide
  • 78. 72 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number REWARD Together for a Happy Family Women's Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors FEMME Project Nepal Red Cross Society, Centre for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities, CEDPA Jordanian National Population Committee, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health CCP Family Health Alliance CARE Peru, Peruvian Ministry of Health Strengthen women's capabilities for informed decision-making to prevent unintended pregnancy and improve repro-ductive health Enlist men's support in making informed decisions with their wives toward using family planning Address maternal mortality in Afghanistan by preventing unwanted pregnancies and promoting birth spacing through the expansion of family planning services Improve access, use, and quality of emergency obstetric care (EMOC) for pregnant women Expand access to and delivery of quality, gender-sensitive FP and health informa-tion; promote an enabling environment that strengthens wom-en's informed RH decision-making National multimedia campaign to involve men in family planning Empowerment strategies and training of female health providers Multi-component strategy to standardize handling of cases and encourage women's right-based approach to obstetric care through organization changes Increased contracep-tive prevalence rate; increased registration for ANC Greater contraceptive use by men; greater contraceptive knowl-edge Greater provider knowledge of family planning and STI detection and trans-mission; improved clinical skills Increase in meeting women's EMOC needs; reduced case-fatality rate None Increased spousal communication about FP reported by men None None Nepal Jordan Afghanistan Peru 17 14 18 23 Program Quick-Reference Guide Improving Maternal Health
  • 79. Appendix: Table A.1 73 Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) Men in Maternity (India) Social Mobilization or Government Services Integration of RH Services for Men in Health and Family Welfare Centers Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health Reproductive Health Research Unit (RHRU) University of the Witwatersrand, KwaZulu Natal Department of Health, Population Council Employee's State Insurance Corporation, Population Council Foundation for Research in Health Systems, ICRW NIPORT and Directorate of Family Planning, FRONTIERS/ Population Council Association for the Benefit of the Ecuadorian Family (APROFE) Expand antenatal and post-partum care pro-gram to improve RH; increase the use of appropriate post-par-tum family planning Investigate the feasi-bility, acceptability and cost of a model of maternity care that encourages husbands’ participation in antenatal and postpartum care Examine the effective-ness and cost of addressing 'supply' versus 'demand' con-straints to improve RH for young married women Integrate male repro-ductive health services within the existing government female-focused health care delivery system Increase the number of male clients seek-ing and receiving RH/ STI services Clinic-based: strength-en existing antenatal package and service monitoring; train health providers Individual/couple/ group counseling, STI screening, and syn-dromic management Social mobilization through community-based organizations; strengthening govern-ment services through training for service providers Community outreach and mobilization; training for service providers Encourage female users to involve male part-ners; radio campaigns; adjust clinic hours to men’s schedules Greater knowledge of dual protection pro-vided by condoms; increased assistance by men during an emergency situation Greater contraceptive knowledge for women and men; greater FP use; greater knowl-edge of warnings signs in pregnancy; increase in screening of pregnant women for syphilis Greater knowledge of maternal health, contraceptive side effects, and abortion; increased use of services Increased clinic visits by men; increased clinic visits by women Increased clinic visits by men Increased partner communication on STIs, sexual relations, immunization, and breastfeeding Greater inter-spousal communication on baby's health; increased joint decisionmaking on family health and FP Improved community support for young women's health needs None None South Africa India India Bangladesh Ecuador 25 24 27 36 37 Program Quick-Reference Guide Reducing HIV/AIDS and other STIs
  • 80. 7744 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number Men as Partners mothers2 mothers Play Safe Program H Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales Stepping Stones EngenderHealth mothers2mothers Reproductive Health Initiative for Youth in Asia (EU/UNFPA) Instituto Promundo Puntos de Encuentro Medical Research Council Increase information and services to improve men’s RH; promote male engage-ment to challenge gender norms Provide education and psychosocial support to HIV-positive preg-nant women and new mothers; help them to access health care services for PMTCT and postpartum care Promote healthy behaviors about sex, drug use, and gender relations among mid-dle- class male youth Improve young men’s attitudes toward gen-der norms; reduce HIV/STI risk Empower young men and women to prevent HIV infection in Nicaragua Improve sexual health by building stronger, more gender-equitable relationships with bet-ter communication between partners Multiple macro- and micro-level strategies including workshops, media, and advocacy Peer education and mentoring Peer education and out-reach (pilot project) A validated curriculum for group education; lifestyle social market-ing campaign Mass media: Sexto Sentido television series Participatory learning approaches in single-sex peer groups Improvement in knowledge about RH; improved attitudes toward IPV and deci-sion- making Increased exclusive breastfeeding; greater knowledge of MTCT transmission; greater receipt and ingestion of nevirapine; greater CD4 testing; greater contraception use Greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS; reduction in frequency of commer-cial sex; greater con-dom use; greater use of reproductive health services Increased understand-ing of association between gender and HIV/AIDS; reduced STI symptoms Greater knowledge and use of RH servic-es; greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmis-sion and prevention; greater condom use with partners Lower STI symptoms; greater condom use in last 12 months; fewer partners; lower per-petuation of IPV/SV Increased gender-equitable attitudes regarding women's rights Greater psychosocial well-being None Increased support of gender-equitable norms; support for gender-equity in GEM Scale Reduced stigmatizing and gender-inequitable attitudes; higher gen-der index values; increased self-efficacy Improved partner communication; changes in attitudes regarding acceptability of IPV/SV South Africa South Africa Cambodia Brazil Nicaragua South Africa 33 36 34 42 32 40 Program Quick-Reference Guide
  • 81. Appendix: Table A.1 75 Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number Tuelimishane Yaari Dosti Behane Hewan Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ RSH Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra Tuelimishane Project Instituto Promundo, CORO, Horizons/ Population Council Ethiopian Ministry of Youth and Sport, Amhara Regional Youth Bureau, UNFPA, Population Council Swaasthya, ICRW Institute of Health Management Pachod, ICRW Reduce HIV risk behaviors and vio-lence by young men through gender-focused, community-based interventions, including drama and peer support Examine the effective-ness of interventions designed to improve young men’s attitudes toward gender norms and to reduce HIV/STI risk Sensitize communities to the risks and disad-vantages of child mar-riage; promote education to prevent early marriage Improve the social and health status of adolescent girls; pro-mote self-develop-ment and increase self-confidence and self-esteem; delay age at marriage Increase girls’ self-esteem and literacy; delay age at marriage Community theater and peer support groups to promote dialog on gen-der and HIV A validated curriculum and lifestyle social mar-keting campaign (an adaptation of Program H) Harmful Practices Social mobilization of adolescent girls; nonformal education and livelihood programs for out-of-school girls; community dialogue on early marriage; fiscal incentives to families A one-year life skills training course; infor-mation, education, and communication cam-paign A one-year life skills training course; parent and community involvement Positive shift in atti-tudes toward violence against women; decreased HIV risk behaviors; increased use of condoms at last sex with primary partner Increased understand-ing of association between gender norms and HIV/AIDS; increased condom use with all partners; reduction in self-reported IPV Increased knowledge and communication on HIV, STIs, and FP; reduced likelihood that younger adolescents were married; increased contracep-tive use Greater S/RH knowl-edge; improved menstrual hygiene Increased age at marriage; improved S/RH knowledge Positive changes in attitudes toward norms regarding gen-der roles and IPV Increased support of gender-equitable norms; improvements in partner communi-cation Increased school attendance for girls Improved perceived self-determination Improved cognitive and practical skills; increased willingness to act autonomously Tanzania India Ethiopia India India 38 33 45 45 52 Program Quick-Reference Guide early marriage and childbearing
  • 82. 76 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number Awash FGM/C Elimination Project Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C Navrongo FGM/C Experiment Tostan Community-based Education Program IMAGE CARE Ethiopia, local NGOs, Population Council IntraHealth International Navrongo Health Research Center Tostan, GTZ, Population Council Small Enterprise Foundation Empower women for greater participation in community and to discuss FGM/C with partners Increase knowledge about FGM/C and change behavior Accelerate abandon-ment of FGM/C in the Kassena-Nanka district of Northern Ghana Provide information to support a strategy to improve women's health and abandon-ment of FGC Increase women’s empowerment through micro-lending, gender awareness, and HIV training BCC and educational activities to break the silence surrounding FGM/C; meetings with community groups; performances Improve women's empowerment and initi-ate community dialog through the perspec-tives of health, gender, law/rights, religion, and information Community involve-ment, FGM/C education, livelihood and develop-ment activities for young girls Basic education pro-gram including hygiene, problem solving, wom-en's health, and human rights Micro-finance through women’s groups and gender-focused training Increased knowledge regarding conse-quences of FGM/C; greater contraceptive knowledge; greater family planning use Change in attitudes regarding FGM/C; increased community action against FGM/C Decreased FGM/C incidence Improved knowledge of contraception, STIs, prenatal care, and violence; decreased incidence of violence; greater awareness of FGC consequences; decreased FGC incidence Decreased IPV/SV; more progressive attitudes toward IPV/ SV; decreased control-ling behavior by intimate partner Spousal communica-tion regarding family planning; increased public discussion of FGM/C Teachers, media, and religious leaders made public declarations against FGM/C None Improved attitudes toward girls' school-ing; improved atti-tudes toward role of women's unions to demand rights Increased score on women's empower-ment scale; increased progressive attitudes toward gender norms Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan Ethiopia Ghana Senegal South Africa 47 48 46 54 56 Program Quick-Reference Guide Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Gender-based Violence
