1
Report 015
Retention
Life Working Series 2015
2
1. Introduction
Understanding the length of time employees remain
with a company and the drivers of retention.
The latest report in our Life Working
series looks at retention in the City
focussing on the average length of service,
why people stay with an employer and
their reasons for leaving.
The research for this report was
undertaken by online survey between
15th August and 23rd September 2014.
Requests to participate in the survey were
sent to more than 27,238 current and
former candidates and clients of Astbury
Marsden. A total of 1,046 responses were
received and analysed.
The information and data contained in
this report are for information purposes
only and are not intended, nor implied to
be a substitute for professional advice. In
no event will Astbury Marsden be liable
to you or any third party for any decision
made or action taken in reliance of the
results obtained through the use of the
information and/or data contained or
provided herein.
Please consider that the answers given are
based on the respondents interpretation of
the question and the response options.
If you have questions regarding the
survey, or the report please contact:
Adam Jackson
+44 (0)20 7065 1185
adam.jackson@astburymarsden.com
3
2. Executive
Summary
Time to say goodbye? The key to keeping good
staff.
Often, you hear the phrase “people don’t
leave companies they leave managers.”
Although there is some truth in this - our
survey shows that retention is a far more
complex issue.
Compensation of course plays a role,
but not as much as some may think. In
fact, some think of compensation as a
“hygiene” factor - over compensating
your employees won’t remedy a bad work
environment.
So, what did our research uncover? Key
findings on employee’s tenure, include:
•	 Over two thirds of respondents have
been with their employer for 1 to 3
years.
•	 The highest proportion of employees
with more than ten years service
can be found in exchanges & trading
platforms. However, 39% have less
than 1 year’s tenure. This could
suggest growth within the sector as
they seek to add resource to growing
demands.
•	 On a functional basis, over half of
revenue generating staff have over
5 years tenure with their employer
compared to just 5% of HR staff. This
is a stark contrast to last year’s results
where we saw the highest proportion
of staff with tenure over 5 years
within HR.
•	 On average, men have longer tenures
than women with 22% having over 5
years with their employer, compared
to 19% of women.
With regards to retention, we found that:
•	 Interesting work (25%) is still the
key factor which retains City staff. A
feeling of security (2%) has the least
effect on whether employees stay.
•	 Employees stay with their employer
as long as they feel challenged and
mentally stretched. Last year, 21%
felt the lack of roles elsewhere was
a reason to stay, however, this year,
just 13% feel the same way. This could
indicate an increase in confidence in
the jobs market.
•	 A lack of opportunities for
development remains the primary
reason people leave their employer.
However, last year we saw unfair pay
levels as the second biggest reason for
leaving (37%). This year this reason
has dropped to third place behind a
lack of recognition (33%).
In summary, in order to retain staff,
companies need to ensure that they
provide challenging work and make clear
there are opportunities for progression
within the business.
For further insights, please do read the
report. I hope you find it to be of interest.
4
3. Employee
Tenure
Looking at the length of service of employees in the City.
Overview
Fig 3.1 There has been little change in the tenure of employees this year. The
majority (35%) of employees have been with their employer for 1 - 3 years
and a further one quarter have a tenure of less than a year.
The greatest proportion of long serving employees are found within
Exchanges & Trading Platforms, Corporate Broking & Stockbroking and
Investment Management. The shortest service is within The Regulators,
Commodity Trading and Fund Services.
Nearly one quarter of Exchanges & Trading Platform staff have been with their employer for 10 years or
more, suggesting that they are being continually challenged in their role. However, a further 39% have
less than one year’s tenure. This could be due to a flurry of hiring within the area last year.
In line with last year, no Compliance staff have been with their current employer for more than 10
years whilst 38% have been in their role for less than a year. This could be as a result of the continued
increase in opportunities within risk and compliance within the City.
Last year’s results showed over a quarter of HR employees with more than five years tenure. In
contrast, this year, less than 5% have the same tenure and over half have been in their role for less
than one year. The last 12 months has seen a flurry of HR talent making the most of the increased job
opportunities in the market.
5
Gender
Fig 3.2
This year, on average, men have a slightly longer length of service than women. 22% of male employees
remain with their employer for more than five years compared to 19% of women. Last year, the opposite
was true.
We still see a large proportion of women postponing their careers due to family commitments; this
could be one reason for their shorter tenure.
