7. Evaluation (FMP).pptx
- 3. Research • Existing products: From researching existing products, I was influenced to create a very memorable, clear and distinctive style of poster using contrasting colours and clear language. One weakness was that it is difficult to be inspired by posters because they are simple in design and difficult to take information without plagiarism. • Survey's: I saw different perspectives on what to create. It allowed me to make a more popular product. I was able to find what demographic I could aim towards. One weakness was that I was affected by not knowing what questions I really wanted to ask and needed to know the answers to. • Interviews: I got more in-depth answers but felt I received more biased answers due to the interviewee not wanting to offend. I didn't rely on the information received as much as the surveys or the existing product research.
- 4. Planning • I relied more on visual planning than written planning. I went back to visual planning when I was struggling to create the final product. I've gained a good memory of the written parts of the work more than the visual. Any problems I had I resolved without having to use the pre-production writing. • Contingency and health and safety planning were useful to consider but I mainly relied on common sense to create my product safely. • I did not use props or locations and I knew what software and hardware I was going to use. I never had to look at the pre- production to know what software I needed to use.
- 5. Time Management • Removing the background of the Dandy Lion took a lot longer than I thought it would. I didn't know how to use the more advanced tools to remove the smaller parts around the edges of the image. I became quicker as I figured out how to use the more advanced tools. • The fastest bit of work I did was the colouring of the background. The paint bucket tool meant it was only a click of a button. • Another unexpected thing that caused me trouble was using the transform tool to scale things properly. Things looked out of place and uneven. This set me back time wise.
- 6. Technical Qualities • Listerine has a more 3D perspective. My poster is mostly flat. • Listerine poster and my post both include animals and plants • Listerine poster has a larger variety of colours
- 7. Aesthetic Qualities My work is good. It has humour there is a dandy lion, a bird and octopus which is a comedic version of dandelion and burdock. It is eye-catching, distinctive and memorable. I believe some people may be alienated by the design.
- 9. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – I like the way it was edited, and how you managed to make it look like an actual can you can buy, • What improvements could have been made to the product? I guess you could change the font size and colours a bit to stand out, and could try use less images or spread them out more. Aside from that, its pretty good
- 10. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? – i like the usage of colour with the background and how it matches with the dandelion and also like the mascot which is a lion. • What improvements could have been made to the product? Only improvement's I would say is maybe improving on using different colours for the background.
- 11. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? – only improvement's I would say is maybe improving on using different colours for the background • What improvements could have been made to the product?What could be improved is by adding more images/designs/colours in the background of your product.
- 12. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? There could've been a better font be used. The colour could've be better. The layout could've been improved. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – There should have been more images
- 13. Peer Feedback Summary They liked the lion mascot and the editing. They didn’t like the font size, there was either too many or too little images. The changes I would be to make the font on the tagline larger and clearer and ask about how many earlier on in my research.
Editor's Notes
- #4: What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
- #5: What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
- #6: Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
- #7: Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
- #8: Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
- #14: What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?