  • 83. Appendix: Table A.1 77 Table A.1 Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number One Man Can Campaign Soul City Through Our Eyes African Youth Alliance Program First-time Parents Project Sonke Gender Justice Soul City Institute for Health Development Communication, National Network on Violence Against Women American Refugee Committee, Communication for Change UNFPA, PATH, Pathfinder International Child in Need Institute, Deepak Charitable Trust, Population Council Male involvement to take action against domestic and sexual violence Address gender norms at the commu-nity and individual levels through ‘edutainment’ Provide participants with a safe environ-ment to share experi-ences, develop new ideas, and address gender-based violence in their communities Improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health and to prevent transmission of HIV/ AIDS Develop an integrated package of health and social interventions to improve married young women's S/RH knowl-edge/ practices, and self-determination BCC campaign and Action Kit to promote the idea that all men have a role to play in ending violence against women Multi-media health pro-motion campaign using TV and radio broadcasts incorporating social issues into entertain-ment formats Participatory communi-ty engagement with video and community playback sessions Implementation and scaling up a comprehensive set of integrated ASRH interventions using existing institutions Educational home vis-its; counseling ses-sions; girls' group formation; training for health care providers Greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmis-sion and prevention; decrease in men's beliefs that violence against women is jus-tified in some circum-stances Increased knowledge of IPV/SV resources; decreased beliefs that men are justified in beating their partners; increased number of respondents taking action to stop IPV/SV Increased uptake of reproductive health services; increased capacity to make healthy decisions to mitigate consequences of risky sexual behavior Increased HIV/AIDS knowledge; increased confidence in negotiating condom use; increased delay of sexual debut; increased contracep-tive use Increased clinic visits for maternal health; greater family plan-ning use; improved partner communica-tion More gender-equitable beliefs in sex decision-making Women's increased awareness of self-worth and identity Improved gender relations; women more articulate in discussing IPV/SV and RH None Increased mobility, social networks devel-oped; increased part-ner support and communication South Africa South Africa Liberia Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda India 50 49 50 59 64 Program Quick-Reference Guide Meeting the Needs of Youth
  • 84. 78 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence Program Name Organization Objectives Strategies RH Outcomes Gender Outcomes Cou ntries page number Guria Adolescent Health Project Ishraq New Visions Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training Transitions to Adulthood - Tap Reposition Youth CARE International Caritas, Save the Children, Population Council, CEDPA CEDPA, local NGOs CARE India, Population Council K-Rep Development Agency, Population Council Achieve improvements in reproductive health through improving life skills of adolescents; provide youth-friendly information and ser-vices; raise communi-ty awareness Improve the life opportunities of rural out-of-school girls by improving literacy and education, livelihoods, health knowledge, and social policies Develop life skills and increase gender sensitivity and RH knowledge among boys and young men in order to improve outcomes for girls and women Deliver technical skills and transform the way girls view themselves Improve livelihood options; reduce unplanned pregnan-cies; decrease vulner-ability to STIs, HIV, and unsafe abortion Health education and social marketing; the-ater; micro-grants; youth-friendly services Nonformal educational sessions; female cham-pions; sports and physi-cal activity; home skills/ livelihoods training A series of 64 nonfor-mal educational ses-sions facilitated by peer leaders Group education; vocational training; financial counseling; peer mentors Financial empowerment through microcredit, combined with a focus on gender attitudes Greater contraceptive knowledge; greater family planning use Decline in acceptance of early marriage; decline in girls' favor-able attitudes toward FGM/C; improved atti-tudes toward violence Increased positive responses about IPV/ SV and FGC; greater knowledge of family planning sources; greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmis-sion Greater RH knowledge Greater ability to negotiate condom use with partner; greater ability to refuse sex Decreased tolerance for kidnapping Increased levels of self-confidence; improved gender attitudes Increased gender-equitable beliefs about gender roles and equi-table treatment Greater social skills; increased group membership Increased liberal gender attitudes; increased income and household assets Georgia Egypt Egypt India Kenya 59 62 61 60 60 Program Quick-Reference Guide Table A.1
  • 85. Appendix: Table A.2 79 Table A.2 Evaluation Methodologies, by Category and Program Name Type of evaluation methodology # Main (and sub categories) Program name (and country) Experimental Design (Randomized control 5 HP/IPV/SV (UP, HIV/AIDS/STI) IMAGE (South Africa) trial, 2x2 or 4 cell) MH (Youth) Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) HP/FGM/C (Youth) Navrongo FGM/C Experiment (Ghana) MH (UP, Youth) Social Mobilization or Government Services (India) HIV/AIDS/STI Stepping Stones (South Africa) Quasi –Experimental Designs, Including: 17 HP/FGM/C (Youth) Awash FGM/C (Ethiopia, Sudan, Kenya) • Pretest-posttest, cluster sample HP/EM (Youth) Behane Hewan (Ethiopia) • Pretest-posttest, control group design UP (MH) Cultivating Men’s Interest in FP (El Salvador) • Non-equivalent control group HP/EM (Youth) Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra (India) • Quasi-experimental control group MH FEMME Project (Peru) • Case-control group Youth (UP, MH) First Time Parents (India) HIV/AIDS/STI (MH) Integration of RH Services for Men in Health and Family Welfare Centers (Bangladesh) Youth (HP/EM) Ishraq (Egypt) MH (UP) Men in Maternity (India) HIV/AIDS/STI (MH) mothers2mothers (South Africa) UP (HP/EM, MH) PRACHAR I II (India) HIV/AIDS/STI Program H (Brazil) HIV/AIDS/STI Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales (Nicaragua) HP/FGM/C (UP, MH) Tostan Community Empowerment Program (Senegal, Burkina Faso) Youth (UP, HIV/AIDS/STI) Transition to Adulthood – Tap and Reposition Youth (Kenya) HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV) Tuelimishane (Tanzania) UP (MH) Reproductive Health Awareness (Philippines) Non-Experimental Study Design 15 Youth (HIV/AIDS/STI) Africa Youth Alliance (Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda) HP/EM (Youth) Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ Reproductive and Sexual Health (India) Youth (UP) Guria Adolescent Health Project (Georgia) HIV/AIDS/STI Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ecuador) UP Male Motivation Campaign (Guinea) HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV) Men as Partners (South Africa) Youth (HIV/AIDS/STI, HP/GBV) New Visions (Egypt) HP/GBV (HIV/AIDS/STI) One Man Can Campaign (South Africa) UP PROCOSI (Bolivia) UP (MH) REWARD (Nepal) HP/GBV Soul City (South Africa) UP Together for a Happy Family (Jordan) Youth Transitions to Adulthood – Livelihoods Training (India) UP (MH) Women’s Empowerment Model to Train for Midwives and Doctors (Afghanistan) HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV) Yaari Dosti (India) Qualitative 3 HP/FGM/C Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C (Ethiopia) HIV/AIDS/STI (HP/GBV, Youth) Play Safe (Cambodia) HP/GBV Through Our Eyes (Liberia)
  • 86. Table A.3 Selected Reproductive Health Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report Outcomes Related To: Page Number Healthy Timing, Spacing, and Limiting of Pregnancies Greater contraceptive knowledge Awash FGM/C 47 Behane Hewan 45 Tostan Community Empowerment Program 54 Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 14 Guria Adolescent Health Project 59 Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) 25 Male Motivation Campaign 13 Men in Maternity (India) 24 Reproductive Health Awareness 15 Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 Together for a Happy Family 14 Greater contraceptive use African Youth Alliance Program 59 Awash FGM/C 47 Behane Hewan 45 First-time Parents Project 64 Guria Adolescent Project 59 Male Motivation Campaign 13 Men in Maternity (India) 24 mothers2mothers 36 PRACHAR I II 16 REWARD 17 Together for a Happy Family 14 Greater awareness of fertility Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 14 Reproductive Health Awareness 15 Maternal Mortality and Safe Motherhood Increase in use of skilled pregnancy care First-time Parents Project 64 REWARD 17 Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 Increase in joint decision-making with partner about contraception Men as Partners 33 Men in Maternity (India) 24 Reduced case fatality rate FEMME Project 23 Increase in client satisfaction with providers and care PROCOSI 20 Decline in unmet need for contraceptives PROCOSI 20 Increase in screening of pregnant women for Syphilis Men in Maternity (India) 24 Increase in women’s emergency obstetric care needs being met FEMME Project 23 Greater knowledge of warnings signs in pregnancy Men in Maternity (India) 24 Improved provider clinical skills knowledge of FP methods STI care Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors 18 Increase in awareness of prenatal care Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 80 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 87. Appendix: Table A.3 81 Table A.3 Selected Reproductive Health Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report Outcomes Related To: Page Number HIV/AIDS and Other STIs Greater knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and prevention African Youth Alliance Program 59 Behane Hewan 45 Men as Partners 33 New Visions 61 One Man Can 50 Play Safe 34 Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 Greater condom use: At last sex: Program H 42 Tuelimishane 38 Yaari Dosti 33 With primary partner: Play Safe 34 Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 Stepping Stones 40 Yaari Dosti 33 Increase in visits to centers that provide HIV/AIDS and STI services Integration of RH Services for Men in Health and Family Welfare Centers 36 Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health 37 Play Safe 34 Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 Lower reported STI symptoms Program H 42 Stepping Stones 40 Greater knowledge of STI symptoms Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 Increased exclusive breastfeeding mothers2mothers 36 Greater receipt ingestion of Nevirapine mothers2mothers 36 Greater CD4 testing mothers2mothers 36 Harmful Practices (early marriage, intimate partner violence, female genital mutilation/cutting) Decrease in belief that IPV/SV is justified under some circumstances One Man Can Campaign 50 Soul City 49 Stepping Stones 40 Greater knowledge of IPV/SV resources Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 Soul City 49 Decrease in incidence of violence Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 Stepping Stones 40 Yaari Dosti 33 Increased community action and protest against harmful practices Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C 48 Soul City 49