Tenure Female Male
<1 year 26.0% 24.3%
1 - 3 years 36.6% 34.9%
3 - 5 years 18.7% 18.7%
5 - 8 years 12.2% 11.5%
8 - 10 years 2.4% 2.8%
10+ years 4.1% 7.8%
6
4. Staff
Retention
We look at what factors make people decide to stay
with their employer.
Mostimportantfactors
Fig 4.1
When looking at what employees want from their employer, we can see that pay alone is not enough.
One quarter think interesting work is the most important factor whilst just over one fifth, believe that
fair pay is the crucial element.
At the other end of the scale, just 2% want security and 9% look for good working conditions. This
suggests that City workers have confidence in the job market to find a new position and are less
concerned by maintaining a secure role with their employer.
This year we saw the biggest increase in the importance to employees of their employer recognising
their success. Staff want to feel appreciated and recognised for doing a good job, this not only builds
trust, but it can strengthen loyalty and retention and improve performance.
7
Reasonsforstayingwithcurrentemployer
Fig 4.2
When asked why they stay with their current employer, 28% stated the challenging work, however, one fifth stated that opportunities
for career advancement was what retained them. Employees want to feel like they have the opportunity to fulfil their potential in their
role whilst being stretched to achieve more. They want to see that their hard work can be rewarded with further career moves and
advancements within their business.
Last year, we saw the lack of opportunities elsewhere as the second most popular reason why people stayed. This year, this has
dropped to fourth place, with just 13% who believe there are fewer opportunities. This shows an increased confidence in the job
market and the move towards a candidate led market.
Reasons 2015 2014 Difference
Challenged by the work 27.5% 28.7% -1.3%
Opportunities for career advancement 21.9% 19.8% 2.0%
Competitive salary 13.2% 12.2% 1.0%
Lack of opportunities elsewhere 12.9% 21.2% -8.2%
Other 10.3% 8.0% 2.2%
Good management style 8.7% 5.6% 3.1%
Attractive employee benefits 2.9% 3.2% -0.3%
Little travel 2.7% 1.3% 1.4%
Whypeoplestayaslongastheydo
Fig 4.3
Opportunities for career advancement are the most important for those with the lowest tenure, but this decreases over time. Those
with a tenure over 10 years, see it as one of the least important factors. This suggests that many join a business with future career
progression in mind, but other factors make them stay.
A desire to be challenged at work is important at all levels of tenure, but is the most important for those who have remained with their
employer for 8 - 10 years.
Last year, the results showed that benefits are more important to longer serving employees. This year, it appears to be more important
to those who have remained with their employer for 5 - 8 years and 3 - 5 years. This may be due to benefits which have accrued over
time which employees do not want to forfeit as part of a career move.
Tenure
Attractive
employee
benefits
Challenged by
the work
Competitive
salary
Good
management
style
Lack of
opportunities
elsewhere
Little travel
Opportunities for
career
advancement
Other
<1 Year 1.8% 24.8% 16.5% 8.3% 6.4% 1.8% 25.7% 14.7%
1 - 3 Years 0.6% 28.0% 14.0% 8.9% 14.6% 2.5% 24.2% 7.0%
3 - 5 Years 6.0% 27.7% 7.2% 7.2% 16.9% 3.6% 21.7% 9.6%
5 - 8 Years 7.5% 22.6% 11.3% 9.4% 15.1% 5.7% 18.9% 9.4%
8 - 10 Years 0.0% 58.3% 16.7% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0%
10 + Years 3.2% 32.3% 12.9% 9.7% 19.4% 0.0% 3.2% 19.4%
TOTAL 2.9% 27.6% 13.0% 8.5% 13.0% 2.7% 21.8% 10.3%
8
Effectivenessofretentiontools
Fig 4.4
According to respondents, the most effective tool for retaining staff is to provide future opportunities
within the organisation (54%). This is in line with section 4.3 where ‘opportunities for career
advancement’ is seen as a key reason to stay with an employer.
When it comes to financial benefits, ‘paying above the labour market’, ‘providing incentives and
bonuses’ and ‘providing cash bonuses’ are all seen to be effective.
With an increasingly mobile, flexible workforce, employees are citing ‘allowing flexible working’ as
an attractive aid for retention. As companies take their own individual stance on flexible working,
competition for talent increases for those who are looking for a bit more flexibility from their employer.
We will investigate this further in our next report in the Life Working Series; ‘Mobility & Flexible
Working’.
Providing total compensation statements and mentors has the least effect on retention.