  • 88. Table A.3 Selected Reproductive Health Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report Outcomes Related To: Page Number Attitudes toward IPV/SV IMAGE 56 Men as Partners 33 New Visions 61 Tuelimishane 38 Decrease in risk of IPV/SV IMAGE 56 Decrease in controlling behavior by intimate partner IMAGE 56 Increased uptake of RH services Through Our Eyes 50 Greater knowledge of harmful consequences of FGM/C and advantages of not cutting girls Awash FGM/C 47 Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 Ishraq 62 Attitudes toward FGM/C Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C in Ethiopia 48 New Visions 61 Increase in number of men who marry uncircumcised girls Five Dimensional Approach for the Eradication of FGM/C in Ethiopia 48 Decrease in FGM/C incidence Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 Navrongo FGM/C Experiment 46 Increase in age at marriage Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 52 Increase in interval between marriage and first birth PRACHAR I II 16 Greater knowledge of risks of early childbearing PRACHAR I II 16 Fewer adolescent pregnancies PRACHAR I II 16 Fewer adolescent marriages Behane Hewan 45 Youth Reproductive Health Greater sexual and reproductive health knowledge Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ RSH 45 Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 52 Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training 60 Increase in decision-making ability related to: Condom use: African Youth Alliance Program 59 Transitions to Adulthood - Tap and Reposition Youth 60 Sex: Transitions to Adulthood - Tap and Reposition Youth 60 Increase in age at sexual debut African Youth Alliance Program 59 82 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 89. Appendix: Table A.4 83 Table A.4 Selected Gender Outcomes of Interventions Highlighted in this Report Outcomes Related To: Page Number Increased gender-equitable attitudes and beliefs IMAGE 56 Men as Partners 33 New Visions 61 One Man Can Campaign 50 Program H 42 Tap and Reposition Youth 60 Tostan Community-based Education Program 54 Tuelimishane 38 Yaari Dosti 33 Increased partner communication about reproductive health or family planning Awash FGM/C 47 Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning 14 First-time Parents Project 64 Involving Men in Maternity Care (South Africa) 25 Men in Maternity (India) 24 Male Motivation Campaign 13 PROCOSI 20 Reproductive Health Awareness 15 Stepping Stones 40 Together for a Happy Family 14 Yaari Dosti 33 Women's increased self-confidence, self-esteem, or self-determination Building Life Skills to Improve Adolescent Girls’ RSH 45 Ishraq 62 mothers2mothers 36 Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 Soul City 49 Women's increased participation in the community and development of social networks Behane Hewan 45 First-time Parents Project 64 Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training 60 Increased support (emotional, instrumental, family planning, or general support) from partners or community First-time Parents Project 64 Social Mobilization or Government Services 27 Higher scores on an empowerment scale for women IMAGE 56 Ishraq 62 Somos Diferentes, Somos Iguales 32 Increased life and social skills Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra 52 Transitions to Adulthood - Livelihoods Training 60 Women's increased decision-making power Through Our Eyes 50 Higher formal educational participation for women or girls Behane Hewan 45 Women's increased mobility First-time Parents Project 64 Improved gender relations within the community Through Our Eyes 50 Women more articulate in discussing IPV/SV and RH Through Our Eyes 50 Decreased tolerance for kidnapping of girls Guria Adolescent Health Project 59
  • 90. References General Barker, Gary and Christine Ricardo. Young Men and the Construction of Masculinity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for HIV/AIDS, Conflict, and Violence. Social Development Papers: Conflict Prevention Reconstruction. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005. Barker, G., C. Ricardo, and M. Mascimento. Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007. Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA). ENABLE’s Contributions to the Reproductive Health Field. Washington, DC: CEDPA, 2003. Clark, A., S. Hutchinson, and E. Weiss. Young Men and HIV Prevention. Washington, DC: Population Council/HORIZONS, 2004. Cohen, Sylvie I. and Michele Burger. “It Takes 2: Partnering With Men in Reproductive and Sexual Health.” UNFPA Programme Advisory Note. New York: UNFPA, 2003. Coll-Black, S., A. Bhushan, K. Fritsch, and J. Balabagno. Integrating Poverty and Gender into Health Programmes: A Report on Surveys of Health Ministries and Educational Institutions. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005. Dahlberg, Linda L. and Alexander Butchart . “State of the Science: Violence Prevention Efforts in Developing and Developed Countries.” International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 12, no.2 (2005): 93-104. Human Rights Watch. Hidden in the Mealie Meal: Gender-Based Issues and Women’s HIV Treatment in Zambia. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2007. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). How Gender Sensitive Are Your HIV and Family Planning Services? New York: IPPF, 2002. International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). Engaging Men and Boys to Achieve Gender Equality: How Can We Build on What We Have Learned? Washington, DC: ICRW, 2007. ICRW. Program Scan Matrix on Child Marriage. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. ICRW. “Reducing Women’s and Girls’ Vulnerability to HIV/AIDS by Strengthening their Property and Inheritance Rights.” Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. ICRW. “When Marriage Is No Haven…Child Marriage in Developing Countries: What Works To Keep Girls Safe.” Washington, DC: ICRW, 2004. Longwe, S.H. “Gender Awareness: The Missing Element in the Third World Development Project.” In T. Wallace and C.March, eds. Changing Perceptions: Writings on Gender and Development. Oxford, England: Oxfam, 1991. Moser, C. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. London: Routledge, 1993. Murphy, Elaine and Dara Carr. Powerful Partners: Adolescent Girls Education and Delayed Childbearing. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2007. Overholt, C.A., K. Cloud, M.B. Anderson, and J.E. Austin. “Women in Development: A Framework for Project Analysis.” In C.A. Overholt, M.B. Anderson, K. Cloud, and J.E. Austin, eds. Gender Roles in Development Projects. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press, 1985. Pallitto, Christina C. and Patricia O’Campo. “The Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence and Unintended Pregnancy: Analysis of a National Sample From Columbia.” International Family Planning Perspectives 30, no. 4 (2004): 165-173. Pfannenschmidt, S., A. McKay, and E. McNeill. Through a Gender Lens: Resources for Population, Health and Nutrition Projects. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International, 1996. 84 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 91. References 85 Ravindran, T. K. Sundari, A. Bhushan, and K. Fritsch. Integrating Poverty and Gender Into Health Programmes: A Sourcebook for Health Professionals. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Department for Democracy and Social Development, Gender Equality Team. Policy Promoting Gender Equality in Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Sida, 2005. United Nations (UN). International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of Action. New York: UN, 1994. UN. Key Actions for the Further Implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development. New York: UN, 1999. UN Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues. Gender Mainstreaming, An Overview. New York: UN, 2002. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). AID Policy Paper: Women in Development. Washington, DC: USAID Bureau for Program and Policy Coordination, 1982. White, V., M.E. Greene, and E. Murphy. Men and Reproductive Health Programs: Influencing Gender Norms. Washington, DC: The Synergy Project: 2003. Winder, Roger. HIV and Men Who Have Sex With Men in Asia and the Pacific. UNAIDS Best Practice Collection. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2006. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Gender Policy: Integrating Gender Perspectives in the Work of WHO. Geneva: WHO, 2002. Introduction Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2004. Caro, D., J. Schueller, M. Ramsey, and W. Voet. A Manual for Integrating Gender into Reproductive Health and HIV Programs: From Commitment to Action. Prepared on Behalf of the Gender Manual Task Force for the Interagency Gender Working Group of the USAID Bureau for Global Health. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2003 (2nd Edition forthcoming in 2009). Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (GFATM). The Process for Developing a Strategy on the Scaling Up of a Gender-sensitive Response to AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria by the Global Fund. 9th Policy and Strategy Committee Meeting. Geneva: GFATM, 2008. Riley, N. “Gender, Power and Population Change.” Population Bulletin 52, no. 1 (May 1997). Roses, M. “Talking Points from the Director at the PAHO International Women’s Day 2008 Celebration.” Washington, DC: PAHO, 2008. Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.paho.org/ English/D/DSpeech_IWD08_eng.htm. Schuler, Sidney Ruth. In Accommodating, Reinforcing Gender Inequity in Family Planning Programs. JSI Working Paper no. 14. Boston: JSI, 1999. UN. Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective into all Policies and Programmes in the United Nations System. ECOSOC Resolution 2008/34. New York: UN, 2008. UN Population Fund (UNFPA). State of the World Population. New York: UNFPA, 2008. World Bank. Gender Equality as Smart Economics: A World Bank Group Gender Action Plan. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2006. World Bank. Mainstreaming Gender Considerations in the Multi-Country HIV/AIDS Program (MAP): A Portfolio Review of Selected Programs. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2006. World Health Organization (WHO). Integrating Gender Analysis and Actions into the Work of WHO: Draft Strategy. Sixtieth World Health Assembly, WHA 60_R25. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2007. Reducing Unintended Pregnancy Bezmalinovic, B., W.S. Duflon, A. Hirschmann, and R. Lundgren. Guatemala City Women: Empowering a Vulnerable Group to Prevent HIV Transmission. Report-in-Brief, Women and AIDS Research Program. Washington, DC: ICRW, 1997. Biddlecom, Anne and Bolaji M. Fapohunda. “Covert Contraceptive Use: Prevalence, Motivations, and Consequences.” Studies in Family Planning 29 (1998): 360-372. Blake, Michael and Stella Babalola. Impact of a Male Motivation Campaign on Family Planning Ideation and Practice in Guinea. Field Report no. 13. Baltimore, MD: JHU Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2002.
  • 92. Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2004. Castle, S., M.K. Konate, P.R. Ulin, and S. Martin. “A Qualitative Study of Clandestine Contraceptive Use in Urban Mali.” Studies in Family Planning 30, no.3 (1999): 231-248. CREHPA. Enabling Women for Reproductive Health: The REWARD Project. Washington, DC: CEDPA, 2002. Daniel, E.E., R. Masilamani, and M. Rahman. “The Effect of Community-Based Reproductive Health Communication Interventions on Contraceptive Use Among Young Married Couples in Bihar, India.” International Family Planning Perspectives 34, no. 4 (2008): 189-197. Devries, K. “Together for a Happy Family Campaign - Jordan.” In Communication Initiative Network, 2003. Diallo, Tanou. Assessing Synergies between the PRISM II Bilateral Project and Complementary PVO Programs. Washington DC: USAID 2006. DiMatteo, M.R. “The Physician-Patient Relationship: Effects on the Quality of Health Care.” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 37, no.1 (1994):149- 161. Goldberg, H.I. and A. Toros. “The Use of Traditional Methods of Contraception Among Turkish Couples.” Studies In Family Planning 25, no.2 (1994): 122- 128. Hoang, T.A., T.H. Minh, N.M. Duc, B.T. Thanh Mai, P.V. Thien, V.S. Ha, P.T. Thu Ha, Q.T. Trang, S.R. Schuler, and D. Santillán. Impact of the Cairo Programme of Action: Gender, Women’s Empowerment, and Reproductive Health in Four Vietnamese Communities. Research Results Report. Hanoi, Vietnam: Population and Development International, 2002. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Western Hemisphere Region. Manual to Evaluate Quality of Care from a Gender Perspective. New York: IPPF/WHR, 2000. Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs (JHUCCP). Men in Jordan Get Involved in ‘Together for a Happy Family’. Baltimore, MD: JHU Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2003. Lundgren, R.I., J.N. Gribble, M.E. Greene, G.E. Emrick, and M. de Monroy. “Cultivating Men’s Interest in Family Planning in Rural El Salvador.” Studies in Family Planning 36, no. 3 (2005): 173- 188. Palabrica-Costello, M., Z. Mosende, M. Seidman, and L. Palma-Aealza. Enhancing NGO-LGU Collaboration in Family Planning: Using Community Workers to Reach Men in an Agrarian Setting. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2001. Palenque, E., L. Monano, R. Vernon, F. Gonzales, P. Riveros, and J. Bratt. Effects and Costs of Implementing a Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program. Frontiers Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004. Palenque, E., P. Riveros Hamel, and R. Vernon. Consolidating a Gender Perspective in the PROCOSI Network. Frontiers Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007. Population Council. “Love, Sex, and Abortion Among Unmarried Youth in Ho Chi Minh City: Implications for Policy and Program Interventions.” Unpublished paper, 2000. Robey, B., E. Thomas, S. Baro, S. Kone, and G. Kpakpo. Men: Key Partners in Reproductive Health. A Report on the First Conference of French- Speaking African Countries on Men’s Participation in Reproductive Health, March 30-April 3, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Baltimore, MD: JHU/ CCP, 1998. Salke, Taraneh R. “Lessons from the Field: Using a Women’s Empowerment Model to Train Midwives and Doctors in Afghanistan.” Poster presented at the 2007 APHA Conference. Washington, DC: Family Health Alliance, 2007. Schuler, Sidney Ruth and Zakir Hossain. “Family Planning Clinics Through Women’s Eyes and Voices: A Case Study from Rural Bangladesh.” International Family Planning Perspectives 24, no. 4 (1998):170- 175, 205. Schuler, S.R., E.N. McIntosh, M.C. Goldstein, and B.R. Pande. “Barriers to the Effective Use of Family Planning Services in Kathmandu.” Studies in Family Planning 16, no. 5 (1985): 26-27. Schuler, S.R., L. Bates, and M.K. Islam. “Reconciling Cost Recovery with Health Equity Concerns in a Context of Gender Inequality and Poverty.” International Family Planning Perspectives 28, no. 4 (2002): 196-204. Schuler, S.R., M.E. Choque, and S. Rance. “Misinformation, Mistrust, and Mistreatment: Family Planning among Bolivian Market Women.” Studies in Family Planning 25, no.4 (1994): 211-221. 86 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 93. References 87 Schuler, S.R., S.M. Hashemi, A. Cullum, and M. Hassan. “The Advent of Family Planning as a Social Norm in Bangladesh.” Reproductive Health Matters 7 (1996): 66-78. Sedgh G., R. Hussain, A. Bankole, and S. Singh. Women with an Unmet Need for Contraception in Developing Countries and Their Reasons for Not Using a Method. Occasional Report no. 37. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2007. UNICEF, CDC. “UNICEF and CDC Report on Afghanistan Women’s Health.” Public Health Report 117, no.6 (2002):592. Upadhyay, U.D. Informed Choice in Family Planning: Helping People Decide. Population Reports, Series J, No. 50. Baltimore, MD: JHU Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2001. Wilder, J., R. Masilamani, and E.E. Daniel. Promoting Change in the Reproductive Behavior of Youth: Pathfinder International’s PRACHAR Project. New Delhi: Pathfinder International, 2005. Improving Maternal Health Atkinson, S., and M. Farias. “Perceptions of Risk During Pregnancy Amongst Urban Women in Northeast Brazil.” Social Science and Medicine 45, no. 12 (1995): 1789-1804. Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2004. Bradby, Barbara. “Will I Return or Not? Migrant Women in Bolivia Negotiate Hospital Birth.” Women’s Studies International Forum 22, no. 3 (1999): 287-301. CARE. The FEMME Project in Peru: Partnerships for Improved Health. From the Series Voices for the Village. Atlanta, Georgia: CARE, 2007. Hoang, T.A., T.H. Minh, N.M. Duc, B.T. Thanh Mai, P.V. Thien, V.S. Ha, P.T. Thu Ha, Q.T. Trang, S.R. Schuler, and D. Santillán. Impact of the Cairo Programme of Action: Gender, Women’s Empowerment, and Reproductive Health in Four Vietnamese Communities. Research Results Report. Hanoi, Vietnam: Population and Development International, 2002. Hodnett, E. “Caregiver Support for Women During Childbirth.” In Cochrane Review. Oxford: Cochrane Library, 2001. Hundskopf, M.P.G., L.C. Ancaya, R.H. La Rosa, J.A.C. Quiroz, V.C.S. Condor, J. Goulden, G.F. Martinelli, A.F. Arroyo, D.F. Borjas, and E.E. Leon. Impact of the FEMME Project in Reducing Maternal Mortality and its Significance for Health Policy in Peru. Lima: Ministry of Health, 2006. ICRW. “Social Mobilization or Government Services: What Influences Married Adolescents’ Reproductive Health in Rural Maharashtra, India?” In Briefing Kit, Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in India. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. Jessop, S.M., C. Morrissey, E. Dusch, A. Cox, and E. Jonas, eds. MotherCare’s Initiatives: Actions and Results of 31 Projects, 1993- 2000. Arlington, VA: John Snow, Inc., 2000. Kunene, B., M. Beksinska, S. Zondi, N. Mthembu, S. Mullick, E. Ottolenghi, I. Kleinschmidt, S. Adamchak, B. Janowitz, and C. Cuthbertson. Involving Men in Maternity Care: South Africa. FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004. Nachbar, N. Report on the Use of the Community Diagnosis to Explore Safe Motherhood: A Two Country Comparison and Methodological Critique. Technical Working Paper #6. Arlington, VA: John Snow, Inc., MotherCare, 1997. Pande, R., K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. MacQuarrie, and S. Jain. Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in India: Evidence of Effectiveness and Costs from Community-Based Interventions. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. Raju, Saraswati and Ann Leonard, eds. Men as Supportive Partners in Reproductive Health: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. New Delhi, India: The Population Council South and East Asia Regional Office, 2000. Ronsmans, C. and W.J. Graham. “Maternal Mortality: Who, When, Where and Why.” The Lancet 368, no. 9542 (2006): 1189-1200. Roth, D., and M. Mbizvo. “Promoting Safe Motherhood in the Community: The Case for Strategies That Include Men.” African Journal of Reproductive Health 5, no. 2 (2001): 10-21. Sargent, Carolyn Fishel. Maternity, Medicine, and Power: Reproductive Decisions in Urban Benin. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Schuler, S.R., L. Bates, and M.K. Islam. “Paying for Reproductive Health Services in Bangladesh: Intersections Between Cost, Quality and Culture.” Health Policy and Planning 17, no. 3 (2002).