Retention tools
1 2 3 4
AVERAGE
Ineffective
Slightly
effective
Effective
Very
effective
Providing future opportunities within
the organisation
1.6% 7.6% 37.0% 53.8% 3.4
Paying above the labour market 2.2% 13.7% 40.2% 43.8% 3.3
Providing incentives and bonus
opportunities
2.7% 13.5% 47.9% 35.9% 3.2
Providing cash bonuses 3.2% 14.9% 39.6% 42.3% 3.2
Allowing flexible working 2.7% 13.7% 40.8% 42.8% 3.2
Providing an extensive benefits
package
3.2% 17.2% 49.7% 30.0% 3.1
Training and development 3.1% 23.6% 47.2% 26.1% 3.0
Providing stock option and/or equity
awards
7.9% 35.7% 39.6% 16.9% 2.7
Providing total compensation
statements
14.9% 34.6% 38.0% 12.4% 2.5
Providing mentors 11.7% 41.1% 36.6% 10.6% 2.5
9
Reasonsforleaving
Fig 4.5
In line with last year, over half of respondents (56%) believe that a lack of career development is the
main reason people quit. A further 33% believe that a lack of recognition is to blame and 31% see unfair
pay levels as the cause. Not only do employees want to see that there is somewhere for their career to
go, but they want to feel valued and recognised for their achievements, this includes praise from their
manager, and also a fair level of pay.
Too much travel and a difficult or long commute were not seen as likely to affect an employee’s decision
to leave, this could be because these are important considerations when joining a firm, generally
employees know what they are getting into when it comes to commuting and travel requirements.
The biggest change when looking at last year, was a 6% decrease in the proportion of people who believe
unfair pay levels is the main reason people leave. This year, 6% more respondents believe work-life
balance issues are the key reason for moving jobs compared to last year. As businesses either embrace
or reject the notion of flexible working, we will see an increase in the competition for candidates who
are looking for a better work-life balance.
10
AboutAstbury
Marsden
Astbury Marsden is an international recruitment firm
focussed on financial services, energy and professional
services.
We specialise in recruiting uniquely talented people in business technology, business
transformation, governance and specialist skills. We intimately understand the
dynamics of the financial services, energy and professional services markets; making
sure we know the people our clients need to occupy critical roles throughout their
business. We help clients determine the people they need and then we find the best
of them.
We have a global perspective and we are territory-neutral. We look for market
identifiers that we recognise, and apply our experience and intelligence to solve the
challenges they face. Our regional hubs established in London and Singapore allow
us to serve our clients across EMEA and throughout Asia.
You can find more out at www.astburymarsden.com
Singapore
Mark O’Reilly
65 Chulia Street,
OCBC Centre, #43-01,
Singapore 049513
+65 6709 5151
London
Adam Jackson
33 Cannon Street,
London
EC4M 5SB
+44 (0)20 7065 1222
Report 15_Retention ONLINE

More Related Content

PDF
Report 02_The FCF 2015 Online
PDF
Interim Partners - Research White Paper 2014
PDF
Report 01_Profile of Singapore 2015_Email
PDF
Salary survey c level-2018
PDF
What Talent Wants - Finance
PPTX
Channel Industry Experts Survey Results
PDF
North East Salary Survey 2016
PDF
2016-17 IT Workforce Insights Report
Report 02_The FCF 2015 Online
Interim Partners - Research White Paper 2014
Report 01_Profile of Singapore 2015_Email
Salary survey c level-2018
What Talent Wants - Finance
Channel Industry Experts Survey Results
North East Salary Survey 2016
2016-17 IT Workforce Insights Report

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
PPTX
CFA Institute & Edelman Investor Trust Study
PDF
2014 Compensation and Benefits Trends in the GCC Report
PDF
Pulse retention and turnover 2015
PDF
Michael Page - Global Employment Trends - Financial Sector 2013
PDF
adp-whitepaper-ph
PDF
Hv3313561361
PDF
Annual GCC Compensation and Benefits Trends Report 2015
PPT
Employee Engagement Insights from the 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer
PPTX
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
PPT
Recruiting Trends
PDF
SammonsPMI_News_April_mk6-8
PDF
The State of Small Business Cash Flow
PDF
2011 2012 Logistics Executive EMS Report
PPTX
Internships
PDF
PBI Contractor Failure Rates, Whys and How to Eliminate
PDF
CIPR State of the Profession 2019
PDF
2014 north americantrendsreport
PPTX
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
PPTX
Shrm mhfcu-financial-wellness-2014 - final
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
CFA Institute & Edelman Investor Trust Study
2014 Compensation and Benefits Trends in the GCC Report
Pulse retention and turnover 2015
Michael Page - Global Employment Trends - Financial Sector 2013
adp-whitepaper-ph
Hv3313561361
Annual GCC Compensation and Benefits Trends Report 2015
Employee Engagement Insights from the 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
Recruiting Trends
SammonsPMI_News_April_mk6-8
The State of Small Business Cash Flow
2011 2012 Logistics Executive EMS Report
Internships
PBI Contractor Failure Rates, Whys and How to Eliminate
CIPR State of the Profession 2019
2014 north americantrendsreport
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
Shrm mhfcu-financial-wellness-2014 - final
Ad

Similar to Report 15_Retention ONLINE (20)

PDF
The Loyalty Premium Report
DOCX
What Do Employees Seek… Job Hopping!!