  • 94. Sen, G., P. Ostlin, and A. George. Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient Gender Inequity in Health: Why It Exists and How We Can Change It. Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet, 2007. Sosa, R., J. Kennell, M. Klaus, S. Robertson, and J. Urrutia. “The Effect of a Supportive Companion on Perinatal Problems, Length of Labor, and Mother- Infant Interaction.” New England Journal of Medicine 303, no. 11 (1980): 597-600. Varkey, L.C., A. Mishra, A. Das, E. Ottolenghi, D. Huntington, S. Adamchak, M.E. Khan, and F. Homan. Involving Men in Maternity Care in India. New Delhi: Population Council, 2004. Vissandjee, B., R. Barlow, and D. Fraser. “Utilization of Health Services Among Rural Women in Gujurat, India.” Public Health 111 (1997): 135-148. World Health Organization (WHO). “Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood: Findings From Concluded Research Studies.” World Health Statistics Quarterly 48 (1995): 2-3. Zhang, J., J.W. Bernasko, E. Leybovich, M. Fahs, and M.C. Hatch. “Continuous Labor Support From Labor Attendant for Primiparous Women: A Meta- Analysis.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 88, no.4 (1996): 739-744. Reducing HIV/AIDS and Other STIs Alam, A., U. Rob, and M.E. Kahn. Integration of Reproductive Health Services for Men in Health and Family Welfare Centers in Bangladesh. Dhaka: National Institution for Population Research and Training, 2004. Antwi, P.M. and Y.P.A. Oppong. “Ghana’s Attempts at Managing the HIV/AIDS Epidemic. A Review of Efforts.” Working Paper Series16, no. 6 in Series on HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sex, Gender and Policy. Boston: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, 2003. Baek, C., V. Mathambo, S. Mkhize, I. Friedman, L. Apicella, and N. Rutenberg. Key Findings from an Evaluation of the mothers3mothers Program in KwaZulu-Nata, South Africa. Washington, DC: Horizons Program, 2007. Barker, G., C. Ricardo, and M. Nascimento. Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-Based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions. Geneva: WHO, 2007. Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2004. Britstein, P., A. Boulle, D. Nash, M. Brinkhof, F. Dabis, C. Laurent, M. Schechter, S. Tuboi, E. Sprinz, P. Miotti, M. Hosseinipour, M. May, M.Egger, D. Bangsberg, N. Low, and the Antiretroviral Therapy in Lower Income Countries (ART-LINC) Study Group. “Gender and the Use of Antiretroviral Treatment in Resource Constrained Settings: Finding from a Multicenter Collaboration.” Journal of Women’s Health 17, no.1 (2008): 47-55. Edwards, M. “Gender Inequality and the AIDS Epidemic.” SIECUS Report 29, no. 5 (June/July, 2001). Espinoza, Henry. “Using Edutainment and Social Activities to Challenge Machismo in Nicaragua.” Sexual Health Exchange 2(2005): 9-10. Family Health International (FHI). Summary Report of Key Findings and Program Recommendations from FHI MSM Program Evaluations. Bangladesh, Indonesia and Nepal: Asia Pacific and Regional Office, FHI, 2007. Fitzgerald, D., F. Behets, A. Caliendo, D. Roberfroid, C. Lucet, J. Fritzgerald, and L. Kukyens. “Economic Hardship and Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Haiti’s Rural Arbonite Valley.” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 62, no. 4 (2000): 496-501. Hossain, S.M.I., U. Rob, M.E. Kahn, A. Al Sabir, and A. Alam. “Integration of Male and Female Reproductive Health Services in Bangladesh With an Emphasis on Increasing Male Participation Awareness.” Population Review 43, no.2 (2004): 88-100. Human Rights Watch (HRW). Double Standards: Women’s Property Rights Violations in Kenya. New York: HRW, 2002. HRW. A Test of Inequity: Discrimination against Women Living with HIV in the Dominican Republic. Washington, DC: HRW, 2004. Jewkes, R., M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, N. Khuzwayo, M. Koss, A. Puren, K. Wood, and N. Duvvury. “A Cluster Randomized-Controlled Trial to Determine the Effectiveness of Stepping Stones in Preventing HIV Infections and Promoting Safer Sexual Behaviour Amongst Youth in the Rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: Trial Design, Methods and Baseline Findings.” Tropical Medicine and International Health 11, no.1 (2006): 3-16. 88 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 95. References 89 Jewkes, R., M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. “Impact of Stepping Stones on HIV, HSV-2 and Sexual Behaviour in Rural South Africa: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.” British Medical Journal 337(2008). Jewkes, R., M. Nduna, J. Levin, N. Jama, K. Dunkle, K. Wood, M. Koss, A. Puren, and N. Duvvury. Evaluation of Stepping Stones: A Gender Transformative HIV Prevention Intervention. A Policy Brief. Pretoria: Medical Research Council, 2007. Kruger, V. “Evaluation Report: Men as Partners Program, Program Evaluation and Research Service.” September, 2000 (unpublished). Levack, Andrew. “Educating Men in South Africa on Gender Issues: The ‘Men as Partners’ Program.” SIECUS Report 29, no. 5 (2001): 13-15. Maganja, R. K., S. Maman, A. Groves, and J.K. Mbwambo. “Skinning the Goat and Pulling the Load: Transactional Sex Among Youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.” AIDS Care 19, no. 8 (2007): 974-981. Mbwambo, Jessie and Suzanne Maman . HIV and Violence Prevention. Horizons Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2007. Mocumbi, P. “A Time for Frankness on AIDS in Africa.” New York Times, June 20, 2001. Cited in M. Edwards,“Gender Inequity and the AIDS Epidemic.” SEICUS Report 9, no. 5 (June/July 2001). Palabrica-Costello, M., Z. Mosende, M. Seidman, and L. Palma-Aealza. Enhancing NGO-LGU Collaboration in Family Planning: Using Community Workers to Reach Men in an Agrarian Setting. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2001. Population Council/Horizons, CORO for Literacy, MAMTA, and Instituto Promundo. Yaari Dosti: Young Men Redefine Masculinity: A Training Manual. New Delhi: Population Council, 2006. Pulerwitz, J., G. Barker, M. Segundo, and M. Nascimento. Promoting More Gender-equitable Norms and Behaviors Among Young Men as an HIV/ AIDS Prevention Strategy. Washington, DC: Horizons Program, 2006. Rock, Y. “Television, Gender, and Change: The Case of ‘Sexto Sentido’ Television, an Education- Entertainment Initiative in Nicaragua.” Master’s Thesis. Great Britain, Cambridge University, 2005. Shepard, Bonnie L. “Addressing Gender Issues with Men and Couples: Involving Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in APROFE, Ecuador.” International Journal of Men’s Health 3, no. 3 (2004): 155-172. Solórzano, I., A. Bank, R. Peña, H. Espinoza, M. Ellsberg, and J. Pulerwitz. Catalyzing Personal and Social Change Around Gender, Sexuality, and HIV: Impact Evaluation of Puntos de Encuentro’s Communication Strategy in Nicaragua. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. UNAIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update December 2007. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2007. UNIFEM. Gender and AIDS Web Portal. Accessed Dec. 1, 2009, at www.genderandaids.org. Verma, R., J. Pulerwitz, V. Mahendra, S. Khandekar, G. Barker, P. Fulpagare, and S.K. Singh. “Challenging and Changing Gender Attitudes among Young Men in Mumbai, India.” Reproductive Health Matters 14, no.28 (2006): 135-143. Verma, R., J. Pulerwitz, V. Mahendra, S. Khandekar, A.K. Singh, S.S. Das, S. Mehra, A. Nura, and G. Barker. Promoting Gender Equity as a Strategy to Reduce HIV Risk and Gender-based Violence Among Young Men in India. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. Weissman, A., J. Cocker, L. Sherburne, M.B. Powers, R. Lovich, and M. Mukaka. “Cross-generational Relationships: Using a ‘Continuum of Volition’ in HIV-Prevention Work among Young People.” Gender Development 14, no. 1 (2006): 81-94. Eliminating Harmful Practices Adhikari, R. K. “Early Marriage and Childbearing: Risks and Consequences.” In S. Bott, et al., eds. Toward Adulthood: Exploring the Sexual and Reproductive Health of Adolescents in South Asia. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. Bongaarts, J. Population Policy Options in the Developing World. Research Division Working Paper No. 59. New York: The Population Council, 1994. Caldwell, B.K. and J.C. Caldwell. “Below- Replacement fertility: Determinants and Prospects in South Asia.” Journal of Population Research 20, no. 1 (2003), 19–34. CARE. Awash FGC Elimination Project. Final Evaluation Report. Addis Ababa: CARE/ Ethiopia, 2005. Chege, J., I. Askew, S. Igras, and J.K. Muteshi. Testing the Effectiveness of Integrating Community- Based Approaches for Encouraging Abandonment of Female Genital Cutting into CARE’s Reproductive Health Programs in Ethiopia and Kenya. Nairobi: FRONTIERS in Reproductive Health and CARE, 2004.
  • 96. Diop, N.J., M.M. Faye, A. Moreau, J. Cabral, H. Benga, F. Cisse, B. Mane, I. Baumgarten, and M. Melching. The Tostan Program: Evaluation of a Community Based Education Program in Senegal. New York: Population Council, 2004. Erulkar A., T. Mekbib, N. Simie, and T. Gulema. The Experience of Adolescence in Rural Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Accra: Population Council, 2004. Feldman-Jacobs, Charlotte and Sarah Ryniak. Abandoning Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: An In-Depth Look at Promising Practices. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2006. Garcia-Moreno, C., L. Heise, H. Jansen, M. Ellsberg, and C. Watts. “Violence Against Women.” In Science 310, no. 5752 (2005): 1282-1283. Goqwana, A., B. Khumalo, D. Peacock, J. Treat, K. Evans, N. Khanyile, S. Wilson, and T. Oakes. Sonke Gender Justice Network Annual Report: August 1, 2006 - July 31, 2007. Johannesburg, Sonke Gender Justice Network. Heise, Lori and Claudia Garcia-Moreno. “Violence by Intimate Partners.” In E. Krug, L. Dahlberg, J. Mercy, A. Zwi and R. Lozano, eds. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2002. Heise, L., M. Ellsberg, and M. Gottemoeller. “Ending Violence Against Women.” Population Reports, Series L. No. 11. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 1999. Heise, L., M. Ellsberg, and M. Gottemoeller. “A Global Overview of Gender-Based Violence.” International Journal of Gynaecological Obstetrics 78, no. S1 (2002):5-14. Heise L., J. Pitanguy, and A. Germain. Violence Against Women: The Hidden Health Burden. World Bank Discussion Paper 255.Washington, DC: World Bank, 1994. ICRW. (2004). Delaying Age at Marriage in Rural Maharashtra, India. Washington, DC, ICRW: 2 pages. Jones, H., N. Diop, and I. Kabore. “FGC Practices in Burkina Faso and Mali and Their Negative Health Outcomes. Studies in Family Planning 30, no. 3 (1999) 219-230. Kim, J.C., C.H. Watts, J.R. Hargreaves, L.X. Hdhlovu, G. Phetla, L.A. Morison, J. Busza, J.D.H. Proter, and P. Pronyk. “Understanding the Impact of a Microfinance-Based Intervention on Women’s Empowerment and the Reduction of Intimate Partner Violence in South Africa.” American Journal of Public Health 97, no. 10 (2007): 1974- 1802. Kishor, S. and K. Johnson. Profiling Domestic Violence: A Multi-Country Study. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro, 2004. Mathews, S., N. Abrahams, L. Martin, L. Vetten, L. van der Merwe, and R. Jewkes. Every Six Hours a Woman Is Killed by her Intimate Partner: A National Study of Female Homicide in South Africa. Gender and Health Research Group. Pretoria, South Africa: Medical Research Council, 2004. Mathur, S., M. Greene, and A. Malhotra. Too Young to Wed: The Lives, Rights and Health of Young Married Girls. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2003. Morison, L., C. Scherf, G. Ekpo et al. “The Long-term RH Consequences of FGC in Rural Gambia: A Community-Based Survey.” Tropical Med and Intl Health 6:8 (2001): 643-653. Ouoba, D., Z. Congo, N.J. Diop, M. Melching, B. Banza, G. Guiella, I. Baumgarten. Experience from a Community-Based Education Program in Burkina Faso: The Tostan Project. Frontiers Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004. Pande, R., K. Kurz, S. Walia, K. MacQuarrie, and S. Jain. Improving the Reproductive Health of Married and Unmarried Youth in India: Evidence of Effectiveness and Costs from Community-Based Interventions. Washington, DC: ICRW, 2006. Peacock, Dean. Sonke Gender Justice and the One Man Can Campaign. Johannesburg, South Africa: One Man Can Campaign, 2008. Population Reference Bureau. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Data and Trends. Washington, DC: PRB, 2008. Pronyk, P.M., J.C. Kim, J.R. Hargreaves, M.B. Makhubele, L.A. Morison, C. Watts, and J.D.H. Porter. “Microfinance and HIV Prevention: Emerging Lessons from Rural South Afirca.” In Small Enterprise Development 16, no. 3 (2005): 26-38. Rajadurai, H. and S. Igras. CARE’s Experience Working with Communities toward Abandonment of Female Genital Cutting (FGC). Atlanta, Georgia: CARE, 2005. UNICEF. Early Marriage: Child Spouses. Innocenti Digest 7. Florence: UNICEF, Innocenti Research Centre, 2001. UNICEF. Toward a Common Framework for the Abandonment of FGM/C. New York: UNICEF on behalf of the Donors Working Group on FGM/C, 2007. 90 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 97. References 91 Usdin, S., E. Scheepers, S. Goldstein, and G. Japhet. “Achieving Social Change on Gender-Based Violence: A Report on the Impact Evaluation of Soul City’s Fourth Series.” Social Science Medicine 61 (2005): 2434-2445. Wilder, J., R. Masilamani, and E.E. Daniel. Promoting Change in the Reproductive Behavior of Youth: Pathfinder International’s PRACHAR Project. New Delhi: Pathfinder International, 2005. World Health Organization (WHO). Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: An Interagency Statement. Geneva: WHO, 2008. WHO Study Group on Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcome. “Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcome: WHO Collaborative Prospective Study in Six African Countries.” The Lancet 367 (2006):1835. Meeting the Needs of Youth African Youth Alliance (AYA). (2008). Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009 at www.pathfind.org. Blakemore, J.E.O. “Children’s Beliefs about Violating Gender Norms: Boys Shouldn’t Look like Girls, and Girls Shouldn’t Act like Boys.” Sex Role 48 (2003): 411-419. Brady, M., R. Assaad, B. Ibrahim, A. Salem, R. Salem, and N. Zibani. Providing New Opportunities to Adolescent Girls in Socially Conservative Settings: The ISHRAQ Program in Rural Upper Egypt. New York, Population Council, 2007. CARE Georgia. Guria Adolescent Health Project (GAHP). CARE International in Georgia; Baseline Survey. Tbilisi: CARE Georgia, 2005. CARE Georgia. Guria Adolescent Health Project (GAHP). Final Evaluation. Tbilisi: CARE Georgia, 2007. CEDPA. New Visions: Life Skills Education for Boys. Washington, DC: CEDPA, 2005. Eggleston, E., J. Jackson, and K. Hardee. “Sexual Attitudes and Behavior Among Young Adolescents in Jamaica.” International Family Planning Perspectives 25, no.2 (1999):78-84 91. Erulkar, Annabel S. and Erica Chong. Evaluation of a Savings Micro-Credit Program for Vulnerable Young Women in Nairobi. New York: Population Council, 2005. Grant, M.J., B. Mensch, and M.P. Sebastian. Introducing Adolescent Livelihoods Training in the Slums of Allahabad, India. New York: Population Council, 2007. Green, C.P., M. Selim, A. Gamal, and O. Mandil. Promoting Gender Senstivity among Boys in Egypt. Washington, DC: CEDPA, 2006. Grunseit A. Impact of HIV and Sexual Health Education on the Sexual Behaviour of Young People: A Review Update. UNAIDS Best Practice Collection. Geneva: UNAIDS, 1997. Hayden, Rebecca. Young Men Like Us: Experiences and Changes in Sex, Relationships and Reproductive Health among Young, Urban Cambodian Men. Phnom Penh: CARE International/ Cambodia, 2007. Kirby D. Emerging Answers 2007: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007. Kirby, D., B.A. Laris, and L. Rolleri. Sex and HIV Education Programs for Youth: Their Impact and Important Characteristics. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International, 2006. Palenque, E., L. Monano, R.Vernon, F. Gonzales, P. Riveros, and J. Bratt. Effects and Costs of Implementing a Gender-Sensitive Reproductive Health Program. Frontiers Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2004. Pettifor A., A. van der Straten, M. Dunbar, S. Shiboski, and N. Padian. “Early Age of First Sex: A Risk Factor for HIV Infection among Women in Zimbabwe.” In AIDS 18, no.10 (2004):1435-1442. Cited in: J. Gay, K. Hardee, M. Wood, C. Wingfield, E. Kidder, K. Fleming, A. Hairston, and F. Cleghorn. HIV/AIDS Interventions: What is the Evidence? Washington, DC: The POLICY Project, 2005. Population Council. Meeting the Health and Social Needs of Married Girls in India: The First Time Parents Project’s Implementation and Reach. New Delhi: Population Council, 2006. Pulerwitz, J., G. Barker, M. Segundo, and M. Nascimento. Promoting More Gender-equitable Norms and Behaviors among Young Men as an HIV/ AIDS Prevention Strategy. Washington, DC: Horizons Program: 2006. Santhya, K.G. and N. Haberland. Empowering Young Mothers in India: Results of the First-time Parents Project. New York: Population Council, 2007.