PDF
GCS Tech Salary Guide 2016
PDF
white paper retention surveys final
PPTX
Retention September 2010
PPTX
2. Assessing Yourself And Your Situation
PDF
Retaining Technology Talent [WHITE PAPER]
PPT
Love’em Or Lose’em
DOC
DOCX
104768846 employees-retention
PDF
Catalyst Study: Turnover and Retention
ODP
Employee retention.
PDF
Reed_HR_2015_Salary_Guide
PDF
Reed_HR_2015_Salary_Guide
PPTX
HR Trends Manufacturing 2019
PPT
Workforce Crisis (Revised) 2008
PDF
Old Older Oldest
PDF
Carerr change
PPTX
Maximizing retention and minimizing attrition April 2012
PPT
Careers and Career Management
The Loyalty Premium Report
What Do Employees Seek… Job Hopping!!
GCS Tech Salary Guide 2016
white paper retention surveys final
Retention September 2010
2. Assessing Yourself And Your Situation
Retaining Technology Talent [WHITE PAPER]
Love’em Or Lose’em
104768846 employees-retention
Catalyst Study: Turnover and Retention
Employee retention.
Reed_HR_2015_Salary_Guide
Reed_HR_2015_Salary_Guide
HR Trends Manufacturing 2019
Workforce Crisis (Revised) 2008
Old Older Oldest
Carerr change
Maximizing retention and minimizing attrition April 2012
Careers and Career Management
Ad

Report 15_Retention ONLINE

  • 2. 2 1. Introduction Understanding the length of time employees remain with a company and the drivers of retention. The latest report in our Life Working series looks at retention in the City focussing on the average length of service, why people stay with an employer and their reasons for leaving. The research for this report was undertaken by online survey between 15th August and 23rd September 2014. Requests to participate in the survey were sent to more than 27,238 current and former candidates and clients of Astbury Marsden. A total of 1,046 responses were received and analysed. The information and data contained in this report are for information purposes only and are not intended, nor implied to be a substitute for professional advice. In no event will Astbury Marsden be liable to you or any third party for any decision made or action taken in reliance of the results obtained through the use of the information and/or data contained or provided herein. Please consider that the answers given are based on the respondents interpretation of the question and the response options. If you have questions regarding the survey, or the report please contact: Adam Jackson +44 (0)20 7065 1185 [email protected]
  • 3. 3 2. Executive Summary Time to say goodbye? The key to keeping good staff. Often, you hear the phrase “people don’t leave companies they leave managers.” Although there is some truth in this - our survey shows that retention is a far more complex issue. Compensation of course plays a role, but not as much as some may think. In fact, some think of compensation as a “hygiene” factor - over compensating your employees won’t remedy a bad work environment. So, what did our research uncover? Key findings on employee’s tenure, include: • Over two thirds of respondents have been with their employer for 1 to 3 years. • The highest proportion of employees with more than ten years service can be found in exchanges & trading platforms. However, 39% have less than 1 year’s tenure. This could suggest growth within the sector as they seek to add resource to growing demands. • On a functional basis, over half of revenue generating staff have over 5 years tenure with their employer compared to just 5% of HR staff. This is a stark contrast to last year’s results where we saw the highest proportion of staff with tenure over 5 years within HR. • On average, men have longer tenures than women with 22% having over 5 years with their employer, compared to 19% of women. With regards to retention, we found that: • Interesting work (25%) is still the key factor which retains City staff. A feeling of security (2%) has the least effect on whether employees stay. • Employees stay with their employer as long as they feel challenged and mentally stretched. Last year, 21% felt the lack of roles elsewhere was a reason to stay, however, this year, just 13% feel the same way. This could indicate an increase in confidence in the jobs market. • A lack of opportunities for development remains the primary reason people leave their employer. However, last year we saw unfair pay levels as the second biggest reason for leaving (37%). This year this reason has dropped to third place behind a lack of recognition (33%). In summary, in order to retain staff, companies need to ensure that they provide challenging work and make clear there are opportunities for progression within the business. For further insights, please do read the report. I hope you find it to be of interest.