  • 98. Santhya, K.G., N. Haberland, A. Das et al. Empowering Married Young Women and Improving their Sexual and Reproductive Health: Effects of the First-time Parents Project. New Delhi: Population Council, 2008 Save the Children. ISHRAQ: Safe Places for Out-of School Adolescent Girls to Learn, Play and Grow. Empowering Rural Girls in Egypt. Westport, CT: Save the Children, 2004. Schuler, Sidney Ruth and Zakir Hossain. “Family Planning Clinics through Women’s Eyes and Voices: A Case Study from Rural Bangladesh.” International Family Planning Perspectives 24, no.4 (1998): 170- 175, 205. Schuler, S.R., M.E. Choque, and S. Rance. “Misinformation, Mistrust and Mistreatment: Family Planning among Bolivian Market Women.” In Studies in Family Planning 25, no.4 (1994): 211-21. Sebastian, M.P., M. Grant, and B. Mensch. Integrating Adolescent Livelihood Activities Within A Reproductive Health Programme For Urban Slum Dwellers In India. Washington DC: Population Council, 2005. Solorzano, I., A. Bank, R. Pena, H. Espinoza, M. Ellsberg, and J. Pulerwitz. Catalyzing Individual and Social Change around Gender, Sexuality and HIV: Impact Evaluation of Puntos de Encuentro’s Communication Strategy in Nicaragua. Horizons Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. Storer, Graeme. Sexual and Reproductive Health Programming for Young Urban Males. Phnom Penh: CARE International/Cambodia, 2007. Stromquist, N.P. “The Gender Socialization Process in Schools: A Cross-National Comparison.” Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008, Education for All by 2015: Will We Make It? Paris: UNESCO, 2007. UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/ AIDS). 2007 AIDS Epidemic Update. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS, 2007. UNICEF. Children and HIV and AIDS. Accessed online July 1, 2009, at www.unicef.org/aids. UN Population Division (2008). Online database. Accessed online Dec. 1, 2009, at http://esa.un.org/unpp. Verma, R., J. Pulerwitz, V.S. Mahendra, S. Khandkar, A.K. Singh, S.S. Das, S. Mehra, A. Nura, and G. Barker. Promoting Gender Equality as a Strategy to Reduce HIV Risk and Gender-bases Violence Among Young Men in India. Horizons Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. WHO. Maternal Mortality Update: Delivering into Good Hands. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. Williams, T., S. Mullen, A. Karim, and J. Posner. Evaluation of the African Youth Alliance Program in Ghana, Tanzania, and Uganda. Arlington, VA: John Snow Inc., 2007. Conclusions Boender, C., D. Santana, D. Santillan, K. Hardee, M.E. Greene, and S. Schuler. The “So What?” Report: A Look at Whether Integrating a Gender Focus into Programs Makes a Difference to Outcomes. Washington, DC: PRB for the IGWG, 2004. Longwe, S.H. “Gender Awareness: The Missing Element in the Third World Development Project.” In T. Wallace and C.March, eds. Changing Perceptions: Writings on Gender and Development. Oxford, England: Oxfam, 1991. Moser, C. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. London: Routledge, 1993. Overholt, C.A., K. Cloud, M.B. Anderson, and J.E. Austin. “Women in Development: A Framework for Project Analysis.” In C.A. Overholt, M.B. Anderson, K. Cloud, and J.E. Austin, eds. Gender Roles in Development Projects. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press, 1985. Pfannenschmidt, S., A. McKay, and E. McNeill. Through a Gender Lens: Resources for Population, Health and Nutrition Projects. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International, 1996. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Department for Democracy and Social Development, Gender Equality Team. Policy Promoting Gender Equality in Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Sida, 2005. United Nations (UN). International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of Action. New York: UN, 1994. UN. Key Actions for the Further Implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development. New York: UN, 1999. UN Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues. Gender Mainstreaming, An Overview. New York: UN, 2002. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). AID Policy Paper: Women in Development. Washington, DC: USAID Bureau for Program and Policy Coordination, 1982. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Gender Policy: Integrating Gender Perspectives in the Work of WHO. Geneva: WHO, 2002. 9922 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 99. Glossary 4-Cell Design. Study designs that involve four treatment arms are called factorial designs, 4-cell designs, or 2x2 designs. These designs aims to test two different interventions (each alone and combined) against a con-trol, which receives no intervention. The following diagram illustrates this study design for two interventions Glossary 93 (A and B): Group 1 A B A only Group 2 Group 3 B only Control (Neither A or B) Group 4 Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). Antiretroviral drugs are medications for the treatment of infection by HIV. Different classes of antiretroviral drugs act at different stages of the HIV life cycle. These drugs are also known as ARVs. In people who have been infected with HIV, ART can lengthen and improve their quality of life. Baseline. Baseline refers to the period prior to (or at the introduction of) an intervention. Data is gathered at this point to compare with performance after the intervention to determine what change has taken place. Chi Square Test. A statistical test that measures whether the distribution of observed data systematically differs from what we would expect if the data were distributed evenly, with no difference between the comparison groups. Cluster Randomized Control Trial. In this type of RCT, clusters, such as communities, hospitals, or other groups of people, are randomized, and all consenting persons in the group are enrolled. Community-Based Survey. A survey where the participants are selected from a pre-defined community. Community-based research often involves more interaction with the community, such as the use of peers or members of the community to recruit or conduct the survey, or community input into the research questions and design of the survey. Contamination. Contamination occurs when there is communication about the intervention between groups of participants (usually treatment and control). This can lead to a diffusion of treatment, because, consciously or subconsciously, the control group receives part or all of the intervention. Contamination can also occur if the intervention is not fully implemented. Control Group. When an intervention is randomly assigned in an experimental study design, the control group does not receive the intervention. The control group is supposed to be comparable to the intervention group, which receives the intervention. If entire groups or communities are randomly assigned, it is referred to as a ‘control area’. Correlated Data. When data are correlated, there is a relationship between two or more sources of data. This means that they tend to vary, be associated, or occur together in a way not expected on the basis of chance alone. For example, if a group of participants in a study respond in a predictable manner, there is a correla-tion among that group. This is often the case among participants who are selected through one health facility. Cost Effectiveness Analysis. This form of analysis seeks to determine the costs and effectiveness of surveillance and response strategies and activities. It can be used to compare similar or alternative strategies and activities to determine the relative degree to which they will obtain the desired objectives or outcomes. The preferred strategy or action is one that has the least cost to produce a given level of effectiveness, or provides the great-est effectiveness for a given level of cost.
  • 100. Cox Proportional Hazard. This is a form of statistical analysis. It is a survival analysis measuring the proportional difference in the length of time to an event between two populations. Endline. Endline refers to the period after an intervention is completed. Data gathered at this point is usually compared with performance before the intervention to determine what change has taken place. Equality. Gender equality is equal treatment of women and men in laws and policies and equal access to resources and services within families, communities, and society at large. Equity. Gender equity connotes fairness and justice in the distribution of opportunities, responsibilities, and benefits available to men and women, and the strategies and processes used to achieve gender equality. Equity is the means, equality is the result. Evaluation. The use of social science research procedures to systematically investigate the effectiveness of social intervention programs that are designed to improve social conditions. Experimental. Experimental studies control the allocation of treatment (intervention) to subjects (participants). The distinguishing feature of experimental studies in evaluation is randomization. In evaluation research, par-ticipants or groups are randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Randomly assigning the groups helps ensure that the intervention and control groups are comparable to each other so that any differences at endline can be attributed to the intervention. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Often referred to as a harmful traditional practice, this involves the cutting or alteration of the female genitalia for social rather than medical reasons. Focus Group Discussion. Focus groups are a form of qualitative data collection. Focus groups usually consist of 8-10 people who are similar in background. They may be randomly or purposively selected to participate. Conversation is guided by a facilitator. Focus groups tend to weed out extreme or false views, and uncover underlying group norms. Follow-up. This is often used interchangeably with the term endline. In some cases, however, follow-up refers to data collection that occurs some period of time after endline. In these cases, endline is the data collection point at the end of the intervention, and follow-up occurs later to see what changes are sustained over time without the intervention. Formative Research. Formative research takes place before or during the design of the intervention itself. The results of formative research guide the design of the program to make it most effective and acceptable to the target population. Formative research is often done as a needs assessment, pretesting to ensure the interven-tion can be implemented, or collection of qualitative data such as focus groups. Gender. This term refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a given soci-ety considers appropriate for men and women. Gender-based Violence. A term used to distinguish violence that targets individuals or groups of indiciduals on the basis of their gender from other forms of violence; may result in physical sexual or psychological harm. Terms such as Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, and Domestic Violence are used to describe gen-der- based violence in its various forms. Gender Norms. Societal messages that dictate what is appropriate or expected behavior for males and females. Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART). A combination of several (usually three or four) antiretroviral drugs is known as Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. HAART is often more effective than using one antiretroviral drug alone. See antiretroviral therapy. Incidence. The rate of new cases of a disease or event in a population. While prevalence is the measure of all cases at one point in time, incidence measures the number of new cases during a time period. Intrapartum. Occurring during or pertaining to labour and/or delivery. Matched Control. When randomization is not possible, individual cases may be matched with individual con-trols that have similar characteristics, such as age. By carefully selecting matches for the intervention cases or groups, the intervention and comparison groups should be similar. 94 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 101. Maternal Morbidity. This refers to a diseased state, illness, or departure from health as a result of pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, labour and delivery, or from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management. Maternal Mortality. A maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggra-vated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental causes. The Maternal Mortality Ratio is Glossary 95 the number of maternal deaths out of 100,000 live births in a given year. Monitoring Data. Data that come from the regular observation, surveillance, or checking of changes in a condi-tion or situation, or changes in activities. Health facilities often use systematic collection of data on specified indicators to provide management with indications of the extent of progress and achievement of objectives. Non-Equivalent Control Group. In quasi-experimental study designs, in which treatment and comparison groups are not randomly assigned, the group that does not receive the intervention is called a non-equivalent control group. The term ‘comparison group’ is also used. Non-Experimental. Non-experimental study designs do not involve randomization or comparison groups. These designs are not able to determine the effect or impact of an intervention, but may be helpful to determine rea-sons why a problem exists or why a program was successful. Non-experimental evaluation designs include post-test only, pretest-posttest without comparison groups, observational studies, or studies using only qualita-tive data. Pilot Project. Pilot projects, similar to formative research, are designed to inform about the success of an inter-vention prior to launching a full-scale intervention. Pilot projects are usually a shorter version of the interven-tion or include a smaller population. Pilots can help to inform whether the population understands, responds, or uses the intervention in the anticipated manner. The results of a pilot study are used to refine the interven-tion before the full-scale program. Postpartum. Of, occurring, or referring to the period after childbirth. Prenatal. Occurring or existing before birth, or preceding birth. It refers to both the care of the woman during pregnancy and the growth and development of the fetus. It is also known as antenatal. Pretest-Posttest. This is a study design in which both the experimental (intervention) and control groups receive an initial measurement observation (known as baseline or pretest). The experimental group then receives the intervention, but the control group does not. After the intervention, a second set of measurement observations is made (known as endline or posttest). Prevalence. The amount of a given disease in a population at a certain time. Prevalence is the measure of all cases at a point in time, while incidence is the measure of new cases during a time period. Process Variable. An indicator or measurement that is used as part of an evaluation to gauge the implementa-tion or monitor the intervention or program. The variable focuses on the process of the intervention, which is the set of activities conducted to achieve the results. Process variables often focus on the quality, access, or reach of a program. Qualitative Data. Qualitative data include virtually any type of information that cannot be captured in a numer-ical format. In social research, it most often refers to open-ended, in-depth interviews with individuals or focus group discussions, but can also include observations or the results of activities such as word associations or free listing. Qualitative data cannot be quantified, but lend insight to processes, feelings, and experiences. Quantitative Data. Data that are collected in a numerical, quantifiable way. Statistical methods of analysis can be applied. Quantitative data can be measurements, counts, ratings, scores, or classifications to which numer-ical values can be applied. Quasi-Experimental. In many field research situations, it is simply not possible or feasible to meet the random assignment criteria of a true experimental study design. Quasi-experimental studies do not meet the random-ization criteria, but are strong study designs that help the researchers to control some of the outside influ-ences that could interfere with the quality or accuracy of the data. Examples of quasi-experimental designs include time series studies, pretest-posttest with non-equivalent control groups, and separate sample pretest-posttest.
  • 102. Randomized Control Trial. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a planned experiment designed to asses the efficacy of an intervention in human beings by comparing the intervention to a control condition. The alloca-tion to intervention or control is determined purely by chance through randomization. An RCT is the gold standard for determining causality in research. Regression Analysis. Regression analysis is a statistical method for describing a “response” or “outcome” vari-able as a simple function of “explanatory” or “predictor” variables. In a simple linear regression, one predic-tor variable is used to predict a response. In multiple linear regression, two or more predictor variables are used to predict the response. This allows for control of additional background characteristics. Logistic regres-sion analysis is used when the outcome is a binary or dichotomous variable. Logistic regression can be simple, using one predictor, or multiple, using two or more predictors. Sample Size. Number of clusters/households/individuals that a survey sets out to include, i.e. interview. The aim of sample size calculation is to have a large enough sample in each group to estimate a population mean or difference in means (or proportions) within a narrow interval. Statistical calculations can determine how large a study sample needs to be in order to have confidence in the results of the statistical analysis. Sex. Refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women. Statistically Significant. A result that tells us only that any observed difference between groups is unlikely to be due to chance. Statistical significance is usually measured at the 0.05 level, which means the observed differ-ence would occur by chance less than five percent of the time. Student’s T Test. This is a statistical hypothesis test that is used when the distribution of values in a population is assumed to be a normal distribution (bell curve) but the standard deviation is unknown. The Student’s T Test is a simple statistical tool that is frequently used to compare a mean (average) measure between two pop-ulations. Syndromic Management. This is one of several biomedical approaches to the treatment of sexually transmitted infections, or STIs. In syndromic management, a clinician (such as a nurse) bases treatment not on clinical tests for disease, but on the symptoms or effects that the individual is experiencing. Treatment is then offered for all diseases that could cause that symptom, or syndrome. In treating STIs, this enables clinicians to offer treatment faster than waiting for test results or in locations where clinical testing is unavailable. Transactional Sex. Sexual behavior that results in women or men receiving money or goods in exchange for sex; usually differentiated from commercial sex or prostitution. Triangulation. Using two or more methods or sources of data to investigate something. It is preferable that the methods and sources have different strengths and weaknesses so that the strengths of one can help counter-balance the weaknesses of the others. Validity. The degree to which a measurement or finding actually measures or detects what it is supposed to measure. Validity refers to the accuracy or truthfulness of a study’s conclusions. 96 Gender Perspectives Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes: New Evidence
  • 103. The Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG), established in 1997, is a network comprising non-governmental ­organizations (NGOs), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), cooperating agencies (CAs), and the USAID Bureau for Global Health (GH). The IGWG promotes gender equity with population, health, and nutrition (PHN) programs with the goal of improving reproductive health/HIV/AIDS outcomes and fostering ­sustainable development. For more information, go to www. igwg.org. For additional copies contact: Population Reference Bureau 1875 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 520 Washington, DC 20009-5728 www.prb.org phone: (202) 483-1100 email: [email protected]