  • 4. 4 3. Employee Tenure Looking at the length of service of employees in the City. Overview Fig 3.1 There has been little change in the tenure of employees this year. The majority (35%) of employees have been with their employer for 1 - 3 years and a further one quarter have a tenure of less than a year. The greatest proportion of long serving employees are found within Exchanges & Trading Platforms, Corporate Broking & Stockbroking and Investment Management. The shortest service is within The Regulators, Commodity Trading and Fund Services. Nearly one quarter of Exchanges & Trading Platform staff have been with their employer for 10 years or more, suggesting that they are being continually challenged in their role. However, a further 39% have less than one year’s tenure. This could be due to a flurry of hiring within the area last year. In line with last year, no Compliance staff have been with their current employer for more than 10 years whilst 38% have been in their role for less than a year. This could be as a result of the continued increase in opportunities within risk and compliance within the City. Last year’s results showed over a quarter of HR employees with more than five years tenure. In contrast, this year, less than 5% have the same tenure and over half have been in their role for less than one year. The last 12 months has seen a flurry of HR talent making the most of the increased job opportunities in the market.
  • 5. 5 Gender Fig 3.2 This year, on average, men have a slightly longer length of service than women. 22% of male employees remain with their employer for more than five years compared to 19% of women. Last year, the opposite was true. We still see a large proportion of women postponing their careers due to family commitments; this could be one reason for their shorter tenure. Tenure Female Male <1 year 26.0% 24.3% 1 - 3 years 36.6% 34.9% 3 - 5 years 18.7% 18.7% 5 - 8 years 12.2% 11.5% 8 - 10 years 2.4% 2.8% 10+ years 4.1% 7.8%
  • 6. 6 4. Staff Retention We look at what factors make people decide to stay with their employer. Mostimportantfactors Fig 4.1 When looking at what employees want from their employer, we can see that pay alone is not enough. One quarter think interesting work is the most important factor whilst just over one fifth, believe that fair pay is the crucial element. At the other end of the scale, just 2% want security and 9% look for good working conditions. This suggests that City workers have confidence in the job market to find a new position and are less concerned by maintaining a secure role with their employer. This year we saw the biggest increase in the importance to employees of their employer recognising their success. Staff want to feel appreciated and recognised for doing a good job, this not only builds trust, but it can strengthen loyalty and retention and improve performance.
  • 7. 7 Reasonsforstayingwithcurrentemployer Fig 4.2 When asked why they stay with their current employer, 28% stated the challenging work, however, one fifth stated that opportunities for career advancement was what retained them. Employees want to feel like they have the opportunity to fulfil their potential in their role whilst being stretched to achieve more. They want to see that their hard work can be rewarded with further career moves and advancements within their business. Last year, we saw the lack of opportunities elsewhere as the second most popular reason why people stayed. This year, this has dropped to fourth place, with just 13% who believe there are fewer opportunities. This shows an increased confidence in the job market and the move towards a candidate led market. Reasons 2015 2014 Difference Challenged by the work 27.5% 28.7% -1.3% Opportunities for career advancement 21.9% 19.8% 2.0% Competitive salary 13.2% 12.2% 1.0% Lack of opportunities elsewhere 12.9% 21.2% -8.2% Other 10.3% 8.0% 2.2% Good management style 8.7% 5.6% 3.1% Attractive employee benefits 2.9% 3.2% -0.3% Little travel 2.7% 1.3% 1.4% Whypeoplestayaslongastheydo Fig 4.3 Opportunities for career advancement are the most important for those with the lowest tenure, but this decreases over time. Those with a tenure over 10 years, see it as one of the least important factors. This suggests that many join a business with future career progression in mind, but other factors make them stay. A desire to be challenged at work is important at all levels of tenure, but is the most important for those who have remained with their employer for 8 - 10 years. Last year, the results showed that benefits are more important to longer serving employees. This year, it appears to be more important to those who have remained with their employer for 5 - 8 years and 3 - 5 years. This may be due to benefits which have accrued over time which employees do not want to forfeit as part of a career move. Tenure Attractive employee benefits Challenged by the work Competitive salary Good management style Lack of opportunities elsewhere Little travel Opportunities for career advancement Other <1 Year 1.8% 24.8% 16.5% 8.3% 6.4% 1.8% 25.7% 14.7% 1 - 3 Years 0.6% 28.0% 14.0% 8.9% 14.6% 2.5% 24.2% 7.0% 3 - 5 Years 6.0% 27.7% 7.2% 7.2% 16.9% 3.6% 21.7% 9.6% 5 - 8 Years 7.5% 22.6% 11.3% 9.4% 15.1% 5.7% 18.9% 9.4% 8 - 10 Years 0.0% 58.3% 16.7% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 10 + Years 3.2% 32.3% 12.9% 9.7% 19.4% 0.0% 3.2% 19.4% TOTAL 2.9% 27.6% 13.0% 8.5% 13.0% 2.7% 21.8% 10.3%
  • 8. 8 Effectivenessofretentiontools Fig 4.4 According to respondents, the most effective tool for retaining staff is to provide future opportunities within the organisation (54%). This is in line with section 4.3 where ‘opportunities for career advancement’ is seen as a key reason to stay with an employer. When it comes to financial benefits, ‘paying above the labour market’, ‘providing incentives and bonuses’ and ‘providing cash bonuses’ are all seen to be effective. With an increasingly mobile, flexible workforce, employees are citing ‘allowing flexible working’ as an attractive aid for retention. As companies take their own individual stance on flexible working, competition for talent increases for those who are looking for a bit more flexibility from their employer. We will investigate this further in our next report in the Life Working Series; ‘Mobility & Flexible Working’. Providing total compensation statements and mentors has the least effect on retention. Retention tools 1 2 3 4 AVERAGE Ineffective Slightly effective Effective Very effective Providing future opportunities within the organisation 1.6% 7.6% 37.0% 53.8% 3.4 Paying above the labour market 2.2% 13.7% 40.2% 43.8% 3.3 Providing incentives and bonus opportunities 2.7% 13.5% 47.9% 35.9% 3.2 Providing cash bonuses 3.2% 14.9% 39.6% 42.3% 3.2 Allowing flexible working 2.7% 13.7% 40.8% 42.8% 3.2 Providing an extensive benefits package 3.2% 17.2% 49.7% 30.0% 3.1 Training and development 3.1% 23.6% 47.2% 26.1% 3.0 Providing stock option and/or equity awards 7.9% 35.7% 39.6% 16.9% 2.7 Providing total compensation statements 14.9% 34.6% 38.0% 12.4% 2.5 Providing mentors 11.7% 41.1% 36.6% 10.6% 2.5
  • 9. 9 Reasonsforleaving Fig 4.5 In line with last year, over half of respondents (56%) believe that a lack of career development is the main reason people quit. A further 33% believe that a lack of recognition is to blame and 31% see unfair pay levels as the cause. Not only do employees want to see that there is somewhere for their career to go, but they want to feel valued and recognised for their achievements, this includes praise from their manager, and also a fair level of pay. Too much travel and a difficult or long commute were not seen as likely to affect an employee’s decision to leave, this could be because these are important considerations when joining a firm, generally employees know what they are getting into when it comes to commuting and travel requirements. The biggest change when looking at last year, was a 6% decrease in the proportion of people who believe unfair pay levels is the main reason people leave. This year, 6% more respondents believe work-life balance issues are the key reason for moving jobs compared to last year. As businesses either embrace or reject the notion of flexible working, we will see an increase in the competition for candidates who are looking for a better work-life balance.
  • 10. 10 AboutAstbury Marsden Astbury Marsden is an international recruitment firm focussed on financial services, energy and professional services. We specialise in recruiting uniquely talented people in business technology, business transformation, governance and specialist skills. We intimately understand the dynamics of the financial services, energy and professional services markets; making sure we know the people our clients need to occupy critical roles throughout their business. We help clients determine the people they need and then we find the best of them. We have a global perspective and we are territory-neutral. We look for market identifiers that we recognise, and apply our experience and intelligence to solve the challenges they face. Our regional hubs established in London and Singapore allow us to serve our clients across EMEA and throughout Asia. You can find more out at www.astburymarsden.com Singapore Mark O’Reilly 65 Chulia Street, OCBC Centre, #43-01, Singapore 049513 +65 6709 5151 London Adam Jackson 33 Cannon Street, London EC4M 5SB +44 (0)20 7065 1222